seems to be thicker as the 505... i dont need build in light, an ordinary book even doesnt have it, and i think it will have less battery time... touchscreens are a nice idea, but i dont like to read through my own fingerprints... i prefer the 505...
I recently went to a sony style store to look at the 700 next to the 505 and yes the screen on the 505 is much better IMO. (I have the 505). The 700 has a horrible glare on the screen which makes it difficult if not distracting to use. Nice to have a built in light, touch screen cool, but those do not make much difference if you have to battle a glare constantly.
@Fer860 Few people seem to object to the fact that the touch technology appears to require a more reflective screen - and so becomes illegible in bright light - as when outside in the sun!! Sony's adverts regarding reading in sunlight do not however bother to differentiate - claim 505 same as 700 - which it just isn't.
Contrast is much better on the prs-505 than on the prs-700.
Another fail from Sony.
dtz1000 11 months ago
Poor sony. That shit looks cheap and out dated. Come on sony give me somthing better then the ipad. Make your reader on 3d or somthing.
masterlee123 1 year ago
@masterlee123 its out dated bc it was the new thing two years ago...
miggie333 1 year ago
I think that I'll just still stickin' to the foxit eslick.. the best ereader by far!
Shifty3651727 1 year ago
As far as I can see, the 505 has much better contrast.
richcoolerearth 2 years ago
seems to be thicker as the 505... i dont need build in light, an ordinary book even doesnt have it, and i think it will have less battery time... touchscreens are a nice idea, but i dont like to read through my own fingerprints... i prefer the 505...
reddie74 2 years ago 2
it does not have a built in backlight, it has duel side screen lighting.
alildevil 2 years ago
What about the differences in screen? The 505 is better, don't you think? But no touchscreen... Waiting for the PRS 800something?
Fer860 2 years ago
I recently went to a sony style store to look at the 700 next to the 505 and yes the screen on the 505 is much better IMO. (I have the 505). The 700 has a horrible glare on the screen which makes it difficult if not distracting to use. Nice to have a built in light, touch screen cool, but those do not make much difference if you have to battle a glare constantly.
constroy 2 years ago
Exactly. So Sony doesn't make a lot of progress. One step for Sony is a stumble for mankind.
Fer860 2 years ago
funny. maybe the next one will be better. maybe...
pinkcat1305 2 years ago
@Fer860 Few people seem to object to the fact that the touch technology appears to require a more reflective screen - and so becomes illegible in bright light - as when outside in the sun!! Sony's adverts regarding reading in sunlight do not however bother to differentiate - claim 505 same as 700 - which it just isn't.
mikexeon1 1 year ago
you da man!
holtzmichael 2 years ago
Thank you. Nice and quick!
darkpoet1978 2 years ago
nice device
im looking forward to buy one of those readers
bobby4500 2 years ago 2
Nice review man!
Kiriakoudisdimitris 2 years ago
Thank you for posting this great review on the Sony PRS-700.
dragonbone5000 2 years ago