KJV Onlyism is perfectly defined in the YouTube video King James Follies 5. It is like taking a trip to Disney World and fawning over the sign and claiming it is the one true sign to Disney World and all other signs are plots set up by Sea World to deceive you.
She seems to just compare the KJV to all the others. What she should be doing is comparing all versions to the original Hebrew and Greek. Politics did have influence over King James as well. You can't really avoid it.
I agree. I just tried to look something up in the living Bible and it didn't make any sense at all. All the nuance was destroyed. I prefer the NRSV with notes about what was found missing or added in different authorities.
Sadly, She does not know what she is talking about in reguards to I John 5:7. There is clear and overwhelming evidence that this verse was a later addition to the transcript. (The first mention is in 358AD and none of the early church fathers mentioned it in the huge and important debate about the Trinity that consumed a huge amount of time and energy from the early church fathers. ) Please, please do a better job of research before you write things like this Dr. R.
America began in the city named after King James- meaning Jamestown, Virginia. And this is a sign. See the Aimed At America 3 video because these Scripture parallels will only manifest in the King James Bible!
@jameywcll I hope that there's a heaven, And if there is, we'll all be there, That probably there's not, doesn't make me despair, If there was a good God, there would be no hell, If there was a loving God all would turn out well, But probably God's are imaginary! A failed hypothesis! How am I going to experience anything, When I've turned back into dust? see Job 14v10-14, Eccles 3v19 Man's fate is like that of the animals; the same fate awaits them both. All have the same spirit / breath.
At best most modern translations are "artistic interpretations" of the manuscripts because they have a modern copyright. You cannot copyright facts, true stories or public information.
THAT'S FUNNY. 1:32-36 ELLEN G. WHITE SAID THE EXACT SAME THING. THE BIBLE AND THE BIBLE ONLY IS THE FINAL AUTHORITY IN ALL THINGS REGARDING FAITH AND PRACTICE. COINCIDENCE.....? ME THINKEST NOT.
13 “Enter by the narrow gate; for wide is the gate and broad is the way that leads to destruction, and there are many who go in by it. 14 Because[a] narrow is the gate and difficult is the way which leads to life, and there are few who find it.
"difficult" is very different of "narrow". Difficult implies the idea of impossibility or discouragement, while "narrow" just conveys the idea of "choice", or persistence.
You are right, I am French speaking and I used French Bible "Louis Second", it is close to KJV, and then I tried Darby, it was confusing, then Thomson in French. But in English, I began with NKJV because it was easy, but yesterday I went through some Scriptures and I realised important changes that distort the meanings...
It just amazes me. People will be shown what is truth again and again. However, they totally ignor the facts, that even a child can understand, and still insist on mixing arsnic in their coffee a spoonful at a time, instead of the pure sugar God has given them. Your "bible" is your contract, the Bride's "katuba". If you hold to "another contract" (another bible), that He did not write, then what 'you think' He will honor He will not, because He did not write it.
13Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat: 14Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it.
@simonia352 That old english is on a 4 grade level reading while the other bibles are 5 to 7 grade so its actually harder to understand the newer versions.
this woman is crazy . the bible is corrupted big time. you have matthew,mark and luke walking and talking to jesus and not one of them lived in jesus's life time.. there is no evidence outside the bible that paul ever existed .. dont listen to her , she is an agent of satan . you have to search not only the bible but extra biblical materials to get a good rounded understanding . king james was GAY . he murdered the scribes after they tranlated so no one would no what he changed or omitted .
Uh yea, you do realize that John 1 is a copy of the Hindu Vedas right? Comon man, free your mind from the churches dogma and nonsense and begin to study these things!
@bigritchie John 1:1 In (Genisis) the beginning... refers to Genisis 1:1, God is translated from the word Eloheem which is the plural form of Eloah(El) whech is the Hebrew word for Almighty. does the vegas refer to Gen 1:1 also?
@bigritchie The law is given for our good. I have a multiunit building with my brother. the number one reason I have to evict somone is because they used their rent money to buy drugs or alcohol. Over 90% of the time that is the case. Love fulfils the Law. 1Cor 13
Prof. Gale Riplinger has an awesome video titled New Age Bible Versions. It's one of the most comprehensive & well researched videos on this topic of modern bibles that are increasingly showing their New Age affiliation. Particularly the NIV, nicknamed the New Illuminati Version. It's not yet over compromised though but it's progression from one revision to another keeps taking Jesus out & getting more lukewarm. Those with an ear take heed. Time to get back to KJV, fast.
The Complete Jewish Bible and the Aramaic English New Testament are considerably more accurate than the KJV. I like the KJV, but it is not, by any means, the most accurate.
1 John 5:7 is actually not in the original text. Nor, is the end of Luke 4:4. It is a reference to Deut 8:3, where the entire sentence does appear.
@BereanBeacon1 I have always recognized some failures in the KJV. It was the best we could get from 400 years ago, but many scholars have taken the time to get much better translations. I am NOT a fan of many modern versions. They do not have the cultural background to speak to specific idiomatic issues. When I have really want to know the true meaning I seldom rely on KJV to give the best view. I still read it, because I am used to it. But, I look to better sources for in-depth understanding.
The bit about computers and "maybe our names are written in the Bible" is quite telling. Even if this doesn't immediately strike you as nuts, it happens to amount to an attack on any non-Hebrew version.
A majority of Christians I know wonder why I only study, read and quote the KJV of the Bible. Go figure? You can't dispute what she said in this video. Thanks for sharing this!
i read that jesus name was translated from a sun god which is also connected to satanit comes from zeus and many other gods and jupitar also lucifer . where can people get a bible thats translated right from hebrew
@BereanBeacon1 You can't buy the 1611 KJV in any shops. It got revised before taking the form it has now. Apparently there were spelling and printing errors.
@Brightfame73 Continued - "With the exception of typographical errors and changes required by the process of orthography [spelling] in the English language, the text of our present Bibles remains unchanged, and without variations from the original copy as left by the translators. (Report of the Committee on Versions to the Board of Managers of the American Bible Society, 1852, pp. 7,11 as cited by George T. Crabb)
@Brightfame73 There are three changes to the KJV since 1611.
1. 1612: Typography ( from Gothic to Roman type).
2. 1629 & 1638: Correction of typographical errors.
3. 1762 & 1769: Standardization of spelling. The 'Board of Managers' of the American Bible Society in 1852 determined that "The English Bible as left by the translators has come down to us unaltered in respect to its text..."
You guys realize that this woman is a 3 time divorcee. She does not speak one word of ANY of the Biblical languages and has a degree in HOME ECONOMICS right? I am sure she can give you some great cleaning soap advice, but I would ignore her utter nonsense about the "KJV" Bible.
Ima bout to buy me a King James version! I got NLT its a good version but I want the fullness of Gods Word in full effect as I can get it. Ill use the NLT for simpler speech when needed but ima stay in the Word! Glad I got to watch this :)
Suppose this lady who presented some facts of our times regarding false prophets and openly displaying how some have corrupted the holy book - she has been watchful, was it not said to be watchful, vigilant? at least she will tell her students to stay away from newer doctrines-to infiltrate the minds and hearts. though enough damage has been done. children get abnormal, crazy when words are being replaced or omitted another study proved. buy a facsimile of the 1611 kjv in old letter type not new
Some really ignorant, hateful comments have come to me lately.
If the people who wrote them had studied enough to know what they are talking about, instead of pushing propaganda, and repeating teachings like parrots, they wouldn't have said these things.
One suggested read is "Misquoting Jesus".
To be clear, if you think any version of the Bible 100% right/correct, your wrong.
The king james is one of the the worst versions you could possibly use. It was translated using lower quality inferior manuscripts. Other versions like NSRV go back to the oldest known manuscripts. Although to be honest, in my opinion it really makes little difference in my opinion, unless you are a literalistic fundamentalist. This topic is far larger than this and not at all simple.
@TheMessanjah Muslims welcome your position on the translation issue, as they use the commentaries and modern translations to prove that Christians don't have the words of God as they do in the Quran. Cults also agree with you because they have multiple authorities and can point out the errors in the modern translations to attack the KJV.
Perhaps you are missing the point: Moslems, who are lost and blind to the Gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ, easily understand that God can preserve what He wants to preserve without error--unlike you evidently since the Holy Scriptures instruct the sound Biblical doctrine of the preservation of the Old Testament and the New Testament in their entirety.
In English, by the way, the Holy Scriptures are commonly called the King James Bible.
Obadiah 1:1 in the King James version: "(...)an ambassador is sent among the heathen..." Here's the same part in the English Revised Version (1885): "an ambassador is sent among the nations". Since so many corrections had to made due to new findings in words' meanings, how can you say the Authorized Version has the most accurate translation in all verses?
As boggymark1 put is so succinctly, "you…missed the point. Scrivener's authoritative recension of the Received Text confirms the complete accuracy of the New Testament as it is found in the King James Bible. Moreover, the perfect translation of the Old Testament into English in the AV1611 is attested by Jacob ben Hayyim's Masoretic Text. No error, omission or addition in the Scritural text of the Authorized Version of the Holy Bible (KJV) has ever been proven."
2. 1629 & 1638: Correction of typographical errors.
3. 1762 & 1769: Standardization of spelling. The 'Board of Managers' of the American Bible Society in 1852 determined that "The English Bible as left by the translators has come down to us unaltered in respect to its text..."
@LDSfaithDefender Continued - "With the exception of typographical errors and changes required by the process of orthography [spelling] in the English language, the text of our present Bibles remains unchanged, and without variations from the original copy as left by the translators. (Report of the Committee on Versions to the Board of Managers of the American Bible Society, 1852, pp. 7,11 as cited by George T. Crabb)
Obadiah 1:1 in the King James version: "(...)an ambassador is sent among the heathen..." Here's the same part of that verse in the English Revised Version, made in 1885: "an ambassador is sent among the nations"
In all, tons of corrections had to made due to new findings in words' meanings centuries after the Authorized Version: surely, you can't say the Authorized Version has the most accurate translation in all verses!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
However he was a real hit and remains so for the majority of commons who approach the cross before they approach the scriptures in any signifigant manner. Emmotionally desperate and scripturally retarded they are willing to believe anything they are told. The best ?worst part of this formula is that the puking up of his dirty little sins is what truely glues him to the church. With a clear conscience he feels a great weight has been lifted and he starts to feel comforted, CALLING IT SPIRIT!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Funny how she equates the word 'WORD' WITH 'KING JAMES BIBLE'. 'Thou' isnt refering to God. What an airhead. You dips believe FIRST than look for support in the scriptures. Youre studying backwards. Its not that you think youre right, but rather you couldnt survive let alone CONSIDER the possibility of being wrong. And any one that objects to what you live in your head must be from the devil. Its a Joke. YOU CAN KEEP ALL YOUR TRANSLATIONS.
She Leaves out the Part that the King James bible has profanity in it. Look in the Book of 1 Samuel chapter 22 where the word Piss is used. also in first kings Man is known for Pissing on the wall. Also in the New Testament Ass is used Several Times. Bastard is used alot in the King James. And people Label this as the word of God? I Don't think so. the Hcsb bible does not have profanity in it. I Also use the NLT Bible. She also does not tell you King James was a well Known freemason
The fact is that no one without exception who has argued against the King James Bible has been able to defend his own mistranslations into English in a public forum for any significant length of time because they (like you in this case) only regurgitate sophistries and transparent propaganda favored by Alexandrian cultists, atheists, crackpot advocates of Scientology, etc.
This lady is not arguing whether or not the BIble itself is true, she is arguing specifically, that among the many books calling themselves Bibles there is a supremacy of texts. If one was to read one or the other the best of the options is the King James Version. That is the only point being made here.
They are clams the New Age movement is a non-religious spiritual movement that developed in the latter half of the 20th century. It's not true....they make jesus look smaller and less important and changing Word of God easiest vey to do it...Don't Be Deceived! "As you have therefore received Christ Jesus the Lord, so walk in Him, rooted and built up in Him and established in the faith, ...
Even Caiaphas, a conspirator to the unjust trial and crucifixion of Jesus of Nazareth, the Son of God, the Messiah, prophesied, and not one verse of Scripture will pass away (in fact, not a word) according to the Saviour Himself. God--not man--preserves the Holy Scriptures, His own inspired words in their entirety. In English, they are called the King James Bible.
You got nothing, and that's all that Darwinism ever had to offer: no proof, to be sure, only a laughable and superficial theory supported by more myth and misinformation promoted by the ranks of obscurantists where atheists characteristically have been found in the vanguard.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@jjpetkusiii All you have is your bronze age doctrine myth. The rest of humanity can draw from science, progress, an ever increased understanding, discoveries, and all the rest of it.
Evolution has been proven, period. You can lie and distort and make things up till you're blue in the face, your attempts to discredit these incredible amounts of data is absolutely pathetic.
No, not at all, and the "bottom line" is this: Darwin's theory of evolution has never been proven by the scientific method. Moreover, it contradicts laws of empirical science which have been proven, notably thermodynamics, and "evolution" is inherently flawed as an hypothesis for a variety of reasons.
Free of errors, omissions, and additions as an irrefutable fact, however, the King James Bible is the Holy Scriptures, preserved by the LORD and verbally inerrant in English.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@jjpetkusiii You're lying *AGAIN*. Evolution has been proven in many ways.
evolution(dot)berkeley(dot)edu
"What is the evidence for evolution"
"Lines of evidence"
"Fossil evidence"
"Homologies"
"Distribution in time and space"
"Evidence by example"
Your bible has plenty of errors. For one, there wasn't any world wide flood. There was no talking snake. The list of crap from that book goes on and on and on.
Also check out evilbible(dot)com to show your "god" is quite the little psychopath.
Apparently, you never tire of posting superficial double talk since the object of your scribblings here is obviously to promote your faithless variety of ungodliness by any means at your disposal no matter how patently ludicrous. "Homologies" is just another word for "analogies" which have never constituted empirical evidence of any scientific theory, and of course, they do not constitute a proof of Darwinism any more than the rest of your transparent sophistry does.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@jjpetkusiii Sure it has been proven. There are various different forms of evidence that all lead to the same conclusion. Just because it doesn't look like it's happening right in front of your eyes, does not mean it doesn't exist. Check out evolution(dot)berkeley(dot)edu which is a good starting point showing various forms of evidence.
You WANT it to be false, but you don't have one single argument against it, other than you hate it.
No, what you cited and posted here is insufficient and unnecessary to establish the empirical proof of any "theory of evolution." You just flatter yourself to the point where it is nauseating to any alert reader who happens to stumble across your convoluted drivel.
For the English-speaking people, however the King James Bible is the Holy Scriptures, preserved by the LORD and free of errors, omissions, and additions as an irrefutable matter of historical fact.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@jjpetkusiii By the way, I'm pretty sure that you are h2omanz. Just one little coincidence too many. You should have spaced out your commenting on the two videos where we're arguing a little better to prevent getting discovered.
I'm not sure that you are a paranoid schizophrenic even though you write like one. After all, many inveterate obscurantists suffer from delusions brought on by manic depression, alcoholism, drug abuse, etc.
Your clearly vain cavilling, on the other hand, is hardly a coincidence according to the Holy Scriptures.
"And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil" (John 3:16).
No one (e.g., an incessant obscurantist like you) in history, however, has never proven a single linguistic or historical fact that refutes the plenary verbal inerrancy of the King James Bible in fully legible English today.
No, the fact of the matter is that Darwinism is absolutely indefensible, front "to back, left to right, inside out" by anyone (e.g., an illogical atheist like you) because the "theory of evolution" remains a failed hypothesis more than a century after the death of the Victorian crank who postulated it.
For the English-speaking peoples, however, the King James Bible is the Holy Scriptures, preserved by the LORD and free of errors, omissions, and additions as an irrefutable fact.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@jjpetkusiii What is "Darwinism"? Darwin was just a guy that was trying to make sense of life on earth. There's no such thing as "Darwinism". You're desperately looking for labels to use for your pathetic little propaganda campaigns. But noone is listening. Any of the crap you're barfing up isn't changing the world in any way.
I'm *very* logical. I go by science, evidence, knowledge, proof, etc. You are going on faith, the process of non-thinking. So it's clearly YOU that's illogical.
As LBBspock wrote, "There is a blindness upon all of you Bible...rejectors. It is reminiscent of profesing Christians who supported Obama for President. When you people are presented with facts and truths that unequivocally prove the A.V. is perfect you resort to denial and obtuseness. A person can read a Bible tract and get saved, that does not make the Bible tract the word of God. However, to grow properly you need the sincere milk and meat that only the A.V. can supply."
The Holy Scriptures have been preserved by God Himself, and they were translated into English without error, omission, or addition in 1611. Since that time, manuscript evidence has established that the text of the King James Bible derives from Antioch--where the disciples were first called Christians--chiefly down the Byzantine line, and therefore comes from the pure Biblical texts. Moreover, valid hermeneutic methology and sound Biblical doctrine and are not matters of debate
As jnest 55 wrote, "Remember also that the first thing that the devil attacked was God's Word. In the Garden, God told Adam and Eve "In the day that ye eat of it ye shall surely die"; then the devil came and first, questioned what God had said- "hast God said ye shall not eat of EVERY tree of the garden?"-- and then openly contradicted God's word --"ye shall not surely die". It has been the devils plan all along to attack God's Word."
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@jjpetkusiii Why? You do keep copy-pasting that same James King this and Jame King that crap. You don't have anything to say outside your little Bible. You are so far gone it just isn't funny. Reality outside the confines of your Bible simply isn't real to you.
Popish ideologues, crypto-Romanist ideologues, and witless skeptics like you love to whine and cry foul whenever their hideous betrayals are unmasked. Judas hanged himself but he is still the son of perditon, and his suicide did not save him.
For the English-speaking peoples, however, the King James Bible is the Holy Scriptures, preserved by the LORD and free of errors, omissions, and additions as an irrefutable matter of historical fact.
As Providential 1611 wrote, "Catholicism…LITERALLY cut off men heads, limbs, tongues, babies out of pregnant women, etc. Rome hates the King James Bible because it is OF GOD and exposes Rome for the cult it is. The Bible teaches us not to walk with heretics anyway, but to expose, mark, note and shun them. What you view as cultic and sectarian is simply Biblical obedience to be separate from idolaters, greedy people and peddlers of another Gospel."
You should try reading something other than jesuitical propaganda, swill from the gutter by atheist activists and their hack supporters, or the works of Calvinistic ideologues who substitute their own neo-Augustinian rhetoric for valid hermeneutic methodology.
Neither any Vatican operative, nor caviling Calvinist, nor you, nor any other skeptical eisegete has ever proven even a single linguistic or historical fact that refutes the verbal inerrancy of the King James Bible in English.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@jjpetkusiii Practically every claim it makes has been disproven. The flood never was, Adam & Eve never were, noone reached the age of 600 or past 1000 even, the earth was not created in six days, a tower had nothing to do with the fact that people speak different languages, and the list goes on and on and on.
That little bible is so absolutely over the top pathetic, it just aint funny! I don't care which translation you're into.
As jjpetkusiii put it, "Rational discourse is not the last wrinkle on Calvin Klein's spring runway, hoser.
"Either a premise is true or false, and the overwhelming majority of yours (barely discernible for their convoluted rhetoric) fit the latter category."
I don't want to dispute your dubious opinions and clearly vulgar preferences, but the King James Bible is the Holy Scriptures, peserved by the LORD and verbally inerrant in English as an irrefutable matter of historical fact.
No one can honestly deny that your posts are riddled with a number of apparently eccentric themes, and as jsjsonify put it so succinctly, "…we're no more evolved from apes then we are from a hyena. Science is always catching up 2 the Bible. U say faith is non-thinking but sounds like u just believe what the "world" tells u! Full of holes if u stop & listen. & every1 who has the Holy Spirit is of the same person but u just sound like a paranoid schizoid!"
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@jjpetkusiii We'll leave the judging to others. I'm not worried for a split second. That you wish to believe in a god, fine. But for you to pretend that science is wrong about just about everything, and that instead all the answers are in a book written by a few people thousands of years ago, THAT truly is LUDICROUS!
The big problem with you people is that you are fighting and going against science. You are, in effect, being stupid and crazy!
"Doth God pervert judgment? or doth the Almighty pervert justice?" (Job 8:3).
"Behold, God will not cast away a perfect man, neither will he help the evil doers" (Job 8:20).
No one (e.g., a skeptic who attempts to wrest the Scriptures like you) in history has ever proven even one historical or linguistic fact that refutes the plenary verbal inerrancy of the King James Bible in fully legible English today, which is the lingua franca of our contemporary world.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@jjpetkusiii You have to understand. The moment I notice any of this Job 1:2 and other references to verses, my eyes glance over it and I don't read it. And that is because I think the Bible is full of shit. A bunch of manipulative stuff to control your mind. There is something about when an assertive seemingly authoritative statement is made, that seems to grab hold of people. It goes for things other than religion as well. It is why people are impressionable and controllable.
"First of all," as IBelieveMyBible wrote, "your premise is erroneous. We are not KJVonlyist. It is simply because we believe our Bible in its entirety and those who prefer the NIV, NASV etc. dont believe their bible completely that we are despised and thus in an effort to devide we are called KJVonlyists." Of course, Darwinism is totally wacko, as irrational as a UFO aficionados' convention on a landfill in Hoboken, New Jersey after high tea before noon at Harrod's.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@jjpetkusiii It's similar to when a parents gives a lecture. Or how when you get an angry statement from a government. Or when something serious happens and you're watching the news.
It doesn't work with me. I always have my spidy senses out and refuse to let my mind be controlled.
Critical and independent thinking is a quality that needs to be learned early on.
You religious people do the opposite. You teach your children to become susceptible to mind control.
Unlike historical and linguistic ignoramuses, Christians who know that the King James Bible is the Holy Scriptures, preserved by the LORD usually understand many things. For example, atheism is a conversation piece for solipsists who cannot handle the axiomatic reality of God's existence because the guilty awareness that they will be judged by their Eternal Creator displeases them. "The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth His handywork" (Psalm 19:1).
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@jjpetkusiii The world looks completely different when you think independently. It means having to make choices and understanding the impact of decisions. You take on life differently. You wrap yourself in this delusional goo of religious ooze. Even though nothing is really there, you have the impression that some sort of authority, some sort of loving uber parent, is watching and guiding you.
You'll have to overlook when it fails you of course.
"Even the righteousness of God which is by faith of Jesus Christ unto all and upon all them that believe: for there is no difference: For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God; Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus: Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God" (Romans 3:22).
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@jjpetkusiii It might be better for some to relinquish their mind to religion, because without it, they simply can not cut it. Life is too harsh, and the world demands too much. What better way, than to turn off your mind, and let a community invite you in their ooze of gooey mystical bliss. Something you feel is beyond you, but somehow is your friend. Churches know this, and totally take advantage of this - it is how they got started.
It is how and why the Bible was constructed. Mind control.
As jondabil wrote, "God preserved the 'very words' God spoke? Where?...Enlighten my 'vast' ignorance. Tell me which text that YOU have in Greek that is EXACTLY the same as the originals, and don't tell me "THE Greek text," because there are over 27 of them and over 5,000 Greek manuscripts. Also, tell me, was the TRANSLATION in the original of Moses and Pharoah's conversation from Egyptian to Hebrew preserved?"
No error in the King James Bible has ever been proven by anyone (e.g., you).
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@jjpetkusiii Thera are lots of errors in the Bible. Like that flood that never happened. And how languages weren't the result of people building a high tower at all. Splitting of the Red Sea never happened. There was no Adam & Eve and there was no talking snake.
The list goes on and on. And you're trying to claim "accuracy". Lol and lol!
Those are not examples of "errors" anywhere in the Scriptural text of the King James Bible. On the other hand, your terrified reluctance or retarded inability to accept the reality of miracles does not constitute and has never proven any mistake on the part of the Lord God omnipotent.
Verbally inerrant as an irrefutable matter of historical fact, the King James Bible is the Holy Scriptures, preserved by the LORD, in English today, which is the lingua franca of our contemorary world.
@a1mint Before 500 B.C. the Daniel proclaimed that Israel's long-awaited Messiah would begin his public ministry 483 years after the issuing of a decree to restore and rebuild Jerusalem (Daniel 9:25-26). He further predicted that the Messiah would be "cut off," killed, and that this event would take place prior to a second destruction of Jerusalem. Abundant documentation shows that these prophecies were perfectly fulfilled in the life (and crucifixion) of Jesus Christ.
@a1mint Now you need to inform us what country will attack what country, from what direction, their motivation for initiating the attack, who will be the allies of each side, how long the battle will last, then if the losing nation will recover. Your time starrrrrts----NOW!
The Holy Bible is also quite clear about unbelief during the Great Apostasy even as we can see it today.
"But, beloved, remember ye the words which were spoken before of the apostles of our Lord Jesus Christ; How that they told you there should be mockers in the last time, who should walk after their own ungodly lusts" (Jude 1:17ff).
"For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water"
@a1mint In approximately 700 B.C. the prophet Micah named the tiny village of Bethlehem as the birthplace of Israel's Messiah (Micah 5:2). The fulfillment of this prophecy in the birth of Christ is one of the most widely known and widely celebrated facts in history.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@filoIII Stories upon stories. And there isn't even any real solid evidence that this "Messiah" Jesus ever even existed. Things didn't get written about him decades after his alleged death. Knowing how superstitious people are now and especially back then, the further you go back to crazier people were, it's far more plausible that it's all just stories. There is the matter of that missing evidence.
I can offer some much more plausible evidence: evolution.
@a1mint Do you believe Aristotle existed? Be careful of your answer, cause you're on the verge of being made to look like a fool, and it'll be of your own doing.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@filoIII Let's get one thing straight here. I am not the one that is looking like a fool. The ones looking like a fool are the ones constantly quoting verses from the Bible. The ones contradicting science and facts. The ones that are clearly delusional. The ones that pretend that information that contradicts their doctrine, does not exist or is automatically invalid.
End of day, faith is the process of non-thinking. Are you one of those?
Some of us have seen the foggy content of your rubbish in a variety of illogical forms at all sorts of venues published in several languages but never very cogently.
Free of errors, omissions, and additions as an irrefutable matter of historical fact in any case, the King James Bible is the Holy Scriptures, preserved by the LORD, in fully legible English today, which is the lingua franca of our contemporary world.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@jjpetkusiii It is *YOU* that doesn't think. Faith is the process of non-thinking. What YOU are barfing up is rubbish, because it is YOU that keeps quoting stories from thousands of years ago.
Free of errors my ass. That flood never happen, so that's an error right there. There was no Ade & Eve.
I never met your donkey, but he (or she) in all his inerrant perfection belongs to an owner who failed to prove any of your assertions here.
Indeed, no one (e.g., an illogical promoter of Darwinism like you) in history has ever proven the "theory of evolution" or even a single historical or linguistic fact that refutes the plenary verbal inerrancy of the King James Bible, which is the Holy Scriptures, preserved by the LORD, and therefore the final authority in all matters in English.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@jjpetkusiii The Bible is a set of stories written by a bunch of superstitious people thousands of years ago, created to manipulate and control people.
Science is the process of proving and gaining knowledge and understanding through evidence and examinations. It is a process that improves all the time.
Evolution is one of many things that are support by enough evidence where it has become unreasonable to deny it.
One thing is for damn well sure: you are *NOT* the rational thinking one here!
Thank you for your prompt and characteristically illogical reply, but your empty rhetoric does not constitute any proof whatsoever of your revamped bronze age myths of "evolution" ex nihilo which also lacks empirical evidence according to the scientific method in every language.
Free of errors, omissions, and additions as an irrefutable matter of historical fact, on the other hand, the King James Bible is the Holy Scriptures, preserved by the LORD, in fully legible English today.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@jjpetkusiii Not empty at all. It is the logical conclusion. Stories that completely contradict science left and right, leads to that logical conclusion.
You are entirely and completely full of utter SHIT.
Your inability to reconcile your Darwinist pipedreams with the factual proof of thermodynamics as empirical science is your problem, but certainly not that of anyone who believes the King James Bible, which is the Holy Scriptures, preserved by the LORD, as an irrefutable matter of historical fact.
Nothing that you have posted here is even worth consideration by anyone who actually knows what the word "science" (i.e., knowledge, the antithesis of your ignorance) means.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@jjpetkusiii You keep repeating the same garbage over and over and over. Again, Darwin was a scientist that tried to make sense of life on earth. Many other people have taken this to a far greater extend.
And again, the Bible is full of shit, because it's full of stories that could not have happened, and it completely contradicts everything we KNOW is real.
Yes, it's really quite simple: ignorant vulgarian that your are, you nonetheless want to revive Theater of the Absurd all by yourself. There may be other irrational reasons for your posts, but that would be the most benign.
For the English-speaking peoples in any case, the King James Bible is the Holy Scriptures, preserved by the LORD and verbally inerrant in fully legible English today.
Of course, no vulgarian or any other skeptical eisegete in history has ever proven even one historical or linguistic fact that refutes the plenary verbal inerrancy of the King James Bible in fully legible English today, which is the lingua franca of our contemporary world. The Holy Scriptures, given by inspiration, inerrant, infallible, and preserved by the LORD, are the only reliable final authority in all matters.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@jjpetkusiii What's more stupid and ignorant? Blindly believing and defending stories from thousands of years ago, without questioning it, or, following the scientific process and what it reveals. Like the various dating techniques that reveal how old fossils are?
It's not just that you're ignorant, you choose to avoid anything that contradicts with your doctrine. You are in effect, being completely stupid by choice.
As boggymark1 wrote, "I don't want to dispute your dubious opinions and clearly vulgar preferences, but the King James Bible is the Holy Scriptures, preserved by the LORD and verbally inerrant in English as an irrefutable matter of historical fact."
Your posts merely reveal that you are also an obscurantist prone to whining. You have not proved any error in the text of the King James Bible because God created the species as distinct--every one of them. Taxonomy by contemporary standards has little relevance to the designations of the kinds of animal life that are cited in the Holy Scriptures, and those terms are entirely appropriate and rational in their context.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@jjpetkusiii we've already mutually debunked the flood. That means there is at least one leak in that bible. The tower of babel is not responsible for the start of multiple languages, because we all know that languages develop on their own. So that's two leaks.
There was no talking snake, three leaks.
The list goes on and on. The Bible is clearly full of crap.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@jjpetkusiii Evolution is a theory that is backed by a very large amount of evidence. Pretending it's not real demonstrates that you willfully close your eyes and decide that science doesn't exist.
That's exactly how people thought in the olden days. You are in effect, stuck in the olden days.
Antiquated, outdated, ignorant, dumb, and stupid, amongst other things. Sociopath fits you quite nicely as well.
Verbally inerrant as a matter of irrefutable fact, the King James Bible is the Holy Scriptures in English, which is the lingua franca of our contemporary world.
As boggymark1 wrote, "...you consistently missed the point. Scrivener's authoritative recension of the Received Text confirms the complete accuracy of the New Testament as it is found in the King James Bible. Moreover, the perfect translation of the Old Testament into English in the AV1611 is attested by Jacob ben Hayyim's Masoretic Text. No error, omission or addition in the Scritural text of the Authorized Version of the Holy Bible (KJV) has ever been proven"
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@jjpetkusiii YOU consistently miss the point. The Bible has a lot of stuff in it that is incorrect. Just about any claim it makes about the the earth and life on it, is flat out false.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@jjpetkusiii No what? YES. The Bible *IS* full of stuff that is incorrect. You can deny that till you're blue in the face. But that fact isn't going to go away.
While Gentile infidels like you have very little interest in learning how to read English in context like rational adults as a rule, the Holy Scriptures are very clear to regenerated believers in the Lord Jesus Christ.
"And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his name JESUS: for he shall save his people from their sins" (Matthew 1:21).
No one in history, by the way, has ever presented a single historical or linguistic fact that disproves the King James Bible in English.
Of course, no one is ever required to comment on your illogical poppycock that contradicts proven laws of empirical science, or obliged to answer your foolish and unlearned questions, but thanks for asking anyway.
Free of errors, omissions and additions as an irrefutable matter of historical fact, the King James Bible is the Holy Scriptures in fully legible English today, which is the lingua franca of our contemporary world, and it is therefore the final authority in all matters.
Actually, your unscientific Darwinist myth and jesuitical sophistries contrary to Holy Scriptures are just a bit of an oddball spin on the dogma of Rome, the great whore according to Revelation 17 and Revelation 18. Just as the Vatican supported Hitler's rise to power, so the Roman Curia connives at neo-Nazism today.
hey my lady you talk only craps over there why you don't speak about Psalms 83.18? where name of god ?
raitasorin 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
KJV Onlyism is perfectly defined in the YouTube video King James Follies 5. It is like taking a trip to Disney World and fawning over the sign and claiming it is the one true sign to Disney World and all other signs are plots set up by Sea World to deceive you.
davegooley 1 week ago
Gail is a space cadet...no academic credibility whatsoever.
prairiemark 3 weeks ago
She seems to just compare the KJV to all the others. What she should be doing is comparing all versions to the original Hebrew and Greek. Politics did have influence over King James as well. You can't really avoid it.
joshuadc82 1 month ago
I agree. I just tried to look something up in the living Bible and it didn't make any sense at all. All the nuance was destroyed. I prefer the NRSV with notes about what was found missing or added in different authorities.
joshuadc82 1 month ago
Sadly, She does not know what she is talking about in reguards to I John 5:7. There is clear and overwhelming evidence that this verse was a later addition to the transcript. (The first mention is in 358AD and none of the early church fathers mentioned it in the huge and important debate about the Trinity that consumed a huge amount of time and energy from the early church fathers. ) Please, please do a better job of research before you write things like this Dr. R.
pastormarkm 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
America began in the city named after King James- meaning Jamestown, Virginia. And this is a sign. See the Aimed At America 3 video because these Scripture parallels will only manifest in the King James Bible!
vincent15641 2 months ago
the bible is true because it says in the bible it is true.
circular reasoning by definition.
noah got drunk and naked right after he got back then he blamed his son for
his stupidity. i guess this is true.
dueteronomy come on now... 14.21 if you find anything already dead dont eat it
but you can give it to your neighbor or sell it to a foriegner... i guess this is true
thou shalt not kill... except genocide when everyone was supposedly killed with a so called flood... i guess this is true
wtf!!
jameywcll 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jameywcll I hope that there's a heaven, And if there is, we'll all be there, That probably there's not, doesn't make me despair, If there was a good God, there would be no hell, If there was a loving God all would turn out well, But probably God's are imaginary! A failed hypothesis! How am I going to experience anything, When I've turned back into dust? see Job 14v10-14, Eccles 3v19 Man's fate is like that of the animals; the same fate awaits them both. All have the same spirit / breath.
zytigon 2 months ago
At best most modern translations are "artistic interpretations" of the manuscripts because they have a modern copyright. You cannot copyright facts, true stories or public information.
gsschoenfeld 2 months ago
THAT'S FUNNY. 1:32-36 ELLEN G. WHITE SAID THE EXACT SAME THING. THE BIBLE AND THE BIBLE ONLY IS THE FINAL AUTHORITY IN ALL THINGS REGARDING FAITH AND PRACTICE. COINCIDENCE.....? ME THINKEST NOT.
FreakZilla34 2 months ago
@joekidd33
N3
NKJV
13 “Enter by the narrow gate; for wide is the gate and broad is the way that leads to destruction, and there are many who go in by it. 14 Because[a] narrow is the gate and difficult is the way which leads to life, and there are few who find it.
"difficult" is very different of "narrow". Difficult implies the idea of impossibility or discouragement, while "narrow" just conveys the idea of "choice", or persistence.
Thanks for opening my eyes.
simonia352 3 months ago
@joekidd33
N1
You are right, I am French speaking and I used French Bible "Louis Second", it is close to KJV, and then I tried Darby, it was confusing, then Thomson in French. But in English, I began with NKJV because it was easy, but yesterday I went through some Scriptures and I realised important changes that distort the meanings...
simonia352 3 months ago
It just amazes me. People will be shown what is truth again and again. However, they totally ignor the facts, that even a child can understand, and still insist on mixing arsnic in their coffee a spoonful at a time, instead of the pure sugar God has given them. Your "bible" is your contract, the Bride's "katuba". If you hold to "another contract" (another bible), that He did not write, then what 'you think' He will honor He will not, because He did not write it.
debieblue 3 months ago
Maybe there are many types of NKJ B. because mine does not have what she is talking about, neither the satanic logo.
It is difficult for Christians who do not feel comfortable with the old English of the KJ B.
simonia352 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@simonia352
N2
Matt 7:13-14
KJV :
13Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat: 14Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it.
d there are few who find it.
and ....
simonia352 3 months ago
@simonia352 That old english is on a 4 grade level reading while the other bibles are 5 to 7 grade so its actually harder to understand the newer versions.
notleftbehind 2 months ago
this woman is crazy . the bible is corrupted big time. you have matthew,mark and luke walking and talking to jesus and not one of them lived in jesus's life time.. there is no evidence outside the bible that paul ever existed .. dont listen to her , she is an agent of satan . you have to search not only the bible but extra biblical materials to get a good rounded understanding . king james was GAY . he murdered the scribes after they tranlated so no one would no what he changed or omitted .
MyIpsofacto 3 months ago
Mathew 17:21, some manuscripts do not include this verse. So much for research.
2Ti 3:16 All Scripture is God-breathed and profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness,
2Ti 3:17 so that the man of God may be perfected, being fully furnished for every good work.
does the NWT exclude John Ch1 (v.1-51) which is John's testimony of the divinity of Christ?
suggesttwo 4 months ago
@suggesttwo
Uh yea, you do realize that John 1 is a copy of the Hindu Vedas right? Comon man, free your mind from the churches dogma and nonsense and begin to study these things!
bigritchie 3 months ago
@bigritchie John 1:1 In (Genisis) the beginning... refers to Genisis 1:1, God is translated from the word Eloheem which is the plural form of Eloah(El) whech is the Hebrew word for Almighty. does the vegas refer to Gen 1:1 also?
suggesttwo 3 months ago
@bigritchie The law is given for our good. I have a multiunit building with my brother. the number one reason I have to evict somone is because they used their rent money to buy drugs or alcohol. Over 90% of the time that is the case. Love fulfils the Law. 1Cor 13
suggesttwo 3 months ago
@uwjco yes that scripture is aimed at jerusalem after the babylonians burnt it scriptures in galatians point at today
1917Kenny 4 months ago
Prof. Gale Riplinger has an awesome video titled New Age Bible Versions. It's one of the most comprehensive & well researched videos on this topic of modern bibles that are increasingly showing their New Age affiliation. Particularly the NIV, nicknamed the New Illuminati Version. It's not yet over compromised though but it's progression from one revision to another keeps taking Jesus out & getting more lukewarm. Those with an ear take heed. Time to get back to KJV, fast.
jesuswork 5 months ago
@jesuswork Are Modern Translations Trustworthy Play List? - h t t p://w w wDOTyoutubeDOTcom/view_play_list?p=CFD8DC47E427831E
Will Kinney Defends the KJB Play List
h t t p://w w wDOTyoutubeDOTcom/playlist?list=PL16B2149EE5E54979
Articles: h t t p://brandpluckedDOTwebsDOTcom/articlesDOThtm
whichversion@yahoogroupsDOTcom
Forum
h t t p://groupsDOTyahooDOTcom/group/whichversion/
BereanBeacon1 5 months ago
The Complete Jewish Bible and the Aramaic English New Testament are considerably more accurate than the KJV. I like the KJV, but it is not, by any means, the most accurate.
1 John 5:7 is actually not in the original text. Nor, is the end of Luke 4:4. It is a reference to Deut 8:3, where the entire sentence does appear.
ReverendTFunk 5 months ago
@ReverendTFunk Thank you.
This forum is a good place to post these kinds of questions.
h t t p://groupsDOTyahooDOTcom/group/whichversion
Will Kinney Defends the KJB Play List
h t t p://w w wDOTyoutubeDOTcom/playlist?list=PL16B2149EE5E54979
Articles: h t t p://brandpluckedDOTwebsDOTcom/articlesDOThtm
whichversion@yahoogroupsDOTcom
BereanBeacon1 5 months ago
@BereanBeacon1 I have always recognized some failures in the KJV. It was the best we could get from 400 years ago, but many scholars have taken the time to get much better translations. I am NOT a fan of many modern versions. They do not have the cultural background to speak to specific idiomatic issues. When I have really want to know the true meaning I seldom rely on KJV to give the best view. I still read it, because I am used to it. But, I look to better sources for in-depth understanding.
ReverendTFunk 5 months ago
@ReverendTFunk Well, Muslims and cults are in complete agreement with you about the KJB.
What Muslims are saying about our Bible
h t t p://brandpluckedDOTwebsDOTcom/muslimsandthebibleDOThtm
A Muslim and The Bible Translations - h t t p://hostedDOThomeserverDOTcom/warneveryone/muslim_and_bible_translationsDOThtm
BereanBeacon1 5 months ago
Love this vid :)
MessiahJesusisLord 5 months ago
@MessiahJesusisLord
Will Kinney Defends the KJB Play List
h t t p://w w wDOTyoutubeDOTcom/playlist?list=PL16B2149EE5E54979
BereanBeacon1 5 months ago
rips new bibles a new one!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
jonniec7 5 months ago
The bit about computers and "maybe our names are written in the Bible" is quite telling. Even if this doesn't immediately strike you as nuts, it happens to amount to an attack on any non-Hebrew version.
Brightfame73 6 months ago
Any teacher who uses more than one textbook would have amess. The same works for pastors and Bible versions.
theinsectmanofwv 6 months ago
A majority of Christians I know wonder why I only study, read and quote the KJV of the Bible. Go figure? You can't dispute what she said in this video. Thanks for sharing this!
BIGPOPRL 6 months ago
@BIGPOPRL
Indeed! I only came to know about the King James Bible some 18 months ago! Praise God He had His Spirit open my eyes to this truth!
Coincidentally, albeit there is no such thing, it was through Dave and his wife, Mary, that I learned about it!
I am eternally grateful to you two, Dave!
May God always bless you!
RainhadoCanto4 6 months ago
@BIGPOPRL The enemies of the cross really appreciate the corrupt translations, as it proves that Christians don't have the words of God.
A Muslim and The Bible Translations - h t t p://hostedDOThomeserverDOTcom/warneveryone/muslim_and_bible_translationsDOThtm
Are Modern Translations Trustworthy? Play List - h t t p://w w wDOTyoutubeDOTcom/view_play_list?p=CFD8DC47E427831E
BereanBeacon1 6 months ago
Luke 12:51 NIV Do you think I came to bring peace on earth? No, I tell you, but division. That's true its working....
Pil0sake 7 months ago
@Pil0sake The translators and textual critics caused the divisions and we point out the errors.
BereanBeacon1 7 months ago
The Bible Code?
Really?
blardosplats 7 months ago
Which Bible Translation of 1 timothy 2:12 is Trustworthy?
LaurieGalvan 7 months ago
i read that jesus name was translated from a sun god which is also connected to satanit comes from zeus and many other gods and jupitar also lucifer . where can people get a bible thats translated right from hebrew
danae417 8 months ago
@danae417 The King James Bible 1611 has the words of God.
BereanBeacon1 8 months ago
@BereanBeacon1 You can't buy the 1611 KJV in any shops. It got revised before taking the form it has now. Apparently there were spelling and printing errors.
Brightfame73 6 months ago
@Brightfame73 Continued - "With the exception of typographical errors and changes required by the process of orthography [spelling] in the English language, the text of our present Bibles remains unchanged, and without variations from the original copy as left by the translators. (Report of the Committee on Versions to the Board of Managers of the American Bible Society, 1852, pp. 7,11 as cited by George T. Crabb)
BereanBeacon1 6 months ago
@Brightfame73 There are three changes to the KJV since 1611.
1. 1612: Typography ( from Gothic to Roman type).
2. 1629 & 1638: Correction of typographical errors.
3. 1762 & 1769: Standardization of spelling. The 'Board of Managers' of the American Bible Society in 1852 determined that "The English Bible as left by the translators has come down to us unaltered in respect to its text..."
BereanBeacon1 6 months ago
You guys realize that this woman is a 3 time divorcee. She does not speak one word of ANY of the Biblical languages and has a degree in HOME ECONOMICS right? I am sure she can give you some great cleaning soap advice, but I would ignore her utter nonsense about the "KJV" Bible.
bigritchie 9 months ago
@bigritchie We have many other videos on this subject, if interested.
BereanBeacon1 9 months ago
@bigritchie Give us some proof where's your information. Thank you.
resetpattern 3 months ago
Ima bout to buy me a King James version! I got NLT its a good version but I want the fullness of Gods Word in full effect as I can get it. Ill use the NLT for simpler speech when needed but ima stay in the Word! Glad I got to watch this :)
Billete37 9 months ago
@Billete37 The NLT is garbage.The King James Bible is 95% 1 and 2 syllable words in it.
phaxad 7 months ago
Check out His other vids too
/watch?v=BVXjw4jd61M
All I'm going to say post
Jman3000 9 months ago
Suppose this lady who presented some facts of our times regarding false prophets and openly displaying how some have corrupted the holy book - she has been watchful, was it not said to be watchful, vigilant? at least she will tell her students to stay away from newer doctrines-to infiltrate the minds and hearts. though enough damage has been done. children get abnormal, crazy when words are being replaced or omitted another study proved. buy a facsimile of the 1611 kjv in old letter type not new
Zouscarlett 9 months ago
Some really ignorant, hateful comments have come to me lately.
If the people who wrote them had studied enough to know what they are talking about, instead of pushing propaganda, and repeating teachings like parrots, they wouldn't have said these things.
One suggested read is "Misquoting Jesus".
To be clear, if you think any version of the Bible 100% right/correct, your wrong.
Peace and love to you all, even the idiots.
PipeManChuck 10 months ago
The parallels in the King James prove it's the only Authorized word of God.
See the Aimed At America 2 video for examples on youtube.
vincent15641 10 months ago
The king james is one of the the worst versions you could possibly use. It was translated using lower quality inferior manuscripts. Other versions like NSRV go back to the oldest known manuscripts. Although to be honest, in my opinion it really makes little difference in my opinion, unless you are a literalistic fundamentalist. This topic is far larger than this and not at all simple.
PipeManChuck 10 months ago
@PipeManChuck
As vincent15641 put it so succinctly, "The parallels in the King James [Bible] prove it's the only Authorzed word of God.
"See the Aimed At America 2 video for examples on youtube"
When--if eve--did you come under the conviction that you are a lost sinner on your way to hell?
jjpetkusiii 10 months ago
@PipeManChuck Did you watch the video or just leave a comment?
rms16006 8 months ago
This question is for Gail. I watched your video and in it you mentioned C.S. Lewis. I was curious about what your opinion of him is.
Thanks,
-Leonard, Denver Colorado
1solisfamily 10 months ago
@apostleis these version or skin color wars are completelty useless topics while
ppl angst over these instead of spreading the gospel itself. wake up fools !
TheMessanjah 11 months ago
@TheMessanjah Muslims welcome your position on the translation issue, as they use the commentaries and modern translations to prove that Christians don't have the words of God as they do in the Quran. Cults also agree with you because they have multiple authorities and can point out the errors in the modern translations to attack the KJV.
BereanBeacon1 11 months ago
@BereanBeacon1 ...and they do that because they dont really want to accept the truth.
but untill they do, the version of the bible does not really matter.
TheMessanjah 11 months ago
@TheMessanjah
Perhaps you are missing the point: Moslems, who are lost and blind to the Gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ, easily understand that God can preserve what He wants to preserve without error--unlike you evidently since the Holy Scriptures instruct the sound Biblical doctrine of the preservation of the Old Testament and the New Testament in their entirety.
In English, by the way, the Holy Scriptures are commonly called the King James Bible.
jjpetkusiii 11 months ago
Obadiah 1:1 in the King James version: "(...)an ambassador is sent among the heathen..." Here's the same part in the English Revised Version (1885): "an ambassador is sent among the nations". Since so many corrections had to made due to new findings in words' meanings, how can you say the Authorized Version has the most accurate translation in all verses?
LDSfaithDefender 11 months ago
@LDSfaithDefender
As boggymark1 put is so succinctly, "you…missed the point. Scrivener's authoritative recension of the Received Text confirms the complete accuracy of the New Testament as it is found in the King James Bible. Moreover, the perfect translation of the Old Testament into English in the AV1611 is attested by Jacob ben Hayyim's Masoretic Text. No error, omission or addition in the Scritural text of the Authorized Version of the Holy Bible (KJV) has ever been proven."
jjpetkusiii 11 months ago
@LDSfaithDefender There are three changes to the KJV since 1611.
1. 1612: Typography ( from Gothic to Roman type).
2. 1629 & 1638: Correction of typographical errors.
3. 1762 & 1769: Standardization of spelling. The 'Board of Managers' of the American Bible Society in 1852 determined that "The English Bible as left by the translators has come down to us unaltered in respect to its text..."
BereanBeacon1 11 months ago
@LDSfaithDefender Continued - "With the exception of typographical errors and changes required by the process of orthography [spelling] in the English language, the text of our present Bibles remains unchanged, and without variations from the original copy as left by the translators. (Report of the Committee on Versions to the Board of Managers of the American Bible Society, 1852, pp. 7,11 as cited by George T. Crabb)
BereanBeacon1 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Obadiah 1:1 in the King James version: "(...)an ambassador is sent among the heathen..." Here's the same part of that verse in the English Revised Version, made in 1885: "an ambassador is sent among the nations"
In all, tons of corrections had to made due to new findings in words' meanings centuries after the Authorized Version: surely, you can't say the Authorized Version has the most accurate translation in all verses!
LDSfaithDefender 11 months ago
Comment removed
LDSfaithDefender 11 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This feeling is only natural. Its called repentance. What a crock. Jesus didnt promote what Paul did. Not at all.
SCORNDOGGMELACH 11 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
However he was a real hit and remains so for the majority of commons who approach the cross before they approach the scriptures in any signifigant manner. Emmotionally desperate and scripturally retarded they are willing to believe anything they are told. The best ?worst part of this formula is that the puking up of his dirty little sins is what truely glues him to the church. With a clear conscience he feels a great weight has been lifted and he starts to feel comforted, CALLING IT SPIRIT!
SCORNDOGGMELACH 11 months ago
@SCORNDOGGMELACH
Sound Biblical doctrine and valid hermeneutic methodology is neither an opinion poll or a game of dice.
You fail exegesis, by the way, in case you aren't already aware of that obvious reality.
jjpetkusiii 11 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Funny how she equates the word 'WORD' WITH 'KING JAMES BIBLE'. 'Thou' isnt refering to God. What an airhead. You dips believe FIRST than look for support in the scriptures. Youre studying backwards. Its not that you think youre right, but rather you couldnt survive let alone CONSIDER the possibility of being wrong. And any one that objects to what you live in your head must be from the devil. Its a Joke. YOU CAN KEEP ALL YOUR TRANSLATIONS.
SCORNDOGGMELACH 11 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Why oh why are Christian fundamentalists so very very dumb? What in the bloody FUCK is WRONG with those people?
a1mint 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
She Leaves out the Part that the King James bible has profanity in it. Look in the Book of 1 Samuel chapter 22 where the word Piss is used. also in first kings Man is known for Pissing on the wall. Also in the New Testament Ass is used Several Times. Bastard is used alot in the King James. And people Label this as the word of God? I Don't think so. the Hcsb bible does not have profanity in it. I Also use the NLT Bible. She also does not tell you King James was a well Known freemason
jakethesnakerobertz1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jakethesnakerobertz1
The fact is that no one without exception who has argued against the King James Bible has been able to defend his own mistranslations into English in a public forum for any significant length of time because they (like you in this case) only regurgitate sophistries and transparent propaganda favored by Alexandrian cultists, atheists, crackpot advocates of Scientology, etc.
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Vote bot heaven here...
a1mint 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This lady is not arguing whether or not the BIble itself is true, she is arguing specifically, that among the many books calling themselves Bibles there is a supremacy of texts. If one was to read one or the other the best of the options is the King James Version. That is the only point being made here.
Talithapraiz 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
They are clams the New Age movement is a non-religious spiritual movement that developed in the latter half of the 20th century. It's not true....they make jesus look smaller and less important and changing Word of God easiest vey to do it...Don't Be Deceived! "As you have therefore received Christ Jesus the Lord, so walk in Him, rooted and built up in Him and established in the faith, ...
vladimirkhrustalev 1 year ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
Even Caiaphas, a conspirator to the unjust trial and crucifixion of Jesus of Nazareth, the Son of God, the Messiah, prophesied, and not one verse of Scripture will pass away (in fact, not a word) according to the Saviour Himself. God--not man--preserves the Holy Scriptures, His own inspired words in their entirety. In English, they are called the King James Bible.
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Picking on Christian is like shooting fish in a barrel. Unimaginably stupid, one by one.
a1mint 1 year ago
@a1mint
You got nothing, and that's all that Darwinism ever had to offer: no proof, to be sure, only a laughable and superficial theory supported by more myth and misinformation promoted by the ranks of obscurantists where atheists characteristically have been found in the vanguard.
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@jjpetkusiii All you have is your bronze age doctrine myth. The rest of humanity can draw from science, progress, an ever increased understanding, discoveries, and all the rest of it.
Evolution has been proven, period. You can lie and distort and make things up till you're blue in the face, your attempts to discredit these incredible amounts of data is absolutely pathetic.
a1mint 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@a1mint
No, not at all, and the "bottom line" is this: Darwin's theory of evolution has never been proven by the scientific method. Moreover, it contradicts laws of empirical science which have been proven, notably thermodynamics, and "evolution" is inherently flawed as an hypothesis for a variety of reasons.
Free of errors, omissions, and additions as an irrefutable fact, however, the King James Bible is the Holy Scriptures, preserved by the LORD and verbally inerrant in English.
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@jjpetkusiii You're lying *AGAIN*. Evolution has been proven in many ways.
evolution(dot)berkeley(dot)edu
"What is the evidence for evolution"
"Lines of evidence"
"Fossil evidence"
"Homologies"
"Distribution in time and space"
"Evidence by example"
Your bible has plenty of errors. For one, there wasn't any world wide flood. There was no talking snake. The list of crap from that book goes on and on and on.
Also check out evilbible(dot)com to show your "god" is quite the little psychopath.
a1mint 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@a1mint
Apparently, you never tire of posting superficial double talk since the object of your scribblings here is obviously to promote your faithless variety of ungodliness by any means at your disposal no matter how patently ludicrous. "Homologies" is just another word for "analogies" which have never constituted empirical evidence of any scientific theory, and of course, they do not constitute a proof of Darwinism any more than the rest of your transparent sophistry does.
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@jjpetkusiii Sure it has been proven. There are various different forms of evidence that all lead to the same conclusion. Just because it doesn't look like it's happening right in front of your eyes, does not mean it doesn't exist. Check out evolution(dot)berkeley(dot)edu which is a good starting point showing various forms of evidence.
You WANT it to be false, but you don't have one single argument against it, other than you hate it.
a1mint 1 year ago
@a1mint
No, what you cited and posted here is insufficient and unnecessary to establish the empirical proof of any "theory of evolution." You just flatter yourself to the point where it is nauseating to any alert reader who happens to stumble across your convoluted drivel.
For the English-speaking people, however the King James Bible is the Holy Scriptures, preserved by the LORD and free of errors, omissions, and additions as an irrefutable matter of historical fact.
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@jjpetkusiii By the way, I'm pretty sure that you are h2omanz. Just one little coincidence too many. You should have spaced out your commenting on the two videos where we're arguing a little better to prevent getting discovered.
a1mint 1 year ago
@a1mint
I'm not sure that you are a paranoid schizophrenic even though you write like one. After all, many inveterate obscurantists suffer from delusions brought on by manic depression, alcoholism, drug abuse, etc.
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@jjpetkusiii It's rather coincidental to see that time and time again, suddenly there are responses on two videos about the same subject.
We'll leave it to normal rational logical intelligent people to decide who is the delusional one here. I'm not worried for a split second.
a1mint 1 year ago
@a1mint
Your clearly vain cavilling, on the other hand, is hardly a coincidence according to the Holy Scriptures.
"And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil" (John 3:16).
No one (e.g., an incessant obscurantist like you) in history, however, has never proven a single linguistic or historical fact that refutes the plenary verbal inerrancy of the King James Bible in fully legible English today.
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@jjpetkusiii Absolutely pathetic. Front to back, left to right, inside out.
a1mint 1 year ago
@a1mint
No, the fact of the matter is that Darwinism is absolutely indefensible, front "to back, left to right, inside out" by anyone (e.g., an illogical atheist like you) because the "theory of evolution" remains a failed hypothesis more than a century after the death of the Victorian crank who postulated it.
For the English-speaking peoples, however, the King James Bible is the Holy Scriptures, preserved by the LORD and free of errors, omissions, and additions as an irrefutable fact.
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@jjpetkusiii What is "Darwinism"? Darwin was just a guy that was trying to make sense of life on earth. There's no such thing as "Darwinism". You're desperately looking for labels to use for your pathetic little propaganda campaigns. But noone is listening. Any of the crap you're barfing up isn't changing the world in any way.
I'm *very* logical. I go by science, evidence, knowledge, proof, etc. You are going on faith, the process of non-thinking. So it's clearly YOU that's illogical.
a1mint 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@a1mint ROFLOL!
As LBBspock wrote, "There is a blindness upon all of you Bible...rejectors. It is reminiscent of profesing Christians who supported Obama for President. When you people are presented with facts and truths that unequivocally prove the A.V. is perfect you resort to denial and obtuseness. A person can read a Bible tract and get saved, that does not make the Bible tract the word of God. However, to grow properly you need the sincere milk and meat that only the A.V. can supply."
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@jjpetkusiii What in the FUCK does ANY of this have ANYTHING to do with Obama?
You are so lost in your little Bible. Can't you understand how others thing it's just a bunch of stories written way back when?
a1mint 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@a1mint
The Holy Scriptures have been preserved by God Himself, and they were translated into English without error, omission, or addition in 1611. Since that time, manuscript evidence has established that the text of the King James Bible derives from Antioch--where the disciples were first called Christians--chiefly down the Byzantine line, and therefore comes from the pure Biblical texts. Moreover, valid hermeneutic methology and sound Biblical doctrine and are not matters of debate
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@jjpetkusiii Why do you keep copy-pasting this propaganda bullshit? What is your agenda?
a1mint 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@a1mint What a mindless but predictable reply!
As jnest 55 wrote, "Remember also that the first thing that the devil attacked was God's Word. In the Garden, God told Adam and Eve "In the day that ye eat of it ye shall surely die"; then the devil came and first, questioned what God had said- "hast God said ye shall not eat of EVERY tree of the garden?"-- and then openly contradicted God's word --"ye shall not surely die". It has been the devils plan all along to attack God's Word."
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@jjpetkusiii Why? You do keep copy-pasting that same James King this and Jame King that crap. You don't have anything to say outside your little Bible. You are so far gone it just isn't funny. Reality outside the confines of your Bible simply isn't real to you.
The crap in your mind is absolutely absurd!
a1mint 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@a1mint
Popish ideologues, crypto-Romanist ideologues, and witless skeptics like you love to whine and cry foul whenever their hideous betrayals are unmasked. Judas hanged himself but he is still the son of perditon, and his suicide did not save him.
For the English-speaking peoples, however, the King James Bible is the Holy Scriptures, preserved by the LORD and free of errors, omissions, and additions as an irrefutable matter of historical fact.
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@jjpetkusiii Like I said, the crap in your mind is absolutely absurd!
a1mint 1 year ago
@a1mint
As Providential 1611 wrote, "Catholicism…LITERALLY cut off men heads, limbs, tongues, babies out of pregnant women, etc. Rome hates the King James Bible because it is OF GOD and exposes Rome for the cult it is. The Bible teaches us not to walk with heretics anyway, but to expose, mark, note and shun them. What you view as cultic and sectarian is simply Biblical obedience to be separate from idolaters, greedy people and peddlers of another Gospel."
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@jjpetkusiii God's a psychopath and people following religion fanatically are fucked in the head. Gotchya. But I already knew that.
a1mint 1 year ago
@a1mint
You should try reading something other than jesuitical propaganda, swill from the gutter by atheist activists and their hack supporters, or the works of Calvinistic ideologues who substitute their own neo-Augustinian rhetoric for valid hermeneutic methodology.
Neither any Vatican operative, nor caviling Calvinist, nor you, nor any other skeptical eisegete has ever proven even a single linguistic or historical fact that refutes the verbal inerrancy of the King James Bible in English.
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@jjpetkusiii Practically every claim it makes has been disproven. The flood never was, Adam & Eve never were, noone reached the age of 600 or past 1000 even, the earth was not created in six days, a tower had nothing to do with the fact that people speak different languages, and the list goes on and on and on.
That little bible is so absolutely over the top pathetic, it just aint funny! I don't care which translation you're into.
a1mint 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@a1mint You can't prove any of the assertions that you just posted, and no one ever has.
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago 3
@a1mint
As jjpetkusiii put it, "Rational discourse is not the last wrinkle on Calvin Klein's spring runway, hoser.
"Either a premise is true or false, and the overwhelming majority of yours (barely discernible for their convoluted rhetoric) fit the latter category."
I don't want to dispute your dubious opinions and clearly vulgar preferences, but the King James Bible is the Holy Scriptures, peserved by the LORD and verbally inerrant in English as an irrefutable matter of historical fact.
boggymark1 1 year ago 12
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@boggymark1 Good grief, you and him constantly suck up to each other, don't you? Or perhaps you're the same person.
Anyway, you wouldn't recognize rational thinking from a hole in the ground.
You're delusional and disturbed.
Someone ought to monitor you, because you're one of those weirdos.
a1mint 1 year ago
@a1mint
No one can honestly deny that your posts are riddled with a number of apparently eccentric themes, and as jsjsonify put it so succinctly, "…we're no more evolved from apes then we are from a hyena. Science is always catching up 2 the Bible. U say faith is non-thinking but sounds like u just believe what the "world" tells u! Full of holes if u stop & listen. & every1 who has the Holy Spirit is of the same person but u just sound like a paranoid schizoid!"
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@jjpetkusiii We'll leave the judging to others. I'm not worried for a split second. That you wish to believe in a god, fine. But for you to pretend that science is wrong about just about everything, and that instead all the answers are in a book written by a few people thousands of years ago, THAT truly is LUDICROUS!
The big problem with you people is that you are fighting and going against science. You are, in effect, being stupid and crazy!
a1mint 1 year ago
@a1mint
"Doth God pervert judgment? or doth the Almighty pervert justice?" (Job 8:3).
"Behold, God will not cast away a perfect man, neither will he help the evil doers" (Job 8:20).
No one (e.g., a skeptic who attempts to wrest the Scriptures like you) in history has ever proven even one historical or linguistic fact that refutes the plenary verbal inerrancy of the King James Bible in fully legible English today, which is the lingua franca of our contemporary world.
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@jjpetkusiii You have to understand. The moment I notice any of this Job 1:2 and other references to verses, my eyes glance over it and I don't read it. And that is because I think the Bible is full of shit. A bunch of manipulative stuff to control your mind. There is something about when an assertive seemingly authoritative statement is made, that seems to grab hold of people. It goes for things other than religion as well. It is why people are impressionable and controllable.
a1mint 1 year ago
@a1mint
"First of all," as IBelieveMyBible wrote, "your premise is erroneous. We are not KJVonlyist. It is simply because we believe our Bible in its entirety and those who prefer the NIV, NASV etc. dont believe their bible completely that we are despised and thus in an effort to devide we are called KJVonlyists." Of course, Darwinism is totally wacko, as irrational as a UFO aficionados' convention on a landfill in Hoboken, New Jersey after high tea before noon at Harrod's.
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@jjpetkusiii It's similar to when a parents gives a lecture. Or how when you get an angry statement from a government. Or when something serious happens and you're watching the news.
It doesn't work with me. I always have my spidy senses out and refuse to let my mind be controlled.
Critical and independent thinking is a quality that needs to be learned early on.
You religious people do the opposite. You teach your children to become susceptible to mind control.
That's why so many are superstitio
a1mint 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@a1mint
Unlike historical and linguistic ignoramuses, Christians who know that the King James Bible is the Holy Scriptures, preserved by the LORD usually understand many things. For example, atheism is a conversation piece for solipsists who cannot handle the axiomatic reality of God's existence because the guilty awareness that they will be judged by their Eternal Creator displeases them. "The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth His handywork" (Psalm 19:1).
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@jjpetkusiii The world looks completely different when you think independently. It means having to make choices and understanding the impact of decisions. You take on life differently. You wrap yourself in this delusional goo of religious ooze. Even though nothing is really there, you have the impression that some sort of authority, some sort of loving uber parent, is watching and guiding you.
You'll have to overlook when it fails you of course.
a1mint 1 year ago
@a1mint Again, you miss the point.
"Even the righteousness of God which is by faith of Jesus Christ unto all and upon all them that believe: for there is no difference: For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God; Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus: Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God" (Romans 3:22).
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@jjpetkusiii It might be better for some to relinquish their mind to religion, because without it, they simply can not cut it. Life is too harsh, and the world demands too much. What better way, than to turn off your mind, and let a community invite you in their ooze of gooey mystical bliss. Something you feel is beyond you, but somehow is your friend. Churches know this, and totally take advantage of this - it is how they got started.
It is how and why the Bible was constructed. Mind control.
a1mint 1 year ago
@a1mint
As jondabil wrote, "God preserved the 'very words' God spoke? Where?...Enlighten my 'vast' ignorance. Tell me which text that YOU have in Greek that is EXACTLY the same as the originals, and don't tell me "THE Greek text," because there are over 27 of them and over 5,000 Greek manuscripts. Also, tell me, was the TRANSLATION in the original of Moses and Pharoah's conversation from Egyptian to Hebrew preserved?"
No error in the King James Bible has ever been proven by anyone (e.g., you).
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@jjpetkusiii Thera are lots of errors in the Bible. Like that flood that never happened. And how languages weren't the result of people building a high tower at all. Splitting of the Red Sea never happened. There was no Adam & Eve and there was no talking snake.
The list goes on and on. And you're trying to claim "accuracy". Lol and lol!
a1mint 1 year ago
@a1mint
Those are not examples of "errors" anywhere in the Scriptural text of the King James Bible. On the other hand, your terrified reluctance or retarded inability to accept the reality of miracles does not constitute and has never proven any mistake on the part of the Lord God omnipotent.
Verbally inerrant as an irrefutable matter of historical fact, the King James Bible is the Holy Scriptures, preserved by the LORD, in English today, which is the lingua franca of our contemorary world.
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago
@a1mint Yeah, nevermind the fact it has 100% accurate prophecy. Man-made, right?
filoIII 1 year ago 12
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@filoIII That's a lie. It's "prophecies", ie predictions, aren't accurate at all.
a1mint 1 year ago
@a1mint Before 500 B.C. the Daniel proclaimed that Israel's long-awaited Messiah would begin his public ministry 483 years after the issuing of a decree to restore and rebuild Jerusalem (Daniel 9:25-26). He further predicted that the Messiah would be "cut off," killed, and that this event would take place prior to a second destruction of Jerusalem. Abundant documentation shows that these prophecies were perfectly fulfilled in the life (and crucifixion) of Jesus Christ.
filoIII 1 year ago 16
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@filoIII Nonsense. All just stories upon stories. I can't believe people for this ancient crap.
I can make a prediction too. Soon there will be another war. And thereafter there will be rebuilding.
These things are just inevitable. Like Jews wanting to form a country, and eventually Israel formed. Pretty predictable.
a1mint 1 year ago
@a1mint Now you need to inform us what country will attack what country, from what direction, their motivation for initiating the attack, who will be the allies of each side, how long the battle will last, then if the losing nation will recover. Your time starrrrrts----NOW!
filoIII 1 year ago 16
@filoIII
The Holy Bible is also quite clear about unbelief during the Great Apostasy even as we can see it today.
"But, beloved, remember ye the words which were spoken before of the apostles of our Lord Jesus Christ; How that they told you there should be mockers in the last time, who should walk after their own ungodly lusts" (Jude 1:17ff).
"For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water"
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago
@a1mint In approximately 700 B.C. the prophet Micah named the tiny village of Bethlehem as the birthplace of Israel's Messiah (Micah 5:2). The fulfillment of this prophecy in the birth of Christ is one of the most widely known and widely celebrated facts in history.
You want more?
filoIII 1 year ago 10
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@filoIII Stories upon stories. And there isn't even any real solid evidence that this "Messiah" Jesus ever even existed. Things didn't get written about him decades after his alleged death. Knowing how superstitious people are now and especially back then, the further you go back to crazier people were, it's far more plausible that it's all just stories. There is the matter of that missing evidence.
I can offer some much more plausible evidence: evolution.
a1mint 1 year ago
@a1mint Do you believe Aristotle existed? Be careful of your answer, cause you're on the verge of being made to look like a fool, and it'll be of your own doing.
filoIII 1 year ago 10
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@filoIII Let's get one thing straight here. I am not the one that is looking like a fool. The ones looking like a fool are the ones constantly quoting verses from the Bible. The ones contradicting science and facts. The ones that are clearly delusional. The ones that pretend that information that contradicts their doctrine, does not exist or is automatically invalid.
End of day, faith is the process of non-thinking. Are you one of those?
a1mint 1 year ago
@a1mint Did you ever "think"??
Some of us have seen the foggy content of your rubbish in a variety of illogical forms at all sorts of venues published in several languages but never very cogently.
Free of errors, omissions, and additions as an irrefutable matter of historical fact in any case, the King James Bible is the Holy Scriptures, preserved by the LORD, in fully legible English today, which is the lingua franca of our contemporary world.
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@jjpetkusiii It is *YOU* that doesn't think. Faith is the process of non-thinking. What YOU are barfing up is rubbish, because it is YOU that keeps quoting stories from thousands of years ago.
Free of errors my ass. That flood never happen, so that's an error right there. There was no Ade & Eve.
a1mint 1 year ago
@a1mint
I never met your donkey, but he (or she) in all his inerrant perfection belongs to an owner who failed to prove any of your assertions here.
Indeed, no one (e.g., an illogical promoter of Darwinism like you) in history has ever proven the "theory of evolution" or even a single historical or linguistic fact that refutes the plenary verbal inerrancy of the King James Bible, which is the Holy Scriptures, preserved by the LORD, and therefore the final authority in all matters in English.
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@jjpetkusiii The Bible is a set of stories written by a bunch of superstitious people thousands of years ago, created to manipulate and control people.
Science is the process of proving and gaining knowledge and understanding through evidence and examinations. It is a process that improves all the time.
Evolution is one of many things that are support by enough evidence where it has become unreasonable to deny it.
One thing is for damn well sure: you are *NOT* the rational thinking one here!
a1mint 1 year ago
@a1mint
Thank you for your prompt and characteristically illogical reply, but your empty rhetoric does not constitute any proof whatsoever of your revamped bronze age myths of "evolution" ex nihilo which also lacks empirical evidence according to the scientific method in every language.
Free of errors, omissions, and additions as an irrefutable matter of historical fact, on the other hand, the King James Bible is the Holy Scriptures, preserved by the LORD, in fully legible English today.
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@jjpetkusiii Not empty at all. It is the logical conclusion. Stories that completely contradict science left and right, leads to that logical conclusion.
You are entirely and completely full of utter SHIT.
a1mint 1 year ago
@a1mint No. not at all.
Your inability to reconcile your Darwinist pipedreams with the factual proof of thermodynamics as empirical science is your problem, but certainly not that of anyone who believes the King James Bible, which is the Holy Scriptures, preserved by the LORD, as an irrefutable matter of historical fact.
Nothing that you have posted here is even worth consideration by anyone who actually knows what the word "science" (i.e., knowledge, the antithesis of your ignorance) means.
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@jjpetkusiii You keep repeating the same garbage over and over and over. Again, Darwin was a scientist that tried to make sense of life on earth. Many other people have taken this to a far greater extend.
And again, the Bible is full of shit, because it's full of stories that could not have happened, and it completely contradicts everything we KNOW is real.
a1mint 1 year ago
@a1mint
Yes, it's really quite simple: ignorant vulgarian that your are, you nonetheless want to revive Theater of the Absurd all by yourself. There may be other irrational reasons for your posts, but that would be the most benign.
For the English-speaking peoples in any case, the King James Bible is the Holy Scriptures, preserved by the LORD and verbally inerrant in fully legible English today.
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago
@jjpetkusiii Vulgarian--I LIKE THAT! May I use that?
filoIII 1 year ago 15
@filoIII Amen and amen, Brother!
Thank you for your thoughtful request.
Of course, no vulgarian or any other skeptical eisegete in history has ever proven even one historical or linguistic fact that refutes the plenary verbal inerrancy of the King James Bible in fully legible English today, which is the lingua franca of our contemporary world. The Holy Scriptures, given by inspiration, inerrant, infallible, and preserved by the LORD, are the only reliable final authority in all matters.
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@jjpetkusiii What's more stupid and ignorant? Blindly believing and defending stories from thousands of years ago, without questioning it, or, following the scientific process and what it reveals. Like the various dating techniques that reveal how old fossils are?
It's not just that you're ignorant, you choose to avoid anything that contradicts with your doctrine. You are in effect, being completely stupid by choice.
a1mint 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@a1mint
As boggymark1 wrote, "I don't want to dispute your dubious opinions and clearly vulgar preferences, but the King James Bible is the Holy Scriptures, preserved by the LORD and verbally inerrant in English as an irrefutable matter of historical fact."
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago 3
@a1mint
Your posts merely reveal that you are also an obscurantist prone to whining. You have not proved any error in the text of the King James Bible because God created the species as distinct--every one of them. Taxonomy by contemporary standards has little relevance to the designations of the kinds of animal life that are cited in the Holy Scriptures, and those terms are entirely appropriate and rational in their context.
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@jjpetkusiii we've already mutually debunked the flood. That means there is at least one leak in that bible. The tower of babel is not responsible for the start of multiple languages, because we all know that languages develop on their own. So that's two leaks.
There was no talking snake, three leaks.
The list goes on and on. The Bible is clearly full of crap.
a1mint 1 year ago
@a1mint
The deluge of sophistry that you post as comments on YouTube videos in support of the Darwinist myth is still a sad fact of contemporary life.
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@jjpetkusiii Evolution is a theory that is backed by a very large amount of evidence. Pretending it's not real demonstrates that you willfully close your eyes and decide that science doesn't exist.
That's exactly how people thought in the olden days. You are in effect, stuck in the olden days.
Antiquated, outdated, ignorant, dumb, and stupid, amongst other things. Sociopath fits you quite nicely as well.
a1mint 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@a1mint No, you constantly miss the point.
Verbally inerrant as a matter of irrefutable fact, the King James Bible is the Holy Scriptures in English, which is the lingua franca of our contemporary world.
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago 2
@a1mint
As boggymark1 wrote, "...you consistently missed the point. Scrivener's authoritative recension of the Received Text confirms the complete accuracy of the New Testament as it is found in the King James Bible. Moreover, the perfect translation of the Old Testament into English in the AV1611 is attested by Jacob ben Hayyim's Masoretic Text. No error, omission or addition in the Scritural text of the Authorized Version of the Holy Bible (KJV) has ever been proven"
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@jjpetkusiii YOU consistently miss the point. The Bible has a lot of stuff in it that is incorrect. Just about any claim it makes about the the earth and life on it, is flat out false.
a1mint 1 year ago
@a1mint No.
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@jjpetkusiii No what? YES. The Bible *IS* full of stuff that is incorrect. You can deny that till you're blue in the face. But that fact isn't going to go away.
a1mint 1 year ago
@a1mint
While Gentile infidels like you have very little interest in learning how to read English in context like rational adults as a rule, the Holy Scriptures are very clear to regenerated believers in the Lord Jesus Christ.
"And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his name JESUS: for he shall save his people from their sins" (Matthew 1:21).
No one in history, by the way, has ever presented a single historical or linguistic fact that disproves the King James Bible in English.
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@jjpetkusiii It's become clear that you're just copy-pasting the same shit over and over.
Your delusional bullshit has absolutely no meaning to me whatsoever, because I know better than to blindly accept a bronze age myth.
a1mint 1 year ago
@a1mint
Of course, no one is ever required to comment on your illogical poppycock that contradicts proven laws of empirical science, or obliged to answer your foolish and unlearned questions, but thanks for asking anyway.
Free of errors, omissions and additions as an irrefutable matter of historical fact, the King James Bible is the Holy Scriptures in fully legible English today, which is the lingua franca of our contemporary world, and it is therefore the final authority in all matters.
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@jjpetkusiii Evolution is backed by lots of evidence. Check out evolution(dot)berkeley(dot)edu for starters.
And again, that Bible of yours is littered with errors left and right front to back.
There was no flood for starters. There also was no talking snake.
a1mint 1 year ago
@a1mint
Actually, your unscientific Darwinist myth and jesuitical sophistries contrary to Holy Scriptures are just a bit of an oddball spin on the dogma of Rome, the great whore according to Revelation 17 and Revelation 18. Just as the Vatican supported Hitler's rise to power, so the Roman Curia connives at neo-Nazism today.
You still miss the point.
jjpetkusiii 1 year ago