Added: 5 years ago
From: Giaalf
Views: 1,847,189
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (1,122)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • would like to see Lara Fabian do it....

  • sounds kinda Quebecky

  • elle est superbe,Isabelle Boulay!!!!!!!!!!Je t'aime autant!!!!!!

  • 240 are deaf and morons!!!!!!

  • bravo,,,la voix de Edith,,,belle vibration,,,,

  • sucksssssss...

  • She is lovely. Piaf was a dog. I hope Isabelle shaves her armpits ???

  • @MrCagivaman - Isabelle is Canadian; so she probably does.

  • wonderful

  • I like her very much, great voice and beautiful smile.

  • The violin killed it

  • Она прекрасна, но, но, но.. это не голос Эдит.

  • Это не просто шикарная женщина, это ангел!!!

  • This woman's voice is wonderful. The piano is perfect, but the violin drowns out all that is good. The violinists are good, but not for this song. They tried to make it overly grand, but it's not Edith's style, so the song sounds wrong with the extra instruments.

  • The crappy violin intonation ruined this

  • She just perfectly Nailed it..... and with all due respect paid to Edit with this rendition. Bravo..!!

  • I worship you Edith Piaf and Sabelle Boulay not a half bad job. Your accent isn't quite as whorish as Edith's but you should be proud.

  • All I can say is that I'm proud of her for getting the opportunity to stand & sing on a stage like that. That's a BIG deal ! Nice tribute to Piaf. La business de musique est merveilleuse !

  • jaja la renplasaron

  • Quel est le malade qui a arrangé les cordes aussi mal ? Ce pseudo quatuor qui nous couine ses truismes en arpèges. Beurk ! Ils savent vraiment plus quoi aller chercher pour faire Frenchy ... A quand la Galerie des Glaces reconstituée pour un live de Trust ?

  • Not Edith .. but sings it her way wonderfully.

  • That was beautiful.

  • Beautiful job. I think she sings this with all her heart. Don't hate. Her voice is beautiful. It's just NOT Edith. And that is a big DUH. :P

  • luv piaf and mirieille mathieu for singing this because of their passion which is lacking in this performance

  • Only Piaf Mothafukaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa­as NO ONE COMES CLOSE

    FROM NEW YORK WITH LOVE 

  • @Midogroup2008 more like with hate lol

  • Beautiful song and beautiful performer. The female Charles Trenet.

  • the funny thing is this lady is a much better singer than Edith Piaf: just goes to show how little actual talent really matters in today's media consumer mindset. It's about the gimmick, the memorable.

    Examples: Susan Boyle  Birdy Bieber

    All decent singers catapulted to fame by their gimmicks

  • @shakethesh Are you sure?I think Piaf has a stronger voice.To be sure Boulay has a wonderful voice also but I don't believe it is as vibrant as Piaf's.

  • definitely only edith can sing this song....

  • MOI JE LA TROUVE SUPERBE.

  • @tekaya9 moi aussi

  • tout a fait d'accord avec le 2eme commentateur:))))))

  • Une belle interprétation de cette chanson de Piaf intemporel. Je t'aime Isabelle. Merci.

  • this song is from a some movie soundtrack???

  • @chocheymas Inception

  • @chocheymas Recently this track is used in movie 'Inception' as a Trigger to wake characters up from their dream.

  • J'aime beaucoup cette version qu'Isabelle donne de ce méga succès d'Edith Piaf.... cette chanson est intemporelle et le restera .... Merci Isabelle.

  • WDF????

  • edith piaf is better but i don't like the way piaf sings the 'R' sry

  • bravissima

    

  • muy bueno! nya nya!

    

  • Linda interpretação!!!

  • i dont know how old are u but, this version is better than edith's.

  • @iworavnagora Edith Piaf's is the original. Everyone else can only be compared to her. Only Chopin is Chopin. One can come close to but cannot exceed the original.

  • @whaddupmf

    compared with Edith, no offense, I like this version.

  • @iworavnagora I don't know how old you are... but stop telling nonsenses pls...

  • @animaldan this is no nonsense

    wtf is wrong with u?

    why can't u aceppt else appinion?

  • não nao nao sem condições  essa melodia somente edith piaff sem maais

  • She doesn't even get close to Piaf.She has a nice voice but Piaf had an incredible and stunning voice!

  • No. There is another.

  • Fabulous..........Joseph

  • la interpreto muy bien pero le hizo falta algo que solo edith le podia dar pero muy bien de todos modos

  • Hay canciones que solo las puede cantar una persona, y esta solo edith piaf puede, solo a ella se le siente la pasión que esta canción representa

  • qué linda ella.. y qué exigentes! jaja me gusta.. lo hace bien

  • @kotres y seguro los que se quejan canta igual que edith

  • @Rebecky66 eso mismo digo yo. Es una melodia dificil de interpretar. Por supuesto que nadie suena igual que Edith, pero esta chica suena muy bien.

  • @cvt74 hay millones de tesituras, ademas si ella se escuchara como Edith , la gente la tacharia de imitadora ¿crees que me equivoco? jejeje

  • hay muchas cantantes buenas pero nadie como edith piaff para interpretar esta cancion

  • BEAUTIFUL WOMEN GREAT COVER , JUST PERFECT.

  • It is not Isabelle that bothers me, I really think she sings quite OK this famous song (you should never ever compare two artistic interpretations asking the second to equal the first). It's the most unfortunate accompaniment score, the violins and the piano that sound totally out of place...

  • not nearly asmuch passion as Edith has!

  • Very beautiful. well done interpretation, different but beautiful. Edith was perfect. It's a well done version.

  • jai toujours aimer cette chanson !! et avec Isabelle Boulay qui fait hommage a Piaf !! chapeau !! c pas une imitation ici salsillo mais bien un HOMMAGE !!! j'adore !!

  • QUERO ISSO PARA MEU EPITAFIO.

  • meme si elle ne peut remplace Edith Piaff elle chante tres bien:)

  • laissez les gens s'exprimer au lieu de les abattre à chaque fois...

    isabelle boulay est une chanteuse , une vraie, et , en plus, une personne humaine

    J'ai vu un de ses concerts et c'est une femme hyper chaleureuse .....

    ESSAYEZ DE CHANTER COMME ELLE ET ON EN REPARLE APRES OK?

  • it isn't as good as edith piaf's version.this doesn't give you the same sensation edith piaf's does and she can;t sing it correctly.you listen to her and you realise that something isn't right.I believe that all true fans of edith piaf will agree with me.

  • She can sing and she's beautiful but she's no Edith Piaf.

  • Quite a few naysayers here, but apparently Boulay's audience disagrees, and so do I. Her voice is perfect for this song. An outstanding performance. Bravo!!

  • The accent is wrong, the voice is too weak - sorry, dear Isabelle, but you just failed at trying to sing Edith Piaf's greatest song. Please don't try to do it again.

  • obviamente la versión de Edith Piaf gusta más porque fue la primera que se escuchó, pero la versión de Isabelle es igualmente bella, con la diferencia de que Isabelle es una mujer muy bella y le da una interpretación tierna a la canción.

    Qué espectáculo !!

  • very, very week performance :)

  • pretty miserable attempt... shadow of divine Edit will always overwhelm any singer who'll try to cover her..

  • Thumbs up if inception brought u here

  • Es una hermosa cancion, pero solo me gusta como la canta Edtih Piaf. Saludos desde México.

  • APESTA LA QUE CANTA VIVA LA MUSICA TRAANCCE!!!!!!!!!!

  • con todo respeto eres idiota ,imbecil o solo tarada o quizas tambien retardada mental? TU CANCION ES UNA SOBERANA MIIIIIERRRDA!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • She needs more attitude to sing this song right.

  • a valiant effort but it just dont cut it but trying to do a cower version of this is like asking to fail :/

  • elle est pasz au point coincée dans un modele la bonne eleve

  • A stunning beauty with an brilliant voice....bonus!

  • Ohh no the kick!!

  • look at the performance of Cassia Eller ( brazil ) you will change your opinion

  • Pourquoi hair quand l'interpretation etait evidemment un hommage a l'artiste originalle. Isabelle ne fais pas la chanson pour des comparaisons ou pour se prouver supperieure. Elle le fait pour re-actualiser un grand classique. Elle n'a aucune obligation quand a l'interpretation. Elle donnes sa version et je l'aimes beaucoup.

  • @yfrancoeur je suis d´accord avec tois .

  • @yfrancoeur  D'accord!

  • Boa interpretação ... Mas , ninguém se compara a Edith Piaff !!!  ♥

    Alguém sabe onde consigo um download do filme : Piaff- Um hino ao amor . ???

  • good voice but edith piaf is way better !

  • WOW ..

  • justement elle ne tente pas d'imiter Piaf

  • Uma linda mulher, com uma voz sensual e maravilhosa

  • What a veeeeeeery nice Lady!!!! And a beautiful voice!

  • Que belleza de mujer y que hermosa voz!!

  • Moreover, she sings with sensuality, and the meaning of the song is to be strong, not to be pretty or something else.

  • It's impossible to performance this song, i'm sorry. Only Piaf version is valid. She tries, but she can't sing it.

    What a song, my god

  • @salsillo so true, theres none of the heart behind this one.

  • @salsillo though i agree with you, credit where credits due,,, its impossible to do the lady as she was pure genius, but brave to try it, i thought, x

  • @salsillo The difference you are hearing is the improvement in the quality of the recording in stereo vs the recording of Edith Piaff which was all with poor quality mono equipment which gave her a nasal sound that she did not have in real life. Her daughter is everything her mother was in talent and quality and the "Little Sparrow" lives on in this beautiful woman.

  • @salsillo i agree.

  • I don't think she'is doing so bad. It'a quite dificult song

  • Édith pour toujours <3

  • Edith could have sung like this when she was 5.

  • Ninguém canta essa música como Edith. Jamais. Não fosse ela, essa música não estaria nas nossas mentes como está hoje.

  • Essa canção na voz de Isabelle fica mais bonita do que na de Edith. (Excusez moi, mais c'est vrai!)

  • A refreshing interpretation, I personally prefer Edith. (and Rammstein) haha

  • @SandWraith123 yeaah, merci,TX 4 pour le rammstein tip, didn't now, wow!!

  • que bonita cancion

  • Good, but no Edith, of course. ;)

  • fruhling in Paris!

  • @philipgaley Even though i was not a part of the original conversation i am going to do what you do best, give my opinion anyway. No matter how intellectual your answers sound your behavior is similar to a teenager. As a classmate of mine said "Am I right or are you wrong", showing off your brain must give you a sense of superiority which you don't get in real life, or else why would be on youtube 24/7 leaving comments that are long enough to make "war and peace" look like a short story.

  • Fantastico!!!

    

  • Oops, I left out the word "examples." ...insults as I gave examples of a few comments ago...

    Also, I am not insensitive to the ailments of others, whatever they may be, but to throw up your disabilities, and dental condition after piling insults on others is low. You don't know what disabilities they may or may not have. That's it. There will be no more answers from me on this thread.

  • Comment removed

  • You are still excusing your behavior by putting "the other guy" down. It's as I said, you simply blame others never acknowledging your own bad behavior. You seem to have acquired just enough "book learning" to try to hit others over the head with, or to make yourself sound smart to whoever you can fool temporarily.

  • @escritura48 Oh, gosh, I missed your post: 1) the simplest ROG (rules of grammar) require the "temporarily" before the "fool"; 2) You seem: "things are not as they seem"; 3) your "It's as I said" follows such puerile logic as, "And if you don't believe me, I'll say it again."; 4) "without acknowledging your own bad behavior." (without is the correction to never); 5) taking the other guy to have been asleep, I just gave him a simple jab or two, to see whether he'd stand as homo sapiens and get

  • @phillipgaley There's nothing wrong with my grammar. It's perfectly acceptable to put the adverb before or after the verb. "Ran quickly" or "quickly ran"--either one is fine. It would take me hours to mark up your writing, however, it's immaterial on a youtube comment. You are proving my points with your actions. You haven't acknowledged any wrongdoing on your part, but now you're crying elder abuse.

  • @escritura48 I think that, while, to point out the differences which are characteristic of the different age groups as indicators of relative maturity is not "crying elder abuse", it is but one item which stands for your immaturity as regarding a suspect claim of 50yr. on your channel. Nor, do I care much what you do, but just to say that, I done been 20 or 30, without training in use of logic, and, I'm on to ya', . . .

    However, if you would please inform me of wrongdoing, I should be quite ple

  • @phillipgaley The only thing left for me to respond to that I haven't already answered, is to ask how old you think I really am? I vow to tell you my true age whether or not you "guess" right.

  • @escritura48 As before—and for the conflicted reasons given—sensing falseness in play, I kind of lean toward keeping out of the personal arena—so far as I have been made aware of, you have expressed no opinion on Isabelle Boulay's presentation; you appear to have merely dropped in for a momentary entertainment in—at the very least, attempting—to beat up on a tired, disabled, worn out, toof'luss old man, . . . here's to you, kid—hope ya' had fun, . . .

  • @phillipgaley Is wi-fi to be routinely found in the nursing homes nowadays? As for me, I'm just hoping the dorm marm won't catch me up typing after curfew. If you could only see the tears welled up in my eyes as I bear my reproach and regret for having brought pain to such a decrepit one as you must be. I hope my fellow scholars will not be awakened by my sobs. And as for becoming personal, aren't you the one who first expressed question about my stated age?

  • . . . . quite pleased to entertain any constructive opinion.

    As for YT comments being a thing of lesser value or note, in the nature of things, that is a strike against the world's fund of wealth and happiness; for, each thing in it's place is best, and that which appears but idle show, strengthens and supports the rest, simply to say that, nothing useless is or low, but that it is deserving of our best efforts because that which we do, is an expression of the self and what our society has produ

  • . . . . has produced.

    And but of course, you'd have to think carefully—which is where that book larnin' and rubbage with scholars might come in for ya', the constraint there, being, you appear not to be so interested—oh, well, . . . at least, we've found a point or two of basic disagreement, . . . and, your use of the: "And if you don't believe me the first time, I'll say it again." twist to logic, appears to stand as a bar in maintenance of arrested intellectual development—oh, well, . . .

  • . . . . homo sapiens, and get himself out of the traffic. And please rest assured, your opinion will be accorded the full measure of consideration and esteem as it may appear to merit.

    But in all, I sense falseness to be in play: while your channel claims age 50, you claim to be young. But ppl 49+ don't exercise themselves in gratuitous abuse of the elderly because, they themselves, begin to see the light at the end of the tunnel as not so far distant, and well apprehend of the day when they

  • . . . . when they also, will be frail, worn out, toof'lus, and perhaps worthless.

    On YT, one younger man says: "Never listen to anything anyone over 50, says.". But, beside insulating himself against transmission of the fruit of years or knowledge, the younger man reinforces the age boundary, but perhaps never considering that, those 50+ have done been where he is and so, we're on to 'em. Your self-stamped and self-assured sense of rectitude, your weak conceptual constructs, and weak use of the

  • . . . . weak use of the logic of grammar, at least these mark your work as of that of one's youth to be discounted for the latent effects of inexperience.

    While I wouldn't see you marked down for having created a straw channel, for the reasons just given, your offerings are such that, although, as siege thrown up against the experience of age—and thus far unwarranted in reason—they may or may not be worthy of hard entertainment, plainly, they cannot be taken as meritorious of gravity or moment

  • Comment removed

  • . . . . rubbage with scholars; and further, should you attain that which is referred to as the knowledge and experience of age, you might reference for future use when advising the young that, at, say, the 3rd grade level, children begin to think such that, sensing something perhaps touching themselves, they might devise such a turn in subject or topic as: "So, who speaks your reality into existence—Mr. Grownup?", then encouraging them concerning the errors counted against themselves in

  • . . . . against themselves in bridging, expanding, and diffusing, giving examples of each—though, not now to be done in the 500 character limit, . . .

    And, you might have provided at least some bar against gratuitous abuse of me, by comment of your opinion concerning Ms. Boulay's presentation—and should you decide so to do, I do hope that, you'll let me know, . . . I learn too, in opportunities to be made aware of the mental courses of the youth of the nation, . . .

  • You are the one who grouped humor in with the things you (wrongly) deem as weakness/flaw. Here's quoting you: "Also, if one experiences humor, annoyance, irritation, etc., most generally, that is due to their own internal susceptibility or character flaw."

    phillipgaley 1 day ago

  • @escritura48 m-m-m-m, in the conclusions of your rationale, then, if "murder" and "benevolence" are in the same sentence, that is a plain inference to say that, the two words are in the same ontological category, . . . and, need I further to point this up as a manifest discombobulation in logic? The quote then stands on its own if but aided by a comma after "susceptibility" so that, beyond the natural and usual understanding acceptance of any one's weakness, or proclivity, or propensity towards

  • @phillipgaley Everyone is susceptible to humor, annoyance, and irritation; and it is not necessarily a character flaw to experience irritation or annoyance. That's just your way of passing off your own behavior as being someone else's problem rather than taking your own responsibility. I am a native English speaker, with high scores in English, so you don't need to waste our time trying to teach me how the English language works. I'm also not going to waste mine trying to force you to make sense

  • @escritura48 "Thou wilt keep him in perfect peace, whose mind is stayed on thee."; "Stayed upon Jehovah, finding as he promised, perfect peace and rest.".

    But the weak mo which you rely on—and which Wally Carson, of your own state, upon his retirement, was quoted front page in recitation of—comes from the ancient Greek schools of oratory, Francis Bacon used it, but especially in our time, the Moslems and other of the foolish or unlearned: "That which is aggressively asserted and plausible suppo

  • . . . . "That which is aggressively asserted and plausibly supported is the law.". And, by extension, in their cargo cult mentality, many Christians also, use it—they call it "speaking things into existence" (usually, money and health).

    Sadly, they and the many Moslem apologists et al, are simply unable to entertain of the fact that, upon merely saying something is so, doesn't make it so—reality depends, rather, not on what is spoken, but upon who speaks it—if you say: "You're a menace to societ

  • . . . . say: "You're a menace to society.", that's no where near a judge having said so. Although, you would see bad behavior, justified—probably, as normal or natural—use of the Greek rule, can never make it so.

    Naturally, to follow in the Greek mo—logic be damed—you buttress your illogic with: "passing off your own behavior as being someone else's problem rather than taking your own responsibility.", a mere ad hominem thrust.

    Then, insofar as, "I am this, and I am that." is to be of concern

  • @phillipgaley •• @russiangirl0123 Actually, the tonic spread allows greater space for the vocalist—y'need some book larnin', there, Buddy, and some rubbage with scholars, . . ."

    phillipgaley 1 week ago

    @Madved07 Sounds like you're a boring personality and irritable, . . .

    phillipgaley 1 week ago

    @frankluko Sounds like you're just too damned cheap and chinsey—y'gotta spring w'the cash for a decent sound system;

    phillipgaley 1 week ago

    Who's "speaking" your behavior into existence?

  • @escritura48 For each one of these thrusts to dissimilar instance, person, and purpose, which you here recite, than to have made any useful thing of contextual analysis, you sum these into personal invective; and upon which, I kind of wonder if, as is sometimes said, "To each, his own.", your summation isn't characteristic rather, of a somewhat mediocre personality type

    To your own mind, you are free to accept self-justified feelings of annoyance or irritability, though not to me; and in your

  • . . . . in your own mind, while you are free to blink the facts pertaining to the point which was at issue, I would marvel to know of the basis in fact, experience, or psychology by which you are persuaded that, I would traipse along behind as though these simplistic attempts at use of logic made sense—I would say, "your simplistic attempts", except that, that kind of ad hoc thing is the common ground of all illiterate and the otherwise unlearned.

    And while some, I might try to steer toward some

  • . . . . steer toward some form of book-larnin', I kind of wonder if than simple acquisition, your difficulties with the logic of discussion don't have more to do with embrace of a mentality which is somewhat beyond knowledge and logic; and in such regard, I would wish to not waste any more of your time; so, for the most which might be said, I do hope that, you'll have a fun day, . . .

  • . . . . towards, or for items of humor, the comma then unequivocally denoting a distinction between a susceptibility toward something, and anything misshapen in character or personality—comma after something, and for the reason that, as here, character or personality make reference to the same thing holding a flaw, no comma—they are the same, . . .

  • Что за самодеятеятельность. спасибо..

  • Ужасно..

  • Move your hands woman! And say 'je ne' faster.

  • Beautiful

  • Couldn't feel the the sort of combustion which Piaf possessed

  • Singing a signature song of Edith Piaf? I give her points for bravery.

  • for fun: just compare to this

    watch?v=Uid9XvlN64s

    this is girl is not so sofisticated in her voice and it looks she love more with foreign for her language, but she seems to be a bit closer to original .

    Though nobady cold compare to E.P.

  • @Madved07 Yeah, as E.P.'s, I've been searching YT for another—even, a similar—frozen robotic stare—any soloist, anywhere—and not one do I find—one absolutely cold music teacher, for sure, . . .

  • She looks good and sounds too. But somehow it all looks excessive. She obviously bother much as her voice is trembling. It doesn't help.

    although not so bad. But boring

  • @Madved07 Sounds like you're a boring personality and irritable, . . .

  • shouldn't the people who planed this concert hear that a violin shouldn't be like an octave higher then the singers voice?

  • @russiangirl0123 Actually, the tonic spread allows greater space for the vocalist—y'need some book larnin', there, Buddy, and some rubbage with scholars, . . ."

  • @phillipgaley Now i hate being rude, but maybe you should go out and get a life instead of sitting all day and telling your pompous opinions to every single person who commented on this video. Have a nice day :D

  • Comment removed

  • Well, I would say that, you're being only about 1/2 rude, but you could have avoided it entirely and still gave the same opinion.

    "get a life", and: "your pompous opinions" are rather common and poorly put expressions which show lack of originality and lack of imagination. In each of my offerings, is presented at least one succinct reason showing cause for defense; and, your present response goes some distance to prove the rule which says that, to truth—and, especially as may be in criticism—

  • @phillipgaley do you just troll this page?

  • @roses845 I'm trying t'help ya', . . . although, I have not yet been able to find one showing those locked luster eyes, in her: "Tanya performs 'You Dont Know Me' from her new album My Turn", TT has a brief moment with her fists—I mean, not keeping time and threatening to clock the pianist, but you may like it, TT is most expressive, really connects with the song which she has chosen; I intend, of course, my op. only; I hope that, yours doesn't simply copy me—G0D Bless, . . .

  • @phillipgaley i really dont need help -_- you maystruggle to believe that people on here dont need your opinion or to have their opinion "corrected" by you xD

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • . . . . in criticism—those of poorly formed character will respond, negatively.

    But, be the reason in the criticism well placed, your proper response might have been in debate, or perhaps such as: "Why, thank you honorable sir; truly, I stand corrected; be assured, henceforth, I shall put this information to the best use possible; and should we meet again, I'll do my part that it be pleasing circumstances—I assure you that, I shall be in best form.", : ) , . . . And, if you'll look again, altho

  • @phillipgaley WHO THE ARE YOU TALKING TO?

  • . . . . again—and although could have been said—I offered comment to those only, whose negative comments appeared to have merited at least some small redress, . . . and just so you know, in spelling, to plan something in the past tense would be to have "planned" it, except that, most likely, you that and so, that was a simple typo—a mere thing upon which to have presented any criticism would have been my own breech.

    And if sincere, I do value your well wish—I'm just a poor worn out toothless old

  • . . . . toothless worn out old tom (cat); and, knowing you as I do, to be a sensitive and careful thinker, and in the same moment, looking forward to the day when I shall begin uploading, I shall be glad to entertain for possible benefit, any bit of thoughtful criticism which you may deign to present, . . .

  • @phillipgaley if you are truly that passionate on letting the world know your opinion, write a book or create a blog. Otherwise just let people leave comments without making a big fuss out of every single word written. @roses845 is right its like you trolling this page.

  • @russiangirl0123 Maybe, you're right, . . . nobody likes me, . . . I'm never going to write, ever again, . . .

  • @phillipgaley EVERYBODY CLEARLY LIKES HIM THOUGH AND THINKS HES A SERIOUS CREDIT TO THIS VIDEO ^_^ OMG BLESS HIS SOUL FOR HAUNTING THIS VIDEO <3 <3 TELLING THE NAY SAYERS WE ARE WRONG AND PROVING IT WITH HIS VAST KNOWLEDGE OF THE HUMAN MIND!! I bet he's thought about starting a cult where he's right and everyone is wrong, like that mental christian group in america that louis theroux keeps visiting :)

  • @roses845 While much more might have been pointed out—and, although I am not possessed of much knowledge—I meant to only show that, before slamming a pretty fair performer, you and some others would have better in some further thinking, . . .

    And yes, I had thought about starting a cult, except that, even upon cursory examination, I find there to be quite enough of those.

    Also, if there is a Christian group in America, . . . I'd like to know about it, . . . thank you for your interest, . . .

  • @phillipgaley thats the thing, i only said she didn't connect with the song like Edith Piaf did, the second top rated comment says basically the same thing! You really shouldn't feel the need to do this, it makes you look like a troller douche. i have no idea what the group was called because i spent too much time laughing at them, you're actually right about there being enough cults, its all the crazy charismatics who dont become sales people ;)

  • @roses845 Well, again, as beauty is in the eye, . . . the beautiful and arbitrary sensation of musical and lyrical connectedness must originate and remain with the sentience in capacity and type of the hearer. I'm careful to seldom apply the better than stereotypical opinions, simply because, as say, you were up there, singing, each is so unique.

    But to your thrust, the recordings of Edith live, she reminds me a little too much of the voice and piano music teacher type, clenching her fists in ti