WTC1 North Tower Demolition Analysis - Shake and Smoke

[cheerdiver]

SOPA is out to take this down.

[Cuttermuscle]

It definatly went down.

[74pbg]

@911veritas There was a big ground shaking prior collapse (look very closely) as the picture shake an man was falling from the tower (right side 108 floor) you can see it better zoomed in other videos from this angle! If this was a demo, i don't know, but i know what i heard this day, 3 big explosions right before the north tower collapse and guess what? You can't hear it it in ANY VIDEO except one shot from Jersey and you can still heard this explosions! This is very suspicious i my eyes!

[MERCURHILLMANIAC]

bombs man it was fuckin bombs!!!

[MrDoverben22]

Yes, its all a lie, bring on the paitriot act, than it will be right as rain...Promblem solved, Book them good danno, thoses cock sucking towell heads...But, has any of these towell heads been accredted for 911 yet...F.B.I. says no, not a enougth evedince....What a joke...

[CUZIIN]

0:41 u can see smoke bloom top right hand corner of the building before the collapse

[METEKHAN31]

this yellow stuff looks like thermite

[wikichris]

What evidence would a believer require to counter this evidence? Would a video of some shaking on a tripoded camera with no explosives be ok?

[attiliojoseph]

ok for those morons who dont believe the evidence of explosives ,,,,, look at what happened in Beijing recently when a steel building burned for so long ...and guess what ? no melted steel at all ! and many floors were burning for hours on end ....no like the few minutes of burning that occurred on the towers . . end of story numb nuts

[wikichris]

Cameras on high zoom pick up every vibration. I had my video camera on a tripod in my lounge yesterday and it shook just like that without touching it at one point - does that mean some explosives went off somewhere nearby? The steel building in Beijing - was a plane laiden with fuel involved?

[flatl1n3]

There was no molten steel found at WTC. The unique design of WTC 1,2 and 7 caused their collapse not bombs.

[lowaces]

another governemnt agent hard at work

[MrDoverben22]

@lowaces Less i missed my guess, i would say agents are working overtime, maybe on tripple pay its hard yakka blowing up buildings and in this vid and other vids explosions where clearly heard. Heaps of witnesses on that day also heard explosions..

[lowaces]

@MrDoverben22

the govt agents are the debunkers who troll youtube maintaining the govts story

[MrDoverben22]

I totally agree with what you say, i have suspected some y-tube dudes who come accross as experts and they type all night and day, hey, how come they are able to do this, no sleep and no job to go to..T1 and T2 fell like they where made out of sand and steel beams look like lolly pop sticks ejecting from blds and N.I.S.T. wants us to believe it was gravity that did this...

[lowaces]

@MrDoverben22

another thing you can do with the govt agents is go back to the posting months latter and they'll still be there spouting the official story, they like to pick on new people and gang up on people but for all we know they could all be one person, and they HATE it when you tell them you knew someone who died in the WTC and just want to get them some justice, they HATE that !

[MrDoverben22]

IT worked a treat, debunker says he worked at ground zero and that gov. had nothing to do with 911 attacks and gov. dose not tell lies. Well Judge Alvin Hellerstein ruled that the air was toxic and that the E.P.A. LIED. Hey, the epa is the government, nixon set this mob up 1970.....Cheers

[fizmath]

@flatl1n3

molten steel was found a month later in the debris.

Try again

[sagent616]

You can see video evidence and photo evidence of molten metal. Do some research and you will see that.

[JSSTyger]

I think I am going to end all doubt the government was involved right now

google bin laden video duke professor

Case closed folks. There can be no other explanation, after you see this page, that the govt had foreknowledge.

[Nonphixion2]

Actually.. Vanda3138 is right. Captivemrhanky it is pretty blatant that you are either getting paid to do this or you are just in denial. My name is Bob Smith. what is your real name? It may not have been george bush who was at fault for this. But he sure is taking the blame isn't he? hmmmm. hmm. hmm.

[DarthKazi]

Consider this. You have a 100 legged table all made of steel. You take out 20% of those legs. Light some fires in random spots under the table. Get a bunch of your friends to stand on the table... bounce around, jump, do whatever you want. Do you think the table will suddenly fail, collapsing to the ground, or do you think there would be a slow, bending action that occurs?

To assume that removal of less than 20% of the columns on the impact floors and office fires caused that is nuts.

[sovereign777]

Its simply the camera being touched or the tripod wobbling as the camera person walks around behind it. There needs to be testament from the actual camera person that they felt the building shake - where can this be found??. The antenna simply leans away from the camera, the towers collapse initiated on the opposite side and the top of the building leaned. This is visible on video taken from the other side.

[captivemrhanky]

I love how everyone says "IT'S A CONSPIRACY!!!" While I do not believe that there was a bomb of any type, I must say this. If there was one, why did it have to be the federal government? ANSWER THAT. HOW THE HELL DO YOU KNOW TERRORISTS DIDN'T PLANT IT!?

[N1TEMAR3187]

who are the terroritst??? we are dummy!!

[vanda3138]

If there were bombs in the building the real question should be: Why is the government preventing a real investigation from taking place? How did al-Qaeda actually get the bombs into the building in the first place? If you cant answer these two questions then it is more than fair to say that the some elemnst of US government was complicit in bringing the buildings down via controlled demoltion, as clearly observed in this video

[captivemrhanky]

But there were no bombs that I know of.

[vanda3138]

Using the principal of logical deduction you can see that bombs were indeed used to bring the buildings down. If bombs were not used, then how did it free-fall all the way to the ground? The burden of proof is on you to prove that no bombs were used.

[captivemrhanky]

The principal of logical deduction? Using the principal of logical deduction, I deduct that you are one crazy person, who can't accept the truth that no bombs were used. How did they "free-fall" If you are referring to how they pancaked, building are designed to fall straight down when some type of major structural damage takes place. This is so they do not fall to the side and take out other buildings. I won't baby you. Do actual research yourself.

[vanda3138]

You are obviously in a state of serious denial. Perhaps a government apologist or even worse. Just look at the buildings and the way they were simply destroyed in front of your very eyes. This will be my final response to your objection. Good luck in finding the truth

[captivemrhanky]

You sir, are the one in denial, and sitting behind your computer writing up conspiracy reports. You have yet to give me any evidence that I could not contradict with FACTS.

[JSSTyger]

This video is evidence the official story is WRONG. The seismic spike timing was fixed and reported as in sync with the debris hitting the ground. Just ask Columbia University. So much for your conclusion there is no evidence...

[JSSTyger]

WTF. Buildings aren't designed with collapsing in mind. Your assertion is the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard. They are designed to PREVENT collapse. And get real...lets not mistake the Pancake theory as a physical law....after all the pancake theory seems only to apply to the wtc buildings.

[captivemrhanky]

Shows how much your know. Building are built to prevent collapse, yes. But in the event of a collapse, the buildings are built so they don't fall to one side or the other. They are designed to fall straight down.

[JSSTyger]

Who cares. They shouldn't have fallen anyways. Besides. If buildings were designed to fall straight down why do we bother with controlled demolitions. Heck all we need to do is light a match and throw the kerosene in the right spots...that would save loads of money. Buildings are designed to carry load and resist loads...which has not a freakin thing to do with collapsing straight down.

[Aanthanur]

comapre this

watch?v=QpghEHXpsQo

watch?v=QtVl8mOTRq4

some indications of a Controlled Demolition.

[hypnotoad25]

Why the fuck should FEDERAL AGENTS state that they believe there were explosives if it's the GOVERNMENT that did all that???

[Aanthanur]

its only a small group inside the goverments agencys that did this. most ppl never would take part in such a conspiracy.

[gofastandwynn]

Then why hasen't one of them ran off to the Washington Post saying "They did this and I was the one aganist it" ore done any sort of leak?

And why would they attack the financial sector since it would be paying their taxes that would be paying for the war this was a pretext for?

[Aanthanur]

Read about Sibel Edmonds and her whistle blower network

[jelleoelle]

This video only shows that there were NO explosions.

[cheerdiver]

@jelleoelle This vid shows a p-wave, which can not be heard by the human ear, <10hz. Find out what type of detonation generates p-waves. Witnesses (on vid @GZ) attest to vibrations "like a subway car".

Find out why the less damaged tower fell 1st. View controlled building demos, the timing is perfect.

The increased smoke it volumes of air being displaced from the single underground detonation.

Visual failure occurred at weakest point on the outside support columns.

[chucksheen]

After the camera shakes point your attention to the smoke coming out of the top of the tower and you will notice it start to pour out. The 47 column overdesigned superstructure is virtually indestructable. My theory so far is that the core was taken out to allow the building to warp/bend/twist and fall. Facts cry out for theories, theories have their place, the official conspiracy theory has "low chance of probability" (NIST). Spread the word NOW!

[chucksheen]

Ron Paul Quote

RonPaulTV dot com

"...But I think we have to keep pushing for it. And like you and others, we see the investigations that have been done so far as more or less cover-up and no real explanation of what went on."

[chucksheen]

AE911Truth d0t 0rg

PatriotsQuestion911 d0t c0m

4 ton steel girders thrown 600' into Wintergarden and thousands of bones as small as 1/16", 1 person ~200 pieces, top of Deutsche Bank, not from gravitational collapse sorry.

Checkout some of the recent debates on 911Blogger d0t c0m, do a search.

Stand up for peace, liberty, justice and The Charters of Freedom.

[InTheSticks1881]

All this poses serious suspicion. Never before discovering You Tube would I have questioned the events. It is simply overwhelming. And no, I do not believe in UFOs.

I hope you all will consider Ron Paul, that presidential candidate. Although he does not believe it was conspiracy, he also doesn't likely spend time on the net looking at You Tube videos. I can say however, that he does not however trust the CIA, and would like to get rid of it.

[IQchallenged]

If you look on internet for "bomb-sniffing dogs reacted as if they had detected explosives." in google, you will find articles referring to a NY Police Officer arresting 5 Israels that had been reported to be filming the first crash. There are many unanswered questions.

[Iconoclast421]

regardless of whether the fire was hot enough (it wasnt but lets just say it was for the sake of argument) how does that explain the explosion and cloud of white smoke at the base of the tower, as well as this footage, just seconds before collapse? It is blatantly obvious that this explosion and shaking is what actually initiated the collapse. So where did this explosion come from?

[ozdezsez]

why cannot the PEOPLE be entitled (if they so wish) to view the footage of filght 77 impacting the pentagon.

YOU ARE NOT A PRIVATE COMPANY

you are democratically elected representatives (dreaming i know)

but maybe things can change - arghh just maybe

[ozdezsez]

each of the 4 planes has a flight recorder &

a cockpit voice recorder (indestructable).

we get to hear/translate (macabre as it is) maybe 1/4 of the total.

[snegirek]

on video of 9\11 i see the top of building (above fire) is moving down without any outward sign in a half second before collapse. explain me please how did they do that with explosive. do you believe that whole building was mine-strewn from top to ground? and its not falling down but result of chain explosion? dont you?

[Paid2DoThis]

Anyone who refuses to believe that 9/11 is an inside job : Read the 9/11 commision report, and compare it with all the video's, pictures, documents, ... there is on the internet. Not in a million years the report makes sense to what you see. OPEN YOUR EYES and accept the truth.

[capelipl]

the truth of the 911 event is plain for anyone with

the courage and detachment necessary for such a monsterous crime to be understood . sadly most people are superficial thinkers, and cowardly to boot.

911 truth is the last act of patriotism left to

americans in these dark times of governments desperate acts- murder , discord , war ,theft and treason

[sutadi1970]

yes I agree, most people are too lazy to look up and delve into what is our generations'jfk, they beleive in popular mechanics debunk fairy tales, but in the end that's what they wanna hear, they are cowards and complicit in the murder of 3000 people in the us and 1 million Iraqis, there is more waiting for us, the bastards arent finished yet, they want a police state forever!

[capelipl]

the truth of the 911 event is plain for anyone with

the courage and detachment necessary for such a monsterous crime to be understood . sadly most people are superficial thinkers, and cowardly to boot.

911 truth is the last act of patriotism left to

americans in these dark times of governments desperate acts- murder , discord , war ,theft and treason

[capelipl]

the cia and the mossad tend to cause alot of explosions too

[DarthKazi]

Ohhhh, it's OK to believe the eye witnesses who saw planes flying towards the Pentagon (as long as their account matches the gov's), but we can't believe ANY of the eyewitnesses, or firefighters (many of which have attended building demolitions) when it comes to a point of view that defies the government's fairy tale.

Yeah... when the heat's on, just claim; "You MUST be mistaken".

You assholes.

[DarthKazi]

debunking911 can't explain mechanical collisions producing 60 micron powder. Neither can you, or any other mechanical, structural or civil engineer. In fact, it's physically IMPOSSIBLE to crush concrete into that kind of powder without explosive energies... since, none of the particles within concrete are anywhere near that small.

[sickgreg]

It's that simple

[DarthKazi]

Why does fuel need to be compressed to explode, Einstein? Jet fuel and ESPECIALLY office fire cannot rapidly pulverize concrete into 60 micron powder... in fact, NO mechanical collisions can cause that.

58,000 tons crushing 450,000 tons into oblivion with only gravity to help it = bullshit.

[capelipl]

great comment and correct

[zgadgets]

was that video camera on a tripod or attached to a building, does anyone know. There are no security cameras facing the twin towers

[BCJ1985]

The exploding Jet fuel not only heated the building but no matter how long it burned for (whether it burned up straight away or not ), the jel fuel would have ignited other materials inside the building thus keeping the fire burning. Nobody in their right mind could claim the steel melted BUT the temperatures were hot enough to weeken the steel, allowing it to bend much more easily. Bear in mind that the essential load bearing core had been wiped out, transferring the load onto the exterior.

[Evans661]

The top falls about 10 feet BEFORE the part where the plane impact falls, the steel was seperated.

[Evans661]

Wow...

You dumb people.

The jet fuel would have been consumed in around 2-3 minutes, and it would not melt steel.

Fires twice as hot as at the wtc would have melted steel, the fires were insufficent to cause a collapse of that kind FULL STOP.

[hotrodderz]

building falls at hit area not antena plus hot fire can melt steel