Well another rich liberal hypocrite gives a blow job to Big Nurse Hillary. I could name a list of actors and musicians who would like the working proletariat to monitored and controlled by greasy little worms with big egos: teachers, bureaucrats, artists, academics and trade union leaders.
Hillary = Nurse Ratched (Just look at that UGLY face? America, do we want to see THAT for the next 4 years?!!) - & Jack has flown over the cuckoos nest to be endorsing her!!
This is rich coming from people who put a warmonger with the I.Q. of a baboon in power not once but twice! You could do and have done a lot worse! She's bright, empathetic, female (which is a huge plus) and has 8 years of personal experience in the Whitehouse. She is the intelligent choice but unfortunately the American voter seems to want a president that 'they could share a beer with' rather than one well versed in foreign policy, social welfare and economics.Please use your brains this time
Bradford Delong, clinton administration veteran and Berkeley economist warns the voters:
"My 2 cents' worth and I think it is the 2 cents' worth of everybody who worked for the Clinton Administration health care reform effort of 1993-1994 is that Hillary Rodham Clinton needs to be kept very far away from the White House for the rest of her life. Heading up health-care reform was the only major administrative job she has ever tried to do + she was a complete flop at it."
"She had neither the grasp of policy substance, the managerial skills, nor the political smarts to do the job she was then given. And she wasn't smart enough to realize that she was in over her head and had to get out of the Health Care Czar role quickly. There is no reason to think she would be anything but an abysmal president."
Also note that this self-described brilliant woman flunked the DC Bar, which had a 67% pass rate. (See the Bernstein book on this. Indeed, see her own turgid tome. (Not the audio version, however. Perhaps the clinton-machine thinking is that literacy and gullibility are inversely related.)) She did, however, pass the Arkansas Bar, (80-90% pass rate) and the rest is history, albeit revisionist.
In fairness, she did succeed at a couple of things:
She managed to lose Congress for the Democrats for the first time in 40 years and it was her brilliant tactic, not to settle with Paula Jones, that got her husband impeached.
And talking about her husband, anything that could be remotely construed as an achievement by her is, in fact, derivative--which is the very antithesis of the feminist ideal. She is a fake, a fraud.
LMAO Not to attack you personally, but honestly... This post of yours tells me all there is to know about you. At a minimum, both Clinton and Kerry know how to pronounce the word "nuclear." It's sad that Bush lowered the bar so far down, that that seems like a legitimate qualification!
"Clinton and Kerry know how to pronounce the word 'nuclear.'"
Unfortunately, the clintons also knew how to proliferate 'nuclear.'
"For more than a half decade, the Clinton administration was shoveling atomic secrets out the door as fast as it could, literally by the ton. Millions of previously classified ideas and documents relating to nuclear arms were released to all comers, including China's bomb makers."
What da hell is a NICHOLSON FAG? Jack can buy and sell your uninteligent, talent-free ass! I have always been a fan of Jack Nichlson, and I would be proud to have Hillary Clinton as my President (with or without anyone's endorsement). There are at least as many Americans who would be proud of Hillary as are ashamed of Dubya.
"We need to know who this woman is.... There's not a sex act mentioned in the book."
The very fact that this caveat is used to encourage people to research anti-Hillary information speaks volumes about the people promoting it. Their sexual obsession with the Clintons has burned and discredited them in the past; now they have a not-so-different tact that they'd have us believe is more valid. Nice try, but no sale.
Secondly, that's the quote of liberal Democrat, Carl Bernstein (of Woodward and Bernstein fame). It is a conclusion he reached after doing years of research for his new biography on the defective.
He is warning voters ignorant enough to vote for hillary clinton. You ought to listen. If not for yourself, for your kids.
Putting doctrinal purity ahead of making sure a defective and dangerous clinton never again controls this country is pre-clinton thinking.
We no longer have the luxury of time or circumstance to massage our sensibilities, to indulge our indignations. We will not survive another clinton. (Indeed, we may yet not survive the first.)
Who are you kidding? We not only survived the "first Clinton", but thrived under his stewardship. I doubt the "second Clinton" could be as successful given the enormous damage to the country that Bush The Lesser has wrought. She wouldn't be my first choice for President, but I'll take her over McCain or any of the other Republican candidates who took a shot at becoming the nominee.
As far as Clinton "abusing women", you conveniently forget Ken Starr's treatment of Susan McDougal.
(continued) You also conveniently forget that Paula Jones' original accusation was dubious at best, and called into question by her own family. On the night Clinton supposedly exposed himself, she mentioned nothing about it to them; in fact, they said she was excited to have met him.
And Monica Lewinsky, who was irrelevant to the Paula Jones fiasco in the first place (thus disproving any contention that "it wasn't about sex"), was obviously a willing participant.
Notwithstanding the spuriousness of the following argument, that clinton's perjuries were "just about sex" and therefore "do not rise to the level of an impeachable offense," (i.e., the courts make no distinction between perjuries), clinton's perjury was not "just about sex."
clinton's perjury was about clinton denying a citizen justice by lying in a civil rights-sexual harassment case about his sexual history with subordinates.
That said, focus on Juanita Broaddrick and the clintons. The husband raped Broaddrick. And the missus threatened Broaddrick 2 weeks later.
"It's important to know who this woman is.... There's not a sex act mentioned in the book. What is important is Hillary savaging the women." (Carl Bernstein)
"What kind of people are the clintons?" (Bob Herbert, The New York Times, 01.26.08)
Thrived? Check out the C-SPAN poll of 95 historians and presidential scholars.
Under the clintons, terrorism was in its incipient stage and stoppable and for reasons of self-interest, the clintons ignored it.
Bush inherited a political powder keg.
As this campaign has so clearly demonstrated, the clintons will always do what is best for the clintons and to hell with the party, the country, the world.
Miatt111: Yes, thrived. Economically, technologically, and in other ways. Under BILL Clinton, terrorists responsible for the first WTC attack were captured, put on trial, and jailed for life- denied "martyrdom." Many more plots were stopped. He came closer to killing Osama bin Laden via black ops than Dubya ever has with overt military action. Unlike Bush, he was never baited into making bin Laden more sympathetic to potential followers.
(cont.) He "ignored" terrorism? Funny, I distinctly remember him talking about it a lot, including proposing more military spending to combat it, in his last SOTU. I also remember lots of talk from the Republican congress that he was only "wagging the dog" and overstating the danger. If 95 scholars and historians rated Clinton badly (which I doubt, but show me if you can), then by their standards, Bush deserves no less than the same treatment Mussolini got at the end of WWII.
Even after being questioned by the chief usher at the White House who believed the furniture belonged to the mansion, not the Clintons personally, Bill and Hillary Clinton began shipping furniture from the White House to their New Castle (Chappaqua), New York home in January 2000, the Washington Post revealed in a front page story on Saturday. But the broadcast networks all ignored the disclosure on Saturday night after NBC gave it a sentence on Friday night.
Even after being questioned by the chief usher at the White House who believed the furniture belonged to the mansion, not the Clintons personally, Bill and Hillary Clinton began shipping furniture from the White House to their New Castle (Chappaqua), New York home in January 2000, the Washington Post revealed in a front page story on Saturday. But the broadcast networks all ignored the disclosure on Saturday night after NBC gave it a sentence on Friday night.
Wow, not only are we possibly going to nominate an empty suit, it is one with ties to louis farrakhan. what are you thinking people? obama needs to stay in the senate and prove he is worthy of representing American voters, rather than preaching to us.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
wow, you gotta love american voters, not that long ago, they decided to elect a retarded, drunk, deserter, warmonger over an intellectual war hero (Kerry), and over a Nobel prize winner( Al Gore). Now, with the opportunity of bringing back the prosperity of the Clinton years, they lean towards an empty suit, with cute words who in the last 3 years nobody can name a single thing he has done for his constituents in Illinois. It's not time to change the president, it's time to change the voters.
Funny how Hillary is accepting the nomination of a chronic womanizer like Jack. Maybe he reminds her of Bill?
Hillary's small minded bitchiness & false allegations about Obama only show how desperate she is to counteract the rising tide of his popularity. Obama's popularity is based on voter respect, so she's shooting herself in the foot by doing this. She's also hurting the Democratic party. Makes sense a nasty curmudgeon like Jack Nicholson would support Hillary; they've got a lot in common.
lol, Just gotta say from an Aussie point of view: Jeez you Yanks take an opinion that will not even MATTER in 6 months, nothing will ever change over there, because you guys are too convinced of your self importance
PLEASE TAKE NOTE: Most of the world doesn't even CARE who your next President will be: Your still gonna be too far up your own butts to notice what we think anyway!!
actually you do, which makes you foreigners weak, because not only do we not care about your foreign leaders, but no American knows who they are. Though you are scared to death of our foreign leaders, know who they are, and deeply care for one simple reason: we got the bombs!
How sad that you think someone is evil simply because you disagree with her.
It takes real intelligence to be able to stand up for your views and beliefs while having the capacity to understand that it's not the only one available.
Don't you think that the retched treatment is like totally hot?
I mean, just look at the grooves on that face! Whoa. A woman like that could really teach you things, if you could just figure out what they were. Kidding, kidding. She's just too much babe . . .
Nurse Ratched's pernicious essence seems to have eluded your 'buff and confident' self.
The woman is at once a cold, sadistic tyrant and a metaphor for the corrupting influence of power, or more likely, for the survival of the "unfittest,"i.e., how defectives become our leaders.
Before you pull that lever, you might want to check out this: deletehillarydotcom/the_barrett_report
Like the Bush administration? I.E. "Either you're with us or you're with the terrorists" meaning "Don't question my authority or you're not patriotic"-basically a dictatorship, which Bush actually said he'd be fine with as long as he was the dictator.
Does "survival of the unfittest" mean that no one other than a white, heterosexual, Christian male should be able to lead?
I know all about Hillary Clinton.She's a better option than the joke we've currently got.
Critically important message: You have to be nuts to put those two back in power.
Powerful ending. We must heed Carl Bernstein's warning,intended, especially, for progressives like him: "We need to know who this woman is.... There's not a sex act mentioned in the book. What is important is Hillary savaging the women."
In other words, we must understand that this is the LAST woman who should become our first female president.
She is a chronic abuser of women in her own right. (And, as we learned after Iowa, she is--they are--despicable racists who would polarize and destroy the party and the country in order to retake the White House.)
"What kind of people are the Clintons?"
(Bob Herbert, The New York Times, January 26, 2008, Charleston, S.C.)
Is anyone aware of the criminal law suit trial that involves hillary and bill clinton? The suit was filed a couple of years ago by Peter Paul. The trial is set to begin this February 21. This month! go to hillcap site (org extention) for details. Tell everyone!
bizzare.
mattgarcia1 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Someone has released a copy of Hillary Clinton's bedtime prayer. Here it is:
"Now I lay me down to sleep;
I pray the Lord my soul to keep.
Keep me safe through all the drama -
Just let someone shoot Obama."
VanadiusRex 3 years ago
Hillary is true and blue. for the people!
obama= elitist
lcd2201 3 years ago
IT's TIME FOR THE FAT LADY TO SING!!!
LMAO
SHE HAD NO IDEA HER OLD MAN WAS RUNNING AROUND ON HER??????
Dan111555E 3 years ago
It's time for the Fat Ladt to Sing!!!
LMAO
Dan111555E 3 years ago
Go Hillary!
Knock 'em dead !
lcd2201 3 years ago
Hey, "icd2201" --you are only good at KILLING patients with vicodin and vioxx.
cadermd 3 years ago
Well another rich liberal hypocrite gives a blow job to Big Nurse Hillary. I could name a list of actors and musicians who would like the working proletariat to monitored and controlled by greasy little worms with big egos: teachers, bureaucrats, artists, academics and trade union leaders.
AlbertaAllan 3 years ago
Hillary = Nurse Ratched (Just look at that UGLY face? America, do we want to see THAT for the next 4 years?!!) - & Jack has flown over the cuckoos nest to be endorsing her!!
VacuumVideo 3 years ago
People..if you believe this video..you need to go outside breath some fresh air and live! You are being brainwashed.
izzy98027 3 years ago
This is rich coming from people who put a warmonger with the I.Q. of a baboon in power not once but twice! You could do and have done a lot worse! She's bright, empathetic, female (which is a huge plus) and has 8 years of personal experience in the Whitehouse. She is the intelligent choice but unfortunately the American voter seems to want a president that 'they could share a beer with' rather than one well versed in foreign policy, social welfare and economics.Please use your brains this time
sleepypoodle 4 years ago
1/5
I have news for you. hillary clinton's IQ, (like John Kerry's), is likely lower than Bush's.
hillary clinton is clearly inept, and as Patrick Healy of the NYT documents, the idea that she is 'experienced' is the fairy tale of this race.
miat1111 3 years ago
2/5
Bradford Delong, clinton administration veteran and Berkeley economist warns the voters:
"My 2 cents' worth and I think it is the 2 cents' worth of everybody who worked for the Clinton Administration health care reform effort of 1993-1994 is that Hillary Rodham Clinton needs to be kept very far away from the White House for the rest of her life. Heading up health-care reform was the only major administrative job she has ever tried to do + she was a complete flop at it."
miat1111 3 years ago
3/5
DeLong continues:
"She had neither the grasp of policy substance, the managerial skills, nor the political smarts to do the job she was then given. And she wasn't smart enough to realize that she was in over her head and had to get out of the Health Care Czar role quickly. There is no reason to think she would be anything but an abysmal president."
miat1111 3 years ago
4/5
Also note that this self-described brilliant woman flunked the DC Bar, which had a 67% pass rate. (See the Bernstein book on this. Indeed, see her own turgid tome. (Not the audio version, however. Perhaps the clinton-machine thinking is that literacy and gullibility are inversely related.)) She did, however, pass the Arkansas Bar, (80-90% pass rate) and the rest is history, albeit revisionist.
miat1111 3 years ago
5/5
In fairness, she did succeed at a couple of things:
She managed to lose Congress for the Democrats for the first time in 40 years and it was her brilliant tactic, not to settle with Paula Jones, that got her husband impeached.
And talking about her husband, anything that could be remotely construed as an achievement by her is, in fact, derivative--which is the very antithesis of the feminist ideal. She is a fake, a fraud.
miat1111 3 years ago
LMAO Not to attack you personally, but honestly... This post of yours tells me all there is to know about you. At a minimum, both Clinton and Kerry know how to pronounce the word "nuclear." It's sad that Bush lowered the bar so far down, that that seems like a legitimate qualification!
FuhQTube 3 years ago
"Clinton and Kerry know how to pronounce the word 'nuclear.'"
Unfortunately, the clintons also knew how to proliferate 'nuclear.'
"For more than a half decade, the Clinton administration was shoveling atomic secrets out the door as fast as it could, literally by the ton. Millions of previously classified ideas and documents relating to nuclear arms were released to all comers, including China's bomb makers."
Wm J Broad
Spying Isn't the Only Way to Learn About Nukes
The New York Times, 5.30.99
miat1111 3 years ago
What da hell is a NICHOLSON FAG? Jack can buy and sell your uninteligent, talent-free ass! I have always been a fan of Jack Nichlson, and I would be proud to have Hillary Clinton as my President (with or without anyone's endorsement). There are at least as many Americans who would be proud of Hillary as are ashamed of Dubya.
polkadotbox2 4 years ago
"We need to know who this woman is.... There's not a sex act mentioned in the book."
The very fact that this caveat is used to encourage people to research anti-Hillary information speaks volumes about the people promoting it. Their sexual obsession with the Clintons has burned and discredited them in the past; now they have a not-so-different tact that they'd have us believe is more valid. Nice try, but no sale.
FuhQTube 4 years ago
1/2
You miss the point.
First of all, that quote was proffered precisely to reject the sexual framing of the clintons' crimes.
The clintons would love us to define their crimes in sexual terms. In fact, they have, over the years, encouraged us to do precisely that.
But it is ABUSE, NOT SEX that defines the clinton crimes. Abuse of women. Abuse of power.
deletehillarydotcom/the_barrett_report
miat1111 3 years ago
2/2
Secondly, that's the quote of liberal Democrat, Carl Bernstein (of Woodward and Bernstein fame). It is a conclusion he reached after doing years of research for his new biography on the defective.
He is warning voters ignorant enough to vote for hillary clinton. You ought to listen. If not for yourself, for your kids.
miat1111 3 years ago
P.S.
Putting doctrinal purity ahead of making sure a defective and dangerous clinton never again controls this country is pre-clinton thinking.
We no longer have the luxury of time or circumstance to massage our sensibilities, to indulge our indignations. We will not survive another clinton. (Indeed, we may yet not survive the first.)
miat1111 3 years ago
Who are you kidding? We not only survived the "first Clinton", but thrived under his stewardship. I doubt the "second Clinton" could be as successful given the enormous damage to the country that Bush The Lesser has wrought. She wouldn't be my first choice for President, but I'll take her over McCain or any of the other Republican candidates who took a shot at becoming the nominee.
As far as Clinton "abusing women", you conveniently forget Ken Starr's treatment of Susan McDougal.
FuhQTube 3 years ago
(continued) You also conveniently forget that Paula Jones' original accusation was dubious at best, and called into question by her own family. On the night Clinton supposedly exposed himself, she mentioned nothing about it to them; in fact, they said she was excited to have met him.
And Monica Lewinsky, who was irrelevant to the Paula Jones fiasco in the first place (thus disproving any contention that "it wasn't about sex"), was obviously a willing participant.
FuhQTube 3 years ago
1/2
You miss the relevance of Paula Jones:
Notwithstanding the spuriousness of the following argument, that clinton's perjuries were "just about sex" and therefore "do not rise to the level of an impeachable offense," (i.e., the courts make no distinction between perjuries), clinton's perjury was not "just about sex."
clinton's perjury was about clinton denying a citizen justice by lying in a civil rights-sexual harassment case about his sexual history with subordinates.
miat1111 3 years ago
2/2
That said, focus on Juanita Broaddrick and the clintons. The husband raped Broaddrick. And the missus threatened Broaddrick 2 weeks later.
"It's important to know who this woman is.... There's not a sex act mentioned in the book. What is important is Hillary savaging the women." (Carl Bernstein)
"What kind of people are the clintons?" (Bob Herbert, The New York Times, 01.26.08)
miat1111 3 years ago
1/2
Thrived? Check out the C-SPAN poll of 95 historians and presidential scholars.
Under the clintons, terrorism was in its incipient stage and stoppable and for reasons of self-interest, the clintons ignored it.
Bush inherited a political powder keg.
As this campaign has so clearly demonstrated, the clintons will always do what is best for the clintons and to hell with the party, the country, the world.
miat1111 3 years ago
2/2
As for Susan McDougal, at best the 'abuse' was self-inflicted.
More likely tho, the clinton heavy hand was at work.
(Surely you must have noticed how many former clinton cohorts act against their own interest to keep the lovely couple out of the slammer.)
miat1111 3 years ago
Miatt111: Yes, thrived. Economically, technologically, and in other ways. Under BILL Clinton, terrorists responsible for the first WTC attack were captured, put on trial, and jailed for life- denied "martyrdom." Many more plots were stopped. He came closer to killing Osama bin Laden via black ops than Dubya ever has with overt military action. Unlike Bush, he was never baited into making bin Laden more sympathetic to potential followers.
FuhQTube 3 years ago
(cont.) He "ignored" terrorism? Funny, I distinctly remember him talking about it a lot, including proposing more military spending to combat it, in his last SOTU. I also remember lots of talk from the Republican congress that he was only "wagging the dog" and overstating the danger. If 95 scholars and historians rated Clinton badly (which I doubt, but show me if you can), then by their standards, Bush deserves no less than the same treatment Mussolini got at the end of WWII.
FuhQTube 3 years ago
Even after being questioned by the chief usher at the White House who believed the furniture belonged to the mansion, not the Clintons personally, Bill and Hillary Clinton began shipping furniture from the White House to their New Castle (Chappaqua), New York home in January 2000, the Washington Post revealed in a front page story on Saturday. But the broadcast networks all ignored the disclosure on Saturday night after NBC gave it a sentence on Friday night.
porthaul 4 years ago
And this petty poo poo should interest us WHY? What are your comments on the TRILLIONS wasted on a wag-the-dog "war" in Iraq?
thursdaysrecords 4 years ago
Even after being questioned by the chief usher at the White House who believed the furniture belonged to the mansion, not the Clintons personally, Bill and Hillary Clinton began shipping furniture from the White House to their New Castle (Chappaqua), New York home in January 2000, the Washington Post revealed in a front page story on Saturday. But the broadcast networks all ignored the disclosure on Saturday night after NBC gave it a sentence on Friday night.
MAD4MALAGATANI 4 years ago 2
if she wins, she and her family and friends will be the only ones to win...not USA.
anonymousbug 4 years ago 6
the Joker endorses the other Joker!
gallomex13 4 years ago 6
¥T
MISTAFIEDONEEIGHTSEV 4 years ago
Wow, not only are we possibly going to nominate an empty suit, it is one with ties to louis farrakhan. what are you thinking people? obama needs to stay in the senate and prove he is worthy of representing American voters, rather than preaching to us.
MsFoof 4 years ago
well done!!!
dddoggg 4 years ago
this is one of the worst videos i've seen,sorry i wasted my time on it
stringy44266 4 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
wow, you gotta love american voters, not that long ago, they decided to elect a retarded, drunk, deserter, warmonger over an intellectual war hero (Kerry), and over a Nobel prize winner( Al Gore). Now, with the opportunity of bringing back the prosperity of the Clinton years, they lean towards an empty suit, with cute words who in the last 3 years nobody can name a single thing he has done for his constituents in Illinois. It's not time to change the president, it's time to change the voters.
mgomez31 4 years ago
who cares a shit!!!!
jlcarlisle 4 years ago
Funny how Hillary is accepting the nomination of a chronic womanizer like Jack. Maybe he reminds her of Bill?
Hillary's small minded bitchiness & false allegations about Obama only show how desperate she is to counteract the rising tide of his popularity. Obama's popularity is based on voter respect, so she's shooting herself in the foot by doing this. She's also hurting the Democratic party. Makes sense a nasty curmudgeon like Jack Nicholson would support Hillary; they've got a lot in common.
ninunaia 4 years ago 4
lol crazy
justrelaxeye 4 years ago
lol, Just gotta say from an Aussie point of view: Jeez you Yanks take an opinion that will not even MATTER in 6 months, nothing will ever change over there, because you guys are too convinced of your self importance
PLEASE TAKE NOTE: Most of the world doesn't even CARE who your next President will be: Your still gonna be too far up your own butts to notice what we think anyway!!
Ferrigamo 4 years ago
actually you do, which makes you foreigners weak, because not only do we not care about your foreign leaders, but no American knows who they are. Though you are scared to death of our foreign leaders, know who they are, and deeply care for one simple reason: we got the bombs!
econojon 4 years ago
load of crap
scorpionkings 4 years ago 2
there's something wrong with the video. i think the clip got stuck or something. anyone hearing this?
bughunter801 4 years ago
I'll get you my pretty! And your little dog too!
badfender223 4 years ago
Hillary IS nurse Ratchet....
0BarefootMama 4 years ago
all those crazies are voting for clinton!
zardozman7 4 years ago
ick. what a mess this vid is.
characterwoman 4 years ago
How sad that you think someone is evil simply because you disagree with her.
It takes real intelligence to be able to stand up for your views and beliefs while having the capacity to understand that it's not the only one available.
Dorsiatic 4 years ago
Stupid and a waste of all our minds.
walkout 4 years ago
Don't you think that the retched treatment is like totally hot?
I mean, just look at the grooves on that face! Whoa. A woman like that could really teach you things, if you could just figure out what they were. Kidding, kidding. She's just too much babe . . .
3wsx6tgb9ik 4 years ago
Hand job Hill and Blow job Bill.. dumb fucks who need to go to france, a place where they belong. a place where the jokes of the world are!!!
MuddyMadman 4 years ago
stupid video
tvfilm 4 years ago 4
Even though I'm an Obama supporter, I can see why a lot of HIllary fans would get offended by this. It is a bit loud and obnoxious.
But with that said, the real Jack support video is pretty crappily made.
Obama's going to win, anyway.
fidesverita 4 years ago
LMAO
Dan111555E 4 years ago
I'd rather have a hard ass bitch running this country, then a second rate malcomx/mlk that didn't live in the 48 main until he was an adult.
joefalcon7 4 years ago
Finally the story has been told. This is the Real Clintons
Dan111555E 4 years ago
nurse ratched represents evil to any man who is not secure enough in his masculinity to take orders from a woman.
as does hillary clinton.
i'm a buff and confident dude, hence my ability to support hillary as the democratic candidate.
trikid2200 4 years ago
Nurse Ratched's pernicious essence seems to have eluded your 'buff and confident' self.
The woman is at once a cold, sadistic tyrant and a metaphor for the corrupting influence of power, or more likely, for the survival of the "unfittest,"i.e., how defectives become our leaders.
Before you pull that lever, you might want to check out this: deletehillarydotcom/the_barrett_report
miat1111 4 years ago
The BO supporters are really into the name-calling - that's all they're capable of, just like gradeschoolers.
Grow up, miat1111
barbschu 4 years ago 3
"Corrupting influence of power?"
Like the Bush administration? I.E. "Either you're with us or you're with the terrorists" meaning "Don't question my authority or you're not patriotic"-basically a dictatorship, which Bush actually said he'd be fine with as long as he was the dictator.
Does "survival of the unfittest" mean that no one other than a white, heterosexual, Christian male should be able to lead?
I know all about Hillary Clinton.She's a better option than the joke we've currently got.
trikid2200 3 years ago
Masculinity aside, this race is going Obamas way. He's much more likeable and fares better against McCain.
G702TT 4 years ago
Loud obnoxious video.
MertensCW 4 years ago 4
Critically important message: You have to be nuts to put those two back in power.
Powerful ending. We must heed Carl Bernstein's warning,intended, especially, for progressives like him: "We need to know who this woman is.... There's not a sex act mentioned in the book. What is important is Hillary savaging the women."
mspeel8 4 years ago
In other words, we must understand that this is the LAST woman who should become our first female president.
She is a chronic abuser of women in her own right. (And, as we learned after Iowa, she is--they are--despicable racists who would polarize and destroy the party and the country in order to retake the White House.)
"What kind of people are the Clintons?"
(Bob Herbert, The New York Times, January 26, 2008, Charleston, S.C.)
mspeel8 4 years ago
man, what a horrible event
Camoron339 4 years ago
very odd stuff..
ehiga 4 years ago
Is anyone aware of the criminal law suit trial that involves hillary and bill clinton? The suit was filed a couple of years ago by Peter Paul. The trial is set to begin this February 21. This month! go to hillcap site (org extention) for details. Tell everyone!
Kriegbell 4 years ago