the history channel debunked the theorie that jet fuel cant burn steel. what they did was fill a pit with jet fuel and a steel beam hanged over the pit. they then set the fuel on fire and the steel melted. however they added the amount of jet fuel the plane had when it set of but planes burn jet fuel when theyre flying, therefore the history channel added to much fuel. also when jet fuel explodes in tanks, it vapourises and about 20 percent is left. the history channel didnt explode the jet fuel
of the alleged terrorists' bags, that supposedly didn't make it onto the hijacked flight, contained the man's will. There is no logical reason why someone would bring a will onto a plane that they intended to hijack and crash, so at this point, the prudent thing to do would be to consider the possibility of planted evidence. Regardless of your stance on 9/11, everyone should be able to agree that the history channel has omitted alot of key evidence, and produced a very biased film, overall.
No Coincidence Theorist has ever produce adequate evidence to support the official story of events for 9/11. the C.I.A translation of the bin laden confession video has been proven to be flawed by a team of German translators, who state the the film contains only footage of individuals expressing approval of the events of 9/11, but at no point is a confession discernible. There are other serious problems with some of the government's 'proof' that they've presented us with. For example, in one
When are people going to get it through their thick skull? The 9/11 commission report is not the official report. They didn't explain the collpases or crash sites in detail because none of the board members were experts in the proper fields.
Are you a 9-11 truther or not? Cuz the evidence is more over whelming that the "official" story of 9-11 is the real story that happened. The Alex Jones and other people have no facts about what happened.
It must be *very* nice to be able to lie to your self so successfully to the point of pure ignorance and false purity. The gloriously innocent perception of humanity and the world you must have. Oh god, how I wish I could just tell myself to ignore reality...
What am I getting at with such thick sarcasm? Ignorance is bliss, but to choose ignorance, is idiocy. Enjoy.
While I question the official story of 9-11 I have to admit that many of the conspiracy theories also do not hold water. How do you rationalise your disbelief of the official 9-11 with the recent announcement that those held at Gitmo want to confess to 9-11? I am not denigrating you. I am simply looking for an intelligent response.
I must admit i haven't really been keeping up with current events so I haven't really looked much into it, but according to Sky News - "With time running out on the administration of U.S. President George Bush, and with his successor, President-elect Barack Obama, saying he wants to close the Cuban detention facility, analysts said Mohammed and the others may see guilty pleas for the Sept. 11 attacks as the only way they can draw death sentences and die as martyrs".
So that seems like a plausable explanation, but only if one is needed. My argument is not that the US carried out the attack, it's that they knew about the attack and allowed it to happen. Bin Laden also confessed (although this is debated), but it doesn't mean al queda carried out the attack alone without america actively letting it take place..
now i'm french!! brilliant. takes one click on my profile to find out my nationality and 2 people get it wrong. shows your research ability though..
anyway yeah u got me. me n osama.. we're like.. best buds. i disagree with popular mechanics and the history channel so we're obviously like family. Cos osama wants us to believe he didn't do it didnt he!! what with that confession and everything. again, get an education you thick twat.
Nice job! Good job of editing even though the content and the conspiracy theories are illogical BS. I'm amazed at how the same people can think the Bush is a total idiot while at the same time think he is the leader of a cabal that pulls off the most elaborate and successful conspiracy in history while keeping the hundreds and hundreds of co-conspirators required to pull it off to maintain complete secrecy.
How many people do they need? They ordered a stand down on assassinating bin laden and how many people do you think that would take? You think you need some kind of underground network of evil minions to pave the way a bit for these terrorists? How many people need to know when to conveniently paralyse NORAD so these attacks would be effective? They don't need an army of men, it's called 'compartmentalisation'.
kvineyard, Bush is either an oscar-worthy actor or the Mr. Thicky-thick the thick guy from the shallow end of the gene pool. No-one said he is the leader of the cabal, merely the figurehead. Let's face it, most people are convinced that his wife has to dress him in the morning, what are the chances he makes ANY decisions? Not many conspirators needed at all and they are all probably dead or in hiding/detention now.
I watched the whole thing yesterday and all it did was lie. 50% of it contradicted the "official" report. 25% of it wasn't by experts.10% was no this is how it happened which also contradicts the official report. Then the rest was attacked on Emotions. Then when it came to the New American Century stuff it completly blocked out stuff like "New World Order" and just show "World Order". At least the JFK one went into detail all this would do is go "your crazy!!"
Hi, liking the documentary, i hate the fact that anyone who questions the 9/11 official story is automatically branded, "wacko" or "conspiracy nut" and so on, and so on. Anyway, what is the name of the song at the start please? Thanks :)
Anyone who presents a rational scientific question deserves respect. The other side of that coin is you must accept scientific evidence.
Claims such as "a laser designator helped remotely piloted planes strike the towers... here is a video of the laser spot" ignore basic physics. When you explain WHY such a "theory" is impossible, you are called a shill.
That is intellectually dishonest. Show me an intellectually honest truther, and we can have a discussion.
"Stereotypes of a conspiracy theorist". Every CT I meet uses the same tactics of attacking anyone who disagrees with them. Also, History Channel is the most credible source of information period. They are highly respected and have been for some time. This guy even had to break down the ownerships of the history channel several times to find companies that "may" want to block the truth. Pathetic.
They may be a credible source of information, but they only address what they want to. And the affiliations are important because these corporations are symbiotic - there is no way the History Channel could broadcast a balanced, unbiased documentary.
If you looked hard enough you could find corporations that own every information channel that could prevent them from running a fair production. Even so, you had to break down the list to sub-owners of one of the history's channel main owners. It sounds like you are desperately trying to discredit them. Also, even if they only talked about what they wanted to talk about it doesn't mean they were lying.
I appreciate that actually. But the fact that it is widespread doesn't necessarily mean it isn't important. Big corporations diversify hugely and regardless of the scale of this ownership i still feel it is important. For instance, are the History Channel going to ever discuss GE's war profiteering? No.
And i accept they are not always lying. In most cases not, in fact. But there are cases where they are and i address these. My main point is about ommissions, not disinformaion.
No disrespect, but everything is owned by a corporation so the whole they wouldn't want an accurate story is a little weak. Besides, they are the HISTORY channel. They don't care about current political events. Others have reported that anyways like FOX news. Here's what weak about your video. You seem to be misinterpreting the History Channel's intention. Conspiracists and skeptics are two different thing. Every sign and person shown ARE the traits of conspiracists.
the history channel debunked the theorie that jet fuel cant burn steel. what they did was fill a pit with jet fuel and a steel beam hanged over the pit. they then set the fuel on fire and the steel melted. however they added the amount of jet fuel the plane had when it set of but planes burn jet fuel when theyre flying, therefore the history channel added to much fuel. also when jet fuel explodes in tanks, it vapourises and about 20 percent is left. the history channel didnt explode the jet fuel
TheReggieMac 2 years ago
The emperor has no clothes
smallfish1960 2 years ago
Damn conspiracy theorists can't accept the truth
natefacehahn 2 years ago
Comment removed
natefacehahn 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
History Channel = Fox
Fox = Republican Party
Thus documentary that to discredit 911 investigator
With answers experts :
" it's absurd " or
" not decent to doubt the honesty of the agents of the secret service "
ACABDaniel 2 years ago
of the alleged terrorists' bags, that supposedly didn't make it onto the hijacked flight, contained the man's will. There is no logical reason why someone would bring a will onto a plane that they intended to hijack and crash, so at this point, the prudent thing to do would be to consider the possibility of planted evidence. Regardless of your stance on 9/11, everyone should be able to agree that the history channel has omitted alot of key evidence, and produced a very biased film, overall.
paleopeneyes 2 years ago 2
No Coincidence Theorist has ever produce adequate evidence to support the official story of events for 9/11. the C.I.A translation of the bin laden confession video has been proven to be flawed by a team of German translators, who state the the film contains only footage of individuals expressing approval of the events of 9/11, but at no point is a confession discernible. There are other serious problems with some of the government's 'proof' that they've presented us with. For example, in one
paleopeneyes 2 years ago
we all need to learn the language bin laden speaks, so that we can listen to what he says, without the help of corrupt government translators.
TheReggieMac 2 years ago
When are people going to get it through their thick skull? The 9/11 commission report is not the official report. They didn't explain the collpases or crash sites in detail because none of the board members were experts in the proper fields.
AmericasFan 3 years ago
Are you a 9-11 truther or not? Cuz the evidence is more over whelming that the "official" story of 9-11 is the real story that happened. The Alex Jones and other people have no facts about what happened.
slatchem2016 2 years ago
I'm a debunker baby. I've been able to convince quite a few people on this site that it wasn't an inside job. There's just no evidence for it.
AmericasFan 2 years ago
It must be *very* nice to be able to lie to your self so successfully to the point of pure ignorance and false purity. The gloriously innocent perception of humanity and the world you must have. Oh god, how I wish I could just tell myself to ignore reality...
What am I getting at with such thick sarcasm? Ignorance is bliss, but to choose ignorance, is idiocy. Enjoy.
GooGobbler113 2 years ago
While I question the official story of 9-11 I have to admit that many of the conspiracy theories also do not hold water. How do you rationalise your disbelief of the official 9-11 with the recent announcement that those held at Gitmo want to confess to 9-11? I am not denigrating you. I am simply looking for an intelligent response.
JohnPurvis 3 years ago
I must admit i haven't really been keeping up with current events so I haven't really looked much into it, but according to Sky News - "With time running out on the administration of U.S. President George Bush, and with his successor, President-elect Barack Obama, saying he wants to close the Cuban detention facility, analysts said Mohammed and the others may see guilty pleas for the Sept. 11 attacks as the only way they can draw death sentences and die as martyrs".
Comment to continue...
Jonny35jj 3 years ago
So that seems like a plausable explanation, but only if one is needed. My argument is not that the US carried out the attack, it's that they knew about the attack and allowed it to happen. Bin Laden also confessed (although this is debated), but it doesn't mean al queda carried out the attack alone without america actively letting it take place..
Jonny35jj 3 years ago
ever hear of the spanish inquisition ? same concept
killer0341 2 years ago
No actual debunking here, only a critique of media ownership and their portrayals of twoofers. *sigh* checking part two...
cryptsub 3 years ago
twoofers? how old are u...
bu yeah cheers for reiterating the description (falls under the 'manipulation' category.
Jonny35jj 3 years ago
u french pice of shit. Terrorists in other countries must think u like family to them
skiingnuts 3 years ago
now i'm french!! brilliant. takes one click on my profile to find out my nationality and 2 people get it wrong. shows your research ability though..
anyway yeah u got me. me n osama.. we're like.. best buds. i disagree with popular mechanics and the history channel so we're obviously like family. Cos osama wants us to believe he didn't do it didnt he!! what with that confession and everything. again, get an education you thick twat.
Jonny35jj 3 years ago
Who made this video must be a piece of shit.American dickhead
Vojto111 3 years ago
I made it. I'm British. Nice try. :D
Jonny35jj 3 years ago
even worse. An America hater.
skiingnuts 3 years ago
lol i love the way ur insults are so interchangable. genious...
Jonny35jj 3 years ago
Nice job! Good job of editing even though the content and the conspiracy theories are illogical BS. I'm amazed at how the same people can think the Bush is a total idiot while at the same time think he is the leader of a cabal that pulls off the most elaborate and successful conspiracy in history while keeping the hundreds and hundreds of co-conspirators required to pull it off to maintain complete secrecy.
kvineyard 3 years ago
How many people do they need? They ordered a stand down on assassinating bin laden and how many people do you think that would take? You think you need some kind of underground network of evil minions to pave the way a bit for these terrorists? How many people need to know when to conveniently paralyse NORAD so these attacks would be effective? They don't need an army of men, it's called 'compartmentalisation'.
Jonny35jj 3 years ago
Bill Clinton ordered the stand down on the assassination of Bill Clinton...
tkepe230 3 years ago 2
kvineyard, Bush is either an oscar-worthy actor or the Mr. Thicky-thick the thick guy from the shallow end of the gene pool. No-one said he is the leader of the cabal, merely the figurehead. Let's face it, most people are convinced that his wife has to dress him in the morning, what are the chances he makes ANY decisions? Not many conspirators needed at all and they are all probably dead or in hiding/detention now.
alisooter 3 years ago
Thank you for this.
hunkamonkiman 3 years ago
I watched the whole thing yesterday and all it did was lie. 50% of it contradicted the "official" report. 25% of it wasn't by experts.10% was no this is how it happened which also contradicts the official report. Then the rest was attacked on Emotions. Then when it came to the New American Century stuff it completly blocked out stuff like "New World Order" and just show "World Order". At least the JFK one went into detail all this would do is go "your crazy!!"
dandaman2206 3 years ago
Hi, liking the documentary, i hate the fact that anyone who questions the 9/11 official story is automatically branded, "wacko" or "conspiracy nut" and so on, and so on. Anyway, what is the name of the song at the start please? Thanks :)
conr16 3 years ago
Hey, I'm glad you liked it. The song's called 'God Moving Over The Face Of Waters' by Moby.
Jonny35jj 3 years ago
Anyone who presents a rational scientific question deserves respect. The other side of that coin is you must accept scientific evidence.
Claims such as "a laser designator helped remotely piloted planes strike the towers... here is a video of the laser spot" ignore basic physics. When you explain WHY such a "theory" is impossible, you are called a shill.
That is intellectually dishonest. Show me an intellectually honest truther, and we can have a discussion.
conotoxin 3 years ago 2
Who claimed that? No one? We call this a 'strawman argument'. If you still want that discussion get back to me.
Jonny35jj 3 years ago
Thanks for the video! Very intriguing of the History channel to do such a program.
ZotDudot7 3 years ago
"Stereotypes of a conspiracy theorist". Every CT I meet uses the same tactics of attacking anyone who disagrees with them. Also, History Channel is the most credible source of information period. They are highly respected and have been for some time. This guy even had to break down the ownerships of the history channel several times to find companies that "may" want to block the truth. Pathetic.
gamingeagle19 3 years ago
They may be a credible source of information, but they only address what they want to. And the affiliations are important because these corporations are symbiotic - there is no way the History Channel could broadcast a balanced, unbiased documentary.
Jonny35jj 3 years ago
If you looked hard enough you could find corporations that own every information channel that could prevent them from running a fair production. Even so, you had to break down the list to sub-owners of one of the history's channel main owners. It sounds like you are desperately trying to discredit them. Also, even if they only talked about what they wanted to talk about it doesn't mean they were lying.
gamingeagle19 3 years ago
I appreciate that actually. But the fact that it is widespread doesn't necessarily mean it isn't important. Big corporations diversify hugely and regardless of the scale of this ownership i still feel it is important. For instance, are the History Channel going to ever discuss GE's war profiteering? No.
And i accept they are not always lying. In most cases not, in fact. But there are cases where they are and i address these. My main point is about ommissions, not disinformaion.
Jonny35jj 3 years ago
No disrespect, but everything is owned by a corporation so the whole they wouldn't want an accurate story is a little weak. Besides, they are the HISTORY channel. They don't care about current political events. Others have reported that anyways like FOX news. Here's what weak about your video. You seem to be misinterpreting the History Channel's intention. Conspiracists and skeptics are two different thing. Every sign and person shown ARE the traits of conspiracists.
gamingeagle19 3 years ago
OK, we KNOW Bush is a fuck'n Imbecile, but geez I hate that he is making ALL American's look just as dumb....that pisses me off.
Like really how dumb does he want his country to look? As of now, he pretty much can't make look any dumber.
StraightUpBitch 3 years ago 2