This is what I'm uncaging about, the Duchampatorium. I'm proud of being included as a Pataphysic Video Messiah by the digparty website in their awesome pataphisicians celebrities wizards almatic party, between Marcel Duchamp, Alfred Jarry, Boris Vian, Jean Dubuffet, all of'em... Blessed.
Fantastical how the Danish label Echochords LPs resemble the first of the discs, and how the DIAL label's "The Lost Tracks pt. 1" resemble the fish on the disc at 1:47!
4000 $ gratis!! habt ihr ne Ahnung gehabt, was ein coupon code ist? Ich auch nicht aber jetzt weiß ich es und es ist ein Wahnsinn, dass ich bei Lucky Red Casino exklusiv mit dem Coupon Code: TOPBONUS doppelte Mittel für mein Casinoerlebnis bekommen habe, ohne viel dafür zu tun! Das ist wirklich leicht verdientes Kies und Spaß an Zocken im Casino hab ich dabei auch noch!
@pataphysician66 Yes, I find it interesting when people describe 'art' as advanced when now, the Hollywood entertainment machine since 'Bush' has been reduced to scavenging it's influences between comic books and children's stories......Can anyone prove me wrong....
I don't think that it's meant for understanding. Part of modern art is to reflect society and a lot of artists think that we can't understand life or society as it is.
I like the references to Marcel Duchamp's famous work, "Nude descending a staircase." The woman on that painting was broke up into lines to focus on the movement, and it seems like the music reflects that same idea.
I have to respectfully disagree. I too love Raymond Scott, however, assuming you're referring to his electronic music, he consciously designed it for commercials in the age of the Jetsons. This music by Cage and film by Duchamp was designed to express the thematic connection between musical sounds and natural geometric forms and physical movement. I miss the counterculture with its openness that this (and Raymond Scott) were emblematic of.
you have to think of the context - experimental 60's influenced by hallucinagens, minimalism, op art and a search for the new through mistake and experiment. the meaning - if asking for one - is that the meaning is intrinsic to the medium. not meant to be philo or psychological - it is what it is.... but that's quite a difficult thing to achieve.
The round disc is like one my father had showing wave motion (for people who are - say - learning physics) - it can mean dreams but I think they wanted to show the sound -music -image-space-motion interconnection - and I think if you just look at it and listen it can mean whatever you want it to.
actually... I'm not quite understand what does this film means... can someone pls explain to me ? I did love to know more about it.. especially those rounds , what are they for ? does it mean dreams ?
Im not sure of the name, but I can tell you that it was written for Prepared Piano, meaning that John Cage presumably stuck a bunch of random things (paper clips, chewing gum, footie pajamas, shampoo bottles, dead babies, etc.) in a piano and used that as a way of composing: He removed a lot of his 'intention' from the music by not knowing how things would sound. He also did this by using chance operations. Pretty cool stuff though, if you like it, you should check out some of his other stuff.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
alright genius' ready to be mind blown, this isnt the original. so you can all stop arguing about duchamp, the original was silent, black and white and went for 7 minutes, they are the same disks bearing spirals yeah, but this isnt duchamps original work
Original??? What is it? Original is not a qord for Marcel Duchamp. This is a Richter's film with approvation of Duchamp and John Cage, of course. A bunch of bad guys!!
@nanathan you're wrong, the "original" you're referring to is anemic cinema made by Duchamp in 1926.
This is a sequence of "dreams that money can buy" by Richter, which uses Duchamp's 'rotoreliefs', made in 1935. Those rotoreliefs stuff are similar in style with the 'anemic cinema' film, but in fact they're a different thing.
I like this video as the music and video goes very well together. But as for the ''excellent metaphors'' I don't believe there are any. Anyone who says otherwise should really explain what those metaphors are or where the ''deepness'' in it lies. Otherwise it's likely s/he is just trying to gain status from the elitist person-fixated social construct known as art by seeming ''deep'' without really having a clue, which is really fucking annoying.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
you dont need intellect to understand this nonesense, the word intellect comes from europe my friend, i hope your old enough to admit that, this is just a little bug for people to debate on, not to buy tickets and listen to this bullshit.
Disingenuous, and condescending. It takes more than put-downs to convince someone of your point. But I have to question if you are even interested in changing anyone's mind so much as expressing your disgust. Well, enjoy your freedom of expression as Cage and Duchamp have.
albul, go back to reading NOTW, watch jane goody on telly,you're out of your depth talking about Duchamp, don't exhaust your intellect, remember you don't have one my friend as it comes from europe.
Some people like spam, but some people do not like spam. It is interesting to note the differences in attitude. Are you a spam enthusiast? Consider your reactions to spam, and try to evaluate where you stand in the great spam debate.
Well, those were certainly the wisest words I have ever heard on the subject of spam. That really has given me something to think about. Such profundity, such insight ...
this is a, Artistic Movement emerged in Europe and North America. Appeared in Zurich, Switzerland between 1916 and 1922 with Tristan Tzara as its founder. It was a violent past opposition to the First World War.
Dada comes as a total ideology as a way of life and as an absolute rejection of any tradition or previous scheme
He did a good film with Rahsaan Roland Kirk called "Sound". It is a really good explanation of why the two very different artists used extra-musical sound, which he's not really doing here. I don't know enough about Cage to do apologetics for him, but Kirk is one of the great Jazz-men.
No...he was a brilliant man and a great innovator. The music here is intended to be as abstract or random as Duchamp's images. Look up John Cage on wikipedia.I think you'll find it interesting; he made a lot of important contributions to modern music.
I don't consider him to be very interesting, thought provoking. His work is rather 1-dimensional. It doesn't reach into the higher realms of art- it's tapestry music and I believe shallow. That's my opinion- nothing revolutionary about Cage. Now Bartok is a whole different thing all together. Whey you place Bartok next to Cage one should see what I mean- see the many layers of Bartok.
Where do you stand in the great bullshit debate? What are your views about bullshit? Is it a significant social force? Is it an important element of modern society? Has bullshit developed in recent years? Is the quality of bullshit as high as in the 1990s? Or do you not have views? Do you need advice from a bullshit guidance expert?
Should bullshit become a way of life? Should the future of bullshit be regulated by government legislation, or by qualified independent consultants?
More Cage and Richter than Duchamp in this...
Poemsapennyeach 2 months ago
This is what I'm uncaging about, the Duchampatorium. I'm proud of being included as a Pataphysic Video Messiah by the digparty website in their awesome pataphisicians celebrities wizards almatic party, between Marcel Duchamp, Alfred Jarry, Boris Vian, Jean Dubuffet, all of'em... Blessed.
DONOFRIONIST 3 months ago
Anybody else trying to write an essay on Duchamp?
Nindojo 3 months ago
"DaDa is beautiful like the night, who cradles the young day in her arms."
(Hans Arp)
vondelpark1973 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
He's one of my favorite artist check out my art blog: readymade-fountain (dot) blogspot (dot) com/
slthlrdz 6 months ago
Fantastical how the Danish label Echochords LPs resemble the first of the discs, and how the DIAL label's "The Lost Tracks pt. 1" resemble the fish on the disc at 1:47!
esbengroendal 7 months ago
yo, some of those discs looked like mushrooms... very Cagean!
polythedralgarden 8 months ago
stfu retards
ChemoSession1 8 months ago
dada
dadaist2011 8 months ago
I love it!! Gets us outside of our Mozart box. Cage, et al are geniuses!
windstorm1000 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Did you guys see John Lennon in there? Uncanny.
jakountz1 1 year ago
Did you guys see John Lennon in there? Uncanny.
jakountz1 1 year ago
i think thats the first time ive seen boobs on youtube in my life,
FTGKR3WGRAFF 1 year ago
See Snake Oil for the conceptual art that attacks conceptual art and modern art abuses, and suggests a new post modern art of back to basics.
TomHendricksMusea 1 year ago
this is great
stonem001 1 year ago
nice one! thanks for posting this.
victorsaint2 1 year ago
crazy round things
antumamo 1 year ago
Dada. Nice.
Diametrac 1 year ago
very exotic music!
adric137 1 year ago
this is from richter's "Dreams That Money Can Buy"..great movie...
trufiend138 1 year ago
superbe! ......so avant-garde...non?
testaroja 1 year ago
what?
OdeToNecrophilia 1 year ago
vraiment!
Mazurka1001 1 year ago
What is the music piece? Someone tell me the name!
OdeToNecrophilia 2 years ago
reunion?
elveto88 2 years ago
And who's the creator?
OdeToNecrophilia 2 years ago
I think it is "Music for Marcel Duchamp" for prepared Piano, written by John Cage
tryagaintodo 2 years ago 2
the piece is "Music for Marcel Duchamp" by john cage (1947) for prepared piano
a master piece absolutely
telemacohomewwod 2 years ago
thank you!
OdeToNecrophilia 2 years ago
John Cage
xLotteeee 1 year ago
Look at the music of John Cage, I supose he is the autor.
denicemf 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
4000 $ gratis!! habt ihr ne Ahnung gehabt, was ein coupon code ist? Ich auch nicht aber jetzt weiß ich es und es ist ein Wahnsinn, dass ich bei Lucky Red Casino exklusiv mit dem Coupon Code: TOPBONUS doppelte Mittel für mein Casinoerlebnis bekommen habe, ohne viel dafür zu tun! Das ist wirklich leicht verdientes Kies und Spaß an Zocken im Casino hab ich dabei auch noch!
ketevanoellnrea652 2 years ago
reminds me of david lynch
benusherr 2 years ago
Around 2:08 the woman finally has her top off ;)
patrickfaithart 2 years ago 12
pervert!!!
cibernetic 2 years ago
yeah and the movement of the circles forming spirals is finally unclock-wise too :).
eyesintheroad 1 year ago
I don't get it. I 'm sorry maybe I am too close-minded, uneducated or culturally lacking. Could please somebody explain/help me understand?
Thank you!
OfAwesomeWin 2 years ago 2
This work is experimental and pretty advanced for its time. Think of it as a dream.
pataphysician66 2 years ago 7
@pataphysician66 Yes, I find it interesting when people describe 'art' as advanced when now, the Hollywood entertainment machine since 'Bush' has been reduced to scavenging it's influences between comic books and children's stories......Can anyone prove me wrong....
Retrocyclers 1 month ago
I don't think that it's meant for understanding. Part of modern art is to reflect society and a lot of artists think that we can't understand life or society as it is.
Overture2008 2 years ago 2
I like the references to Marcel Duchamp's famous work, "Nude descending a staircase." The woman on that painting was broke up into lines to focus on the movement, and it seems like the music reflects that same idea.
declare1independence 2 years ago 4
I have to respectfully disagree. I too love Raymond Scott, however, assuming you're referring to his electronic music, he consciously designed it for commercials in the age of the Jetsons. This music by Cage and film by Duchamp was designed to express the thematic connection between musical sounds and natural geometric forms and physical movement. I miss the counterculture with its openness that this (and Raymond Scott) were emblematic of.
MrChirpsky 2 years ago
The music's ok - but I think there's a lot of Raymond Scott's music out there that would have been much better suited to this video!
musiloo 2 years ago
actually I'm not quite sure what does this film means can someone pls explain tome ? is the round disc means dreams ? ... or other meaning ?
reinedparis 2 years ago
you have to think of the context - experimental 60's influenced by hallucinagens, minimalism, op art and a search for the new through mistake and experiment. the meaning - if asking for one - is that the meaning is intrinsic to the medium. not meant to be philo or psychological - it is what it is.... but that's quite a difficult thing to achieve.
seanotoole927 2 years ago
The film was made in 1947 - the "experimental 60's" films, minimalism etc were influenced by this.
BulbousAlsoTapered 2 years ago 3
1947?! ... so you had the post surrealist step into abstraction and American 'road trip' intellectualism... Huxley was tripping around this time.
seanotoole927 2 years ago
The round disc is like one my father had showing wave motion (for people who are - say - learning physics) - it can mean dreams but I think they wanted to show the sound -music -image-space-motion interconnection - and I think if you just look at it and listen it can mean whatever you want it to.
quagapp 2 years ago
actually... I'm not quite understand what does this film means... can someone pls explain to me ? I did love to know more about it.. especially those rounds , what are they for ? does it mean dreams ?
reinedparis 2 years ago
I like forks in the sun.
TheFreakSupper 2 years ago
What the fuck were those guys taking?
lolfag93 2 years ago
WWII and Zen meditation... I think
xGuttix 2 years ago
very nice
bitachar 2 years ago
actually i'm not quite understand the ending, anyone can explain?
sebei 2 years ago
Heheh, a nude descending a staircase. classy touch, duchamp.
ajsmcs 2 years ago
feeling dizzy! HEADHIT LIGHT WORKS
stanmoonetc 2 years ago
This is a fantastic movie!!
So many great parts to it
sisterdiggins 2 years ago
fantastic work by cage and cunningham,the films works well with the music
stilly2009 2 years ago
shit, i AM gay. sorry guys.
hitlermugabetashtwin 2 years ago 2
I dont mind!!lol!!
josepolo950 2 years ago
Dude it's totally cool
frackle 2 years ago 2
Does anyone know what is the name of piece of music playing at the beginning? (Wouldn't it sound good on harp?) Thanks!
antetdi 3 years ago
Im not sure of the name, but I can tell you that it was written for Prepared Piano, meaning that John Cage presumably stuck a bunch of random things (paper clips, chewing gum, footie pajamas, shampoo bottles, dead babies, etc.) in a piano and used that as a way of composing: He removed a lot of his 'intention' from the music by not knowing how things would sound. He also did this by using chance operations. Pretty cool stuff though, if you like it, you should check out some of his other stuff.
somedude1129 2 years ago 2
Very culturally based.
PrimalShadow3 3 years ago
Hmm. Hard to tell if this is good or not. If theres a moral point, like the death of the salesman or the guy is bad then yes but its hard to tell.
ragnorakk 3 years ago
Simply put, yes, this good; no, there is no "moral" point.
ChadSmith1452 3 years ago
stupid
ginopepino3000 3 years ago
yes you are.
Salatta666 3 years ago
it is stupid
qrrb 3 years ago
situasionism rules...
nachopistola 3 years ago
2456.309-my paintings=379+Marcel+Cage
jon.
JonBibire 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
...
lol
voces são um bando de pseudo-intelectuais q tentam achar graça nisso
HAUHauhAUh
dadaismo,surrealismo,antiarte e etc
é p da um look
da risada e sai fora
HAUhauHAUHauHAUH
pazumo 3 years ago
e vc é pseudo-ouvinte de música classica
se enxerga cara
fernandojeon 3 years ago 2
~hey boys~
dizana1 3 years ago
DioMorgan è qui!
laurixima 3 years ago
You'll get what you ask for,..
If you dare!
gioni 3 years ago
You'll get what you ask for,..
If you dare!
gioni 3 years ago
thanks for posting this on youtube
bartnijstad 3 years ago
amazed really
transphormetic 3 years ago
this is the best video in the world.
dhatudharma 3 years ago
Putting Martha Graham, Marcel Duchamp, and John Cage together would be explosive, but who would be the additional poet?
(EE Cummings?)
Geonihilist 3 years ago
I would have thought James Joyce or Gertrude Stein myself.
egapnala65 3 years ago
Tremendísimos genios!
EgonSchiele2 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
alright genius' ready to be mind blown, this isnt the original. so you can all stop arguing about duchamp, the original was silent, black and white and went for 7 minutes, they are the same disks bearing spirals yeah, but this isnt duchamps original work
nanathan 3 years ago
Original??? What is it? Original is not a qord for Marcel Duchamp. This is a Richter's film with approvation of Duchamp and John Cage, of course. A bunch of bad guys!!
imaduba 3 years ago 5
@nanathan you're wrong, the "original" you're referring to is anemic cinema made by Duchamp in 1926.
This is a sequence of "dreams that money can buy" by Richter, which uses Duchamp's 'rotoreliefs', made in 1935. Those rotoreliefs stuff are similar in style with the 'anemic cinema' film, but in fact they're a different thing.
Petroptr 1 year ago
desde Rimbaud, la vanguardia sigue su camino de largo, paciente y razonado desarreglo de todos los sentidos
MLaruelle 3 years ago 3
this is best, than my duchamps video
necrosifilis 3 years ago
Mmmm, crazy, the spiral looks like the Vertigo label.
psaavedrat 3 years ago
mysterious and wonderful
jeemobon 3 years ago
I like this video as the music and video goes very well together. But as for the ''excellent metaphors'' I don't believe there are any. Anyone who says otherwise should really explain what those metaphors are or where the ''deepness'' in it lies. Otherwise it's likely s/he is just trying to gain status from the elitist person-fixated social construct known as art by seeming ''deep'' without really having a clue, which is really fucking annoying.
SwedxSimon 3 years ago 2
depth can only be experienced in the simple places.
cosmosbound 3 years ago
SwedxSimon, could you please expatiate on your observation that art is an "elitist person-fixated social construct"?
polymath7 3 years ago
I very much enjoyed that.
jookyle 3 years ago
It doesn't do much for me, and I'm into weird shit you know ;) It's just quite static and all.
Waranoa 4 years ago
Rrose Selavy
parespayer 4 years ago
Some of the comments above are prompted by people not having the necessary intellect to UNDERSTAND,let and leave them stupid!
Sefardisafran 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
you dont need intellect to understand this nonesense, the word intellect comes from europe my friend, i hope your old enough to admit that, this is just a little bug for people to debate on, not to buy tickets and listen to this bullshit.
albul13 4 years ago
Disingenuous, and condescending. It takes more than put-downs to convince someone of your point. But I have to question if you are even interested in changing anyone's mind so much as expressing your disgust. Well, enjoy your freedom of expression as Cage and Duchamp have.
iwanttowatchsomethin 3 years ago 11
albul, go back to reading NOTW, watch jane goody on telly,you're out of your depth talking about Duchamp, don't exhaust your intellect, remember you don't have one my friend as it comes from europe.
blackbagel 3 years ago
good. thanx
TheatreOfTheAbsurd 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Some people like spam, but some people do not like spam. It is interesting to note the differences in attitude. Are you a spam enthusiast? Consider your reactions to spam, and try to evaluate where you stand in the great spam debate.
WiseWordsAboutSpam 4 years ago
Well, those were certainly the wisest words I have ever heard on the subject of spam. That really has given me something to think about. Such profundity, such insight ...
assholesmoreassholes 4 years ago
dadatube
pedrovictor 4 years ago
bollocks
RightUpYourAss 4 years ago
this is not DADA
Unbihexium 4 years ago
Duchamp wasn't really a Dadaist, he went through a lot of stages, but he was a surrealist more than anything.
ORLYxXxYARLY 4 years ago
Duchamp was nothing but himself
lolmusique 3 years ago 2
I have mixed feelings about Duchamp lolmusique, but your comment, it seems to me, is nothing but cryptic pseudoprofundity.
polymath7 3 years ago
Just like yours. Anyway, what I have said is right. I mean dadaism and Cage's theory of music is different. That's all.
Unbihexium 3 years ago
this shit hypnatizes me
aalaimo512 4 years ago
Love it.Bring back Dada....
OLinLeeds 4 years ago
bollocks
odqq 4 years ago
'nude descending a staircase' - brilliant.
melawel 4 years ago 2
seriously...wtf is this!?
kevindomb1445 4 years ago
It's the sound-image of a billion minds refusing to think....
tonyztuba 4 years ago 2
bro..
this is a, Artistic Movement emerged in Europe and North America. Appeared in Zurich, Switzerland between 1916 and 1922 with Tristan Tzara as its founder. It was a violent past opposition to the First World War.
Dada comes as a total ideology as a way of life and as an absolute rejection of any tradition or previous scheme
Cinema dada -
locoxpoco 4 years ago
nothing special :]
anathemeee 4 years ago
nothing spacial :]
anathemeee 4 years ago
Great¡¡¡
luludeuva 4 years ago
sweet combination
fbamca 4 years ago
I kept expecting Rod Serling begin narrating.
Screamgreats 4 years ago
*Hysterics!*
WickedWildStylesDead 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
God John Cage is terrible!
pishdad 4 years ago
He did a good film with Rahsaan Roland Kirk called "Sound". It is a really good explanation of why the two very different artists used extra-musical sound, which he's not really doing here. I don't know enough about Cage to do apologetics for him, but Kirk is one of the great Jazz-men.
GolumTR 4 years ago 2
No...he was a brilliant man and a great innovator. The music here is intended to be as abstract or random as Duchamp's images. Look up John Cage on wikipedia.I think you'll find it interesting; he made a lot of important contributions to modern music.
dos4gw82 4 years ago
I know all about John Cage. I don't consider him.
pishdad 4 years ago
consider him...?
dos4gw82 4 years ago
I don't consider him to be very interesting, thought provoking. His work is rather 1-dimensional. It doesn't reach into the higher realms of art- it's tapestry music and I believe shallow. That's my opinion- nothing revolutionary about Cage. Now Bartok is a whole different thing all together. Whey you place Bartok next to Cage one should see what I mean- see the many layers of Bartok.
pishdad 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Where do you stand in the great bullshit debate? What are your views about bullshit? Is it a significant social force? Is it an important element of modern society? Has bullshit developed in recent years? Is the quality of bullshit as high as in the 1990s? Or do you not have views? Do you need advice from a bullshit guidance expert?
Should bullshit become a way of life? Should the future of bullshit be regulated by government legislation, or by qualified independent consultants?
TheBigBullshitDebate 4 years ago 3
Bullshit is a marvellous thing.
jksvblkj 4 years ago
in emule you have the film
imaduba 4 years ago
hey, where did you get it?
dethes808 4 years ago
this is not 2007
mikongo 4 years ago
"music for marcel duchamp"
ernesto1985 4 years ago
very excellent metamorphs
JJ77TTUU3 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Cut the intellectual crap. This is bollocks.
BiggestErectionInUSA 4 years ago
Dansbuelle.
mplatitysn 4 years ago