@UrTheFakeOne I'm not sure if your right, i was just wondering if you ment CT, theres a lot of sick cars there and ive been there, I hope your right! that means a bugatti has been there thats awesome lol
When I watched this I ejaculated in my pants. The cum got stuck to my pubes and testicles and shit and my balls bloated due to blowing my load so fast.
@fergus1494 if you try and do that the engine will blow up in a matter of hours of continual driving... waste of 40k that could be better spent on an old 911, which will have more appeal than a ricer's 1000hp prelude that will blow up shortly after being built
@wafflecopter3 so a 5.7l pushrod v8 that has been known to make more then 850hp na (nascar) and hold over 1500hp single turbo in boost for many drag/dyno runs and 1000hp on boost for thousands of km's are ricy engines? Sorry mate but a good strong block with good strong internals and an experienced racing engine builder can do it. Might i say, most of these engines are punched out to 400+ cubic inches instead of 350.. and why a 911 when you could get an ultima gtr, faster then a farrari fxx..
@thizguy94 if you were to pay attention he is responding to someone else who is telling a truthful fact about the bugattis engine so go read the comment he is responding to then come back
Internal combustion engines are about 15% efficient. Putting the same amount of energy into an electric motor (which can be as much as 95% efficient) could produce a car with 6000 horsepower, assuming the transmission could take it.
@gguilford72 But turbocharging an engine increases efficiency. If I recall correctly, normal automobiles have an efficiency in the high teens and low 20's. Turbocharging can increase it to around low 30's.
@DC5Pro When you say "turbocharging can increase..." it makes it sound like throwing a turbo on anything will automatically increase efficiency. Some turbo cars are efficient because they have small engines with low displacement that consume little fuel to begin with and a turbo gives the underpowered engine some oomph. Sometimes it's about wanting V8 power with 4 or 6 cylinders and a turbo. My 6 cylinder Ford Ranger probably gets better gas mileage than any of my turbo 4 cylinder Porsches.
@TheHevquip You're interchanging "efficiency" (thermal) with gas mileage...that's incorrect. Efficiency is the work you get out divided by the work you put in. That % is the thermal efficiency of a motor, the majority of the loss is because of lost heat. By turbocharging a motor, you're using the otherwise wasted exhaust gases to further increase the power of the motor. That's increasing thermal efficiency...gas mileage has no place in this discussion.
my personal opinion is this is one hell of a supercar, ruined by people like simon cowell who dont know or care about anything to do with cars but buy it anyway to show off.
I think people who say the engine is capable of 3000hp it probably has the potential to do 3000hp. Just no one has the balls to increase boost and tune their bugatti to 3000hp. If I have 50 million dollars to spend I would buy 2 and do 3000hp on one just to see if it can do 3000hp.
I always wonder how the acceleration of the Veyron compares to my GSXR750. I.e. acceleration on the bike is far above the "laugh out loud" enjoyment type of acceleration, it is just outright scary in 1st and 2nd. I wonder if the acceleration of the Veyron would impress bike riders. I believe 0-100 or 0-120 mph times of the GSXR are about with in 0.5 s of the Veyron. Can any one hazard a guess how different Veyron's acceleration would "feel"?
Just to think us Americans had nothing to do with the development of this car! :-D America can't make cars like this and never will, Coz were stupid... period!! However money will allow us Americans to buy this car! Such a shame... All show but no go thats us.......
@neil9443 ur an idiot the ssc ultimate aero is the fastest car in the world faster than a bugatti and its an american car so ur dumb american cars are the best in the world
@dalejonessexybeast ultimate aero is the fastest, but in terms of luxury, performance, driveability, nothing touches this thing. name another automatic that can do 250+ STOCK and still comfortably putter around the city in traffic. it terminates all discussions and doubts about what is and isn't possible
Why are all the owners so scared to drive these cars??????????? "I'll hit the brakes real hard". Yeah, and do you buy new carpet for your home and take your shoes of too? Wouldn't want to get any dirt on it now would we? Every Bugatti Veyron video on YouTube is so weak. I've yet to see any of them do anything so special. Perhaps it was all just a hoax from the magazines, maybe these cars are really slow. Maybe if they get over hundred MPH too many times they fall apart.
The tires are the only street legal in the world certified (for insurnce reasons) for hte speeds it pulls. The tires are apparently around $25,000.
Geez, I wonder why they aren't driven hard. They are trophy pieces. If you own one, most likely you will HAVE another Supercar (Lamborghini, Ferrari, Koenigsegg etc...) which will be more FUN (handling and sports wise) as opposed to the lap of luxury your in with the Bugatti.
@tkdman9 Yeah, I'd hate to buy a car that cost too much to drive. LoL. So what you're saying I guess then is that you pay 2,000,000.00 dollars for a car that goes 250 MPH, but only drive it to about 100 in which case I can drive my girlfriend's Corrolla faster and have never been around a telephone pole? All's I'm saying is that if you're going to drive like a granny then you can do it for much less. Pretty pricey ornament don't you think?
@tkdman9 Really my whole point to all this was just trying to egg on one of those Veyron owners out there, hoping they'll read my comment and then decide to give us a better "test drive" if you know what I mean? HeHe!
Ignorance is always fun on youtube! First of the Bugatti Veyron cost $1M-$2.2M which in its self is impressive. Then you have to pay $21,000 for a routine check up. Then $38,000 to change tires (which needs to be done every few thousand kilometers). Then $46,000 every fourth tire change to get your tires x-rayed. So lets say you drove this every day (12,000 miles/year). So that is approximately $462,000 per year for routine basics. So next time you say why don't they drive them... think!
dude that shit made me laugh my ass off!! kudos to you for telling that stupid bitch whats up, and if i ever heard someone refer to something as bonkers id probably slap the mother fucker lol.
For all the haters out there. Motor trend said that the Veyron actually could produce 3000 horses. However 2000 of those are invariably lost through the massive heat that the engine produces. So at the crank, it comes out to be 1001.
That is completely false. Do not ever try to make bullshit like that up. No matter how well you cool the engine, the power will always be around 1001ps.
Acutally, that's the problem. You see, the 1001hp are produced directly by the engine.What Motor trend said is that if Bugatti's engineers could eficiently use the energy disipated through heat, instead of just cooling it away, they'd have a 3k HP engine. Simple as that. It's physics, energy is the same, no matter if it's electric, thermal, nuclear...Ps sry for my bad english :).
Yes, but you could do that with ANY engine is the point. Energy will always be lost by heat, and unless we find a way to turn that heat back into energy it's gone for good. So it's not even worth mentioning the point. If a Prius engine didn't lose energy from heat, it would make 200hp+. But does anyone ever bother to mention that? No, because it's stupid as hell.
Okay, you go invest around a half, to a full billion dollars and design the technology, then make is small enough and light enough to be efficent in a automobile.
You'll make a lot of money, just good luck getting the starting capital.
@Skandalf they actually can make it quicker, its has the ability to go i think up to aroun 265 mph (dont quote me on the number) but its starts to become uncontrollable so i think they probably should just leave it at 1001.
@Skandalf Problem is, even the most efficient internal combustion engines (extremely large container ship engines) are only about 50% efficient, the rest is heat.
@Skandalf yea cept the idiots that made it build a 16 cylinder quad turbo engine that only produces 1000HP.. what a joke... i can do that with twin turbos and a 5.0L V8
Big difference is that tuned twin turbo 5.0L V8 engine is more stressed than a quad turbo W16 engine. The latter is more advanced and built for torque which explain its low rev. It can easily output more but needs to follow industry emission standard.
@xmodrock yes as someone else said, its just easier and has less stress on the engine therefore making it more reliable. its possible to get 1000 bhp from 2.0 4 cyl turbos, but most of the time they will be catastrophically unreliable
@FUCK202 better tuning better cams and so on.. ;-) then less strain on bigger turbos.. the engine is huge.. its the same size as the zues camaro 707 CI V8 that makes 1200HP N/A... why does this car need turbos at all?
@xmodrock its also the same size as a dodge viper, which in its most expensive specification, produces 600bhp. im guessing when you quad turbo that it will produce around 1000bhp. i think Volkswagen could have got more out of the engine. as you say, that camaro has 1200bhp. they must have had a reason not to get more from it. the only one i can think of is to improve reliability or maybe refinement - because that interior of the veyron is luxurious. it could be a daily car if your rich enough
@FUCK202 youre completely off on that viper estimation lmao a 600hp viper could easily do 1500hp+ with only 2 turbos (doesnt need 4 to do over 1000). its all about reliability...sure they couldve put a 3L twin turbo V6 with 1000hp but you wouldnt be able to push it to its limits everyday without a mechanics crew behind you. W16 with 4 turbos sounds like overkill but that means less strain on the engine and turbos.
@BoredLikeHelI allright, i'm not an professionally trained estimator of quad turbocharging a dodge viper acr like you then. and the second half of that comment just agreed with everything i have been saying
@FUCK202 Dude has got a point. A specific amount of energy, thus power, comes from burning a specific volume of gasoline with a specific volume of air (well, oxygen) at a specific rate (time), right? That pressure, if spread over larger engine volume, WILL be lower, thus creating less strain on the mechanics (mainly pistons and head gasket) of the engine. Of course, there is a million ways around this, which is what tunning companies do. I'm just saying he had a valid point. Cheerz.
@TheRadiastral what are you people doing here? i've been saying this all along, and then every now and then get get a reply like yours telling me that im wrong, but then you go and repeat what i said in the first place!! DUDE HAS GOT A POINT, BUT ITS THE SAME ONE AS MINE!
@FUCK202 No need to get emotional. I haven't read the WHOLE thread, only the last few pages of comments, you could very well have said exactly that, I haven't noticed. Nowhere did I suggest you're wrong. Let me do you justice and say YOU've got a point too! Peace, eh?
@TheRadiastral my last comment was 'well..you agreed with me'...you didnt need to read back more than one page, and the one before that was probably back 1 page and says 'the second half of that comment just agreed with evertything i have been saying. 2 people have now repeated exactly the same thing to me and its fucking annoying. can you buy peace of ebay?
To further elaborate, this is also why two stroke engines usually have no more than two cylinders and four stroke engines usually have more than four cylinders. The engines with 2 or less cylinders need to make power more of the time so they use two stroke. Engines with 4+ cylinders can use four stroke because they're making power all of the time. Four stroke engines are also smoother, and do not need to operate on as many RPM.
The engine produces 987hp/1001ps at the flywheel. Those are the official figures from Volkswagen themselves. If you honestly think it's putting out 3000hp at the crank, you're fucking retarded. Four stroke gasoline engines aren't "one quarter efficient", they make power a fourth of the time because of the stroke cycle. Two stroke engines make power half the time. It doesn't change how much power the engine makes, but how frequently it is produced.
Andrea felt something brewing and bubbling in her turdholder and knew she would probably be spending a lengthy stint ass painting the Starbucks bathroom.
Yes i do, it says the "engine" produces 987 hp. Being Bhp, whatever the whp is, it has to be less than the bhp, how the fuck can the engine produce 987hp and the horsepower at the wheels be more?
@zenithskull they do it so it looks more impressive to you, so in other words they get a 1001hp car to accel as fast as a 1050hp car. WO how'd they do that... ha well they lied lol
@morri908 That would be the super sport. At a cost of over $700k more than the "standard" Bugatti Veyron. The original still makes 1001hp. I, personally, would never dump that kind of cash into something with speed you will never be able to use, ever.
@1ightweightSukka Koenigseggs are very nice.. I don't know if i'd ever be able to afford a supercar like those, so i stay closer to reality. Like 'vettes, Ferraris, Lambo.. stuff like that..
@morri908 Well shit, I know I'll probably never be able to afford one, it's all dreaming as far as I'm concerned. Personally, I'd like to drive one almost more than own one. Seems like an awful lot of responsibility to carry. They are just soooooo sexy. love love love Koenigseggs. LOL, Ferraris and Lambos are reality?? I'll take my Boss Mustang and get outta town, lol. They pretty nice too. As for Vettes, they got their quarks and aren't for me, but still great cars.
@1ightweightSukka I didn't mean vettes specifically. but vettes vipers and the new boss 302 stang (my new "in my eventual pricerange" dream car) But yeah, those supercars have super pricetags, especially for upkeep.
I don't know how much they cost elsewhere to rent, but in the UK they can be rented from about £16,000 ($25,000) a day or £45,000 for a weekend. Still very expensive, but perhaps a gift to yourself with some windfall cash.
@zenithskull That tends to be the trend now days. I would like to say it's for insurance purposes, but at 1001hp and >$1.5 Million, I'm not sure underrating would do anything. The new Ford 5.0 produces usually about 440hp from the factory, with a claimed 412hp on premium.
sounds like he just had an orgasm lol
itouch306 1 week ago
O WOW.. YOU HAVE A VEYRON? U RICH BASTARD!! SO JEALOUS..!
Langtry613 1 month ago
ehhh my ford flex has more horse power
MixMakerKing 2 months ago 4
my lambo sounds more spectacular...
janman92 2 months ago
@janman92 Your lambo has better torque, giving it the appearance of more speed.
xXCrimsonVirtueXx 2 months ago
@xXCrimsonVirtueXx seems locgic to me ;D
janman92 2 months ago
This was shot around Greenwich, wasn't it? ;)
UrTheFakeOne 2 months ago
@UrTheFakeOne Do mean Greenwich conneticut?
kotg0903 2 months ago
@kotg0903 Yes. Am I right?
UrTheFakeOne 2 months ago
@UrTheFakeOne I'm not sure if your right, i was just wondering if you ment CT, theres a lot of sick cars there and ive been there, I hope your right! that means a bugatti has been there thats awesome lol
kotg0903 2 months ago
@kotg0903 Oh ok got it, yea Greenwich is known for having very nice cars driving around there.
UrTheFakeOne 2 months ago
automatic gears? you could accelerate alot faster with manual,(high rpm=high hp)
rubikfan1 2 months ago
What a monster.. the torque must be amazing
7echHD 2 months ago
110 mph..................NOPE.
TheOmegaeyes 3 months ago
/watch?v=i5zD3nlnDZM
tinleo333 3 months ago
lol he only got up to 70-75mph
boi2012 4 months ago
it looks the same speed as my bike.
nitrousninja1 4 months ago
How Fast Was That 100 Mph?
mccrackenphillip 4 months ago
On-ramps, love em :)
C70drvr 5 months ago 12
When I watched this I ejaculated in my pants. The cum got stuck to my pubes and testicles and shit and my balls bloated due to blowing my load so fast.
Tonyhorton55 5 months ago
well it does have 4 turbo chargers....
asians3nsation83 5 months ago
@asians3nsation83 Pitty it only takes 40k and an experianced engine builder to get 1000hp from a single turbo ls engine..
fergus1494 5 months ago
@fergus1494 if you try and do that the engine will blow up in a matter of hours of continual driving... waste of 40k that could be better spent on an old 911, which will have more appeal than a ricer's 1000hp prelude that will blow up shortly after being built
wafflecopter3 5 months ago
@wafflecopter3 Yeah, too bad he said L-S. not i-s. I didn't see anyone say anything about hondas.
kazanyemmi 5 months ago
@kazanyemmi that was an example
wafflecopter3 5 months ago
@wafflecopter3 so a 5.7l pushrod v8 that has been known to make more then 850hp na (nascar) and hold over 1500hp single turbo in boost for many drag/dyno runs and 1000hp on boost for thousands of km's are ricy engines? Sorry mate but a good strong block with good strong internals and an experienced racing engine builder can do it. Might i say, most of these engines are punched out to 400+ cubic inches instead of 350.. and why a 911 when you could get an ultima gtr, faster then a farrari fxx..
fergus1494 5 months ago
well they dont own it because it is a test drive but they must have some money to be allowed to test drive a car like this
HennesseyHPE1000 5 months ago
did you put the 1000 hp on?
obamallama100 5 months ago
how much did it cost to install a flux capacitor ?
latin0prid3 5 months ago 48
@latin0prid3 uhhhhhhh whats a flux capacitor?!?! in retarted voice
360geek 5 months ago
HOLY SHIT U OWN A BUGATTI??? mind fucked
Laurboc 6 months ago
" entering another dimension, please hold for one of our representatives"
* backround music *
MyDogBarksToU 6 months ago
I believe they used the W 16 so that the emphasis on "big" went with the rest of the car...Big engine, big speed and acceleration, big price tag.
crzygarcon12 6 months ago
I wonder how fast it could accelerate if there was no traction loss at all.
twisterwiper 7 months ago
110? That must have been mad scary!
TheToekutter 7 months ago
how you could make this video boring i have no clue
KingOfAllNoobs 7 months ago
theres only 1.2 k horsepower at most in buggatis stupid ass.
(to guy below me)
thizguy94 7 months ago
@thizguy94 if you were to pay attention he is responding to someone else who is telling a truthful fact about the bugattis engine so go read the comment he is responding to then come back
Drift4Life100 7 months ago
@thizguy94 Look at the top comment stupid ass.
roflpwnize 7 months ago
Hmm, and it was uphill
tammelol 8 months ago
wait this was somewhere around nyc? looks like long island lol...
tima200690 9 months ago
The title should have been, pedal to the metal
Anusarthi 9 months ago
he jizzed at the end :L
fenderguy2K10 10 months ago
jjunkers- i told you after the test drive bring my car back to garage,but you have to film and play with you tube like allways.............
orthodoxdragon1 10 months ago
I think I would have fainted by the time I would have got to the top of that road!
ChristmasTrax 11 months ago
tell me how you got enough moneh? :P
doom996 11 months ago
At 0:14 the guy jizzes his pants
Smith92Steven 1 year ago
pedal to the floor doesnt sound right, its either pedal to the metal or flooring it
bamboali 1 year ago
Internal combustion engines are about 15% efficient. Putting the same amount of energy into an electric motor (which can be as much as 95% efficient) could produce a car with 6000 horsepower, assuming the transmission could take it.
Shudder at the thought.
gguilford72 1 year ago
@gguilford72 But turbocharging an engine increases efficiency. If I recall correctly, normal automobiles have an efficiency in the high teens and low 20's. Turbocharging can increase it to around low 30's.
DC5Pro 1 year ago
@DC5Pro When you say "turbocharging can increase..." it makes it sound like throwing a turbo on anything will automatically increase efficiency. Some turbo cars are efficient because they have small engines with low displacement that consume little fuel to begin with and a turbo gives the underpowered engine some oomph. Sometimes it's about wanting V8 power with 4 or 6 cylinders and a turbo. My 6 cylinder Ford Ranger probably gets better gas mileage than any of my turbo 4 cylinder Porsches.
TheHevquip 11 months ago
@TheHevquip You're interchanging "efficiency" (thermal) with gas mileage...that's incorrect. Efficiency is the work you get out divided by the work you put in. That % is the thermal efficiency of a motor, the majority of the loss is because of lost heat. By turbocharging a motor, you're using the otherwise wasted exhaust gases to further increase the power of the motor. That's increasing thermal efficiency...gas mileage has no place in this discussion.
DC5Pro 11 months ago
I knew it!! I was wondering why the highway looked so familiar. This was in Greenwich, CT, right?
Talent2008 1 year ago
"oh my GAWD" <-- he shit himself. SEE ONE OF THESE AT A DEALERSHIP OR SOMETHING IF YOU CAN, SO WORTH IT!
admx94 1 year ago
is this the owner of high torque's veyron?
Godeepgts11 1 year ago
Hmm this is in New York (judging by the sign). Come up to New Hampshire!
DudesaidMIKE 1 year ago
0:14 american porn
ArinOngunTV 1 year ago 38
it didn't look like you went that fast.
iamhelix 1 year ago
my personal opinion is this is one hell of a supercar, ruined by people like simon cowell who dont know or care about anything to do with cars but buy it anyway to show off.
FUCK202 1 year ago
Dude, if you put effects while making this video, you could make it look like you're going into hyperdrive or whatever its called in starwars
kvnelvn 1 year ago
@kvnelvn ITS A TRAP!
Slywooftwo 1 year ago
@Slywooftwo huh?
kvnelvn 1 year ago
If you flor this all the way to the floor... lets see you have a 26 gallon tank and you run out dead in 12 minutes.. how gay is that!
AceMaxAceMax2 1 year ago
@AceMaxAceMax2 only when your tank is half empty. ;)
deepsinK 1 year ago
@AceMaxAceMax2 It's not gay...that just means the bugatti is one hell of a supercar
kvnelvn 1 year ago
U sir owe me a new underwear !!!!
sarwar123ify 1 year ago
Upstate NY. Wonder how those state troopers would treat you up there. Real bottom feeders LOL. Be safe and sick car!
westy44cal 1 year ago
that was boring
mysuperliam 1 year ago
i have a iced out rolex andim very proud of it
netwt1oz 1 year ago
there is no other car that can be compared with veyron!
McL4ren 1 year ago
The veyron is godly. But i cant understand anyone that would pay that much money for a car.
daniel0164 1 year ago
@daniel0164
That is like asking why someone speak a half million on a watch.
Tippotipo 1 year ago
@Tippotipo exactly
daniel0164 1 year ago
I think people who say the engine is capable of 3000hp it probably has the potential to do 3000hp. Just no one has the balls to increase boost and tune their bugatti to 3000hp. If I have 50 million dollars to spend I would buy 2 and do 3000hp on one just to see if it can do 3000hp.
AntDX316 1 year ago
thats not an accelerator pedal, thats more like a warp drive pedal!
aaronchungrulez 1 year ago 9
that wasnt a launch.
ScottishScoobs 1 year ago
slow shit
Peonattack 1 year ago
@Peonattack lol actually fastest in world 0-62 in 2.5 sec
JuggernautRecords 1 year ago
@JuggernautRecords
It wasnt full acceleration i think
Peonattack 1 year ago
@JuggernautRecords Wrong 0-62 in 1 sec.
MrLoooooooo 1 year ago
I always wonder how the acceleration of the Veyron compares to my GSXR750. I.e. acceleration on the bike is far above the "laugh out loud" enjoyment type of acceleration, it is just outright scary in 1st and 2nd. I wonder if the acceleration of the Veyron would impress bike riders. I believe 0-100 or 0-120 mph times of the GSXR are about with in 0.5 s of the Veyron. Can any one hazard a guess how different Veyron's acceleration would "feel"?
gold333 1 year ago
Just to think us Americans had nothing to do with the development of this car! :-D America can't make cars like this and never will, Coz were stupid... period!! However money will allow us Americans to buy this car! Such a shame... All show but no go thats us.......
neil9443 1 year ago 2
@neil9443 ur an idiot the ssc ultimate aero is the fastest car in the world faster than a bugatti and its an american car so ur dumb american cars are the best in the world
dalejonessexybeast 1 year ago
@dalejonessexybeast ultimate aero is the fastest, but in terms of luxury, performance, driveability, nothing touches this thing. name another automatic that can do 250+ STOCK and still comfortably putter around the city in traffic. it terminates all discussions and doubts about what is and isn't possible
DAILL2DEF 1 year ago 2
@DAILL2DEF well you go ahead and waiste a million dollars on this car but i would rather have one that i could have more fun in that cost way less
dalejonessexybeast 1 year ago
@DAILL2DEF There is new veyron coming out, top speed is 431km/h so it beats aero
bmwseries3 1 year ago
@bmwseries3
The supersport 268 mph/431 kmph crazy I want to get one. well I'll have to work hard and get lucky.
magnum4magnets82 1 year ago
@magnum4magnets82 or save up all our money and get it when you about 90
bmwseries3 1 year ago
@bmwseries3
No I mean like 20's it's a big ambition, but you never no God has gifted me well and I plan on not wasting them.
magnum4magnets82 1 year ago
I dont know why you all continue to argue because NONE of you will ever own a veyron fags
daniel0164 1 year ago
If you have to ask about cost, then you can't afford it.
Besides, it's no where near as expensive as running a long term female.
HolyFuckinShitBatman 1 year ago
haha
memento18poker 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
the reason the owners are so scared is because
1. It costs a million to 2 million to own
2. Cops
3. Amature driving them
4. Eats a lot of fuel but fuel isnt an issue
my uncle owns 2 of these 1 regular and 1 convertible
NewportCoastCA 2 years ago
BS I own all the convertible veyrons atm so he couldnt!!!
Your sir, are a liar.
Bigboomer 1 year ago
BTW, they're "Grand Sport", not convertibles...
Bigboomer 1 year ago
Why are all the owners so scared to drive these cars??????????? "I'll hit the brakes real hard". Yeah, and do you buy new carpet for your home and take your shoes of too? Wouldn't want to get any dirt on it now would we? Every Bugatti Veyron video on YouTube is so weak. I've yet to see any of them do anything so special. Perhaps it was all just a hoax from the magazines, maybe these cars are really slow. Maybe if they get over hundred MPH too many times they fall apart.
SkylarkGSX 2 years ago
The tires are the only street legal in the world certified (for insurnce reasons) for hte speeds it pulls. The tires are apparently around $25,000.
Geez, I wonder why they aren't driven hard. They are trophy pieces. If you own one, most likely you will HAVE another Supercar (Lamborghini, Ferrari, Koenigsegg etc...) which will be more FUN (handling and sports wise) as opposed to the lap of luxury your in with the Bugatti.
Plus, the Ferrari's tires are $1200, not $25k.
Bigboomer 2 years ago
2,500.00 not 25,000
hockeyprep22 1 year ago
or they cost so much and don't want to smash them, by they way your talking you would have it wrapped around a tree first day
tkdman9 2 years ago
@tkdman9 Yeah, I'd hate to buy a car that cost too much to drive. LoL. So what you're saying I guess then is that you pay 2,000,000.00 dollars for a car that goes 250 MPH, but only drive it to about 100 in which case I can drive my girlfriend's Corrolla faster and have never been around a telephone pole? All's I'm saying is that if you're going to drive like a granny then you can do it for much less. Pretty pricey ornament don't you think?
SkylarkGSX 2 years ago
ah i see what you are saying, its mainly just a pussy magnetic car haha, nothing says "i've made it" then a bugatti lol
tkdman9 2 years ago
@tkdman9 Really my whole point to all this was just trying to egg on one of those Veyron owners out there, hoping they'll read my comment and then decide to give us a better "test drive" if you know what I mean? HeHe!
SkylarkGSX 2 years ago
i see what ya saying haha sorry for ruining it
tkdman9 2 years ago
Ignorance is always fun on youtube! First of the Bugatti Veyron cost $1M-$2.2M which in its self is impressive. Then you have to pay $21,000 for a routine check up. Then $38,000 to change tires (which needs to be done every few thousand kilometers). Then $46,000 every fourth tire change to get your tires x-rayed. So lets say you drove this every day (12,000 miles/year). So that is approximately $462,000 per year for routine basics. So next time you say why don't they drive them... think!
MOAIAngel 2 years ago
If ignorance was bliss Youtube would be an orgasm.
Bigboomer 1 year ago 12
its funny how much dumb shit is said in these comments. read through them its fucking hilarious.
and daniel2001 what the fuck are you smokeing bro nothin you say makes any sence
u said shit like lambos look bonkers
and you compare the bugatti to an Audi tt
ur a fucking retard
durryduz 2 years ago 4
dude that shit made me laugh my ass off!! kudos to you for telling that stupid bitch whats up, and if i ever heard someone refer to something as bonkers id probably slap the mother fucker lol.
ninjaturtlebirdz 2 years ago 2
For all the haters out there. Motor trend said that the Veyron actually could produce 3000 horses. However 2000 of those are invariably lost through the massive heat that the engine produces. So at the crank, it comes out to be 1001.
Mu4dD1b15 2 years ago
That is completely false. Do not ever try to make bullshit like that up. No matter how well you cool the engine, the power will always be around 1001ps.
iXetsuei 2 years ago
Acutally, that's the problem. You see, the 1001hp are produced directly by the engine.What Motor trend said is that if Bugatti's engineers could eficiently use the energy disipated through heat, instead of just cooling it away, they'd have a 3k HP engine. Simple as that. It's physics, energy is the same, no matter if it's electric, thermal, nuclear...Ps sry for my bad english :).
Skandalf 2 years ago 58
Yes, but you could do that with ANY engine is the point. Energy will always be lost by heat, and unless we find a way to turn that heat back into energy it's gone for good. So it's not even worth mentioning the point. If a Prius engine didn't lose energy from heat, it would make 200hp+. But does anyone ever bother to mention that? No, because it's stupid as hell.
iXetsuei 2 years ago 3
Okay, you go invest around a half, to a full billion dollars and design the technology, then make is small enough and light enough to be efficent in a automobile.
You'll make a lot of money, just good luck getting the starting capital.
Bigboomer 2 years ago
@Skandalf they actually can make it quicker, its has the ability to go i think up to aroun 265 mph (dont quote me on the number) but its starts to become uncontrollable so i think they probably should just leave it at 1001.
dividad1 1 year ago
@Skandalf imagine if they solved the heat problem and they sold it making 3k hp.
8==========>----->
VivaLaNick335 1 year ago
@Skandalf I wonder why they can't add another cylinder in the same block and use it like a steam engine, i mean 2k hp of heat only...
NoiteraD 1 year ago
@Skandalf Then again 3k horsepower would pretty much destroy the car, they have to limit it or else the driver would die.
HateWhatISee 1 year ago
@Skandalf Problem is, even the most efficient internal combustion engines (extremely large container ship engines) are only about 50% efficient, the rest is heat.
NotYour94Ranger 1 year ago
@Skandalf you trust motor trend?
jdailey19 9 months ago
@Skandalf Yeah sure, but that's not realistic, the engine will literally melt itself if it wasn't cooled.
jaffey2006 9 months ago
@Skandalf
so we should make it half steam engine?
adventuresofwings 8 months ago
@Skandalf
the problem with 3k horsepower is just that they would literally tear any chassis apart :D
bassmajor 7 months ago
@Skandalf So your saying they have 4 turbochargers in there for 0 HP? ok :)
ErnieL23 7 months ago
@Skandalf yea cept the idiots that made it build a 16 cylinder quad turbo engine that only produces 1000HP.. what a joke... i can do that with twin turbos and a 5.0L V8
xmodrock 7 months ago
@xmodrock
Big difference is that tuned twin turbo 5.0L V8 engine is more stressed than a quad turbo W16 engine. The latter is more advanced and built for torque which explain its low rev. It can easily output more but needs to follow industry emission standard.
Tippotipo 6 months ago
@Tippotipo i hate emission standards.. make everything more difficult
xmodrock 6 months ago
@xmodrock yes as someone else said, its just easier and has less stress on the engine therefore making it more reliable. its possible to get 1000 bhp from 2.0 4 cyl turbos, but most of the time they will be catastrophically unreliable
FUCK202 6 months ago
@FUCK202 so a W engine is more reliable .... yea ok
xmodrock 6 months ago
@xmodrock its more reliable to produce 1000 bhp that a 4 pot engine.
FUCK202 6 months ago
@FUCK202 its got 4 turbos and 16 cylinders.. more shit to break
xmodrock 6 months ago
@xmodrock not to mention, 10 radiators! Of course people who owns these can afford to drop a new W16 in whenever they're due for an oil change.
wetpixels 6 months ago
@wetpixels haha!
FUCK202 6 months ago
@xmodrock true, but it still can handle 1000bhp better than a smaller engine.
FUCK202 6 months ago
@FUCK202 still coulda done it with only 2 turbos
xmodrock 6 months ago
@xmodrock again, 2 bigger turbos with more strain on them.
FUCK202 6 months ago
@FUCK202 better tuning better cams and so on.. ;-) then less strain on bigger turbos.. the engine is huge.. its the same size as the zues camaro 707 CI V8 that makes 1200HP N/A... why does this car need turbos at all?
xmodrock 6 months ago
@xmodrock its also the same size as a dodge viper, which in its most expensive specification, produces 600bhp. im guessing when you quad turbo that it will produce around 1000bhp. i think Volkswagen could have got more out of the engine. as you say, that camaro has 1200bhp. they must have had a reason not to get more from it. the only one i can think of is to improve reliability or maybe refinement - because that interior of the veyron is luxurious. it could be a daily car if your rich enough
FUCK202 6 months ago
@FUCK202 true... viper is a disappointment too.. perhaps its all emissions BS?
xmodrock 6 months ago
@xmodrock could be, i've heard that somewhere too
FUCK202 6 months ago
@FUCK202 eehhh fuck emissions
xmodrock 6 months ago
@FUCK202 youre completely off on that viper estimation lmao a 600hp viper could easily do 1500hp+ with only 2 turbos (doesnt need 4 to do over 1000). its all about reliability...sure they couldve put a 3L twin turbo V6 with 1000hp but you wouldnt be able to push it to its limits everyday without a mechanics crew behind you. W16 with 4 turbos sounds like overkill but that means less strain on the engine and turbos.
BoredLikeHelI 5 months ago
@BoredLikeHelI allright, i'm not an professionally trained estimator of quad turbocharging a dodge viper acr like you then. and the second half of that comment just agreed with everything i have been saying
FUCK202 5 months ago
@FUCK202 im not a pro either its just common sense...when theres 1200hp single turbo supras out there
and i didnt read your whole discussion just that one comment
BoredLikeHelI 5 months ago
@BoredLikeHelI *with a power curve not even the best drag racers can tame*
fergus1494 5 months ago
@BoredLikeHelI well...you agreed with me
FUCK202 5 months ago
@FUCK202 Dude has got a point. A specific amount of energy, thus power, comes from burning a specific volume of gasoline with a specific volume of air (well, oxygen) at a specific rate (time), right? That pressure, if spread over larger engine volume, WILL be lower, thus creating less strain on the mechanics (mainly pistons and head gasket) of the engine. Of course, there is a million ways around this, which is what tunning companies do. I'm just saying he had a valid point. Cheerz.
TheRadiastral 5 months ago
@TheRadiastral what are you people doing here? i've been saying this all along, and then every now and then get get a reply like yours telling me that im wrong, but then you go and repeat what i said in the first place!! DUDE HAS GOT A POINT, BUT ITS THE SAME ONE AS MINE!
FUCK202 5 months ago
@FUCK202 No need to get emotional. I haven't read the WHOLE thread, only the last few pages of comments, you could very well have said exactly that, I haven't noticed. Nowhere did I suggest you're wrong. Let me do you justice and say YOU've got a point too! Peace, eh?
TheRadiastral 5 months ago
@TheRadiastral my last comment was 'well..you agreed with me'...you didnt need to read back more than one page, and the one before that was probably back 1 page and says 'the second half of that comment just agreed with evertything i have been saying. 2 people have now repeated exactly the same thing to me and its fucking annoying. can you buy peace of ebay?
FUCK202 5 months ago
Comment removed
fzsheikh 6 months ago
Finally, somebody who understands stuff correctly...:).
Skandalf 2 years ago
NICE EGNINE NOISE
MrGhetto123 2 years ago
To further elaborate, this is also why two stroke engines usually have no more than two cylinders and four stroke engines usually have more than four cylinders. The engines with 2 or less cylinders need to make power more of the time so they use two stroke. Engines with 4+ cylinders can use four stroke because they're making power all of the time. Four stroke engines are also smoother, and do not need to operate on as many RPM.
iXetsuei 2 years ago
The engine produces 987hp/1001ps at the flywheel. Those are the official figures from Volkswagen themselves. If you honestly think it's putting out 3000hp at the crank, you're fucking retarded. Four stroke gasoline engines aren't "one quarter efficient", they make power a fourth of the time because of the stroke cycle. Two stroke engines make power half the time. It doesn't change how much power the engine makes, but how frequently it is produced.
iXetsuei 2 years ago
Urban Dictionary
Hard Time: When you take a big shit. A word used instead of saying "I'm going to blast a deuce."
Example:
Kris: "Yo I just did some hard time!"
Adam: "Open the window... damn"
theannoyingdogpoo 2 years ago
Urban Dictionary: turdholder
Example:
Andrea felt something brewing and bubbling in her turdholder and knew she would probably be spending a lengthy stint ass painting the Starbucks bathroom.
theannoyingdogpoo 2 years ago
I believe it's 3000hp, but most of that is lost at clutch or something
spluesh 2 years ago
Nope, 1000hp at the crank, 800 and something at the wheels, still fucking fast though.
Limerick91 2 years ago
Comment removed
ProGAMER24 2 years ago
"According to Volkswagen (and approved by TÜV Süddeutschland), the final production Veyron engine produces 1,001 PS (736 kW; 987 hp)"
^ Know your shit first.
Limerick91 2 years ago
Comment removed
ProGAMER24 2 years ago
Yes i do, it says the "engine" produces 987 hp. Being Bhp, whatever the whp is, it has to be less than the bhp, how the fuck can the engine produce 987hp and the horsepower at the wheels be more?
Stop talking shit.
Limerick91 2 years ago
accually bugatti themselves claim every veyron does between 1020-1050 hp they under claim them for some reason. they dyno every car.
zenithskull 2 years ago 43
This has been flagged as spam show
well normal veyron (becouse of the gt version that got 1350 hp
patko1610 2 years ago
@zenithskull they underclaim for insurance the less hp you claim the cheaper its already like 5000 a month
jmoney321123 1 year ago
@zenithskull they underclaim it because the goal was to get 1001 hp ... but they got more...
bradajr 1 year ago
@zenithskull they do it so it looks more impressive to you, so in other words they get a 1001hp car to accel as fast as a 1050hp car. WO how'd they do that... ha well they lied lol
gittyupalice96 11 months ago
@gittyupalice96 The new veyrons actually put out 1200 hp.
morri908 10 months ago
@morri908 That would be the super sport. At a cost of over $700k more than the "standard" Bugatti Veyron. The original still makes 1001hp. I, personally, would never dump that kind of cash into something with speed you will never be able to use, ever.
1ightweightSukka 10 months ago
@1ightweightSukka Thaz why i said "new veyrons" but still.. soo much money for an ugly car. lol.
morri908 10 months ago
@morri908 IKR? I personally like the even MORE rare and less heard of cars. Koenigsegg happens to be my favorite, perosnally.
1ightweightSukka 10 months ago
@1ightweightSukka Koenigseggs are very nice.. I don't know if i'd ever be able to afford a supercar like those, so i stay closer to reality. Like 'vettes, Ferraris, Lambo.. stuff like that..
morri908 10 months ago
@morri908 Well shit, I know I'll probably never be able to afford one, it's all dreaming as far as I'm concerned. Personally, I'd like to drive one almost more than own one. Seems like an awful lot of responsibility to carry. They are just soooooo sexy. love love love Koenigseggs. LOL, Ferraris and Lambos are reality?? I'll take my Boss Mustang and get outta town, lol. They pretty nice too. As for Vettes, they got their quarks and aren't for me, but still great cars.
1ightweightSukka 10 months ago
@1ightweightSukka I didn't mean vettes specifically. but vettes vipers and the new boss 302 stang (my new "in my eventual pricerange" dream car) But yeah, those supercars have super pricetags, especially for upkeep.
morri908 10 months ago
@1ightweightSukka
I don't know how much they cost elsewhere to rent, but in the UK they can be rented from about £16,000 ($25,000) a day or £45,000 for a weekend. Still very expensive, but perhaps a gift to yourself with some windfall cash.
theporksicle 7 months ago
@zenithskull That tends to be the trend now days. I would like to say it's for insurance purposes, but at 1001hp and >$1.5 Million, I'm not sure underrating would do anything. The new Ford 5.0 produces usually about 440hp from the factory, with a claimed 412hp on premium.
1ightweightSukka 10 months ago
its not 3000hp, yes bi!!!!
Its only 1001hp!!
ijenkins4 2 years ago
you are correct 3000 at the crank and 1000 on the road the rest is lost in heat
i dont know what the fuck the rest of these idiots are saying...
nazc0 2 years ago
lol 3000hp?? just by saying that you must really know shit :P
StefanSu91 2 years ago