Added: 1 year ago
From: cappucinokid100
Views: 42,025
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (88)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • WATCH "9/11 THE THIRD TRUTH..."

    TO KNOW THE TRUTH.

  • Yeaa Usa is biggest Terrorist !

  • damn shithead, this is not "slow motion", that is just you slowing it down frame by frame...

  • @Ivanejsing that's how slow motion works lol, even with high-speed cameras. you expect the house to fall slowly so it it could be filmed slow-motion?

  • this is one of the first time that this subject can be discussed on a normal way ..without ending in redule , blame .........thats positive

    greetings

  • @cappucinokid100 It couldnt. Just like the tube train when I felt a train coming a kilometer away. It was really just a big fan they use to trick me.

  • You wont ever see a building fall like this again unless they start demolishing buildings from the top down and not wraping blast tarps around it... this is just rediculise it should of fell like a tree hit with an axe with the story that they want us to trust...

  • @11kungfu11 trees are monolithic structures without millions of separtate connections. These connections are the weakest points in a structure. Once a shock load from above is introduced, the connections get overcome and fail. other, shorter buildings have just toppled over but none of this size and immense mass. A simple connections analogy: Build a card house, then drop a brick on top, did your card house go timber?

  • @Fireman27852 The structure of the supports of WTC and all modern buldings have an interlocking core that take the load evenly everywhere and when a part is damaged say a plane hitting it, the rest of the interlocking core take the load. The WTC towers were designed to take multiple fully loaded 707's hitting them each, Look it up. If it were to weaken to the point of a collapse it would of been like the weak point of a tree more then half way cut with an axe, It would of fell over

  • @11kungfu11 I've looked it up, they were designed to take an impact of one plane, which they did initially. They were not designed to withstand the massive fire that ensued. The fires greatly affected the trusses and other components to the point of failure. Once the connections are weakened past their point of survival, the global collapse happens. Debunkin911dotcom has alot of videos and independent sources confirming a lot of this. and answers 99% of all the questions.

  • @Fireman27852 To quote it directly " It could withstand an impact of a fully loaded 707, infact it could handle multiple"...

    Massive fire? say like CCTV HQ in beijing? or a 15 min after burn of carpet and desks, as the fire was dying off over the next hour or so? Ive seen debunking911 its teh offical story put onto a website lol, Believe what you want mate. I believe there needs to be a reinvestigation because its clear the offical story was botched and it answers no where near 99%...

  • @11kungfu11 There was a lot more than carpet and desks burning. The fire was "dying off"? guess that's why it burned itself out after an hour or so huh? Or did it burn for weeks? Debunking 911 shows the most common conspiracy theories and offers pretty clear proof through independent videos, experts, witnesses etc. of why they're referred to as myths. You guys give our govt too much credit that they are smart enough to do something like this and execute a massive cover up.

  • @Fireman27852 where there is smoke there is a dying fire, Thought everyone knew that.. the building was not in flames like the CCTV HQ in Beijing (youtube that before and after).

    There was malten steel for weeks under the rubble, fused together.

    They are not myths lol the magic bullet that killed kenedy is a myth and cover up this this 'conspiracy' stuff is eye witnesses from the firemen radios, clean up crews and survivors who keep mysteriously dying (look that up) there is more to the story.

  • @11kungfu11 Also, didn't the lead structural engineer talk extensively on how his calculations were based on a lighter 707 flying at about 180mph, not a 767 going about 500+mph? I know there were later claims made by the port authority of the higher speeds but the guy who actually did the calculations basically scoffs at this and calls them gross exaggerations. Also, fire behavior isn't like it is in the movies. Materials used today burn a lot hotter than in the past.

  • @Fireman27852 The lead engineer did'nt specify 180mph he spoke about the interlocking core acting like a mesh tube that if a plane hit it, It would be like poking a pencil threw the mesh. He then stated that it could take fully loaded 707's going at top speed hitting it, infact multiple. materials in buildings are fire retardent materials by law, for that purpose. They dont make walls and carpets out of ammonium nitrate lol

    and that big fire ball was all the fuel burning up.

  • @Fireman27852 Its clear from fire fighters radios that many floors had the guts blown out of them such as the basement, floors 7,8 for sure and many eyewitnesses from other buildings say there was huge flashes in the windows many storys below the impacts, and also people who came out of the towers stating it sounded like chinese new year then big explosions afterward. If the fire did melt the impact area whould it not of made the top section flop over as the steel weakens? not stright down lol

  • @11kungfu11 they did flop over initially until the weight collapsed the remaining support structures. other explosions could have been from gas build up, the jet fuel could have gone down the freight elevator to the basement, etc. my point is everything i've seen has very plausible reasons. I'm still of the opinion our govt isn't smart enough to pull this conspiracy off. Seems they could have pulled off much simpler false flags if they wanted to start a war.

  • @Fireman27852 If the top section floped over because of melting, and the floors below still maintained full structural integrity the damaged floors would have no hope in completly collapsing everything below it, would'nt logic tell you?

    The jet fuel WAS the big fire ball when it struck the building mate lol.

    Id say at absolute least the government allowed it too happen considering the people were known terroists and monitored. Kenedy was a conspiracy from you gov. just as this is.

  • @Fireman27852 and lets say a small amount of fuel DID somehow get into the freight evelator shaft it would of had to fall about 100 floors? and explode in two sperate areas to completly destroy the locations as the firemen stated that floors 7,8 where completly demolished.

    So how do you figure "everything i've seen has very plausible reasons" ??

    Id say there needs to be a international re investigation.

  • @cappucinokid100

    It is demo charges,

    the building were hermetically sealed....

  • Yes, i can agree that the building collapses due to the damage (with planes or no planes)

    It starts... like it should start collapsing (no questioning that!)

    I do not agree that the building keeps on falling like it did!

    (it tips over!)

    The problem is: How can you fly a plane into a building, and detonate the building with explosives? Thats a very big risk! What if the plane missed its objective? What if the plane did not enter the building? Questioning is wisdom... answering is wisdumb

  • first of all,the north tower got hit first.(okay)then the south (okay)then after 15 minutes the south tower fell.then after the south fall,the north one fell 7 minutes later.)

  • what happens at 0:51... i looks like the building was changing it´s colour for a second.

  • so why arent you then ? funny to think theres been more action in europe over 9/11 than in the usa !

  • At 1:10 I can literally here Larry Silverstein yell "PULL IT" this is a conspiracy, Bush and Chaney did it, Sivlerstein profited, Isreal was behind it too!

  • Am I right that this building had been almost completely evacuated (following the frst aircraft crash) by the time the second aircraft crashed into it?

  • @BaumerPaulGefreiter Thats not entirely accurate.A survivor recalled his experience to me and said that after WTC1 was hit announcements were made over the tannoy system in WTC2 telling workers that their building was secure and to remain at their desks.This has since been verified by many others.Thankfully my friend (and many others) ignored the message and made their way downstairs to safety.

  • @cappucinokid100 Thank you for your reply. Though - to be honest - what you told me is quite sad and disturbing.

  • @cappucinokid100

    I am glad that some people ignored that! I got a hard question. Were there any floors unavailable in the wtc, like the floors of the impact zone? I really want to hear that from an actual survivor (or am i putting to much hay on my stick?)

  • @cappucinokid100

    here in OZ we had live feeds and yes they did tell the workers to go back to their desks..

  • @BaumerPaulGefreiter It is part of what happened at WTC2. It has been estimated that in the uppermost part of the building, basically from the 78th Floor Skylobby clear to the roof there were roughly 2,000 people at work in their offices, over half of whom worked for AON corp. There were different reactions which varied from company to company the most.

  • @BaumerPaulGefreiter Most people in that area of the South Tower ignored the messages and began to evacuate. At AON Corp, executive Eric Eisenberg began clearing the company's offices with a bullhorn and ushering the 1,100 AON employees down the stairs to the 78th floor, where they'd catch an elevator to the lobby. In the end, 924 of the employees there at the time escaped the tower safely. Eric Eisenberg was among 176 AON workers who died. They were on floors 92, 98-105

  • @BaumerPaulGefreiter In all, of those 2,000 people present in that area of the South Tower at the time of Flight 11's impact with the North Tower, it is estimated that 1,400 of them managed to evacuate safely. Of the 600 who did not escape, as many as 200 of them are believed to have been killed at the 78th floor skylobby, which was in the lower part of Flight 175's impact zone.

  • @BaumerPaulGefreiter nope wikipedia 'brian williams'

  • Crazy conspiracy theorists, the lot of you.

  • @C-ANWEBRING calling people names is a simple way of dismissing them. Instead you might want to look at why so many people do not believe that fire and gravity, after the plane impacts' brought down wtc 1 2 & 7.

    The North tower was only hit 13 floors from the roof..How could that tiny block destroy the rest below from gravity alone? there are 1100 people 'missing', gravity did that? and all that powdered everything/? and the iron spheres?. then there were the 100 day fires /watch?v=v3mudruFzNw

  • @cappucinokid100 It IS air resistance, one of the 20 survivors of the collapse felt a hurricane-like wind shooting through the stairwell while he was about 40 stories below. It shoots out of the building at the point of least resistance. That's why there were only like 3-4 squibs in the entire bottom section of the building.

  • What most people don't know, is that with the activation of the fire alarm, the building ventilation's shut down and fire damper doors closed automatically so as not to allow the fire to spread floor to floor. (chimney effect)

    So the "squibs" are NOT caused by pressure escaping from the collapse.

    The ejections are caused by explosive events on THAT FLOOR.

  • @motonegros its from the explosive events in my jeans

  • @jukodebu Whats that Juko? Did you shit in your pants again?

  • omg sqeeze air out of any container...the air needs someplace to go, therefore in this case it blows out the windows below as the pressure from on top of it increases. doesnt take einstein to know that....3rd grade science ffs geeez

  • @Barderella your theory goes out the window when you take into account that there were blasts 40 floors below the actual collapse.. maybe you should repeat the 3rd grade

  • @Barderella or get some glasses

  • could be the pressure from the elevators falling down because the top part of the building collapes or air and parts of th ebuilding falling trough that shaft

  • Shitty ass design.

  • ok. if it was an inside job then why did the part above the impact zone on the south tower tilt horizaontal when it collapsed? watch other videos. you will see people who say this was an inside job are retarted. the only inside job was building 7, larry silverstein told them to collapse it. why do you think it collapsed at 5pm? they had to set the charges. As soon as it happened the media was like "Oh my god! the terrorists brought it down!" it was so structually unsafe they had to do it.

  • @TheLuke1729 yea the south tower tips horizontally, sure does...now watch it tip again, and this time make sure to see how the portion of the building that tips off, disintegrates in mid air.

  • @TheLuke1729 well they had more access and much longer periods of time inside the trade centers with free reign to set up charges as well prior to 9/11...that info is out there if you look....i agree with you but dont you think that top section tilting would continue to move horizontally and remain somewhat in tact causing a huge section of building to be seen falling covering a huge area below?

  • The pancake theory. as a civil engineer, i dont believe the the inertia of the top floors starting down on the intact structure is enough to bring down a building in its own foot print as seen here. that is the force applied downward is not enough to cause collapse. secondly, i dont the destruction caused by a plane on one side of a building would cause it to evenly fall downward as seen here. what did cause this i dont know but the facts dont match story we were told, imho.

  • My old downtown east side apartment has a view of the WTC. That was the most emotionally painful day of my life. After watching coverage for hours on end I knew those were demolitions. I'm no conspiracy theorist but it seems obvious. The deal is that most people don't want to even entertain the thought that an American would do this to his own country, his own people. Yet we know about PINAC. We know that No Pearl Harbor = No US involvement in WWII. No attack on WTC = no killing Saddam Hussein.

  • @cappucinokid100 the tower is full of air and the elevator shafts release the air at the point of least resistance.

  • hard truth inside job

  • when the mass is as ignorant evil will always prevail.

  • if this was an inside job then why is no one doing anything about it why are we not rioting in the streets tomarrow or storming the white house demanding answears is it cause no one cares is it cause no one belives or is it because we just want to put it behind us and move on

  • @StephanieMcmahon69 People have been doing it for years. People are to close minded to accept the fact that there were explosives. Even my parents and Family, It was an inside job and someday people will realize that.

  • @cappucinokid100

    Also,these type hi rises have automatic dampers on the ventilation system designed to prevent the chimney effect during a fire.

    The floors were isolated from each other as soon as a fire was detected.

  • at 0:52 the north face blasts out a HUGE squib at least 30 floors below the "collapse". Nice video Cap, hope you are doing well, friend

  • @IranContraScumDid911 It's called an elevator. Perhaps you've heard of it?

  • @jll2904 You must have been inside the building with test instruments and have access to details the rest of the world does not ..... you have it all explained and figured out. Turns out science already tells us clearly with defined benchmarks and laws when unified and tested what happened here, it also tells me you are ignorqant and near-sighted lacking the capacity to even comprehend. For you a building turns to dust to grade in 10 seconds and you think it was a caveman. LOL, sleeper

  • @IranContraScumDid911 you know thats from the pressure right

  • @MrPoltergeist94 I know it is "pressure" from well placed explosives. You must be a little slow. If the towers failed to grade in high velocity ejecta and dust at near full gravitational acceleration into themselves then there is an energy conversion issue with your pressure tale. The ONLY energy you have is mass times gravity squared. Mass blows to dust without velocity loss? Where did you get your "pressure" to do that? The core was not crushed by your "pressure"? Can you recreate your claim?

  • @IranContraScumDid911 There was a fire fueld by 10k gallon of jet fuel. There is your explosion.

  • @KnivesOfTheRound The jet fuel made a huge explosion consuming much of the aerated fuel. Then the jet fuel magically does not consume or is used in th fire you claim was hot enough to phase change steel, saving itself for an hour so it can explode when the towers collapse? You are pure dumb. Think of the energy consumption, you have it being used three times in one event, all at its full capacity. Jet fuel does not work like that shitbird, the hotter the fire the faster the fuel is consumed

  • @IranContraScumDid911 Anyone with any education knows liquid jet fuel does not burn, the vapor does. And at that quantity, it takes a while. While you're on youtube, watch a few big scale gasoline explosions. Petrol burns at about the same rate, so you'll notice some similarities.

  • @cappucinokid100 I know, and this is just one of many.

  • Inside job.

  • That building was definitely a controlled demolition job.

  • @BambooFortress YOUR A FUCKING STUPID!!!!!!!!

  • all three buildings (1,2 and 7) all had comprehensive UTP public (tennant) networks on each floor. This is the perfect control mechanism for a large number of devices requiring remote control (IP). All you have to do is clear the floors and plug in where required, but how the hell would they do that in these busy buildings?

  • @srkh28

    It's been reported there was construction/maintenance work months before 9//11. These people could have done the job during these so called "construction work.

  • See the squibs? It is a no brainer and the ones that cannot see are brainless. Sheeple of America wake up!

  • @junglemike72 squibs are compressed air. 

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more