From my perspective, the Hancock whistle, being quasi-omnidirectional, is very useful for coordinating with brakemen and flagmen during switching maneuvers; the horn is more effective underway on the high iron, approaching yards, grade crossings, way stations, &c.
If Hancock 4700s and 4710s were discontinued because they were not loud enough, then how come NH used them extensively, but NH was a relatively safe railroad? Also, in the first shot, we see an FL9 racing towards us at 60 or so mph, but yet we can all hear the whistle clearly and rather loudly.
@nyc3001 there are now uniform standards for the dB levels required for horns. hancock's don't meet them.. i want to say there was another issue, however i'm nowhere near qualified to even try to say what it was..
@nyc3001 I would say they just didn't fit the rest of their fleet. And Hancock couldn't lobby them to buy more, being out of business. There were no orders for years. Remember: Tax the railroads, and build airports, waterways and highways with the money! Trains have to pay their way, no one else does. But that's ok! So you end up with little or no rail service.
From my perspective, the Hancock whistle, being quasi-omnidirectional, is very useful for coordinating with brakemen and flagmen during switching maneuvers; the horn is more effective underway on the high iron, approaching yards, grade crossings, way stations, &c.
bcschmerker 4 months ago
Nice horn on that first turbo set.
PereMarquette1223 4 months ago
AWESOME!!!
dwkcamman611 5 months ago
Wierd... a whistle on a diesel locomotive? Well, if it works.
LNERMallard 7 months ago
NICE
SuperNJTRANSIT 7 months ago
it requires 2 FL9's for 5 coaches?
LS6Z28 8 months ago
@LS6Z28 no it just makes it go faster
djmarco121 6 months ago
Funky horn on that first unit 0:11. Anyone know the make of that horn? Thanx fur sharin'!
VilquinProductions 1 year ago
Hancock Air Whistle
TrainGuy18 5 months ago
Thanks you, Videos very nice,
vladimir2366fa 1 year ago
If Hancock 4700s and 4710s were discontinued because they were not loud enough, then how come NH used them extensively, but NH was a relatively safe railroad? Also, in the first shot, we see an FL9 racing towards us at 60 or so mph, but yet we can all hear the whistle clearly and rather loudly.
nyc3001 1 year ago
@nyc3001 there are now uniform standards for the dB levels required for horns. hancock's don't meet them.. i want to say there was another issue, however i'm nowhere near qualified to even try to say what it was..
notalott 1 year ago
@nyc3001 PM of Michigan also used them and the M&NS of Minneasota.
intercityrailpal 11 months ago
@nyc3001 I would say they just didn't fit the rest of their fleet. And Hancock couldn't lobby them to buy more, being out of business. There were no orders for years. Remember: Tax the railroads, and build airports, waterways and highways with the money! Trains have to pay their way, no one else does. But that's ok! So you end up with little or no rail service.
intercityrailpal 11 months ago
Comment removed
nyc3001 1 year ago
I always wondered how those things sounded at speed. Awesome catch. I would've loved to live there during the 90s.
ronthecyborg 2 years ago
@ronthecyborg The 1960's were better!
intercityrailpal 11 months ago
When is this from, summer of 1989 or something?
dragonpullman 2 years ago
yeah either 89 or 90
davidmagill1 2 years ago
You got it all here, Hancock air whistles, a Turbo and nice 567 sounds. Great.
nyshortline 2 years ago 2