Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (373)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Waste of time.

    Never gonna happen, no country is ever going to give up 100% of their nukes.

    Especially North Korea!

    The existence of north Korea would stop this campaign in its tracks.

  • I say fuck the middle east. Oh but they have our oil (whimper). America has the determination to do anything but we only use it when we have to. If we were to stop trading for oil and start making more cars that use no oil 1. Green car prices go down. 2a. We can sell these cars to other countries. 2b. We then reduce national debt. America is at war in Iraq for oil because we are addicted to it. The U.S. needs to get off the oil tit which is the middle east. Then this war can be done with.

  • @Death1458100 Hey buddy, you notice that the technology is there yet? We need oil, we have shit tons of oil in the United States but wackos won't let us drill. We need to get off oil, but for the next 50 years (yeah I said 50) we need oil. Green cars won't be mainstream for a long time. Where the hell does the electricity come from buddy?

  • @TheNotoriousGamer It's business if you cut oil and tell the car companies to use renewable energy then they will be forced too or go out of business. You want to know where to get energy lets see rivers, wind, hydrogen, solar, helium, nuclear. We have these at our disposal but we refuse to use them. We have the technology NASA sends astronauts into space by using a combination of Hydrogen and Oxygen. So please don't tell me that technology is holding us back.

  • How do you dispose of nuclear bombs?

  • a video about attentionwhores ? or did i miss somthing?

  • Mutual Assured Destruction

    

  • bummm bum the world is going to do if you continous making enemies interfering with govermentys

  • good sir, there will always be a secret stash of nuclear weapons in the world. Go drinks some hot chocolate instead:)

  • Are you fucking stupid? Do you really think countries like China will get rid of their nukes? Do you want us all to die???? Go fuck yourself.

  • damn jews

    

  • Why is it so hard for human beings to get along....superior than animals?...I don't think so!

  • ( HUMAN KINDNESS WALK ACROSS AMERICA ) IM WALKING FROM CALIFORNIA TO NEW YORK AND BACK HELPING HOMELESS FAMILIES GET HOMES TO CHANGE LIVES PROMOTHING HUMAN KINDNESS. IM TRYING TO CHANGE R WORLD PLEASE CHECK OUT MY VIDEO'S AND SEE WHAT I MEAN ,THANK U SO FAR 400 FAMILIES NOW HAVE A PLACE TO LIVE ,IN THE SPRING IM WALKING BACK TO CALIFORNIA FROM NEW YORK I ALREADY WALKED FROM CALIF TO NY, HELP ME CHANGE THE WORLD WITH A THUMBS UP IF U WANT TO CHANGE IT ?

  • The middle east is a grave threat, those people are psycos, but even greater than that, illuminati

  • How stupid is it to own a weapon that not only kills your perceived enemy but yourself? I think the use of nuclear weapons must be banned.

  • "Fighting for peace is like screwing for virginity."-George Carlin

  • @StupidNiggerPoop Your mother got gangbanged by 50 guys. You were born out of a semen curry of fifty men. That's why you are this stupid my nigger.

  • @osiud Your an arrogant prick.

  • 60k nuclear warheads to 20k. Ok, so what happened to the radioactive material inside the 40k warheads that destroyed?

  • @mykenmoon Haha good point. They probably put it in the ocean.

  • dam leonarldolauarnce and precal 22 are right wow lol

  • I disagree... why would any government launch several nuclear missiles at another country knowing that they would start world war 3?

  • what a naive populist....or a populist using naive ppl....dunno what -.-

  • nuke israel first

  • the world needs to start all over again

    with out firearms and nuclear weapons ..man kind does nothing but like to kill one another , 

  • both sides are correct, you cant lose this argument

  • @StupidNiggerPoop

    Thats ridiculous nuclear weapons damage the land for years to come. Theres a very real chance that humans could literally wipe themselves out with nukes.

  • When You think of the gravest threats to man you think of the middle east!? WTF, you should think of the USA.

  • Nukes should be banned but we all know that will never happen. Why waste your time living in fantasy land.

  • @santran lol banning nukes would be seriously bad....

  • they r just wasting their time. . . .

  • Abolish government, problem solved.

  • @geoedwar84 Thats just like saying "extinguish the sun, problem solved" for ending global warming.

  • @AngrySwampManStudios Comparing government to the life sustaining sun is like comparing death to life. The government discoordinates the actions of individuals in a market society while the sun is essential for life. The government is not essential for social order but destroys social order.

  • @geoedwar84 That's not the comparison I'm making. The comparison I'm making is, you can't extinguish the sun. Well you can't extinguish government either, so the problem is far from solved. And government is necissary to keep our standard of living by the way.

  • .....

  • You think of the Middle East as the gravest threat to humanity? Do you know how offensive that is?

  • @precal22 i think they mean the terrorist but still that is pretty racist

  • @precal22 ehhh, to give him some credit those people over there are really fucked up. I dont get on the Islamofascism train much but Muslims in the M.E are jacked.

  • @precal22 he obviously meant the people in the middle east that are disturbing the peace there and are threatening lives, not everyone there is at fault for what is happening

  • @precal22

    The truth its not always nice and jolly :P It might be offensive but than again, its the truth.

  • @precal22 political correctness is always a really, really big threat to humanity. you dumb bitch.

  • @precal22 its not his fault.. its jus how th main stream media has forced th thought in us all!!

  • @precal22 Uhh ya we do. It seems to unstable over there.

  • @precal22

    I'm pretty sure he didn't mean it in an offensive manner. It's just hte mind set of people because of much of the terrorist activity going on there and so on. 50 years ago Americans would be saying that the Russians were the greatest threat to humanity, so mind set changes with time and events.

  • @Slecker95 That is completely different. Russia is a country, with it's leader basically threatening the US with nuclear weapons. The Middle East is a whole region, with not one of it's leaders provoking attacks.

    Saying Terrorism is a threat to humanity would be fine, saying a whole region of countries is a threat? That is down right offensive and unprovoked.

  • @baggedandblown Dude.. Don't let Call of duty teach you what countries think of another. Not one leader in the middle east is provoking attacks?! Are you just dumb or what?

  • @PolarBearPunch When the whole of the Middle East starts developing and moving nuclear arms to countries in order to gain a strategic advantage over it's enemy, get back to me.

  • @baggedandblown

    Well 9/11 only happened just 10 yers ago from terrorists from the middle easts, in 1997 there was the Egypt Luxor massacre, the 1979 Iran hostage takeover of the US embassy. So these events are quite fresh in peoples minds so I don't blame the guy if he would generalize the middle easts as "bad" becuase of just the recent events that have happend. And at the moment the middle east isn't exactly stable.

  • @precal22 They have nuclear weapons. How can that actually offend you? War is going on all over there and for some reason you think he said that just to offend you? good god... people these days..

  • @precal22 its offensive? well its fucking true...

  • ATTN ( TAKE PART ) IM CHALLENGING U TO HELP ME CHANGE THE WORLD ? PLEASE VIDEO TAPE U DOING ACTS OF HUMAN KINDNESS FOR PEOPLE U DONT KNOW ALL DAY LETS SEE HOW MANY ACTS U CAN DO IN ONE DAY HOW MUCH U CAN CHANGE PEOPLES LIVES WITH A RANDOM ACT OF HUMAN KINDNESS THEN CHALLENGE UR FRIENDS AN SUBSCRIBERS TO DO THE SAME PAY IT FORWARDS ,AND HELP ME CHANGE THE WORLD,JUST THINK MILLION OF PEOPLE WILL GET FEED/JOBS/ A MILLION ACTS OF KINDNESS WILL START FROM U THUMBS UP

  • there will never be pice as long as there are other humans

  • in case an alien invazion will begin is good to have nuclear warheads stockpiled!

  • @boghdan2000 if alien can travel to our planet and we cant. we already lost the war

  • Don't ban them, transform them... make them into neutron enhanced devices and fire them off... it's ok, no one will mind afterwards.

  • get real ya'll, get ride of guns??, are you crazy, the minute we take guns away, terrorist will over run this country fast, cause thugs aren't giving theirs up, thats like telling the drug cartel not to bring dugs in, you know they arent going to listen, so if you dont like guns go live with the hippies in another country.

  • when people have weapons they will eventually find an opportunity to use it and that is when things go wrong.

  • DONT FIGHT WITH WEAPON FIGHT WITHOUT

  • I don't really believe we can remove all the nuclear weapons, but knowing that some people care enough to get their heads out of their ass and actually try to change things makes me feel a little bit better about this screwed up world.

  • ya man your teeth suck ass

  • Brush Your Teeth.

  • If there were no Nuclear weapons we would have a lot more war. Nuclear weapons have probably stopped more wars from occurring then any peace activist has ever.

  • Good luck getting the Isralies to give up their's idiot dumbass.

  • The same arguments towards non-proliferation were made by members of the British government during Hitler's rise and resulted in WW2. There is far more evidence that more armaments by democratic nations leads to more peace. The members of this movement seem to just be having a visceral reaction towards weapons. Anyone who believes the world will never have a functional nuclear ever again is foolish. And such a scenario would leave us defenseless to a rogue state that develops one.

  • We let other country's make their own wepons now the Rusiians own us.

  • Nice :D

  • i'm sorry but i think it might actually be more useful for us to spread to other planets

    then try to disarm our nations

    i mean our technolgy is increasing really really fast

    if we build a mass converter all tabs on all objects are off

  • The Creator

    Loves you

  • i dont think you'll ever get to zero but good luck.

  • if all countries had nukes, any war would become cold although there is the possibility of corruption amongst officials leading to nukes being sold to terrorists etc. Because in theory mankind is so corrupt,we shouldn't have any. But its not that bad to have nukes either as it can be used in worst case scenarios. I mean if you think about it, this whole nuke matter dont really matter at this point as only a handful of countries have nukes and non have been detonated since Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

  • @ChatrboxCB syau you dont know what you are talking about

  • peace is cool and all.

  • If you want peace prepare for war. 20 000 nuclear bombs is a bit overdoing it though.

  • How do you enforce the Ban? I guess with some other kind of a powerful weapon? Hmmmm.

  • Weapons arent a problem, the human mind is.

    Greed, lust for power, are natural behaviours in humans.

    They want more nukes more power more money, just like you want more views more subscribers, more social status.

    If you dream of global peace, my advise is dont bother getting up from your warm bed and waking up from your sweet dream.

  • nukes are important..

  • If you are a american and you enjoy sleeping in your bed safely at night, thank god that the U.S. is the leader in having nukes....if they didnt have them, we would be attacked all the time.....

  • @mryorkielover I am tired of the spread of untruth and ignorance. That the one mistake most people make. They underestimate the ability of someone that is greater and then lean toward a limited thing such as science. There are things greater than science. There are things greater and beyond science. Why don't someone ask a real, and genuine so called seer of the future. That if they really exist, and ask them the question. Do they see a Nuclear attack in the future and if it is destined.

  • all firearms should be banned. only swords and kungfu are allowed...

  • @leonarldolaurence Just like the good old days

  • @leonarldolaurence

    Yes fuck pussy ass weapons, real man fight face to face :D with the ladies :D I love to watch a cat fight :D

  • @leonarldolaurence

    no friendly fire too.

  • Weird snarl at 1:31... O.o

  • Nuclear weapons are for pussies, but it is a great deterrent there's no denying it. Sadly it was used to end the war with Japan which tho it seemed horrific a land battle would have cost more lives. Also besides the Gulf wars no major large scale wars(between non third world countries) have been fought since its creation. Being American tho I think we dont need as many as we have its just ridiculous

  • even if nuclear weapons are banned, we all know that america will never abandon it

  • When I think of the gravest threats to humanity...

    I think of all the crap the media spreads ..

  • this guy needs to get that grill fixed

  • the nuke ended ww2 dumbass

  • Yo Jeff ...it's called a TOOTHBRUSH ...in case you were wondering what you are missing!

  • I simply say ...ONLY HONEST PEOPLE FOLLOW THE RULES!

  • I don't see any Muslims at your conference. HUH

  • @unatke have you been to the conference or googled the people who attended

  • YOU SYMBOLIZE HOPE

  • this guy looks like makarov from call of duty 

  • Your conference won't stop Iran from making nukes, or Pakistan. Keep living in your fake academic world. I bet you think the UN is useful, too!

  • @racevws Indeed. Never understimate the ignorance of some human beings understanding other human beings and the world itself.

  • @racevws people from the fake academic world made the nuke. something you can not comprehend, and if they think we should eliminate them, then their word means a whole lot more than the word of people like you.

  • @Mrinebriation Your comment shows you have no grasp of reality. You will never get a consensus from all the nuclear physicists to stop making bombs. You probably think gun control laws keep criminals from using guns too....

  • @racevws You will never get a consensus from all the nuclear physicists to agree that gravity exists thats besides the point the majority think we should lower the us nuclear power and i agree not to zero but definitely a lot less than now

  • @Mrinebriation I am sure you could get a consensus on gravity. I am curious as to how having fewer nukes makes things better. Is it because you are afraid of the US , China, Russia, India, Israel,Pakistan, GB, and France killing 7 billion in a war instead of only 4 billion? That is the only logical conclusion I can make from your argument. Having more nukes doesn't increase the chance of starting to use them, it only allows for the use of more once we have decided to destroy the earth.

  • @racevws first of all i think the world can destroy itself with it current military power without the use of nukes so thats not the issue i care about what i do care about is that nukes are unnecessary so why should we pay so much to build them.

  • @Mrinebriation So you started off by saying if academics could rid the world of nukes, lost that argument, now it's about the money? I get it, you want your utopian world where all the swords are plowshares, cars run on the good will of mankind, and farts smell like roses. That would be great, unfortunately, in reality, that will never happen. The best we can hope for is to limit nuclear proliferation to countries that have an economic interest in maintaining peace.

  • @racevws first of all if there is a consensus between scientist to limit anything their word should have a heavy weight in the decision making process. secondly there are non nuke bombs that can do three times as much damage as the bomb dropped on Hiroshima. thirdly why the fuck should we destroy for us for all living beings isn't enough to have enough force to rain fire on all of our enemies. why do we need to prepare for the contingency of poisoning the world forever.

  • @Mrinebriation A conventional weapon 3 times more powerful than the Hiroshima bomb? Thank you for proving that you haven't a clue about what you talk about. Hiroshima had a yield of about 16kton TNT, the largest non nuke explosion ever, wasn't even a weapon, but a Russian rocket failure, at most 7ktons. Thank you for helping me prove to everyone reading this exchange that you are delusional and should be ignored, as I will do now. Good bye.

  • @racevws lastly if we spend our money for war with extremely weaker countries that will never happen then we will end up selling our weapons to fund the government and our economy will weaken to the point where the only we can effect the world is through our weapons

  • It'll never go to 0, the best we can hope for at this point is to stop new states from acquiring them.

  • How can anyone dislike this video. To ever think nuclear weapons is the right answer shows much ignorance.

  • @RyanSmithDance

    If you know anything about science you'd know that nukes are antiquated weaponry. We keep nukes around for political and environmental reasons(to close a volcano or destroy an Asteroid). The nukes that are being dismantled are 60+ years old, and obsolete. This guy is nothing more than a political figure head that makes something out nothing.

    Comments like this make me lose faith in the general public. Must be rat breeding families.

  • Idealist much Jeff?? Imagine this. Every person in a room is holding a gun. Hey, everybody let's drop our guns and just fight with our fists. Anyone agree?

    On a more serious note, Russia is developing a new ICBM, the RS-24. China is increasing its nuclear stockpile steadily. Iran is sure to have nuclear weapons sooner or later. On the other hand, our ICBMs, especially the Minuteman IIIs, are getting obselete.

  • @ChibiSmasher Cowards fight with weapons, real man fight with their fists.

    

  • @richichardo You dont get the point do you. Please dont argue with irelevant points, just for the sake of argueing.

  • @richichardo so, you are a real man when you will lie on the floor dead, shot by a gun or stab by a knife? Yea, u are a real man, we all know it

  • @richichardo Then real men are stupid to fight with fist when they are being shot at.

  • @richichardo lol go ahead and form a country with a manly no-weapons army and see what happens

  • @richichardo real man don't fight. they talk

  • theres some heated stuff going on here.

  • Then wouldn't the most logical call to action be to demand disarmament of all countries whom have threatened destruction of a sovereign state be before the U.S.? Do NOT demand that we lead this charge but demand that we finalize when all other nations have complied.

  • What we need is bombs of mass destruction bombs that doesn't create radiation so humans can obliterate the hell out of each other and the next generation of humans can just rebuild instead of being wiped out from residual radiation of nukes.

  • very inspirational!

  • Comment removed

  • <<< Please listen to me cause I have no other option for employment than to re emerge the NON ISSUE known as nuclear weapon ownership - not development but ownership. reduce the population of American Nukes to ZERO so China, India, Pakistan, Russia, Israel, Iran North Korea and rogue nations buying up the loose ends of the Soviet collapse have more than THE HATED U.S. DICK!! And I say that because you live here and you have no solution to zero that includes anyone but the U.S. You pompous ass.

  • @Crucible0Patriot Of course less developed nations will have to be disarmed and watched carefully before huge nations start throwing out all of their fear inducing destroyers. It is certainly possible, and probably the right move statistically, because as technology advances, so does the risk of weapons falling into the wrong hands.

  • Nuclear weapons can have peaceful applications.

    I think we should always have a small contigency force of nukes operated by NASA in case of an asteroid impact. I'm not talking about blowing up the asteroid, but rather using the blast of the nuke to redirect its course.

  • give pete a chance

  • Id rather be on the side that has them in the case that they are needed than the side that does not have them when they are needed...

  • @FalkataSports the us has enough force destroy the world even without nuclear weapons so why do you need to destroy and poison the world

  • @Mrinebriation With current military cuts that statement is currently inaccurate! We are very low on the military scale in the world! While China is increasing military spending by 10% we are cutting it by billions! Dont be naive and think if we lay down are arms other people will to it just wont happen!

  • @FalkataSports if the us cuts its military spending by 50% it would still out spend china who is not retarded enough to spend that much on their military and commit the same mistake of the soviet union.

    also current we have enough force to destroy the world 20 times. so would having enough force to destroy the world 5 or 4 times be that big of a difference we still can destroy the world and every thing in it

  • @Mrinebriation Your facts are off we are in no way capable of destroying the entire world? Also its been a main story on the news that China is increasing its spending to a level that should make us worry! What you see as making the world a better place I see as lowering our impact in the world no matter how much military power we have we are a symbol and always have been of freedom, democracy and hope and with military spending cut countries like Iran and China will be emboldened!

  • @FalkataSports we are capable of killing every human on a land mass 20 times thats a fact. and iran in no way can ever compete with the military force of the us. and china is not invading the us and if they did we have more allies and they depend on the us economically so they would be screwed and we would be scrached. so we should cut spending

  • @Mrinebriation Cut spending in other areas if thats all your worried about there are a million other places to cut it that are bigger wastes? Cut funding that we send to foreign countries! Start drilling oil again use our natural resources so we dont have to rely on foreign oil? There are so many other places to cut and the military should be the last! Thats my opinion im not saying it has to be yours but the men and women out there are protecting the freedoms we do have left...

  • @FalkataSports i understand what you are saying, but the military can still do its job without giving huge amounts of money to military contractors to build weapons and engines that we never use. its unfair to the tax payer and its absolutely unnecessary

  • @FalkataSports and feel as if they can step on the freedoms of smaller countries!

  • Yea first if you are from US get rid of the bombs in US. What US does is invade Iraq and tell that there are WMD...After this how can you make everyone believe that they are dangerous if you hold it yourself. Personally I, if I were the leader of any country and US or EU asked me to get rid of the weapons I would not agree.

  • This is the same stupid argument that is at the center of gun control. Assuming that if we the peaceful good nations gets rid of our nukes will encourage other nations to follow suit is naive and dangerous. The weaker we make ourselves emboldens nations that want to see our downfall. The only way they will get rid of their nukes will be to detonate them over our great nation. What about all of the innocent Americans? You just can't "get rid" of the technology.

  • keep moving 20,000 nukes are 20,000 too many....

  • Hey Jeff how will you feel when someone govt or terrorists nuke us ,your global warming wont matter but vengence will .... we shouldnt have even gone to tora bora for binladen we should have just nuked it with the big one they disassembled yesterday and then others would have thought twice about their jihad and so on. will u be passive and not own a gun when a man rapes your wife u will wish u had the chance to make the diff to stop it as he hold the gun to her head and makes u watch.

  • @TheDuckseason Are you not listening? We're talking having no nuclear weapons at all. Getting rid of the technology. Nuke Afghanistan to hunt down a minor number of terrorists when they fled to Paksitan for cover long ago? What about all the innocent people living there?

    We cannot continue this warfare as it is the most disintegrating thing in our society. We have to work for no ultimate weapons, but weapons that are precise and strike the enemy in his heart.

  • Now show that video without emotional music.

  • Honestly, I like to be opptimistic, but we're not gonna get rid of all our nukes. They are, for the US at least, too much a symbol of power. And sometimes, they do work as a deterrent. Most of the time they don't, but sometimes they actually do. Frankly, I think we are going to have to abandon oil and embrace something else.

  • Humans are programmed to seek out the best technology possible, it's how our genetics are. As long as someone knows how to make a nuke, they will never be gone.

  • dont worry guys im just about to Save the World.

    Stay put.

  • imagine if future technology allows individuals to create thermonuclear weaponry.

  • flawed Russia are hiding some we are hiding some russia has sold a a lot to a lot of country's "off the record" so there is more the 20,000 out there thats just 20,000 we know about so far

  • was this a comedy sketch?

  • Interesting video

  • so the muslim extremist can bomb u.s.a and israel

  • if we dont the world is fucked if we do America is going to loose their balls and then the world is fucked

  • hippy ass bitches

  • Nuclear power plants are just nuclear bomb factories. We now face the danger of nuclear plants being just as dangerous as weapons. Fukushima released radiation equal to 1600 Hiroshima bombs. Shut it all down or face extinction. Watch the Japanese population face the worst nuclear holocaust since the bombs dropped as they raise safe radiation levels to 4-5 times Chernobyl standards. Good luck, and good night.

  • YOU SYMBOLIZE HOPE

  • Not happening, but keep wasting your time trying to achieve this goal

  • I can't believe so many of you disliked this video because "nukes are cool"

    WTF? you all have played CoD too much. Ask someone from Hiroshima how fucking cool nukes are.

    Nukes has the potential