Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (77)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • This is my favorite campaign. You get to change the course of history so that the good guys actually win.

  • they cant eat pork because in hinduism at that time they were all vegetarians and for muslims pork was HARAM meaning that in islam pork cant be eaten.

  • India became free from Britain in 1947

  • @gooners105 the same year in which pakistan was born for the muslims of india

  • they could have based the story of the indian campaign on the pashtun troops who fought british to control the modern day province of khyber pashtun khawh in modern day country of pakistan the pashtuns were dissbanded from the british army after they caused a hell lot of losses to the british army

  • can some one upload a battle between 2 good players going at it just like in star craft 2 and please if you are a noob we don't want to see you play.

    if any of you who is not a noob is intrested in uploading a good battle send me a massage so i can watch it i love AOE 3 and i am sure many of you do peace

  • really why the hell does the british terrorize everyone france america scottland wales india dont they ever stop?

  • is the best

  • achei muuito bom bom bone!!!! yes yes good....

  • Comment removed

  • is this real history?

  • @Aydee2020 No, but it's based on a real rebellion.

  • so what is the real event?

  • @Aydee2020 Depending on who you ask, it can either be called the:

    Sepoy Mutiny

    First War of Indian Independence

    Second War of Indian Independence

    Sepoy Revolt

  • i hate how they say leftieuniet screw i cant spell

  • That's the British way of saying it, it's spelt the same, but said differently!

  • Why didn't Nahib save everyone a whole lot of trouble and just shoot the Colonel instead of just one of his nameless knights? -_-'

  • @GameSheriff I thought the same :=)

  • @GameSheriff Great leaders do not kill the enemy general at once. They bring them down first and then kill them.

  • hmm quite epic

  • hmm... good...! =)

  • Damn interesting story

  • i don't understand why u don't have to fight but i think AoE3-TAD rocks i love it!!!!

  • De todas las campañas de AOE esta es por lejos mi favorita!!!

  • I like it when u hav to rescue the Shah from the british

  • @meshtornProductions I accidentally gave you a thumbs down for that statement, but it was meant to be a thumbs up.

  • why dont u have to fight

  • @robbe700 Uh.... you do. These are cutscenes.

  • Prophecy that the British India will fell in "one century" (1947). In fact it did.

  • actually 1847 is the 19th century but nvr mind ty for uploading

  • lol, it was funny how Nanib strutted a 9:08

  • he was the only british officer alive the rest got killed by russian assasins

    the russians always help the indians ha what do you know im going to india on december 4th

  • Thank god, atleats theres one other person in the company who feels the same i do about the british mistreating the indians. Man, Nanib should have shot that bastard ages ago...

    Go India!

  • was the colonel the only british officer in india during 1857?

  • man my computer will die if i play this game

  • There's several levels of detail available in the options. While not pretty, the lower details can smooth frame rates out a lot.

  • IS THAT THE VOICE OF HADJI?!

  • thats right nanib show those indians how to fire that rifle lol

  • I'm guessing he didn't plan on those Indians getting killed when he told them to leave.

  • No, Nanib did not mean for that to happen.

  • how about mixing zerg?

  • Very nice dictator,keep up the good work

  • nice video dude, keep on

  • it wasnt muslims who fought it was mostly sikhs who fought british this game is bull shit but good video dictator

  • ya know just cause they got one or couple of units wrong dosent mean the games bad

  • The sikhs are the only ones that sided with the brits. You can see that legacy even today.

  • sided?? do u mean join forces that was only after we lost the hindus barely contributed to anything nothing with the moguls, british and independence it was sikhs who fought physically and diplomaticly for freedom and peace

  • do u mean join forces that was only after we lost--yah whatever asshole !! all the rebels were hindus. fightling for the shikh misls is one thing fighting for the white man is another.

    LOL your esteemed golden temple elders even made that fucker Dyer an honorary sikh. Get off your high horse and smell reality.

  • whats with the anger??? how can a religeon lose a fight they never even fought?? the hindus didnt offer as many fighter or barely any to fight off the british it was only after the sikh where over run we joined there colonyial armys but today sikhs are in the indian army the reason it might seem we sikhs joined the british is just the coming of a

  • there aint no anger just reality. there is nothing glorious about being from a cannon fodder community. tell me smartass-what did your people gain dying in afghanistan fighting for the brits, in north africa, italy.

  • new age and less tension(even though they treated us wrongly) but that wasnt all the british the commander of the east india company even weared a turban and fired all sikhs who dare shave or cut there hair

  • even though they treated us wrongly--> LOL crybaby we are all treated like shit by the incompetents in power. Tell me one group in India that has it good consistently.

    weared a turban and fired all sikhs who dare shave or cut there hair--> my people were asked to chew on pig fat temples were desecrated, Whats new??

  • "hindus barely contributed to anything nothing with the moguls" -- very costly coming from someones whos ancestors promised brotherhood and then fled like chicken shit when the largest muslim army came calling(panipat III). ever heard of the marathas, We bore the brunt of mughal attacks and your people only stepped in once there was a void in the fighting. though I admire the 10 gurus and their sacrifices the rest werent any different from the traitors of India.

  • irony u said how we fled from u but look at the third battle of panipat the suraj mal and rajputs fled right before the battle and even though hindus sacrificed 70,000 or more at that big battle but it comes to show that hindus when they flee 10,000 lives + are gone even today hindus are acting cowardly look at gandhi he praised sikhs for over 70% of deaths from protest and battles against the british for independce he promised many things but today those things where violated which is reallysad

  • sikhs saved the hindu relgeon when the moghuls where massacering all the hindus/sikhs we sacrificed our gurus for peace and free dom

  • I consider sikhs as my own people I just dont like hippocrates like you that think they are better than the rest of us. Scratch beneath the martial race theory and see what you find there-nothing but servitude!! We all have stories of sacrifice just that some are more glorified than others.

  • I never said sikhs are above man or hindus i was proving a point and when i say hindus i dont mean the whole religeon.

  • And from which community came all the original teaching. Sikhs are and will remain a bigpart of indian fighting prowness just that they arent alone. ever head of the thambis, ahoms, wodeyars and gurkhas!! these heroic people are not given the respect they deserve because some others are excessivly glorifies.

  • Ive been to India and i don't hate India. Also the golden temple does not spread lies and hatred about Hindus.

  • I never said otherwise just dont like the pompous farts in the golden temple and the worthless expatriates that have turned their back on the motherland and think they know anything about their indian comrades. There are sikhs in top position all over india Can you still say you were treated badly. Blame the Congress thugs not India for those shameful riots the common Indian man considers the sikhs as their own. Its you lot that want India hurt.

  • LOL the sikhs never turned up at all even after allying with us marathas. The rajputs were always sell outs(never did their job in the first place) leaving an army with more civilians than soldiers and a superior enemy(largest afghan army till date) But Karma is a bitch aint it--soon after cam the sacking and deseration of the golden temple. If you boys were at panipat none of this would have happened.

  • Well if the Sikh Empire was established earlier we might have fought but we where not united at that time until 1799+

  • @eviltwin777 neither sikh nor muslim nor hindus fought more against the british

    All of them fought equally , so dont say bullshit like that around any where if you dont know anything

  • sikh were against the muslims and hindus from the start durring the british attack on india when the hindus back stabbed the muslims and blamed the uprising on the muslims shows what you know about history dumbass

  • @eviltwin777 though i understand what u mean they only said muslims were part of it but both muslim,hindus were part of the mutiny

  • @eviltwin777 No no no, i think it was more hindus than sikhs

  • @eviltwin777 fuck you this game is great even the story

  • @eviltwin777 Your bull shit

  • @eviltwin777 im sorry sir but u r wrong on that.You can read any history book and the mughals who were muslims ruled india.they were the major force against the british.Yes the muslims were a minority ruling over the mass of non muslims including sikhs and hindus just like the british.Many of the soldiers in the mughal army were hindus and sikhs.

  • @amemirza Lol your from Pakistan so i expect you not to know better. They called the Emperor of the "Mughal Empire" the King of Delhi since he lost all his power. The Marathi, Mysore, Sikh Empires/Kingdoms where the dominate opposition against East India Company and the Crown throughout there history. Lmao The Mughal Emperor accepted protection from the British let alone fight against them.

  • @eviltwin777 The Mughal emperor was brought out of exile to act as a figurehead in the rebellion, that's why the Sikhs weren't willing to join the rebellion.

  • @eviltwin777 Muslims and Hindus did join the rebellion after the enfield rifle scandal, but when they joined the rebellion, religous diffrences divided their movement

  • @eviltwin777 The Sikhs actually supported the British in the Indian revolution. They thought the Muslim Indians as responsible for the British victory over the Sikhs, and didn't trust them.

  • nice stuff i love the way you do this stuff.

  • i didnt make these i just record them and post em

  • lol well thnx for posting it.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more