@PMDGpilot737 why should i think about it ? all i see they are both planes and fly great but if this a thing bout them aircraft being russian then i see where your hate comes from , my question to you is have you ever fly both planes to compare the difference ? ( and i'm not talking bout flight simulator )
@Damienm7 No Russian aircraft are good especially Ilyushin.
They both are fly by wire controlled. But airbus made it better. More fuel efficient A340-300 range is 13,700 km IL96 is with max payload is 11,500 km and with max fuel is 13,500 km.
@PMDGpilot737 the day that anyone make an aircraft that's not flamable then i would say better or near perfect any aircraft these days that falls off from the sky will most likely blow in millions of pieces .
@PMDGpilot737 With what knowledge can you say that no russian aircraft are good?? You are most likely just a little kid,that sit in ALL day playing FS because you have no friends to serve your bullcrap to.. the Il-96 is a very good aircraft with NO fatalaties at all. It flies beautifully,and handles great! A340 more fuelefficient? You are wrong about the distances. il96 can with max fuel fly 15000 km and is powered with P&W PW2000,and A340-300 can fly 13700km.
" @Damienm7 No Russian aircraft are good especially Ilyushin.
They both are fly by wire controlled. But airbus made it better. More fuel efficient A340-300 range is 13,700 km IL96 is with max payload is 11,500 km and with max fuel is 13,500 km.
THEY made it better!"
Where do I say that Russian aircrafts suck?
Okay I'm wrong about the IL-96 distance I only copied from wikipedia wrong or right I don't care.
I will delete the comment as it looks like to disturb people.
@PMDGpilot737 to quote you: No Russian aircraft are good especially Ilyushin.
In my eyes thats the same as saying they suck! Russians build strong solid machines! You can see it on the Il-96,Tu204/214 and Antonov An148.. Sukhoi Superjet 100... Im positive,that alot of western airlines are missing out on something not ordering this GREAT aircrafts!
It's all politics and deals under the table. Even in civilian aviation lots of airlines are given certain "benefits" from buying certain planes. Since the mere idea that an European airline would use Ilyushin or Tupolevs (which would have perfect safety records if maintained by professional airlines which don't skip service) makes European manafacturers cringe, things are already settled beforehand.
Look what the Detroit auto industry has been getting away with these last 3 decades.
@KushPizzaSleep There are many design similarities between the two planes, the nose section is virtually identical and the il-86 isn't that much bigger than the A300. The only reason it uses 4 engines is because the Russians couldn't and still can't develop an engine powerful enough to rival the West. The il-86 could cope just fine with two modern Western turbofans
I like Ilyushin planes but I hate Tupolev planes!
luilory 1 month ago
Comment removed
luilory 1 month ago
Nice landing.. And what a nice plane it is..
SuradjJ1 2 months ago
an124 in the back :P
85LARGE 3 months ago
My Dream.
RamyOwnz 6 months ago
wow spectacular video,it was amazing,thanks for uploading kind regards from US florida.
racerxxy 7 months ago
Fire truck standing at the ready for russian a/c 1:20
gonetoworkbbackin5mi 7 months ago
Krasavits!
aghilesk 8 months ago
Tired of all the same page rage ads
MCSparki1 8 months ago
How ordinary.
lukebccb 8 months ago
так здорово
BlackmanTheJock 8 months ago
That's a gorgeous livery.
BDKR 8 months ago
Comment removed
gonetoworkbbackin5mi 8 months ago
ist das in Leipzig??
TippingError 9 months ago
Don't talk a bout copy, because all airplane have the same basic shapes. We can not build fuselage like rectangle ; square ; triangle ...
vandeso 9 months ago
This is Il-96 t- cargo-jet
Ottonturk 10 months ago
@Russia2010 ummm..? I dont hate russia and im not a yankee. by looking at your name you look like a Stalins asswiper.
PMDGpilot737 1 year ago 2
Судя по длинне, это Ил-86
3a4ucTkaToMck 1 year ago
@3a4ucTkaToMck Это Ил-96-400 удлиненная модификация базового Ил-96
FlowerCrownOfPoppy 1 year ago
nice landing like the four engines; safer!
lffit 1 year ago 12
yeah t5hat´s LEJ!!!
my home home and favourite airport...great to go spotting!!!
nice video!
I really like and enjoy tupolev1442 vids!
musicman95si 1 year ago
One dirty bird....Hope they still have "parts" for future upkeep...
oneofthemdeals 1 year ago
Saw that plane in Hannover, still awesome!
planeMOVIES 1 year ago
my favorite. u rocks. i love airplanes 4eva!
Xamydumasfan4everX 1 year ago
nice :)
JackDooner 1 year ago
It s better than 340
Andreas7773 1 year ago
Comment removed
PMDGpilot737 1 year ago
@PMDGpilot737 this plane existed way before the A340 , airbus copied them .
Damienm7 1 year ago
@Damienm7 Airbus made it better.
PMDGpilot737 1 year ago
@PMDGpilot737 better how ??
Damienm7 1 year ago
@Damienm7 Think about it.
PMDGpilot737 1 year ago
@PMDGpilot737 why should i think about it ? all i see they are both planes and fly great but if this a thing bout them aircraft being russian then i see where your hate comes from , my question to you is have you ever fly both planes to compare the difference ? ( and i'm not talking bout flight simulator )
Damienm7 1 year ago
@Damienm7 No Russian aircraft are good especially Ilyushin.
They both are fly by wire controlled. But airbus made it better. More fuel efficient A340-300 range is 13,700 km IL96 is with max payload is 11,500 km and with max fuel is 13,500 km.
THEY made it better!
PMDGpilot737 1 year ago
@PMDGpilot737 the day that anyone make an aircraft that's not flamable then i would say better or near perfect any aircraft these days that falls off from the sky will most likely blow in millions of pieces .
Damienm7 1 year ago
@PMDGpilot737 With what knowledge can you say that no russian aircraft are good?? You are most likely just a little kid,that sit in ALL day playing FS because you have no friends to serve your bullcrap to.. the Il-96 is a very good aircraft with NO fatalaties at all. It flies beautifully,and handles great! A340 more fuelefficient? You are wrong about the distances. il96 can with max fuel fly 15000 km and is powered with P&W PW2000,and A340-300 can fly 13700km.
ollo1982 9 months ago
@ollo1982
" @Damienm7 No Russian aircraft are good especially Ilyushin.
They both are fly by wire controlled. But airbus made it better. More fuel efficient A340-300 range is 13,700 km IL96 is with max payload is 11,500 km and with max fuel is 13,500 km.
THEY made it better!"
Where do I say that Russian aircrafts suck?
Okay I'm wrong about the IL-96 distance I only copied from wikipedia wrong or right I don't care.
I will delete the comment as it looks like to disturb people.
PMDGpilot737 9 months ago
@PMDGpilot737 to quote you: No Russian aircraft are good especially Ilyushin.
In my eyes thats the same as saying they suck! Russians build strong solid machines! You can see it on the Il-96,Tu204/214 and Antonov An148.. Sukhoi Superjet 100... Im positive,that alot of western airlines are missing out on something not ordering this GREAT aircrafts!
ollo1982 9 months ago
@ollo1982
It's all politics and deals under the table. Even in civilian aviation lots of airlines are given certain "benefits" from buying certain planes. Since the mere idea that an European airline would use Ilyushin or Tupolevs (which would have perfect safety records if maintained by professional airlines which don't skip service) makes European manafacturers cringe, things are already settled beforehand.
Look what the Detroit auto industry has been getting away with these last 3 decades.
McLarenMercedes 8 months ago
@Damienm7 when was the IL-96 development?
wr1830 1 year ago
@PMDGpilot737 more like an A330, but this was around way before then.
ExportAli 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ExportAli Airbusmade it better.
PMDGpilot737 1 year ago
@PMDGpilot737 But the II-96 is based on the IL-86 which came way before the a340 you idiot
KushPizzaSleep 1 year ago 29
This has been flagged as spam show
@KushPizzaSleep We werent talking about that aircraft...
PMDGpilot737 1 year ago
@KushPizzaSleep Yes but the IL-86 is clearly based on the Airbus A300
aspiringdrummer17 1 year ago
@aspiringdrummer17 lol no its not how can you compare a 4 engine plane to a smaller twin?
KushPizzaSleep 1 year ago
@KushPizzaSleep There are many design similarities between the two planes, the nose section is virtually identical and the il-86 isn't that much bigger than the A300. The only reason it uses 4 engines is because the Russians couldn't and still can't develop an engine powerful enough to rival the West. The il-86 could cope just fine with two modern Western turbofans
aspiringdrummer17 1 year ago
@aspiringdrummer17 Yeah but some IL-96 uses RR engines!!!!!!!
Kambanicity 10 months ago
@Kambanicity No they use PW engines on one variant of the il-96. You must be thinking of the Tupolev Tu-204 because some of them use RR engines
aspiringdrummer17 10 months ago
@KushPizzaSleep the Il96 was before the A340 aswell...i love people who say this is a copy of the A340 lol
j4cko56 1 year ago
@KushPizzaSleep We weren't talking about the IL-86,
PMDGpilot737 10 months ago
@KushPizzaSleep what do you expect from an armchair pilot
jonathan97s 5 months ago
@KushPizzaSleep Calm down you fucktard.
meccaturbo 5 months ago
@PMDGpilot737 u are stupid if u think that
Kambanicity 10 months ago
Why have you copy his Video ? :S
DusSpotter96 1 year ago
its a pregnant a 340
applmac2009 1 year ago
@applmac2009 basically
guy014 1 year ago
@guy014 two decks
crayz745 1 year ago
good landing, although i wouldnt like to be there when it takes off, bad things can happen xD
BringEllisTheHoriZon 1 year ago
It looks like a plane that has all the major commercial aircraft merged into 1
thefsxflyer 1 year ago