2010 search predictions

[agapitoflores001]

This was realized and it was very effective.

[championsjuniorfied]

my DAD knows Matt Cutts [:

[TechieGeek1]

I'd like to see Google looking for higher quality content to rank higher and not just sites with authority. I mean, my competitor sites have been around for 10+ years and my site is only a year old. They have 10,000x the content I have, but my service isn't any worse than theirs.

[PropellerBusted]

0:59

"Dicking around in the real-time stream."

[GoogleWebmasterHelp]

@PropellerBusted Just to clarify, Matt said "... *digging* around in the real-time stream." :)

[PropellerBusted]

@GoogleWebmasterHelp

I knew that, I couldn't resist though! My sense of humoUr is that of an elementary school student. ^____^

[seoexperttv]

I like that real-time search and site hacking are the predictions for 2010, but it does seem a bit passe in scheme of things. I was hoping to hear more about social integration, FriendConnect prominence, mobile search, local search community enhancement (ORM), or possibly some type of human authentication using biometrics to get help get human-supported site scoring that supports non-logged in user search results. Still good stuff - thanks for sharing!

[sayweb]

very clear, good. Congratulations

[tattoos01]

That's a very good point you make about people taking the wrong path, will be competing against people (and maybe organizations?) who are doing illegal things.

You could then assume, for them to be successful on that path, they would also need to resort to illegal things.

Cheers

James

[jesperthegreat]

I don't get the whole real time thing. Why would I want to run a real time search when I am searching for facts? Aren't the contents composite with regards to my search query more important than what happened just there and then?

I REALLY like that you're going to work on your interface. Especially if you're looking to work with social search. I think ASK had a good visual expression a couple of years back. :)

[thomasnmza]

@jesperthegreat What if one "fact" is that the thing you're searching for just happened?

If I search for Tiger Woods 1 minute after that story broke, yeah I'd want to see facts about Tiger Woods, but I'd also want to see the very latest stream of Tiger Woods data, in many cases.

[jesperthegreat]

Well, I always thought that was what Google News was all about. :)

[jezwebb]

@jesperthegreat I think this relates to the idea that the internet is going to overtake TV as the major provider of content, and so that content needs to be up to date. No one needs yesterday's news.

[jesperthegreat]

@jezwebb - absolutely! However, it is not that we want to exchange accuracy with real time. We want to have what we want, when we want. There is still a lot to learn from search phrases and sequential search patterns that could return better search results to me as a user.

In the end I think it is all about presentation and interface design though. Someone out there will come up with a fancy solution that takes aim at solving the majority of the searchers needs.

[khmohsin]

yes I agree, I think google is stressing too much on real time nowadays

[palisandr123]

this s a great channel

[zeezat1]

As you stated, Real time thing is something very hard to combine with relevant search results, I reckon. Real life example is Twitter, when you search for something on Twitter and you will get tons of results but nothing match you with what you search for. I think Google could make a big different in that sense. Still experiments and beta are always give the platform to come up with real innovation. Looking forward for 2010 Google! ;)

[m0r1arty]

Still like the short hair - but I gotta say.

Until you guise get copied content and cheapt SEO linking from Wordpress, Joomla + Drupal out the way there's a flood of stuff coming which makes it really hard for us genuine content deliverers to work on the same scale.

Just a thought - but a biggun'

-m0r