Added: 5 years ago
From: 7messenger7
Views: 785,395
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (2,254)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • As they say: "There is no such thing as a free lunch".

    OK so, water does not burn, it is stable. Water can be split into hydrogen and oxygen by electrolysis. This hydrogen and oxygen can then be burnt releasing energy. Woohoo! Free energy!?!?

    Unfortunately splitting the water into hydrogen and oxygen requires at least as much energy as will be given off by burning the hydrogen and oxygen and most of the energy released when burning will be lost as heat. No free lunch.

  • Water is not a fuel. This video does not show water being used as a fuel. Water is a raw material that is converted into fuel thanks to a lot of electricity. Hydrogen and Oxygen in gas form are a perfectly good fuel. Unfortunately, electrolysis uses more energy than you get from burning the resultant fuel, so it cannot in any way replace petrol/gasoline as a vehicle's fuel source. Eventually, your battery will run out of juice. Given that, a straight electric car will get more range.

  • It's a scam. The entire process requires more energy than you get out of it, making it worthless. The only "conspiracy" here is that Fox news spent so little time fact checking the story, since the idea of "easy energy" made by a lone inventor in his garage is going to boost ratings far more than the truth: another con artist tries to convince well meaning people to invest in his fake invention.

  • Suck my balls fox

  • IT'S FAKE that's why FOX reported it, IT ISN'T TRUE

    Please like the 'what happened to this invention??' comment so Fox viewers and other suckers can find the truth quicker and not waste their time.

  • LOL only on Fox "News". lol

  • Inventors, Publish your inventions. Get people building it all over the world and ensure its survival.

    Once you have a Patent, the Oil company will buy "control" of it and shelf the technology, why would they promote something that puts them out of business? Let the Inventor manufacture the product and make a living from that, people will want to buy the Original brand.

    The Patent Office is a private company, you don't have to beg them to accept your idea if it already works. (deleted once)

  • Obviusly is not out because the big sharks dont want to, is that hard to see?

  • BOC Gas sells them and we have one at work, water and electricity.

  • He still alive?

  • Otherwise he was threated to death by some oil owner or someone bought the invention to have it when thae oil runs out :)

  • Too good to be true I think. Always a catch. More energy in than out?

  • Don't be surprised if we don't see or hear much about this technology for another 20 years. Keep in mind the world is currently attached by the umbilical cord to a fossil fuel IV. There are to many special interest groups in and out of government, like big oil companies, flying high on current energy standards who will make this guys path a freakin night mare b4 they give him a green light. I would love to hear the numerous stories of treachery he is most likely already enduring.

  • You need energy to split the h20 molecule, so my physicist father tells me.. Now if you could develop a biological process to doing this, then that would be something.

  • haha you guys this is outlawed tecknolgy, if you think its fake or not able to use becaseu of energy in then you too bought the line of this cant work. my car runs on water and many others as well, I know of people working at losalamos labs and theri entire department runs on water, not just their personal cars but their homes, the land/power resorces are all using this technology. dont belive all the crap of it cant be done some of us are doing it now, VIDEO?, Bob Lazar-corvett runs on water.

  • its dangerous it just wont work

  • Polictics is not a Science.

  • People are amazingly ignorant, stay in school kids.

  • I personally cant wait until we exaust the worlds entire fossil fuel supply.

    Only then will we be forced to use this type of tech. They say that it can even run off ocean water:) cant run out of that.

  • @sagequan It's hilarious that you think running out of fossil fuel means we will resort to this kind of technology. You're aware that we can create oil from coal, right? It's a dirty dirty process, but we need to do it. You're also aware we can generate fuel from biomass right? Specifically cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignan. Check out Virent, they're just starting up and the conversion to "biofuel" is getting closer and closer to being competative to with gasoline.

  • @sagequan We need oil, fundamentally. Not just because we like running cars, but because you can generate ketones from it, which is the backbone of almost ALL organic chemistry. Polymers; like a lot of the clothing you wear, cosmetics, esters for perfumes, the foam in the chair you're sitting on, not to mention a bunch of pharmaceuticals.

  • @chemistrynumpty "We need oil, fundamentally. Not just because we like running cars, but because you can generate ketones from it, which is the backbone of almost ALL organic chemistry. Polymers; like a lot of the clothing you wear, cosmetics, esters for perfumes, the foam in the chair you're sitting on, not to mention a bunch of pharmaceuticals."

    The hemp plant can provide all this and more. Shame it's illegal.

  • I will tell you all what happened, one of the oil companies bought all the rights and stuff to this invention, like all alternative fuel sources, so that they can keep making money. Greed has consumed this world, and because of it this world is dieing.

  • Great how every inventor hands the power over to the government. give it to the people and the the killing in the world will stop. Great accomplishment to make it easier to kill more people faster and keep the people dependent on infrastructure of the greedy. Another lost opportunity for man kind.

  • A car that runs on water was invented some years ago. What ever happend to that invention? The inventor was invited to Washington, The White House and the invention was never seen again.

  • If he is not dead he is black listed. this will never get beyond this for the public. Fucking Illuminati supressing humanity

  • H H O is h2o!

  • This is tha must amazing of all technologys

  • well bajagadget, the 2nd law of thermodynamics has been debunked.

  • Thumbs up if your seeing this in 2011 and they forgot about it. HOW DO YOU FORGET THIS KIND OF SHIT FOR 1...2...3.4...5...6 5 YEARS?

  • @Kiwikilljoy Because it's not what anyone thinks it is.

  • if this invention had such a big world changing potential right NOW, it wouldnt be on youtube, and would be a dependance on every government once we cant use fossil fules anymore, but i bet there is already something better kept away just awaiting that moment.

  • smart dude

  • Comment removed

  • Study of physics is just science, science is just and understanding of what we know. Science changes all the time. It would be ludicrous and naive to think that man made scientific understandings, or "laws" in this case, could not be broken. They will forever be broken as our understanding and knowledge of things evolves. I didn't need a college education to come to this hypothesis.

  • there is lots of dirt, there is lots of water there is lots of air but the fire is far far away. 7 times more energy reaches the earth every year from the sun than all the worlds total fossil fuel left. But its hard to collect , hard to store, isnt there at night. However trees and grass are free, they distribute and erect themselves, they collect solar energy and they produce fuel in a stored form. They re-absorb the carbon dioxide (released when burned) and release oxogen.

  • YEAH! PEOPLE LIKE TO WAST TIME COMING UP WITH THESE PROTOTYPES TO GET ATTENTION ONLY TO BE RIDICULED, HEAR IT IS TO SEE WORKING IN REAL WORLD PRACTICALITY, WHEN TO FAKE IT SEEMS TO BE MORE DIFFICULT THAN TO ACTUALLY PRODUCE THE REAL THING OR COME UP WITH SOMETHING ELSE THAT ACTUALLY WORKS, WHILE IDIOT TECHNOCRATS SAY IT'S THEORETICALLY IMPOSSIBLE, ALL GREAT INVENTIONS CAME FROM SOMEONES IDEA & THEN TRIAL AND ERROR. THEORIES

  • PEOPLE WE NEED TO GET TOGETHER AND START A REVOLUTION. oNLY WITH NOWLEDGE CAN WE ESCAPE THIS TYRANNICAL AUTOCRACY BY THE MONEY MASTERS. READ TESLA!!!

  • "What happened to this Invention?"

    I'll tell you what happened to it, it went down the gurgler like every other claim for perpetual motion machines! Like they always will. I find it incredible that there are people who think this is possible! It's not me ignoring that Science sometimes gets it wrong, this is a LAW of Thermodynamics. If it turned out to be wrong it would be like gravity suddenly disappearing and all of us flying off into space! Where are all the teachers out there???

  • @warren52nz The scientist is a student of nature, you do not say "that isn't supposed to happen" when it clearly does. A scientist will learn why it happens. This is the problem with academia in general today. It caters to the "church" of money. Was Galileo wrong when he proposed a heliocentric doctrine? I think not. But any attempt to convince you would be futile anyway if you believe this is impossible. Enjoy living in a bubble :).

  • @LucifersArgument You're nuts if you think you can break the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics.

    Anyway, here's the bottom line. Get this technology tested by Scientific peer review.

    Let's see some of these on the road.

    Do you think for a second that if this were possible it wouldn't be all over the newspapers instead of on a YouTube video along with people that think the Theory of Evolution is false?

    Now tell me the oil industry is trying to bury this technology and 9/11 was an American conspiracy. 8^D

  • @warren52nz ...I don't know what to say but laugh at you. My god you're a moron and I say that as an observation not an insult.

  • @LucifersArgument Well I had a degree in physics 15 years before you were born so there's only one moron in this conversation.

  • @warren52nz please do not waste both our time. I won't reply to you anymore and I apologise if you took the moron bit to be offensive but your degree only tells me that you have been spoon fed knowledge which you spew back out like a parrot without giving it thought and that you are arrogant and in complete denial, whether it be for financial vestments or otherwise. Nowhere does intellect come into it. Again I apologise for offending you but I will not waste anymore of our time.

  • @LucifersArgument " I will not waste anymore of our time."

    Thank God for that!!! LOLOL 8^D

  • This is bullshit. when they say HHO they really mean a gas mixture of H2 and O2 and some stray O1 and possibly H1. And it is very dangerous to burn this gas directly off the collection where your electrolysis is dumping it if your not separating the gasses. The flame will travel through the tube and blow up.

  • Fox has the perfect audience for this retardation.

  • NONE OF THIS IS NEW AND EVERYTHING (in this video) IS NON-PATENTABLE.

    You can't patent stainless steel plates, water and electric current that has been used to make hydrogen for over a hundred years.

    Hydrogen will work and will produce incredible horsepower. The answer is the batteries in the electric car used to create on demand hydrogen and a permanent refuelable hydrogen tank all using the same engine, 1 simple engine not 4 electric engines and 1 gas under the hood...this is MADNESS!!!

  • Another scam hits the gullible!!! You only have to understand the 2nd law of thermodynamics to know it's bullshit.

    If you're not convinced ask yourself why this isn't making news anywhere except Fox News.

  • @warren52nz i'm sorry... laws?? wasn't Einstein proven to be wrong?? it is called evolution...

  • @jahbardo " i'm sorry... laws?? wasn't Einstein proven to be wrong?? it is called evolution..."

    Not that I'm aware. When was Einstein proven wrong? And he didn't discover any laws, he invented a theory, that's different. And it's not called evolution, it's called falsification.

    Anyway, if you think they are going to get energy from nowhere and build a perpetual motion machine, join the line of embarrassed people from the past who shared similar views.

    Where are all these machines anyway???

  • @warren52nz i'm sorry, E=MC^2 ?? science evolves... every day!

  • @jahbardo "E=MC^2 ?? science evolves... every day!"

    That's too vague for me to get your point. Are you saying E=MC² is wrong?

    They used it to create nuclear weapons and nuclear power plants. What are you on about? The new experimental result that suggests they've found something that can travel faster than C?

  • its the damn government! you see the government have this car that runs on water...

  • what happened to this invention??...hmm the Oxyhydrogen torch was invented over 100 years ago, and is still in use with jewelers world wide, yes the water is reusable but the electricity it uses to create the H2 and O2 is not. 2nd the reason that only jewelers use them is since it such a small scale the wasteful use of power (less then 40% return) but high heat is worth the extra coast. instead of thinking everything is some conspiracies, look the shit up. none of this is new, its snake oil

  • @1crazyfocker How it it even possible through thermodynamics for it not to damage human flesh???

  • @santran are you talking about how he is able to touch it? if so thats simple its the way it burns, you may not know this but H2 and O2 is rocket fuel. if you look up engine test for the space shuttle you can watch as ice forms on the edge of the truster cones even tho there is thousands of pounds of trust at thousands of degrees less then 1/2 in away from it. I just dont have the room to even paraphrase it here, but NASA explains it pretty good.

  • @1crazyfocker O3 is a propellant H2 is not. Liquid propellants are reacting with almost everything and it is very hard to store it so they are cooling the rocket all time before launch and even some time after so it will not over heat. That is why you can see ice.

  • @zelibober try again, first try reading up on the stuff instead of guessing, 2nd, LO2/LO3 is not a "propellant" or fuel it is an oxidizer, the LH2 is the propellant or fuel, it is kept in a liquid state for the simple fact that you can store more "gas" in a liquid form. and all of these facts still have nothing to do with why ice forms during firings of the main engines less then an inch away from thousands dagree flame. really this is common stuff but you do have to read to find it.

  • @1crazyfocker All that is being done is splitting the molecule, which may not take much electricity at all. The elements aren't being created, they're simply being mined, extracted, or separated. At least, that's what I gather from this

  • @wildmantis1 try researching electrolysis, to learn a little more about it, and by "create" I ment to separate, thus creating gas from water!, the H2 and O2 comes from the H2O that is water, and the electricity it uses to do this is 200% more energy then you can get back from that same H2 and O2, spend just 5 minutes researching it it and you will see all the scamms and how simple this is and how OLD it is, hell even Wiki gets it right

  • Run your car or save an African village from dehydration?

  • @theoriginalbensteele They can find their own water :P

  • This, fascinating as it is, doesn't solve a consumption problem, it just creates a new one: in 200 years, the Earth would look exactly like Mars.

  • @mrmomoto The water re-condenses

  • @mrmomoto Wow, no it wouldn't... You truly have no idea how much water is on Earth.

  • whats the difference betwen H2O and HHO ? - there was another water powered car that the inventor died and it disapeared - seeing how this is the only info on it - maybe the same happened

  • Nobody who invents anything like this will live. They will mysteriously have a "heart Attack" and then the plans will disappear.

  • @mayamanign It's sad, but I think you're onto something.

  • This is awsome!But hotter than the surface of the sun?Lol!

  • This is not new just rehashed for the ignorant ,takes 5,X more energy to separate H O from H2O than it is to make gasoline . Back in the 70s we experimented at our local high school

    using electrolysis to separate the gases then mixing it in oxy torch to burn.Its a real shame that this science isn't shown any more and stop people re-inventing the wheel..

  • @evilspiritchild unfortunatly new hydrogen cars also use electrolysis, the electricity for which comes from coal power stations, or nuclear, but getting the fuel for nuclear is insanly difficult and energy expensive

  • @evilspiritchild if u did it, any chance u can show me some blueprints?

  • I find it hilarious that people still do not understand how this works.

    Water is hydrogen and oxygen. When separate gasses, they burn when combined, releasing a lot of energy. All this is true.

    What everyone forgets is that you have to provide energy IN to get the water to separate into hydrogen and oxygen. The energy IN always is more than the energy you get OUT.

    Always.

  • @bajagadget i'm sorry my brother, but why can't he use electricity to electrolise the water??? a simple idea... maybe they know this.. maybe it's just not profitable...

  • and you can buy this... search before saying mad stuff!

  • @jahbardo "and you can buy this... search before saying mad stuff!"

    Oh really? Where?

  • @bajagadget how do you know you simply haven't been lied to?

  • @bajagadget and so that is why this technology failed?.....

  • @bajagadget, UNLESS, you're a wizard.

  • @bajagadget I blame the public school system for allowing people to grow up as scientific illiterates.

  • @NsaneNtheNbrane And I blame the private school system for allowing people to grow up to be elitist twats!

  • @bajagadget Wrong it takes as little as 12volts and 20amps to seperate water into hydrogen and oxygen thats less power than even the shittiest car battery. Most car batteries are rated at 450cca and as high as 800cca that's easily enough to run a water fuel cell.

  • @bajagadget yes but the energy being used to separate hydrogen and oxygen is electricity which is clean compared to gas

  • @bajagadget I do not think so.

    It is your TPTB trained mind that tells you that it must be so.

  • @valuableknowledgegrp - err, no, it's called the Law of Entropy. Google it.

  • @JBofBrisbane I know what entropy is. You will soon see some stuff that you will not believe even when you are travelling in it.

  • @bajagadget Pretty much. The Law of Conservation of Energy is pretty obvious - you're not going to just create or destroy energy. You have to put work in to get work out. There is no free ride, there just isn't.

  • @bajagadget My question is this: Different separation techniques get varying amounts of hydrogen with varying amounts of current. Why is there not a technique that will cross the line and produce enough hydrogen that burning it will exceed the input energy? What about a pulse generator that can match a harmonic with the atomic weights and bump off the hydrogen with very little current? I heard something about this but haven't been able to confirm. What's your opinion?

  • thats awsome

  • This is happening yet today by at least one group with which I am familiar. The inventors fear ... something.

    Hopefully, it will be brought to fruition.

  • He's dead. His blue-prints and machine are destroyed. 

  • Comment removed

  • @btancisback no he is not. try looking his name up or his company. this is all over the place ever since it was first discovered over 100 yrs ago. but its wasteful, it more dangerous then oxy acetylene, (hydrogen leaks thru most things), and it costs more then oxy acetylene. but it is still used by the same ppl that have been useing it for over 100 yrs jewelers, its not well known because its over all worthless. Hydrogen is not a fuel source. its more like an inefficient storage battery.

  • @1crazyfocker I'm sorry. Obviously you don't know me or my humor. I was making fun of all the conspiracy theorists on here that swear up and down that anyone who invents something worthwhile is killed and the machine is destroyed. Sorry about that, man. I'll have to remember to make sure people know im kidding.

  • @btancisback WOW thats one i just was not expecting...lol

  • OBVIOUSLY THE LEFT WIND FIX IT

  • you go against big oil and youwill get crushed,theydont spend hundreds ofmillions lobbying politicians to let anyone come along and offer alternatives. i predict five years from now this guy is still in the patent stage wondering what went wrong.

  • lexus bought this car engine

  • @jellysling4444 ...and destroyed all evidence and records.

    That's how the fuel and power industry works.

    They pay big money to shut people like this guy up, or kill him. Next time, it should be put online. Clear and easy instructions/blueprints, for all the world to see.

  • No doubt the banksters and fascist corporatists and right wingers will kill him.

  • a black man invent this shit

  • Everything on fox news are lies, even true things once said on fox news become lies

  • This was a fake people!!!

  • @74pbg <------ IS A FAG PEOPLE !!!

  • @74pbg, you have a fake mind, it's been brain-washed into believing that gasoline is the only known fuel and will always remain the only usable fuel.

  • funny how this was in 2006, wonder what happened to this guy and his idea?

    That's what happens when you get involved with the government, all they care about is money, and I seriously doubt all those politicians will be happy without that oil money in their pockets. Hence that's why I've never heard of this guy since.

  • @TheCrazyBreton No, you never heard of him "since" is because its pretty much useless, except where its been used for the past 100 yrs, by jewelers. its simple, this is wasteful, uses way to much power for such a small gain, it needs a huge box just for a needle touch, plus the elecrtodes needs to be replaces a lot (more cost). finaly instead of relying on YT for your news, try searching his name denny klein or his company, he's still out trying to sell old tech and snake oil.

  • 110 dislikes understand physics and chemistry.

  • The oil companies will make damm sure this invention like all the hundreds of others will NEVER make it to the consumer.

  • @OttoKrinklebottom do you really believe that? try searching oxyhydrogen welders, there all over the place. they have been around for over 100yrs. its pretty much what ever jewelers uses. there is no cover-up other then by the "free energy" scammers. hell if they just told the truth (that no OU, PMM, Mag motor works) all these back yard inventors instead of giveing up after being scammed, might have spent time working one their own ideas, something new. and then who knows. so who does more harm?

  • @1crazyfocker I would assume you 've herd of Tessla ? On the testimony of his wife she says that the day after Tessla died the FBI raided his offices, broke open his safe and walked out with a mountain of drawings , plans and other papers. He was working on microwave energy transference at the time as well as other ideas. I dont think they broke in to get his Hungarian goolash receipe. !

  • @OttoKrinklebottom in fact i have, he just so happens to be my "hero", and just went on a rant on how much we owe him, and how his paper work was released to the Tesla museum in BELGRAD!!! instead of here in the USA. instead they suck Edison (quack IMHO) D*#K. but they took those because and you can look this up, he said he came up with a death ray, his test with energy transmission was explorede and test alot happened yrs b4 his death. but dont change the facts its all over the place, -cont-

  • @OttoKrinklebottom -cont-2

    the biggest threat to the whole "free energy" movement is not big oil, or the gov, but the free energy idiots themself. 1st look at it like this, they (oil.gov) trust in science, which states that its impossable (physics) 2. they(oil) love these electrolysis devices, they use over 200% more power then normal. 3. the Free energy idiots spread lies, so ppl send them or waste there time and money on scams, instead of trying their own ideas. -cont-

  • @OttoKrinklebottom -cont-3

    after speading so much time and money working on scams that dont work, they just give up. now i believe in science and physics, but i also believe like Tesla and Einstein did, that any is possible. so with that being said, if the "KEY" to the discovery is going to be found it will be by back yard inventors. but since so many get scammed and give up b4 trying some of their own ideas, when that could have been the one! so who do you think is doing more harm?

  • @OttoKrinklebottom - No the FBI, at the behest of the gov't of the day, wanted to confiscate any ideas Tesla was working on for national security - and why wouldn't they ? The politicians or FBI are not scientists, so they don't have any idea what is valuable science or what is quackery - so they take the lot ! Tesla provided the USA and our world with great technology - but genius and insanity are very close. No conspiracy here - just a gov't being careful !

  • 'literally as hot as the surface of the sun' what a fucking idiot.

  • 110 dislikes work for the oil company......

  • 110 dislikes work the oil company......

  • idiotic people i read... look arround, water, sun, wind, soil. they have all been used to generate some sort of energy...biodiesel geothermal energy and all other kinds of stuff can ALL be used together to generate ALL our energy needs (and much much more). that's worldwide. actually, i can't imagine a more expensive and poluting way of getting energy than petrol...there's some serious amount of brain-washed slaves claiming stupid shit in the name of science...

  • you better watch 'Zeitgeist moving forward' here on youtube movie. After watching it, you will tell about it to all the people you know.

  • It is not burning water.

    Water is already at the low energy state of having combined with Oxygen.

  • LETS GO!!!! WE GOT THE TECH, COME ON PEOPLE LET USE IT!!!

  • yeah,,,,this technology catches on and water will be more expensive than oil

  • @inkey2 water is a lot easier to find and process I would believe.

  • light my weed

  • water "bottled" is currently more expensive than gasoline so...

  • It was fake

  • we should harness the energy of my farts

  • @FoooDogSoup I think I saw a DoD request for that kind of gas. Something about Hershey bomb.

  • bad reporting.

  • they have a e oven use this hoo gas 

  • @1crazyfocker is in need of passing 6th grade for the first time, then you will hit puberty and meet "girls" and wont give a shit about this. wow why dont you "do the math on that"

  • @howitzer579 Girls: The only thing in the universe that matters.

  • hey crazy crazy focker, electricity is a replenishable resource, its not like its stored in underground deposits jackass. where the fuck do you think it comes from they generate it using water and wind and if the water is reusable so that means, yes you guessed it it means it can produce more electricity in the future, fucking idiot.

  • @howitzer579 I'm not going to berate you for being uneducated. Considering your favorites include Dragon Ball Z clips, Basshunter songs, and Linkin Park techno remixes shows that you're probably in the 4th grade.

  • @NecroNetica now thats funny...thanks. I find the reply funny as hell to read. the best part is if they try and shot down the facts....it normaly goes in this order 1. name calling 2. off the wall idea 3. try to change the subject 4. name call again 5. get back on track, but then derails 6. change the subject 7. claim a cover up, and I must be brain washed, or work for big oil or Gov 8. (a new one) call me a republican thats the funniest one of them all. anyway great comment!
  • @howitzer579 HA HA HA....i will agree with NecroNetica.....now let me dumb this down for you like so many others....less then 10% to 20% of the worlds power (electricty) comes from a renewable source, the rest comes from fossil fuesl, and to use your own words, then that means it does come from "stored underground deposits" HA HA, electricty is not a "replenishable resource" because its not a resource, its an energy form. and since 50% of the electricty is wasted when makeing H2 and O2 -cont-

  • @howitzer579 -cont- part 2

    is wated in the form of heat, then if you tried to convert that same H2&O2 back in too electricty then you loss another 50% to heat (with a fuel cell) or 65% to heat (I.C.E) so you get a return of only 17.5% to 25% of what you put into it. so it is in no way renewable or green. if we just used wind,water, solar then who the hell cares about any of this to begin with, -cont-

  • @howitzer579 -cont- part 3

    but the reality is that making oxy acetylene uses less greenhouse gasses then this does to make H2 and O2. plus its safer, since hydrogen is so small it can "leak" thru valves, rubber, even some metals. Hydrogen has its place, but its not a fuel source in anyway, its only a storage "battery" all you can do is get back a fraction of the energy (thats electricty) you put into it. now instead of trolling poorly, learn 2nd grade math and 4th grade science...HA HA DBZ LOL

  • hurry the fuck up and get this out man, im sick of using oil

  • Comment removed

  • And bgupta2001, the space goes after the punctuation. And you need to speak English and see a doctor.

  • This is definitely not a new thing. Anyone can separate water into it's two main elements, the problem is that it uses electricity. If you think about it, not even cars run entirely on gas. Every car has a battery that starts the spark plugs and does other things, and that battery uses electricity that is likely obtained from coal. While hydrogen is clean energy, it is also really inefficient.

  • And thanx messenger, if not for you i probably wouldnt of realised that there also is that potential using radio waves. This post one day could spark an idea in someones mind to develope better more efficient ideas....

  • Depends on how you view the situation. Your theory that it uses alot of energy is founded on what? He never stated at what frequency, and at what voltage.. Some all over the world are building cells for PRIUS, that can sustain itself, even requireing to be regulated with high output AC 3 Phase.. I do agree in most part, but i think in this instance, any conclusion is speculation...

  • @bgupta2001 WTF??!!

  • a friend of a guy i know invented a battery charger for non rechargeable batteries, big name battery companies heard about his invention and took him to court, saying he was breaking their patents, they put him out of business with legal fees and court costs long before he got his business running.

  • Comment removed

  • .REQUEST to give DEATH PANALITY FOR me,my mother ,and father ,and even to my two brothers,and one sister to soul ,grand soul ,kundaliy , by giving or injecting poision ( which science & scientits can produce ) and ( shown in the "dasavataram "tamil & hindi india movie )burn infront of everyone on the earth only .

  • GOVERMENT KILLED HIM...

  • poop.

    

  • omg is he still alive

  • i willl buy

  • Iol comment wars

  • It would put to many people out of work and that would never happen the government makes to much revenue .

  • Also it can't turn hotter than the surface of the sun if it did it would ignite the atmosphere

  • @superbranster no it would not, most ppl forget that the surface of the sun is only around 10,000 degrees F, and yes thats hot, but a CFL's plasma is that hot yet we can hold it in our hands, now if it was as hot as say the center of the sun, then yes your statemnet would be true, in fact ifthe head of a needle was as hot as the center of the sun and placed at the north pole it would be hot enough to melt the south pole ice.

  • I want one

  • The only way to effectively run an engine on water using water as the fuel rather than the working fluid as steam. Is not by electrolosis of H2O to produce the hydrogen and oxygen. A more effective and efficient process is the conversion of the H20 into H2, CO, and CH4. Which is a simple very old and once common process that seems to have been forgotten. It remains to be seen if the process can be reduced in scale to enable its use in a car.

    Unfortunately testing it is currently beyond my means

  • Petty arguing. Many people have found efficient ways of separating hydrogen and oxygen. Some were shut up (one way or another) and others were not able to resolve issues (material oxides away). It's electrolysis, people continue to find more efficient ways to do it and will continue to. The only thing close to a secret which gets rediscovered once and a while is the most efficient electric signature: modulation/amplitude ect. Owning the tech is like owning the process of fire, it won't happen.

  • @1crazyfocker I'm not a troll at all actually... I just despise people like you. Stan Meyer was a scam? Really? What if I told you I know two of his colleagues personally who had their families threatened? Let me guess.. "prove it" right? It was NOT a scam. You're just a fucking idiot republican. Let me also guess.... UFOS dont exist right? You're one of the morons who will look facts right in the face and turn a blind side so it doesnt hurt your ego.Disclosure project - google it. I'm done

  • @monstermash2011 HA HA "UFOS dont exist right" HA HA if trying to prove a point thats the worste example to use..HA HA (in the voice of Yoda) "Strong is the fail with this one" and yes Stan Meyer was nothing but a fraud, dont have to take anyone word on that it public record, he was charged and about to be convected when he died, try looking at facts not what morons tell you, remember (whos more foolish the fool or the fool that follows him), hope you dont loss everything buying into this junk

  • @1crazyfocker So hold on.. You're saying UFO's dont exist? Is that what you're saying?I suggest you listen to the hundreds of worlds most reputable people who lobby the US congress every year, in the Disclosure project. Former NASA astronauts, Ministry of Defense, Former governors, air traffic controllers,military officials WWII vets(you know Tom Brokaws"Greatest generation" no nonsense guys)Listen to them ALL say they know for a fact they not only exist but our gov't has reverse engineered them

  • @1crazyfocker So go do that, then come back and preach to me about how conspiracies dont exist and blah blah blah. Next you'll tell me artificial sweeteners are harmless and dont lower you immune system. (I'm living proof havent even had a tickle in my throat much less being sick in 5 years since eliminating them from my diet)Then you'll tell me that our food isnt poisoned on purpose I know I'm a CRAZY kook.Like I said I know stans colleagues and they will tell you straight up they were silenced

  • @monstermash2011 HA HA and now the subject change to get off topic. i said nothing about my beliefs. i just said was a bad choice to prove a point..LOL.. and like i said instead of takeing the words of others why not look at public records and court records, and police records, and news tapes of the trail? oh yeah because those are all faked and your "friends" and the only ones telling you the truth....the facts are simple this video is of an old invention that is wasteful and has no future

  • @1crazyfocker No actually my man you are speaking with someone who is highly educated. I'm typing on a phone and quickly at that, so forgive me if I am coming across as sophomoric in my appro