Added: 4 years ago
From: Eriksz
Views: 299,606
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (3,317)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • This is a great example of how pathetic the Apollo hoax "evidence" is. Look at how much the flag is moving - if that was due to wind there must have been a howling gale blowing! And they want people to believe that those perpetrating this hugely complicated hoax were too thick to see anything wrong in these shots?

  • ALL THIS VIDEO PROVES IS THERE IS WIND IN SPACE! I WONDER IF I COULD DRY MY PANTS UP THERE!

  • @sonofZekie LOL

  • I take it almost noone watched the episode of mythbusters where this myth was proven wrong. They found that in an airless environment, that the flag flapped because there was nothing preventing the flag from slowing quickly exept for gravity, also meaning there was no air resistance

  • You jump to conclusion too fast. do some more research.

  • noob the flag is waving do to motion because they are planting. the flag never once waved or moved when it was untouched. You have no common sense.

  • show me a flag anywhere in the world that waves like that in the wind... smart one

  • NASA

    NAZI AMERICAN SPACE AGENCY

    KEEP THE FLAG STILL MORONS

  • Why on earth would they put a WIND MACHINE in a studio where they are filming a fake MOON landing? WHY?

  • @s23b The Apollo Disney moon landings were filmed on earth in area 51

    nevada desert. Its hot there and so air conditiong is essential

    Any other questions?

  • @NasaCriminals So they're evil masterminds and dumb as shit at the same time?

    How hard must you be trying to believe this bullshit?

  • @NasaCriminals LOL sit down moron. We landed on the moon. The flag was waving because the astronauts were trying to fix it into the hole. When they let go of it, it hung still on its rod. Some people say "no fire blast! fake fake!" Yeah no oxegen on the moon. Others say "the astronauts would have floated right off" This once i laugh about; all masses in space have gravitiy. LOL I could talk about this all day but i really do have a life.

  • What I want to know is why NASA spent billions and billions, hired over 10'000 engineers to construct a stunt?

    Why wouldn't they just make their life easier, and actually send the people to the moon.

    It reminds me of 9/11'truthers' - if it was explosives and not the planes, why go to all the trouble of highjacking aeroplanes, when you could just tell the public the terrorists sneaked in at night (easy to fake CCTV cameras) and laid explosives.

    Conspiracy theory people are fucking morons.

  • @TheSelfishAltruist Sneaked in at night?? I think your the moron. People ain't going to believe terrorists sneaking into the WTC and planting bombs all inside it. Im sure there's alot of security in that building. And the moon? well why do you think they faked it? because we humans can't land on the moon, it's some what impossible, don't you think there every other country would of been there by now? America is always over the top, so what better way to scare the pupulation.

  • @TheSelfishAltruist yet another Dumb Troll on youtube

    US Criminal government stole $70BILLION from the US taxpayers

    to Fake the apollo missions from 1968-1972, sure thats worth it

    Lol you sick trolls always defend the 911 Inside Job

    How did buidling 7 fall down by itself idiot?

    How did the twin towers free fall?

    Planned Demolition

  • @NasaCriminals Whats interesting about people like you is you don't tend to believe one conspiracy, you believe them all.

    Why do you think that is? What makes you so paranoid, and also what makes you reject the status quo so much?

  • I think everyone is missing the point. The flag was made with wire mesh to stick out, and appear to move.

  • @Eriksz Why does the flag only move when the astronauts are touching it in this video? watch?v=MunPi3ifqpw&feature=re­lated

  • ass holes cant even lie right.

  • Dumbass.

  • it was on QI they said that because there was barely any gravity or wind resistance or something when they got it unravveled it didnt stop waving for ages

  • @jamstamanify Yes, if you have access to a vacuum chamber, you see stuff keep moving for a long time. It isn't rocket science. The main thing that slows down a sheet of material is wind resistance.

  • Conspiracy theorists......please look at the "Mythbusters" videos on Youtube.

    Everything will be explained. Even the moving flag.

  • The flag can and will move with no air. All this means is that air or wind can't move the flag; it doesn't mean the flag can't move at all. Once it starts moving, it'll actually move a lot more up there than down here on earth because since there's no air, there's no air resistance. It will move a lot longer without air resistance. Gravity will have to bring it to a hault.

  • i just love gringos and they i know all attitude WE NEVER LANDED ON THE MOON

  • @piggod1234 The irony in your remark has me laughing out loud, Mr "I know all attitude"!!

  • KEEP THE FLAG STILL NASA MORONS

    DISNEY MOON LANDINGS

    FILMED ON EARTH

  • Ever heard of inertia, people?

  • @JeremeK Looks like most haven't. This is why are education system is failing.

  • @JeremeK SHHH!!!  Don't confuse the CT's with real SCIENCE! They don't like that!!! Play nice! :(

  • @nopethegeek LoL NASA FAKE SCIENCE

  • @MrCommunitytv blocked

  • @Eriksz lol

  • @Eriksz block me too because you are clearly ..... a fucking nimrod.

    sorry?

  • @coloaninnow sure

  • @Eriksz your a fag you little baby back bitch 

  • @xPARTTIMENINJA27x lol blocked

  • @coloaninnow The moon is in fact, a vacuum, but being a vacuum means you have no atmosphere, so there for no wind.

  • @TheRealBanjo2

    that's what I have been trying to teach the kids lol , they never seem to get it

  • @MikeMalaysia Lol

  • @Eriksz im agreeing with everyone else right now the lols on u

  • @MrCommunitytv the moon is 1/6 gravity , thats not a vacuum

    Learn how to spell you fucking monkey

  • @NasaCriminals still a vacuum. But when the flag is set in motion (by touching) it's gonna keep moving for a while.

  • @MrCommunitytv The reason why I think it was staged is because they wanted to waste money in space instead of putting money in education and giving to the poor.

  • @MrCommunitytv you realise that you just made urself look like a total idiot and kid?

  • the flag had wires built in to make it "move in the wind" for photo ops

  • Moon landing is fake why havent they gone again now with better technology and proove it????

  • @knightcrawler003. ummm.. because NASA has lots of other things to do. Such as the ISS, exploration of other planets, orbiting telescopes, and monitoring geological things like arctic ice and sea levels. Have some patience, I believe another manned lunar mission is being planned, and also the Chinese are intent on having their own mission in the near future.

  • @knightcrawler003 And WHAT exactly would constitute "proof" to you? The answer of course is NOTHING. Nothing short of going there yourselves will satisfy you CTs - you'll just move the goal posts and assume new footage has been hoaxed as well.

  • That particular footage doesn't cut it as fake Moon landing fodder. Because the flag movements are ALWAYS being controlled 'manually' by either or both of the lunar astronauts.

  • Why if the moon landing was faked can I go to the university observatory and see several of the landing sites, which I've done. Besides what you see here isn't wind, it's newton's second law in action, for every action there is a equal and opposite reaction. Why is it always people without an education who believe this stuff?

  • @FLJuJitsu. All the observatories are in on the hoax. In fact, the Soviets discovered the hoax in 1970 and were given $1 trillion to keep quiet. They used this money to fund research into the caterpillar propulsion unit which explains how Red October was able to slip past the USS Dallas. Meanwhile, NASA is planning to fake a manned mission to Mars, and fake a first contact with an alien species who'll tell the people of earth how awesome their leaders are.

  • @baobubs Haha. Very good :o)

    You do realise that some CTs will actually believe this?

  • @baobubs Did you dream this, or did it come to you through your crystal ball?

  • @FLJuJitsu You answered your own question - its always people without an education that believe this stuff, because they don't have an education! Though you cant accuse them of not having an IMAGINATION! ;)

  • there is more proof that people landed on the moon, then there is that NY is located in the USA

  • You're right! If you move something on the Moon...it should not move.  Wait a second...

  • u all are stupid there is a rod in the top of the flag and when he moves to put the flag in the flag will move to you all are dumb as hell.

  • it's called interia dumb fucks

  • This is Hoillywood fiction a JOKE The flag is being blown by a wind machine

  • @InfinityNebula Oh yeah, totally forgot that NASA put a wind machine in the "studio" on purpose, to make the flag wave. Seriously dude, do you even read what you type?

    What is next from you? The moon doesn't exist?

  • @iXelsior Another nut sucking NASA  balls under mind control fuckin ZIONIST

  • @InfinityNebula yawn...Zzzzz.....

  • @iXelsior Well of course the moon exists, but it is made of cheese.

  • @cameraguy38 American cheese.

  • Comment removed

  • @InfinityNebula why isn't the dust blowing up then?

  • that is not a natural movement of a flag in a vaccum regardless of exerted force. it would be continuous yet this flag is twithcing all over the place and btw it hasnt been sped up it is mearly the refresh rate of older technologies that were in use at the time

  • That is fake because there is no air on the moon for wind to blow the flag.

  • @iTouch1452 NASA didn't even think there'd be no wind on the moon ? Silly NASA. They may have fooled Russia but they couldn't fool you, eh ?

  • @iTouch1452 look up INERTIA and get back to us...

  • Comment removed

  • @InfinityNebula So it is getting pretty obvious that you are a troll. That or you really are brain damaged. I am waiting for you right here, so when you are done with name calling and jacking off, show me some proof.

  • @iXelsior insults when you have no rebuttal cocksucker its obvious you're a paid troll for the fraud organization scumbag trolling for dicks

  • @InfinityNebula Your needle is still stuck. I am waiting right here for your irrefutable proof.

  • Trust and believe people the lies coming from people on this page defending these fake landings have an agenda

  • "there was no moon landing, 911 was america's own government, america is evil and fascist." i dunno about anyone else, but if i wasted my time believing that nonsense i might as well blow my pessimistic brains away with a shotgun.

    Moon landing = awesome, beautiful, amazing,, 911 = horrible, cowardly, but brought americans together, and fuck i would rather live in america (or canada my country) than pakistan... lets get real

  • Go watch mythbuster's moon landing special...

  • The moon has a thin atmosphere, sorry. I don't see why it's so hard to believe that we went to the moon.. It doesn't take phenomenal technology, or a 1,000,000 year species to travel that far into the black lol.

  • @SorrellsAV There's no atmosphere on the moon dude.

  • @SorrellsAV Actually, it would be 100x harder to fake it. Also, if they did fake it, why do it 9 times? Why even wait for Apollo 11, when they could have faked an Apollo 10 landing? Heck why even bother with all those lunar modules? If it was a Kubrick project, then why bother building a Mercury, Gemini and an Apollo CSM and LM? 400,000 people worked in the industry, and not a single one blew the whistle?

    Reality check for moronic conspiracy theorists.

  • @iXelsior I know, it's preposterous. These people need to look at the real conspiracy with their names on it, not spout fake moon bullshit because of a few YT videos. The moon isn't even a huge achievement in my opinion, but traveling to other solar systems would be. People are drones, therefore they behave like drones.. They're so caught up with groups they never examine the evidence. They think you either have to believe in shit, or not believe, what about middle ground I say..?

  • @SorrellsAV I think it was a big accomplishment given the technology, and given all the near misses they had, but I agree with you that the interstellar manned spaceflight will be spectacular, and the first man to walk on Mars will be bigger than Armstrong's first step, and this with all due respect to Armstrong, a true American icon.

  • @iXelsior touche' Well said!

  • Comment removed

  • Nice Hollywood studio set LoL

  • @InfinityNebula studio set? how come theres wind inside the studio?

  • If you think that is the behaviour of a flag "blowing in the wind" then you are a bigger muppet than Kermit the Frog. It's no accident that film has also been speeded up slightly.

  • @cameraguy38 It's not been sped up.

  • @Eriksz Regardless of the films speed, the behaviour is nothing like any flag I've seen blowing in a breeze. It looks to me exactly like the equal and opposite reaction of the flagpole itself being twisted. Exactly the type of reaction I'd expect to see in a low gravity vacuum with no air pressure to limit the flag's movement as the pole is being twisted. Just look at a flag in a breeze, and then look at this. Watch carefully now; nothing..like...each..other.

  • @cameraguy38 On the opposite approach the original could have been slowed down....

  • @cameraguy38 What?

  • dude mythbusters said they WENT to the moon by testing if they went.

  • How do you know dude!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • For all you geniuses who were smart enough to figure out that there is no wind on the surface of the moon, guess what? There is no wind inside a Hollywood sound stage either.

    Whaddaya think? Somebody left a window open?

  • @MrLakiel no...a lot of ppl think it was filmed in area 51 also

  • its the inertia of the energy being put into the flag near the bottom. you critics always attack every little corner huh?

  • The flag has a bar across the top to keep it straight and it's weighted at the bottom to hold it down. That’s why it moves that way.

  • @tmjacks1 There's no weight at the bottom dude.

  • @Eriksz But there still is that little gravity in the moon you know. Didn't you think of the possibility that the gravity pulls that flag's bottom towards the moon?

  • @Eriksz actually, yes there is. i dont believe the moon landings either, but you people who keep focusing on things like the flag blowing are really making it hard on the rest of us, with REAL evidence. the flag is a red herring

  • @guineapiggyman what is your real evidence, just wondering

  • @Eriksz Did any of you morons ever bother watching the videos where the flag does not move even a centimeter when the astronauts walk by it? Also, did you also notice that that flag only moves when it is touched?

  • @iXelsior One video the flag moves when someone goes near it, without touching it. Moron.

  • Comment removed

  • @Eriksz It's there...sewn into the flags bottom stripe.

  • @darrlon I don't think that's true Darrlon.

  • For people who stil want to believe we went to the moon: watch carefully and see how the loose corner flaps first.

    (Mythbusters busted nothing)

  • @losability You HONESTLY believe that if they were faking the moon landing, they'd be stupid enough to leave in a flag that was blowing in the wind? Really? Really?? You know the Russians monitored this ENTIRE mission right? The enemies of the space race don't even say that we never went to the moon.

    omfg you guys are nuts.

  • @SpazzK yes (4 times)

    As i said: watch carefully, for example 0:45 and later and learn to trust your own eyes and brain

  • Comment removed

  • just by looking at this dudes comment you can tell that he's Russian. U Mad Russia?

  • @FlikkyFilms This is isn't the 1950's or 60's or even 70's. The cold war is over so your comment about Russia is lame.

  • People...LOOK at what is happening here...the flag is not WAVING, the guy holding the flag pole is TWISTING it, in an effort to grind the bottom tip of the pole into the lunar surface.

  • Moon landing hoax theories exist purely to make the uneducated feel intelligent. It's also a handy way of getting anti establishment college girls into bed. "Yeah babe, fuck the system and those sheep who follow it. Hey you wanna fuck in my Dads car?"

  • So.. there was wind inside the "studio"... ridiculous.. go back to school and study some phisics and vacuum facts.

  • @DreadfullMind "physics". ;)

  • @TheREALforeverone thanks.. english is not my mother tongue

  • Also we have to remember the reflectors left on the moon, the Astronauts left behind mirrors/reflectors, which scientists to this day use to determine the length from Earth to the Moon. Scientists from all over the world use them all the time, all year. And it is certain they where planted there, precisely.

    Even countries like Russia, China and Iran use these for there own research. It would be a massive PR stunt for these countries to prove the USA did not land on the moon, so why don't they?

  • This may help you understand a little better watch?v=9EMr8H1vmOo

  • Simple:

    1) There is very little gravity on the moon therefor there is no perceivable downward pull of gravity. Also there's a stick across the top.

    2) There is no air on the moon so an movement like the obvious twist of the flag pole into the ground will continue to make the flag flap as there is no friction from the air to stop it. It's basic and answered by Newtons first law of motion: The velocity of a body remains constant unless the body is acted upon by an external force.

  • @jinkies82 . I'm with you on this one too. The flapping flag is the most obvious sign that those men are actually on the moon, for real. The flag would still be flapping to this day if not for the inherent friction created by the material fibres that make up the flag itself.

  • It is hard to believe the people around the world can be so dumb.

    IT'S CALLED INERTIA!

    It's that simple, people.

  • This is closer to being proof that it was shot on the moon if you knew about physics.

  • he was waving it?

  • The lack of atmosphere means a lack of friction so when the astronauts move the flag, it continues to move much longer that if it were in an atmosphere. Learn shit, it will help you to be less gullible.

  • sooooooo , do you think that in low gravity , or a vacuum a piece of fabric becomes a solid sheet of metal or something!? fucking idiots!? hes touching the flag and twisting it into the ground of course its gonna move

  • @TheSouthern1cross. I'm with you on this. --- too many dumb people are allowed to breed and choke up planet earth. Hence, we must try to find living room elsewhere. The moon maybe. So the U.S went out there to have a look, and they got there for real.

  • @jimmytheblaze hahaha yes absolutely , but the moons still to close , id say mars is probably the best shot for the future of humanity

  • It was during the Cold War after all. The Russians were absolutely capable of detecting the Apollo missions in detail. A large missile shaped metallic object above their heads that came from the USA would surely get their attention. LOL. They would have known that it just orbited then came down a few days later. Not to mention somehow with hundreds of pounds of Moon rock and Lunar soil. How does Lunar soil get here without burning up in the atmosphere? Lunar rocks containing no Fusion crust?done

  • even today a private 16in telescope can find the landing sites....

  • Lol, you can send a hoaxer to the Moon and they will still say it is a fake. Conspiracy theorists have a mental impairment.

  • KEEP THE FLAG STILL NASA MORONS

    How can we believe in the Disney Moonlandings if you dont keep the flag still

  • Mythbusters shot this down in flames.

    try again.

  • @BadBunnyRides LOL Mythbuster Morons

    You are retarded TROLL

    Explain to us what the mythbuster jew queers said, i dare you retard :)

  • KEEP THE FLAG STILL NASA CLOWNS

  • it's not blowing in the wind. the top of the flag is stuck to a hard pole or stick of some sort that is stuck to the main flagpole, so that is stays up, and the flag is wiggling around because they're turning the flagpole.

  • @TheFemaleIcelander thank you, someone else possesses a functioning brain.

  • @ju66al070 haha, i don't understand how people can't see this.

  • And to the guys that deny the landings due to no stars in the photography, how about you read up on cameras a little bit, eh. All about exposure time. Just as Hubble needs days at times just to view distant objects. And view the Apollo Archives you WILL find photos of a few of the more brighter stars of the night sky.

  • @Axelparisian THE RETARDED APOLLO HOAXER

    USSR took pictures of stars from space idiot

    Shuttle Discovery did as well

    Apollo 16 even edited in stars

  • If you guys use the videos as such factual evidence that we didn't go there how do explain the enormous thing in the distance called Earth in many of the Apollo videos? The Feather/Rock experiment which was visual proof that they were in a vacuum not to mention the rate they descended impossible with Earth Gravity. Nasa doesn't even own a vacuum chamber that large to house that one. And that flag in the wind BS, if in an atmosphere why does the flag not move as they breeze past it. Sad.

  • @Axelparisian this is how you explain it Bullshitter

    Banned in America: Proof of Fake Moonlanding

    /watch?v=y1tqZyZVoDM&lc=sTLnvC­jErRkt2oaOM_f9yCYzPqWLhZYuxKGY­fOKZhlw&feature=inbox

  • @NasaCriminals You have a mind of your own please use it for the sake of mankind. Facts are there for you to learn for yourself don't be so gullible. Of the 400,000+ Apollo personnel, private contractors you say not one will expose the truth and maybe get rich sign a few book deals and get some tv appearances? The USSR which was in direct competition would be the first to deny their claims of the moon given their various observational systems just as the US exposed their early efforts for space

  • @Axelparisian Guss Grissom was going to expose the truth about the Fake Apollo Programme and Nasa murdered him on apollo 1.

    USSR did not have the space technology to track the Fake apollo moon landings

    and the USSR was not in line with the fake apollo 11 position on the moon

    You are a brainwashed monkey TROLL

  • For all of you critical of this video, I am sorry if WE do not believe a known bunch of compulsive liars, that USA landed on the moon.

    I don't know how, after the decades of complete BULLSHIT from USA, especially over the last decade, you can believe anything they say?!

    Some solid evidence of the moon landing would be nice.

  • @Eriksz

    LISTEN. When you shake a flag, or pull it out, it's obviously going to flutter, despite how low the gravity may be. Because there is less gravity, the energy is maintained for longer, dumbass.

  • @Eriksz This is the best you can do? INERTIA. IN-ERR-SHA. Explains how the fucking flag is flapping. It is possible to bounce a laser of a mirror placed on the Moon, how much more proof do you want?

  • @Eriksz Here you HAVE evidences. Look at your argument: "'cause USA says bullshit, they do not reach the moon ever". I'm sorry my friend... Blowing in the WIND USA's FLAG? This demonstrate that you have NO IDEA of the Newton's LAW: Principle of Inertia. Go study.

  • @WTFtheyhide You like it or not, USA GET OVER THE MOON on July 20th, 1969.

  • @Eriksz /watch?v=9EMr8H1vmOo&feature=r­elated There is some solid evidence. Not enough? How about this? /watch?v=0dTATMEJSuQ Or this? /watch?v=mefEKqzq8cgget Get over this 40 year old THEORY that man did not land on the moon and accept it as the technical achievement that it is.

  • @Eriksz 842 lb of Moon Rocks.

    I'm a geologist. I collaborated with scientists who developed instruments at the University of Manchester used to date Apollo Moon rocks. They dated my rock samples.

    I have personally examined Apollo moon rock, they contain particles of solar wind & radioactive isotopes generated by cosmic rays. They show no life, weathering or alteration. They are extraordinary "fresh", despite being to 3.2 to 4.5 billion years old. They not Lunar Meteorites.

  • @Diamonddavej Do you think there is NO WAY, these could have been fabricated? Thanks for the input BTW..

  • @Eriksz All Apollo rocks are >2 billion years old, they were naturally made long ago on the moon, not the 1960s. If you try to fake a rock, melt a rock and let cool, you measure the time the rock was last melted. It's utterly impossible to manufacture an old rock.

    Scientists use a variety of techniques to date rocks, all depend on the decay of natural radioactive elements. I've used Ar-Ar dating, a method developed for lunar samples - it's reliable, accurate and self-checks for error.

  • Comment removed

  • @Eriksz Here's a comparison between lunar meteorites and Apollo samples 15418 & 67215.

    Hudgins et al., 2011. Mineralogy, geochemistry, and 40Ar–39Ar geochronology of lunar granulitic breccia Northwest Africa 3163 and paired stones: Comparisons with Apollo samples. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 75(10), 2865-2881.

    Sample Description - 67215 FRAGMENTAL (MONOMICT GRANOBLASTIC?) BRECCIA 276 g (Apollo samples have catalogue numbers, Pdf describes each).

    All Pdfs are online

  • @Diamonddavej Thanks for the info, I'll try to review it.

  • @Eriksz problem with idiot conspiracy theorists like is just that: you are all idiots. Go to the Apollo archives website, look at the photos and tell me how was it possible to create those images without a software like Photoshop in the sixties, when the most advanced computer was probably the AGC? Or, show me a single video of the flag waving because of wind when an astronaut hops by. Get out of your mom's basement and get a life. 

  • @Eriksz even if we did give you solid evidence I'm sure you'd find a way to argue it and continue to q_q about how we didnt land on the moon so what's the point