Xerox versus concorrencia

[kevinwayte]

I watched this test (set it up myself at the Xerox Proving Ground in VA) so I know it's not hokey. It is TRUE. This vid is old, but those were the current competing machines at the time. Xerox makes new engines every 1-2 years. Canon and the others rehash the same engine for 4-6 years. The reason Xerox always won the race is because it multitasks. It RIPs the documents while printing. By the time it is on document 4, the whole queue is RIP'd for print, so the Xerox never pauses, job-to-job.

[PCGbrio]

Try any Canon with UFR II printing and then try again this test

[px5e9142]

In this test it is clear that rated speed does not mean good performance in real working environment. And the test was certified by Buyers Laboratory Inc. is a well respected entity in the U.S..

[kevinwayte]

But it's not just RIP-while-print that made Xerox the superior network/multitasking machine, but a lot of other little nuances that kept it printing without strange pauses between documents. Just how a Xerox double-sides with a loopback track is genius. There is always paper going through the engine at the top rated speed - side1, side2, side1, side2...fresh paper from the tray, and the loopback coming thru flipped over. Canons and Ricoh's always choked on double-sided because of clunky method.

[Solesol1971]

Xerox stop lying! Canon is much better than xerox

[px5e9142]

In this test it is clear that rated speed does not mean good performance in real working environment. And the test was certified by Buyers Laboratory Inc. is a well respected entity in the U.S..

[Drupa2010]

This is a very old video. With old HP and Canon printers against new Xerox. Not valid.

[px5e9142]

In this test it is clear that rated speed does not mean good performance in real working environment. And the test was certified by Buyers Laboratory Inc. is a well respected entity in the U.S..