For a 1 million dollars you can buy a Russian Mig or a variance of different supersonic aircraft's and de-weaponize them for civilian use. All military aircraft's are considered experimental anyway because they are not subject to the strict safety tests of the FAA or other international flight associations. People fail to realize thought that the initial purchase of a supersonic or jet aircraft is the least expensive part. Flight, maintenance and basic insurance costs are astronomical.
@Zeksteve actually, for sub sonic flight it was a great plane and one still exists. if it would have gone forward as a subsonic aircraft, there would be several hundred in use today. but it was under engineered for above. M.95. I had a deposit for two of the aircraft until it was canceled from lack of funds and the accidents.
@Zeksteve there is one in canada that sits in a private aircraft museum and is flight ready at any time and does fly regularly. the accidents all ocurred by shock vibrations during the "transonic" enveloped above mach .95 while attempting above mach 1 flight capabilities. there were no issues whatsoever in the mach .80-.90 range.
powerplants, the pw-j85 was a good choice. at mach .85, the aircraft has a range of 1100 nm at FL29 and only 60% power. at take off, it could climb at 10k+ fpm
@b101aa2 ah didnt know it happened at transonic, Just poor aerodynamics then, i know they had to strengthen the plane but doesnt matter how strong they make it if there is uneven and interopted compression on the leading edges.
How much did you expect to spend on this kit? The viperjet seems cool yet for 300k for a unassembled airframe and no avionics nor engine seems quite a rip off
@Zeksteve all up total with basic ifr package flight ready, the aircraft was suppose to cost about $1 million flat. which for jet aircraft new, that's pretty cheap.
even i agree, bad engineering went into materials for the shock waves encountered during transonic. if you notice the very thing rudder and elevator, that's where the break ups happened. ya.... simply needed to be much stronger and robust.
Sure, jim Bede is an awesome designer but he needed Burt Rutans help to finish this design Burt Rutan is just a better Designer. but Bede made homebuilts possible. it is still an awesome plane though!
@NiKoLKooki burt rutan is good too, but he was just 1 member of the bd-5 team. he didn't design the whole aircraft, just bits and piece and flight testing.
Creativity and lack of commitment and responsability lead to cases like this. BD-12 had the same bad fate. Mr. Jim Bede seems to me like the wrong guy with the right skills and talents. What a shame that most of his designs failed just because of lack of attention to crucial details.
sure, if allowed to be produced, every terrorist with a garage would have built one by now and loaded it with explosives and a map to the White House or nuclear plant. Some things aren't meant to be available to the public.
sure, if allowed to be produced, every terrorist with a garage would have built one by now and loaded it with explosives and a map to the White House or nuclear plant. Some things aren't meant to be available.
are you shitting me because they had one fatal crash that is the name of game when it comes to testing and designing aircraft although they could have put an eject seat in it lol. third world countries would have been eating them up. low cost, low maintenance, super sonic if barely but still not bad. they would have mounted weapon systems on them and found new ways of killing each other. especially with a price under one mill compared to a raptors 120 mill or the b-2 at 3.2 Billion
"According to the airplane's operating limitations, the accident airplane was limited to a maximum airspeed not to exceed 300 knots calibrated airspeed."
The accident pilot confirmed the MAYDAY and stated that, he was out of control and that he thought he "was disintegrating."- 6 minutes into his flight.
Go to a morgue and see what scraps your beloved & kin must identify as their loved one. Then grow the hell up.
Simple- it is a terrible idea. What form of exceptional stupidity allows novice and amateur pilots flying about in essentially cruise missiles?
Kinetic energy from impact alone would be enormous.
It is beyond the realm of the sane. USA allows too much freedom to fools & idiots who should otherwise be locked in insane asylums. The proverb is true- the USA truly is the asylum run by the lunatics- more dollars than sense [sic cents] . Gott in himmel sakrament!
@SignoroIncognito Really?! A terrible idea huh? So I guess we should stop NASCAR racing to huh? Maybee we should stop driving anything that goes faster than 50 MPH? The USA allows to much freedom?! It's obvious you are not an American Citizen, and if by some misfortune of fate you are, let me tell you something, This is what REAL AMERICANS dream of owning. If I could affoard one of these things, not only would I have one, but I would definately be improving them!!
Wow a single engined jet fighter with two vertical stabilizers? It's rare or should i say they dont exist(except the F-35). I wonder what advantages it may have over a single tail stabilizers! Since the project cost was around 1 million i think it wasn't all that technologically advanced even though i'm dying to see in action maybe in some poor country airforces!
I'm thinking of building an aircraft in my garage for a project. I know this sounds absurd, but planes are my passion. So do you guys know how a plane like this is designed so that its flight dynamics are reasonably sound and safe? And also, can you tell me how a plane is fabricated and constructed (i.e. what the frame should look like; how the sheet metal skin should be attached; etc.)?
Hi I was thinking about allmost the same projects but made by monumental modults in Carbon/kevlar technology. I'm trying to make 3D Carbon frames allmost the same like in bikes but not 2D... I dont think plane have to be as heavy as is right now.
Its not absurd dude Im a commercial pilot and an aviation junkie so I understand! but its all about research. Learn as much as you can I am also designing a homebuilt and now I just need the money :) Like Ted said either join the eaa and or go the the website and watch ALL the construction vids like I did you will learn alot. Also type in RV-10 construction in google and you can look at hundreds of sites were garage builders document every step of thier build with pictures.
@JDKMM7 Keep thinking, kid. I doubt you could build a decent remote-control boat, let alone a real plane. SHEESH! Did you get into mommy's pot? That's for cramps, son. Get your head outa your ass and get some experience building scale-model planes, first. Try something cheaper and safer and closer to the ground, like bicycles.
@2012listo No need to be a dick about it. Your profile says 41, I'd think a 41 year old would be a bit more mature than your post. So, in short, YOU get your head out of your ass and learn some common courtesy like a decent human being.
@Kriegsarschmann But dude, did you read what this kid wrote? C'mon, he's never built anything. NOTHING. Go check for yourself. And everyone needs to get their heads out. Say the alphabet backwards. See? Get your head out. Really. When you can say the alphabet back and forth, and swing it, you will have some proof of clarity and focus. Not until then. PROOF. And chicken.
unfortunetaly it isnt on market. you cant buy it. 3 of 5 prototype crashed and both which remain is unflyable. Thats Sad. If I had over 2 milions $ I would like to buy one.. The ' EM10 bielik ' is in the same cllas I think, but will had problems too.
Only 5 were built, including the prototype. Three were lost via in-flight breakups, killing their pilots. The other two are in museums, declared "unflyable".
Of course it would've, why do you think thorough wind tunnel tests are carried out over and over by any decent corportation before the designs are finalized?
Not to mention mechanical shear testing,
there are so many tests that need to be done before an aircraft should be allowed to fly.
That's why it's almost impossible to insure a test pilot, due to the inherently
They tried! With the Fox and Monitor Jets. But the market was too limited to justify the cost, and, after testing revealed many structural problems (resulting in 2 deaths) and poor performance, the project was cancelled.
@itsmonti1 well when it did break the sound barrier, proto 2, it broke up in flight. Better off redesigning a new airplane rather than one which is known to break up.
@itsmonti1 Techincally it is very possible to do so. However, money dictates what get's produced and what doesn't. Designing an aircraft is a very tough job, where you have to consider so much stuff you wouldn't even dream of (unless u got extensive knowledge about the aviation industry). You also have to get the plain certified, where you have to prove all sorts of stuff to the authorities. This process is sooo expensive, and it prevents alot of developement of new aircrafts.
From the Bedecorp website: "We are looking at a revised version of the BD-10 that would permit the use of the more modern, highly efficient fan engines. We also did a considerable amount of design work on the six place version of this aircraft. We have designated this aircraft the BD-11."
I have a friend whos father was a t38 instructor pilot in the USAF. He was looking at buying the kit for this airplane and flew in it in 94 and was impressed by its flying qualities. Later it suffured a fatal crash because of design problems and was srapped.
Jim Bede is jinxed, he might as well just give up. He robbed Peter to pay Paul during the BD-5 project, leaving all BD-5 customers to fend for themselves, engine-wise. Engines from Hondas, VWs and Subarus found their ways into many BD-5 kits since then. His other projects haven't fared well, neither. Snake-oil at its finest.
Wow, someone thumbed me down. I guess that means I'm right. Now now, Mr. Bede, no need to give me such negative critique, you can go back to selling cars now. It seemed to be your best game anyway, judging your personality and criminal history.
cpx- Yeah- I understand that it never has and was always intended as a ( High ) subsonic aircraft. But the title of the video, as many are Bede headers is misleading. I am 47 years old and I remember my dad (USAF retired and lic A&P)getting the first magazines and advertisements extolling the then new BD5- I also remember him saying "with that engine and Jim Bede- it will never work"
Homebuilt = you buy plans and/or a kit and assemble your aircraft. The kit can have all of the parts premanufactured so all you are doing is assembly... or it can essentially be a huge box of sticks or in the case of an all metal plane... stacks of sheet metal.
or it can be like a kr-2s and comes with a pamphlet, a couple of blocks of foam, a parts list, and some sticks that don't fit. built one 10 yrs ago. i had to order all the stuff from aircraft spruce & supply cause nothing that came with, worked. for 20k total, still can't beat it. lol
Frome the BedeCorp website: "We are looking at a revised version of the BD-10 that would permit the use of the more modern, highly efficient fan engines. We also did a considerable amount of design work on the six place version of this aircraft. We have designated this aircraft the BD-11." Any idea how recently that was posted, and if they actually are working on it (sometimes people forget to remove things from websites).
Bede is a talented guy with a horrific track record for delivering promised aircraft. I have been following him and his aircraft since 1980. While his planes pass the wow factor, he has failed to deliver anything in the homebuilt market other than terrific dreams. As for the BD-11, don't get your hopes up. I am still waiting for the BD-12 (a bd-5 with a certified engine . . .) Bede seems to always "run out of development money.
Don't know about solving the problems in a couple of days, but another attempt to build a jet under 1 million, won't happen. (see all prices on VLJ being built, all around 3 mil) I don't know about FAA certification of Cessna PP with 500 hours on a 172 getting permission to fly one, either. So cost for training, insurance, etc. grow and grow. BD made the James bond jet in Octopussy (or kit) and that never really took off, either, but keep trying!!!
the whole problem was the structural build aft the turtle back. it wasn't built to take transonic shockwaves. one with extensive engineering knowledge and understanding of aircraft construction could fix that easily enough in a short period of time. it didn't proceed forward because Jim Bede went bankrupt and had to sell the plane to a canadian company...
There are numerous companies that sell them, buy any avaition magazine and there will be advertisments in the back "Wings, Airpower, Air Classics,Flypast, etc. They are expensive however!!
i ate a coldcut sandwich today
blazterreck 2 days ago
For a 1 million dollars you can buy a Russian Mig or a variance of different supersonic aircraft's and de-weaponize them for civilian use. All military aircraft's are considered experimental anyway because they are not subject to the strict safety tests of the FAA or other international flight associations. People fail to realize thought that the initial purchase of a supersonic or jet aircraft is the least expensive part. Flight, maintenance and basic insurance costs are astronomical.
boarderboi69 2 months ago
Poor video. To much editing that shows zilch!
CMAenergy 3 months ago
to those who dont know this plane was a total POS death trap that was highly illconceived and under engineered
Zeksteve 3 months ago
@Zeksteve actually, for sub sonic flight it was a great plane and one still exists. if it would have gone forward as a subsonic aircraft, there would be several hundred in use today. but it was under engineered for above. M.95. I had a deposit for two of the aircraft until it was canceled from lack of funds and the accidents.
b101aa2 3 months ago
@b101aa2 none are flight worthy and out of the 5 planes 3 crashed from falling apart in the air.
So if you want a plane that has a 60% chance of falling apart this is the plane for you.
But you know what with todays technology this plane is possible, the VLJ power plants that are out today would be perfect for this plane,
Zeksteve 3 months ago
@Zeksteve there is one in canada that sits in a private aircraft museum and is flight ready at any time and does fly regularly. the accidents all ocurred by shock vibrations during the "transonic" enveloped above mach .95 while attempting above mach 1 flight capabilities. there were no issues whatsoever in the mach .80-.90 range.
powerplants, the pw-j85 was a good choice. at mach .85, the aircraft has a range of 1100 nm at FL29 and only 60% power. at take off, it could climb at 10k+ fpm
b101aa2 3 months ago
@b101aa2 ah didnt know it happened at transonic, Just poor aerodynamics then, i know they had to strengthen the plane but doesnt matter how strong they make it if there is uneven and interopted compression on the leading edges.
How much did you expect to spend on this kit? The viperjet seems cool yet for 300k for a unassembled airframe and no avionics nor engine seems quite a rip off
Zeksteve 3 months ago
@Zeksteve all up total with basic ifr package flight ready, the aircraft was suppose to cost about $1 million flat. which for jet aircraft new, that's pretty cheap.
even i agree, bad engineering went into materials for the shock waves encountered during transonic. if you notice the very thing rudder and elevator, that's where the break ups happened. ya.... simply needed to be much stronger and robust.
b101aa2 3 months ago
Black & white? Da-FuQ!?
azis1100 3 months ago
Looks like one of the F-16 prototypes.
Putepepsi 3 months ago
Sure, jim Bede is an awesome designer but he needed Burt Rutans help to finish this design Burt Rutan is just a better Designer. but Bede made homebuilts possible. it is still an awesome plane though!
NiKoLKooki 7 months ago
@NiKoLKooki burt rutan is good too, but he was just 1 member of the bd-5 team. he didn't design the whole aircraft, just bits and piece and flight testing.
b101aa2 7 months ago
Holy fuck is this video from the 1800's?
CRFbadass 7 months ago
Imagine the pussy this would get you?
GangsterHutterite 8 months ago
What license do you need for this? Is just a Private Pilot Licence good enough?
IkTheNew 8 months ago
@IkTheNew you would need a type rating...but this aircraft is no longer available
64wing 5 months ago
rip test pilot
Ibringthetruth1 8 months ago
Why not all aluminum?
Ibringthetruth1 8 months ago
dear santa...
HaDaBoiZ 8 months ago
You mean sub sonic plane...
tinolino58 10 months ago
Good shooting target For MILITARY. MILITARY WILL BUY A LOT THIS PLANE FOR SHOOTING TARGET EXPERIMENT NAVY.
MafiaGENGTEAM1970 10 months ago
8 people were rejected by the FAA
jack90720 11 months ago
Dunno about dominating, but goddamn I'd love to have one. Too bad none are still flying.
AmericanAviator 11 months ago
The design looks a lot like a non stealthy F-35.
vfIskullangel 11 months ago
Creativity and lack of commitment and responsability lead to cases like this. BD-12 had the same bad fate. Mr. Jim Bede seems to me like the wrong guy with the right skills and talents. What a shame that most of his designs failed just because of lack of attention to crucial details.
vinamais 1 year ago
whats the cheapest helicopter/airplane avalible for personal use? im poor
20stevieray 1 year ago
@20stevieray the paper airplane
ADOPTmeBITCH 1 year ago
nice engineering..
KIBProductionz 1 year ago
sure, if allowed to be produced, every terrorist with a garage would have built one by now and loaded it with explosives and a map to the White House or nuclear plant. Some things aren't meant to be available to the public.
bobsakamanos 1 year ago
sure, if allowed to be produced, every terrorist with a garage would have built one by now and loaded it with explosives and a map to the White House or nuclear plant. Some things aren't meant to be available.
bobsakamanos 1 year ago
are you shitting me because they had one fatal crash that is the name of game when it comes to testing and designing aircraft although they could have put an eject seat in it lol. third world countries would have been eating them up. low cost, low maintenance, super sonic if barely but still not bad. they would have mounted weapon systems on them and found new ways of killing each other. especially with a price under one mill compared to a raptors 120 mill or the b-2 at 3.2 Billion
iceman27406 1 year ago
I return to defecate on this tomfoolery.
I quote from the NTSB on LAX 03LA092:
"According to the airplane's operating limitations, the accident airplane was limited to a maximum airspeed not to exceed 300 knots calibrated airspeed."
The accident pilot confirmed the MAYDAY and stated that, he was out of control and that he thought he "was disintegrating."- 6 minutes into his flight.
Go to a morgue and see what scraps your beloved & kin must identify as their loved one. Then grow the hell up.
SignoroIncognito 1 year ago
Why won't someone pick up the R&D?
Simple- it is a terrible idea. What form of exceptional stupidity allows novice and amateur pilots flying about in essentially cruise missiles?
Kinetic energy from impact alone would be enormous.
It is beyond the realm of the sane. USA allows too much freedom to fools & idiots who should otherwise be locked in insane asylums. The proverb is true- the USA truly is the asylum run by the lunatics- more dollars than sense [sic cents] . Gott in himmel sakrament!
SignoroIncognito 1 year ago
@SignoroIncognito Really?! A terrible idea huh? So I guess we should stop NASCAR racing to huh? Maybee we should stop driving anything that goes faster than 50 MPH? The USA allows to much freedom?! It's obvious you are not an American Citizen, and if by some misfortune of fate you are, let me tell you something, This is what REAL AMERICANS dream of owning. If I could affoard one of these things, not only would I have one, but I would definately be improving them!!
P54cause 1 year ago
Wow a single engined jet fighter with two vertical stabilizers? It's rare or should i say they dont exist(except the F-35). I wonder what advantages it may have over a single tail stabilizers! Since the project cost was around 1 million i think it wasn't all that technologically advanced even though i'm dying to see in action maybe in some poor country airforces!
powerson90 1 year ago
Give some canards, thrust vectoring, and 1:1 thrust to weight ratio :D
mobius1aic 1 year ago
i cant watch these too often.. makes me want something ill never afford hahaha
worldtravel101 1 year ago
Hey freaks! Mee too, I just love them aircraft!
thefencejumperengine 1 year ago
I'm thinking of building an aircraft in my garage for a project. I know this sounds absurd, but planes are my passion. So do you guys know how a plane like this is designed so that its flight dynamics are reasonably sound and safe? And also, can you tell me how a plane is fabricated and constructed (i.e. what the frame should look like; how the sheet metal skin should be attached; etc.)?
Any little help would be appreciated.
JDK
JDKMM7 2 years ago
Hi I was thinking about allmost the same projects but made by monumental modults in Carbon/kevlar technology. I'm trying to make 3D Carbon frames allmost the same like in bikes but not 2D... I dont think plane have to be as heavy as is right now.
ALIOSZACAPONE 2 years ago
@JDKMM7 Join the local EAA,learn before you try to build
ted850760 2 years ago
Its not absurd dude Im a commercial pilot and an aviation junkie so I understand! but its all about research. Learn as much as you can I am also designing a homebuilt and now I just need the money :) Like Ted said either join the eaa and or go the the website and watch ALL the construction vids like I did you will learn alot. Also type in RV-10 construction in google and you can look at hundreds of sites were garage builders document every step of thier build with pictures.
cobrala 2 years ago
@JDKMM7 Keep thinking, kid. I doubt you could build a decent remote-control boat, let alone a real plane. SHEESH! Did you get into mommy's pot? That's for cramps, son. Get your head outa your ass and get some experience building scale-model planes, first. Try something cheaper and safer and closer to the ground, like bicycles.
2012listo 1 year ago
@2012listo No need to be a dick about it. Your profile says 41, I'd think a 41 year old would be a bit more mature than your post. So, in short, YOU get your head out of your ass and learn some common courtesy like a decent human being.
Kriegsarschmann 1 year ago
@Kriegsarschmann But dude, did you read what this kid wrote? C'mon, he's never built anything. NOTHING. Go check for yourself. And everyone needs to get their heads out. Say the alphabet backwards. See? Get your head out. Really. When you can say the alphabet back and forth, and swing it, you will have some proof of clarity and focus. Not until then. PROOF. And chicken.
2012listo 1 year ago
unfortunetaly it isnt on market. you cant buy it. 3 of 5 prototype crashed and both which remain is unflyable. Thats Sad. If I had over 2 milions $ I would like to buy one.. The ' EM10 bielik ' is in the same cllas I think, but will had problems too.
MMApolish 2 years ago
Only 5 were built, including the prototype. Three were lost via in-flight breakups, killing their pilots. The other two are in museums, declared "unflyable".
crl15 2 years ago
That's why wind tunnel testing is so important.
loveunderlaw 2 years ago
The problems wouldn't have been revealed in a wind tunnel. They were structural.
crl15 2 years ago
Of course it would've, why do you think thorough wind tunnel tests are carried out over and over by any decent corportation before the designs are finalized?
Not to mention mechanical shear testing,
there are so many tests that need to be done before an aircraft should be allowed to fly.
That's why it's almost impossible to insure a test pilot, due to the inherently
high risk of death from improperly
designed or tested airplanes.
loveunderlaw 2 years ago
why can't a new company pick up the research & development and make one today?
itsmonti1 2 years ago 7
They tried! With the Fox and Monitor Jets. But the market was too limited to justify the cost, and, after testing revealed many structural problems (resulting in 2 deaths) and poor performance, the project was cancelled.
cia212 2 years ago
Oh really? Two deaths! That is terrible.
itsmonti1 2 years ago
@itsmonti1 well when it did break the sound barrier, proto 2, it broke up in flight. Better off redesigning a new airplane rather than one which is known to break up.
d0rkiishchris 1 year ago
@itsmonti1 Techincally it is very possible to do so. However, money dictates what get's produced and what doesn't. Designing an aircraft is a very tough job, where you have to consider so much stuff you wouldn't even dream of (unless u got extensive knowledge about the aviation industry). You also have to get the plain certified, where you have to prove all sorts of stuff to the authorities. This process is sooo expensive, and it prevents alot of developement of new aircrafts.
Nazrahnas 1 year ago
"Very very solid..." ....NOPE!
kudynski 2 years ago
It's too bad they were not able to figure out the issues with this aircraft. It would be nice to have one on time share.
TaurusCanser 2 years ago
Mom, Dad, I want one for this christmas!!!
itsmonti1 2 years ago
@itsmonti1 Dream
TarikuKunn 2 years ago
i want one.
philskelton1 2 years ago
I want to buy one !
19BlackLord91 2 years ago
@19BlackLord91
I have found one for sale it costs 499.999 dollars, unfortunately its probably the last one remaining so its expensive.
dalisson55 2 years ago
From the Bedecorp website: "We are looking at a revised version of the BD-10 that would permit the use of the more modern, highly efficient fan engines. We also did a considerable amount of design work on the six place version of this aircraft. We have designated this aircraft the BD-11."
dragonlord1973 2 years ago
I have a friend whos father was a t38 instructor pilot in the USAF. He was looking at buying the kit for this airplane and flew in it in 94 and was impressed by its flying qualities. Later it suffured a fatal crash because of design problems and was srapped.
kingair81r 2 years ago
Comparing it to the Viper Jet Mk 2. I'd be sending my order there way. The Viper is something else.
Goingdowntosouthpark 2 years ago
this is a decade before the viper was even a concept yet. cheers
b101aa2 2 years ago
Comment removed
Goingdowntosouthpark 2 years ago
Well they should put a few more video's up on here and have a jet off.
Goingdowntosouthpark 2 years ago
@b101aa2 looks like the brits T-6 trainer
iceman27406 1 year ago
I don't think Civil Air Patrol would be able to have one of these.
C/SSgt Payton
JesseSPayton 2 years ago
Jim Bede is jinxed, he might as well just give up. He robbed Peter to pay Paul during the BD-5 project, leaving all BD-5 customers to fend for themselves, engine-wise. Engines from Hondas, VWs and Subarus found their ways into many BD-5 kits since then. His other projects haven't fared well, neither. Snake-oil at its finest.
SenorSpode 2 years ago
I agree Jim Bede was and as far as I know is still the best snake oil salesman. Didn't he try to do something with a futuristic car
atpcfi 2 years ago
Wow, someone thumbed me down. I guess that means I'm right. Now now, Mr. Bede, no need to give me such negative critique, you can go back to selling cars now. It seemed to be your best game anyway, judging your personality and criminal history.
SenorSpode 2 years ago
Man my Civil Air Patrol squadron could have really loved to get on of those. :P Oh well.
C/Amn Kim
lordazn 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You kids in the CAP stick to your Cessnas. We'll stick to the jets.
1LT. Bryant 71st FTW Vance AFB
Pkm188 2 years ago
T-T no need to rub it in pl0x
lordazn 2 years ago 5
Really nice pilot attitude.... :x
djground 2 years ago 2
they should manufacture a bd-5 with towo seats a little bigger, then i would save for it xD
brucenash 3 years ago
Want...
craigharridge 3 years ago
So when exactly has it ever gone SUPERSONIC?
sbd45acp 3 years ago
nope, from what i read it went 0.84(?) of it. subsonic.
structurally the material or something would disintegrate when it went high speeds.
pity, this craft has a lot of potential if fixed up now.
cpxjds07 3 years ago
cpx- Yeah- I understand that it never has and was always intended as a ( High ) subsonic aircraft. But the title of the video, as many are Bede headers is misleading. I am 47 years old and I remember my dad (USAF retired and lic A&P)getting the first magazines and advertisements extolling the then new BD5- I also remember him saying "with that engine and Jim Bede- it will never work"
sbd45acp 3 years ago
Well considering it was made of 60% 2024-T3 aluminum that is understandable... Basically a flying Coke can.
Prometheus203 2 years ago
how much??
NOOBONABIGSTICK 3 years ago
bd-10's were to cost a bit under $1 million total.
b101aa2 3 years ago
it looks like a mini fulcrum
iotbs6 3 years ago
or, a BD aircraft. lol
b101aa2 3 years ago
I have one doubt: what's a HOMEBUILT jet?
agix467 3 years ago
Homebuilt = you buy plans and/or a kit and assemble your aircraft. The kit can have all of the parts premanufactured so all you are doing is assembly... or it can essentially be a huge box of sticks or in the case of an all metal plane... stacks of sheet metal.
fhhuber 3 years ago 2
or it can be like a kr-2s and comes with a pamphlet, a couple of blocks of foam, a parts list, and some sticks that don't fit. built one 10 yrs ago. i had to order all the stuff from aircraft spruce & supply cause nothing that came with, worked. for 20k total, still can't beat it. lol
b101aa2 3 years ago
is there any way to stream line the canapee to remove the hump or bump.
msjr777 3 years ago
also what does it cost as a kit.and all parts come with it but the engine.
msjr777 3 years ago
Frome the BedeCorp website: "We are looking at a revised version of the BD-10 that would permit the use of the more modern, highly efficient fan engines. We also did a considerable amount of design work on the six place version of this aircraft. We have designated this aircraft the BD-11." Any idea how recently that was posted, and if they actually are working on it (sometimes people forget to remove things from websites).
Paragon19 3 years ago
has to be out dated, because the bd-17 prop aircraft was 2000. That one looked about like a kr-2s but a little wider fuse.
b101aa2 3 years ago
Bede is a talented guy with a horrific track record for delivering promised aircraft. I have been following him and his aircraft since 1980. While his planes pass the wow factor, he has failed to deliver anything in the homebuilt market other than terrific dreams. As for the BD-11, don't get your hopes up. I am still waiting for the BD-12 (a bd-5 with a certified engine . . .) Bede seems to always "run out of development money.
danielfindling 3 years ago
Don't know about solving the problems in a couple of days, but another attempt to build a jet under 1 million, won't happen. (see all prices on VLJ being built, all around 3 mil) I don't know about FAA certification of Cessna PP with 500 hours on a 172 getting permission to fly one, either. So cost for training, insurance, etc. grow and grow. BD made the James bond jet in Octopussy (or kit) and that never really took off, either, but keep trying!!!
usmctanks1 3 years ago
the whole problem was the structural build aft the turtle back. it wasn't built to take transonic shockwaves. one with extensive engineering knowledge and understanding of aircraft construction could fix that easily enough in a short period of time. it didn't proceed forward because Jim Bede went bankrupt and had to sell the plane to a canadian company...
b101aa2 3 years ago
I just want to buy the jetpilot helmet. Where can I get one?
madfury 3 years ago
There are numerous companies that sell them, buy any avaition magazine and there will be advertisments in the back "Wings, Airpower, Air Classics,Flypast, etc. They are expensive however!!
usmctanks1 3 years ago
Whatever became of the Potez-Heinkel CM-191B?
That ship seated four, used less power too.
whizbang47 3 years ago
hey i,ll be glad if any 1 can tell me frm i can get da kit to make dis or any catelog to make dis or related to home built jet planes
akifmafia 3 years ago
bd-micro dot com makes the bd-5J
seguse 3 years ago
where can you get the kits to make this
signig44 3 years ago
viper-aircraft dot com
seguse 3 years ago
where can you get the kits to make this
signig44 3 years ago