Oh no!! - we are burning the remains of that poor people and animals that died in noahs flood to create a new flood by global warming!
Hmm - but that must have been a lot of critters. Lets see, global animal biomass is estimated at 600 million tons, 200 tons ideally make 600 barrels of oil, that is 1.8 billion barrels of oil, at the current rate of consumption of 85 million barrels daily that would last an astonishing 21 days... duh!
Your ignorance is dazzling, sport. So... you think everything has always been as it is now, and only 10% of the Earth's land surface has ever supported lush vegetation and animal life? Wow. Get a clue.
The numbers I gave are total Earth animal biomass, including the oceans (which is a bonus, as obviously fish would not die in a flood). You cannot count vegetation for oil production as vegetation is transformed to coal by burial. If you do count vegetation, you need to find a new explanation for coal formation.
Even if your claim that I missed 90% of the biomass (why?), this would just increase the amount 10-fold, leading to 210 days - still not even a year!
@xESOTERlC yeah I know that. But that would have required too much "belief" in science which tells us about where oil came from - something obviously not so favoured by the people inventing this theory. So I stuck to rather common and easy to understand data and numbers that do not take a geochemist to understand
Re: "You cannot count vegetation for oil production as vegetation is transformed to coal by burial. If you do count vegetation, you need to find a new explanation for coal formation."
Dead wrong, sport. Coal is formed from floating mats of logs. Vegetation also makes oil under global flood conditions. So oil comes from both animal and vegetable materials.
"Even if your claim that I missed 90% of the biomass (why?), this would just increase the amount 10-fold"
Your 50,000 year figure is overly optimistic, to anyone who has learned to think rather than believing the NWO brainwash. Taking into account the earth's deteriorating magnetic field and the fact that C14 has not yet reached equilibrium (it is still increasing, and takes about 10,000 years to reach equilibrium), the margin for error in radiocarbon dating is about 1000%. The old civilizations have been wrongly dated due to the false assumption that they were consecutive rather than concurrent.
If you post obscene, false, defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing or irrelevant comments, your comments will be deleted. If you persist, you will be blocked. Do you have anything intelligent or of a specific scientific nature to contribute?
You should also read pages 1, 3, and 5. You're making what is called a "straw man argument". Go and check out the EVIDENCE, and formulate an alternative explanation if you can.
Thank you for posting this and allowing comments too! Some of us sheep have taken a while to ask for the "Truth" some of us aren't ready yet To those that are only interested in fugly personal disinformation that is business as usual = Go back to sleep. Imagine a world without USA dependence on foreign oil. Like any junkie getting clean is painful, one day at a time, & the junk dealers will suffer the most.xox
So, 4400 plus 2008 is 6408. No C-14, just simple math. I guess the real question is how long before the first Ice Age was the earth in existence. Or how long was God's first day? The second? Perhaps the proper mix IS mythology and science. Like a ring full of keys to a perceived single lock. Thanks for the lessons.
The Creation was around 4000 B.C. Gravitational time dilation accounts for the problem of star light having adequate time to reach the earth after God stretched out the heavens. From the perspective of an observer on earth, the Creation took 6 literal days, but from the perspective of an observer far out in the Universe, much MORE time passed. The granite crust of the earth was created SOLID in less than 3 minutes.(Polonium 214)Most "science" today IS mythology. The Bible had it right all along.
"Little children, it is the last time: and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even now are there many antichrists; whereby we know that it is the last time."
When Christians speak of THE antichrist (singular) it is understood to be a reference to the King of the North, the man of sin and son of perdition whose history is traced back beyond the Garden of Eden to the Fifth Cherub... the one who fell to become Satan, the "dark lord".
3/4 of the earth's surface was land area, with most of it being a tropical rainforest, and temperate climes in the polar regions. Yes it is possible, and yes it happened. Check pages 4 and 5 on the s8int site for the physical evidence.
First of all, Carbon 14 dating isn't reliable for materials older than about 4000 years for several reasons. One is that the earth's magnetic field was much stronger before the Flood and is rapidly deteriorating even now. Another is that C-14 has not yet reached equilibrium. The earth's magnetic field affects the rate of C-14 formation, & the dating system is based on false assumptions that skew the results toward "older" dates. The Flood was about 4370 years ago, or about 2370 B.C.
Oh no!! - we are burning the remains of that poor people and animals that died in noahs flood to create a new flood by global warming!
Hmm - but that must have been a lot of critters. Lets see, global animal biomass is estimated at 600 million tons, 200 tons ideally make 600 barrels of oil, that is 1.8 billion barrels of oil, at the current rate of consumption of 85 million barrels daily that would last an astonishing 21 days... duh!
auroraglacialis 1 year ago
@auroraglacialis
Your ignorance is dazzling, sport. So... you think everything has always been as it is now, and only 10% of the Earth's land surface has ever supported lush vegetation and animal life? Wow. Get a clue.
mrmacmasonry 1 year ago
@mrmacmasonry
The numbers I gave are total Earth animal biomass, including the oceans (which is a bonus, as obviously fish would not die in a flood). You cannot count vegetation for oil production as vegetation is transformed to coal by burial. If you do count vegetation, you need to find a new explanation for coal formation.
Even if your claim that I missed 90% of the biomass (why?), this would just increase the amount 10-fold, leading to 210 days - still not even a year!
auroraglacialis 1 year ago
@auroraglacialis Oil came from sea life, including its vegetation. Coal is from land vegetation.
Other than that
:)
xESOTERlC 11 months ago
@xESOTERlC yeah I know that. But that would have required too much "belief" in science which tells us about where oil came from - something obviously not so favoured by the people inventing this theory. So I stuck to rather common and easy to understand data and numbers that do not take a geochemist to understand
auroraglacialis 9 months ago
@auroraglacialis
Re: "You cannot count vegetation for oil production as vegetation is transformed to coal by burial. If you do count vegetation, you need to find a new explanation for coal formation."
Dead wrong, sport. Coal is formed from floating mats of logs. Vegetation also makes oil under global flood conditions. So oil comes from both animal and vegetable materials.
"Even if your claim that I missed 90% of the biomass (why?), this would just increase the amount 10-fold"
Wrong again.
mrmacmasonry 1 year ago
theageofbasemetalDOTblogspotDOTcom
That should open some eyes.
mrmacmasonry 3 years ago
Your 50,000 year figure is overly optimistic, to anyone who has learned to think rather than believing the NWO brainwash. Taking into account the earth's deteriorating magnetic field and the fact that C14 has not yet reached equilibrium (it is still increasing, and takes about 10,000 years to reach equilibrium), the margin for error in radiocarbon dating is about 1000%. The old civilizations have been wrongly dated due to the false assumption that they were consecutive rather than concurrent.
mrmacmasonry 3 years ago
If you post obscene, false, defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing or irrelevant comments, your comments will be deleted. If you persist, you will be blocked. Do you have anything intelligent or of a specific scientific nature to contribute?
You're on thin ice, bud.
mrmacmasonry 3 years ago
this is they first creationist channel that does not ban comments to videos. for that you must be commended.
as for kent hovind everyone knows he just talks crap to make money off the ignorant and gullible.
Decebal825 3 years ago 2
Go to s8intDOTcomSLASHboneyard4DOThtml
You should also read pages 1, 3, and 5. You're making what is called a "straw man argument". Go and check out the EVIDENCE, and formulate an alternative explanation if you can.
mrmacmasonry 3 years ago
Thank you for posting this and allowing comments too! Some of us sheep have taken a while to ask for the "Truth" some of us aren't ready yet To those that are only interested in fugly personal disinformation that is business as usual = Go back to sleep. Imagine a world without USA dependence on foreign oil. Like any junkie getting clean is painful, one day at a time, & the junk dealers will suffer the most.xox
mcc11505 3 years ago
So, 4400 plus 2008 is 6408. No C-14, just simple math. I guess the real question is how long before the first Ice Age was the earth in existence. Or how long was God's first day? The second? Perhaps the proper mix IS mythology and science. Like a ring full of keys to a perceived single lock. Thanks for the lessons.
rcousinrudy 3 years ago
The Creation was around 4000 B.C. Gravitational time dilation accounts for the problem of star light having adequate time to reach the earth after God stretched out the heavens. From the perspective of an observer on earth, the Creation took 6 literal days, but from the perspective of an observer far out in the Universe, much MORE time passed. The granite crust of the earth was created SOLID in less than 3 minutes.(Polonium 214)Most "science" today IS mythology. The Bible had it right all along.
mrmacmasonry 3 years ago
Well than woe to we, us generation of serpents with judgment now unfolding. So who is the anti-Christ? I'm not joking.
rcousinrudy 3 years ago
"Little children, it is the last time: and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even now are there many antichrists; whereby we know that it is the last time."
When Christians speak of THE antichrist (singular) it is understood to be a reference to the King of the North, the man of sin and son of perdition whose history is traced back beyond the Garden of Eden to the Fifth Cherub... the one who fell to become Satan, the "dark lord".
mrmacmasonry 3 years ago
Got it.
rcousinrudy 3 years ago
There could not have been enough people and animals to product millions of gallons of oil under the earth in just one event like the flood.
Nor is it possible with evolution. Populations were too small.
Think about it.
Entropy56 4 years ago
3/4 of the earth's surface was land area, with most of it being a tropical rainforest, and temperate climes in the polar regions. Yes it is possible, and yes it happened. Check pages 4 and 5 on the s8int site for the physical evidence.
mrmacmasonry 4 years ago
but the earth is well over 6,000 yours old.
Civilization dates back to 9500 BC.
Go on Wikipedia and look up "civilization"
rcousinrudy 4 years ago
First of all, Carbon 14 dating isn't reliable for materials older than about 4000 years for several reasons. One is that the earth's magnetic field was much stronger before the Flood and is rapidly deteriorating even now. Another is that C-14 has not yet reached equilibrium. The earth's magnetic field affects the rate of C-14 formation, & the dating system is based on false assumptions that skew the results toward "older" dates. The Flood was about 4370 years ago, or about 2370 B.C.
mrmacmasonry 3 years ago