If you are heads up you got to try pinpoint your opponent to a play style and play the opposite of what he is playing. If your opponent plays LAG, then you should play TAG and vice versa. This is a profitable play.
This chart she is showing is for cashgames only. If you are a tournament player you cant win by playing TAG the whole tournament. You got to play LAG when the ante and blind structure hits your stack hard.
If you ask me, a mixture of TAG and LAG playing tends to work best. Both are aggressive styles, so they both have that much in common. How you shift between the two depends on your image, your opponents, and of course your hands.
i play all of it so people cant read what u doing. like, bluff alout so people think your a bluffer and thin they go all in but im not bluffing this time lol. thin change it up stop bluffing. people will go crazy trying to read you. you can make more money this way.
For me, I play like rock but once I win enough, or won decent amount, I start doing what this video describes as "winner". But this doesn't guarantee anything. I've seen people like Phil Ivey who is loose and very aggressive and he wins in a long run than losing. Not only Phil Ivey but people like Stu Ungar, and other aggressive players with junk cards. They win MILLIONS. Then there are people like Gavin Smith, Daniel Negreanu, etc who usually calls or checks to see potential sets.
I know. Phil Ivey is master of the game. His style is very unpredictable. I placed him under loose-aggressive bcz he plays with many weird hands and bluffs a LOT and is very aggressive. Phil is in his own level.
I think I am more of a rock because I hate taking risks. Some of the people I play at casinos seem to try looking big by bluffing alot, but I find a way to screw them over and win a good amount of money.
I'm a rock myself and I win lot more than I lose. But this video only works if you have won enough and you keep playing. For example, A 8. If I only have 20 bucks and everyone has lot more than me, I fold it pre-flop, but if I have nearly 80-100 bucks in that table bcz i won a lot, then I would call or raise, kick some people off, and play as best as possible.
If I win a lot, I limp in with junk hands too because of implied odds. For example, if it only costs minimum blind to see the flop, i'm in dealer button position, and I have 2 7 and I have so much money, I would limp in with 2 7. If I do hit something really good with 2 7, I can make lot more off it.
There is a big difference between a LAG and a Maniac...
WannaBeBalla1 1 year ago
Being TAG doesn't mean you will be a winner ...
Schaalvoordelen 1 year ago
"the winner"... is this video serious?
Shinigale 1 year ago
If you are heads up you got to try pinpoint your opponent to a play style and play the opposite of what he is playing. If your opponent plays LAG, then you should play TAG and vice versa. This is a profitable play.
redantidote 1 year ago
This chart she is showing is for cashgames only. If you are a tournament player you cant win by playing TAG the whole tournament. You got to play LAG when the ante and blind structure hits your stack hard.
redantidote 1 year ago
lol if we played a giant game of poker right now I would be the maniac
ACDCjr123 1 year ago
If you ask me, a mixture of TAG and LAG playing tends to work best. Both are aggressive styles, so they both have that much in common. How you shift between the two depends on your image, your opponents, and of course your hands.
JWReichert 2 years ago 5
i play all of it so people cant read what u doing. like, bluff alout so people think your a bluffer and thin they go all in but im not bluffing this time lol. thin change it up stop bluffing. people will go crazy trying to read you. you can make more money this way.
nategrier2003 3 years ago
Comment removed
EdDy4RheelZ 3 years ago
For me, I play like rock but once I win enough, or won decent amount, I start doing what this video describes as "winner". But this doesn't guarantee anything. I've seen people like Phil Ivey who is loose and very aggressive and he wins in a long run than losing. Not only Phil Ivey but people like Stu Ungar, and other aggressive players with junk cards. They win MILLIONS. Then there are people like Gavin Smith, Daniel Negreanu, etc who usually calls or checks to see potential sets.
EdDy4RheelZ 3 years ago
hey mate. you are talking about phil ivey. not just a random "loose and very aggressive" player. he is a master of the game.
najdorf 3 years ago
I know. Phil Ivey is master of the game. His style is very unpredictable. I placed him under loose-aggressive bcz he plays with many weird hands and bluffs a LOT and is very aggressive. Phil is in his own level.
EdDy4RheelZ 3 years ago
Comment removed
EdDy4RheelZ 3 years ago
I think I am more of a rock because I hate taking risks. Some of the people I play at casinos seem to try looking big by bluffing alot, but I find a way to screw them over and win a good amount of money.
JetHawk 3 years ago
I'm a rock myself and I win lot more than I lose. But this video only works if you have won enough and you keep playing. For example, A 8. If I only have 20 bucks and everyone has lot more than me, I fold it pre-flop, but if I have nearly 80-100 bucks in that table bcz i won a lot, then I would call or raise, kick some people off, and play as best as possible.
EdDy4RheelZ 3 years ago
If I win a lot, I limp in with junk hands too because of implied odds. For example, if it only costs minimum blind to see the flop, i'm in dealer button position, and I have 2 7 and I have so much money, I would limp in with 2 7. If I do hit something really good with 2 7, I can make lot more off it.
EdDy4RheelZ 3 years ago
still...very nice...informative vids.......
ChipChatPoker 3 years ago
hey 007 your a cyber tap
pokervlog 3 years ago
"The Winner" is just wrong. This is an oversimplification
mvogt 4 years ago 4