lol wali(helpers) of shaitaan are definetly from wahabies/najdies group...but AlkhAmdolillah All the walies have been purely on the guided path ie Ahlus-Sunnat and in Pak they are called as(Sunni-Brailvi)...it is not possible to produce walies from a hell-bounded sect..never ever
PROPHET MUHAMMAD(saw) SAID NAJD IS DIFFERENT THAT IS IN SAUDI ARABIA AND IRAQ IS DIFFERENT WHICH HAS BEEN NEVER PART Of PROPHETS ARABIA OR SAUDI ARABIA IN MODERN TIMES (proven in the Sahih Muslim Hadith Prophet Made different miqats for Najd and Iraq for Hajj )
U INSANE WAHHABI LIARS NOW U WANT TO ARGUE WITH PROPHET MUHAMMAD(SAW) AND TEACH HIM NAJD IS IRAQ ?
FIRST TELL ME ANSWER TO A SIMPLE QUESTION WHERE WAS IBN ABDUL WAHHAB BORN IN IRAQ OR NAJD SAUDI ARABIA ?
Imam Muslim iN Sahih Muslim(Hajj, narrates a similar hadith: Prophet Muhammad(sw) said for the people of Madina it is Dhul-Hulayfa - while on the other road it is al-Juhfa - for the people of IRAQ it is Dhat Irq, for the people of NAJD it is Qarn, and for the people of Yemen it is Yalamlam.
These SAHI HADITHS constitute unarguable proof that the Prophet (s.w.s.) distinguished between Najd and Iraq, so much so that he appointed two separate miqat points for the inhabitants of each for Hajj.
Lol Its a nice theory to keep oneself happy and in deception but not True:-
Modern geography is very advanced so draw a line to EAST straight from Madina al Munawwara and see it passes somewhere north of Riyadh, which is exactly the center of NAJD, The books and Scholars that they are taking into consider Iraq is no where a "raised" land, neither it is neither high nor upland study Iraq geography, its plain land but the original NAJD is raised so it means exactly what its named of.
also ibn ghannam, a very respected source amongst sons of ibn abdel wahhab till this day, and who was a very close companion of ibn abdel wahhab himself, he writes in his tarikh najd boastfully, how ibn abdelwahhab and muhammad ibn saud pillaged villages in arabia, killed innocent civilians under the pretix of them being mushriks, and how they even charged "taxes" upon those villages that even accepted their wahhabi call. May Allah give ibn abdel wahhab what he deserves.
The Ottomans were the last of the Khalifah. That was the only thing we had. Look at us now. We are broken. And the rift getting deeper. The Ottomans were not corrupt. Their people might've been. But not the Ottomans.
Why Ibn Abdul Wahhab is being called as devil one may ask ? if u read the history how Arabia was made into Saudi Arabia adding the name of one deviant Family to the land of Prophet Making it from Arabia to Saudi Arabia is itself the Proof of self worship , pride and deviant nature of this Wahhabi Saud Family and there passionate supporter Ibn Abdul Wahhab Najdi who also happened to be the brother in law of Saud family - not to mention they have made Najd (Riyadh) their Capital instead of Medina
37 - 'Abd al-'Aziz ibn Muhammad( Saud), who ruthlessly massacred Muslims in order to disseminate Wahhabism, sent three Wahhabis to Mecca in 1210 A.H. (1795). The 'ulama' of Ahl as-Sunnat responded to them with ayats and hadiths and the Wahhabite representatives could not make any rejoinder. They could not find any way out but to admit the truth. They wrote and signed a long declaration which stated that Ahl as-Sunnat was right and that they themselves were on a wrong,
aberrant path. But 'Abd al-'Aziz did not even lend an ear to the advice of the men of religious authority, for he was running after political ambitions and had set his heart on increasing the taste of his chieftain. He increased his torture of the Muslims day by day behind the curtain of religiousness.
The three Wahhabis were extremely sure that they were right in their second belief. They said, "Muslims in Mecca visit the graves of Rasulullah (sall-Allahu 'alaihi wa sallam), 'Abdullah ibn 'Abbas and Mahjub and say, 'Oh Rasul-Allah!' or 'Oh Ibn 'Abbas!' or 'Oh Mahjub!' [Mahjub Sayyid Abd ar-Rahman.
the most profound alim of his time, passed away in 1204 A.H. (1790) and was buried in the Mu'alla Cemetery.] However, according to our imam Ibn 'Abd al-Wahhab's ijtihad, those who say, 'La ilaha illa'llah Muhammadun Rasulullah,' but pray to a person other than Allah become disbelievers.
It is halal to kill them and confiscate their possessions." The 'ulama' of Ahl as-Sunnat said in reply: "Visiting the graves of Allahu ta'ala's beloved servants to make tawassul of them or to ask them to pray does not mean worshiping them.
They are visited not with the intention of worshiping them but with the purpose of asking Allahu ta'ala by making them wasila, that is, holding on to them as causes and intermediaries." And they proved with documents that it was permissible and even necessary to hold on to the causes.
THE MASSACRE AND LOOTING OF THE MUSLIMS OF TA'IF When the 'ulama' of Ahl as-Sunnat silenced the Wahhabis in 1210 A.H. (1796), the 'ulama' of Mecca prepared and signed a declaration containing the ayats and hadiths which showed that Wahhabism was a path different from Islam, a trap insidiously set up by the enemies of Islam to demolish Islam from the inside.
The three Wahhabis who repented of their beliefs ratified this document. The copies of the declaration were then sent to all Muslim countries.
Some Meccan Wahhabis went to 'Abd al-'Aziz, the ruler in Dar'iyya, and told him that the representatives could not refute the Meccan 'ulama' and that a declaration stating that their system of beliefs was hostility against Islam was sent to every country.
'Abd al-'Aziz ibn Muhammad ibn Sa'ud and his followers bitterly resented the Ahl as-Sunnat and attacked Mecca in 1215. The Amir of Mecca, Sharif Ghalib ibn Musa'id ibn Said Effendi, resisted them. Much blood was shed on both sides. Sharif Ghalib Effendi did not allow them to enter Mecca, but the Arab tribes around Mecca accepted Wahhabism. Between the two 'eeds of the same year, Sa'ud sent an army to the town of Ta'if. They oppressed and massacred Ta'ifian Muslim women and children.
[For the details of this oppression and massacre which is unbearable to the heart, see Ahmad ibn Zaini Dahlan's Khulasat al-kalam (reprint, Istanbul, 1395/1975) and Ayyub Sabri Pasha's Tarikh-i Wahhabiyyan, Istanbul, 1296 A.H. (1879).]
The torture of the inhabitants of Ta'if, including women and children, was committed by the order of an enemy of Islam, a ferocious brigand named 'Uthman al-Mudayiqi.
the Wahhabis gathered the people, who had set out to migrate, on a hill and encircled those pure Muslim families, who had grown up amid fondling and affection and most of whom were women and children, and held them to die of hunger and thirst for twelve days, and tortured them by slandering, stoning and cudgeling. The Wahhabis called them one by one and beat them and said, "Tell us where you hid your possessions!" and howled, "Your day of death is coming!" to those who begged for mercy.
Wahhabi Ibn Shakban, after pressing the stone houses violently for twelve days and being unable to make them yield, promised that those who would come out of the houses and give up arms would be forgiven. Muslims believed him and came out, but, with their hands tied behind their backs, they were drawn by Ibn Shakban to the hill where the other Muslims were encircled. Three hundred and sixty-seven men, together with women and children, were put to the sword on the hill
They plundered Muslims' houses and gathered all they took into a big heap in front of the gateway of the fortress and sent one fifth of the goods and the money they collected to Sa'ud, sharing the remainder among themselves. The traitors and torrential rains swept away uncountable money and invaluable goods, and there remained little, only forty thousand gold rials, in the hands of Ahl as-Sunnat; ten thousand rials were distributed to the women and children, and the goods were sold very cheaply.
Three hundred and sixty-seven Muslim men, together with women and children, were put to the sword on the hill by the Wahhabi. They made animals trample on the bodies of the martyrs and left them unburied to be eaten by beasts and birds of prey for sixteen days.
The Wahhabis tore up the copies of the Qur'an al-karim and books of tafsir, hadith and other Islamic books they took from libraries, masjids and houses, and threw them down on the ground. They made sandals from the gold-gilded leather covers of the Qur'an copies and other books and wore them on their filthy feet. There were ayats and other sacred writings on those leather covers. The leaves of those valuable books thrown around were so numerous that there was no space to step in Ta'if.
a mujiza: The weather was calm during the plunder of Ta'if. There was no wind. a storm broke out after the bandits went away, and the wind lifted up all the leaves of the Qur'an al-karim and Islamic books and swept them away. soon there was no piece of paper left on the ground. Nobody knew where they were taken.
Under the hot sun, the corpses of the martyrs decayed on the hill in sixteen days. The atmosphere became fetid. Muslims begged, wept and lamented in front of Ibn Shakban Wahhabi to permit them to bury their dead relatives. At last he agreed, and they dug two big hollows, put all the decayed corpses of their fathers, grandfathers, relatives and children into the hollows and covered them with soil.
There was no corpse that could be recognized; some of them were only one half or one fourth of a body, for other parts were scattered around by birds and beasts of prey. They were permitted to collect and bury these pieces of flesh because the bad smell bothered the Wahhabis, too. Muslims searched all around and collected and buried them, too, in the two hollows.
The Wahhabi bandits completely ruined the shrines of as-Sahabat al-kiram, awliya' and 'ulama' after putting the Muslims of Ta'if to the sword and dividing up the loot and the money. When they attempted to dig a grave with a view to take out and burn the corpse of Hadrat 'Abdullah ibn 'Abbas (r), who was one of our Prophet's most beloved companions, they were frightened by the pleasant scent that came out when the first pickaxe hit the ground.
The Wahhabi said, "There is a great Satan (Hadrat 'Abdullah ibn 'Abbas (r)), in this grave. We should blow it up with dynamite instead of losing time by digging." Although they put much powder and tried hard, the powder misfired and they went away in astonishment. The grave was left level with the ground for a few years.
Later, Sayyid Yasin Effendi put a very nice sarcophagus on it and protected that blessed grave from being forgotten.
The bandits also tried to dig up the graves of Sayyid 'Abd al-Hadi Effendi and many other awliya', but they were prevented by a karama at each grave. Facing extraordinary difficulties in carrying out this vile intention of theirs, they gave it up.
Uthman al-Mudayiqi wahhabi and Ibn Shakban wahhabi also ordered that the mosques and madrasas should be demolished together with the shrines. Yasin Effendi, a great scholar of Ahl as-Sunnat, said, "Why do you want to demolish mosques, which are built for the purpose of performing salat in congregation? If you want to ruin this mosque because the grave of 'Abdullah ibn 'Abbas (radi-Allahu 'anhuma) is here, I tell you, his grave is in the shrine outside the big mosque.
Therefore, it is not necessary to demolish the mosque." 'Uthman al-Mudayiqi wahhabi and Ibn Shakban wahhabi could not make any rejoinder. But, Matu, a zindiq among them, made a ridiculous statement: "Anything doubtful should be annihilated." Then, Yasin Effendi asked, "Is there anything doubtful about mosques?" and the demagogue was silent. After a long silence, 'Uthman al-Budayiqi said, "I do not agree with either of you," and ordered, "Do not touch the mosque, demolish the shrine!"
THE WAHHABIS IN MADINA Sulaiman Khan I, the seventy-fifth Khalifa of Islam and the tenth Ottoman Sultan (rahmat-Allahi 'alaih) had restored the walls around the blessed city of Medina; the city had not suffered any assault of bandits for 274 years owing to its strong walls, and Muslims had lived in comfort and peace in the city till early 1222 A.H. (1807), when they fell prey to the hands of Sa'ud.
Sa'ud sent the looters he raised from the villages to Medina after capturing al-Makkat al-Mukarrama and the villages around it. He appointed two brothers named Baday and Nadi as commanders of the looters. They plundered the Muslim villages on their way and killed many Muslims. Most of the villages around Medina were set to fire and demolished. The Muslims who were on the right path shown by the 'ulama' of Ahl as-Sunnat were looted and put to the sword.
There were so many villages burnt and Muslims killed that nobody could make an approximate estimate. The villages around Medina accepted the Wahhabite beliefs for fear of plunder, torture and death. They became servants and slaves to Sa'ud.
As soon as he entered Medina, Sa'ud ordered the servants of shrines themselves to demolish the shrines. Although the Muslims had demolished many noble shrines as required by the third clause of the terms accepted three years before, they had not dared to touch a few shrines which they knew to be great and blessed. The servants of these shrines started demolishing them while weeping and lamenting.
The servant of Hadrat Hamza's (radi-'Allahu 'anh) shrine said he was very old and could not do anything, and Sa'ud ordered a treacherous slave of his to demolish the shrine. That person climbed up the dome to start demolishing it but fell down and died, and Sa'ud, the filthy, gave up demolishing Hadrat Hamza's (r) shrine, yet he had its door removed.
After supervising the operation of this base order of his, he made a speech on the dais constructed in Manaha Place. He said that the Medinans did not want to obey him, but became munafiqs out of fear and wanted to go on being polytheists as before. He added, in a very ugly and impertinent voice, that those who took refuge in the fortress should come and show humility, and that those who did not come would suffer the "Wahhabite justice" performed in Ta'if.
Sa'ud ordered his bandits to Without even a tremble of his dark, stony heart, he let his bandits plunder the precious gifts; the works of art of great historical value; invaluable pieces of art gilded with gold and inlaid with jewels and with precious stones; and select copies of the Qur'an al-karim and rare books, which had been kept in Rasulullah's (s)blessed shrine and in the treasure of Masjid an-Nabawi
The fire of hatred in Saud against the Muslims of Medina did not calm down even after this shameful vileness of his, and he went on demolishing the remaining graves belonging to the Sahabis and martyrs. Although he attempted to demolish the dome of Rasulullah's(s) blessed shrine, the Muslims' cries and entreaties made him give up; yet he ruined the Shabakat as-Saada, fortunately not touching the walls.
All these violence and persecution of Muslims by the Njadi Saudi Kings and thier Scholar Ibn Abdul Wahhab Najdi who not only killed Muslims , raped their women and did not even spare their children including the Muslims of Holy Cities of Mecca and Medina .What more fitnah and devilish behavior can exeed this fitnah from Najd declaring Muslims as Kafirs/Mushrik /Bidati by these Wahhabi/Salafi/ and killing and raping their women - is not Ibn Abdul Wahhab and Saud family from Najd DEVIL
Not to mention the destruction of graves and disrespect shown tot he great companions graves the greatest Salaf - and the demolish the Prophets Grave fatwa by Saud, Albani , Bin Baaz, Ibn Abdul Wahhab Najdi,and the recent destruction of Hadrat Khatija(r)House and making toilets over the house of mother of all believers by these Saudi Najdi and Destroyinf of the grave of Prophets (s) Mother Amina(r)by the Saudi Najdi is enough prove that the Devil and fitnah from Najd in Hadith are Wahhabi/Salafi
Wahhabi/Salafi are follwers of the DEVIL from Njad Ibn Abdul Wahhab Najdi and the Saud family also from Najd and thier pupet Islamic Scholars like Bin Baaz , Uthmaeen, Albani , Bilal Philips etc etc
all the blind followers of ibn abdul wahab and other scholars like albani,garbage bin baz, bil phil etc are the khwarij of this time, all muslims shud stay away from these devils. Knowledge of islam is the only cure for this problem, unfortunately wahabis are only interested in kitab ut tawheed and the fatwas from their deviant scholars.We shud follow the quran and sunnah,the sahaba and the salaf, not some imbeciles identifying themselves as salafi.
Great Video...Thanx For Uploding
DargaheIshq 2 years ago 5
We too have a wali to complete with the Sufis and Bareilwis.
binbaaznajdi 3 years ago
lol wali(helpers) of shaitaan are definetly from wahabies/najdies group...but AlkhAmdolillah All the walies have been purely on the guided path ie Ahlus-Sunnat and in Pak they are called as(Sunni-Brailvi)...it is not possible to produce walies from a hell-bounded sect..never ever
RealNoorTv 3 years ago 11
PROPHET MUHAMMAD(saw) SAID NAJD IS DIFFERENT THAT IS IN SAUDI ARABIA AND IRAQ IS DIFFERENT WHICH HAS BEEN NEVER PART Of PROPHETS ARABIA OR SAUDI ARABIA IN MODERN TIMES (proven in the Sahih Muslim Hadith Prophet Made different miqats for Najd and Iraq for Hajj )
U INSANE WAHHABI LIARS NOW U WANT TO ARGUE WITH PROPHET MUHAMMAD(SAW) AND TEACH HIM NAJD IS IRAQ ?
FIRST TELL ME ANSWER TO A SIMPLE QUESTION WHERE WAS IBN ABDUL WAHHAB BORN IN IRAQ OR NAJD SAUDI ARABIA ?
muslimunited2 3 years ago 17
Imam Muslim iN Sahih Muslim(Hajj, narrates a similar hadith: Prophet Muhammad(sw) said for the people of Madina it is Dhul-Hulayfa - while on the other road it is al-Juhfa - for the people of IRAQ it is Dhat Irq, for the people of NAJD it is Qarn, and for the people of Yemen it is Yalamlam.
These SAHI HADITHS constitute unarguable proof that the Prophet (s.w.s.) distinguished between Najd and Iraq, so much so that he appointed two separate miqat points for the inhabitants of each for Hajj.
muslimunited2 3 years ago 5
Lol Its a nice theory to keep oneself happy and in deception but not True:-
Modern geography is very advanced so draw a line to EAST straight from Madina al Munawwara and see it passes somewhere north of Riyadh, which is exactly the center of NAJD, The books and Scholars that they are taking into consider Iraq is no where a "raised" land, neither it is neither high nor upland study Iraq geography, its plain land but the original NAJD is raised so it means exactly what its named of.
samsheyma 3 years ago 7
Jazkhallah
sajjaddar 3 years ago
also ibn ghannam, a very respected source amongst sons of ibn abdel wahhab till this day, and who was a very close companion of ibn abdel wahhab himself, he writes in his tarikh najd boastfully, how ibn abdelwahhab and muhammad ibn saud pillaged villages in arabia, killed innocent civilians under the pretix of them being mushriks, and how they even charged "taxes" upon those villages that even accepted their wahhabi call. May Allah give ibn abdel wahhab what he deserves.
aazarinni 3 years ago 5
The Ottomans were corrupt and not fit to be Khalifah.
AbdullahIslam7 3 years ago
the Ottomans were ruling a long time before you woblis, and would stil be ruling if you didnt come along.
xiffyx 3 years ago 21
lets not forget.. they aided the Kuffaar (British Colonialists) see LAWRENCE OF ARABIA..
Sorry Mr Wahabi - we dont take religion from people who rebelled against the Islamic state along with their British masters.
Read up on your own history!!!!!
The Ottoman Empire was not a Khilafat - it was a Sultanate - and the best thing we could even dream of right now!!!
qadrimuslim 3 years ago 12
They are not ! They the Ottomans are protector of Islam until the wahabi aided the kafirins to destroy them.
hafiidz3 2 years ago 24
The Ottomans were the last of the Khalifah. That was the only thing we had. Look at us now. We are broken. And the rift getting deeper. The Ottomans were not corrupt. Their people might've been. But not the Ottomans.
ZEOtheguardian 2 years ago 7
Why Ibn Abdul Wahhab is being called as devil one may ask ? if u read the history how Arabia was made into Saudi Arabia adding the name of one deviant Family to the land of Prophet Making it from Arabia to Saudi Arabia is itself the Proof of self worship , pride and deviant nature of this Wahhabi Saud Family and there passionate supporter Ibn Abdul Wahhab Najdi who also happened to be the brother in law of Saud family - not to mention they have made Najd (Riyadh) their Capital instead of Medina
muslimunited2 3 years ago 4
THE FIRST WAHHABI MISSION
37 - 'Abd al-'Aziz ibn Muhammad( Saud), who ruthlessly massacred Muslims in order to disseminate Wahhabism, sent three Wahhabis to Mecca in 1210 A.H. (1795). The 'ulama' of Ahl as-Sunnat responded to them with ayats and hadiths and the Wahhabite representatives could not make any rejoinder. They could not find any way out but to admit the truth. They wrote and signed a long declaration which stated that Ahl as-Sunnat was right and that they themselves were on a wrong,
muslimunited2 3 years ago
aberrant path. But 'Abd al-'Aziz did not even lend an ear to the advice of the men of religious authority, for he was running after political ambitions and had set his heart on increasing the taste of his chieftain. He increased his torture of the Muslims day by day behind the curtain of religiousness.
muslimunited2 3 years ago
The three Wahhabis were extremely sure that they were right in their second belief. They said, "Muslims in Mecca visit the graves of Rasulullah (sall-Allahu 'alaihi wa sallam), 'Abdullah ibn 'Abbas and Mahjub and say, 'Oh Rasul-Allah!' or 'Oh Ibn 'Abbas!' or 'Oh Mahjub!' [Mahjub Sayyid Abd ar-Rahman.
muslimunited2 3 years ago
the most profound alim of his time, passed away in 1204 A.H. (1790) and was buried in the Mu'alla Cemetery.] However, according to our imam Ibn 'Abd al-Wahhab's ijtihad, those who say, 'La ilaha illa'llah Muhammadun Rasulullah,' but pray to a person other than Allah become disbelievers.
muslimunited2 3 years ago
It is halal to kill them and confiscate their possessions." The 'ulama' of Ahl as-Sunnat said in reply: "Visiting the graves of Allahu ta'ala's beloved servants to make tawassul of them or to ask them to pray does not mean worshiping them.
muslimunited2 3 years ago
They are visited not with the intention of worshiping them but with the purpose of asking Allahu ta'ala by making them wasila, that is, holding on to them as causes and intermediaries." And they proved with documents that it was permissible and even necessary to hold on to the causes.
muslimunited2 3 years ago
THE MASSACRE AND LOOTING OF THE MUSLIMS OF TA'IF When the 'ulama' of Ahl as-Sunnat silenced the Wahhabis in 1210 A.H. (1796), the 'ulama' of Mecca prepared and signed a declaration containing the ayats and hadiths which showed that Wahhabism was a path different from Islam, a trap insidiously set up by the enemies of Islam to demolish Islam from the inside.
muslimunited2 3 years ago
The three Wahhabis who repented of their beliefs ratified this document. The copies of the declaration were then sent to all Muslim countries.
Some Meccan Wahhabis went to 'Abd al-'Aziz, the ruler in Dar'iyya, and told him that the representatives could not refute the Meccan 'ulama' and that a declaration stating that their system of beliefs was hostility against Islam was sent to every country.
muslimunited2 3 years ago
'Abd al-'Aziz ibn Muhammad ibn Sa'ud and his followers bitterly resented the Ahl as-Sunnat and attacked Mecca in 1215. The Amir of Mecca, Sharif Ghalib ibn Musa'id ibn Said Effendi, resisted them. Much blood was shed on both sides. Sharif Ghalib Effendi did not allow them to enter Mecca, but the Arab tribes around Mecca accepted Wahhabism. Between the two 'eeds of the same year, Sa'ud sent an army to the town of Ta'if. They oppressed and massacred Ta'ifian Muslim women and children.
muslimunited2 3 years ago
[For the details of this oppression and massacre which is unbearable to the heart, see Ahmad ibn Zaini Dahlan's Khulasat al-kalam (reprint, Istanbul, 1395/1975) and Ayyub Sabri Pasha's Tarikh-i Wahhabiyyan, Istanbul, 1296 A.H. (1879).]
The torture of the inhabitants of Ta'if, including women and children, was committed by the order of an enemy of Islam, a ferocious brigand named 'Uthman al-Mudayiqi.
muslimunited2 3 years ago
the Wahhabis gathered the people, who had set out to migrate, on a hill and encircled those pure Muslim families, who had grown up amid fondling and affection and most of whom were women and children, and held them to die of hunger and thirst for twelve days, and tortured them by slandering, stoning and cudgeling. The Wahhabis called them one by one and beat them and said, "Tell us where you hid your possessions!" and howled, "Your day of death is coming!" to those who begged for mercy.
muslimunited2 3 years ago
Wahhabi Ibn Shakban, after pressing the stone houses violently for twelve days and being unable to make them yield, promised that those who would come out of the houses and give up arms would be forgiven. Muslims believed him and came out, but, with their hands tied behind their backs, they were drawn by Ibn Shakban to the hill where the other Muslims were encircled. Three hundred and sixty-seven men, together with women and children, were put to the sword on the hill
muslimunited2 3 years ago
They plundered Muslims' houses and gathered all they took into a big heap in front of the gateway of the fortress and sent one fifth of the goods and the money they collected to Sa'ud, sharing the remainder among themselves. The traitors and torrential rains swept away uncountable money and invaluable goods, and there remained little, only forty thousand gold rials, in the hands of Ahl as-Sunnat; ten thousand rials were distributed to the women and children, and the goods were sold very cheaply.
muslimunited2 3 years ago
Three hundred and sixty-seven Muslim men, together with women and children, were put to the sword on the hill by the Wahhabi. They made animals trample on the bodies of the martyrs and left them unburied to be eaten by beasts and birds of prey for sixteen days.
muslimunited2 3 years ago
The Wahhabis tore up the copies of the Qur'an al-karim and books of tafsir, hadith and other Islamic books they took from libraries, masjids and houses, and threw them down on the ground. They made sandals from the gold-gilded leather covers of the Qur'an copies and other books and wore them on their filthy feet. There were ayats and other sacred writings on those leather covers. The leaves of those valuable books thrown around were so numerous that there was no space to step in Ta'if.
muslimunited2 3 years ago
a mujiza: The weather was calm during the plunder of Ta'if. There was no wind. a storm broke out after the bandits went away, and the wind lifted up all the leaves of the Qur'an al-karim and Islamic books and swept them away. soon there was no piece of paper left on the ground. Nobody knew where they were taken.
muslimunited2 3 years ago
Under the hot sun, the corpses of the martyrs decayed on the hill in sixteen days. The atmosphere became fetid. Muslims begged, wept and lamented in front of Ibn Shakban Wahhabi to permit them to bury their dead relatives. At last he agreed, and they dug two big hollows, put all the decayed corpses of their fathers, grandfathers, relatives and children into the hollows and covered them with soil.
muslimunited2 3 years ago
There was no corpse that could be recognized; some of them were only one half or one fourth of a body, for other parts were scattered around by birds and beasts of prey. They were permitted to collect and bury these pieces of flesh because the bad smell bothered the Wahhabis, too. Muslims searched all around and collected and buried them, too, in the two hollows.
muslimunited2 3 years ago
The Wahhabi bandits completely ruined the shrines of as-Sahabat al-kiram, awliya' and 'ulama' after putting the Muslims of Ta'if to the sword and dividing up the loot and the money. When they attempted to dig a grave with a view to take out and burn the corpse of Hadrat 'Abdullah ibn 'Abbas (r), who was one of our Prophet's most beloved companions, they were frightened by the pleasant scent that came out when the first pickaxe hit the ground.
muslimunited2 3 years ago
The Wahhabi said, "There is a great Satan (Hadrat 'Abdullah ibn 'Abbas (r)), in this grave. We should blow it up with dynamite instead of losing time by digging." Although they put much powder and tried hard, the powder misfired and they went away in astonishment. The grave was left level with the ground for a few years.
muslimunited2 3 years ago
Later, Sayyid Yasin Effendi put a very nice sarcophagus on it and protected that blessed grave from being forgotten.
The bandits also tried to dig up the graves of Sayyid 'Abd al-Hadi Effendi and many other awliya', but they were prevented by a karama at each grave. Facing extraordinary difficulties in carrying out this vile intention of theirs, they gave it up.
muslimunited2 3 years ago
Uthman al-Mudayiqi wahhabi and Ibn Shakban wahhabi also ordered that the mosques and madrasas should be demolished together with the shrines. Yasin Effendi, a great scholar of Ahl as-Sunnat, said, "Why do you want to demolish mosques, which are built for the purpose of performing salat in congregation? If you want to ruin this mosque because the grave of 'Abdullah ibn 'Abbas (radi-Allahu 'anhuma) is here, I tell you, his grave is in the shrine outside the big mosque.
muslimunited2 3 years ago
Therefore, it is not necessary to demolish the mosque." 'Uthman al-Mudayiqi wahhabi and Ibn Shakban wahhabi could not make any rejoinder. But, Matu, a zindiq among them, made a ridiculous statement: "Anything doubtful should be annihilated." Then, Yasin Effendi asked, "Is there anything doubtful about mosques?" and the demagogue was silent. After a long silence, 'Uthman al-Budayiqi said, "I do not agree with either of you," and ordered, "Do not touch the mosque, demolish the shrine!"
muslimunited2 3 years ago
THE WAHHABIS IN MADINA Sulaiman Khan I, the seventy-fifth Khalifa of Islam and the tenth Ottoman Sultan (rahmat-Allahi 'alaih) had restored the walls around the blessed city of Medina; the city had not suffered any assault of bandits for 274 years owing to its strong walls, and Muslims had lived in comfort and peace in the city till early 1222 A.H. (1807), when they fell prey to the hands of Sa'ud.
muslimunited2 3 years ago 2
Sa'ud sent the looters he raised from the villages to Medina after capturing al-Makkat al-Mukarrama and the villages around it. He appointed two brothers named Baday and Nadi as commanders of the looters. They plundered the Muslim villages on their way and killed many Muslims. Most of the villages around Medina were set to fire and demolished. The Muslims who were on the right path shown by the 'ulama' of Ahl as-Sunnat were looted and put to the sword.
muslimunited2 3 years ago 4
There were so many villages burnt and Muslims killed that nobody could make an approximate estimate. The villages around Medina accepted the Wahhabite beliefs for fear of plunder, torture and death. They became servants and slaves to Sa'ud.
muslimunited2 3 years ago 3
As soon as he entered Medina, Sa'ud ordered the servants of shrines themselves to demolish the shrines. Although the Muslims had demolished many noble shrines as required by the third clause of the terms accepted three years before, they had not dared to touch a few shrines which they knew to be great and blessed. The servants of these shrines started demolishing them while weeping and lamenting.
muslimunited2 3 years ago 4
The servant of Hadrat Hamza's (radi-'Allahu 'anh) shrine said he was very old and could not do anything, and Sa'ud ordered a treacherous slave of his to demolish the shrine. That person climbed up the dome to start demolishing it but fell down and died, and Sa'ud, the filthy, gave up demolishing Hadrat Hamza's (r) shrine, yet he had its door removed.
muslimunited2 3 years ago
After supervising the operation of this base order of his, he made a speech on the dais constructed in Manaha Place. He said that the Medinans did not want to obey him, but became munafiqs out of fear and wanted to go on being polytheists as before. He added, in a very ugly and impertinent voice, that those who took refuge in the fortress should come and show humility, and that those who did not come would suffer the "Wahhabite justice" performed in Ta'if.
muslimunited2 3 years ago
Sa'ud ordered his bandits to Without even a tremble of his dark, stony heart, he let his bandits plunder the precious gifts; the works of art of great historical value; invaluable pieces of art gilded with gold and inlaid with jewels and with precious stones; and select copies of the Qur'an al-karim and rare books, which had been kept in Rasulullah's (s)blessed shrine and in the treasure of Masjid an-Nabawi
muslimunited2 3 years ago
The fire of hatred in Saud against the Muslims of Medina did not calm down even after this shameful vileness of his, and he went on demolishing the remaining graves belonging to the Sahabis and martyrs. Although he attempted to demolish the dome of Rasulullah's(s) blessed shrine, the Muslims' cries and entreaties made him give up; yet he ruined the Shabakat as-Saada, fortunately not touching the walls.
muslimunited2 3 years ago 2
All these violence and persecution of Muslims by the Njadi Saudi Kings and thier Scholar Ibn Abdul Wahhab Najdi who not only killed Muslims , raped their women and did not even spare their children including the Muslims of Holy Cities of Mecca and Medina .What more fitnah and devilish behavior can exeed this fitnah from Najd declaring Muslims as Kafirs/Mushrik /Bidati by these Wahhabi/Salafi/ and killing and raping their women - is not Ibn Abdul Wahhab and Saud family from Najd DEVIL
muslimunited2 3 years ago 2
Not to mention the destruction of graves and disrespect shown tot he great companions graves the greatest Salaf - and the demolish the Prophets Grave fatwa by Saud, Albani , Bin Baaz, Ibn Abdul Wahhab Najdi,and the recent destruction of Hadrat Khatija(r)House and making toilets over the house of mother of all believers by these Saudi Najdi and Destroyinf of the grave of Prophets (s) Mother Amina(r)by the Saudi Najdi is enough prove that the Devil and fitnah from Najd in Hadith are Wahhabi/Salafi
muslimunited2 3 years ago
Wahhabi/Salafi are follwers of the DEVIL from Njad Ibn Abdul Wahhab Najdi and the Saud family also from Najd and thier pupet Islamic Scholars like Bin Baaz , Uthmaeen, Albani , Bilal Philips etc etc
muslimunited2 3 years ago 4
Wahabis are the outcome of british spy Humphray. They are the Khawrjis of 19th century and onword
ExposingNifaq 3 years ago 3
all the blind followers of ibn abdul wahab and other scholars like albani,garbage bin baz, bil phil etc are the khwarij of this time, all muslims shud stay away from these devils. Knowledge of islam is the only cure for this problem, unfortunately wahabis are only interested in kitab ut tawheed and the fatwas from their deviant scholars.We shud follow the quran and sunnah,the sahaba and the salaf, not some imbeciles identifying themselves as salafi.
alfesaani 3 years ago 6
Wahhabism is heretic. They have separated from the aqida of Ahl Sunna.
faruk715 3 years ago 5