Zane, can you do a tutorial so you can make your own algs for the normal speed optimal 3 cycles? I hear people understand the algs so they really don't have to memorize every single one, but I don't get them at all. My pb in bld is 4:25.27 with M2 and OP corners, and I'd really love to get faster.
@VagrantWatcher213 Hi, one day I hope to make such a tutorial. But at the moment I'm in year 12 and don't have as much time as I use to. There are plenty of other resources on the net to learn 3-cycles (especially on the Speedsolving forums and wiki). Good luck with your BLD, sorry I can't do much to help you right now.
@tonayan6 Hi, there's a more complicated way of solving cases like that. That will require more a slight amount of commutator understanding. Otherwise, just use M2 until you find an easy case where the target is outside the M-slice.
Wow, this is a nice idea! I found it more useful for r2 for edges in big cubes, because there are 6, not 2, edges on inner slices with long algorithms, but now I can do 1 or even 2 setup moves and solve them in a short way! Thank you very much!
Very interesting! Helped me a lot since I am currently using M2 for edges. Definitely be using this techniques in future solves, though I would like to ask, how often would you get a case where there isn't a 1 move setup? Also, if the case is more than a 1 move setup would you recommend doing it? Thanks in advance.
@huntforfood99 Thanks for the feedback. I'm not exactly sure of the number of cases that have a one move setup, they come up fairly often anyway. I recommended looking for 1 move setups to avoid too much thinking. But after this system has been practised, longer setups could be easy and fast.
Zane, can you do a tutorial so you can make your own algs for the normal speed optimal 3 cycles? I hear people understand the algs so they really don't have to memorize every single one, but I don't get them at all. My pb in bld is 4:25.27 with M2 and OP corners, and I'd really love to get faster.
VagrantWatcher213 1 week ago
@VagrantWatcher213 Correction, full OP.
VagrantWatcher213 1 week ago
@VagrantWatcher213 Hi, one day I hope to make such a tutorial. But at the moment I'm in year 12 and don't have as much time as I use to. There are plenty of other resources on the net to learn 3-cycles (especially on the Speedsolving forums and wiki). Good luck with your BLD, sorry I can't do much to help you right now.
ZaneChannel 1 week ago
thanks a lot, nice tutoril.
TheStephen506 1 month ago
@TheStephen506 Thanks for the feedback, and thanks everyone else also.
ZaneChannel 1 month ago
Really a nice and thought provoking tutorial!! Thanks a lot for the value addition!! :-)
OmkarIndia 1 month ago
Hey zane, and what if the target is in de M slice, just execute normal M2 until i have the next target outside M slice?, thanks btw :)
tonayan6 1 month ago
@tonayan6 Hi, there's a more complicated way of solving cases like that. That will require more a slight amount of commutator understanding. Otherwise, just use M2 until you find an easy case where the target is outside the M-slice.
ZaneChannel 1 month ago
@ZaneChannel Thanks, I found this more efficient than normal M2, excelent video.
tonayan6 1 month ago
Could you make a tutorial about commutators and commutator theory? I dont think we care if its long. We enjoy your videos.
peregrinecommando99 1 month ago
@peregrinecommando99 I want to make one some day, "maybe" in February if I have time.
ZaneChannel 1 month ago
Hey Zane, is this supposed to be done during memo or actual solving?
peregrinecommando99 1 month ago
@peregrinecommando99 Solving.
ZaneChannel 1 month ago
Wow, this is a nice idea! I found it more useful for r2 for edges in big cubes, because there are 6, not 2, edges on inner slices with long algorithms, but now I can do 1 or even 2 setup moves and solve them in a short way! Thank you very much!
Korbinification 1 month ago
Wow, that was much easier then i would think! Excellent tutorial!
alfredbirk 1 month ago
This is extremely helpful, thank you very much Z
Engberg711 1 month ago
Very interesting! Helped me a lot since I am currently using M2 for edges. Definitely be using this techniques in future solves, though I would like to ask, how often would you get a case where there isn't a 1 move setup? Also, if the case is more than a 1 move setup would you recommend doing it? Thanks in advance.
huntforfood99 1 month ago
@huntforfood99 Thanks for the feedback. I'm not exactly sure of the number of cases that have a one move setup, they come up fairly often anyway. I recommended looking for 1 move setups to avoid too much thinking. But after this system has been practised, longer setups could be easy and fast.
ZaneChannel 1 month ago
@kirtpro Ugh, thanks for pointing that out lol. I'll just add an annotation.
ZaneChannel 1 month ago
@ZaneChannel lol no problem, nice idea on this.
ill try adding commutators into my blind solves after i learn some ollcp algs :P
kirtpro 1 month ago
example 4, isnt LB meant to be RB?
kirtpro 1 month ago