@notjam3 "The Pyramid Texts speak of "the great virgin" (Hwn.t wr.t) three times (682c, 728a, 2002a, cf. 809c)" ...
"In a text in the Abydos Temple of Seti I, Isis herself declares:
"I am the great virgin"
"The Egyptian goddess who was equally ‘the Great Virgin’ (hwnt) and ‘Mother of the God’ was the object of the very same praise bestowed upon her successor [Mary, Virgin Mother of Jesus]."
@notjam3 "The Pyramid Texts speak of "the great virgin" (Hwn.t wr.t) three times (682c, 728a, 2002a, cf. 809c)" ...
"In a text in the Abydos Temple of Seti I, Isis herself declares:
"I am the great virgin"
"The Egyptian goddess who was equally ‘the Great Virgin’ (hwnt) and ‘Mother of the God’ was the object of the very same praise bestowed upon her successor [Mary, Virgin Mother of Jesus]."
I see, so none of your Blavatsky crap worked so now you're tossing more spaghetti in hopes something will stick. If you did any research at all like you claim you'd know ZG1 only cited Blavatsky ONCE. And nothing you've said here has a damn thing to do with this video/book. You're just another Keith Trash cultist on a witch hunt.
freethoughtnation. com /forums/viewtopic. php?f=19&t=2622&start=0
Jesus and the Sun by suggesting "God's Sun = God's Son", however since I watched it again, I have not seen this. However, since I saw it, I will debunk it.
[85][86]The Hebrew word for Sun is "השמש" and the Hebrew word for Son is "בן". Hence, no relation. Although they may sound similar in English, before English was to the point it is today, the word for Son was "Sunu" [87] and the word for Sun was "Sunne", so this is why they sound similar, but they are completely different words.[88].
@zone1480 The sun/son issue was addressed long ago
freethoughtnation. com /forums/viewtopic. php?p=4835#p4835
Zeitgeist Part 1 & the Supportive Evidence
freethoughtnation. com /forums/viewtopic. php?f=19&t=2997
It's painfully obvious you know nothing about Acharya's so you're clearly not studying all sides of the issue, rather, you're just out to shore up your faith at all costs and that is as transparent as glass.
@zone1480 The sun/son issue was addressed long ago
freethoughtnation. com /forums/ viewtopic. php?p=4835#p4835
Zeitgeist Part 1 & the Supportive Evidence
freethoughtnation. com /forums/ viewtopic. php?f=19&t=2997
It's painfully obvious you know nothing about Acharya's so you're clearly not studying all sides of the issue, rather, you're just out to shore up your faith at all costs and that is as transparent as glass.
@zone1480 The sun/son issue was addressed long ago
freethoughtnation. com /forums/viewtopic. php?p=4835#p4835
Zeitgeist Part 1 & the Supportive Evidence
freethoughtnation. com /forums/viewtopic. php?f=19&t=2997
It's painfully obvious you know nothing about Acharya's so you're clearly not studying all sides of the issue, rather, you're just out to shore up your faith at all costs and that is as transparent as glass.
I am not refering to her book but Acharya is a self professed professor of theology, She contradicts herself in soiooo many ways in Zeitgeist that it wouldn;t surprise me if she got her degree from the internet.
@zone1480 of course you're "not refering to her book" because when called out, you can't substantiate your absurd claims since the book has nothing to do with Blavatsky in any way whatsoever. So, why are you posting here?
zone1480, You can repeat that lie for another 2,000 years but it will never make it true.
It's obvious you have not read this book as Acharya does not mimic Blavatsky.
As I said, it's another lie from Christian bigots attempting to shore up their faith at all costs. Try substantiating that claim with credible evidence and you'll quickly see how it falls apart very fast. And then you'll also find out who the "moron" really is too.
zone1480, You can repeat that lie for another 2,000 years but it will never make it true.
It's obvious you have not read this book as Acharya does not mimic Blavatsky.
As I said, it's another lie from Christian bigots attempting to shore up their faith at all costs. Try substantiating that claim with credible evidence and you'll quickly see how it falls apart very fast. And then you'll also find out who the "moron" really is too.
@zone1480, that's another lie from Christian bigots attempting to shore up their faith at all costs. Try substantiating that claim with credible evidence and you'll quickly see how it falls apart very fast.
@Hercules2345 Hey moron, heard of Helena Blavatsky? Acharya mimicks her exact thoughts and ideas. The problem is Helena made them over 100 years ago. Do some research before you make a stupid comment like that.
@zone1480, LMAO!!! The problem with your conspiracy theory is that there's no mention of Blavatsky in this book. Acharya does NOT mimic Blavatsky as I stated. You have clearly not read this book at all. You're just trying to smear Acharya however you can. As I said, it's another lie from Christian bigots attempting to shore up their faith at all costs. Try substantiating that claim with credible evidence and you'll quickly see how it falls apart very fast.
@zone1480 You can repeat that lie for another 2,000 years but it will never make it true.
It's obvious you have not read this book as Acharya does not mimic Blavatsky.
As I said, it's another lie from Christian bigots attempting to shore up their faith at all costs. Try substantiating that claim with credible evidence and you'll quickly see how it falls apart very fast. And then you'll also find out who the "moron" really is too.
@Hercules2345 I am the type of person to look at both sides of the story before making any rational decisions on who is right or wrong. In my opinion 'Zeitgeist' is a load of bullocks! Especially Part One, however Part Two makes more sense.The most idiotic thing Acharya does connect the Zodiac with Jesus.The history of the cross has very little to do with the zodiac, and therefore using a term such as "cross of the zodiac" is highly inaccurate at best.
@zone1480, I see, so none of your Blavatsky crap worked so now you're tossing more spaghetti in hopes something will stick. If you did any research at all like you claim you'd know ZG1 only cited Blavatsky ONCE. And nothing you've said here has a damn thing to do with this video/book. You're just another Keith Trash cultist on a witch hunt.
freethoughtnation. com /forums/viewtopic. php?f=19&t=2622&start=0
@zone1480 I see, so none of your Blavatsky crap worked so now you're tossing more spaghetti in hopes something will stick. If you did any research at all like you claim you'd know ZG1 only cited Blavatsky ONCE. And nothing you've said here has a damn thing to do with this video/book. You're just another Keith Trash cultist on a witch hunt.
freethoughtnation. com /forums/viewtopic. php?f=19&t=2622&start=0
@zone1480 I see, so none of your Blavatsky crap worked so now you're tossing more spaghetti in hopes something will stick. If you did any research at all like you claim you'd know ZG1 only cited Blavatsky ONCE. And nothing you've said here has a damn thing to do with this video/book. You're just another Keith Trash cultist on a witch hunt.
freethoughtnation. com /forums/viewtopic. php?f=19&t=2622&start=0
@zone1480 You can repeat that lie for another 2,000 years but it will never make it true.
It's obvious you have not read this book as Acharya does not mimic Blavatsky.
As I said, it's another lie from Christian bigots attempting to shore up their faith at all costs. Try substantiating that claim with credible evidence and you'll quickly see how it falls apart very fast. And then you'll also find out who the "moron" really is too.
I guess some wont appreciate this the same way do.
I bought this particular Beatles album when it 1st came out. I would, ummm, smoke my usual brand back then, & listen to this cut & just let it take me away.
This kind of Rock (Progressive Rock) was just being born. I mean, the Beatles went from "I wanna hold your hand" right into Sgt. Pepper, and Magical Mystery Tour....we all were just blown away...if U can imagine that.
This has been flagged as spam show
@notjam3 "The Pyramid Texts speak of "the great virgin" (Hwn.t wr.t) three times (682c, 728a, 2002a, cf. 809c)" ...
"In a text in the Abydos Temple of Seti I, Isis herself declares:
"I am the great virgin"
"The Egyptian goddess who was equally ‘the Great Virgin’ (hwnt) and ‘Mother of the God’ was the object of the very same praise bestowed upon her successor [Mary, Virgin Mother of Jesus]."
- Dr. Witt, an Egyptologist
- Christ in Egypt, page 152
* The Pyramid Texts are 4,400 years old
Hercules2345 5 months ago
@notjam3 "The Pyramid Texts speak of "the great virgin" (Hwn.t wr.t) three times (682c, 728a, 2002a, cf. 809c)" ...
"In a text in the Abydos Temple of Seti I, Isis herself declares:
"I am the great virgin"
"The Egyptian goddess who was equally ‘the Great Virgin’ (hwnt) and ‘Mother of the God’ was the object of the very same praise bestowed upon her successor [Mary, Virgin Mother of Jesus]."
- Dr. Witt, an Egyptologist
- Christ in Egypt, page 152
* The Pyramid Texts are 4,400 years old
Hercules2345 5 months ago
im a non stamp collecting preacher as well as having great faith in thor. i saw the movie so it must be true. thumbed up.
kram83au 7 months ago
The Bible is like most things , if you knew what it was made of , you wouldn't touch it.
TheIAMINU 9 months ago
I see, so none of your Blavatsky crap worked so now you're tossing more spaghetti in hopes something will stick. If you did any research at all like you claim you'd know ZG1 only cited Blavatsky ONCE. And nothing you've said here has a damn thing to do with this video/book. You're just another Keith Trash cultist on a witch hunt.
freethoughtnation. com /forums/viewtopic. php?f=19&t=2622&start=0
Hercules2345 1 year ago
Jesus and the Sun by suggesting "God's Sun = God's Son", however since I watched it again, I have not seen this. However, since I saw it, I will debunk it.
[85][86]The Hebrew word for Sun is "השמש" and the Hebrew word for Son is "בן". Hence, no relation. Although they may sound similar in English, before English was to the point it is today, the word for Son was "Sunu" [87] and the word for Sun was "Sunne", so this is why they sound similar, but they are completely different words.[88].
zone1480 1 year ago
@zone1480 The sun/son issue was addressed long ago
freethoughtnation. com /forums/viewtopic. php?p=4835#p4835
Zeitgeist Part 1 & the Supportive Evidence
freethoughtnation. com /forums/viewtopic. php?f=19&t=2997
It's painfully obvious you know nothing about Acharya's so you're clearly not studying all sides of the issue, rather, you're just out to shore up your faith at all costs and that is as transparent as glass.
Hercules2345 1 year ago
@zone1480 The sun/son issue was addressed long ago
freethoughtnation. com /forums/ viewtopic. php?p=4835#p4835
Zeitgeist Part 1 & the Supportive Evidence
freethoughtnation. com /forums/ viewtopic. php?f=19&t=2997
It's painfully obvious you know nothing about Acharya's so you're clearly not studying all sides of the issue, rather, you're just out to shore up your faith at all costs and that is as transparent as glass.
Hercules2345 1 year ago
@Hercules2345 Give up dude....opinions are like arseholes...
zone1480 1 year ago
@zone1480 The sun/son issue was addressed long ago
freethoughtnation. com /forums/viewtopic. php?p=4835#p4835
Zeitgeist Part 1 & the Supportive Evidence
freethoughtnation. com /forums/viewtopic. php?f=19&t=2997
It's painfully obvious you know nothing about Acharya's so you're clearly not studying all sides of the issue, rather, you're just out to shore up your faith at all costs and that is as transparent as glass.
Hercules2345 1 year ago
watch?v=vAvBP6wKKbg
zone1480 1 year ago
I am not refering to her book but Acharya is a self professed professor of theology, She contradicts herself in soiooo many ways in Zeitgeist that it wouldn;t surprise me if she got her degree from the internet.
zone1480 1 year ago
@zone1480 of course you're "not refering to her book" because when called out, you can't substantiate your absurd claims since the book has nothing to do with Blavatsky in any way whatsoever. So, why are you posting here?
Hercules2345 1 year ago
zone1480, You can repeat that lie for another 2,000 years but it will never make it true.
It's obvious you have not read this book as Acharya does not mimic Blavatsky.
As I said, it's another lie from Christian bigots attempting to shore up their faith at all costs. Try substantiating that claim with credible evidence and you'll quickly see how it falls apart very fast. And then you'll also find out who the "moron" really is too.
Hercules2345 1 year ago
zone1480, You can repeat that lie for another 2,000 years but it will never make it true.
It's obvious you have not read this book as Acharya does not mimic Blavatsky.
As I said, it's another lie from Christian bigots attempting to shore up their faith at all costs. Try substantiating that claim with credible evidence and you'll quickly see how it falls apart very fast. And then you'll also find out who the "moron" really is too.
Hercules2345 1 year ago
Acharya is part of the new age movement. An agent of the Illuminati spreading false beliefs.
zone1480 1 year ago
@zone1480, that's another lie from Christian bigots attempting to shore up their faith at all costs. Try substantiating that claim with credible evidence and you'll quickly see how it falls apart very fast.
Hercules2345 1 year ago
@Hercules2345 Hey moron, heard of Helena Blavatsky? Acharya mimicks her exact thoughts and ideas. The problem is Helena made them over 100 years ago. Do some research before you make a stupid comment like that.
zone1480 1 year ago
@zone1480, LMAO!!! The problem with your conspiracy theory is that there's no mention of Blavatsky in this book. Acharya does NOT mimic Blavatsky as I stated. You have clearly not read this book at all. You're just trying to smear Acharya however you can. As I said, it's another lie from Christian bigots attempting to shore up their faith at all costs. Try substantiating that claim with credible evidence and you'll quickly see how it falls apart very fast.
Hercules2345 1 year ago
@zone1480 You can repeat that lie for another 2,000 years but it will never make it true.
It's obvious you have not read this book as Acharya does not mimic Blavatsky.
As I said, it's another lie from Christian bigots attempting to shore up their faith at all costs. Try substantiating that claim with credible evidence and you'll quickly see how it falls apart very fast. And then you'll also find out who the "moron" really is too.
Hercules2345 1 year ago
@Hercules2345 I am the type of person to look at both sides of the story before making any rational decisions on who is right or wrong. In my opinion 'Zeitgeist' is a load of bullocks! Especially Part One, however Part Two makes more sense.The most idiotic thing Acharya does connect the Zodiac with Jesus.The history of the cross has very little to do with the zodiac, and therefore using a term such as "cross of the zodiac" is highly inaccurate at best.
zone1480 1 year ago
@zone1480, I see, so none of your Blavatsky crap worked so now you're tossing more spaghetti in hopes something will stick. If you did any research at all like you claim you'd know ZG1 only cited Blavatsky ONCE. And nothing you've said here has a damn thing to do with this video/book. You're just another Keith Trash cultist on a witch hunt.
freethoughtnation. com /forums/viewtopic. php?f=19&t=2622&start=0
Hercules2345 1 year ago
@zone1480 I see, so none of your Blavatsky crap worked so now you're tossing more spaghetti in hopes something will stick. If you did any research at all like you claim you'd know ZG1 only cited Blavatsky ONCE. And nothing you've said here has a damn thing to do with this video/book. You're just another Keith Trash cultist on a witch hunt.
freethoughtnation. com /forums/viewtopic. php?f=19&t=2622&start=0
Hercules2345 1 year ago
@zone1480 I see, so none of your Blavatsky crap worked so now you're tossing more spaghetti in hopes something will stick. If you did any research at all like you claim you'd know ZG1 only cited Blavatsky ONCE. And nothing you've said here has a damn thing to do with this video/book. You're just another Keith Trash cultist on a witch hunt.
freethoughtnation. com /forums/viewtopic. php?f=19&t=2622&start=0
Hercules2345 1 year ago
@Hercules2345 What has Christianity done to you that makes you so angry? Has it killed your mother?
zone1480 1 year ago
@zone1480 You can repeat that lie for another 2,000 years but it will never make it true.
It's obvious you have not read this book as Acharya does not mimic Blavatsky.
As I said, it's another lie from Christian bigots attempting to shore up their faith at all costs. Try substantiating that claim with credible evidence and you'll quickly see how it falls apart very fast. And then you'll also find out who the "moron" really is too.
Hercules2345 1 year ago
What is so great about this?
this is only advertising, with a terrible music by the way.
I love Acharya, though
shapein 2 years ago
space
Man, I applaud you on this one!!
I guess some wont appreciate this the same way do.
I bought this particular Beatles album when it 1st came out. I would, ummm, smoke my usual brand back then, & listen to this cut & just let it take me away.
This kind of Rock (Progressive Rock) was just being born. I mean, the Beatles went from "I wanna hold your hand" right into Sgt. Pepper, and Magical Mystery Tour....we all were just blown away...if U can imagine that.
Thank U
Then "Cream" was born...
Cootabux 2 years ago
Thanks for your interest in the vids man. Fab! :)
spaceagebachelor 2 years ago
No. Keith's way too busy raising donations to pay for his new video camera, Mac laptop, and holiday :)
spaceagebachelor 2 years ago
Awesome.
ChelevSaRa 2 years ago
really interesting subjects listed. shall look forward to her reading her thoughts on them :)
DecentralizedByGuilt 2 years ago