33-Science and the Bible

[kensterfg]

God isn't real, just a man made thought.

[CreationMinistries]

@kensterfg this is your BELIEF. I understand that you are on MY site to defend your BELIEF but Darwinism is a manmade religious belief masquerading as scienc, and undermining both science and education. There is no viable proof Darwinismt ever took place because - it never took place

[TheScienceFoundation]

@CreationMinistries No, it's a lack of belief in god because exactly zero empirical data has ever been given.

'There is no viable proof Darwinismt ever took place'

Give a single testable mechanism which explains the hierarchy of ERV's other than common descent.

When you can't, when you have to censor this comment yet again, accept then dodge completely, or just reassert your same blatant lie of '14 ERV's' maybe then you can at least start realizing your position is untenable.

[CreationMinistries]

@TheScienceFoundation Not responding to your endless posts is not doging them. Like Darwinists "junk DNA' which is only now being discovered to hold the key to the RNA/DNA system (after 50 yeras!) ERV's will turn out to be of key importance in the complex genetic information system (which you actually think came about by accident?! -mind boggling!). Just because science doesn't understand ERV's yet doesn't mean it lends any hope for desperate Darwinists

[TheScienceFoundation]

@CreationMinistries Blocking my comments is however dodging, which is what you do most of the time. ERV's potentially serving function has nothing to do with how they're used to determine common ancestry.

/watch?v=fvF4q88YODU

/watch?v=I8kDzftu2w4

[CreationMinistries]

@TheScienceFoundation I post all of your comments that are worth a person's time to read. And how Darwinists misinterpret ERV's to try and support the scinetific impossibility of common descent from a bacteria to a giraffe or anything else has nothing to do with reality. Just like the oher 2,000 former claims of Darwinian proofs, once real science understands ERV's the will join the list....let's get back to how life started....you never have explained that have you. (-:

[gregrutz]

a land mammal changes into a whale? that's a fairy tale.

-Ambulocetus

-Dalanistes

-Rodhocetus

-Takracetus

-Gaviocetus

-Dorudon

-Basilosaurus

-Modern whale

They have found all the intermediate fossils and you still deny the facts.

[CreationMinistries]

@gregrutz his is a fairy tale and should be taken from "science' books.

[gregrutz]

Same KIND? Yes!

Dogs make dogs.

Apes make apes.

That is why humans are still apes.

And all apes are still monkeys.

And all monkeys are still primates.

And all primates are still mammals.

And all mammals are still tetrapods

[gregrutz]

Is that why he says there are many kinds of evolution, to place dought in peoples minds?

[CreationMinistries]

@gregrutz There's comic; geological; chemical, organic; and more. Then there are varying levels. We see micro adaptaions/variations but Darwinian style where a land mammal changes into a whale? hat's a fairy tale.

[hugesinker]

Do you recognize the fact that you need to posit your own theory of evolution that occurred after a woldwide flood killed everything but the contents of a tiny boat? However, your version of evolution says that the overwhelming majority of life's current diversity occurred over merely a dozen or fewer generations-- much more quickly than modern genetics tell us is even possible and with no substantiating evidence for such a high rate of adaptation. Does that sink in?

[CreationMinistries]

@hugesinker actually many examples exist of rapid variation within the same kinds of plants or animals leading to a variety of species...even your Punctuated Equilibrium is based on this. Yes, I believe all of today's dogs came from 2 dogs that were on Noah's Ark. You think all of today's dogs came from a rock. Does that sink in?

[hugesinker]

@CreationMinistries Punctuated equilibrium and cladogenesis is necessarily rare in comparison to gradualism. Also, a post-flood world would have most current natural ecosystems completely destroyed-- there wouldn't be significant adaptive pressure from some of them in a thousand years or more. Dogs "coming from a rock" does not sink in, because it's a gross oversimplification. The most popular current understanding is that primitive life arose from the chemistry surrounding deep ocean vents.

[CreationMinistries]

@hugesinker es, I do make things simple to see which of course Darwinian faithful dislike. Darwinists have no clue how life could've begun on its own and the 3 top hopes are: Super heated ocean vents; Super freezing ice chamber; or aliens dropped us off.

In other words, they have no clue how the complexity of life began on its own.

[hugesinker]

@CreationMinistries I believe that deep sea chemistry is currently accepted as the most plausible origin. Modern experiments have been able to create organic compounds under similar conditions. I would consider that a clue. But even if we had no clue, I don't see how you could exploit this without some demonstration of a magical spontaneous-generation of complex life. If you cannot, then admitting to a mystery just becomes the more honest position.

[CreationMinistries]

@hugesinker Yes, you "believe." Stop teaching your "belief" as if it were science.

[TheScienceFoundation]

@CreationMinistries You're aware that genetics completely contradicts the notion of populations being dwindled down as such, yes? That there is such a thing as genetic variation. You still have yet to give a source for anyone who understands evolution claiming anything evolved from a rock.

[CreationMinistries]

@TheScienceFoundation Let's see, nothing blew up and eventually a big rock (earth) formed. At this point there was no life so you tell me where life came from.

[xander55577]

thank you for posting. This is a great example of how people can misunderstand science, and this video will help me correct mis-interpretations and mis-conceptions about evolution. The faults of this speaker are a marvelous example of a lack of scientific literacy. please keep it up!!

[CreationMinistries]

@xander55577 ...LOL

[9pt9]

Great job Russ.

[CreationMinistries]

Thanks 9.9

[CreationMinistries]

I say you have no viable evidence of Darwinism having taken place. If you are correct all you need to do is to provide one viable example. Give us you very best shot and I will respond to it

[Raherin]

Why are creationists working so hard to disprove Evolution? They should be trying to explain why their story makes more sense then Evolution. Why would there ever be an instance a scientist would say "Hm, I can't explain this, it MUST be (the Christian) God!!!!!!" You will never see that in a scientific paper. Why on Earth is the creationists version a better explanation of the diversity of life on earth than Evolution? Why would God make Vestigial organs? Sloppiness? Rushing things?

[CreationMinistries]

Vestigial organs? Darwinists used to claim we had about 200 such leftovers but real science has shown every one has a purpose. Darwinists often say, "Hm, I can't explain this, but given MILLIONS OF YEARS... It doesn't take much to shoot holes in Darwinism. You may own the schools and media but the truth is on the side of the creationist

[Raherin]

You still haven't told me why creationists have a better explanation for the diversity of life on earth than Evolution. How does Creationists explain vestigials. How do they explain why the ark happened to drop off the animals in the exact way the tectonic plates would have split them up. Why would god creation everything so sloppily? Just because they have a use now, doesn't mean they are not vestigial. You should look up the definition.

[N3CR1S]

@CreationMinistries

so you answered non of his questions and then concludede you were right?

OR

if those were your actual answers then your conclusions is wrong since the answer/premis is wrong.

I wont be replying more since you are clearly not worth the time.

Have a good day.

[CreationMinistries]

@N3CR1S Good to see you finally figured out that responding to some of your friends is "clearly not worth my time."

And gee, I am certainly going to miss hearing from you. (-:

[TheScienceFoundation]

@CreationMinistries So you consider supporting your position with actual data as not being worth your time?

[CreationMinistries]

@TheScienceFoundation - No. I'm saying answering questions from people who are not interested in the truth is not worth my time

[CreationMinistries]

@TheScienceFoundation - No. I'm saying answering questions from people who are not interested in the truth is not worth my time

[PunchDubDays]

So you're saying that producing evidence for your claims isn't worth your time?

[CreationMinistries]

@PunchDubDays - No. I'm saying answering questions from people who are not interested in the truth is not worth my time

[TheScienceFoundation]

Since you're trying to make your religion a science, what could potentially falsify the idea that an invisible intangible untestable being is responsible for everything, no matter what?

[CreationMinistries]

You mean as opposed to how invisible untestable millions and millions of years is responsible for everything?

LOL

[CreationistCrap]

No, as opposed to testable mechanisms such as descent with modification and empirical evidence such as ERV's

[TheScienceFoundation]

No, as opposed to descent with modification.

[CreationMinistries]

Kinds bringing forth after their kind,what you describe as descent with modification, is 100% Biblically and scientifically accurate. These are caused by the sorting or the loss of the parents genetic data - Gene Depletion - not by the never-observed gain of new & beneficial genetic data which the never-observed religious belief of Darwinism requires. Claiming ERVs are proof for Darwinism only reveals your desparate position

[warloxintubesox]

Do you even know what genetic information is? I'd like to hear what your definition is. You've completely butchered genetics. If you knew the first thing about it, you'd understand that gene depletion is simply a mutation. Not all mutations are beneficial.

[CreationMinistries]

Gene depletion is not a mutation. It is a principle that all adaptations or mutations result from the sorting or loss of genetic data See our vidoes #6 - #14 on Darwinian frauds & genetics (regarding creation-Darwinian evolution issues) "Not all mutations are beneficial"...? Rarely does a mutation impart a benefit....many more are fatal & never does a mutation result in the addition of new & beneficial genetic information being added to a gene pool as Neo-Darwinists falsely suggest

[TheScienceFoundation]

"Now deify yourself" Wait, until now you've said 'evolution says you're just rain on a rock' so which is it, does evolution say we're gods or rain on a rock?

[CreationMinistries]

I never said any such thing. You are misleading folks as usual Naturalism based on the belief of Darwinism, based on faith in 'millions of years' teaches that nothing blew up, a big rock formed, it rained on the rock & life spontaneously generated & turned into everything that has ever lived...without leaving any viable evidence of any of this! Darwinism teaches you are the most evolved, survival of the fittest - Stalin, Hitler & Mao each loved Darwin

[TheScienceFoundation]

Which part are you denying? That you said 'evolution says you're rain on a rock'? because you just said that in this very comment

Or that you said 'evolution says you're a god'? Because you just said that in this video.

[CreationMinistries]

Perhaps a Q-Tip would help you.

I never said: 'evolution says you're rain on a rock' or 'evolution says you're a god'

[TheScienceFoundation]

I'm pretty sure there was something in the bible about not lying.

[CreationMinistries]

Glad to see you got something right.  Keep watching our videos. They are rubbing off on you

[TheScienceFoundation]

You could at least admit you're too cowardly to respond to my questions, this little troll game of yours is quite sad.

[CreationMinistries]

Not responding to your petty questions does not make me a coward. I am just too busy reaching people who are honestly seeking the truth to spend time responding to your never-ending and rarely-meaningful inquiries.

[TheScienceFoundation]

Petty question? It was a matter of you flat out lying about something you said in the very video we're commenting on.

2:47 - 2:53 "And now deify yourself... you are your own god"

Are you really denying that that line is in this very video?

[CreationistCrap]

wait, you're REALLY denying that you said those things, while having videos up in which you say them?

[CreationMinistries]

Nowhere do I make the statements that:

a)'evolution says you're just rain on a rock'

b] 'evolution says we're gods'

Give me a time mark where you think I said this. Good luck and enjoy the videos

[cathy356]

Is that all you got...petty, silly questions? Where's the ape brain that evolution gave you? You could at least use IT.