@GSlice37 You just divide by the X coefficient, which in your example is 1. So you divide by 1 and the number remains unchanged. In other words, you don't need to divide by A when the the number before X^2 is 1.
I am not a math person but when I saw the end result of that completing the square, I have tears in my eyes and I've never been this excited ever over math!! Thank you Sal!!
Not sure how you managed to get paid for this, but I think it's cool that you manage to let people pay for downloading it! I know of some teachers who might be helped by your videos.
i did the same proof by leaving the a on the left and dividing later. it was not the same format but when i plugged in numbers it worked. shows the versatility of math.
I know I've said this before, but you're like the most awesome person on this planet. For days I've been scratching my head, frowning, pouting, yelling at my notes and monitor, even came close to tears (well, almost came close to thinking I was gonna cry) because I really wanted to understand the concept behind the quadratic formula and it just didn't register in my puny little brain. By 7:03 my heart raced and I got this stupid grin on my face because...I FINALLY GET IT!
I think something is wrong in 4:16 when adding the two factors the denominator has to be 4.A^3 (A cube,not squared) ,and the numerator has to be -4.A^2.C+B (not -4AC)...Someone corects me if I am wrong
@alitou001 No bro you dont always have to multiply them together to get a common denominator. If you have 1/3 + 1/6, you dont have to multiply 6 and 3 to get a common denominator, you just have to multiply the 1/3 by 2/2 so the denominator would = 6. I hope I answered your question.
"I hope you found that vaguely interesting..." I found it extremely helpful as well as interesting, needed it for a question set by school. Found the same solution on Google, but having someone talk you through it helped me understand everything step by step. THANKS A MILLION!!!
This video seriously made me chub a little bit. I tried proving the quadratic equation before but I had it set up all wrong. Thank you for this, it was fantastic. I'm sending this to facebook.
I get it fully until the 2:00 minute mark, ugh I really wish I were smarter in math. I know (like all algebra students) easily how to use the formulas, however I get genuinely interested in the axioms that the proofs come from, but it appears that my brain is not built to understand this and never will. Thank you for posting the video nonetheless.
Lol as soon as I seen all of this starting to turn into the quadratic equation I was beginning to get turned on. I was just like “Oh wow, there it is lol”.
hey umm well i mean i was really getting the yellow part at first and then wen it came to the orange and red part it got confusing...can u show more work?? thanx :D or maybe u can help me how did u get the b over 2a squared?
@Fishy1021 Do you get the orange part at the bottom? Well, the only way you can get the yellow part (thanks to khanacadamy for color coding this), to look like that orange part so you can break it down into (x+a)^2, is to add some term to both sides, which is completely legal since you are not necessarilly changing the equation (subtract one term from one side from the other and they will cancel). It's a beautiful trick, and it helps a lot.
@C3P0meetsData No, you can derive all kinematic equations without ever using this. If you want proof, just ask me, I can do it for you. It's actually quite simple when you see them worked out.
Nicely done. Now I can post a link to your proof, since you essentially said what I was said in class this morning (although you used nicer looking colors than I did!).
Because every positive number x has two square roots. One of them is , positive square root of x, which is positive, and the other , negative square root of x, which is negative.
It is part of the equation when it is put into a square root. You get two answer, one positive, and one negative. However, instead of writing out two problems they just put +/- . This is why the quadratic formula is written: x = -b +/- the square root of ... b squared - 4ac divided by 2a. Hope that this helped.
oye gracias . yo no tenia idea para que me servia la tecnica de acompletar cuadrados y mira aqui lo tengo. gracias me ayudo a saber de donde salia la formula de la ecuacion cuadratica
But WHY is gay an insult where you come from? I'm not gay, but so what if I was? I don't see how some people preferring the same sex detriments you in any way. Stop trolling and go outside or something. It's hard for me to imagine that people like this on the internet actually exist somewhere...
but why do you have to divide everything by A? everyone says they just like to or you should but why? why do you have to have a leading coefficient of one? can it work if i don't divide everything by A in the beginning?
To derive the quadratic formula from ax^2 + bx + c it is necessary to complete the square, and this becomes a whole lot easier when you're talking simply (x + y)^2. Imagine trying to factorise 947x^2 + bx = -c into a perfect square man. You would fry your brain, so why not simply divide by 947, making your work roughly 947 times easier.
MathMagician....!!!!!
MsComputerMind 3 weeks ago
You should go and try to solve one of those all time unsolved mathematical problems!
saleall 3 weeks ago
ty
jiaju11 4 weeks ago
I would never have been able to notice that they both were actually similar to each other :o My mind....my mind.
DThorn619 1 month ago
I love hot girls.
Tmanski1 2 months ago
I enjoyed solving this along with you
colin28mac 2 months ago
@colin28mac no homo right?
akukak 2 months ago
@colin28mac no homo right?
akukak 2 months ago
THANKS!!!! this has helped me soooo much!!!! :))
marissaandmarissaful 2 months ago
life saving video
RollTideTyler117 2 months ago
Super awesome.
LaborHours 3 months ago
This guy is Jesus! I love you Mr Khan!
tangiblephoton 3 months ago
I find this hard to master bait to
JBOYZ14 4 months ago
Thanks mate you cleared up so many questions for me. Great Work!
apwilsa 4 months ago
get on khans level
gautamv8 5 months ago 3
What if i start off with just x^ 2? I can't divide.
GSlice37 5 months ago
@GSlice37 You just divide by the X coefficient, which in your example is 1. So you divide by 1 and the number remains unchanged. In other words, you don't need to divide by A when the the number before X^2 is 1.
0ElectricWizard 5 months ago
At 2:45, why did you only work with the coefficient & not the variable of (B over A)x ?
timskeezy07 5 months ago
3 people's quadratic equations have non-real roots
justanambulance 7 months ago
This is beautiful.
ShakkIsLife 8 months ago
If i get an A i'll like this video again.
RnRPwN 9 months ago
I am not a math person but when I saw the end result of that completing the square, I have tears in my eyes and I've never been this excited ever over math!! Thank you Sal!!
BloomBlossom 9 months ago
thanks
paulceltics 9 months ago
is he doing this all with a mouse ?!
douchbag26 10 months ago
@douchbag26 nah pen on screen
MasterXXChief 9 months ago
I found myself yelling -4AC!!! extremely loud when i noticed where you were going with it xD
midgeamoo 1 year ago 3
Thanks man, I wondered how they came up with that formula... I think everyone should know how it's derived.
berkshireshows 1 year ago
thank you so much for posting this video...great!
tamdingonpo 1 year ago
Not sure how you managed to get paid for this, but I think it's cool that you manage to let people pay for downloading it! I know of some teachers who might be helped by your videos.
j4she 1 year ago
sooooooooooooooo simple
princefagwad 1 year ago
you rock my socks
TheFurryFeline 1 year ago
I learned this in algebra II. This is not hard to do. I just use the quadratic formula to solve the shit I need to rather than doing all of the work.
CrosbySucksDicks1 1 year ago
nice proof
roflcopter2225 1 year ago
i love your videos. you can teach math much easier and faster than any of my teachers i had in school until now :D
ShinyRayquaza 1 year ago
thank-you! this helped me so much on my Test!
ILuvLatias 1 year ago
i did the same proof by leaving the a on the left and dividing later. it was not the same format but when i plugged in numbers it worked. shows the versatility of math.
moocat11 1 year ago
This Video Helped me soooooo much!
Thanks! DON'T Ever Stop teaching!
nvidia116 1 year ago
tyvm genius
dajakesta1234 1 year ago
lmao! i knew you were gona use green, moslty cuz i wanted green =D
hobomnky 1 year ago
@hobomnky haha exactly the same thing for me. i just knew he was gonna use green, not sure how.
talaamu 1 year ago
@hobomnky same thing here >< i knew he was gonna use green somehow, but i have no idea how i knew it.
talaamu 1 year ago
I know I've said this before, but you're like the most awesome person on this planet. For days I've been scratching my head, frowning, pouting, yelling at my notes and monitor, even came close to tears (well, almost came close to thinking I was gonna cry) because I really wanted to understand the concept behind the quadratic formula and it just didn't register in my puny little brain. By 7:03 my heart raced and I got this stupid grin on my face because...I FINALLY GET IT!
Bless you Sal.
OuttaEgypt 1 year ago
I think something is wrong in 4:16 when adding the two factors the denominator has to be 4.A^3 (A cube,not squared) ,and the numerator has to be -4.A^2.C+B (not -4AC)...Someone corects me if I am wrong
alitou001 1 year ago
@alitou001 you're wrong. later when you square root both sides. 4A^3 would not end up being 2A. the denominator has to be 2A
enienileg 1 year ago
@alitou001 No bro you dont always have to multiply them together to get a common denominator. If you have 1/3 + 1/6, you dont have to multiply 6 and 3 to get a common denominator, you just have to multiply the 1/3 by 2/2 so the denominator would = 6. I hope I answered your question.
Roids1991 1 year ago
Woohoo! Now I see why it works!
josenros 1 year ago
Nice!!
MrJayblaze23 1 year ago
"I hope you found that vaguely interesting..." I found it extremely helpful as well as interesting, needed it for a question set by school. Found the same solution on Google, but having someone talk you through it helped me understand everything step by step. THANKS A MILLION!!!
solidcancer 1 year ago
This video seriously made me chub a little bit. I tried proving the quadratic equation before but I had it set up all wrong. Thank you for this, it was fantastic. I'm sending this to facebook.
oexnorth 1 year ago
I get it fully until the 2:00 minute mark, ugh I really wish I were smarter in math. I know (like all algebra students) easily how to use the formulas, however I get genuinely interested in the axioms that the proofs come from, but it appears that my brain is not built to understand this and never will. Thank you for posting the video nonetheless.
MidnightSundowns 1 year ago
That was like magic.
ninjajesus81 1 year ago
great easy to follow proof of something we usually just try to memorize...but we can see that you never have to memorize anything in math!!
SpoiledLogic 1 year ago
Lol as soon as I seen all of this starting to turn into the quadratic equation I was beginning to get turned on. I was just like “Oh wow, there it is lol”.
MarvelsofaLifetime 1 year ago
Solves for "x"
MasterThief1324 1 year ago
i kinda got lost at the completing the square thing, but the rest is kinda cool!
wavey61 1 year ago
hey umm well i mean i was really getting the yellow part at first and then wen it came to the orange and red part it got confusing...can u show more work?? thanx :D or maybe u can help me how did u get the b over 2a squared?
Fishy1021 1 year ago
@Fishy1021 Do you get the orange part at the bottom? Well, the only way you can get the yellow part (thanks to khanacadamy for color coding this), to look like that orange part so you can break it down into (x+a)^2, is to add some term to both sides, which is completely legal since you are not necessarilly changing the equation (subtract one term from one side from the other and they will cancel). It's a beautiful trick, and it helps a lot.
oexnorth 1 year ago
Does this in any way have some connection with Kinnematic equations in physics? (I can't spell)
C3P0meetsData 1 year ago
@C3P0meetsData No, you can derive all kinematic equations without ever using this. If you want proof, just ask me, I can do it for you. It's actually quite simple when you see them worked out.
oexnorth 1 year ago
This was intimidating at first but I went over the equation and watched the video a second time and I understand. :3 Teehee.
84sprinter 1 year ago
Nicely done. Now I can post a link to your proof, since you essentially said what I was said in class this morning (although you used nicer looking colors than I did!).
djnechodom 2 years ago
the last part was so touching *sobb*, thx btw 5/5
Archamber560 2 years ago
thanks =v)
EvanYM 2 years ago
this is some good stuff
guerchr 2 years ago
cool never thought about it that way. great video.
Mejiera12 2 years ago
thanks!
22admire 2 years ago
i do not get what he is saying from 5:58 to 6:23. someone explain, please? what determines whether there is a +/- provision?
idster7 2 years ago
Because every positive number x has two square roots. One of them is , positive square root of x, which is positive, and the other , negative square root of x, which is negative.
cherryberrie 2 years ago
It is part of the equation when it is put into a square root. You get two answer, one positive, and one negative. However, instead of writing out two problems they just put +/- . This is why the quadratic formula is written: x = -b +/- the square root of ... b squared - 4ac divided by 2a. Hope that this helped.
dadwa12 1 year ago
@dadwa12 Yup, you can view it as factoring out the whole square root mess. You know what you're talking about.
oexnorth 1 year ago
i could've sworn i heard the rocky theme during the last minute of this presentation.
idster7 2 years ago
THX man u helped me a lot!
TorasBulba 2 years ago
that was great ^THX!
ThelemicLaboratory 2 years ago
The end of this was fun
DeflocculatedDentist 2 years ago
oye gracias . yo no tenia idea para que me servia la tecnica de acompletar cuadrados y mira aqui lo tengo. gracias me ayudo a saber de donde salia la formula de la ecuacion cuadratica
protosis100 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
gay
7648508 2 years ago
math doesn't have a sexual orientation
:p
DeflocculatedDentist 2 years ago 19
This has been flagged as spam show
your gay
GAY BOY
go do the um in the wrong end
7648508 2 years ago
Is being gay a bad thing or something? Do you really have nothing better to do right now?
DeflocculatedDentist 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
you really don't take a hint.
GAY IS AN INSULT WHERE I COME FROM!!!!!
i know your a homo (your picture says it all)
but man do play retarded.
7648508 2 years ago
But WHY is gay an insult where you come from? I'm not gay, but so what if I was? I don't see how some people preferring the same sex detriments you in any way. Stop trolling and go outside or something. It's hard for me to imagine that people like this on the internet actually exist somewhere...
DeflocculatedDentist 2 years ago
@DeflocculatedDentist actually, math is bi. it screws everyone.
idster7 2 years ago
@idster7
Hi,
minus x minus = plus.
plus x plus = plus.
ex. -4 x -4 = +16 and +4 x +4 = +16
If x squared = 16 then x could be -4 or +4
Therefore, x equals plus or minus the square root of 16
Hope this helps. Regards, PD
Penndennis 2 years ago
This is a fantastic video! Thank you so much for posting it, it really helped me with my maths homework. :D
htkvngr 2 years ago 11
Thanks!
duyu 2 years ago
Brilliant, as usual.
myselfable1 2 years ago
Thank you very much for posting this video
ZaaaHuuu 2 years ago
Thanks for the lecture, I liked it!
TheRealBravie 2 years ago
after seeing ur videos i feel a lot smarter 10 to 100 mins then 1-100 days worth maths teaching in school......thank you
AnimeMangaKing 2 years ago
but why do you have to divide everything by A? everyone says they just like to or you should but why? why do you have to have a leading coefficient of one? can it work if i don't divide everything by A in the beginning?
clemdaughter 2 years ago
The purpose of the quadratic formula is to find the value of x that makes y=0 for any values of a, b, and c.
jorgio375 2 years ago
To derive the quadratic formula from ax^2 + bx + c it is necessary to complete the square, and this becomes a whole lot easier when you're talking simply (x + y)^2. Imagine trying to factorise 947x^2 + bx = -c into a perfect square man. You would fry your brain, so why not simply divide by 947, making your work roughly 947 times easier.
DarkReignie 2 years ago 2
cause if you dont divide everything by t=ine same term you alter the equation..
its like saying.. 4x+2= 8.. you know 4 has a half..
so what would you have if you divided only 4 by 2 would be.. 2x+2= 8..
which would change dramatically the answer leaving x= 3... what you can do i s divide all terms by 2 which would be 2x+1=4.---> x=3/2
comparing to our original formula: 4x+2=8 ---> x=3/2
clallovi 2 years ago
I feel more educated from watching one video of yours than sitting through a whole week in my math class.
marcusjhung 2 years ago
Excelent Sal! you made the proof very easy, when my teacher made this proof, I think he didn't know what he was doing
Greetings from México
LuisF201 2 years ago
Is there a formula for cubic equations or 3rd degree polynomials? Dare i say 4th degree O_O
mechwarreir2 2 years ago
Yes. They are nightmares. The fourth is just terrible.
jorgio375 2 years ago
I'd like to see the cubic and quartic formula (by the way, quartic is 4th degree).
mechwarreir2 2 years ago
interesting - i always wondered how to derive the quadratic formula
CuberChris 2 years ago
Math is beautiful. Thank you.
tagginos 2 years ago
Thank you, i always been wondering how we got the quadratic formula
trujro0119 2 years ago
You are a math God
Stupifiedman 2 years ago 2
AMAZING VID! .... ah i feel like such a nerd, i actually got excited when i saw how u did the last couple of steps haha
enoughtimeto69 2 years ago
thank you thank you thank you!!! i will now pass my math test becuase of this!!!! thank you!!!
nilesgirl95 2 years ago
I'm going back to school after 20 years to teach math and LOVED this video. Your use of colors was perfect.
kriskkramer 2 years ago
you are the frekin BEST, i SWEAR.
Eeedzy 2 years ago
umm interesting!!
i didnt get the steps right but interesting!!...
23davidbeckham07 2 years ago
thx a lot ;)
nejtilsvampe 2 years ago
Thanks for taking the time to do this. It really helps.
Winsunn307 2 years ago
nice and all but...one thing..please dont speak too fast o.o
hacksign000 2 years ago
somewhat got lost when u were algebraing but got the gist of it
Killap101 2 years ago
gud explanation but i jus dont get it ..
i got the yello i got the orange but ?red?
i dnt get y u did tht
xNikic 3 years ago
got lost on the pink,
think ill be watchin this a few times
majorkeybaree 3 years ago
bravo
i need a brain transplant . . .
GreenCures 3 years ago
Could have name the Properties you used in each step.
Great Vids, Thanks.
Snakez19 3 years ago
awesome!
peroxideh2o2 3 years ago
Wow, you really helped me to understand this.
THANK YOU.
viewerlikeyouare 3 years ago
Hey Presto !!! Like magic. Well done
hipbas 3 years ago
very interesting thanks well done
stanurban319 3 years ago
Fair play, i had no clue what you was talking about .. but fair play you know your stuff
and i watched it all the way through, ya managed to keep me interested even though i have no clue what it was about :D
demon424 3 years ago
One of the best videos of seen thus far.
initialg 3 years ago
I've*))
initialg 3 years ago
By the way, very intuitive vid :)
GoldAK47 3 years ago
The only way you can solve cubic functions is by doing Algebraic long division and stuff right?
GoldAK47 3 years ago
Plz can you post more completing the square questions, (like X^3+5x+89), not the perfect square, the odd ones. Thank you
Waranle 3 years ago
nice
shiv86 3 years ago