@MaoistRebelNews2 This video is complete bullshit, showing your true colors, I bet you are proud that Communism "Materialist Philosophy" has been responsible for over 120 million deaths in the 20th Century, you discredited yourself when you opened your mouth!
This video is stupid. Go shit yourself. You blocked ratings because you know everyone would DISLIKE your crappy excuse for a video. Stop wasting our time you misinformed, ignorant, uneducated troll.
When did it become racist to criticize violent blacks or criticize the system of dependency and victim-hood and double racial standards.You say 33 years(wrong) worth of letters but 3 article out of thousands.the offending ones were during the wave of drug and gang violence that was sweeping the nation. Blacks have been given every luxury to succeed except one -The War on Drugs. A white man critical of blacks and what they do. Come on.
Mao was the biggest racist of them + mil. of dead Chinese.
When did it become racist to criticize violent blacks or criticize the system of dependency and victim-hood and double racial standards.You say 33 years(wrong) worth of letters but 3 article out of thousands.the offending ones were during the wave of drug and gang violence that was sweeping the nation. Blacks have been given every luxury to succeed except one -The War on Drugs. A white man critical of blacks and what they do. Come on.
Mao was the biggest racist of them + mil. of dead Chinese.
When did it become racist to criticize violent blacks or criticize the system of dependency and victim-hood and double racial standards.You say 33 years(wrong) worth of letters but 3 article out of thousands.the offending ones were during the wave of drug and gang violence that was sweeping the nation. Blacks have been given every luxury to succeed except one -The War on Drugs. A white man critical of blacks and what they do. Come on.
Mao was the biggest racist of them + mil. of dead Chinese.
When did it become racist to criticize violent blacks or criticize the system of dependency and victim-hood and double racial standards.You say 33 years(wrong) worth of letters but 3 article out of thousands.the offending ones were during the wave of drug and gang violence that was sweeping the nation. Blacks have been given every luxury to succeed except one -The War on Drugs. A white man critical of blacks and what they do. Come on.
Mao was the biggest racist of them + mil. of dead Chinese.
If you go back farther in the 1990's he didn't deny anything. There's video of him in the late 90's talking about it. And at least once in the past Congress had some type of resolution or whatever you call it praising the passage of the Civil Rights Act and Ron Paul was the only person to vote against it. He's been on Alex Jones's show plenty of times. I'm sure you can find all sorts of shit from that.
The thing I find amusing about all this shit is this crap has happened in these newsletters for 33 damn yrs. So Paultards expect others to believe that for 33 yrs he never once knew these words were being written and spread out to his subscribers. That no one ever got held accountable for these words. Why hasn't he said "oh so and so was fired over that" but since I first found out about these papers back in 2004 I never have seen who was held accountable. Paultards: not everyone is a moron.
@KarateMastR57 Pfft he's not Anti-war. He's anti fed govt. If the fed govt is involved he's against it. He's also someone who is for isolation. But he has taken money from well known white racists and associates with them.
Needling was the true it happened in New York in 1989. It was the thing to do jab white women with needles. Macy's store N.Y. in the fall on 1989. Many blacks hate whites and many whites hate blacks. The newsletters were blog of the day. Does Ariana Huffington know everything on hers? If you love Mao that racist pedophile why are you not in China. Oh yeah the Chinese took down the mass murderers statues expect Tienanmen sq. where thousands died. Pretty fat for a commie. They hate him.
@aBRUSHforCONFUCIUS Riiight but I'm sure Arianna would at least take responsibility when she first heard about it and fired the person who wrote the horrible filth but no Ron Paul let this person (snark) write their filth for 33 DAMN YRS! Do you honestly think every person out there is some fucking moron to buy your bullshit? Ah and yes every Commie has to be thin as a stick right? You're stupid.
You would have to be a fool to believe Ron Paul is a racist. He was in error for not catching these writings certainly but that doesn't turn this silk purse into a sow's ear. If you know about the man at all, you also know he could never be a racist! He is the only one who fights for all of our rights and our liberties, regardless of skin color. Would a racist vote to enact Martin Luther King Day? Get a clue and do the homework people!!!
@msks231 Only you believe in Ron Paul's racism dontcha? Hypocrite. You shouldn't be talking about others when your hero is a homophobe racist douchebag.
That double standard is justified by the fact black people were whipped and forced to work without pay for HUNDREDS of years. It's a fact more black people struggle with poverty than whites. Poverty leads to crime and violence. It's a vicious cycle, but instead of pointing it out someone needs to help end it.
Ron Paul is a REAL Nigga.. NEVER a Rascit. Talks about Ending the Drug War and the System targets Blacks.. Wants to End 60% blacks in Prison for Drugs. He talk just like MLK if you would listen to him. Fighting for LIBERTY for all which is totally ANIT-Rascit! He NEVER SAID anything like that.. Listen to HIM yourself
Criticism of Ron Paul is just fine....as long as you can support the criticism with facts. And FACTS are exactly what you are lacking. You might as well tell us that extra-terrestrials are controlling the world and the loch ness monster lives in hawaii now. Nobody is going to believe your hate message because of two things. First, it IS a message of hatred, and secondly, you have no solid information to back up your claim. Those newsletters were written by somebody not associated with Ron Paul.
@FormerDemforRonPaul Ah yes so for 33 yrs Ron Paul never knew about it. He only made money. It was only in his name. He was the editor and all that shit that comes with owning the letter. So yeah I buy your shit lmao! So why wasn't anyone ever held accountable? Why does the filth go back for 33 yrs?
@atchisrj1 And lol sorry hon but my little comment to you takes no time at all. It's hardly a dent in my day. Maybe you should worry about your own life, neh?
Do you work for Rupert Murdoch? If you can't get anything on someone, just call them a racist? Know your ememy buddy it's is'nt Ron Paul!! It's Barack Obama and his friends at the Federal Reserve (the 1%). END THE FED!! and all will prosper!!! Open your eyes.
Here's more excerpts from the great not-racist Ron Paul
"The criminals who terrorize our cities -- in riots and on every non-riot day -- are not exclusively young black males, but they largely are. As children, they are trained to hate whites, to believe that white oppression is responsible for all black ills, to 'fight the power,' to steal and loot as much money from the white enemy as possible."
He calls Martin Luther King Jr a "pro-Communist philanderer."
According to the Raun Paul Political Report, the looting of the 1992 LA riots was a natural byproduct of government indulging the black community with “‘civil rights,’ quotas, mandated hiring preferences, set-asides for government contracts, gerrymandered voting districts, black bureaucracies, black mayors, black curricula in schools, black tv shows, black tv anchors, hate crime laws, and public humiliation for anyone who dares question the black agenda.”
Ugh, the Paultards are out in full force. Apparently, criticism of their dear leader is not very welcome.
Ron Paul has the support of Stormfront. In fact, there is a photo of him with the son of the Stormfront leader. There actually was a donation link to Ron Paul's campaign on Stormfront.
He doesn't support the Civil Rights act. Paul said he would vote against the law because it imposed unfair rules on what private businesses can and cannot do.
” Racists believe that all individuals who share superficial physical characteristics are alike: as collectivists, racists think only in terms of groups. By encouraging Americans to adopt a group mentality, the advocates of so-called “diversity” actually perpetuate racism. You don’t have freedom because you are a hyphenated American; you have freedom because you are an individual, and that should be protected.” — Ron Paul
@Cookaloka Of course. You're in the wrong for pointing out that for 33 yrs this filth was in his newsletters. No one ever got in trouble for it whether he wrote it or not. Why is that? Isn't it interesting if he's so against racism and shit no one ever got in trouble? I know if it was me I would have shitted that person away so fast they wouldn't know what hit them. I can't stand that crap. Don't forget he has praised that Duke asshole.
@Cookaloka Don't forget he's also anti woman. He's supported bills in the past that's all the "pro-life" shit. So you see "liberty" and "Freedom" aren't for us silly women. We have to have a manly man like "Dr Ron Paul" to tell us what to do whether or not he's our actual doctor. Only he knows what's best for my body and personal well being.
Another leftard pulling the race card. This is all these morons can do when they hear or see something they dont like. They make a predictable move of a dumb ass society. Funny that this is coming from an ass hole who admires Frederick Engels. Who by the way hated the Irish remember?
@Hailstorm68 Ah yes. Blame someone else instead of taking responsibility. I thought you libertarianshits were for "personal responsibility" and shit? I guess not for you all but for everyone else. If it's one of you you make up all sorts of pathetic excuses. I take it you haven't actually read the newsletters. I have and it's disgusting and I find it just so so disgusting and very telling of an individual's character that you're defending this shit. Says a lot about you.
@LittlePinky82 Oh Im so hurt. Oh waa! Im defending Ron Paul from this cock sucker whos wearing a stupid costume while making videos in his moms basement. Boo hoo! Go bother somebody else with your trolling bullshit you faceless troll bitch.
Topics: Terrorism, War, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, The Secrets Of Human Essence And Happiness, THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, About the END OF THE WORLD, Debated issues, and many others.
Websites: balanceddiet1.yolasite.com, etc.
See Figure 4, which is THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, at figure4etc3.yolasite.com, etc.
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com, announcements-balancedway.yolasite.com, etc.
@N0rCalGhost No that's a bunch of bullshit Never in my life have I ever hated anyone because of any reason. My parents taught me love and respect and to treat people as they are not because of anything else. SO YOU SHUT THE FUCK UP!
Communists don't get to criticize ANYONE. Are you aware of how many people communists have killed for any number of reasons? Are you aware of how many people Mao killed?
@beabillybob11now Ah yes. That old bullshit. You must really think people are idiots. Who was it who got fired for it than? Why did the filth go on for 33 yrs? Answer that shit.
are you a communist pointing a finger at someone and calling them a racist. i know racist people have killed people but didn't chairman Mao kill more ppl than hitler the Nazi
What an idiot...I could scan that piece of paper into my computer and have said it was Ronald Reagan's ghost who wrote that. You people have way too much time on your hands, some escapee from the psych ward u r
My God, a carjacked citizen shooting in self-defense, what a crime! This crap is absolutely bogus, but even if the comments were true they'd be alot less offensive than the life of your hero Mao Tse Dung. At least you're open with your political stripes. A hardcore authoritarian communist demonizing Ron Paul. There's no credibility gap there. Viva Fidel!!
@NCIcaucus Did you watch the video at all? It does give facts. You just have horse-blinders on, you see the word Mao and you start flying off the handle, typing barley legible insults and don't pay attention to anything that was in the video.
@promdawg Some video with some idiot I've never seen before referencing a poorly copied document that has no view of anything that is Ron Paul's. I could have typed it up myself and scanned into my computer. I can't remember how I came across this silliness but wasted my time. Keep up the hard work, we're just getting started here.
I wonder how so many diverse groups could come together and be so vehemently against Ron Paul. When I hear Paul speak of what he believes, I never hear anything but individual rights, sound money and small government. And that's the point. All the groups protesting Paul have one thing in common. They're all group oriented leaning toward large controling central governments. In other words, Paul is a direct threat to the central power grabbers and low level socialists just play into those hands.
He speaks alot of rhetoric until you delve deeper.
Nationally he uses spin time to make good sounding claims, but when it comes to personal writings and speeches, he opens up a bit more and it would astonish alot of people to know his true views, and they arent as healthy as we would think.
@hozehd In many states, killing a carjacker is illegal if you have the means to be non-lethal or run.
Its your home in which you have the right to kill on sight in some states.
I dont know about texas, but would be surprised if killing on the street is simply legal just because a robber tried to carjack you, especially if he was unarmed.
@waltermh111 First off, most carjackings require a gun to prevent the driver from just driving away. Most states including Texas have castle doctrine laws which specifically state that you have no duty to retreat. Even if you are in your car, as a car is considered a dwelling. Texas is no exception, your vehicle is a position you are under legal rights of defending in Texas. So when this jack ass says Paul was telling people to break the law he is just plain lying.
@hozehd I assume carjacking can also mean stealing a car that is unoccupied, but assuming it only means a car with a person in it, your right and keith likely is only thinking of the law in his own state or city and it woiuld be nice to hear Pauls ideas on this in states that do not have such a law.
Still, a civilised society shouldnt resort to killing for a theft. But then texas is a prety sick state.
@waltermh111 If your not in the car when it gets stolen its not called carjacking, furthermore, you have no right to use deadly force to protect it. Unless of course your kids are in the car at the time of the theft. States without castle doctrine laws aren't worth living in in my opinion. Its not about killing to prevent theft its about killing to defend yourself. Your car in most states is as defendable as your home because they are both considered dwellings.
Fucking moron... why don't you go back to preaching your fail ideology. Or better yet, take your dumb ass to China, you can experience a Marxist Utopian first had.
@evoval So Ron Paul being th editor of a newsletter is communist propaganda?
Are denying the fact which Ron Paul even admits to?
Or are you telling Ron Paul to get a life, though I wouldnt consider him communist, yet it makes more sense then complaining about the truth being spread.
It's pretty much a given on where Ron Paul stands, including his son as well, Rand Paul. Didn't surprise me one bit on how Rand's campaign was getting help in his funds by Stormfront, that neo-nazi white nationalist group. Keep sticking it to them, comrade.
@RedAntLiberationArmy Man, did you watch the "Ron Paul and Social Alienation" video? RP's supporters are delusional and misinformed. They think the system gives them their freedoms, and the only reason for their lack of freedom are a few bad politicians, never understanding that the system is inherently fucked.
@juliaisafilmbuff123 Yes I have. The supporters are definitely out-of-tune with reality & have no connections with the working class. Just a bunch of bourgeoisie - bourgeois constitutionalists. They'll never liberate the working class. Fuck them.
@dawzon But the standard of living greatly increased under their rule. If that to you doesn't justify marxist-leninist-maoist socialism then tell me how the "freedom" in capitalist societies justifies capitalism.
@juliaisafilmbuff123 Because they slaughtered millions of paople and supressed freedom of speech, freedom of religion and anyone else that dissented. Freedom, obviously, allows you to have a voice and say the things you are saying to me now julia...then to manifest that onto the world according to your ability. I very much disagree with what you say, but isn`t it wonderful that we are allow to have this discussion in the first place.
@dawzon Like I said, the capitalist system didn't give me freedom of speech; rather it PERMITTED me and others to have it after people demanded it. You can say all you want about the bill of rights but tell me how much freedom of speech you have in your workplace if you tell your co-workers you think you should unionize and your capitalist boss overhears you.
@juliaisafilmbuff123 you have the right to unionize. similarily your boss has a right to compose his labour force the way he sees fit. If you were terminated because of something that you said, without just cause, you have a right to take your boss to court for wrongful dismissal. To be honest julia, the moment you supported mao and stalin I can't take you seriously at all. note that the capitalist system is a product of Anglo-american common law.a result of legal freedoms. not vice versa
@dawzon I never said I supported Mao or Stalin. I said you could make an argument for those systems based on the rise of the standard of living.
The right to unionize wasn't because of capitalism. People fought for that right as well. Look up American labor history and you'll notice how bloody it is and how capitalist bosses did everything in their power to keep their workforce down. I have friends who are trying to unionize their workplaces and are risking being fired because of it. Freedom?
And for the record, Ron Paul is NO friend of the working people. He voted against the Employee Free Choice Act (the act that would make it easier to join a union).
Quit putting any stake in politicians. Organize your community if you want more freedom. Don't expect those on top to grant you anything.
@juliaisafilmbuff123 Maybe you're ignorant of what skills are required to be the boss. If your boss has less skill than you then why aren't you the boss?
Looking at all the RP supporters commenting here, it proves everything in the Ron Paul-social alienation vid. These people who fanatically support RP and who pounce on anyone who remotely criticizes the guy are people who are frustrated and put all of their faith in RP (a politician) instead of the people around them. They are delusional enough to think RP will solve all their problems and that's why he deserves to be worshipped like a sacred cow.
@juliaisafilmbuff123 That is so not true. there are many things which I, for one, do not agree with that ron paul believes. When you accuse someone of being racist it is a charged debate from the get go ebecause the stakes are high and the subject is so polarized. Those people who think ron paul will solve thier problems are indeed delusional. But he represents a different philosophy that is attractive to those who are are tired of an unaccountable executive and ever growing federal power
@dawzon Change doesn't come from above but from below (i.e. people demanding their rights). Politicians like RP won't give you any "liberty". The capitalist system is far from liberty-granting anyway (look up US history when workers were working 14 hours a day for very little and see how little the market was regulated). Why do you even put any stake in RP anyway? Politicians only permit people to have freedom after the people struggle for it. They don't "grant" it out of generosity.
@juliaisafilmbuff123 I agree with you that change comes from the people ultimately, but that does not make politicians or the rule of law irrelevant. The constitution and the bill of rights are designed to protect the people from the over-reach of government from infringements on the freedoms which it enshrines. To me this is not just a debate about personalities, but about legality. This is one of the main rasons why i support paul.
@dawzon Actually, politicians should be irrelevant. No politician has ever given people freedom. Again, they only allow people to have freedom after the people demand it. And what makes you think RP would be so easy to permit people to have freedom? This guy wants to set the USA back to 1800. There is a reason why the US is no longer a laissez fair capitalist country. All of the major struggles have been AGAINST LFC and the oppression that goes with it.
As well, the US constitution is hardly about protecting liberties. Look up Michael Parenti's "Myth of the FoundingFathers" speech. The constitution was written to protect the private property and wealth of the ultra-rich minority from the demands of the majority poor. Hardly "freedom"!
@juliaisafilmbuff123 I certainly don`t trust politicians, but what would you suggest as an alternative. I propose following the rule of law in order to constrain government power and to place more resposibility in the hands of citizens. (I think we may agree to some extent.) Except. Capitalism has created the freeest most, prosperous society in the history of civilization...socialism has always preyed off the ingenuity of capitalists and has always failed as a result.
@dawzon Read Michael Albert's "Parecon" if you want an alternative. Look at the Paris Commune or anarchist Catalonia.
"Capitalism has created the freeest most, prosperous society in the history of civilization..."
Define "freest". Is the chaining of a 12-year old girl to a desk to make shoes for Nike part of "freedom"? There was laissez fair capitalism in the US many years ago and the result was mass poverty. It was only when workers began unionizing that living standards increased.
@juliaisafilmbuff123 I`ve never read thses and I will take a look. Chaining people up is against the law in America...while foriegn labour is a big problem, I hardly think that this is the result of America`s system but rather that lack of any rule of law in forign countries...who are taken advantage of by terrible people. Mass poverty in the united states is negligible when compared to the rest of the world.
@dawzon Most third-world leaders are bought off by American companies. Yes, it is the capitalist system. Socialist countries don't sell their people out to American businesses.
Mass poverty in the US is something we should be looking at. I live in New Hampshire (the most "free market" state). In our major cities (Nashua and Manchester) there is third-world-like poverty due to lack of welfare and a minimum wage of 7 bucks an hour (lower than most states). Tell me if that's "freedom".
@juliaisafilmbuff123 that is not to say that there are not many problems with capitalism as well, but that in the short expiriment of freedom that is america, it has been immensely sucessful relative to other forms of government.
@dawzon Define "successful". The USSR was successful in raising living standards in less than a generation. Mao's China was successful in bringing rights to women and caring for the poor and sick (i.e. barefoot doctors). The US government only feared Soviet-style marxism because it was the model for the third world to go through quick modernization in less than a generation.
Racecard, gotta love it. The mainstream politicians ruin the nation by overspending, taking you to needless wars and keeping the fat cats happy, but as long as they are political correct and they say they care for the minorities, they are loved and reelected. Ron Paul has known whats wrong with the country since the 70 and how monitary, foreign and social policy needs to change to correct it. But no, you find these papers written and prefer ppl that scam millions and bomb thousands. Sheeep!
@AkaiShizuku If you listen to his message you would realize its the most anti-racist one. The indivudualism where you are judge as an individual and where you have economic and social liberty, where you provide for yourself in other words, is the most anti racial policy. The whole collectivism where some are supposed to work for others and where ppl are forced into programs is what creats fractions and racism. And thats the policy the other politicians keep. They need racism and hate for votes.
@CortoMaltese86 People are not "forced" into collectivist programs. People lived in collectivist societies in harmony for centuries. It was only when people began hoarding resources and developed private property that things went to hell. Racism is a result of the system. Capitalists use racism as a way to divide and conquer the people to prevent people from organizing against the system. Likewise, monarchies also used racism for this purpose.
@juliaisafilmbuff123 Eh, ppl are forced into social security, which is a ponzi scheme a la Madoff, and also to pay for unemployment benefits etc. And youre confusing capitalism with corporatism which you have in usa today and which obama (and bush) are a part of.
As for collective societys, noone forced ppl to it like today. They did it of free will cause they gained by it. Im not against collectivism or organisations, just as long as noone is forced to anything. That way you get good ones.
@AkaiShizuku I dont defend the content in these newsletters but they contradict everything else he's said and the consequenses of the libertarian philosophy. Dont judge him only by this and look at the enourmous crimes comitted by this administration and the ones before it.
@AkaiShizuku Water it down? the whole peice was built on assumptions. this is an old debate which, was dealt with about a decade ago and is only brought up for political reasons today. Ron paul has never written anything even remotely similar to that kind of language, which he has denounced time and time again.Can you read minds?If you have done any research into Paul you would realize that this is so far from his perspective, or the manner and subject matter of which he writes and speaks.
@dawzon Ron Paul is a politician of the rich. Therefore, he lies. No offense, but it kind of makes you look like a tool when you actually believe what politicians say. Not only is Ron Paul closely associated with various KKK members and neo-Nazis (Stormfront openly supports Ron Paul, this is not news), but you've obviously never heard of the Ron Paul Political Report, which contains various blatantly racist quotes from the douche himself.
@AkaiShizuku the regrettable support paul get from such groups are because paul believes in freedom to an extent that would be to thier benefit in terms of freedom of speech. This is a far cry from supporting racism as an ideology. I have heard of the report...it was written by a disgruntled employee without his knowledge. If you listen to what RP has to say, the way he speaks and the content of his ideas, it is the exact opposite of such thinking.
That doesn't answer Ron Paul's association with neo-Nazis and the KKK. It also doesn't answer the Ron Paul Political Report itself. The bottom line is that Ron Paul says one thing in private and then another in public. What Ron Paul says in private is homophobic, racist, and extremely bigoted. In addition, it's interesting how you talk about freedom of speech when hundreds of Rand/Paultards false flag MRN's channel.
@AkaiShizuku Ron paul does not associate himself with racist groups. he accepts votes from anybody because he believes in freedom of thought. you are trying to confound a very important distinction. You assume to know what Paul thinks in private...this is a weak position imo. Everything I have ever seen from the man has been in support of freedom for individuals(and a concurrent distaste for group affiliations)I agree, it is lame to `false flag"...but u seem to confuse this somehow with paul
@AkaiShizuku Again, you proport to know what he thinks. I don`t believe that ron paul is racist based on everything that I have heard him say or write. not based on what other people have written in his name..which he has denounced many times. The media did not even follow up with this story because it had already been resolved back then. The writer was a rouge employee. Paul should have read his news letters, to be sure...but this is simply antithetical to the ideas which he supports.
why would you call yourself Maoist rebel? he was a butcher.
Paul is not a racist and your supposed proof would never hold up in court. this debate is tiresome...it was put to rest about a decade ago. he never speaks of anything resembling racist ideology and doesn't support that type of thinking. Libertarianism in itself rejects the notion of thinking about people according to race, culture or beliefs... but focuses on maximizing freedom for the individual. Paul is a staunch libertarian.
@juliaisafilmbuff123 It is true that paul should be responsible for overseeing the contents of the newsletters. I think anyone would awknowledge that, as paul has himself (many times ad nauseum). it was a disgruntled employee.That fact does not make paul a racist. his constituants continue to vote for him because paul has never used such language, which is so obviously written by someone else..language which he denounced and has never even remotely reflected in his writings or speeches.
@dawzon So what if he later "denounced" it? RP needs to take responsibility and his fanatical supporters who would defend him no matter what need to stop putting all their faith in a politician whose job is to serve the status quo.
@juliaisafilmbuff123 It matters because the issue is whether he is racist or not, which is an easy label to throw around(but is not true in this case.) You think RP represents the status quo? I've never heard that before. Maybe you should research the man b4 you comment (I don't mean this as an insult.) RP is very much an outsider in most circles in washington circles....Paul is more closely aligned with politicians of the past who believed in free markets, constitutional historicism, ect.
@dawzon The only reason RP is in power in the first place is because he supports the status quo, not because he's rebelling against it. Being labeled an "outsider" because you call for an extreme amount of de-regulation for industry and a weaker federal government doesn't mean shit. RP is part of the elite social system known as US politics. The people who support him believe change comes from politicians, which it does not. All the freedoms you enjoy you have because of people's struggles.
why would you call yourself Maoist rebel? he was a butcher.
Paul is not a racist and your supposed proof would never hold up in court. this debate is tiresome...it was put to rest about a decade ago. he never speaks of anything resembling racist ideology and doesn't support that type of thinking. Libertarianism in itself rejects the notion of thinking about people according to race, culture or beliefs... but focuses on maximizing freedom for the individual. Paul is a staunch libertarian.
I remember the Ron Paul fans a few years ago - but the more I read into Ron Paul the more confused I got regarding how people could honestly take him seriously. People so desperately want a messiah that they're willing to overlook a laundry list of flaws just to achieve it. I find it more confusing that Ron Paul reads Ayn Rand books yet ignores the massive chapter in 'Virtue of Selfishness' which calls racism the lowest and most primitive form of collectivist mindset.
@kawaiigardiner Ayn Rand was openly racist. She said the indigenous peoples of the Americans "deserved" to be slaughtered by Europeans because their culture was "inferior". She said the same of the Palestinians being slaughtered by Israel. To say she wasn't racist is a joke and that passage from her book is more like a strawman of collectivism than anything else.
@juliaisafilmbuff123 I read her argument and I'd say that it is an argument of 'might makes right' rather than racism - racism would be linking race to be inherently inferior where as her statement was simply that 'we are more advanced than those people' with no statement of race. Interesting enough she does rally against collectivism and yet quite happy to be a flag waving ardent supporter of the United States - isn't patriotism and nationalism just other forms collectivism?
@juliaisafilmbuff123 She ignores one brand of collectivism and praises another when it suits her interests; she talks about freedom of speech on one hand and then appears at the 'committee for unamerican activities' to name and shame 'known communists'. Then there are her quirks; good lord, if you have a beard you are apparently hiding something, if you're gay then you're immoral (her evidence, "oh, its self evident"). She is an example of a irrational person parading as a rational one.
@MaoistRebelNews2 This video is complete bullshit, showing your true colors, I bet you are proud that Communism "Materialist Philosophy" has been responsible for over 120 million deaths in the 20th Century, you discredited yourself when you opened your mouth!
quietman1k 1 month ago
This video is stupid. Go shit yourself. You blocked ratings because you know everyone would DISLIKE your crappy excuse for a video. Stop wasting our time you misinformed, ignorant, uneducated troll.
ogiedude7 2 months ago
We are to believe a communist? SERIOUS???
blessedmamaof10 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
When did it become racist to criticize violent blacks or criticize the system of dependency and victim-hood and double racial standards.You say 33 years(wrong) worth of letters but 3 article out of thousands.the offending ones were during the wave of drug and gang violence that was sweeping the nation. Blacks have been given every luxury to succeed except one -The War on Drugs. A white man critical of blacks and what they do. Come on.
Mao was the biggest racist of them + mil. of dead Chinese.
aBRUSHforCONFUCIUS 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
When did it become racist to criticize violent blacks or criticize the system of dependency and victim-hood and double racial standards.You say 33 years(wrong) worth of letters but 3 article out of thousands.the offending ones were during the wave of drug and gang violence that was sweeping the nation. Blacks have been given every luxury to succeed except one -The War on Drugs. A white man critical of blacks and what they do. Come on.
Mao was the biggest racist of them + mil. of dead Chinese.
aBRUSHforCONFUCIUS 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
When did it become racist to criticize violent blacks or criticize the system of dependency and victim-hood and double racial standards.You say 33 years(wrong) worth of letters but 3 article out of thousands.the offending ones were during the wave of drug and gang violence that was sweeping the nation. Blacks have been given every luxury to succeed except one -The War on Drugs. A white man critical of blacks and what they do. Come on.
Mao was the biggest racist of them + mil. of dead Chinese.
aBRUSHforCONFUCIUS 2 months ago
When did it become racist to criticize violent blacks or criticize the system of dependency and victim-hood and double racial standards.You say 33 years(wrong) worth of letters but 3 article out of thousands.the offending ones were during the wave of drug and gang violence that was sweeping the nation. Blacks have been given every luxury to succeed except one -The War on Drugs. A white man critical of blacks and what they do. Come on.
Mao was the biggest racist of them + mil. of dead Chinese.
aBRUSHforCONFUCIUS 2 months ago
@LittlePinky82 You posted comments on christmas day? What a freak!
msks231 2 months ago
@msks231 Ooo you showed me didn't you?
LittlePinky82 2 months ago
@LittlePinky82 You posted comments on christmaa day?
msks231 2 months ago
If you go back farther in the 1990's he didn't deny anything. There's video of him in the late 90's talking about it. And at least once in the past Congress had some type of resolution or whatever you call it praising the passage of the Civil Rights Act and Ron Paul was the only person to vote against it. He's been on Alex Jones's show plenty of times. I'm sure you can find all sorts of shit from that.
LittlePinky82 2 months ago
The thing I find amusing about all this shit is this crap has happened in these newsletters for 33 damn yrs. So Paultards expect others to believe that for 33 yrs he never once knew these words were being written and spread out to his subscribers. That no one ever got held accountable for these words. Why hasn't he said "oh so and so was fired over that" but since I first found out about these papers back in 2004 I never have seen who was held accountable. Paultards: not everyone is a moron.
LittlePinky82 2 months ago
@KarateMastR57 Pfft he's not Anti-war. He's anti fed govt. If the fed govt is involved he's against it. He's also someone who is for isolation. But he has taken money from well known white racists and associates with them.
LittlePinky82 2 months ago
You're an idiot.
scottblanks 2 months ago
Needling was the true it happened in New York in 1989. It was the thing to do jab white women with needles. Macy's store N.Y. in the fall on 1989. Many blacks hate whites and many whites hate blacks. The newsletters were blog of the day. Does Ariana Huffington know everything on hers? If you love Mao that racist pedophile why are you not in China. Oh yeah the Chinese took down the mass murderers statues expect Tienanmen sq. where thousands died. Pretty fat for a commie. They hate him.
aBRUSHforCONFUCIUS 2 months ago
@aBRUSHforCONFUCIUS Riiight but I'm sure Arianna would at least take responsibility when she first heard about it and fired the person who wrote the horrible filth but no Ron Paul let this person (snark) write their filth for 33 DAMN YRS! Do you honestly think every person out there is some fucking moron to buy your bullshit? Ah and yes every Commie has to be thin as a stick right? You're stupid.
LittlePinky82 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You would have to be a fool to believe Ron Paul is a racist. He was in error for not catching these writings certainly but that doesn't turn this silk purse into a sow's ear. If you know about the man at all, you also know he could never be a racist! He is the only one who fights for all of our rights and our liberties, regardless of skin color. Would a racist vote to enact Martin Luther King Day? Get a clue and do the homework people!!!
Ron Paul 2012!!!!!!!!!!
maineronyt 2 months ago
lul, look at this hipster
zig3 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The ghost writer of the news letters wrote that he did not vote for Martin Luther King Day and Ron Paul did in fact vote for it.
Note: Newt Gingrich voted against it.
CNN Poll: Ron Paul leads with minorities in GOP field
Ron Paul 25%
Mitt Romney 20%
Michelle Bachmann 18%
Rick Perry 17%
Newt Gingrich 15%
AreaOfThoughts 2 months ago
Lulz this just made my favorites, this was linked to one of mine in the side bar hahahaha
Laughingblades 2 months ago
Shut your hole you fucking commy. No one believes in your racist propoganda. We aint stupid you frigging red neck corn fed racist ass
msks231 2 months ago
@msks231 Only you believe in Ron Paul's racism dontcha? Hypocrite. You shouldn't be talking about others when your hero is a homophobe racist douchebag.
LittlePinky82 2 months ago
lmao, yeah I'm going to listen to someone standing in front of a hammer and sickle
mhoyer01 2 months ago
@mhoyer01 So why are you on here than? Shoo!
LittlePinky82 2 months ago
That double standard is justified by the fact black people were whipped and forced to work without pay for HUNDREDS of years. It's a fact more black people struggle with poverty than whites. Poverty leads to crime and violence. It's a vicious cycle, but instead of pointing it out someone needs to help end it.
BasicallyImPro 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ron Paul is a REAL Nigga.. NEVER a Rascit. Talks about Ending the Drug War and the System targets Blacks.. Wants to End 60% blacks in Prison for Drugs. He talk just like MLK if you would listen to him. Fighting for LIBERTY for all which is totally ANIT-Rascit! He NEVER SAID anything like that.. Listen to HIM yourself
Maday14 2 months ago
Criticism of Ron Paul is just fine....as long as you can support the criticism with facts. And FACTS are exactly what you are lacking. You might as well tell us that extra-terrestrials are controlling the world and the loch ness monster lives in hawaii now. Nobody is going to believe your hate message because of two things. First, it IS a message of hatred, and secondly, you have no solid information to back up your claim. Those newsletters were written by somebody not associated with Ron Paul.
FormerDemforRonPaul 2 months ago
@FormerDemforRonPaul Ah yes so for 33 yrs Ron Paul never knew about it. He only made money. It was only in his name. He was the editor and all that shit that comes with owning the letter. So yeah I buy your shit lmao! So why wasn't anyone ever held accountable? Why does the filth go back for 33 yrs?
LittlePinky82 2 months ago
What an ignorant post. No wonder you blocked ratings.
atchisrj1 3 months ago 5
@atchisrj1 Yes, because you sure did prove your claims didn't you? LMAO.
LittlePinky82 2 months ago
@LittlePinky82 Eat it Toll.
atchisrj1 2 months ago
@atchisrj1 Ooo your so tough and macho and sure showed me didn't you? How pathetic.
LittlePinky82 2 months ago
@atchisrj1 And "toll"? Don't you mean "troll"? At least get it right...Sheesh.
LittlePinky82 2 months ago
@atchisrj1 And by the way last time I checked this isn't your page so who the hell are you to call someone else a "toll" (lol)?
LittlePinky82 2 months ago
@LittlePinky82 So says the troll. Bye-bye troll.
atchisrj1 2 months ago
@atchisrj1 At least you figured out how to spell "troll."
LittlePinky82 2 months ago
@LittlePinky82 Get a life troll. before I have to spank you.
atchisrj1 2 months ago
@atchisrj1 Ah violence. Who do you think you are? My father lol. Someone likes it kinky dontcha?
LittlePinky82 2 months ago
@atchisrj1 And lol sorry hon but my little comment to you takes no time at all. It's hardly a dent in my day. Maybe you should worry about your own life, neh?
LittlePinky82 2 months ago
@atchisrj1 I will find it very amusing if you respond to me again after telling me to get a life. Hahahahaha. Watch I bet you will.
LittlePinky82 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Do you work for Rupert Murdoch? If you can't get anything on someone, just call them a racist? Know your ememy buddy it's is'nt Ron Paul!! It's Barack Obama and his friends at the Federal Reserve (the 1%). END THE FED!! and all will prosper!!! Open your eyes.
Conanraaka 4 months ago
Comment removed
sukamugen 6 months ago
Here's more excerpts from the great not-racist Ron Paul
"The criminals who terrorize our cities -- in riots and on every non-riot day -- are not exclusively young black males, but they largely are. As children, they are trained to hate whites, to believe that white oppression is responsible for all black ills, to 'fight the power,' to steal and loot as much money from the white enemy as possible."
He calls Martin Luther King Jr a "pro-Communist philanderer."
Cookaloka 6 months ago
According to the Raun Paul Political Report, the looting of the 1992 LA riots was a natural byproduct of government indulging the black community with “‘civil rights,’ quotas, mandated hiring preferences, set-asides for government contracts, gerrymandered voting districts, black bureaucracies, black mayors, black curricula in schools, black tv shows, black tv anchors, hate crime laws, and public humiliation for anyone who dares question the black agenda.”
PART 2
Cookaloka 6 months ago
Ugh, the Paultards are out in full force. Apparently, criticism of their dear leader is not very welcome.
Ron Paul has the support of Stormfront. In fact, there is a photo of him with the son of the Stormfront leader. There actually was a donation link to Ron Paul's campaign on Stormfront.
He doesn't support the Civil Rights act. Paul said he would vote against the law because it imposed unfair rules on what private businesses can and cannot do.
PART 1
Cookaloka 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
” Racists believe that all individuals who share superficial physical characteristics are alike: as collectivists, racists think only in terms of groups. By encouraging Americans to adopt a group mentality, the advocates of so-called “diversity” actually perpetuate racism. You don’t have freedom because you are a hyphenated American; you have freedom because you are an individual, and that should be protected.” — Ron Paul
vechorik 5 months ago
@Cookaloka Of course. You're in the wrong for pointing out that for 33 yrs this filth was in his newsletters. No one ever got in trouble for it whether he wrote it or not. Why is that? Isn't it interesting if he's so against racism and shit no one ever got in trouble? I know if it was me I would have shitted that person away so fast they wouldn't know what hit them. I can't stand that crap. Don't forget he has praised that Duke asshole.
LittlePinky82 2 months ago
@Cookaloka Don't forget he's also anti woman. He's supported bills in the past that's all the "pro-life" shit. So you see "liberty" and "Freedom" aren't for us silly women. We have to have a manly man like "Dr Ron Paul" to tell us what to do whether or not he's our actual doctor. Only he knows what's best for my body and personal well being.
LittlePinky82 2 months ago
Another leftard pulling the race card. This is all these morons can do when they hear or see something they dont like. They make a predictable move of a dumb ass society. Funny that this is coming from an ass hole who admires Frederick Engels. Who by the way hated the Irish remember?
Hailstorm68 7 months ago
@Hailstorm68 Ah yes. Blame someone else instead of taking responsibility. I thought you libertarianshits were for "personal responsibility" and shit? I guess not for you all but for everyone else. If it's one of you you make up all sorts of pathetic excuses. I take it you haven't actually read the newsletters. I have and it's disgusting and I find it just so so disgusting and very telling of an individual's character that you're defending this shit. Says a lot about you.
LittlePinky82 2 months ago
@LittlePinky82 Oh Im so hurt. Oh waa! Im defending Ron Paul from this cock sucker whos wearing a stupid costume while making videos in his moms basement. Boo hoo! Go bother somebody else with your trolling bullshit you faceless troll bitch.
Hailstorm68 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NEW BOOK TO READ FOR YOUR ENJOYMENT
Topics: Terrorism, War, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, The Secrets Of Human Essence And Happiness, THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, About the END OF THE WORLD, Debated issues, and many others.
Websites: balanceddiet1.yolasite.com, etc.
See Figure 4, which is THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, at figure4etc3.yolasite.com, etc.
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com, announcements-balancedway.yolasite.com, etc.
TheServiceWeb 7 months ago
we're all racist, jackass....
N0rCalGhost 7 months ago
@N0rCalGhost No that's a bunch of bullshit Never in my life have I ever hated anyone because of any reason. My parents taught me love and respect and to treat people as they are not because of anything else. SO YOU SHUT THE FUCK UP!
LittlePinky82 2 months ago
the truth about ron paul, is very disturbing, even if he didnt write them, why would he ever associate himself with someone who would???
blastfamy915 8 months ago
Ron Paul 2012.
Communists don't get to criticize ANYONE. Are you aware of how many people communists have killed for any number of reasons? Are you aware of how many people Mao killed?
rctube1958 8 months ago
@rctube1958 Ah yes. Diverting away from the issue at hand. Let's ignore that your hero is a racist homophobic woman hater.
LittlePinky82 2 months ago
this guy thinks he castro, and instead of doing vids on youtube, should be locked up in a mental institution (but so should all libtards)
77sygzy 8 months ago
Maoists complaining about libertarians, what a hoot.
Shut your fat face, idiot.
henrycate 9 months ago
If you had actually read any of Ron Paul's writing, you would realize that this was not written by him. You have proved nothing. FAIL!
beabillybob11now 9 months ago
@beabillybob11now Ah yes. That old bullshit. You must really think people are idiots. Who was it who got fired for it than? Why did the filth go on for 33 yrs? Answer that shit.
LittlePinky82 2 months ago
you're a fucking idiot
unrealdook 9 months ago in playlist good stuff 2 3
The criminals fear Dr Ron for good reason.
ryanshaunkelly 10 months ago
ron paul is a facist racist right wing war monger puppet in for the money
ObamaWaffle 11 months ago
Hey, did you know Marx was racist too?
Here's proof:
"all blacks, Asians, and non-white minorities are second class citizens too the glorious white worker's class"- Karl Marx
But here's one that's definitely real about Jimmy Carter:
"...black..."-Carter
See, he said "black", he's a racist!
americasucks100 11 months ago
Thank you Facists for taking another life R.I.P Shamil Odamanov
evilfromtheorient 11 months ago
are you a communist pointing a finger at someone and calling them a racist. i know racist people have killed people but didn't chairman Mao kill more ppl than hitler the Nazi
trscsaeg 1 year ago
Oh, no! A white person daring to complain about being murdered by blacks! That's racist!
They should just get murdered quietly like good liberals.
foolcow1976 1 year ago
What an idiot...I could scan that piece of paper into my computer and have said it was Ronald Reagan's ghost who wrote that. You people have way too much time on your hands, some escapee from the psych ward u r
NCIcaucus 1 year ago
My God, a carjacked citizen shooting in self-defense, what a crime! This crap is absolutely bogus, but even if the comments were true they'd be alot less offensive than the life of your hero Mao Tse Dung. At least you're open with your political stripes. A hardcore authoritarian communist demonizing Ron Paul. There's no credibility gap there. Viva Fidel!!
P0LICEstateWATCH 1 year ago
If you can't debate the facts you just call someone a name. Fuck you and your communist shit. You' will go down hard!
NCIcaucus 1 year ago
@NCIcaucus Did you watch the video at all? It does give facts. You just have horse-blinders on, you see the word Mao and you start flying off the handle, typing barley legible insults and don't pay attention to anything that was in the video.
promdawg 1 year ago 2
@promdawg Some video with some idiot I've never seen before referencing a poorly copied document that has no view of anything that is Ron Paul's. I could have typed it up myself and scanned into my computer. I can't remember how I came across this silliness but wasted my time. Keep up the hard work, we're just getting started here.
NCIcaucus 1 year ago
@NCIcaucus His entire video is facts. RP promotes racist conspiracy theories.
juliaisafilmbuff123 1 year ago
@juliaisafilmbuff123 okay okay you're right...RP is a racist. Your a complete waste of o2
NCIcaucus 1 year ago
THANK YOU! OBAMA 2ND TERM.
ImCaking 1 year ago
hahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahah
alistairproductions 1 year ago
Ron Paul isn't a collectivist. Racism is a form of collectivism.
jerthemessiah 1 year ago
@jerthemessiah What does racism have to do with who controls the workplace?
juliaisafilmbuff123 1 year ago
you're so hot. not kidding around or trolling.
ComradeIndex 1 year ago
BULLSHIT
mmyr123 1 year ago
I wonder how so many diverse groups could come together and be so vehemently against Ron Paul. When I hear Paul speak of what he believes, I never hear anything but individual rights, sound money and small government. And that's the point. All the groups protesting Paul have one thing in common. They're all group oriented leaning toward large controling central governments. In other words, Paul is a direct threat to the central power grabbers and low level socialists just play into those hands.
mickeysears 1 year ago
@mickeysears Paul is a threat to everybody.
He speaks alot of rhetoric until you delve deeper.
Nationally he uses spin time to make good sounding claims, but when it comes to personal writings and speeches, he opens up a bit more and it would astonish alot of people to know his true views, and they arent as healthy as we would think.
waltermh111 1 year ago
Everybody knows the communist don't lie and manipulate the facts
Long live the Communist Party!
putittogether 1 year ago
@putittogether All sides can be said to do that.
But dispute, is Ron Paul the editor of the newsletter?
Dispute the claims of each newsletter by telling us your interpretation of the wordings?
Its easy to claim manipulation, its harder to dispute it with your own evidence.
But try for our sake :)
waltermh111 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
what a failure you are you brainless commy.
spol07 1 year ago
Its not illegal to keep a gun in your car and use it to defend yourself from a carjacker so why would you have to hide the gun. You fail.
hozehd 1 year ago
@hozehd In many states, killing a carjacker is illegal if you have the means to be non-lethal or run.
Its your home in which you have the right to kill on sight in some states.
I dont know about texas, but would be surprised if killing on the street is simply legal just because a robber tried to carjack you, especially if he was unarmed.
waltermh111 1 year ago
@waltermh111 First off, most carjackings require a gun to prevent the driver from just driving away. Most states including Texas have castle doctrine laws which specifically state that you have no duty to retreat. Even if you are in your car, as a car is considered a dwelling. Texas is no exception, your vehicle is a position you are under legal rights of defending in Texas. So when this jack ass says Paul was telling people to break the law he is just plain lying.
hozehd 1 year ago
@hozehd I assume carjacking can also mean stealing a car that is unoccupied, but assuming it only means a car with a person in it, your right and keith likely is only thinking of the law in his own state or city and it woiuld be nice to hear Pauls ideas on this in states that do not have such a law.
Still, a civilised society shouldnt resort to killing for a theft. But then texas is a prety sick state.
waltermh111 1 year ago
@waltermh111 If your not in the car when it gets stolen its not called carjacking, furthermore, you have no right to use deadly force to protect it. Unless of course your kids are in the car at the time of the theft. States without castle doctrine laws aren't worth living in in my opinion. Its not about killing to prevent theft its about killing to defend yourself. Your car in most states is as defendable as your home because they are both considered dwellings.
hozehd 1 year ago
hahaha Riiiiight! Ron Paul is a crypto-racist.
Fucking moron... why don't you go back to preaching your fail ideology. Or better yet, take your dumb ass to China, you can experience a Marxist Utopian first had.
wizkid2000 1 year ago
@wizkid2000
first hand*
wizkid2000 1 year ago
@wizkid2000 China is far from marxist and is in fact pushing capitalism pretty hard these days.
waltermh111 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
OtherJacobSpinney indeed
jsnki 1 year ago
OtherJacobSpinney
jurchenAZ 1 year ago
talk about a personal vendetta...
junior00bacon00chee 1 year ago 10
This has been flagged as spam show
I like how Ron Paul doesn't participate in class warfare. What's good for America is good for blacks.
"Thy BlackMan.com" compares Cain to Paul and chooses Paul!
Google "Ron Paul & Herman Cain's Different Philosophies" by Staff
Re: Israel, Google "Are Evangelical Christians Warmongers" by Pastor Chuck Baldwin
vechorik 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ron Paul is the only candidate that DOES NOT participate in class warfare:
Ron Paul re: pot and black/Latino Americans and racism:
/watch?v=nhP5PwG5Sks
I sent money to nominate Ron Paul, President 2012!
Champion of the Constitution and the only one that can save America!
vechorik 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NORTH KOREA IS THE BEST KOREA!!!!
Apptendo 1 year ago
NORTH KOREA IS THE BEST KOREA!!!!
Apptendo 1 year ago 5
Communist propaganda. Get a life loser, fuckin idiot!
evoval 1 year ago
@evoval So Ron Paul being th editor of a newsletter is communist propaganda?
Are denying the fact which Ron Paul even admits to?
Or are you telling Ron Paul to get a life, though I wouldnt consider him communist, yet it makes more sense then complaining about the truth being spread.
waltermh111 1 year ago
I love when people throw racism around haha.
Stupid video.
TheMango121 1 year ago
That's it? The same , stale,15 - 20 year old bullshit that nobody can verify. God Damn - quit wasting time on this.
uncomputerin 1 year ago
It's pretty much a given on where Ron Paul stands, including his son as well, Rand Paul. Didn't surprise me one bit on how Rand's campaign was getting help in his funds by Stormfront, that neo-nazi white nationalist group. Keep sticking it to them, comrade.
Red Love & Salutes!
RedAntLiberationArmy 1 year ago
@RedAntLiberationArmy Man, did you watch the "Ron Paul and Social Alienation" video? RP's supporters are delusional and misinformed. They think the system gives them their freedoms, and the only reason for their lack of freedom are a few bad politicians, never understanding that the system is inherently fucked.
juliaisafilmbuff123 1 year ago
@juliaisafilmbuff123 Yes I have. The supporters are definitely out-of-tune with reality & have no connections with the working class. Just a bunch of bourgeoisie - bourgeois constitutionalists. They'll never liberate the working class. Fuck them.
RedAntLiberationArmy 1 year ago
@ 2:15 he advised people to carry unregistered guns with them in the car, then dispose of it after they've shot someone.
DrBraids 1 year ago
Ron Paul racist rant are true, evidence here;
/watch?v=qy6PWNNrRT8
chewbaca1989 1 year ago
can you be serious about this julia...both Stalin and Mao were mass murderers.
dawzon 1 year ago
@dawzon But the standard of living greatly increased under their rule. If that to you doesn't justify marxist-leninist-maoist socialism then tell me how the "freedom" in capitalist societies justifies capitalism.
juliaisafilmbuff123 1 year ago
@juliaisafilmbuff123 Because they slaughtered millions of paople and supressed freedom of speech, freedom of religion and anyone else that dissented. Freedom, obviously, allows you to have a voice and say the things you are saying to me now julia...then to manifest that onto the world according to your ability. I very much disagree with what you say, but isn`t it wonderful that we are allow to have this discussion in the first place.
dawzon 1 year ago
@dawzon Like I said, the capitalist system didn't give me freedom of speech; rather it PERMITTED me and others to have it after people demanded it. You can say all you want about the bill of rights but tell me how much freedom of speech you have in your workplace if you tell your co-workers you think you should unionize and your capitalist boss overhears you.
juliaisafilmbuff123 1 year ago
@juliaisafilmbuff123 you have the right to unionize. similarily your boss has a right to compose his labour force the way he sees fit. If you were terminated because of something that you said, without just cause, you have a right to take your boss to court for wrongful dismissal. To be honest julia, the moment you supported mao and stalin I can't take you seriously at all. note that the capitalist system is a product of Anglo-american common law.a result of legal freedoms. not vice versa
dawzon 1 year ago
@dawzon I never said I supported Mao or Stalin. I said you could make an argument for those systems based on the rise of the standard of living.
The right to unionize wasn't because of capitalism. People fought for that right as well. Look up American labor history and you'll notice how bloody it is and how capitalist bosses did everything in their power to keep their workforce down. I have friends who are trying to unionize their workplaces and are risking being fired because of it. Freedom?
juliaisafilmbuff123 1 year ago
And for the record, Ron Paul is NO friend of the working people. He voted against the Employee Free Choice Act (the act that would make it easier to join a union).
Quit putting any stake in politicians. Organize your community if you want more freedom. Don't expect those on top to grant you anything.
juliaisafilmbuff123 1 year ago
@juliaisafilmbuff123
Fuck unions. I don't want someone with less skills to make the same as me.
TheMango121 1 year ago
@TheMango121 That's nice. I don't want my boss who has less skills than me to steal some of the value I generated...
juliaisafilmbuff123 1 year ago
@juliaisafilmbuff123 Maybe you're ignorant of what skills are required to be the boss. If your boss has less skill than you then why aren't you the boss?
tarossi400 1 year ago
Stick'em up, white bitches! I've got an "R" word and I'm not afraid to use it! Dance rednecks, dance!
Bolverkson1984 1 year ago
Looking at all the RP supporters commenting here, it proves everything in the Ron Paul-social alienation vid. These people who fanatically support RP and who pounce on anyone who remotely criticizes the guy are people who are frustrated and put all of their faith in RP (a politician) instead of the people around them. They are delusional enough to think RP will solve all their problems and that's why he deserves to be worshipped like a sacred cow.
juliaisafilmbuff123 1 year ago
@juliaisafilmbuff123 That is so not true. there are many things which I, for one, do not agree with that ron paul believes. When you accuse someone of being racist it is a charged debate from the get go ebecause the stakes are high and the subject is so polarized. Those people who think ron paul will solve thier problems are indeed delusional. But he represents a different philosophy that is attractive to those who are are tired of an unaccountable executive and ever growing federal power
dawzon 1 year ago
@dawzon Change doesn't come from above but from below (i.e. people demanding their rights). Politicians like RP won't give you any "liberty". The capitalist system is far from liberty-granting anyway (look up US history when workers were working 14 hours a day for very little and see how little the market was regulated). Why do you even put any stake in RP anyway? Politicians only permit people to have freedom after the people struggle for it. They don't "grant" it out of generosity.
juliaisafilmbuff123 1 year ago
@juliaisafilmbuff123 I agree with you that change comes from the people ultimately, but that does not make politicians or the rule of law irrelevant. The constitution and the bill of rights are designed to protect the people from the over-reach of government from infringements on the freedoms which it enshrines. To me this is not just a debate about personalities, but about legality. This is one of the main rasons why i support paul.
dawzon 1 year ago
@dawzon Actually, politicians should be irrelevant. No politician has ever given people freedom. Again, they only allow people to have freedom after the people demand it. And what makes you think RP would be so easy to permit people to have freedom? This guy wants to set the USA back to 1800. There is a reason why the US is no longer a laissez fair capitalist country. All of the major struggles have been AGAINST LFC and the oppression that goes with it.
juliaisafilmbuff123 1 year ago
As well, the US constitution is hardly about protecting liberties. Look up Michael Parenti's "Myth of the FoundingFathers" speech. The constitution was written to protect the private property and wealth of the ultra-rich minority from the demands of the majority poor. Hardly "freedom"!
juliaisafilmbuff123 1 year ago
@juliaisafilmbuff123 I certainly don`t trust politicians, but what would you suggest as an alternative. I propose following the rule of law in order to constrain government power and to place more resposibility in the hands of citizens. (I think we may agree to some extent.) Except. Capitalism has created the freeest most, prosperous society in the history of civilization...socialism has always preyed off the ingenuity of capitalists and has always failed as a result.
dawzon 1 year ago
@dawzon Read Michael Albert's "Parecon" if you want an alternative. Look at the Paris Commune or anarchist Catalonia.
"Capitalism has created the freeest most, prosperous society in the history of civilization..."
Define "freest". Is the chaining of a 12-year old girl to a desk to make shoes for Nike part of "freedom"? There was laissez fair capitalism in the US many years ago and the result was mass poverty. It was only when workers began unionizing that living standards increased.
juliaisafilmbuff123 1 year ago
@juliaisafilmbuff123 I`ve never read thses and I will take a look. Chaining people up is against the law in America...while foriegn labour is a big problem, I hardly think that this is the result of America`s system but rather that lack of any rule of law in forign countries...who are taken advantage of by terrible people. Mass poverty in the united states is negligible when compared to the rest of the world.
dawzon 1 year ago
@dawzon Most third-world leaders are bought off by American companies. Yes, it is the capitalist system. Socialist countries don't sell their people out to American businesses.
Mass poverty in the US is something we should be looking at. I live in New Hampshire (the most "free market" state). In our major cities (Nashua and Manchester) there is third-world-like poverty due to lack of welfare and a minimum wage of 7 bucks an hour (lower than most states). Tell me if that's "freedom".
juliaisafilmbuff123 1 year ago
@juliaisafilmbuff123 that is not to say that there are not many problems with capitalism as well, but that in the short expiriment of freedom that is america, it has been immensely sucessful relative to other forms of government.
dawzon 1 year ago
@dawzon Define "successful". The USSR was successful in raising living standards in less than a generation. Mao's China was successful in bringing rights to women and caring for the poor and sick (i.e. barefoot doctors). The US government only feared Soviet-style marxism because it was the model for the third world to go through quick modernization in less than a generation.
juliaisafilmbuff123 1 year ago
Racecard, gotta love it. The mainstream politicians ruin the nation by overspending, taking you to needless wars and keeping the fat cats happy, but as long as they are political correct and they say they care for the minorities, they are loved and reelected. Ron Paul has known whats wrong with the country since the 70 and how monitary, foreign and social policy needs to change to correct it. But no, you find these papers written and prefer ppl that scam millions and bomb thousands. Sheeep!
CortoMaltese86 1 year ago
@CortoMaltese86 So, we're sheep because we hate racism. Go find Hitler's grave and necro his corpse.
AkaiShizuku 1 year ago
@AkaiShizuku If you listen to his message you would realize its the most anti-racist one. The indivudualism where you are judge as an individual and where you have economic and social liberty, where you provide for yourself in other words, is the most anti racial policy. The whole collectivism where some are supposed to work for others and where ppl are forced into programs is what creats fractions and racism. And thats the policy the other politicians keep. They need racism and hate for votes.
CortoMaltese86 1 year ago
@CortoMaltese86 People are not "forced" into collectivist programs. People lived in collectivist societies in harmony for centuries. It was only when people began hoarding resources and developed private property that things went to hell. Racism is a result of the system. Capitalists use racism as a way to divide and conquer the people to prevent people from organizing against the system. Likewise, monarchies also used racism for this purpose.
juliaisafilmbuff123 1 year ago
@juliaisafilmbuff123 Eh, ppl are forced into social security, which is a ponzi scheme a la Madoff, and also to pay for unemployment benefits etc. And youre confusing capitalism with corporatism which you have in usa today and which obama (and bush) are a part of.
As for collective societys, noone forced ppl to it like today. They did it of free will cause they gained by it. Im not against collectivism or organisations, just as long as noone is forced to anything. That way you get good ones.
CortoMaltese86 1 year ago
@AkaiShizuku I dont defend the content in these newsletters but they contradict everything else he's said and the consequenses of the libertarian philosophy. Dont judge him only by this and look at the enourmous crimes comitted by this administration and the ones before it.
CortoMaltese86 1 year ago
It's too bad you had to water it down because of the Randtards and Ron Paul fanboys. Good video, anyway.
AkaiShizuku 1 year ago
@AkaiShizuku Water it down? the whole peice was built on assumptions. this is an old debate which, was dealt with about a decade ago and is only brought up for political reasons today. Ron paul has never written anything even remotely similar to that kind of language, which he has denounced time and time again.Can you read minds?If you have done any research into Paul you would realize that this is so far from his perspective, or the manner and subject matter of which he writes and speaks.
dawzon 1 year ago
@dawzon Ron Paul is a politician of the rich. Therefore, he lies. No offense, but it kind of makes you look like a tool when you actually believe what politicians say. Not only is Ron Paul closely associated with various KKK members and neo-Nazis (Stormfront openly supports Ron Paul, this is not news), but you've obviously never heard of the Ron Paul Political Report, which contains various blatantly racist quotes from the douche himself.
AkaiShizuku 1 year ago
@AkaiShizuku the regrettable support paul get from such groups are because paul believes in freedom to an extent that would be to thier benefit in terms of freedom of speech. This is a far cry from supporting racism as an ideology. I have heard of the report...it was written by a disgruntled employee without his knowledge. If you listen to what RP has to say, the way he speaks and the content of his ideas, it is the exact opposite of such thinking.
dawzon 1 year ago
@dawzon *facepalm*
That doesn't answer Ron Paul's association with neo-Nazis and the KKK. It also doesn't answer the Ron Paul Political Report itself. The bottom line is that Ron Paul says one thing in private and then another in public. What Ron Paul says in private is homophobic, racist, and extremely bigoted. In addition, it's interesting how you talk about freedom of speech when hundreds of Rand/Paultards false flag MRN's channel.
AkaiShizuku 1 year ago
@AkaiShizuku Ron paul does not associate himself with racist groups. he accepts votes from anybody because he believes in freedom of thought. you are trying to confound a very important distinction. You assume to know what Paul thinks in private...this is a weak position imo. Everything I have ever seen from the man has been in support of freedom for individuals(and a concurrent distaste for group affiliations)I agree, it is lame to `false flag"...but u seem to confuse this somehow with paul
dawzon 1 year ago
@dawzon You really, really don't seem to know what you're talking about. At all. See the following two videos.
watch?v=t4P87p-Arcw
watch?v=zCSZRuS2YfU
AkaiShizuku 1 year ago
@AkaiShizuku Again, you proport to know what he thinks. I don`t believe that ron paul is racist based on everything that I have heard him say or write. not based on what other people have written in his name..which he has denounced many times. The media did not even follow up with this story because it had already been resolved back then. The writer was a rouge employee. Paul should have read his news letters, to be sure...but this is simply antithetical to the ideas which he supports.
dawzon 1 year ago
@dawzon Watch the videos already, FFS.....
AkaiShizuku 1 year ago
@AkaiShizuku
I found a video of Ron Paul, the moonbat, talking down on Black folks he can't deny this video. /watch?v=qy6PWNNrRT8
chewbaca1989 1 year ago
why would you call yourself Maoist rebel? he was a butcher.
Paul is not a racist and your supposed proof would never hold up in court. this debate is tiresome...it was put to rest about a decade ago. he never speaks of anything resembling racist ideology and doesn't support that type of thinking. Libertarianism in itself rejects the notion of thinking about people according to race, culture or beliefs... but focuses on maximizing freedom for the individual. Paul is a staunch libertarian.
dawzon 1 year ago
@dawzon Paul stamped his name on those documents, so yes he is responsible for them.
juliaisafilmbuff123 1 year ago
@juliaisafilmbuff123 It is true that paul should be responsible for overseeing the contents of the newsletters. I think anyone would awknowledge that, as paul has himself (many times ad nauseum). it was a disgruntled employee.That fact does not make paul a racist. his constituants continue to vote for him because paul has never used such language, which is so obviously written by someone else..language which he denounced and has never even remotely reflected in his writings or speeches.
dawzon 1 year ago
@dawzon So what if he later "denounced" it? RP needs to take responsibility and his fanatical supporters who would defend him no matter what need to stop putting all their faith in a politician whose job is to serve the status quo.
juliaisafilmbuff123 1 year ago
@juliaisafilmbuff123 It matters because the issue is whether he is racist or not, which is an easy label to throw around(but is not true in this case.) You think RP represents the status quo? I've never heard that before. Maybe you should research the man b4 you comment (I don't mean this as an insult.) RP is very much an outsider in most circles in washington circles....Paul is more closely aligned with politicians of the past who believed in free markets, constitutional historicism, ect.
dawzon 1 year ago
@dawzon The only reason RP is in power in the first place is because he supports the status quo, not because he's rebelling against it. Being labeled an "outsider" because you call for an extreme amount of de-regulation for industry and a weaker federal government doesn't mean shit. RP is part of the elite social system known as US politics. The people who support him believe change comes from politicians, which it does not. All the freedoms you enjoy you have because of people's struggles.
juliaisafilmbuff123 1 year ago
why would you call yourself Maoist rebel? he was a butcher.
Paul is not a racist and your supposed proof would never hold up in court. this debate is tiresome...it was put to rest about a decade ago. he never speaks of anything resembling racist ideology and doesn't support that type of thinking. Libertarianism in itself rejects the notion of thinking about people according to race, culture or beliefs... but focuses on maximizing freedom for the individual. Paul is a staunch libertarian.
dawzon 1 year ago
Links to proof please?
Or at least tell us where we can find them written.
KurzLuppii 1 year ago
god i hate ron paul.
dollsnatch 1 year ago
"The blacks talk about... how the whites have a conspiracy to wipe them out," Paul says.
Well, that's because, back in the day, they kind of did.
Or just use them for cheap labour, whatever worked out.
TheCanadianLeninist 1 year ago
I remember the Ron Paul fans a few years ago - but the more I read into Ron Paul the more confused I got regarding how people could honestly take him seriously. People so desperately want a messiah that they're willing to overlook a laundry list of flaws just to achieve it. I find it more confusing that Ron Paul reads Ayn Rand books yet ignores the massive chapter in 'Virtue of Selfishness' which calls racism the lowest and most primitive form of collectivist mindset.
kawaiigardiner 1 year ago
@kawaiigardiner Ayn Rand was openly racist. She said the indigenous peoples of the Americans "deserved" to be slaughtered by Europeans because their culture was "inferior". She said the same of the Palestinians being slaughtered by Israel. To say she wasn't racist is a joke and that passage from her book is more like a strawman of collectivism than anything else.
juliaisafilmbuff123 1 year ago
@juliaisafilmbuff123 I read her argument and I'd say that it is an argument of 'might makes right' rather than racism - racism would be linking race to be inherently inferior where as her statement was simply that 'we are more advanced than those people' with no statement of race. Interesting enough she does rally against collectivism and yet quite happy to be a flag waving ardent supporter of the United States - isn't patriotism and nationalism just other forms collectivism?
kawaiigardiner 1 year ago
@juliaisafilmbuff123 She ignores one brand of collectivism and praises another when it suits her interests; she talks about freedom of speech on one hand and then appears at the 'committee for unamerican activities' to name and shame 'known communists'. Then there are her quirks; good lord, if you have a beard you are apparently hiding something, if you're gay then you're immoral (her evidence, "oh, its self evident"). She is an example of a irrational person parading as a rational one.
kawaiigardiner 1 year ago
@kawaiigardiner Oh okay. Wouldn't doubt it.
juliaisafilmbuff123 1 year ago