youve got a fuckin huge forehead hahaha, i wasnt too inthralled by that film but that review was still pointless you personally cant review a film that quickly so stop tryin ur not edgy or different ur jus shit!
Yep. Completely agree. This movie was luscious to look at, but overall, smoke and mirrors. I didn't really get to KNOW or CARE about the characters. There were a couple good moments. I liked when Daisy (around the age of 22) was showing off, and didn't ask him a thing about BB (thought that was an insightful bit about being young). And I liked the last scene with him as a baby. Other than that, pretty to look at, but the actors didn't do enough to redeem a mediocre screenplay. :(
wow, did you even watch the damn movie? every thing you said it "lacked" was most definitely in the story! And if you did watch the movie you sure as hell weren't paying attention
the guy doing the review is named matt pais (pronounced pace). i don't want to sound like a dick but maybe you should learn to read the description before you make a coment.
You Sir are a disgrace to Film Reviewers. Even though I have yet to see this film it is still evident that you know nothing about film reviewing? I mean, what Film Reviewing School for Film Reviewers did you go to? You give the rest of us a bad name.
Well, let's see, it's based on a book by F. Scott Fitzgerald. So, let's stop jumping on the writing of the film, you can dislike it all you like, but ultimately it was the writers, producers, and Fincher's decision to focus on the juxtaposition of Benjamin and Daisy's aging over the course of their lives, romantically. And don't you think that that juxtaposition does examine the benefits and detriments of aging both philosophically, emotionally, and physically?
Jesus Christ, does this guy like anything? I don't think I've seen him give a good review to any film this year, WTF! He also comes off like a sarcastic film school dropout.
how can i take a review seriously when i have no faith and respect in the interviewer by default?
the interviewer looks/sounds and even talks like a moron. just the way he says "will probably get a few votes in best makeup category" shows how moronic he is
One of my favorite movies!!!!! TEN PLUS
vangelis72xx 1 year ago
youve got a fuckin huge forehead hahaha, i wasnt too inthralled by that film but that review was still pointless you personally cant review a film that quickly so stop tryin ur not edgy or different ur jus shit!
alexdakidda 1 year ago
Yep. Completely agree. This movie was luscious to look at, but overall, smoke and mirrors. I didn't really get to KNOW or CARE about the characters. There were a couple good moments. I liked when Daisy (around the age of 22) was showing off, and didn't ask him a thing about BB (thought that was an insightful bit about being young). And I liked the last scene with him as a baby. Other than that, pretty to look at, but the actors didn't do enough to redeem a mediocre screenplay. :(
littlemissmeg13 2 years ago
wow, did you even watch the damn movie? every thing you said it "lacked" was most definitely in the story! And if you did watch the movie you sure as hell weren't paying attention
FlyinRyan1985 3 years ago
HE SUCK.....
thamas99 3 years ago
You say that it's a shame that it seems like it's a drawn-out love story, but that's exactly what it is. A love story.
You, sir, are horrible at reviewing films.
SanasSweetMode 3 years ago
Brad Pitt's performance was a bit lackluster, but it was a fantastic movie
Such a shame if some people can't relate to it
Shrubbs 3 years ago
Jesus. Did this guy even watch the movie he's reviewing?
bigtophalloween 3 years ago 2
Do you like any movies?
anonymousdictator 3 years ago
most of the proffesional movie reviewers are not supposed to like movies
videoner 3 years ago
layne
tranvucuong0604 3 years ago
learn how to spell fast-paced..
predsfan1291 3 years ago
the guy doing the review is named matt pais (pronounced pace). i don't want to sound like a dick but maybe you should learn to read the description before you make a coment.
slaytak 3 years ago
You Sir are a disgrace to Film Reviewers. Even though I have yet to see this film it is still evident that you know nothing about film reviewing? I mean, what Film Reviewing School for Film Reviewers did you go to? You give the rest of us a bad name.
Bad monkey, no cake for you!
Gyropitus 3 years ago
bad review - good movie
jahguy7 3 years ago 2
this guy thought he is roger ebert!
Quy4life 3 years ago 2
hey this movie kicked ass this guy probaly gave the dark knight two thumbs down. what an ass
theuberchub 3 years ago 2
This guy is an ass.
Benjamin Button was truly Awe Inspiring.
It's sad that reviewer has no soul and his opinion of this movie proves it
mainmedic 3 years ago 3
What's more disappointing? This movie critic believes he looks better as a penis head.
marcoschalesky 3 years ago 2
penis head...lol
RaulBaltazar21 3 years ago
Well, let's see, it's based on a book by F. Scott Fitzgerald. So, let's stop jumping on the writing of the film, you can dislike it all you like, but ultimately it was the writers, producers, and Fincher's decision to focus on the juxtaposition of Benjamin and Daisy's aging over the course of their lives, romantically. And don't you think that that juxtaposition does examine the benefits and detriments of aging both philosophically, emotionally, and physically?
echelonmaniac009 3 years ago
TL;DR - Matt Pais is overcritical and, frankly, a fairly bad critic.
echelonmaniac009 3 years ago
Jesus Christ, does this guy like anything? I don't think I've seen him give a good review to any film this year, WTF! He also comes off like a sarcastic film school dropout.
Xenda 3 years ago
how can i take a review seriously when i have no faith and respect in the interviewer by default?
the interviewer looks/sounds and even talks like a moron. just the way he says "will probably get a few votes in best makeup category" shows how moronic he is
utubeuser1839 3 years ago
hey stop reviewing movies!
its not for you
mattm08 3 years ago 2