Added: 1 month ago
From: TheAmazingTerroja
Views: 8,907
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (173)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The constitution is not perfect and should not be treated as the ultimate blueprint for government. It needs to be modernized.

  • all i gotta say is amazing athiest helps me think about my own shit. plus the constitution is a LIVING document not something rigid as my boner for santorums death

  • Notice all the hateful comments are from the "Ron Paul Haters" playlists.

  • amazing atheist = Amazing Ape,

    I hit pause and did not watch this video, I lost IQ the last time I heard this guy babble.

  • this guy has absolutely no good points. the representative count speech was mediocre, only cuz the ratio of reps vs ppl. but we have internet/high speed communications/text some number to vote for americas idol. so who fucking cares about reps, when we can represent ourselves these days via high speed communications. but to so arrogantly let an opportunity arrive from time to time,so it can be completely changed to suit whomever that work to be in the positions to rewrite it? you're f'n dumb.

  • "Strict Constitutionalists" isn't relegated to the loopholes in a document somewhere...It's a way of seeing the world in general..A Philosophy (to which the Essence of the Constitution adheres too)....It's like saying..I'm a Libertarian or an Anarcho Capitalist...It's summoning an image to help "those who don't know.." understand it..This is my life, It's a trip but it's mine. and I am a "Strict Constitutionalist"

  • yes we need to get rid of the consitution, or change it. you know cuz 'freedom of speech' is no longer needed just as, the right to bear arms, the right to trial, privacy, use of witnesses, etc... so we need to abolish the constitution and/or rewrite it so as to get rid of what was on the constitution just as previous ppl tried to do, which ppl where not happy with the first time they tried to get rid of them. the new additions don't really suggest any extra freedoms, just how to narrow the def

  • Burp !  Burrrrrp. ..... fart, Fart ! Swwweeeeee frap ! That's my response to this.

  • fucker's got a point

  • why did he deleted it?

  • ron paul is still a hell of a much better choice than all others combined.

  • So is this TJ's other account or what!

  • Fucking tool talk about other stupid candidates like you you fag ass .

  • TJ deleted this because he's a fucking pussy and I'll shove a motherfucking french fry up his ass.

  • @redcomic619 I think TJ deleted it because of his Youtube sponsorship

  • We can't play sports without a rule book do we..... because it is chaos. And people are no longer following the rules in the government

  • You should point out the constitution limits the government and what they can do..... they have no right yo spend the tax payers cash like that ....... your just an idiot when you say your a strict constitutionilast you are saying you follow the rule book that this country was based on

  • Except that the whisky rebellion was actually a rebellion, not just a protest.

    The senate and house set up was done to make the small states agree to the constitution. It's a compromise that was necessary at the time.

  • ron paul 2012

  • We don't need to be living by his rules anymore, so we'll follow his advice.

    I agree with you, but the irony was funny.

  • Good video except TJ forgot to mention that accordng to the constitution blacks are 3/5ths of a person

  • also, classy stash :)

  • So you don't like Ron Paul because he supports the founding document of the united states? First off if politicians followed the constitution in the first place we wouldn't have many of the problems we face currently in America (many of the problems Ron Paul addresses). Secondly why so you not support the ONLY presidential candidate that can back up their WHOLE platform with the constitution? Probably because you're in the illuminati. haha

    Ron Paul 2012!!!!

  • @rockhardpope1 The founding document of the United States actually tells us not to treat it as sacrosanct. It even tells future generations to destroy it altogether if it is deemed appropriate. The founders, who were some seriously flawed individuals rarely deserving of the complete adulation they receive at least had the wherewithal to understand that times would change. TJ's point is that simply because something is, or isn't constitutional should not decide the issue.

  • @rockhardpope1 Ron Paul actually supports many unconstitutional things.

  • "for some reason in my stupid mind"

    well, you were right about one thing at least.

    go read the constitution and if you still don't see the logical connection paul makes, you sir, are fucked!

  • So in the video when you talk about the time when people got kicked out of Time Square for littering you said they disobeyed the constitution and that the law against littering should be ignored over the constitution but in this video you say that the constitution is an old document and it should be changed to fit the modern times?sorry for my shit english btw

  • californa's fault for over breeding :P

  • are you missing your right arm? or are you a premature-ejaculator? either way you look and sound like shit.

  • Shut your fat mouth and go eat some big macs...

  • I love the end. It shows his ignorance.

  • What a hypocrite. He's such a douchebag. He ties nothing together efficiently and rambles angrily with almost nothing really to say. What empty entertainment is this? He's right because if you look at the constitution it does say nothing about "social safety nets" or "business". The constitution isn't perfect its a system. It has flaws like any other. The supreme court is there to interpret the constitution purely and for no other reason.

  • @Pyrus335 He probably deleted the video because it wasn't coherent, so give the man credit. He recognized his mistake.

  • @ChakraKnot Does that mean I should pat him on the back? Recognizing your mistake is one thing but failing to see the worth of so many is another.

  • @Pyrus335 That makes no sense. Give him shit for the mistakes he hasn't corrected. Never letting something go just makes you a jerk.

  • @ChakraKnot Just because someone makes a mistake does not mean that there is no mandate for improvement as a direct result of that mistake. That is what I meant.

  • @Pyrus335 His other videos usually contain better arguments, so your point falls a little flat.

  • @ChakraKnot That strictly is a matter of opinion. A lot of his videos are matters of opinion. You can't base anything solid off of opinion.

  • @Pyrus335 My point is, there were few fact based opinions in this video and he tends to use at least one or two. His logic also tends to have less holes. I assume you agree if you stick around and watch the man.

  • @ChakraKnot Yeah he's entertaining and what not.

  • You're a disgusting person. You were shit back in 07 when I used to watch your videos for entertainment. You're still shit 5 years later. What have you done with your life?

  • The writers of the Constitution wrote in later letters and such that the Constitution was an evolving set of fundamental principles that were not entrenched so that it could be mdoified.. What gets me is that now some in the Republican party now believe that it should not be altered unless they want to alter it according to their personal beliefs (search amendments they have recently introduced).. Republicans only want what they want and fuck anyone else is their beliefts (sore loosers *IMHO*)

  • Did you get the marker off your lip?? *LMAO*

  • In other words, we should just throw out the laws of the land and have an anarchist state? I'm sorry, but none of this makes any sense.

  • @theolivetree95 I don't think he is saying that. He is saying that the constitution shouldn't be followed religiously.

    I myself think the constitution moderates American politics, but it shouldn't be viewed as perfect.

  • You completely forget, the constitution is a 'guideline' and Paul knows it. It doesn't apply to 'advances in science and the future' because it specifically stays away from meddling with that aspect of life. It just tries to state a guideline for 'rights'(slavery really started 'rolling back' around that time, it was evaporating from the North before the Civil War came to a head). Freedom and Rights don't become 'ancient' or 'non-applicable' with time. They don't just 'not matter' tomorrow.

  • This is 9 minutes and 33 seconds of bullshit.

  • Actually this is a very good video, making good points. Too bad he deleted it.

  • @sukablianah2 The problem is he states things that the consitution stays out of. "Technology and future advancements' are not meant to be controlled by it, people make those decisions themselves, separate from it. Also, Ron Paul believes in the 'guide lines' set out by it. Whether you like or hate him, he stands by it's guidelines for Liberty, something that is never "outdated" or simply 'unimportant'.

  • oh shit thatt was a sharpie XD love you tj <3

  • 3:37 "every wyomian or wyominian" lol

    I looked into it and they are actually called Wyomingites hehe no seriously though

  • "The Constitution is Perfect and Can not be Improved Upon". Is not what Constitutionalists think... Look at the amendment process of the Constitution, it is there so it CAN be improved upon. When the US banned Alcohol they recognized they needed to amend the Constitution to do so ,a few years later they banned drugs without doing the same... Respect for the Constitution has dwindled over time and it shouldnt have...

  • Yeah he says a few stupid things in this video, which is why he probably deleted it. His argument against the senate is nothing new, but totally stupid. He's advocating for small states and communities to essentially get squashed by California, Florida, Texas, etc just like what happens in Canada, which has led to serious calls for an elected Senate up there and separatist movements in the ignored parts of Canada.

  • Article II Section 2 of the Constitution says that the President is Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces and the Naval Forces, but it doesn't mention an Air Force. I guess under Ron Paul's understanding the Air Force is unconstitutional.

  • @OsirisLord

    Airplanes did not exist in the 1700's?

  • The HOUSE is based on population, the Senate is SUPPOSED to be the same for each state

  • why'd he delete this?

  • @SFforlife Because he was way off in this one. As someone said in his forum (and I'm paraphrasing) TJ is smart enough to realize when he is being a dumbass.

  • Is the NDAA an improvement to the constitution you fat fuck? Go have buttsex with Webber

  • TJ i saw you comique review of the music video of alejandro by lady gaga

    please do more and put them on your main channel, that would be great

  • do you ever think tj hates it when you upload stuff he takes down? haha

  • @andehhhhhhh I doubt it, TJ stated at one point he doesn't give a shit if people upload his old videos. He takes them down because he doesn't like the negative comments on his channel about it, plus all the bad press he gets from them.

  • @andehhhhhhh If TJ had a problem with it, he could've asked TheAmazingTerroja to take down the videos, and sue him if he doesn't. Since TJ deleted them, they are no longer public domain.

  • @andehhhhhhh

    Once your word is out there, it should stay there. It's not up to you to decide. If I delete my own content, it's still censorship and fucking over the content consumers.

  • @andehhhhhhh Yeah he probly does.

  • Why were these videos deleted for his suspension?

  • Wasnt this already posted before??????

  • Could someone tell me why TJ deleted this?

  • @BlackFloyd94 He mentioned in one of his answer videos that he felt that he should've made a much longer video if he wanted to explain the matter. In other words, he thinks he might've been unclear, or at least misinterpreted.

  • The constitution is just one big compromise

  • this is a repeat!! XD jk.... but i did have a feelin that i have seen this before... turns out i was right

  • I’m forced to wonder if TJ has ever heard of the house of representatives.

  • In another video he said that this video wasn't as well thought out as it should be for the topic he's talking about.

  • Why would he delete it?

  • This is something very many Americans need to hear

  • He probably deleted this because he realized how stupid the comment about Supreme Court Justices was

    Supreme court Justices don't have term limits so they don't make decisions made on public protest or self gain. For instance the westboro baptist church protest of funerals that they defended as freedom of speech, which was good. Or the many politicians that get jobs in big corporations after their short term limits because of the deals they make.

  • @unorthodoxJ I will PM on why it is actually fucking stupid to not have term limits. You have such a one sided and narrow mind if you don't think there is a valid argument against it....

  • @TearsOfWar1 Did I ever say there was no valid argument against it? No

    I simply stated that based off the information I've seen I don't agree. If you have a differing POV and would like to PM me I'd love to hear it

    Regardless of anything it is a likely reason why the video was taken down. That or the 2 seats for senate part, which I do see the reason for but can completely see why people feel it needs change.

  • @unorthodoxJ I think it was the house of reps part. I think he felt kinda foolish that he forgot about that... Anyway, I think we need reform of our government structure.

  • @unorthodoxJ

    Citizen's United decision and Justice Scalia are just two examples of why the Supreme Court should be accountable to someone. There are supposed to be checks and balances, but no one can check the supreme court. If the Executive and Legislative branches both disagree with the Supreme Court, tough shit the supreme court isn't accountable to them. It would be one thing if the supreme court couldn't create laws, but with the legal power of "precedence", they do make laws.

  • @unorthodoxJ Correct me if I'm wrong, but I though congressmen and senators didn't have term limits either?

  • @deathtris Sorry this may have been some bad labeling on my part

    By term limit for supreme court it is meant that they serve what is pretty much a life time position without re-election, stepping down when they see fit usually

    Senators can be elected for a long time as well, but the difference is they're put up to a vote every 6 years

  • @unorthodoxJ So you really think the Supreme Court is squeaky clean?

  • @1019079 Certainly not I don't believe any area of government is, but cleaner than most areas yes

  • @unorthodoxJ How exactly? A conservative judge appoints conservative justices and a democrat does the opposite.

  • RIP Cody! :p

  • @803brando A strict constitutionalist doesn't ignore the amendments you know. Its a ground to start on when you aspire to the freedoms your ancestors did. Change at an painfully slow pace but one that makes it difficult for you as it does them! Freedom will never be free. Get off your arses America. Your forefathers gave you a place to regroup. The Constitution. That is the line. The battle for freedom starts there and when you are worm food your children will be one inch closer.

  • if the constitution was absolutely perfect from its inception, then blacks would still be slaves. the fact we had a civil war over whether or not owning another human being is right, and as a result the thirteen amendment was written into the constitution, proves the constitution isnt perfect.

  • @TheNakedAtheist No malice intended. I agree 99.8% of the time with TJ but a 'strict constitutionalist' is easier to argue with than a downright liar. Yes that is a pop at Obama. If I am driving down a bad road I pick the road where I can see that i am driving on the edge against the road I can't see a damn thing. The constitution even strict is better than the NDAA.

  • Why did he take this video down? I have noticed that any video the least bit critical of Ron Paul is immediately attacked by his internet troll strike force.

  • lol

  • I actually just uploaded a video talking about the constitutionality of Euthanasia. Come check it out.

  • Fuck ron paul and all is disciples! Fucking sheeps

  • @xCleverlyx Sheep is plural for sheep.

  • @xCleverlyx you have any better ideas besides being a cynical asshole? last time i checked its either ron paul who actually has SOME good ideas im not sayin ALL of his ideas are perfect but at least its some slight progress 4 america, or you can vote a morman pussy, a homophobic war mongering idiot, or a cooperate lobbiest who divorced his wife with cancer cuz ''she wasnt pretty enough to be first lady'

    or just vote for obama again and have more rights and liberties taken from you.

  • @eliellington lol SOME, good ideas? That's a bit of an exaggeration, don't you say? i say a few.

    But my argument isn't that other candidates are better, Is that most of RP's ideas are CRAZY SHIT and all you paulbots seem to do is, defend him and make him look like a god, with all your trolling and immediate dislikes to any video that opposes any of rp's views, so stfu, get rp balls out of your mouth and wake up. Just cuss he MIGHT be the least shitty candidate, does not make him a good one.

  • @xCleverlyx I'm a Ron Paul supporter, mainly because I hate most of the other candidates plans, however, I would enjoy reading your criticisms of his campaign. I don't see or hear to much against him so, if you wouldn't mind could you explain what the problems are? Thanks in advance.

  • Anyone know why this video was taken down?

  • @TornadoCreator

    Factual inaccuracies that he himself recognized after it was brought to his attention.

  • I hope he's not deleted this because he's supporting Ron Paul now. (Or would support him if he ran against Obama)

  • @GiantSandles he has*

  • Someone tried to say that the Founders were poor dirt farmers! Thomas Jefferson was, adjusted for inflation, the richest man to ever take the oath of office!

  • hey you fucker dont call me stupid just yet! What about the house? that was made so the senate would be balanced out. how would you feel if you lived in a small state and you had 2 votes while some had almost 30. Thats not fair, thats why the house is for population and the senate is to make the small states happy.

  • @EliteDWB-to make the small states happy.

    Umm, and you think that's a good reason???

  • @TheNakedAtheist yeah actually. but then again what tj says is law so fucking ignore that.if you lived in a small state you would agree, and no i dont live in a small state before you ask.

  • @EliteDWB

    So you think using an unjust, unfair system where, given that most bills require approval by both houses of congress, 15% of the population (the 25 lowest population states) has veto power over 85% of us, in order to bribe them into ratifying the constitution, is a good reason to maintain that system. At the time it may have been necessary because states were essentially autonomous countries, but it's not a good reason to maintain it.

  • @TheNakedAtheist i see what you mean. But then again my personal opinion is that we get rid of both houses and the electoral college. The people should get to directly vote on everything. A republic instead of a democracy. this way its fair to everyone, we can cut a lot of corruption, and the whole "Bush incident" doesnt happen again.

  • thanks for uploading this

  • TJ I am going to get blasted for saying this but... The constitution is the only thing that is stopping you from being locked up.... shut up... period. The founding fathers were putting a bloody big wall that government would find it 'difficult' to knock down. The constitution is a starting point for debate for every generation. It wasn't perfect but it was built to last. Its mean't to be difficult so that only those with conviction can change it. Freedom has a price for every generation.

  • @Gothmatix Locked up for what? Anyway, if thay want to lock someone up, they'll do it.

  • Comment removed

  • @Gothmatix-The constitution is the only thing that is stopping you from being locked up.... shut up... period.

    And TAA never said entirely abandon the constitution. he pointed out things that could be improved. For example the main motivation behind having two senators per state despite the size of the state was NOT because it was the best way to fairly represent the people, but because they needed to bribe the smaller state legislatures into ratifying it.

  • I understand what TJ is saying, I happen to agree with him very much. Still, Ron Paul 2012

  • what happeed to cody w?

  • @The12GagePump Cody Webber, as i found out. As I am a real fan of the Amazing Atheist. And watched his Two hour video. He said Cody began to use drugs more, get drunk more, do work less, etc. So he said, be gone with you. Pretty much, and they both went their own way.

  • @cobolt13 which video is that?

  • @000theUnforgiven000 It was on TJ does lift. Can't remember.

  • @000theUnforgiven000 Life....* Lol

  • @cobolt13 he also said that there was nothing more to improve on the videos

  • @cobolt13 what might this video be called, i would like to see it,

  • @cobolt13 where can i watch this video? i haven't seen it

  • @cobolt13 Cody's a bum, I lost all respect for him when I found out he had a daughter he hadn't seen in years and how he never pays alimony or talks to her.

  • @edwardLRS Cody has a daughter?!

  • @fuck1929 Yeah, when TJ posted both of their messages from eachother on his tumblr TJ was saying that Cody has a daughter.

  • @The12GagePump he messed up.

  • @xomiakas you shut the fuck up cunt

  • @The12GagePump What? Again: I'm saying that Cody-fucking Weber messed up big time. Google it, you'll find info on some websute, I can't remember the name of it. Now, you called me a cunt and told me to shut the fuck up for no reason. I must say that you messed up, as you yourself are a worthless piece of shit stale cum bubble, freshly squeezed out of your dead lesbian mothers ass. I bid you adieu, dear sit.

  • @The12GagePump he died

  • @emsakrso shut the fuck up bitch, id slap you.

  • When was this taken away.

  • Gotta thumbs this up a second time. Love the mustache!!! I nearly peed my pants.

  • No man. Cody's dead. The videos uploaded to his channel "Saturninefilms" are made by his twin brother, Body, who murdered Cody and stole his identity after Cody found him chained up in the attic...right?

  • @ListenSilently

    Wow man you got it all wrong

    TJ forced Cody (with his penis) to make a year's worth of videos in advance, and then he murdered him and just uploaded his shit to get a little extra money

    Geez man get your facts straight

  • @TheHeroinWolf

    Odd. I heard he was now the benevolent dictator of the island nation of Unbutuswana, where they worship blonde guitar players. he got the gig according to the rumors after Justin Bieber turned it down.

  • @ListenSilently i thought he got eaten by a velociraptor...

  • @ListenSilently Cody hasn't seemed the same lately anyway so... seems logical. 

  • No youtube took down the rick perry video TJ personally took down this one

  • This is the video that youtube had removed claiming it was spam or something. Glad to see it back up.

  • @SycorTheosPhilos No, that was the Rick Perry video

  • @natmil1 Oh yeah... Then why is this one being reposted?

  • @SycorTheosPhilos TJ (TheAmazingAtheist) deleted it, no one knows why

  • I watched this recently. When did he delete this video?

  • Cody didn't die, you fucking idiots.

  • @sub2me4areview I find it funny anyone took that seriously when TJ said he died.

  • @sub2me4areview

    You are the idiot. We're trying to have a laugh with this guy and you ruin it by thinking any of us seriously thinks Cody is dead. Of course he isn't dead. But thanks for ruining our fun.

  • @SSTTEEAALLTTHH You're welcome.

  • He deleted it?

  • cody died? what????!!!! i don't believe that

  • @kurama10271 I know. RIP eh.

  • @kurama10271

    Yea, pretty sad. Shit happens I guess.

  • @SSTTEEAALLTTHH He didn't die.

  • @6cheesy6

    Of course he didn't, I'm not fucking stupid.

  • Why did he delete it?

  • @TheNeCKro From what I understand, people took him to task for this video because he's invoked the authority of the constitution in the past. He's explained that this particular video didn't adequately explain that he considers the constitution as a "living document" -- that it should be understood and interpreted with a modern perspective. He's likely deleted because he doesn't want that further confusion.

  • Good thing I already save all of TJ's vids to my hard drive.

  • thanks for uploading!

  • anyone know why cody weber is gone????

  • @The12GagePump watch?v=LebAJdZsbNI

    Watch that around 54 minutes.

  • @The12GagePump cody died

  • @JeebuzCrist no he didn't

  • @The12GagePump he is dead

  • TJ's Embarrased what a faggot lol.

  • hey im early

  • lol

  • constitution this, constitution that.

  • moobs <33

  • cats

  • This was deleted? Why?

  • @BrandurJustinussen exact reason why the rick perry one was.... i don't know why