Would the colour of the burning not be a product of the metal salt doping and the potassium chlorate? Would the potassium of the potassium chlorate not give a kind of purple colour?
I do hope you gave the jelly babies names before you dispatched them .
I always thought they just called jelly beans jelly babies in England, I had no idea they had jelly candies that were actually SHAPED like babies! Some cultural knowledge to go with the chemistry... very good, chaps!
well, in america a jelly baby is what gay men shit out after gay butt sex. its now referred to as "santorum" after a republican who was running for president.
this equation is wrong, heating kclo3 does not turn it into kcl, the whole point of this reaction is when the molten kclo4 comes onto contact with the sugar source it then liberates the oxygen in the kclo4 to rapidly burn(oxidise) the sugar. when you heat kclo3 or kclo4 you dont change them in to kcl(which is very unreactive) if that were the case kcl would work if you heated it and it most definately does not. decomp of kclo3 does turn into kcl but this is not decomp its gentle heating.
@atourdeforce I disagree; the decomp. temperature of KClO3 is 400 C, and that flame is almost certainly hotter than that. However, the effect is the same; even if it is the gummy bear that initiates the liberation of oxygen, the equation is still correct. It shouldn't be called "fusion", though.
@fuzzybudgie I was once upon a time an explosives expert, b4 I finally choose to do medicine, and any1 with chemistry should know this reaction cannot take place without the oxygen in the kclo3 being liberated in the reaction with the sugar to oxidise it to carbon and water, etc. while the decomp temp is correct, and that type of flame they use gets as hot as 600c the molten chlorate is nowhere near as hot as that, you can melt chlorate on a hot plate at 300-350c, ergo its still intact. try it.
@atourdeforce another way to prove im right is to melt some chlorate in a test tube to melting point, let it cool break out the soild lump, now according to every1 you now should have kcl, grind this up and add powered sugar in a 50/50 ratio and ignite with a match on a meter stick to be safe(this stuff makes a big flame) NOW IF IT WAS KCL IT WOULD NOT REACT WITH THE SUGAR, PROVING IT IS STILL KCLO3. if i have time in the next week or 2 i may do a vid to prove this.
@atourdeforce chances are she was being lazy and got that equation straight from the internet, as the first equation i seen is this one which i promise you is wrong.
Since it appears that envelopes are being pushed around...it would be fantastic if each video could end with a summary (in standard format) not only with the reactions, but also brief citations of where in nature its equivalent would be found, and why it's important to us. What prompted me to ask was that I was just thinking that very thing when she mentioned it in the video!
In your equations you didn't show the first step (melting/fusing), which presumably is KClO3(s) -> KCl03(l) ? Seems odd to describe fusing with only (s) and (g) and no (l) state... ;-)
I did this same demo for a group of kids once, and after ignition I closed the hood and realized I had forgotten a Winchester full of ether on the other end of the hood. Just about pooped myself after seeing it.
i think why it ejected was because the inside heated at a different rate then the outside (kinda like a marshmellow over a fire, how the outside comes off when you take it off the slick) and so the core stuck and the outside got propelled outwards.... i'm just a Gr. 9 middle school student though =)
@RomanNumural9 You're right. The heat that the outside surface is exposed to carbonizes it quickly, which acts as a heat shield for the inside. You rightly identified the *rate* of increase in temperature as the important factor. I have to differ from you on the mechanics behind it: I suggest that it the ejection of the liquefied core due to pressure build-up as well as the drag caused by the rapidly escaping gasses, that propelled it forward, like a rocket in a tornado. IMHO.
We did this experiment about three times 2 weeks ago, as part of a excursion for primary schools (pupils of 4th grade visit our school to learn sth about science). I was told there is Cl-5 and K-3 or so and the teacher told us to not inhale too much of the "smoke" (dunno if its smoke or fog) created so i thought the potassium chloride itself reacts with the sugar. Now you tell me its just oxidation of sugar... I am confused, can anyone clear me up?
@grahamkeithtodd Can't find them in America either. I've never even heard of Jelly Babies before this video came along. Throughout the entire video I was saying, "What the @#$% is a Jelly Baby?!"
What I would suspect is that the Jelly Babies are coated with a wax as a preservative - which is probably what created the 'shell', don't you think? It was probably why you get a false start and the delayed fizzing start before it busts loose.
i love chemistry and this....... but i`m not to understand whaat us said... can u please put subtitle please ..... because i`m learning chemistry not in english.
can you go more in depth with the chemistry and show the enthopy change and equilibriums in the reaction and also discuss in more detail what's going on on an atomic level ? thanks
I'm not a chemistry student or anything like that, but I thought the chemical explanation at the end was very interesting and understandable! Thanks! :)
I think it's in the interest of science to figure out how to replicate the first attempt at the experiment where the reaction left a hollowed out carbon corpse of the jelly baby.
Your exothermic portion of the reaction (on the white sheet of paper) appears imbalanced. You list 5 sugar and 12 oxygen making 12 carbon-dioxide and 11 water, but it should be only 1 sugar.
I. Love. Molecular. Videos. They are the best. Seriously. Thanks so much for these! Some more human related ones, like the salbutamol and (to an extent) aspirin and morphine would be even more awesome!
FAIL
NormacHC 1 day ago
The soot looks like a bitch to clean off the glassware
altosax1st 4 days ago
This happens all the time in our bodies.
grande1899 6 days ago in playlist Uploaded videos
it was too big thats why it failed
diegonikki 1 week ago
Not one, not two, but FOUR jelly babies.
WeaselordsLair 1 week ago
Looks like poop
mrninjap00p 2 weeks ago in playlist Uploaded videos
This has been flagged as spam show
すごい動画を発見したよ♪♪
一億円くれるとか、ホントかな~?
動画検索で[ わうか ]って探してみてください!!
本当に貰った人は教えてください♪♪
yuyuyuyuyuyu014 2 weeks ago
I wouldnt want to be the guy who has to clean all those test tubes.
Skandalos 2 weeks ago in playlist Uploaded videos 4
At 2:25 when he picked it up I thought he was gong to eat it.
saveroftheday 2 weeks ago
Isn't that last reaction, you know...life on Earth?
akashashen 2 weeks ago
How to recognise a proper entertainment chemist: The best reactions are ones we can scale up!
akashashen 2 weeks ago
I'm a gummy bear. Yes, I'm a gummy bear. Oh I’m a yummy tummy funny lucky gummy bear.
akashashen 2 weeks ago
WE WANT AN EPISODE MADE BY NEIL!
TheArengorn 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
每天幫老闆賺取大筆鈔票自己卻只有那一點?
你想脫離貧窮嗎?想成為那富裕的1%嗎?
全球網路系統 每分每秒都有人加入我們的成功行列
你還在坐著觀望嗎?快點搭上這班成功的列車吧!
免費報名註冊試用90天
ipie.ftp.cc <<請複製網址前往
fewfable 2 weeks ago
Bugger the blast screen.
jbeer82 3 weeks ago
We wouldn't be allowed to do anything like that in school -_- Kind of annoying how all of the health and safety rules get in the way of experiments.
daggerheart03 3 weeks ago
@daggerheart03 We did it in school in Year 9 (Age 12-13) Well... The teacher did it.
BanBangDS 3 weeks ago
Would the colour of the burning not be a product of the metal salt doping and the potassium chlorate? Would the potassium of the potassium chlorate not give a kind of purple colour?
I do hope you gave the jelly babies names before you dispatched them .
philipanthonyorr 3 weeks ago
Let's hand over to neil -click- OOH FIRE :3
DannyFox06 3 weeks ago 2
looked like the large reaction threw a LOT of UV.
ReddmanDGZ 3 weeks ago
I always thought they just called jelly beans jelly babies in England, I had no idea they had jelly candies that were actually SHAPED like babies! Some cultural knowledge to go with the chemistry... very good, chaps!
otakucode 3 weeks ago
@otakucode Are you saying you've never eaten a jelly baby, cuz they're proper scrumptious.
insignia9989 2 weeks ago
3 people were jelly babies
mikeymikemikey1 3 weeks ago in playlist Uploaded videos
This is what happens in my stomache :)
mikeytheaznking 3 weeks ago in playlist Uploaded videos
Just goes to show you the amount of potential energy stored in sugars.
JosephGubbels 3 weeks ago in playlist Uploaded videos
Poor jelly baby! :(
8runomar5 3 weeks ago
I love that she has her proper pearls and hair piece on for this ....
danamdkny 3 weeks ago 9
@danamdkny Looks like she's going to the opera right after the experiment, lol.
jq747 3 weeks ago
They didn't say "Don't do this at home"...
I'M GOING TO DO THIS AT HOME!!!
kevinhykuo1 4 weeks ago
Welcome to research!
JSniegowski100 4 weeks ago
"Lets hand over to Neil"
Neil: *BLOWTORCH*
:D
djehuty13 4 weeks ago 8
well, in america a jelly baby is what gay men shit out after gay butt sex. its now referred to as "santorum" after a republican who was running for president.
supermegabeast9000 4 weeks ago
@alex a jelly baby is the uk equivalent to a gummy bear. Except jelly baby's are softer and coated in a light sugar similar to icing sugar.
warrmr 4 weeks ago
Maybe there was a certain substance/residue enveloping the surface of the ref jelly baby, or it was just an old piece of candy.
quickknowledge 4 weeks ago
jez looks like poop
annyakov 4 weeks ago
The rxns at the end made this my new favorite video! :)
liquidefeline 4 weeks ago
dingo ate your baybay
MightyJustas 4 weeks ago
"Jelly baby corpse"
Lovely
denisfilming 4 weeks ago 3
When the jelly babies were being reacted, I swear I can hear them screaming "noooo noooooo"
07BabeMagnet 1 month ago
gummy bear homicide...
scorpserpent 1 month ago
Great!Please,can you do the synthesis of PbCl4,I know that is hard?
MrPOSITIVELIFE 1 month ago
2:29 The test tube gods are displeased with your sacrifice!
Direkin 1 month ago 2
i like that the collective noun for jelly baby is a "chorus" of jelly babies
thecosgrove 1 month ago
Maybe do it in annotation form? (the chemical reactions)
JusticeSportsman 1 month ago
Thanks for the chemical reaction at the end! Love it!
JusticeSportsman 1 month ago
this equation is wrong, heating kclo3 does not turn it into kcl, the whole point of this reaction is when the molten kclo4 comes onto contact with the sugar source it then liberates the oxygen in the kclo4 to rapidly burn(oxidise) the sugar. when you heat kclo3 or kclo4 you dont change them in to kcl(which is very unreactive) if that were the case kcl would work if you heated it and it most definately does not. decomp of kclo3 does turn into kcl but this is not decomp its gentle heating.
atourdeforce 1 month ago
@atourdeforce I disagree; the decomp. temperature of KClO3 is 400 C, and that flame is almost certainly hotter than that. However, the effect is the same; even if it is the gummy bear that initiates the liberation of oxygen, the equation is still correct. It shouldn't be called "fusion", though.
fuzzybudgie 1 month ago
@fuzzybudgie I was once upon a time an explosives expert, b4 I finally choose to do medicine, and any1 with chemistry should know this reaction cannot take place without the oxygen in the kclo3 being liberated in the reaction with the sugar to oxidise it to carbon and water, etc. while the decomp temp is correct, and that type of flame they use gets as hot as 600c the molten chlorate is nowhere near as hot as that, you can melt chlorate on a hot plate at 300-350c, ergo its still intact. try it.
atourdeforce 1 month ago
@atourdeforce another way to prove im right is to melt some chlorate in a test tube to melting point, let it cool break out the soild lump, now according to every1 you now should have kcl, grind this up and add powered sugar in a 50/50 ratio and ignite with a match on a meter stick to be safe(this stuff makes a big flame) NOW IF IT WAS KCL IT WOULD NOT REACT WITH THE SUGAR, PROVING IT IS STILL KCLO3. if i have time in the next week or 2 i may do a vid to prove this.
atourdeforce 1 month ago
@atourdeforce chances are she was being lazy and got that equation straight from the internet, as the first equation i seen is this one which i promise you is wrong.
atourdeforce 1 month ago
@fuzzybudgie Fusion is just the scientific name for "melting". It doesn't always mean putting stuff together.
AlexSh789 4 weeks ago
We did a similar experiment in high school with nitric acid... Only without the heating.
It was a disturbing reaction.
tybo09 1 month ago
Is the large porcelain dish Neil's way of avoiding having to clean up?
98JMA 1 month ago
I am totally for chemical formulas on each and every periodicvideos video.
rageagainstthebath 1 month ago 55
it is gummy bear (soft jelly candies in form of bears or animals)
bobojia 1 month ago
Converting sugar into carbon dioxide. Now that's a waste. ;)
rageagainstthebath 1 month ago
I think of this reaction as the opposite to photosynthesis:
In photosynthesis, light, H20, and CO2 are taken in and as a result you get O2 and Sugar.
In this experiment you put in Sugar and O2. As a result you get H20, CO2, and Light.
Probably just my strange method of thinking about things :)
danagol1985 1 month ago
@danagol1985 sugar + O2 giving h2o co2 + energy is essentially cellular respiration but with a different sugar
Jcd1994 1 month ago
@Jcd1994 Ah, I see. Thank you for your reply. :)
danagol1985 1 month ago
"A jelly baby corpse -- is what it is." lol
bobbytookalook 1 month ago
@bobbytookalook that's not what she said: "THAT'S what it it is"
Z6U6Z6U 1 month ago
Quick, someone think up some dead jelly baby jokes!
SuperAdamMan64 1 month ago
Screeming jelly babies hooked me in year 7 at school i never gave up science after that moment
stephanied2604 1 month ago
"The best reactions are the ones that you can scale up..."
ijunkie 1 month ago
Supported by Aldrich. Nice!
mvszao 1 month ago
Haha six eyes
ihuuhme100 1 month ago 2
Since it appears that envelopes are being pushed around...it would be fantastic if each video could end with a summary (in standard format) not only with the reactions, but also brief citations of where in nature its equivalent would be found, and why it's important to us. What prompted me to ask was that I was just thinking that very thing when she mentioned it in the video!
mokopa 1 month ago
NEIL IS IN THE THUMBNAIL. INSTACLICK.
Jamster9000 1 month ago 74
@Jamster9000 Gayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy!!!
smeggerss 1 month ago
nice smoke genrater :P
chemicalbombgang 1 month ago
Comment removed
chemicalbombgang 1 month ago
Bravo on the chemical summation. Top Shelf!
birddog2017 1 month ago
what sorcery is this?
SuperLaugh20 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I love that sound at beginning. It sounds like some choral from epic soundtrack.
DudokX 1 month ago
I love that sound at beginning. It sounds like some choral from epic soundtrack.
DudokX 1 month ago
Can you please try this with powdered sugar. I assume it will produce a more vigorous reaction.
Bryan6446 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
4:20 Please do it in 'Barking Dog' scale =)
saps0809 1 month ago
Comment removed
saps0809 1 month ago
What about pure sugar?
UltraDrago2000 1 month ago
Anyone thinking next "fusion" rocket... *troll face/troll science*
UltraDrago2000 1 month ago
She has nice lips
djtorne 1 month ago
i like that you added the chemical equation at the end, for us nerds :)
catsfromhell1 1 month ago
Would you like some fried retinas with those incinerated jelly babies?
ScrinMan 1 month ago
Watch (shade) your eyes?, pretty bright - possible UV or retina burn like from welding...
tommynights 1 month ago
Somewhere....the Doctor is crying
Agaettis 1 month ago
Random question... were they using sour Jelly Babies?
shalafi4 1 month ago
fastest way to ruin test tubes :)
Raddan2010 1 month ago
Great video Brady.
I'm so glad that they expalin the reaction on a piece of paper.
I always use Aldrich Chemistry to do my lab notes.
Ciweman 1 month ago
Comment removed
Ciweman 1 month ago
In your equations you didn't show the first step (melting/fusing), which presumably is KClO3(s) -> KCl03(l) ? Seems odd to describe fusing with only (s) and (g) and no (l) state... ;-)
ib9rt 1 month ago
I did this same demo for a group of kids once, and after ignition I closed the hood and realized I had forgotten a Winchester full of ether on the other end of the hood. Just about pooped myself after seeing it.
Foxclass 1 month ago
I can't stand green jelly babies either. =^・・^=
petokyo 1 month ago
Neil gets to clean up as usual?
AntiProtonBoy 1 month ago
whoaaa
sc0rpi0n0 1 month ago
We called this reaction "The screaming gummy bear." It was always popular with children visiting our labs.
canadianentropy 1 month ago
i think why it ejected was because the inside heated at a different rate then the outside (kinda like a marshmellow over a fire, how the outside comes off when you take it off the slick) and so the core stuck and the outside got propelled outwards.... i'm just a Gr. 9 middle school student though =)
RomanNumural9 1 month ago
@RomanNumural9 You're right. The heat that the outside surface is exposed to carbonizes it quickly, which acts as a heat shield for the inside. You rightly identified the *rate* of increase in temperature as the important factor. I have to differ from you on the mechanics behind it: I suggest that it the ejection of the liquefied core due to pressure build-up as well as the drag caused by the rapidly escaping gasses, that propelled it forward, like a rocket in a tornado. IMHO.
mokopa 1 month ago
We did this experiment about three times 2 weeks ago, as part of a excursion for primary schools (pupils of 4th grade visit our school to learn sth about science). I was told there is Cl-5 and K-3 or so and the teacher told us to not inhale too much of the "smoke" (dunno if its smoke or fog) created so i thought the potassium chloride itself reacts with the sugar. Now you tell me its just oxidation of sugar... I am confused, can anyone clear me up?
JumpingNoCrime 1 month ago
Wow, thumbs up for chemical formulae!
sachamm 1 month ago
What happened to the potassium and the chlorine?
Does the KClO3 just act as an oxidizing agent by giving off O as it fuses?
Surely there are some potassium oxides formed as well right?
TerminalRhinoVirus 1 month ago
jelly baybays
zaSpeaker 1 month ago
All you needed was for Tom Baker to be there.
Prelota 1 month ago
The hollowed out shell of a jelly baby... that is unbelievably poignant.
sm0kingJay 1 month ago
I had a shot of Jack every time someone said "Jelly Baby".
culwin 1 month ago 24
Comment removed
MrGuitarZeppelin 1 month ago
@culwin Really? I had a shot every time Neil didn't
MrGuitarZeppelin 1 month ago
@culwin are you alive?
chipalike 1 month ago
@culwin Mine ran out
un2mensch 1 month ago
What's a Jelly Baby?
Ricalloo 1 month ago 27
@Ricalloo It appears to be a British candy similar to a gummy bear.
Getsius 1 month ago
@Ricalloo "Growling Gummy Bear." It's basically a gummy bear.
boredomdisease 1 month ago
@Ricalloo a small baby shaped jelly confection with a firm outer crust
Pianoguy32 1 month ago
@Ricalloo Gummi Bears in England
Skalarski21 1 month ago
@Ricalloo it is a sugar based sweet(or candy) that is formed in the shape of a baby!
well loved and enjoyed very much by both British kids and time lords!
they come in a wide range of colours(british spelling)
and i can not find them anywhere here in Canada! :-(
grahamkeithtodd 1 month ago
@grahamkeithtodd Can't find them in America either. I've never even heard of Jelly Babies before this video came along. Throughout the entire video I was saying, "What the @#$% is a Jelly Baby?!"
AlexSh789 4 weeks ago
WAIT. Was Neil smiling before the credits rolled?!?
HolyBmXfReAk2 1 month ago
@HolyBmXfReAk2
lol, Yes he was! lol, Don't know about you, I miss seeing Neil on the periodic tables lol
DrWestofReanimation 1 month ago
camera on retort stand? AWWW YEAH!
Cickarn 1 month ago
What I would suspect is that the Jelly Babies are coated with a wax as a preservative - which is probably what created the 'shell', don't you think? It was probably why you get a false start and the delayed fizzing start before it busts loose.
Nexus2Eden 1 month ago
I was saying... "Wait for it..wait for it...." Ha!
Nexus2Eden 1 month ago
2:28 Call Ducky. Neil has created another victim.
pepsibookcat 1 month ago
There is a problem with the video....it's missing a "love it" button. Pressed Like twice, but I don't think it worked. :)
toobeetoobeetoo 1 month ago
i love chemistry and this....... but i`m not to understand whaat us said... can u please put subtitle please ..... because i`m learning chemistry not in english.
Rebecca97Black 1 month ago
Does this reaction produce any appreciable thrust?
JimPrower 1 month ago
@JimPrower Thrust has more to do with the shape of the vessel, the nozzle and the fluid dynamics.
It's not something that's associated with chemistry per se.
endimion17 1 month ago
can you go more in depth with the chemistry and show the enthopy change and equilibriums in the reaction and also discuss in more detail what's going on on an atomic level ? thanks
WildeByName1 1 month ago
Just eating one now!
rjal1992 1 month ago
I would love to see the "barking dog" scaled up version. Can it happen? =)
vpacolis 1 month ago
make a video on Neil!
iBO0M 1 month ago
We did this my Chem 20 Honours class in high school. Kinda fun
carlsoto1747 1 month ago
I'm not a chemistry student or anything like that, but I thought the chemical explanation at the end was very interesting and understandable! Thanks! :)
johnclavis 1 month ago
Comment removed
osakanone 1 month ago
wake up this morning, go onto youtube and get to watch this :)
made my day
mooooooooimacow 1 month ago
Green is the superior colour, Thumbs up for Green!
AGDCrompton 1 month ago
Wow, pretty awesome!
sooth15 1 month ago
We need Neil to head a video with a reaction he likes, although I wonder if watching his video would put us on a watch list. lol
HWGuyEG 1 month ago 3
ahh ive done that in school :D makes a lot of smoke that floats on the ceiling
HRHooChicken 1 month ago
How can we be disappointed so early into the first attempt? We got fire, I think that's a win.
alecjahn 1 month ago
I wonder if all the three laws are properly working inside Neil's "brain". He looks potentialy dangerous in this.
Also, I think they forgot to install the voice module. He never says a word!
slpk 1 month ago
@slpk from memory Neil says something in the potassium video?
wattcoffee 1 month ago
@wattcoffee He does in the video when they were smashing chocolate eggs. He says "thanks Pete...". ^^ And who's the real fan now?
Phacias 1 month ago
that is a shell of it former self
aten747 1 month ago
:O We shall use jelly babies to power us to the stars
retsilla88 1 month ago
wtf is jelly baby
0Banjo0 1 month ago 2
@0Banjo0 it's a British candy. Kinda like a gummy bear but not quite I believe. Never actually had one. shaped like a baby as you can see.
Marrithegreat1 1 month ago
@0Banjo0 google it
bit bigger than gummy bears, and are shaped like babies, taste just as good
mooooooooimacow 1 month ago
@0Banjo0 British gummy bear-like thing.
TheGzeus 1 month ago
My chemistry teacher tried this and the test tube exploded lol
ELijahKan10 1 month ago
lol "Let's hand it over to Neil" *ignition
Cellogamer 1 month ago
But will it blend?
kanjitard 1 month ago
Neil is awesome.
mobabur94 1 month ago
Once again Brady proves he has the greatest job ever. Hot science chicks, exothermic reactions and Neil! So jealous.
KamekoBruns 1 month ago
@KamekoBruns hot chick? where?
insanic1 1 month ago
@insanic1 Dr. Tang of course!
KamekoBruns 1 month ago
what happens to the chlorine atom??
themorganator4 1 month ago
Cool reaction and thanks for taking the time to go over the reaction.
Ezrick13 1 month ago
Wasting innocent jelly babies, the Doctor disapproves...
... Though the experiment is awesome
EddyScbr 1 month ago
Where can I find a small camera like the one you used in this video and the 3D glasses video?
sugvcreeper 1 month ago
@sugvcreeper That's almost certainly an HD Hero of some model, available from lots of different places.
fidgejufter 1 month ago
I think Neil is a scary...
moredread100 1 month ago
Amazing, almost makes me wish i tried harder in school! But then i wouldn't be doing what i do now!!!
CantBeSober 1 month ago
I think it's in the interest of science to figure out how to replicate the first attempt at the experiment where the reaction left a hollowed out carbon corpse of the jelly baby.
RaineXHero 1 month ago
Was showed this in my chem lesson the other day :)
icyclough 1 month ago
I think the question on everyone's lips is: what would happen if you used a Mento instead of a jelly baby?
theHiddenStone 1 month ago
Nice to see a video in which Neil plays a prominent role. He seems to be a man of few words, but I'd love to see an interview with him.
disorganizedorg 1 month ago
Your exothermic portion of the reaction (on the white sheet of paper) appears imbalanced. You list 5 sugar and 12 oxygen making 12 carbon-dioxide and 11 water, but it should be only 1 sugar.
TheReaverOfDarkness 1 month ago
I. Love. Molecular. Videos. They are the best. Seriously. Thanks so much for these! Some more human related ones, like the salbutamol and (to an extent) aspirin and morphine would be even more awesome!
collegehumorrules 1 month ago
Who knew science could be so much fun? :D
YY4Me133 1 month ago
* "Science rules" *
darkbrayan1 1 month ago
Do sour patch kids,those damn little rascals get on my nerves, but then they are so sweet after.
QuantumDisciple7 1 month ago
Comment removed
inulalala 1 month ago
"Lets hand over to Neil', "flick pshhhhhhhhh" Neils the man!
taydigidy 1 month ago 2
must this be done in a fume hood as shown?
xsonicbladex 1 month ago
@xsonicbladex : Or outside.
pyropakman 1 month ago