Added: 2 years ago
From: pixelpro1
Views: 340,757
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (445)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • this is what i was promised in the so called next gen systems, was very disappointed, however i still cant wait till one day they put this type of physics and fluid dynamics in a game

  • @superbungabunga to get this in real time you'll need something like 1TB of video RAM on a graphics card that render about 7 trillion vertices per second or something…

  • @superdupersnorkle congratulations u just became 4th angry dumbass bitch who doesnt know how to check the current situation! please check the comments i added previously thank you and have a nice day

  • where did you learn how to do this, im just starting out in real flow and im wondering what school/website do you learn these skills because im thinking it might be a career idea?

  • @PrettyPinkPwnies so you don't understand any English and you're under 2nd grade i guess. Please read and UNDERSTAND my comment stupid fucker and have a nice day

  • @beowoulf80 bitch please check before writing on something cause i've answered similar dumb question like the one you're asking like just 5~10 lines below ur comment box. please think a little bit more before replying cause ur stupid reply is sending me gmail to check the new replies. have a nice day fucking moron.

  • @ferrarijm9 Haha what are you in fourth grade? beowoulf is right.

  • real life renders this in 12 seconds...

  • @mexi0316 As I have said before, Real Life would simulate this in real time; if twelve seconds were required to render aspects of reality, substances would appear without warning at inherently random intervals in our life.

  • @7StringSeven sorry mate but ive already corrected

    my mistake like weeks ago under some scroll so u better have checked it before bitching on me and wasting my time to check new email for ur stupid replying comment. have some milk and

    relax little boy :D

  • @7StringSeven sorry mate but ive already corrected

    my mistake like weeks ago under some scroll so u better have checked it before bitching on me and wasting my time to check new email for ur stupid replying comment. have some milk and

    relax little boy :D

  • im loving this shit

  • i cant for technology in the future that can render this real time.

  • HELL NO!

    THAT'S REAL LIQUID!

  • Badwolfshamma got fucking roasted

  • How about a billion?

  • Holy crap.

  • Oh my gosh! That looks real! Did you eat some mushrooms for a few extra lifetimes of rendering?

  • You have to make a tutorial!

    It looks so nice :D

  • @Morrwell wouldn't matter you'd need a computer you could leave to render for a week.

  • How the fuck did I end up here, coming from a Samsung commercial.....

  • SURREAL

  • I feel sorry for the 9 aquaphobics who clicked on this. Really, I do.

  • @mpkirkwood thanks a million minus 9,994,975 is actually -8,994,975 u r right ! sorry guys i saw 9,994,975 to 994,975 have a nice day :D

  • w8 what?

  • Comment removed

  • Great! topcomments are answers! now i need to find the comments -.-

  • hey i expected an actual animation

  • Thats so realistic!!!

    

  • I want that computer.

  • @badwolfshamma sorry to tell u but a million minus 9,994,975 is 5,025 not 6,135...

  • @ferrarijm9 sorry to tell you but a million minus 9,994,975 is actually -8,994,975

  • @mpkirkwood @badwolfshamma ferrarijm9

    ahahhahah dumbasses

  • @ferrarijm9 i was in a hurry and could not be arsed. but at least u where bothered to work it out... now tell me what is 5656556x6747675 and tell me what the disrance from the moon to the sun in mm.

  • @ferrarijm9 Sorry to tell you, MATE... but it's actually -8,994,975

    You might want to make sure you are correct, before correcting someone.

    The 44 people that liked that are also complete retards.

  • @ferrarijm9 Actually. a million minus 9,994,975 is not 6,135.. nor 5,025.

    it's -8,994,975.

  • @ferrarijm9 9,994,975 is more than ONE million. If you subtracted that from ONE million, it would be a negative number. Never positive. NEVER.

  • wow amazing it looks completely real, the whole time i didnt know ti was an effect

  • 9 people live in a desert

  • FUCK YOU this is real water =3

  • This is the first "non-professional" water particle rendering I've seen that isn't unrealistically slow.  Kudos.

  • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ..., 13,464.., 989,676..., 9,994975. sorry m8 ur missing 6135 particles.

  • @badwolfshamma 9,994,975 + 6,135 =/= 1,000,000

    sorry m8 ur a thousand particles over.

  • @badwolfshamma what? 9994975 + 6135 = 1001110 xD

  • @badwolfshamma uhm... hes missing 6,135 points? how? and really? 9,994,975? xD that would be like -8

  • When do you think a computer wil be able to simulate and render stuffl ike this in real time? Cuz I want that in my games, like now.

  • at some points its very realistic, but in the end, its total bullshit

  • My best commentary ever lol

  • @FunnyGuy8p Yes, intelligent and funny how long did it take to render that comment?

  • @Kommentaraccount Wie lange braucht Spontanität

  • Comment removed

  • Fake, this is real water xD

  • Fucking real-lifers. Stay out of my internets.

  • You cannot render that which is already rendered....

  • sooo...nvidia quaddro? anyone?

  • NASA called, they want their computer back.

  • Oh my God, put it on full screen and try to get the feel of it, it's almost scary to see that much water coming toward you! :D That is, until it calms down, then it looks grainy, but overall, completely well done. @ . @

  • Mother of God...

  • at the beginning I thought it was real

  • Imagine what you could achieve with 4 nVidia Tesla cards!

  • @thedevo01 Nothing, get a 12 i7 Xtreme Server Cluster!!! lol we got such in university n i can use it <3 :D

  • @FunnyGuy8p LOL niggauserious.jpg

    You've got to be kidding me! 1 Tesla S1070 has the performance of 200 i7 980x processors. 1 Tesla S1070 costs 10800 US dollars and 200 980x processors cost 245000 US dollars.

    How fucking pretentious can you be to say "Nothing" straight away?

    ProTip: Do some research next time! ;)

  • @thedevo01 just because this are graphic cards xD and realflow is getting simulated by processors

  • @FunnyGuy8p Tesla S1070 cards are processing units. Yes they are powered by CUDA GPU's but they are not something you connect to your PCI-E slot.

    And besides, you aren't obligated to using RealFlow and only RealFlow.

  • LOLOLOL 116 thumbs up

  • The graphics card is important, but it has hickups. I see like that though, so that should be perfection, 1million dpi.

  • My computer renders this in real time at 1080p.

  • That's not one million particles ... i counted 1 143 268

  • Goin out on a limb here, but I'm gunna guess this is some water being poured into a glass box.

  • Could you please tell us about your computer?? and how long it took you to render??

    I'm planing to buy a new computer....

  • REALITY ACHIEVED

  • I counted 999,999.

  • 1 million isnt much ...

  • @L4D2ownage naaaaah its just frekin imposible to a computer to run this if this was a lake in a videogame, thats all

  • @musicaddicted777 well my scene has 3 million splash particles only -__-

    well.. if it was in a video game you would be right but this is a fucking sim!

  • for a second I believe this was real water

  • Yeah, i'm pretty sure my computer would grow legs, kick me in the nuts and walk right out the front door if i tried that.

  • Lier , theres only 9999

  • @liqzy There's MUCH more than 9,999.

  • @SethiXzon Yeah, it's 999,999

  • Aliens called, they want their spaceship back

  • seriously isnt this real water :D!?

  • This water is very Scanliney

  • i swear people are born to make peoples lives difficult you can tell when they dislike obviously good videos.

  • Why dont u understand my Comment? I just said when u do this in real life then this "renders" in real time! lolol

  • that looks real ._.

  • Reallife can render this in 12 Seconds.

  • @FunnyGuy8p in 11, cause there is no 11 second

  • @FunnyGuy8p *sigh* its not a render in real life you fucking retard

  • @DaleJohnPorter cant you take a joke faggot

  • @FunnyGuy8p Actually, I'm pretty sure Real Life contains the processing power to render and simulate this in real time.

  • @SethiXzon the video is 12 sec.. he said 12 sec *realtime*

  • @RuteNL He said that it would take life twelve seconds to render such; therefore this would not be real time.

  • @RuteNL Rendering is not the act of displaying the animation. Rendering is compiling all of the particles, physics and animations into frames that will be sequentially viewed.

  • @SethiXzon If real life was a computer...you had to wait about 2 hours before swimming and starting the drink machine would take about a day :P

  • @SethiXzon the video was only 12 seconds long... faceplam

  • @mklahnTV Do you even know what the term, 'real time' generally means?

  • @SethiXzon yeah buddy!

  • @SethiXzon Real life simulates real life?

  • @SethiXzon I want"real life!" where can I download it? How much is it? I gotta have it!

  • @SuperMaster250 you already have it right?

  • @SuperMaster250 If you lost such, you'll have to wait nine months for the files to rebuild.

  • @FunnyGuy8p But it may cost 400.000 US Dollars.

  • @FunnyGuy8p Except with billions and billions more particles.

  • @DuckyRoanNubbles3D Trillions. Real life is the basis of real time.

  • @FunnyGuy8p I can render this in .000000001 second.

  • @FunnyGuy8p lol, I didn't get it at first, I was like "holy shit, what is reallife?"

  • @FunnyGuy8p Reallife can render this in 12 seconds and with a lot more of one million particles! Forget your i7 get a life!

  • Comment removed

  • @FunnyGuy8p I can't repeat the exact same scene from multiple angles in real life.

  • @FunnyGuy8p actually.. not :) we can just review the finalized video of that. PC still kicks ass

  • @FunnyGuy8p Chuck Norris can render this in 6 seconds.

  • i look forward to seeing this real-time in a decade or so .

  • @Edgebotv4

    Ya, Probably going to be possible in decade or so :)

  • I wonder what the render time is D:

  • how long did it take to rander that shit ?! XD

  • Awesome thought: in your life time, this will work on a smart-phone.

  • no thats just real water. gosh.

  • No escape from reality

  • Caught in a land slide

  • Thats very Real

  • dude u_u , this is gonna take me 6 months just to render 12 seconds

  • Im curious on how the games in 2020 will look like ..

  • you know for some movies these days they use billion+ particles...

  • render hmmm...~2 years ?

  • sweet, also the foam is a nice addition.

  • i hate that stupid nasa joke..-.-

  • IMAGINE THAT IN CRYSIS !!! :D

  • Can't wait in about 100 years that we can render that in realtime. O.o

  • @Clapboardstudio lolol in about 2 you mean

  • @mngngf So fast? :O

  • @Clapboardstudio ya, it wont be too long

  • @mngngf You are joking right?

  • HOW DO ???? TUTORIAL please

  • thats fuckingreal. is it??

  • I bet, we can render this in realtime... in about 5 to 10 years... Imagine how Computergames will look like then ;)

  • You must have an alienware computer to render this under 80 hrs-yrs

  • @domoney1011 u obvs dont know shit if ur mentioning alienware which is simply hp shit

  • @halfcraft Dell actually

  • @Rocky19011 lol i knew that just wrote wrong brand same crap

  • @domoney1011 lol retard

  • @VortexNL how? just saying need a great computer

  • @domoney1011 alienware computers are not at all powerful.

  • render time : 3 years

  • This must have taken years to render. Specs/Render time?

  • The effect right at the beginning is very impressive, later on the foam looks a little weird though. Impressive.

  • awesome man , oops

  • Didn't squidward yell "Krakatoa!" in of the episodes?

  • this likes bbetter then real water

  • So epic!

  • this looks nearly real!

  • Give us a clue as to how long it took to setup, render, simulate, and how big a file it was, etc etc etc. Type of machine you have, software, Windows version, RAM, graphics card, etc etc!!

    Thank you!

  • My computer can't even render the video.

  • nerds posting about how amazing this is...

  • @ilshockll probably you dont like it you fag so GTFO

  • @SkilledClips you mad bro?

  • fuck you this is real

  • NASA called. They want their computer back...

  • @HmmmmThatWasHawkward this was only funny at the really first time -.-

  • rendering this makes my computer crashing

  • Fuck computer programming.

    My entire life has been devoted towards solving nonlinear partial differential equations like the Navier-Stokes equations exactly. The subfield of math known as differential algebra studies such things. If you want to do something that very few are doing, study differential algebra.

    Great animation (and programming), though.

  • @DutchDude27 Ironic?

  • is this real life?

  • @marcin4645 is this just fantasy ?

  • whats funny is 1 million is SMALL. im in the middle of simulating a small scale 15million particle beach wave simulation. im shocked you got so much fine splash detail out of 1 million

  • To all the retards that think this is not CGI. Look at the water carefully, then pore a tank of water with around the same amount in to your bath tub. First thing you'll notice is that unlike this video there will not be two holes defying physics. Second, the water in your bath tub will not have white spots for so long, when the tides get smaller the white spots will leave pretty quickly. Third, this water appears to be fizzing a lot. Fourth, where the fuck would he be filming it? nomoreroom:(

  • @DutchDude27 "Chuck Norris rendered this in a Calculator."

    no, he used a potato

  • @DutchDude27 ... No, it's not. Please, the next time you have a glass of water take a good look at it. :)

  • @akanamilas You obviously don't understand the concept of sarcasm.

  • Its funny, people only care about water when its on the other side of the screen.