If evolution tenets were applied to the rigor of physics or engineering (e.g. radical change occurring over time at a core/essence level) then physics and engineering would be 'lawless'.
The concepts of Darwinism are so flawed, they fail basic premises. Models that cannot be applied across sciences are not sound. Models that cannot accommodate the basic premises of multiple fields of science are not sound.
Darwin would be embarrassed for those who cannot see the flaws his 'dated' theories.
"Always tough to make scientific info accessible to the lay public."
It's great that we now have the Internet. For those inclined, they can delve deeply into current science, at any level. Except for the 'hands on', you could almost get your Biology PhD online.
I predict the next generation of scientists to be more open to ID. Embarassing to proffs, they'll get the occsasional undergrad that may know more regarding the current research than they.
These items are still in your queue. please either answer them or own up to them.
1. Admit abiogenesis and TOE are distinct and you were wrong in stating THEY WERE "PRETTY MUCH" THE SAME and that you have no evidence to back up your claims.
2. Provide evidence AGAINST The theory of evolution or admit there isn't any.
I'll ask this again until you provide answers are admit you are in error. I've got all year, hope you do too...
Always tough to make scientific information accessible to the lay public. Nice job of explaining the science as well as the underlying materialistic assumptions.
If evolution tenets were applied to the rigor of physics or engineering (e.g. radical change occurring over time at a core/essence level) then physics and engineering would be 'lawless'.
The concepts of Darwinism are so flawed, they fail basic premises. Models that cannot be applied across sciences are not sound. Models that cannot accommodate the basic premises of multiple fields of science are not sound.
Darwin would be embarrassed for those who cannot see the flaws his 'dated' theories.
iknovate 3 years ago
"Always tough to make scientific info accessible to the lay public."
It's great that we now have the Internet. For those inclined, they can delve deeply into current science, at any level. Except for the 'hands on', you could almost get your Biology PhD online.
I predict the next generation of scientists to be more open to ID. Embarassing to proffs, they'll get the occsasional undergrad that may know more regarding the current research than they.
Hey, it's happening to physicians now ...
BeauLeeman 3 years ago
"I predict the next generation of scientists to be more open to ID."
Count me in.
Alternate2GOP 3 years ago
Alternate2GOP,
These items are still in your queue. please either answer them or own up to them.
1. Admit abiogenesis and TOE are distinct and you were wrong in stating THEY WERE "PRETTY MUCH" THE SAME and that you have no evidence to back up your claims.
2. Provide evidence AGAINST The theory of evolution or admit there isn't any.
I'll ask this again until you provide answers are admit you are in error. I've got all year, hope you do too...
kenthovindspimp 3 years ago
Always tough to make scientific information accessible to the lay public. Nice job of explaining the science as well as the underlying materialistic assumptions.
rbohlin 3 years ago 2