Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (4)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!

  • Why does New Scientist write a DELIBERATELY provocative title on their cover "Darwin was wrong", and then expect and warn against creationists ripping words out of context and falsely claiming that biologists have given up on the theory of evolution? Huh? Pretty stupid editing. Sorry.

    Why can't they have titled it: "Building on Darwin" or something?

    mphello 5 months ago

  • I sure hope you awarded this DI spokesman the Fucktard of the Year Award.

    mphello 5 months ago

  • The problem is that in science nothing challenges evolution. The 'intelligent design' proponents state that there has to be an intelligent designer because of the complexity of life on earth. Nothing could be further from the truth! Intelligent design has a pre-existing designer, from where did the designer come? For nothing existed before the start of the universe. Who created the designer? This is a special pleadings argument. If nothing existed, then nothing existed.

    journeyer58 1 year ago

  • Excellent video

    faustolg 2 years ago

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more