Also, Ridley has become more of a joke to all Americans with his eccentric singing and passive extremist propaganda than a serious leader. Good job, Ridley...way to rack up the arrests withojut accomplishing a God damned thing.
When the Freestate project began, I was a member. They have become a group of activists turned extremist and I have been embarrassed by their bullish stupidity to the point of cutting ALL ties with them. This guy is another "victimless crime" douche that threatens all societies. This person paints a terrible picture of the Freestate movement. . The Freestate Movement is now full of weak, uneducated, and disrespectful sheep...many of which I can personally attest have criminal backgrounds.
Why are you people going to court and admitting guilt time and time again? Why don't you just say I have been driving for x amount of years and by the fact that my license have been renewed x amount of time the state has showed that they find no fault in the way I operated my car. I am a safe driver, as indicated by my record. I was driving safely on the date in question. I was involved in no accidents before or after I was impeded by the officer.
@mrrodneyalong I request that the court have the equipment the officer was using tested by an Independent lab in which I am allowed to witness the testing. I also request the logs records and any other papers that track the general maintenance and repairs for the equipment used on the day in question in the attempt to witness my speed. I also ask for a copy of the officers certification on the equipment in question.
@mrrodneyalong ask the officer directly if there has ever been a malfunction of the equipment- ask speciftly if it has ever gave a speed reading when no cars were traveling towards or away from the unit. Ask him if it is not true that the unit will sometimes show a speed when no cars are around. Ask if he knows that the equipment is not 100% accurate. Ask if it is possible that the equipment malfunctioned at anytime that day or any other day.Then ask if they ever require maintenance.
Wow this guy is just a douche. It's pretty easy to show that you don't give a shit about authority, but there are protocols in court which you have to follow and talking down to a judge is just plain stupid. I wish he'd have been found in contempt of court.
My opinion is this; if you operate your vehicle without paying for you tabs or dl, you are stealing from me and the state. If you break the traffic law even if you harm none you should be charged. Even though you put the cop in some danger. I bet you hold to the same theory as some civil libertarian do no harm no charge. Someone should use your family as target practice not actually hurt them mind you just come close to it. See if you hold the that bull shit theory after a few times.
YA lets follow the retarded free keene fools, all we have to do is drive 64 through a school zone area or even through a town, then if a person or a kid isn't riding there bike around the corner and we get pulled over, then we can say either next time we can go 84 and then my neighbor can go 104 or we can then cry I'm not paying. These keene people are idiots.
The guy's whole body language was like the smartass kid in school who thinks he knows it all. The judge did a fine job ignoring his stupidity and getting on with it.
Courts are such a sham. Good for this man to have the guts to stand up to Goliath. The only way to get out of the grip of the court system itself is to use the free will that you were born with to refuse to be subject to any system of man-made governance, unless another natural being is harmed in any way. Admiralty law does not apply to any human being but the crooks have made it apply so they can rape us dry. This is all about revenue under the guise of public safety, period.
He could have added that "- there wasn't even a potential victim, except for someone that upon their own initiative decided to drive much faster than me, which then must be seen as reckless and dangerous behavior" ^^
I can't wait until I can move out of New England. New Hampshire is such a one horse town it's ridiculous. This place doesn't look like a court, it's more like a teachers lounge. I think they had to put four desks together to have a place for the stenographer. I don't mind this guy's attitude, but that's only because it's the same obnoxious tone I hear from every other person in this part of the country. I wish they had my court videos.
DO YOU HAVE A JOB OR ARE YOU IN SCHOOL FULL-TIME? ONE DAY YOU MAY LEARN THAT THE WORLD IS NOT A FAIR PLACE BY HAVING AN OFFICER BEAT THE SHIT OUT OF YOU AND GET AWAY WITH IT.
I'D LIKE TO SEE YOU IN THE MILITARY!
GROW THE F-CK UP AND, IF YOU OBJECT TO THE FINE(S), FIND A RESPECTABLE MANNER TO PROTEST THIS.
PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE DO NOT GET ANY WOMAN PREGNANT. ONE OF YOU IS ALREADY TOO MUCH.
CAPS LOCK IS ON B/C I AM YELLING! THE ONE THING I KNOW FOR SURE FROM WATCHING THIS IS THAT YOU ARE A DISRESPECTFUL PERSON. YOU'RE COCKY AND A LOUDMOUTH. I DO AGREE THIS IS A REVENUE ENHANCER. I ALSO KNOW (OR HOPE) YOU WILL GET THE SH-T KICKED-OUT OF YOU ONE DAY IF YOU CONTINUE THIS ARROGANT, IMMATURE BEHAVIOR. GO CARRY A SIGN AND MARCH, BUT THERE IS NO REASON TO DISRESPECT THE JUDGE IN A COURT THE WAY YOU DID. YOU LOOK AND ACT LIKE A CHILD HERE AND HAVE A LOT OF GROWING UP TO DO!
one if this guy was half way intelligent, there are plenty of ways to beat a ticket. The fact he didn't even try and made an ass of himself proves he got what he deserved. Now, if he had tried to actually beat it and showed up prepared fine I would sympathize with him.
This is the perfect example of a corporation masquerading as government. The Judge, the Prosecutor, and the Police work for the corporation, they are there to make a profit for the corporation known as Keene.
this guys is a douchebag! no need to be rude, the judge didnt give him the ticket. he probably would have walked away winning the case had he been more respectful.
The reason he was found guilty was simply because he had prior citations for the same reason,ive always said fight the first ticket not the second,their is a huge conflict of interest in our corrupt system,judge couldn't explain precisely what the fee was for,no officer present,just a witness,judge is conveniently located near the precinct,not to reduce errors,think the same radar guns being used by the officers are usually donated by the insurance companies to the officers to improve safety?
ha ha ha...I loved the lack of respect he had for the judge. And theres plenty of people who are saying they dont like the freeman in this video being so flipant but that judge in his years will have charged many innocent people of society to make revenue for the state just becuase he can. Its about time he got some stiff resistance
I am an activist and this defendant is just being ridiculous. I myself don't want people driving 64mph through my neighborhood. Pick your battles. Seems he is just arguing for the sake of arguing and taking an unnecessary lump. His enthusiasm against the system could be spent much better in other venues/avenues.
I think this guy is overly rude to the judge.....I love the free state movement but dont make us all look bad by rude behaviour. Standing before the judge is an age old act of respect for the court!
@terry2tone a court of criminals that are trying to generate funds out of thin air... or out of our wallets in a way that is at best unreasonable and definitely unconstitutional. Traffic courts deserve no respect.
This guy deserves a few more tickets. In fact alot of them. Driving dangerously is 20 over the speed limit. If you don't like speed limtis then move to Germany. I bet they really wouldn't put up with your little asshole act.
Some people must understand that there is a difference between freedom and doing whatever you feel like. I'm pro 2nd amendment. I believe that every American trained in the use of firearms should have a right to both conceal and open carry in public. That's a basic right. Going 24 mph over the speed limit is not a right as it endangerers every other motorist on the road. Not standing up just makes him look arrogant. It's Live Free or Die, not act like an idiot or die.
@ac51979 I don't want to get into a pissing match but while he could have been a danger to other people, the prosecution states at the beginning of video that there were no other videos on the road.
This is going to be a biased, but "theoretically" if I was going 120mph at 2:00am on a completely empty highway in a car designed to handle much more, how does that hurt anyone, or even threaten anyone? Inattentive, careless, or even just bad drivers are more of a risk that someone just speeding.
What happen to independence and freedom? OH! that right it was stolen by the goverment and police. All you guy that support this system are idiots and need know how to defend yourself not the system. I know allot of you guys are going to argue with me, but that fine and totally free rights. If you think i should leave and go fuck my self, then you are not supporting freedom and independence but your own abbitions. Dont forget about propaganda....
LOL people with way to much time on there hands, you were going 20 over the limit and you did nothing wrong? you are a moron and hopefully your assinine ways will catch up with you...
The minute the Officer opened her mouth he should have objected Foundation then waited to see what the judge said then if the judge what Foundation he could have said that question calls for facts not in Evidence. Especially the area where he was nailed is that the legal posted speed limit(Speed Survey) Must proceed It's Over before it even starts!!!!
What a complete circus trial. Prosecutor is not well prepared with proper documents when the Judge inquires as to the defendants driving record, defendant shows up to court in shorts/t-shirt which while disrespectful on its face to begin with, is not quite as atrocious as his statements made regarding the rules of the court for standing to address the court. The prosecutor should get her s**t together and the defendant desperately needs a few lessons in courtroom behavior and respect.
What you should have said is "I am here on that matter", "does anyone have a claim against me", Where is the victim or injured party? I have a right to face my accuser. I do not consent, I have no contract. I am a living man on the land, you have no authority I am subject only to common law.
Question for someone more in the know than I but why when making closing statements would the judge ask the prosecutor about his past driving record when he isn't supposed to take any new evidence into consideration?
In fact, why would the judge ask that at all? Shouldn't it be up to the prosecutor to introduce any facts pertaining to the case free of interference or inference or questioning from the judge?
Sorry if this was addressed in the comments elsewhere.
The Judge has found him guilty before asking about his driving record. The fine or punishment he then hands down will reflect how many similar driving offences the guy has committed. The sentencing has nothing to do with the prosecutor.
I thought the judge was great given what he had to work with. The guy that was speeding was a jackass. Sorry. I'm an activist myself. Making a point by being rude isn't what true activist do. This guy just wants the stage.
@psychientology My pants fell down in front of a judge once. True story. The guard came over but I sternly demanded that he not touch me as I gave a very an amazing speech with pants around my anklets. Now that was freeing.
@psychientology i didn't see any rudeness what so ever. if anything the court is being rude by dragging innocent citizens and harassing them through ridiculous charges. its through conditioning that people think this is ok and acceptable.
"Maybe there should be new rules so that if the defendant says he wont pay, they could speed things up..."
The court session finished 9 seconds after he said he wasn't going to pay. How much faster do you want?
The Judge simply wants to give him the option to change his mind. This idiot Barskey is not obliged to take that option and he knows it. He's simply looking to shoehorn in another "I'm being oppressed" soundbite for the camera.
5:20... here's Barskey who has clearly no intention of paying and obviously had made the decision not to pay in advance before going to court.
The judge either is somewhat surprised and a bit dumbfounded that Barskey had said this and didn't know what to do or he deliberately is dragging this on or a combination of the two.
Maybe there should be new rules so that if the defendant says he wont pay, they could speed things up...
Here in Pennsylvania, ALL the judges are like that. Our state maintenence agency PennDot, is a scam in itself. POTHOLE money, and cop quotas....Ive battled many a judge, they actually all drink in the same bars as us...Stupid...A good way to get a cold glass of AMERI-PISS...This fella did nothing incredible..
We don't have a debt prison in the country. If you put someone away until they pay the debt, they can't work to pay the debt off. If he refuses to pay, they can take away his "driving privileges" , and then he can be a traveler instead of a driver. As long as you're participating in their system they will try to hold you subject to it.
he made a VERY clear and VERY logical deduction. "the officer had to make a U-turn AND drive FASTER than i was to catch me, so my speed could not have been a danger to anyone."
what I find eyeraising is the *Penalty fee upon the penalty fee..* however they put it.. for victim rights? or victim something...I'd watch the vid again just to get the language right but that opening scares me.. =0P
What is this man's point? He doesn't believe there should be any rules of the road? That he should be exempt from them? That because he didn't harm anybody he shouldn't be fined? What say ye, liberty activists?
That's not an argument. There are laws against chewing bubblegum while walking backwards on Sunday's... that doesn't make it a socially legitimate or moral restriction.
Should traffic laws be any different from any other involving the voluntary interaction of a group of individuals? Laws in this supposed constitutional republic government are to protect property. Your person being your property. If an individual does not threaten harm or cause harm to another they should be no more fine or punishment then for anything else. This isn't about waiting till someone gets hurt. It's about waiting till someone is being aggressive or threating. Otherwise it's precrime.
So, if a cop sees somebody driving 80 on a residential road on a clear day with nobody around, they should leave the driver alone, but if the same thing is happening and Granny is about to hobble into the roadway, the cop should then step in? No harm, no foul?
If it's reckless driving then intervention would perhaps be reasonable but some arbitrary rule of X MPH is illegitimate. Speed in and of itself has no bearing on safety. It is the act in relation to others and their property. If you really want hard and fast rules for roads... advocate for private roadways. No one will have a leg to stand on WRT rules of the road. Your problem stems ultimately from government ownership of the means of transportation.
Setting aside a private ownership ideal, who determines what is reckless? That's why speed limits exist, to a large extent. Sure, you think you can make that hairpin curve at 50 in your lowrider...but if you can't, you'll be parking your car in somebody else's garage without their permission. Without limits, in my pessimistic view, I think people would intentionally "speed", thinking they could handle it even if they're wrong.
They intentionally speed now. The biggest problems on the road are detractions and false senses of security. Really there is nothing that can be done about the former but WRT the latter some studies regarding the topic have shown that *less* signage and restrictions make people *more* aware of their surroundings and more cautious while driving. Less expectation on others and their behavior.
Even so, somebody on the same curve might go off the road at only 15 miles per hour... but it's much less likely.
I think I'd rather keep some limits, but weigh the existence of those speed limits against whether exceeding said speed limits would be inherently dangerous to life or property. If so, they are mandatory maximum speeds, if not, it is merely a suggestion.
Another question for you that I think falls in the same vein: Do you think people should be allowed to drive drunk?
So long as they do not threaten others it is no different from any other intoxication or being tired. The danger is not inherent to the alcohol but to the reckless actions. You can try to apply positivism to this problem and forever play catchup or you can create a system based on harm which catches all cases.
My problem would be that it would catch them AFTER the harm has been done. I see where you are coming from, but I struggle to see the justification of trading enforced lower travel speeds for increases in injuries.
I'm all for turning many of the freeways in my area into autobahn, but I totally see the point of speed limits in school zones.
See also: Richtgeschwindigkeit
As to drinking I think people react differently to the same amount. Stoppage should be based on recklessness, not blood lvl.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Then take your case to court in order to overturn a law. People who act like the guy in the video are just idiots who deserve punishment for their reckless stupidity.
wow this guy is a prick...pay your fine and get over it! he seemed to be a recurring traffic violator, and don't forget you signed a your driver's license which agreed to the rules of the road...if you don't like them, move somewhere else. =)
I could see if these jokers were fighting some type of horrible Goverment opression but their acting like jackasses over things like speeding tickets, don't walk on the grass signs, and a woman not being able to walk around topless......lol
oh you brave defenders of Liberty!......lol! If you truly lived in a Police State your asses would be kicked, in prison, and maybe even killed. You sure as he'll wouldn't be posting stuff on YouTube.
No. In fact, when you're picking people to employ as cops, the stupider, the better. Wouldn't want police knowledgeable enough to respect people's rights and freedoms, would we?
I can see needing to give people a slap on the rist for some thing like not attending jury duty or speeding but at this point it's just review generation. It's doing nothing to make society work better it's just an excuse to make money. There should be a $50 cap on victimless "crimes" and some should just be dune away with.
Littering is not victimless. At least it shouldn't be. It is trespassing and pollution. An infringement on the owner's rights to their property. The reason littering is a problem is because of the lack of property rights as created by government monopoly on road construction/ownership. Tragedy of the commons. Speeding is entirely different. Should there exist "public" government land the only reason for punishment against an individual should be due to harm or possible harm to another.
How could you possibly measure the risk without knowing the road and conditions? People regularly do 20+ over the speed limit on highways and police leave them alone unless they drive recklessly. Speed is not an indicator of danger in and of itself. NH roads I've found are often rated for speeds slower then similar roads in other states... by a good 10 to 15 MPH in some cases.
In the same way that the government can do a background search into your personal records and security guards can check your bags, yes. They are authorized that authority.
Throw him in jail! The guy has no respect for the law or the justice system. If you don't like the speed limits then go make your arguement (which sounded retarded, so work on it) to the legislature to change the law. Grow up.
If you call it a penalty and charge a percentage/surcharge for receiving that it, ITS A PENALTY!
Then instead of taking his word and allowing him to conduct his business right then and there RIGHT TO A SPEEDY TRIAL, the judge forces the tax payers to pay for an extra day to deal with something he should have done immediately.
The judge just wants it to escalate to Bench Warrent so he can appear as if the man did not handle his part in the matter which he clearly didn't want any part of.
There is activism and plain stupidity. This looked like stupidity because it clearly shows a lack luster attempt of putting a point forward while lounging around. To anyone coming across, the defendant looks like an ass and THAT is not good for public opinion. This kind of stuff will back fire. FAIL...
It's called civil disobedience, ya jackass. We don't have a choice whether or not to obey the law? lol.. That's hilarious. You would have loved living in Nazi Germany.
That doesn't make any sense. I prefer a country that has as lenient laws as the US does. They're easy enough to obey. You have to be seriously retarded to keep getting traffic tickets.
thinkrevolution: Pretty sure the nazi's would have killed this guy instead of giving him a ticket, much less the ability to go to court and try to act all bad ass. This guy seems to ENJOY getting stopped...he is always making his little phone calls to that little porcupine 411 deal. No one is going to get more free because this mope decides he won't pay his ticket....good luck with that btw - take care...bye bye....give me a thumbs down - it makes me smile.
Does the Activists in Keene Plan on or currently enforce the COMMON LAW instead of this Quazi Law the current BAR incorporates on unsuspecting victems for the corporate machine? known as to most as STATE? If perhaps your COMMON LAW Constitutionally correct could viably supena or summon said judge and lawyer and even: (all Persons involved) then perhaps they would begin to take you seriously as a viable and powerful constitutional enforcement, WE THE PEOPLE! see Rob Meynard, hes planning it in BC
he's probably talking about FDRs executive order in april of 1933 that made it forbidden to own physical gold and we had to turn in the gold we owned to the Federal Reserve thru local banks or it would be up to ten years in prison. the great gold heist! then the boob set up the bretton woods system in 1941-44 that made it where only govt to govt transactions are to be carried out with real gold, and citizen to gov't is dollars set at $35 an oz of gold. how can people respect FDR? he was a boob
now maybe some of these people can realize how the State owns the vehicle evidenced by the 'Title' and 'Tags'
Also, lets not forget, by applying for a drivers license you're waiving your inherited rights. When you show a police officer said license, you are stating;
I waived my rights and give you juridiction outside of a peace officer capacity.
He was screwed as soon as he voluntarily entered the court room and stated his name. As soon as you do that, you implicitly agree to a contract with the judge and are bound to the conditions that the judge imposes in that contract.
By Law you are bound by what the Judge decrees whether you enter the court room or not. In fact if you refuse to show up for court that's a Felony alone even if the original charge was minor in nature and a bench warrant will be issued for your arrest by the Judge.
There are ways to get out of it, but most people don't bother as they would just rather pay the ticket and be done with the hassle, and that is part of the grand scam. There is not enough space on Youtube to explain strawmen and UCC codes and what not. Forms to file, sovreignity to declare, so on, so forth. They make it a pain in the ass on purpose.
Thats irrelevant and equivalent to saying be a certain age size race if you want to be taken seriously. If its not outside of court rules then shut up and seriously look at the big picture instead of acting childish by using your shock value on every small movement and making them the subject of this video.
Yes, you need to be 18 or over to be an adult. People under that age do not have the same rights and are not mature enough to understand them. If you think they do then you are not a mature person. If you want to be taken seriously then act seriously.
O sure, VANVALIS, let's just assume that all people under 18 don't have the maturity to understand their rights. This is a valid assumption, because as we all know, maturity is something that you magically gain on your 18th birthday.
Also, Ridley has become more of a joke to all Americans with his eccentric singing and passive extremist propaganda than a serious leader. Good job, Ridley...way to rack up the arrests withojut accomplishing a God damned thing.
phartster 2 weeks ago
When the Freestate project began, I was a member. They have become a group of activists turned extremist and I have been embarrassed by their bullish stupidity to the point of cutting ALL ties with them. This guy is another "victimless crime" douche that threatens all societies. This person paints a terrible picture of the Freestate movement. . The Freestate Movement is now full of weak, uneducated, and disrespectful sheep...many of which I can personally attest have criminal backgrounds.
phartster 2 weeks ago
Some one needs a cough lozenge!
johnnystratman1 4 weeks ago
What a douche, he's trying to make it sound like he has options to pay this fine lmao.
You were speeding bud, get disciplined you dbag.
cleve101 2 months ago
Comment removed
cleve101 2 months ago
Why are you people going to court and admitting guilt time and time again? Why don't you just say I have been driving for x amount of years and by the fact that my license have been renewed x amount of time the state has showed that they find no fault in the way I operated my car. I am a safe driver, as indicated by my record. I was driving safely on the date in question. I was involved in no accidents before or after I was impeded by the officer.
mrrodneyalong 2 months ago
@mrrodneyalong I request that the court have the equipment the officer was using tested by an Independent lab in which I am allowed to witness the testing. I also request the logs records and any other papers that track the general maintenance and repairs for the equipment used on the day in question in the attempt to witness my speed. I also ask for a copy of the officers certification on the equipment in question.
mrrodneyalong 2 months ago
@mrrodneyalong ask the officer directly if there has ever been a malfunction of the equipment- ask speciftly if it has ever gave a speed reading when no cars were traveling towards or away from the unit. Ask him if it is not true that the unit will sometimes show a speed when no cars are around. Ask if he knows that the equipment is not 100% accurate. Ask if it is possible that the equipment malfunctioned at anytime that day or any other day.Then ask if they ever require maintenance.
mrrodneyalong 2 months ago
Wow this guy is just a douche. It's pretty easy to show that you don't give a shit about authority, but there are protocols in court which you have to follow and talking down to a judge is just plain stupid. I wish he'd have been found in contempt of court.
USGiorgi 2 months ago
lame excuse....you're a radical...please go back to Massachusetts.
murphjy 4 months ago
My opinion is this; if you operate your vehicle without paying for you tabs or dl, you are stealing from me and the state. If you break the traffic law even if you harm none you should be charged. Even though you put the cop in some danger. I bet you hold to the same theory as some civil libertarian do no harm no charge. Someone should use your family as target practice not actually hurt them mind you just come close to it. See if you hold the that bull shit theory after a few times.
samten10a 5 months ago
YA lets follow the retarded free keene fools, all we have to do is drive 64 through a school zone area or even through a town, then if a person or a kid isn't riding there bike around the corner and we get pulled over, then we can say either next time we can go 84 and then my neighbor can go 104 or we can then cry I'm not paying. These keene people are idiots.
Shine8675 5 months ago
Bravo!
tjohn1986 8 months ago
The guy's whole body language was like the smartass kid in school who thinks he knows it all. The judge did a fine job ignoring his stupidity and getting on with it.
johnnystratman1 8 months ago 2
Courts are such a sham. Good for this man to have the guts to stand up to Goliath. The only way to get out of the grip of the court system itself is to use the free will that you were born with to refuse to be subject to any system of man-made governance, unless another natural being is harmed in any way. Admiralty law does not apply to any human being but the crooks have made it apply so they can rape us dry. This is all about revenue under the guise of public safety, period.
cockyhemi 10 months ago
He could have added that "- there wasn't even a potential victim, except for someone that upon their own initiative decided to drive much faster than me, which then must be seen as reckless and dangerous behavior" ^^
Kenzofeis 11 months ago
I can't wait until I can move out of New England. New Hampshire is such a one horse town it's ridiculous. This place doesn't look like a court, it's more like a teachers lounge. I think they had to put four desks together to have a place for the stenographer. I don't mind this guy's attitude, but that's only because it's the same obnoxious tone I hear from every other person in this part of the country. I wish they had my court videos.
portersajeenyus 1 year ago
@301gunnar --Amen to that, gunnar!!
msk7046 1 year ago
DO YOU HAVE A JOB OR ARE YOU IN SCHOOL FULL-TIME? ONE DAY YOU MAY LEARN THAT THE WORLD IS NOT A FAIR PLACE BY HAVING AN OFFICER BEAT THE SHIT OUT OF YOU AND GET AWAY WITH IT.
I'D LIKE TO SEE YOU IN THE MILITARY!
GROW THE F-CK UP AND, IF YOU OBJECT TO THE FINE(S), FIND A RESPECTABLE MANNER TO PROTEST THIS.
PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE DO NOT GET ANY WOMAN PREGNANT. ONE OF YOU IS ALREADY TOO MUCH.
YOU ARE A L O S E R.
msk7046 1 year ago
CAPS LOCK IS ON B/C I AM YELLING! THE ONE THING I KNOW FOR SURE FROM WATCHING THIS IS THAT YOU ARE A DISRESPECTFUL PERSON. YOU'RE COCKY AND A LOUDMOUTH. I DO AGREE THIS IS A REVENUE ENHANCER. I ALSO KNOW (OR HOPE) YOU WILL GET THE SH-T KICKED-OUT OF YOU ONE DAY IF YOU CONTINUE THIS ARROGANT, IMMATURE BEHAVIOR. GO CARRY A SIGN AND MARCH, BUT THERE IS NO REASON TO DISRESPECT THE JUDGE IN A COURT THE WAY YOU DID. YOU LOOK AND ACT LIKE A CHILD HERE AND HAVE A LOT OF GROWING UP TO DO!
msk7046 1 year ago
one if this guy was half way intelligent, there are plenty of ways to beat a ticket. The fact he didn't even try and made an ass of himself proves he got what he deserved. Now, if he had tried to actually beat it and showed up prepared fine I would sympathize with him.
laxguy22655 1 year ago
This is the perfect example of a corporation masquerading as government. The Judge, the Prosecutor, and the Police work for the corporation, they are there to make a profit for the corporation known as Keene.
brainerdrebel 1 year ago
this guys is a douchebag! no need to be rude, the judge didnt give him the ticket. he probably would have walked away winning the case had he been more respectful.
rollinstoned0 1 year ago
@rollinstoned0 Yeah, he might come off as a douchebag, but at least he's no criminal. No victim=no crime.
yinzjagoffs 1 year ago
@yinzjagoffs i agree, no victim no crime! but communication between 2 people never has to be rude.
rollinstoned0 8 months ago
Lol there's a fine line between having balls, and just being a plain douche
dmix09 1 year ago 11
@dmix09 --PERFECTLY SAID!
msk7046 1 year ago
The reason he was found guilty was simply because he had prior citations for the same reason,ive always said fight the first ticket not the second,their is a huge conflict of interest in our corrupt system,judge couldn't explain precisely what the fee was for,no officer present,just a witness,judge is conveniently located near the precinct,not to reduce errors,think the same radar guns being used by the officers are usually donated by the insurance companies to the officers to improve safety?
tonyhdz985 1 year ago
ha ha ha...I loved the lack of respect he had for the judge. And theres plenty of people who are saying they dont like the freeman in this video being so flipant but that judge in his years will have charged many innocent people of society to make revenue for the state just becuase he can. Its about time he got some stiff resistance
ashleelmb 1 year ago 3
I am an activist and this defendant is just being ridiculous. I myself don't want people driving 64mph through my neighborhood. Pick your battles. Seems he is just arguing for the sake of arguing and taking an unnecessary lump. His enthusiasm against the system could be spent much better in other venues/avenues.
peaceoftheaction 1 year ago
I think this guy is overly rude to the judge.....I love the free state movement but dont make us all look bad by rude behaviour. Standing before the judge is an age old act of respect for the court!
terry2tone 1 year ago
@terry2tone a court of criminals that are trying to generate funds out of thin air... or out of our wallets in a way that is at best unreasonable and definitely unconstitutional. Traffic courts deserve no respect.
Mooseboy240 1 year ago 4
he would have probly won if he didnt have an attitude... and a bad record
the3VIL 1 year ago
You should have never touch or kiddnapped the People of the Book, nor laid hands on their possessions,
and now OIL, OIL Everywhere...
Time to pay for the sins of your fathers. The gathering has begun and the Hidden Ones have begun to awaken!
emanxavier 1 year ago
bunch of stupid hippies
ibreakkidslegs 1 year ago
This guy deserves a few more tickets. In fact alot of them. Driving dangerously is 20 over the speed limit. If you don't like speed limtis then move to Germany. I bet they really wouldn't put up with your little asshole act.
RANDY64612 2 years ago
@RANDY64612 No one was hurt.
nano34228 1 year ago
Some people must understand that there is a difference between freedom and doing whatever you feel like. I'm pro 2nd amendment. I believe that every American trained in the use of firearms should have a right to both conceal and open carry in public. That's a basic right. Going 24 mph over the speed limit is not a right as it endangerers every other motorist on the road. Not standing up just makes him look arrogant. It's Live Free or Die, not act like an idiot or die.
ac51979 2 years ago
@ac51979 I don't want to get into a pissing match but while he could have been a danger to other people, the prosecution states at the beginning of video that there were no other videos on the road.
This is going to be a biased, but "theoretically" if I was going 120mph at 2:00am on a completely empty highway in a car designed to handle much more, how does that hurt anyone, or even threaten anyone? Inattentive, careless, or even just bad drivers are more of a risk that someone just speeding.
ickyickyyaya2000 1 year ago
@ickyickyyaya2000 "Inattentive, careless, or even just bad drivers are more of a risk that [sic] someone just speeding. "
Or cops making a U-turn and driving 150 mph to catch you.
bluecobra95 1 year ago
What happen to independence and freedom? OH! that right it was stolen by the goverment and police. All you guy that support this system are idiots and need know how to defend yourself not the system. I know allot of you guys are going to argue with me, but that fine and totally free rights. If you think i should leave and go fuck my self, then you are not supporting freedom and independence but your own abbitions. Dont forget about propaganda....
Markedguardian 2 years ago
LOL people with way to much time on there hands, you were going 20 over the limit and you did nothing wrong? you are a moron and hopefully your assinine ways will catch up with you...
chowhound3 2 years ago
The minute the Officer opened her mouth he should have objected Foundation then waited to see what the judge said then if the judge what Foundation he could have said that question calls for facts not in Evidence. Especially the area where he was nailed is that the legal posted speed limit(Speed Survey) Must proceed It's Over before it even starts!!!!
brookwest 2 years ago
What a complete circus trial. Prosecutor is not well prepared with proper documents when the Judge inquires as to the defendants driving record, defendant shows up to court in shorts/t-shirt which while disrespectful on its face to begin with, is not quite as atrocious as his statements made regarding the rules of the court for standing to address the court. The prosecutor should get her s**t together and the defendant desperately needs a few lessons in courtroom behavior and respect.
rpflynn 2 years ago
That guys got some balls. Only in New Hampshire!
Estate17 2 years ago
What you should have said is "I am here on that matter", "does anyone have a claim against me", Where is the victim or injured party? I have a right to face my accuser. I do not consent, I have no contract. I am a living man on the land, you have no authority I am subject only to common law.
freedomspotlight 2 years ago
LMFAO
Yeah, that'll work. I'm sure the whole US judicial system will crumble once it's faced with that.
Give it a try. Post the results on YouTube
billburns2 2 years ago
Question for someone more in the know than I but why when making closing statements would the judge ask the prosecutor about his past driving record when he isn't supposed to take any new evidence into consideration?
In fact, why would the judge ask that at all? Shouldn't it be up to the prosecutor to introduce any facts pertaining to the case free of interference or inference or questioning from the judge?
Sorry if this was addressed in the comments elsewhere.
Smackchow 2 years ago
The Judge has found him guilty before asking about his driving record. The fine or punishment he then hands down will reflect how many similar driving offences the guy has committed. The sentencing has nothing to do with the prosecutor.
billburns2 2 years ago
Ahh, gotcha. Thanks for the clarification.
Didn't think the sentencing had anything to do with the prosecutor, was just wondering why he would ask her.
Once again, thank ya much.
Smackchow 2 years ago
a very interesting exchange between all parties. Everyone pretty much played out their own principled roles without being too adversarial.
tonysshadow 2 years ago
Show the judge the exact amount of respect he deserves...absolutely none.
Taors 2 years ago
he's a cunt
iamhaterman 2 years ago 2
ingorance...why would you say you will not pay a fine before you are convicted??
berdoofool 2 years ago 2
I thought the judge was great given what he had to work with. The guy that was speeding was a jackass. Sorry. I'm an activist myself. Making a point by being rude isn't what true activist do. This guy just wants the stage.
psychientology 2 years ago 17
@psychientology My pants fell down in front of a judge once. True story. The guard came over but I sternly demanded that he not touch me as I gave a very an amazing speech with pants around my anklets. Now that was freeing.
portersajeenyus 1 year ago
@psychientology I agree....everything from his body language to his para-verbal communication reeks of an obtuse intellect.
Weygandt 3 months ago
@psychientology i didn't see any rudeness what so ever. if anything the court is being rude by dragging innocent citizens and harassing them through ridiculous charges. its through conditioning that people think this is ok and acceptable.
mbozza 1 month ago
"Maybe there should be new rules so that if the defendant says he wont pay, they could speed things up..."
The court session finished 9 seconds after he said he wasn't going to pay. How much faster do you want?
The Judge simply wants to give him the option to change his mind. This idiot Barskey is not obliged to take that option and he knows it. He's simply looking to shoehorn in another "I'm being oppressed" soundbite for the camera.
billburns2 2 years ago
5:20... here's Barskey who has clearly no intention of paying and obviously had made the decision not to pay in advance before going to court.
The judge either is somewhat surprised and a bit dumbfounded that Barskey had said this and didn't know what to do or he deliberately is dragging this on or a combination of the two.
Maybe there should be new rules so that if the defendant says he wont pay, they could speed things up...
InfoWarriorMaverick 2 years ago
"I'm standing up even though it means nothing to me"
"I don't want that opportunity. You're going to force it on me"
What a dick.
Do all "activists" act like sulky teenagers or is it just this idiot?
billburns2 2 years ago
I bet when you go to court you give the judge and prosecutor a can of KY and tell them to go to work while you sit there and stay quite don't you...?
InfoWarriorMaverick 2 years ago
Oh - another tough talking keyboard warrior.
I have read your posts and I'm not even going to try an educate a twat like you on what it means to be a responsible citizen.
Go off to your fantasy "Do-Whatever-U-Want" land and play with the other 8 year olds, then stamp your foot and shout "IT'S NOT FAIR" boohoohoo.
billburns2 2 years ago
State Sponsored Theft !.........
freedombiteback 2 years ago
It's all about revenue generation. If governments want to prove otherwise, they would give drivers the choice:
-Fine
-Community service
-Jail
-Revoked drivers license
Breaking the law, and then requiring you to pay to get off the hook is corruption.
diggingforgold 2 years ago
Here in Pennsylvania, ALL the judges are like that. Our state maintenence agency PennDot, is a scam in itself. POTHOLE money, and cop quotas....Ive battled many a judge, they actually all drink in the same bars as us...Stupid...A good way to get a cold glass of AMERI-PISS...This fella did nothing incredible..
XhosStyleX 2 years ago
We don't have a debt prison in the country. If you put someone away until they pay the debt, they can't work to pay the debt off. If he refuses to pay, they can take away his "driving privileges" , and then he can be a traveler instead of a driver. As long as you're participating in their system they will try to hold you subject to it.
conspiracy777 2 years ago
he made a VERY clear and VERY logical deduction. "the officer had to make a U-turn AND drive FASTER than i was to catch me, so my speed could not have been a danger to anyone."
mbzastava 2 years ago
That's a ridiculous argument.
billburns2 2 years ago
MBZASTAVA ---
yes it did and you indanger the cop besides the rest of the public.
samatention 2 years ago
Traffic enforcement is simply a way to make money and hire more. Another Government scam.
Bill44copwatch 2 years ago
Just trying to keep the slaves in line. Move along, there's nothing for you here.
5tevef 2 years ago
Well played.
Elephantintheroom01 2 years ago 2
Maybe he can join Ed and Elaine Brown in prison. Stay classy NH!
Diatonic5th 2 years ago
what I find eyeraising is the *Penalty fee upon the penalty fee..* however they put it.. for victim rights? or victim something...I'd watch the vid again just to get the language right but that opening scares me.. =0P
tracehd1 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
the guys probably a wife beater i'm 99% sure
riellehunter 2 years ago
please take a class on critical thinking at your local community college.
justwatchmyfavorites 2 years ago 3
you're a fagget low life
iamhaterman 2 years ago
I guess you're not interested in learning how poorly your brain is currently functioning.
justwatchmyfavorites 2 years ago
are you a molester?
hearitherefirst 2 years ago
are you incapable of thought?
justwatchmyfavorites 2 years ago
nevermind, i see you're just a serf. it's not your fault, you don't know any better.
justwatchmyfavorites 2 years ago
I hate that fuckin intro
mlkkkkkkk 2 years ago
lol..ditto!
tracehd1 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The judge should have put the man in jail.
CommonSenseJoe 2 years ago
Jail? Really? Who did he harm?
shmutzo 2 years ago 3
How does that matter? He broke the law. He admitted it and refuses to pay the penalty. Put him in jail until he pays the fine.
CommonSenseJoe 2 years ago
Simple defense.... ask the police officer how often the radar has to be calibrated and the date it was last calibrated..
sigmet61 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The guy should put on some pants when he goes to court!
VANVALIS 2 years ago
Comment removed
papito2you 2 years ago
It's not the speed limits I have a problem with, it's all the other cars in front of me.
Thraxter 2 years ago
But yes, it is a victimless crime.
InfoWarriorMaverick 2 years ago
About the "victimless crime" issue...
It's all about how you put it into context and perspective.
In this case, this "crime" belongs in the potential victim arena as do the many traffic laws as well as so many other laws.
See WikiPedia for more info.
InfoWarriorMaverick 2 years ago
What is this man's point? He doesn't believe there should be any rules of the road? That he should be exempt from them? That because he didn't harm anybody he shouldn't be fined? What say ye, liberty activists?
watcher8o 2 years ago
How can there be a real crime without an actual victim?
landofbile 2 years ago
Because we have laws here in reality.
p00lman 2 years ago
That's not an argument. There are laws against chewing bubblegum while walking backwards on Sunday's... that doesn't make it a socially legitimate or moral restriction.
landofbile 2 years ago 3
So, traffic laws should be mere recommendations until somebody gets hurt?
watcher8o 2 years ago
Should traffic laws be any different from any other involving the voluntary interaction of a group of individuals? Laws in this supposed constitutional republic government are to protect property. Your person being your property. If an individual does not threaten harm or cause harm to another they should be no more fine or punishment then for anything else. This isn't about waiting till someone gets hurt. It's about waiting till someone is being aggressive or threating. Otherwise it's precrime.
landofbile 2 years ago
So, if a cop sees somebody driving 80 on a residential road on a clear day with nobody around, they should leave the driver alone, but if the same thing is happening and Granny is about to hobble into the roadway, the cop should then step in? No harm, no foul?
watcher8o 2 years ago
If it's reckless driving then intervention would perhaps be reasonable but some arbitrary rule of X MPH is illegitimate. Speed in and of itself has no bearing on safety. It is the act in relation to others and their property. If you really want hard and fast rules for roads... advocate for private roadways. No one will have a leg to stand on WRT rules of the road. Your problem stems ultimately from government ownership of the means of transportation.
landofbile 2 years ago 3
Setting aside a private ownership ideal, who determines what is reckless? That's why speed limits exist, to a large extent. Sure, you think you can make that hairpin curve at 50 in your lowrider...but if you can't, you'll be parking your car in somebody else's garage without their permission. Without limits, in my pessimistic view, I think people would intentionally "speed", thinking they could handle it even if they're wrong.
watcher8o 2 years ago
They intentionally speed now. The biggest problems on the road are detractions and false senses of security. Really there is nothing that can be done about the former but WRT the latter some studies regarding the topic have shown that *less* signage and restrictions make people *more* aware of their surroundings and more cautious while driving. Less expectation on others and their behavior.
landofbile 2 years ago
Even so, somebody on the same curve might go off the road at only 15 miles per hour... but it's much less likely.
I think I'd rather keep some limits, but weigh the existence of those speed limits against whether exceeding said speed limits would be inherently dangerous to life or property. If so, they are mandatory maximum speeds, if not, it is merely a suggestion.
Another question for you that I think falls in the same vein: Do you think people should be allowed to drive drunk?
watcher8o 2 years ago
So long as they do not threaten others it is no different from any other intoxication or being tired. The danger is not inherent to the alcohol but to the reckless actions. You can try to apply positivism to this problem and forever play catchup or you can create a system based on harm which catches all cases.
landofbile 2 years ago
My problem would be that it would catch them AFTER the harm has been done. I see where you are coming from, but I struggle to see the justification of trading enforced lower travel speeds for increases in injuries.
I'm all for turning many of the freeways in my area into autobahn, but I totally see the point of speed limits in school zones.
See also: Richtgeschwindigkeit
As to drinking I think people react differently to the same amount. Stoppage should be based on recklessness, not blood lvl.
watcher8o 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Then take your case to court in order to overturn a law. People who act like the guy in the video are just idiots who deserve punishment for their reckless stupidity.
p00lman 2 years ago
Imo, it's only reasonable for someone to get punished if the government can prove that you were posing a threat to someone.
JoelMatton 2 years ago 2
Sounds good to me.
InfoWarriorMaverick 2 years ago
no, speed limits should be set based on scientific measurement, not revenue generation needs.
flowerpt 2 years ago
wow this guy is a prick...pay your fine and get over it! he seemed to be a recurring traffic violator, and don't forget you signed a your driver's license which agreed to the rules of the road...if you don't like them, move somewhere else. =)
gsadler82 2 years ago
I could see if these jokers were fighting some type of horrible Goverment opression but their acting like jackasses over things like speeding tickets, don't walk on the grass signs, and a woman not being able to walk around topless......lol
oh you brave defenders of Liberty!......lol! If you truly lived in a Police State your asses would be kicked, in prison, and maybe even killed. You sure as he'll wouldn't be posting stuff on YouTube.
Iraq shut down the Net after their Elections!
ConservativeAtheist 2 years ago
Exactly. This guy's lucky enough to still have a driver's license.
p00lman 2 years ago
His actions are brave and admirable like as are the many others with their civil disobedience acts there in NH.
He is not allowing the government to take his money. Instead they will have to bear the cost of putting him in jail, feeding him etc.
It is a way to effect change in the way the laws are.
InfoWarriorMaverick 2 years ago 3
I seriously doubt a single petulant idiot will change anything. He'll serve jail time for a lost cause.
p00lman 2 years ago
I could be wrong about them having to "bear the cost of putting him in jail, feeding him etc."
If there is someone more knowledgeable on this subject please share what you know.
InfoWarriorMaverick 2 years ago
No. In fact, when you're picking people to employ as cops, the stupider, the better. Wouldn't want police knowledgeable enough to respect people's rights and freedoms, would we?
MutantBamHammer 2 years ago
I can see needing to give people a slap on the rist for some thing like not attending jury duty or speeding but at this point it's just review generation. It's doing nothing to make society work better it's just an excuse to make money. There should be a $50 cap on victimless "crimes" and some should just be dune away with.
sharpie443 2 years ago
Littering is a victimless crime, but if anyone and everyone were allowed to do it without penalty, the environment would look like shit.
It's worth having moral and societal standards.
p00lman 2 years ago
Littering is not victimless. At least it shouldn't be. It is trespassing and pollution. An infringement on the owner's rights to their property. The reason littering is a problem is because of the lack of property rights as created by government monopoly on road construction/ownership. Tragedy of the commons. Speeding is entirely different. Should there exist "public" government land the only reason for punishment against an individual should be due to harm or possible harm to another.
landofbile 2 years ago 2
Going 25 miles over the speed limit causes possible risk for at least this dumbfuck and anyone else unlucky enough to be on the road with him.
p00lman 2 years ago
How could you possibly measure the risk without knowing the road and conditions? People regularly do 20+ over the speed limit on highways and police leave them alone unless they drive recklessly. Speed is not an indicator of danger in and of itself. NH roads I've found are often rated for speeds slower then similar roads in other states... by a good 10 to 15 MPH in some cases.
landofbile 2 years ago
So do the police get to break the law in order to enforce it?
BOBSMOKETV 2 years ago
In the same way that the government can do a background search into your personal records and security guards can check your bags, yes. They are authorized that authority.
p00lman 2 years ago
I'm sorry, but none of what you wrote can be done without your consent.
BOBSMOKETV 2 years ago
I consent to police speeding in order to catch criminals who are speeding.
p00lman 2 years ago
Throw him in jail! The guy has no respect for the law or the justice system. If you don't like the speed limits then go make your arguement (which sounded retarded, so work on it) to the legislature to change the law. Grow up.
dave31870 2 years ago
Exactly.
p00lman 2 years ago
If you call it a penalty and charge a percentage/surcharge for receiving that it, ITS A PENALTY!
Then instead of taking his word and allowing him to conduct his business right then and there RIGHT TO A SPEEDY TRIAL, the judge forces the tax payers to pay for an extra day to deal with something he should have done immediately.
The judge just wants it to escalate to Bench Warrent so he can appear as if the man did not handle his part in the matter which he clearly didn't want any part of.
BOBSMOKETV 2 years ago
The judge already knows how to handle a Bench Warrent. Seems like the judge needed the time to study how to handle this type of civil disobedience.
BOBSMOKETV 2 years ago
More like the judge couldn't believe the degree of stupidity he was dealing with.
p00lman 2 years ago
I paid a $150 fine for missing jury duty. Pure revenue generation for Sonoma Co.. Did I break the law by not opening my mail? or receiving it?
So the County sends out a process server to my home. The PC costs less than the fines generated.
Feck the County Govt., which is the largest single employer in Sonoma Co.. Feck 'em all!
mcgrawtim123 2 years ago 2
There is activism and plain stupidity. This looked like stupidity because it clearly shows a lack luster attempt of putting a point forward while lounging around. To anyone coming across, the defendant looks like an ass and THAT is not good for public opinion. This kind of stuff will back fire. FAIL...
luxordeathbed 2 years ago
well done.
elliotcheely 2 years ago
He does make a point 2:28. The Maine State Police do the same think on I-95. Pure revenue generation.
Fotrane 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
What an idiot. If you break the law and get a ticket, you pay it.
You don't have a choice whether or not to obey the law.
This guy is acting like a pathetic little child.
p00lman 2 years ago
It's called civil disobedience, ya jackass. We don't have a choice whether or not to obey the law? lol.. That's hilarious. You would have loved living in Nazi Germany.
thinkrevolution 2 years ago
That doesn't make any sense. I prefer a country that has as lenient laws as the US does. They're easy enough to obey. You have to be seriously retarded to keep getting traffic tickets.
p00lman 2 years ago
thinkrevolution: Pretty sure the nazi's would have killed this guy instead of giving him a ticket, much less the ability to go to court and try to act all bad ass. This guy seems to ENJOY getting stopped...he is always making his little phone calls to that little porcupine 411 deal. No one is going to get more free because this mope decides he won't pay his ticket....good luck with that btw - take care...bye bye....give me a thumbs down - it makes me smile.
SILENTNATION1 2 years ago
p00lman, Not all laws are reasonable and worth obeying.
MooseOfReason 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
That is not for you as a regular citizen to decide. If you believe they should be changed, then you should go into politics and lobby for a change.
p00lman 2 years ago
So Martin Luther King, Jr., should have run for Congress instead?
MooseOfReason 2 years ago 2
Is speeding an issue of human rights and equality?
No, it's an issue of being too reckless and stupid and potential endangerous other people and yourself.
p00lman 2 years ago
p00lman, You're the one who made the ambiguous statement in the first place that, "You don't have a choice whether or not to obey the law."
But now you change your mind to make it sound like you were talking about a narrow subject.
MooseOfReason 2 years ago 3
Civil rights are laws.
If you can appeal that traffic violation laws are less important than a greater law, please show me what that law is.
p00lman 2 years ago
Does the Activists in Keene Plan on or currently enforce the COMMON LAW instead of this Quazi Law the current BAR incorporates on unsuspecting victems for the corporate machine? known as to most as STATE? If perhaps your COMMON LAW Constitutionally correct could viably supena or summon said judge and lawyer and even: (all Persons involved) then perhaps they would begin to take you seriously as a viable and powerful constitutional enforcement, WE THE PEOPLE! see Rob Meynard, hes planning it in BC
neven01 2 years ago 2
I love, love, love Mr. Barskey!
BagOfEyebrows 2 years ago
Love it!
thinkrevolution 2 years ago
its impossible to actually 'pay' since 1933.
flippinrawks 2 years ago
I don't get this comment. What happened in 1933?
MutantBamHammer 2 years ago
he's probably talking about FDRs executive order in april of 1933 that made it forbidden to own physical gold and we had to turn in the gold we owned to the Federal Reserve thru local banks or it would be up to ten years in prison. the great gold heist! then the boob set up the bretton woods system in 1941-44 that made it where only govt to govt transactions are to be carried out with real gold, and citizen to gov't is dollars set at $35 an oz of gold. how can people respect FDR? he was a boob
soundmoneyfan 2 years ago
thank you soundmoneyfan, that was perfect.
now maybe some of these people can realize how the State owns the vehicle evidenced by the 'Title' and 'Tags'
Also, lets not forget, by applying for a drivers license you're waiving your inherited rights. When you show a police officer said license, you are stating;
I waived my rights and give you juridiction outside of a peace officer capacity.
flippinrawks 2 years ago
Ridley for some reason I can't see this Video on my I-Phone on most if not all of the other Videos you uploaded I could???
ConservativeAtheist 2 years ago
He was screwed as soon as he voluntarily entered the court room and stated his name. As soon as you do that, you implicitly agree to a contract with the judge and are bound to the conditions that the judge imposes in that contract.
jailarson 2 years ago 3
By Law you are bound by what the Judge decrees whether you enter the court room or not. In fact if you refuse to show up for court that's a Felony alone even if the original charge was minor in nature and a bench warrant will be issued for your arrest by the Judge.
ConservativeAtheist 2 years ago 3
There are ways to get out of it, but most people don't bother as they would just rather pay the ticket and be done with the hassle, and that is part of the grand scam. There is not enough space on Youtube to explain strawmen and UCC codes and what not. Forms to file, sovreignity to declare, so on, so forth. They make it a pain in the ass on purpose.
jailarson 2 years ago
No. A GED will suffice.
jailarson 2 years ago 3
So did they toss him in jail or let him get away with not paying it?
eurohim 2 years ago
Taking more money from the working american to keep us enslaved.
Income tax, property tax, state fees and fines etc. keep feeding the growing giant pig that is govenrment
rage340 2 years ago 5
Not if I can help it!
*unemployed*
*lives w/ mother*
damn...
MutantBamHammer 2 years ago
Bad body language. The guy is sitting like he is a 5 year old. Be serious if you want to be taken serious.
VANVALIS 2 years ago
Thats irrelevant and equivalent to saying be a certain age size race if you want to be taken seriously. If its not outside of court rules then shut up and seriously look at the big picture instead of acting childish by using your shock value on every small movement and making them the subject of this video.
Anothercoilgun 2 years ago
Yes, you need to be 18 or over to be an adult. People under that age do not have the same rights and are not mature enough to understand them. If you think they do then you are not a mature person. If you want to be taken seriously then act seriously.
VANVALIS 2 years ago
You're an idiot.
odigity 2 years ago
O sure, VANVALIS, let's just assume that all people under 18 don't have the maturity to understand their rights. This is a valid assumption, because as we all know, maturity is something that you magically gain on your 18th birthday.
MutantBamHammer 2 years ago
That's funny. I hadn't noticed on account of I WAS PAYING ATTENTION TO HIS ARGUMENTS.
MutantBamHammer 2 years ago
lmao
BOBSMOKETV 2 years ago
there's a grown man dressed in a robe imposing the Law of Commerce (Fleet, Law of the Sea, Admiralty...whatever you want to call it) on a freeman.
Maybe the assholes in the robes need to start taking us seriously.
nilesmc 2 years ago 5