Since I'm not a sports photographer, and I take my time to set up and compose my photos, my 3 fps DSLR does just fine. Plus, my lenses are FAR better than these. But people who think faster is better, here's the camera for you.
@fretman67 i'm sure our difference among what is considered semi pro and pro is little these days. d7000 is perhaps all everyone want. go to... freedslr . com remove spaces and get the chance to win a Brand New Nikon D7000
I guarantee you most of the people on here bashing this camera is because they spent $2,000 on a Nikon camera, and now they're pissed off because it doesn't perform like this. Don't get me wrong, I have a Canon Rebel Xs, but I don't hate Nikon, I never understood the whole Nikon vs. Canon, people have different preferences, don't like it, that sucks, get over it.
You'll find a lot of people who only find confidence in their beliefs through bashing those who think differently or convincing others to think like they do. Quite simply, they're insecure and gutless.
If you want to save some money or just get a better profit margin, get this $5000+ camera brand NEW for just over $2000 at alibaba.com/products/eos_1ds_mark_3/US----------------------------(.)html
This might make some Canon fanboys wet their pants but unless you know what you're actually doing, an 11 FPS camera will only get you 11 BAD SHOTS PER SECOND.
the problem with the d3s compared to the 1d mark iv, is that while it has 51 points, only 15 of them are crosstype, meaning more shots might be soft at a fast burst sequence, but the 1d mk iv has 39 high precision crosstype points at f/2.8, and even the mk iii has 19. btw, will you nikofags pleaseeeee stop bragging about the 1+ fps on the d3, and also its in DX crop mode, 5.1mp with NO autofocus
you can get a hasselblad with a nice lens and a digital back and take shitty pictures.
i know some guy in the filipines that takes really good pictures (in terms of composition) on a nokia camera phone. but there comes the little shitheads that say "nikon 11fps :D"
To all the people asking why-- this is not a camera to take pictures of your aunt's birthday party with, it's a professional camera marketed specifically to sports photographers and other situations where the quality of pictures vastly outweighs the cost of the camera. I'm only a student photojournalist, but I burst with my camera whenever I'm shooting sports because even one or two amazing shots is worth filling a memory card or two.
Do it. I love my 7D. I got some amazing action shots from a swim meet a few weeks ago with it. (I have the links in my channel if you're interested in seeing them.) But yeah, you should get it! :)
@soysaucenwasabi my friend, the dslr world is that most people start with an entry level camera. In the case of Canon users, they start with 300d, 350d, 400d, 500d, (now the new 550d) or the very entry level 1000d, and are happy with them. Some people eventually opt for more advanced models for the extra functions, shooting abilities, the cameras provide. I started with a 400d, which I carried to top of mountains (snowy condition), and bottom of the ocean (with a casing).
@soysaucenwasabi Then like others, I save up enough and opt for a 5D MKII. It was great for a nearly a year, but eventually it lacks something. For one, it is impractical for leisure use because I must carry an external flash for night use, and it isn't fast enough for motorsports scenes. With a 7D, same bulk and weight, I don't have to carry an external flash for leisure use, and it shoots extremely fast at this price. Convenience, is why many people go from higher models to lesser models.
@joshfontanella ironically, i'm 15 too, and I always share lenses with my dad XD, I always take his 17-40mm f/4 L, that lens is just lovely (like it more than the 100-400mm L) and btw, I think that the rebels are discontinued (550D or lower), or atleast not supported by cannon anymore, you can still get the 50D or the 60D, I would preffer the 60D for the newer tecnologies, but the 50D has a magnesium alloy body, making it weather resistant (just like the 5D mkII and 30D, and also the 1D mk III)
I'm Nikon guy, and I get it. Because in any given situation you might get a few moments to get "the shot" .By being able to shoot in such a rapid fashion, you get a good chance of getting not just "the shot" but a few other good images.
Its not that you are trying to capture somthing so many times, its that the shutter is so fast in order to catch an object in motion, and to make sure you have "the perfect shot" the camera can continuously shoot. If you were trying to capture a baseball being hurled but you want the shot to "stop the ball" having a fast shutter evectively sstops the ball in the picture. The number of "clicks" is to ensure you get the picture; the speed of the shutter is to stop motion.
@knarleysurfer54. if you're shooting someone standing still, then there is definitely no point of shooting in burst. But shooting at fast paced movements trying to stop the motion then "shooting something that fast so many times" is perfectly relevant.
agree I have a few cameras and one of those was my first , a 350 or xt and sometimes I take it while going for a walk and still it amazes me how a very little camera with a fragile build can take some pretty good shots , of course I don't use the kit lens, but still is an xt
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
WHICH POINT AND SHOOT CAMERA SHOULD I BUY AROUND 180-220EURO ???? PowerShot SX 110 IS OR FUJIFILM F 100FD IS BETTER??? GIVE ME SOME HELP AND IDEAS THNX
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Can 1DIII shoot at 11fps at all?So who cares if it can autofocus at 10fps, 10 aint 11 last time I checked! And in any case D3 shoots at 9fps, not cropped, with AF, and at highter resolution than 1D3. Besides with all the AF problems it had...
Umm...yes? If you have it set up for someone winding their fastball and you have 10 pictures of his motion, you can pick the best of the photos and wind up with better photos. It's definitely better if you know what you're doing, but isn't a substitute for bad composition. It just helps with timing.
@shledron It actually does if you're in professional sports/nature photography because you can capture multiple pictures of objects that are moving quickly...
Sounds nice... but.. uh.. try to do that in RAW with noise control on and see how many frames you'll get then. Shooting fast in JPG is one thing, but being able to shoot fast in RAW at, or over 8fps with noise control(s) on, is a whole different story. When the 1D3 can do that for more than 40 (RAW) frames at a time.. get back to me ;)
how many are in focus? Canon still have a problem with focusing even after they've done the sub-mirror fix and upgraded the software. C'mon Canon we do not need a $4500 paper weight!
after that comment i would assume you like nikon. even though i have a 40d i sell slr's at best buy and i know nikon is behind canon in many aspects of camera developement.
trust me when i say im not biased. but it is my job to take photos and the pros im around, even the ones with nikons, say they have, or will be switching to canon. can you explain that one?
well in terms of technology, it's for sure that Canon's more advanced than Nikon
But at the same time, Canon are holding their technology at high prices while Nikon allow users to enjoy their technology with a cheaper price than going for Canon
well thats obvious. but canon has little things like free rentals of multi-thousand dollar lenses at sporting events, which for a commercial sports photographer, is rather handy.
Its no point in having such a high frames per second rating on a PRO camera when you cant shoot that fast in RAW and any Pro photographer would know this.
the POINT of high speed is stuff like sport photography where you wanna catch everything. and 3 fps just dont cut it. im pretty sure pro sport photographers either get ultra high speed cards, or just shoot jpegs.
both are great brands with great cameras,and i have respect for both of them,though i have never personally tried this camera,i was reffering simply to the burst speed,wich is a bit faster on D3 :P
Haha! Yeah, there's no doubt that both companies have an edge over each other when it comes to certain things. If only we could combine the best features of both Canon and Nikon, that would be enough to make EVERY single photographer in the world happy!!! Ha!
geez that's fast - I can't see that being very useful - they need to make it take pictures before you push the button like they do with the HVX video camera that way you don't miss the moment.
I have a mark III - it is a piece of shit. A waste of $5500 to have to shot almost twice as many frames just to get something sharp. Service is even more a joke CPS stands for can't provide shit - thanks for not fixing it yet after 8 months
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
shut the fuck up. i've dealt with canon on more than on ocassion and they don't get anything done. i sold all my gear from canon and turned to nikon. better product, better service. FUCK YOU god damn stupid kid, go take your myspace pictures with your nonexistant camera
Thanks Chuck for that little demo.. I just got word that the MkIII is undergoing yet another AF problem fix.. I'm just giving up on a MkIII body and I'll wait for a MkIV, which I am fully expecting to be 12MP, FF, and at least 8fps! a native iso 100 - 3200 is what I need most.. but I wouldn't mind 6400 + iso either.. :-)
i hear everyone back up their arguments by talking all about functions, settings, and menus, but i rarely every here anybody talk about the image quality.
and, correct me if i'm wrong, but isn't a picture itself more important than how you get it? and besides, experiences photographers will tell you that the image quality on nikon and canon is pretty much the same given the price range
If everyone stopped focusing on what camera is better (they're quite equal to be honest), and put more attention on their own photography skills, they may get better results ;)
have you heard of digital cameras, that have manual settings? including being able to do everything manually? the only difference is what media you are using. "noob"
you're a fucking moron. we all know you're some gear-whore kid who doesnt even own an SLR, let alone a Mark III. tell me this, are you going to be manually focusing at a sports game or a bicycle race? Uh... didn't think so dipshit.
i was looking at side by side pics, mkIII and D3, and the D3's AF seemed more accurate, although a lil slower than the mk iii. Personally i would get a d3 if the lenses were the same quality, nikkor vs L.
Wow so that's the sound that a poor kid, with face covered with blood, in one of African countries hear when a "photographer" tries "burst mode" on him/her? How inspiring, perhaps one of 1467 frames will succeed at World Press Photo?
"Well, right now, none. But, the comment didn't associate cost to the quality or speed comparison. Within 5 years, there will be video cameras capable of shooting SLR quality for less than $5K." Says and expert... Haha, what a dumbass. WTF do you do for a living?
koolgiy do you know ANYTHING about cameras? two different classes of cameras here. The AF, Noise control, dynamic range,burst speed,is better, it's a weather sealed, metal body... etc. The only thing on paper that the d80 is "better" at is .1 (a tenth) of a megapixel of higher resolution, which is a marketing gimmick anyway. I also own a D80, which I enjoy, but it is not a better camera, it is designed for consumers and is a great value for $1000, I would trade it for a this in a heartbeat.
@BurninC4rtrage A flashlight does
ThePhotory 4 months ago
Hey, i got my Mark III yesterday an I don't know how to do 10 frames/sec .... when i hold on the button, the camera shot 1 picture.
Witch settings i have to change??
StephaneXD 6 months ago
@StephaneXD At the top of the camera you should see a AF.DRIVE button and move the ring dial to you see squares with a h near it.
MrGeckolizard 6 months ago
@MrGeckolizard thank's a lot!!
StephaneXD 6 months ago
0:08 what is that box on the side of the camera body? is that a external battery? Nice
MultiDetroit69 8 months ago
Since I'm not a sports photographer, and I take my time to set up and compose my photos, my 3 fps DSLR does just fine. Plus, my lenses are FAR better than these. But people who think faster is better, here's the camera for you.
MonkeyManBlues 9 months ago
sounds like a chopper gunner from COD
LaxGod1212 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Used: from $2,149.00
New:$6,999.95 in cheapandgoodus dot com
2521noom 9 months ago
MACHHIINNNEEEE GUUUN!
Emopunk666 9 months ago
@fretman67 i'm sure our difference among what is considered semi pro and pro is little these days. d7000 is perhaps all everyone want. go to... freedslr . com remove spaces and get the chance to win a Brand New Nikon D7000
delilahnelsonnt 10 months ago
how do you pump up the rate like that?
deone135 10 months ago
it sounds like my grandpas car:))
razor1black1 1 year ago
@razor1black1 i think your grandpa needs to go to a mechanic mate
benknowsbest1 7 months ago
I guarantee you most of the people on here bashing this camera is because they spent $2,000 on a Nikon camera, and now they're pissed off because it doesn't perform like this. Don't get me wrong, I have a Canon Rebel Xs, but I don't hate Nikon, I never understood the whole Nikon vs. Canon, people have different preferences, don't like it, that sucks, get over it.
HiHi1013 1 year ago 2
@HiHi1013
You'll find a lot of people who only find confidence in their beliefs through bashing those who think differently or convincing others to think like they do. Quite simply, they're insecure and gutless.
GetOverHere83 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
you people need to get a life
polzowatel 1 year ago
Lol
negativefps 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
$2000 brand new Canon EOS 1Ds Mark 3 at
alibaba.com/product-free/111723120/EOS_1Ds_Mark_3.html
ColdCypher 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If you want to save some money or just get a better profit margin, get this $5000+ camera brand NEW for just over $2000 at alibaba.com/products/eos_1ds_mark_3/US----------------------------(.)html
Notice the ( ).
Have a good day
ColdCypher 1 year ago
Hahaha, the salesman at the end. What a porsche....
ludwigskanal 1 year ago
This might make some Canon fanboys wet their pants but unless you know what you're actually doing, an 11 FPS camera will only get you 11 BAD SHOTS PER SECOND.
Spike2thewest 1 year ago
i love this shit
sound like a m4 :D
freedomforpersia 1 year ago
oh ah! eee! i... just jizzed...
666murdamurdajesus 1 year ago
wicked laugh lol
senerru 1 year ago
I'd laugh as horny as that too if I'd had that cam in my hands.
MarcHaers 1 year ago
the problem with the d3s compared to the 1d mark iv, is that while it has 51 points, only 15 of them are crosstype, meaning more shots might be soft at a fast burst sequence, but the 1d mk iv has 39 high precision crosstype points at f/2.8, and even the mk iii has 19. btw, will you nikofags pleaseeeee stop bragging about the 1+ fps on the d3, and also its in DX crop mode, 5.1mp with NO autofocus
HelloNewYorkCity 1 year ago
you can get a hasselblad with a nice lens and a digital back and take shitty pictures.
i know some guy in the filipines that takes really good pictures (in terms of composition) on a nokia camera phone. but there comes the little shitheads that say "nikon 11fps :D"
HelloNewYorkCity 1 year ago
sweet!
Xyb3rTeCh 1 year ago
faster than a machinegun
polerx3 1 year ago
Fast !
andrest2003 1 year ago
LOOL
dozerbrake 2 years ago
drdrdrdrdrdrdrdr ... hehehehehe :D
Proceed1992 2 years ago 13
To all the people asking why-- this is not a camera to take pictures of your aunt's birthday party with, it's a professional camera marketed specifically to sports photographers and other situations where the quality of pictures vastly outweighs the cost of the camera. I'm only a student photojournalist, but I burst with my camera whenever I'm shooting sports because even one or two amazing shots is worth filling a memory card or two.
askj113 2 years ago 9
@ askj113. well said.
rabbitonstilts 2 years ago 2
works for me shooting motorsports! can't afford one thought....currently looking at 7D's 8 frames per sec capability.
golferchin76 2 years ago
@golferchin
Do it. I love my 7D. I got some amazing action shots from a swim meet a few weeks ago with it. (I have the links in my channel if you're interested in seeing them.) But yeah, you should get it! :)
IntensePizza 1 year ago
@IntensePizza i am almost there, I have all the EF lenses and the investment on 7D's body isn't that expensive.
golferchin76 1 year ago
@golferchin76 The 7d isn't worth it. Add a few more bucks for a 5d mk II. Once you go full frame.... anything less is lame.
soysaucenwasabi 1 year ago
@soysaucenwasabi my friend, the dslr world is that most people start with an entry level camera. In the case of Canon users, they start with 300d, 350d, 400d, 500d, (now the new 550d) or the very entry level 1000d, and are happy with them. Some people eventually opt for more advanced models for the extra functions, shooting abilities, the cameras provide. I started with a 400d, which I carried to top of mountains (snowy condition), and bottom of the ocean (with a casing).
golferchin76 1 year ago
@soysaucenwasabi Then like others, I save up enough and opt for a 5D MKII. It was great for a nearly a year, but eventually it lacks something. For one, it is impractical for leisure use because I must carry an external flash for night use, and it isn't fast enough for motorsports scenes. With a 7D, same bulk and weight, I don't have to carry an external flash for leisure use, and it shoots extremely fast at this price. Convenience, is why many people go from higher models to lesser models.
golferchin76 1 year ago
@soysaucenwasabi agreed, full frame is just excellent for just about everything. Since I used my dad's 5D mkII, I dont want to use my 30D anymore :(
unidigistudios 1 year ago
@unidigistudios thats exactly what i do but i dont have a 30d. i want to get an eos 550d (im only 15) but well share lenses ;)
joshfontanella 1 year ago
@joshfontanella ironically, i'm 15 too, and I always share lenses with my dad XD, I always take his 17-40mm f/4 L, that lens is just lovely (like it more than the 100-400mm L) and btw, I think that the rebels are discontinued (550D or lower), or atleast not supported by cannon anymore, you can still get the 50D or the 60D, I would preffer the 60D for the newer tecnologies, but the 50D has a magnesium alloy body, making it weather resistant (just like the 5D mkII and 30D, and also the 1D mk III)
unidigistudios 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
What's the point of shooting something that fast so many times?
knarleysurfer54 2 years ago
I'm Nikon guy, and I get it. Because in any given situation you might get a few moments to get "the shot" .By being able to shoot in such a rapid fashion, you get a good chance of getting not just "the shot" but a few other good images.
stavrophotography 2 years ago 3
Its not that you are trying to capture somthing so many times, its that the shutter is so fast in order to catch an object in motion, and to make sure you have "the perfect shot" the camera can continuously shoot. If you were trying to capture a baseball being hurled but you want the shot to "stop the ball" having a fast shutter evectively sstops the ball in the picture. The number of "clicks" is to ensure you get the picture; the speed of the shutter is to stop motion.
PilotUTA 2 years ago 3
@knarleysurfer54. if you're shooting someone standing still, then there is definitely no point of shooting in burst. But shooting at fast paced movements trying to stop the motion then "shooting something that fast so many times" is perfectly relevant.
j0vencio 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Big deal, now you have 100 pictures of well, nothing. I wonder if these salesmen ever even walked out to make some photos.
kzrick188 2 years ago
That thing is so much fun to shoot with!
yamarider28 2 years ago
OH MY GOD !!
I wish I can have it right now !!
ftounirayan 2 years ago
sweeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeet
pitomlot 2 years ago 3
dream wich will newer comes to my hand
Fintx007 2 years ago 4
Comment removed
tmaidtony 2 years ago
hahahahahahahaha the end is so sweeet
Rav13r 2 years ago
hahahaha
profineger 2 years ago
the body and lens are merely accessories to the photographer.
XfreeXskierX31X 2 years ago 6
agree I have a few cameras and one of those was my first , a 350 or xt and sometimes I take it while going for a walk and still it amazes me how a very little camera with a fragile build can take some pretty good shots , of course I don't use the kit lens, but still is an xt
iggie950 2 years ago
Don't know if this has been answered or not yet, but what's that thing on the right side of the 40D? External battery pack? Wireless remote?
instantvoid 2 years ago
wireless file transfer. sends the picts to your computer.
Undergroundphoto 2 years ago
This is a 1D mkIII not a 40D. It's a wireless file transmitter (maybe the Canon WFT-E2A Wireless File Transmitter)
ptrefftz 2 years ago
sounds like a diesel truck at idle lol
ARR016a 2 years ago 6
I really hate people arguing the speed of cameras like how much greater 11 is than 10. Who cares?
all4golf 2 years ago 6
WTF
C211000 2 years ago
Whats the lens on again???
MohammedAlAssiri 2 years ago
Canon 16-35mm 2.8L
all4golf 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
canons suck. Nikon is much better. The D3 owns this
rockerman246 2 years ago
ure mum sucks hard
blod5 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
his penis is very small....
keviiino 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
WHICH POINT AND SHOOT CAMERA SHOULD I BUY AROUND 180-220EURO ???? PowerShot SX 110 IS OR FUJIFILM F 100FD IS BETTER??? GIVE ME SOME HELP AND IDEAS THNX
purepleasure7 2 years ago
CHUCK! CHUCK! CHUCK!
skingrafter 2 years ago
holy shit it´s lika a Machine gun
werghag 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
check out my website store for great cameras and more
DFWStreets 3 years ago
the best camera on the world.. Only Canon have power!
janqSeven 3 years ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
It's funny you say that because the Nikon D3 shoots 11 fps, while this camera shoots 10.
TenaciousLevi 3 years ago
Yeah, and it's funny you try to rank on the Mark III when the D3 will only shoot at 11fps when it's in 5.1mp DX crop mode, AND the AF won't operate.
Mhmm, definitely impressive...
infamousgarbanzo 3 years ago 35
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Can 1DIII shoot at 11fps at all?So who cares if it can autofocus at 10fps, 10 aint 11 last time I checked! And in any case D3 shoots at 9fps, not cropped, with AF, and at highter resolution than 1D3. Besides with all the AF problems it had...
Shumeshi 2 years ago
Does it help you to take better photos? No. Can have the latest and greatest and still take absolute crap.
shledron 2 years ago 43
amen. whenever i see canon/nikon bashing, this quote always comes to mind
"shooting nikon doesnt make you a photographer - it makes you a nikon user"
ravemissioneight 2 years ago 4
@shledron but by god you'll look pro walking around with one of those haha
StuartHaight 1 year ago
@shledron True, but 10fps is an AMAZING tool for sports photographers!
basilthefox 1 year ago
@basilthefox thats exactly what i was thinking, this is loads better for action. high fps is a dream for skate photography
Wiscompton608 1 year ago
@shledron
Umm...yes? If you have it set up for someone winding their fastball and you have 10 pictures of his motion, you can pick the best of the photos and wind up with better photos. It's definitely better if you know what you're doing, but isn't a substitute for bad composition. It just helps with timing.
123IOWNALL321 8 months ago
@shledron & i know a few of those hahah!
stefanau7 7 months ago
@shledron It actually does if you're in professional sports/nature photography because you can capture multiple pictures of objects that are moving quickly...
SavingPrivateBrian 3 months ago
nice replay i got the mark||| but im planing on taking a hasselblad but i think its a big risk :S
MohammedAlAssiri 2 years ago
Comment removed
rustynasty143 2 years ago
LMAO!! That is too cool, now I want one.
RobWT62 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This is a camera for impotent,fat,middle aged men HAHAHAHA
mikongo 3 years ago
lol what do u have powershot?? lmao
loser...
ZLARZ123 3 years ago
8.5 inches you fat worm zlars - is that like a womans name? Maybe you don't have one at all.
mikongo 3 years ago
good job reading my name
i actually have no S in my username you
ignorant bastard powershot user
ZLARZ123 3 years ago
But you agree you ARE a fat worm Zlars HAHAHAHA
mikongo 3 years ago
lol sure if u think 160 lbs for a guy that is 6'2 fat then yes?
ZLARZ123 3 years ago
Okay okay...you win, you're a thin worm then Zlars.
mikongo 3 years ago
nice smile at the end...
xmanxman80 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Yawn.. another "Digital" wanna be camera... in 2 years I'll give you $200 for it and I'll lose out. Get a real camera.... NIKON F4
ibimw 3 years ago
woahahahahhahahahahahaha! hahaahahaha. machine gun!
zainalalieff 3 years ago 2
Ha!! Your mans face at the end is brill..
HAAA
Spanish4Point4 3 years ago
hahaahh that lough at the end.
:)
maltijien 3 years ago 3
That sounds like gunfire
Blid182 3 years ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
Canon EOS 1Ds Mark III only $2000 DLL USA NEW WHIT LENS..NICE
easycashfactory 3 years ago
sounds like a ... GUN!
iceman9493 3 years ago
Holy cow... My 400D is, hmm, pretty slow compared to this x)
pastori70 3 years ago 2
my camera(Canon XSI) is shit compared to this camera!
WhoTownBoy 3 years ago 5
my camera(Canon XSI) is shit compared to this camera!
But i still love my camera i take some amazing photos with it.
msotelo09 3 years ago 4
holy shit! :D i thought my 30D is a machine gun :)
FaziastyPL 3 years ago 2
agreed
lepexi 3 years ago
Sounds nice... but.. uh.. try to do that in RAW with noise control on and see how many frames you'll get then. Shooting fast in JPG is one thing, but being able to shoot fast in RAW at, or over 8fps with noise control(s) on, is a whole different story. When the 1D3 can do that for more than 40 (RAW) frames at a time.. get back to me ;)
teiladay 3 years ago
FACK MAN...
Andseb25 3 years ago
hahaha i really enjoyed how he is lauging :D whats that lens? 24-70 ?
FlowChilloR 3 years ago
it seems to wide at the front to be that, it could be a 17-40...*-)
jegheterx 3 years ago
or a 16-35
randyp1234567 3 years ago
Yeaa, and here's me with my new Nikon D60 :D
Garak1 3 years ago
Sick! Blows the D3 out of the water in AF tests now too!
sx6db1v5rk2j4ch 3 years ago
It sounds like a sewing machine.
oisiaa 3 years ago 4
lol i betcha my 30D is sayin " i wanna be just like you when i grow up" to the 1D xD, but i still love my 30D
Benthaitakeaway 3 years ago
A camera this good is the inspiration for me to succeed at life :P
montymintypie 3 years ago 2
I think My Nikon D80 just ran away LOL
Skullhuntre 3 years ago 5
really fast, btw guys laugh was great :D
concussiona2f 3 years ago 2
totally agree, nikon is not bad my hasselblad is better, i use eos 1d mark||| and 1dsmark|||
jjtwintip 3 years ago
you've got to be kidding me. i've read this thing was fast. but the speed on this is absolutely ridiculous.
beastmaster112 3 years ago
i'm hit...
sgnx 3 years ago 3
yo tengo la II
:D
pinoxomentiroso 3 years ago
how many are in focus? Canon still have a problem with focusing even after they've done the sub-mirror fix and upgraded the software. C'mon Canon we do not need a $4500 paper weight!
dranrebnor 3 years ago
after that comment i would assume you like nikon. even though i have a 40d i sell slr's at best buy and i know nikon is behind canon in many aspects of camera developement.
lepexi 3 years ago
yep, yet nikon's 'marketing skills' allows Nikon users to buy their technology with a relatively cheaper price than Canon.
HKMoo 3 years ago 2
trust me when i say im not biased. but it is my job to take photos and the pros im around, even the ones with nikons, say they have, or will be switching to canon. can you explain that one?
lepexi 3 years ago
well in terms of technology, it's for sure that Canon's more advanced than Nikon
But at the same time, Canon are holding their technology at high prices while Nikon allow users to enjoy their technology with a cheaper price than going for Canon
HKMoo 3 years ago
well thats obvious. but canon has little things like free rentals of multi-thousand dollar lenses at sporting events, which for a commercial sports photographer, is rather handy.
lepexi 3 years ago
Its no point in having such a high frames per second rating on a PRO camera when you cant shoot that fast in RAW and any Pro photographer would know this.
amylouisejenkins 3 years ago
the POINT of high speed is stuff like sport photography where you wanna catch everything. and 3 fps just dont cut it. im pretty sure pro sport photographers either get ultra high speed cards, or just shoot jpegs.
fi3re 3 years ago 4
im sorry,but nikon D3 pwns this camera
eLeMeNtdserv 3 years ago
The D3 is probably up there with this one, maybe a bit better... but the 1Ds Mark III certainly poops on your little D3. ;)
Mordecai36 3 years ago 3
:P
possibly true
both are great brands with great cameras,and i have respect for both of them,though i have never personally tried this camera,i was reffering simply to the burst speed,wich is a bit faster on D3 :P
eLeMeNtdserv 3 years ago
Haha! Yeah, there's no doubt that both companies have an edge over each other when it comes to certain things. If only we could combine the best features of both Canon and Nikon, that would be enough to make EVERY single photographer in the world happy!!! Ha!
Mordecai36 3 years ago
That would be awsome!
eLeMeNtdserv 3 years ago
Sounds like a diesel engine :D
speedbird1229 3 years ago
Nikon D3 can do 11 fps, 51 AF points, 12 MP, 25,600 ISO, 1x crop factor instead of 10fps, 45 AF points, 10 MP, 6400 ISO, 1.3x crop factor. Nikon rules!
warrock556 4 years ago
Note, it's only 9fps at full resolution.
mikepaco1 3 years ago
geez that's fast - I can't see that being very useful - they need to make it take pictures before you push the button like they do with the HVX video camera that way you don't miss the moment.
Dlachm1 4 years ago
I have a mark III - it is a piece of shit. A waste of $5500 to have to shot almost twice as many frames just to get something sharp. Service is even more a joke CPS stands for can't provide shit - thanks for not fixing it yet after 8 months
smilebeeatch 4 years ago
Thats what you get for being a photographer wannabe!Amateur bitch know thy place!!!!
fakestuff1 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
shut the fuck up. i've dealt with canon on more than on ocassion and they don't get anything done. i sold all my gear from canon and turned to nikon. better product, better service. FUCK YOU god damn stupid kid, go take your myspace pictures with your nonexistant camera
thejarred89 3 years ago
AMATEUR!!!
fakestuff1 3 years ago 7
Thanks Chuck for that little demo.. I just got word that the MkIII is undergoing yet another AF problem fix.. I'm just giving up on a MkIII body and I'll wait for a MkIV, which I am fully expecting to be 12MP, FF, and at least 8fps! a native iso 100 - 3200 is what I need most.. but I wouldn't mind 6400 + iso either.. :-)
jpwisconsin 4 years ago
hi~
i have 1 EOS 1D Mark III
is just like a machine gun~
narutokalvin 4 years ago
The great thing about the D3 is its low light performance (image quality etc) especially at High Iso's thats why I'm getting one over the Mk3
natswoo 4 years ago
these nikon vs. canon debates are funny
i hear everyone back up their arguments by talking all about functions, settings, and menus, but i rarely every here anybody talk about the image quality.
and, correct me if i'm wrong, but isn't a picture itself more important than how you get it? and besides, experiences photographers will tell you that the image quality on nikon and canon is pretty much the same given the price range
alexoyle 4 years ago 3
machine gun and a oldfartsoldier
jashloser 4 years ago 5
If everyone stopped focusing on what camera is better (they're quite equal to be honest), and put more attention on their own photography skills, they may get better results ;)
WarrenWilliams 4 years ago 21
i would literally KILL for that camera...
GoJohnyGoGoGoGo 4 years ago
Why though, it's a professional camera. You only want it so you look more professional.
simargl 4 years ago 2
Its fast but there are SERIOUS problems with the AF, be smart, get the D3
Shutterguy 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Be smart and do it manually noob.
SgtRevan 4 years ago
have you heard of digital cameras, that have manual settings? including being able to do everything manually? the only difference is what media you are using. "noob"
Shutterguy 4 years ago 3
nooblet city
mattwier 4 years ago
you're a fucking moron. we all know you're some gear-whore kid who doesnt even own an SLR, let alone a Mark III. tell me this, are you going to be manually focusing at a sports game or a bicycle race? Uh... didn't think so dipshit.
thejarred89 3 years ago
that's because we can't aford to buy one.
pols1985 4 years ago
you're not a pro, you don't need one.
thejarred89 3 years ago
no? you don't think the d300 or the nikon d3 could compete or is in the same line of the eos 1ds mark III?
I wanted a nikon (something affordable and great in low light) and my friend continues to brag about the nikon... I was almost persuaded to get it...
jackies35 4 years ago
i was looking at side by side pics, mkIII and D3, and the D3's AF seemed more accurate, although a lil slower than the mk iii. Personally i would get a d3 if the lenses were the same quality, nikkor vs L.
dhmanic 4 years ago 3
Just hope that little auto focus problem's been fixed.
crispycritterz 4 years ago
d80 is obvious a completely different camera and isn't even meant to compete in the similar market to this camera.
whereas the d3 on the other hand, is equal if not superior to this
poondrive64mb 4 years ago
So far it seems superior, and it's not based on specs only, quite a few people have already had a chance to try it.
Shumeshi 4 years ago
wooooooooooow !
sinhack12 4 years ago
Wow so that's the sound that a poor kid, with face covered with blood, in one of African countries hear when a "photographer" tries "burst mode" on him/her? How inspiring, perhaps one of 1467 frames will succeed at World Press Photo?
Icheb82 4 years ago
What is with his laugh? Did he just cum in his pants?
mutualfunmanager 4 years ago
oh, ive seen em mate, canon still beats it fps wise, which is what the pros want
Mooorhe 4 years ago
no wonder nikon has no chance in the pro market
Mooorhe 4 years ago
Are you sure?Check the nikon D3 specifics a think again:)
player1CR 4 years ago 3
No chance? Oh, only the chance that many pros may be turning to nikon because of the new D3.
ddcam1 4 years ago
lol go play with your point & shoot. nikon OWNS the pro market you stupid shit.
thejarred89 3 years ago
WTF nikon is utter shite compared to Canon
Benthaitakeaway 3 years ago
Wow, that's beastly.
TheSternMystic 4 years ago
"Well, right now, none. But, the comment didn't associate cost to the quality or speed comparison. Within 5 years, there will be video cameras capable of shooting SLR quality for less than $5K." Says and expert... Haha, what a dumbass. WTF do you do for a living?
hairulfr 4 years ago
koolgiy do you know ANYTHING about cameras? two different classes of cameras here. The AF, Noise control, dynamic range,burst speed,is better, it's a weather sealed, metal body... etc. The only thing on paper that the d80 is "better" at is .1 (a tenth) of a megapixel of higher resolution, which is a marketing gimmick anyway. I also own a D80, which I enjoy, but it is not a better camera, it is designed for consumers and is a great value for $1000, I would trade it for a this in a heartbeat.
adamzx3 4 years ago 2
Just got one of these and I played with it all day and night.
Snoochies 4 years ago
like a machinegun :D
ddlmn 4 years ago