I cooked Epsom earlier, and mixed it with water to see what would happen, and nothign did, but when i got bored and mixed it wit alchohol, it got almost 110*F.
Why? did i heat it to much and creat this Sulfur Trioxide biproduct? or is it normal.
we did a similar experiment in a chemistry lab class. i hate enthalpies, probably cos I wasn't listening to the teacher while she explained it :S my bad lol
Very nice one, don't worry about the results, even in the student lab at uni, errors of such dimension are quite common (they won't let us use the really expensive stuff ;))
But for suggestions concerning improvement, this comes to my mind:
-Make the ratio volume/surface as big as possible, by using bigger quantities and/or making length/height/width of the solution as similar as possible => heat exchange will be reduced
A highly conc. MgSO4 sln has a different heat capacity than H2O, but the error thereof becomes smaller on higher diln. Also, higher diln leads to less ΔT => less heat exch. And: the reaction between MgSO4 and pure H2O has another (higher) enthalpy than the reaction of MgSO4 and an already partially saturated MgSO4 sln.
On the other hand, the smaller ΔT, the higher is the relative error of the temp. measurement
=> You have to find a golden middle between the neg. effects of too high concentration and the neg. effects of the temperature measurement inaccuracies that rise with falling conc, but I have no idea on how to exactly calculate that :D
That's all I can say for now, keep up the good work!
There is actually data on heat capacities of solutions? Lol, never knew that ;) But keep in mind that the concentration is steadily changing during the dissolving process => you have to integrate, approximate etcetc... so if I did the experiment, I'd just work with lower concentration and simply calculate with the heat cpcty of H2O :D
But don't expect to get the answer exactly right unless unless you're using a professional calorimeter.
These temperature measurements are prone to small errors.
Don't use a magnetic stirrer by the way, or use it briefly, because all the energy of rotation will be transferred to the solution in the form of heat.
There is always pros and cons in using magnetic stirrer, I will try experiment with and without it to see the difference, and find a better calorimeter. Thanks for your comment in advance!
Suggestion: Use a magnetic stir bar and keep the thermometer in the solution continuously. Add the solid using weighing paper (it's slippery). The vortex created by the stir bar will keep the solid from sticking to the sides of the beaker, and you'll get more accurate results. To get the Delta-T, extrapolate the temperature before and after the addition back to t=0 (time of addition of the salt).
It is very constructive idea, I was thinking of using magnetic stirrer at first, but the cup is just too thick, so I have to find a way to do so.Thanks for your comment!
If you use the double extrapolation method to determine Delta-T, then the insulation becomes less important to the measurement, especially for small temperature changes. Just use a regular beaker.
MgSO4+C3H8O yeeuh yeeuh. did i almost kill myself or what?
Kurstd 4 months ago
I cooked Epsom earlier, and mixed it with water to see what would happen, and nothign did, but when i got bored and mixed it wit alchohol, it got almost 110*F.
Why? did i heat it to much and creat this Sulfur Trioxide biproduct? or is it normal.
just wondering it was kinda wierd but cool
Kurstd 4 months ago
@Feligatre99 You're an idiot. This is a thermochemical experiment, if he didn't cover it up, his errors would have been huge.
Tyr360 9 months ago 2
Comment removed
loljkcameron 1 year ago
i tried doing this experiment by mixing 0.1moles of CaCl2 with 100ml of water and i got no temperature change or heat released.
there was nothing wrong with the thermometer but i did use tap water
will tht make a difference?
also where did u get tht value of -104kj/mol for MgSO4
hey2008hey85 1 year ago
we did a similar experiment in a chemistry lab class. i hate enthalpies, probably cos I wasn't listening to the teacher while she explained it :S my bad lol
SumayahsIslam 1 year ago
I hate thermodynamics in general and drawing born haber cycles has been the most boring part of chemistry, apart from that everything else is ace.
SumayahsIslam 1 year ago
I did this experiment in my Chemistry lesson last week also :D
wing0304 2 years ago
Very nice video, and well presented! 5*
evansp12 2 years ago
can you try todo flame test with it?
11to 2 years ago
Do you mean to make a video about flame test?
Cforchemistry 2 years ago
yes
11to 2 years ago
Simple, but good.
Rating: 5 stars!
Zoetepasweiden 2 years ago
Good work with a very simple equipment. I like that.
bigstrontium 2 years ago
Good job mate! This video was interested and educational for me. Not exactly my field (thermodynamics) but I like your work!
cobrasniper555 2 years ago
Well done CforC
ytmachx 2 years ago
Very nice one, don't worry about the results, even in the student lab at uni, errors of such dimension are quite common (they won't let us use the really expensive stuff ;))
But for suggestions concerning improvement, this comes to my mind:
-Make the ratio volume/surface as big as possible, by using bigger quantities and/or making length/height/width of the solution as similar as possible => heat exchange will be reduced
(cont)
bla287 2 years ago
(cont)
-Use a metallic thermoelement with digital meter, they're usually smaller, faster, more accurate and take/give away less heat from the sln
(cont)
bla287 2 years ago
apparatus is really important in my case, I will try finding a better calorimeter or a digital thermometer for my next trial.Thanks for your ideas!
Cforchemistry 2 years ago
(cont)
-A more complicated issue is dilution:
A highly conc. MgSO4 sln has a different heat capacity than H2O, but the error thereof becomes smaller on higher diln. Also, higher diln leads to less ΔT => less heat exch. And: the reaction between MgSO4 and pure H2O has another (higher) enthalpy than the reaction of MgSO4 and an already partially saturated MgSO4 sln.
On the other hand, the smaller ΔT, the higher is the relative error of the temp. measurement
(cont)
bla287 2 years ago
(cont)
=> You have to find a golden middle between the neg. effects of too high concentration and the neg. effects of the temperature measurement inaccuracies that rise with falling conc, but I have no idea on how to exactly calculate that :D
That's all I can say for now, keep up the good work!
bla287 2 years ago
I had a hard day in calculating the enthalpy of it, and I look up inorganic handbook to find specific heat capacity data of MgSO4 sln.
Cforchemistry 2 years ago
There is actually data on heat capacities of solutions? Lol, never knew that ;) But keep in mind that the concentration is steadily changing during the dissolving process => you have to integrate, approximate etcetc... so if I did the experiment, I'd just work with lower concentration and simply calculate with the heat cpcty of H2O :D
bla287 2 years ago
That was definetly pretty awsome 5*
Socoolscienceshow 2 years ago
thanks
Cforchemistry 2 years ago
That's the way to do it!
But don't expect to get the answer exactly right unless unless you're using a professional calorimeter.
These temperature measurements are prone to small errors.
Don't use a magnetic stirrer by the way, or use it briefly, because all the energy of rotation will be transferred to the solution in the form of heat.
phj1990 2 years ago
There is always pros and cons in using magnetic stirrer, I will try experiment with and without it to see the difference, and find a better calorimeter. Thanks for your comment in advance!
Cforchemistry 2 years ago
Suggestion: Use a magnetic stir bar and keep the thermometer in the solution continuously. Add the solid using weighing paper (it's slippery). The vortex created by the stir bar will keep the solid from sticking to the sides of the beaker, and you'll get more accurate results. To get the Delta-T, extrapolate the temperature before and after the addition back to t=0 (time of addition of the salt).
chemdog8 2 years ago
It is very constructive idea, I was thinking of using magnetic stirrer at first, but the cup is just too thick, so I have to find a way to do so.Thanks for your comment!
Cforchemistry 2 years ago
If you use the double extrapolation method to determine Delta-T, then the insulation becomes less important to the measurement, especially for small temperature changes. Just use a regular beaker.
chemdog8 2 years ago
Nicee stuff I never really considered parallax before but now I will only read with one eye.
farhmoha 2 years ago 5
Parallax error usually mean you didn't take reading at eye level, not really necessary to read with one eye.
Cforchemistry 2 years ago
Nice:) good vid!
5*
KMnO4dalla 2 years ago 3
thanks
Cforchemistry 2 years ago