Added: 1 month ago
From: AMDUnprocessed
Views: 3,954
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (73)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • astounding ! I can see a time in the not so distant future where the Apu will incorporate a top ranked gpu as the igp core.

    Amd has certainly laid the ground work for it.

    any 4 core chip is more than powerful enough, today it is the igp where the future is.

  • yes AMD APU is faster than this intel processors

  • AMD power !! Wow !

  • Intels integrated graphics are also very poor. Even when Ivy bridge comes out, it will most likely amount to maybe an a6 at best. Intel is trying hard to compete with Radeon with integrated graphics. AMD owns Radeon, but they are doing very well with it.

  • Okay people saying that its a lie are not always correct. The software AMD is showing now benefits directly from working with AMD. Its almost like Nvidia runs an Nvidia based game, the performance is normally a lot better. Of course AMD will be much better with a software designed for an AMD gpu (even the integrated one).

  • @trom2004

    It is only good if it is true (maybe intel lies too) then what is here accused as flimsy.

  • I waiting for the new APU with this GPU /watch?v=lLCCGS5vUx4 and faster CPU core it's the ultimate Ivy Bridge killer

  • Before you call something a lie, you should first check for it rather honest Magazines or at best check 1:1 it yourself.

  • It's a GPU accelerated PROGRAMs, intel graphic core is too slow that it can beat the Nvidia or AMD GPUs.

  • intel lie about that CPU and their IGPs performance, get learn more about this lies bevore you talk shit.

  • This video is a lie because it's not a completely different video of completely different results from a completely different benchmark using completely different software run on completely different CPUs.

  • intel compiler benchmark SW are lies

  • I like AMD processors, but I hate how you guys lie about your performance.

    It's like those crappy "ONLY $19.95, IT HAVE $50 VALUE no... $2000 VALUE FYEAH BUY THIS PIECE OF SHIT"!

    At least be honest and you won't get negative feedback. It's possible you could be quicker, but merely marginally. You better not fuck up ATI now that it's under the AMD name, like when AT&T renamed Cingular to AT&T.

  • @sonic3243

    What lie? Intel propagando clips on channelintel are lies...

  • @StevensiTX I didn't say Intel lied either. The users are right, think about the movie Tron.

    AMD and Intel can boast about their CPUs as much as they want, but I won't believe them. They haven't come very far with CPUs in the last 3 years. IBM PowerPC wasn't even as fast as Apple tried to make it sound.

  • @sonic3243

    are you crazy, if you do not know then you should not be a lemming like the nachlabern what a few idiots here "believe".

  • @StevensiTX Intel AND Amd lie about performance. It's a marketing trick. Don't believe it. I didn't say AMD was better than Intel, I didn't say Intel was better than AMD. They're both very excellent choices for filling different shoes.

    Only the users show accurate results. Marketing ploys are the reason I have a hard time trusting companies.

    As an example, McDonalds says they use real meat. It's heavily salted cardilage, chemicals, and who knows what the hell other stuff they use.

  • Dumb comment and this comment ratings are sick

  • Comment removed

  • INTEL GRAPHICS SUCKS!

  • Legit reviews/benchmarks show exactly the opposite

  • @dolph123454321 Not in Vreveal, god.. do you people have problems reading?

  • @medallish In any other video editing program Intel owns AMD by far

  • @dolph123454321 Except when that program uses the GPU, even the small GPU on Llano is much more powerfull than any single Intel CPU. Now I know there are programs that use Quicksync and that's pretty fast, but that's a programmed feature, it has 0 to do with the power of the CPU,

  • AMD APU BEST !

  • can compare with same level ? 

  • For APU AMD truely overall faster than SB overall..not as a CPU.so what's wrong with this video??? nothing wrong I think..

  • tested now!

    this piece of bullshit tool not use over than 6% of gpu!!!

    it use the cpu power with premium profile option enabled!

    so not wast you money and time :-) u advised!

  • i go only for amd for the price not for the performence the just suck at it. So cheap 4 core with some nice ghz will not decrease my gaming so thats why i use amd if the going to slack my games i go for intel

  • i went with amd cause its cheaper

  • Well idiots not a fan here. This video compares the CPU in a price range not against the same type because if you want the 'same' with Intel you have to pay more with a core i7-2720 for example. And with the same price from a i5 you can buy one AMD quad core and GPU in the same package giving you the best performance to render videos. It is something specific for specific customers. No more no less. A little advantage for those people with less money that want a little more.

  • 1:00 Of course the intel is gonna be slower if the system is lacking a dedicated GPU!

  • @KaikuPen yes...they eat shit, they live only with lies...shame on you amd

  • Enough... I'll buy intel.

  • Jumping ship to intel as soon as Ivy Bridge lands, sick of your lies AMD!

  • @SqueeksoAo how is this video a lie? I've got a sandybridge laptop and a llano laptop. The llano laptop was hundreds of dollars cheaper and 2 to 3 times as fast

  • @asillynoob Bulldozer. :(

  • @SqueeksoAo Well Ivy bridge and Pile driver meant to be a lot more competitive than bulldozer/Sandy bridge. But i'm waiting till then too.

    Currently running an old intel core 2 duo (e8400) its seems to handle Skyrim and Starcraft 2 fine lol..

  • @SqueeksoAo I still have hopes for Piledriver, but yeah, once Ivy Bridge comes out I'm probably going to get one.

  • @SqueeksoAo At least AMDs lies are better than Intel's lies!

  • @SqueeksoAo How is this lies? It shows the difference using Vreveal and using AMD's Fusion APU with GPU acceleration, and not using GPU acceleration.

  • @SqueeksoAo

    ivy go death at new APU with southern island IGP

  • @SqueeksoAo Hehe good one

  • Where is the Graphic card for the intel system :::: this is falase  Comparsion

  • intel core i5-2520m has 2cores

  • so fake that you must be stupid to believe this bullshit

  • AMD FTW <3

  • Looks cool, only one thing. Have you read the small print at the end? Someone needs to check their grammar. “while the while the”

  • AMD where is the next gen bulldozer?

  • @ylulnlulsYx1 APU w/ Cores Bulldozer! \õ 

  • the fuck, allways the amd processor is faster than intel in their videos...but in other reviews is slower....

  • @tz19962007 lol true

  • @tz19962007 with an AMD GPU and CPU, it's faster.

  • @00101110o i do not compared gpu... i've compared 2 cpu

  • @tz19962007 AMD GPUs help with some amount of processing.

  • @00101110o ok but why they didn't put a dedicated gpu for intel? they've know if they put it, even a dual core intel would kicked their asses

  • @tz19962007 nvidia doesn't have the same thing going with intel nor does an AMD GPU work the same as it would with an intel CPU.

  • @00101110o google what means dedicated gpu...you are talking about integrated gpu in cpu...and if that so, why they didn't compare with an intel core i7-2720QM(quad core)rather than a dual core....

  • @tz19962007 what's more, the i5 should have its own integrated gpu which intel claims to co-process much like a dedicated AMD CPU/GPU.

  • @tz19962007 Well, the thing is that AMD shows what they are good at. And that is rendering and gpu acceleration. If you compare cpus at the same price intel and amd are very much alike except for the bulldozer - becouse the bulldozer is just crap. But Intel is much better at singel threaded applications. AMD is not lying. if you try yourselves you will get the same results as in this video. But that doesn't mean that it's an overall better cpu. And what I can recall AMD never claimed that either

  • @tz19962007 amd isnt lieng, your seeing different tests. certain amd cpus do preform much bettter than intels. just like alot of intels preform bettter than amds. but intel charges double

  • @tz19962007 Yeah because Intel was showing how shit their P4 was when it was getting spanked. This video shows the advantage of using GPU acceleration in programs like Vreveal.

  • @tz19962007

    AMD APU IGP vs. intel are drunk

  • @tz19962007 That's because most of these videos from AMD are all GPU based tests, and they're not CPU dependant. AMD's onboard graphics are better than Intel's, which is understandable considering they own ATI. In terms of sheer performance, Intel has been ahead for ages now. Even the first generation i5's outperform the X6's.

  • @tomtomtom843 that's true

  • @tz19962007 na I think this time its for real, maybe that happens at the desktop segment but not at the notebook segment, not a fan boy just saying from experience :)

  • @tz19962007 idiot, the A6 series crossfire with the GPU! Makeing it faster!

  • @Cimon88 don't be such a fanboy, think logical! allways the amd test are based more on gpu rather than cpu. they must compare it with same hardware and running cpu test much more and they compared now a dual core with a quad core... of course the AMD APU is faster in this situation and it has a better integrated gpu

  • @tz19962007

    the HT Applications are a trouble for, it slow down AMD CPUs...

    That same APU (CPU + GPU) is faster than 4 core i5 without HT + this GPU.

    Then it is certainly a joke, recite what you are here so intel fanboy drivel.

  • AMD Forzawin.

    Like if you see what I did there. :)

  • AMD 4eva

  • @AlpineLV Faboys....

  • @UrHideless FAIL

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more