Added: 1 year ago
From: stonewalluk
Views: 47,766
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (311)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • voted for section 28.

  • He hasn't written this, and I don't think I am the only one who feels he doesn't mean it. Even though things written by the Daily Mail claiming David said things as far as homosexual kisses before 9 are regarded might not be true it doesn't change the fact he once supported the notion that gay people should not marry. David is nothing more than a typical Tory, and it's more likely than not he is homophobic. He can't even utter the world gay, let alone accept the fact people are homosexual.

  • Nonsense!

    

  • Why don't you all stop hating on Cameron eh? He just doesn't gay bullying and separation of Homo/Hetero-Sexuals rights! Just to make them equal. Why even watch the video then hate on it afterwards? People can be as stupid as Homo-phobe sometimes.

  • ...Hang on David most of these reforms were made under Labour's period in officer and did not your party oppose most of them ?

  • @sandmansam1965 Most changes were made because the European courts ordered them to be. For example, Labour didn't want gays in the armed forces, so our donations to Stonewall had to be used to take them to court. It's only because European law comes before British that we won - no thx to Labour. A minority of tories opposed the equality reforms.

    Dont believe all the myths that go round!

  • @sandmansam1965 It was the tories Edwina Currie who set the 'age of consent' ball rolling, bt unfortunately only got it reduced to 18. Labour didnt have any plans to equalise it until then. Even Thatcher voted for decriminalisation in '67.

  • @sandmansam1965 [Remember to start at the bottom and work up, to read all my comments.]

    Section 28 was misguided, and came abt thru that generation simply not understanding the difference between equality for ppl who were already gay and 'turning' ppl gay. And it was a backlash against the perceived xtremism of Ken Livingstone. As it happened, civil servants deliberately wrote the legislation in such a way that it couldnt be enacted - so no one could be prosecuted.

  • Are you fucking kidding me?

  • 'this is not the sort of country where we label people for being different'

    erm, yes, it is

  • What a load of crap. It's essentially like "I'm great, I even allowed the gays to get legally recognised as partners. No tax breaks though, that's only for good old heterosexual people".

  • @reallyhughish There are tax breaks: hmrc.gov.uk/leaflets/Pride1.pd­f

    Dont believe all the myths that go round!

  • Comment removed

  • @RichardElden I think Cameron's the biggest pervert here

  • Lost my very last shred of respect for David Cameron.

  • @RichardElden I will grant you that the original meaning of the word gay was happiness, however words change meaning all the time. The word gay is now more commonly associated with homosexual men, or very occassionally homosexual women. The word gay is also used as an insult to imply something is stupid. I can also agree with you that gay does not automatically equate to sodomy. Sodomy is a physical act, my reference to homosexuality is in a broader sense of homosexual relationships,not just sex

  • Dear David,

    If you are against bullying for being gay, then why are you banning same-sex kisses on TV until after 9pm.

    Sincerely, the UK.

  • @f33ee There are some gullible ppl around here. Dont believe all the myths that go round! That rumour was made up by the homophobic Daily Mail when they reported on an inquiry into TV indecency. When you read "A source close to the inquiry said" - instead of the name of the person, you should know its made up. dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1­382376/Indecent-lesbian-kiss-s­cenes-face-watershed-crackdown­.html

  • @f33ee Instead, read/watch reputable media, like the BBC: bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/13427727. Research the truth before being gullible! And note this was May 11, and gay kissing hasnt been banned.

  • This Jew.

  • @martynblackburn1977 No, C of E.

  • @Tastylicious Culturally CofE but still Jew.

  • @martynblackburn1977 Never heard of Cameron being jewish - where did you hear this? Whats its relevance anyway?

  • @Tastylicious He's a descendent of William IV. Tracing back William's ancestry goes back to Jewish aristocracy, to Elijah Levita.

  • @martynblackburn1977 @martynblackburn1977 @martynblackburn1977 en.wik i pedia .org/wiki i/David_Cameron: "Among Cameron's ancestors is King William IV, who is his 5-times great-grandfather". A persons only considered of jewish race thru the mothers bloodline - and in terms of practicing religion, he's only C of E.

    I dont understand the relevance of this, anyway?

  • Insanekid95 needs to get his/her facts right. David Cameron did not say anything of the sought. The Daily Mail making rubbish up again.

  • How can I have faith in what Cameron tells us when the number of unemployed is increasing directly from the policies which he is pushing

  • it is very true what he says - if you are in anyway feeling down because of who you are or having to take shit - remember that help is always always always there for U - but getting back to the Thatcher clown - a Conservative who's party introduced Clause 28 -

    be Proud of who you are - you are an amazing person - just please remember to never vote Conservative -

  • @anthonynewsome See my 3 posts above, in response to sandmansam1965.

  • 1:13 Rule britannia!

  • @insanekid95 He supports Same-sex marriage.

  • hold on a second. Isn't this the same guy who supported section 28?

  • @BrainChild42 He's made up for it in my book: independent.co.uk/news/uk/poli­tics/government-move-to-legisl­ate-samesex-marriage-2356475.h­tml

  • @BrainChild42 Hold on a second, isn't this the same guy who wasn't an MP when section 28 went through the House?

  • @BrainChild42 No - he wasnt an MP at the time. In 2009, he formally apologised for his party introducing the law, stating that it was a mistake and had been offensive to gay people. He had been in support of it at the time, bt I dont think you should ever knock someone who accepts their mistakes and shows it in their actions.

  • how stupid are you David Cameron?

    Irresponsible! (Mind Control.)

  • DAVID CAMERON, YOU DICK.

  • Psh, this is ridiculous. What a joke coming from him, as if he's ever had problems on that front. All a bit cynical coming from a Tory, methinks.

  • Watching this after several videos of lesbians/gays supporting this campaign, I thought I was in for a shock...

  • Hold on David these legal reforms all came in during Labour's 11 years in power

    

  • Thank you David Cameron, I am very proud of you. I speak as the mother of a beautiful boy who lost his life last year to bullying because of his perceived sexuality.  No one should ever have to suffer this pain and we have started Friends of Dom Crouch against Bullying to raise awareness and prevent further lives from being lost in this dreadful way.

  • @CrouchPaola

    I'm so sorry for you loss. I know how hard bullying because of sexuality can be <3 stay strong for your boy xx

  • Oh Fuck off. Working hard my arse, he has no idea what it's like in normal schools with the actual bullying.

  • @GearsofHaloWarfare As in all areas of govt, a PM has education advisors representing all aspects of school life.

  • @Tastylicious And I wonder how many of those went to a normal school.

  • @GearsofHaloWarfare A PMs advisors - whichever party he's from - are the best xperts in their field who want to work in the public sector. Theyre usually ppl w direct previous xperience, as former teachers, examiners etc. Because most schools are state schools, xperience in that area qualifies them better to be advisors.

  • @GearsofHaloWarfare So, in answer, the school they attended only matters insofar as what they learnt before employment and the standards to which they aspire, for most of their xperience is in 'normal' schools as you call them (theyre all normal, tho :-s)

  • Nuke Britain today!

  • We'd nuke you first no contest.

  • Well it was labour that brought in all those laws he is talking about.... I hope he believes and deliversin what he says... I have my doubts.

  • i hate it when people read from a Teleprompter, someone who's not in that position saying 'it's ok', doesn't have the same effect.

  • 'britain is a tolerant place, this is not the sort of country where we label people for being different' UH YES IT IS. I think he missed the point of this campaign. its not to defend britain. he is such a hypocrite. Ok, fair enough, make thie video to show your support. But dont just do it if you dont truly believe it. I dont think he truly believes it. Compare this to the Obama video and its a joke.

  • @nonsensepoopypants Youve not said anything to back up your views..

  • this guy is a hypocritical cunt.

  • 'cause this wasn't scripted or anything....

  • @Iamawsomelike Every speech or interview of a politician is scripted. And nearly everything you see on TV. If you want to come across well, you have to plan what you say.

  • Does anyone else think that this is like an old educational video you might watch at school

  • @Z5V2 oh it so is!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The man who said lady thatcher is an icon, the same b*tch who brought us section 28!!!!

  • fuck you you asshole you are a lieing heep of scum let the teachers teach gays ok in schools agean then maby ill not hate you and take this back but till the plz post this to all other vids of this guy supporting gay anything let us know who he realy is

  • @zdtfdfhgjk I take it you havent had much of a schooling due to bullying. Sorry to hear that. Ive made sense of your post as best I can, tho.

    Teachers can teach abt gay issues again - the law against it was scrapped a long time ago - so hows he lying?

  • the uk diverse? diverse my homosexual arse

  • i hate david cameron ! but this is the only video i will like with him in it .

  • Fair play to him for making this video. but it's full of bull, just like him

  • In 2003, David Cameron voted in favour of a(n unsuccessful) Conservative amendment to the Local Government Act that would have effectively reinstated Section 28. The Conservative frontbench granted its backbenchers a free vote. But he's right about one thing: it will get better - when people like him are no longer at the heart of the political process.

  • David Cameron's party brought in Section 28, which banned the teaching of homosexuality in schools and portrayed it as being "abnormal".

    He himself repeatedly attacked opposition plans to remove it in 2000.

    The Tories are homophobic to their core. Don't believe a word he says otherwise.

  • Hippocrit he really needs to rethink what he says before he says it, okay so maybe he really does want to stop homophobic bullying but same sex cant kiss on tv before 9pm!

  • @SCOTTISHSOULANDHEART Dont believe trashy tabloids! See my reply to f33ee, above.

  • Have you noticed that throughout this video he made just two references to homosexuality. He mentioned same sex civil partnerships and homophobia. This man who runs the country can't even bring himself to say the word gay. A very contrived video and not words that I can believe from him.

  • @grimreaper636 Oh so you want our Prime Minister to publish a video in which he says "So what if you're gay?" No, you want it formally proposed to you, else he'd be told off for using the word 'gay' in an offensive way.

  • @thisgirlcharli No I want him to stop pretending he cares when him and his party have a long history of oppressing the LGBT community. I won't go into my history but I know what isolation and intolerance can do to those who already feel ashamed. I want him to put his money where his mouth is and follow through on the pro gay speeches.

  • What a joke. This guy just announced that he wants to prevent gay kisses from being seen on TV before 9:00 pm, saying that it will be harmful for young children to see, even though he's fine with straight kisses before 9:00.

  • @Insanekid95 You know, he's the Prime Minister, you can't just say that he alone is saying that it can be harmful for young children, you need to realise there are hundreds of people behind him telling him what to say, they have to deal with complaints from the public, the public is a joke, the viewers that complain, they are the problem, if people all had the correct mentality then the Government wouldn't have to contradict themselves so much

  • @HMSDaring1 What about integrity, or saying what he believes?

  • @Insanekid95 so ? he did the right thing..

  • @Insanekid95 He never actually said that. Don't believe everything you read in the Daily Mail.

  • @Insanekid95 Liar.

    SOURCE: "David Cameron 'does not want' gay kissing ban on TV" Google THAT - first link should be a BBC article. YT won't let me post a hyperlink.

    Get your facts right.

  • @Insanekid95 No he hasnt.. See my reply to the post of f33ee, I think on the last page.

    Dont believe trash like the Daily Mail!

  • He is such a dick

  • Why is he using this video to try and make the UK look better than America?

  • The only reason he's even spoken out like this is to keep the voters on his side! He's done nothing to help any of us.

  • David Cameron has done NOTHING for LGBT rights!

    He voted NO to lesbian couples having a fathers name stricken off the birth certificate, even if he was a doner!

    He voted YES on Proposition 28 which would ban teaching of same-sexuality in schools which could lead to an extremely confused generation of teenagers and increased homophobic bullying.

  • "britain is a diverse, open, tolerant place" .... really?!, is that why your trying to ban gay kissing before 9. yep that sound really diverse, open and tolerant!!

    what hes really saying is "to all the gay comunity, i dont really care about you just going to pretend i do so Please vote for me"...........

    "and then im just gna throw it back in your faces anyway"

    AHHH hes the most hypocritical person ever! Cant stand him!

  • It seems more a political campaign to win gay people votes. There are many things that UK should change, like this stupid ban of gay kisses on TV. I find David Cameron's attitude hypocritical. Maybe next time, prime minister

  • What an asshole

  • and now he wants to ban gay kissing on TV, that just stupid... but hey, he's a politician

  • He does this video, and then goes and supports a gay kiss ban on TV. I really hate this man.

  • I appreciate the prime minister's message, but there's one problem: what if no one does care about you? What would the victim do if his/her parents were also homophobic?

  • Dear Mr Cameron,

    As a conservative, a member of a party that has traditionally opposed progressive measures on gay rights, its deeply wrong for you to appropriate this issue. Have you even heard of Dan Savage? Regardless, the best thing you could do in this situation is to apologize for your party's record on this matter. Also, I wonder what Anne Widdecome feels about this? The day the conservatives champion gay rights during an election year is the day I will listen to what you have to say

  • David Cameron doesn't give a shit about gay rights. He supported the act banning the teaching of homosexuality in schools and against trans and gay issues, he's jumping on a bandwagon to gain publicity and draw away from the public sector cuts, which is what all politicians do fair enough, but not when it sends such a terribly message to people who need to feel supported. This message should be sincere, not a publicity stunt.

  • Bravo! Spoken from the heart, Kudos!

  • The man who said multiculturalism has failed is telling people they can be who they want to be. Brilliant.

  • He's the boss and hes made it clear theres no place in UK for homophobic nonsense

  • but overall, britain is a place where you can be who you want to be. So you can all stop worrying about the defense of marriage act and move over here. (pleasedon'tkillme.)

  • If only he was being sincere. What a hypocritcal liar. Claiming to have a certain opinion to get votes/popularity...and to fit in.

  • David Cameron is a hypocrite. I hate that he's acting like he has an opinion on this subject, when it has been shown before that he clearly doesn't.

  • @LolaGabriella sorry, wheres the hypocrisy here? to you this he's shouting "faggot" at some kid as soon as the camera turns off?

  • @cfcolly No not at all, but search "David Cameron losing the plot in Gay Times interview". He clearly doesn't have a strong opinion on the subject so I don't feel that he should be commenting on it. Just my opinion. Besides my friend felt insulted by him going on about how it gets better when how the hell would he know, whilst my friend has been bullied for being gay for years. But that's just how I feel. We're all entitled our own opinions.

  • where is the human rights here i like yu to print attached email and to handle it to the queen i believed she is angel, i live in australia i sent her email before to save my life but as i see she told the australian government leave steve to kill me by radiation i like to know since when the queen give instruction to kill people or to allow anyone to use radiation to kill saying it is investigation i like to know why the queen trying to protect criminal why she wants him to kill me

    why read

  • Well Cameron should know what its like to being bullied. This is the man ( wimp) who hasn't got the guts to explain why he let Obama trade our nuclear secrets to the Russians this week as reported in the Daily Telegraph.

  • I'm not sure why we have to compare which leader's It Gets Better speech is better. Can anyone really match Obama's oratory skills anyway? The fact is it's wonderful that Cameron is doing this. All leaders and important figures should be putting out messages such as these.

  • TRAITOR

  • It's great the David Cameron has done SOMETHING, and I appreciate the we have all these rights, but (especially for teenagers like me who won't have access those rights until we're an adult) things won't get better today. It's not as if it's just a mentality that we have that people are discriminating against and bullying us, they actually are. In my experience, Britain is no where near as accepting as he makes out, and it won't be overnight. It gets better today if they help us today.

  • @kneesocksNlollypops

    What are you whinging about?! Nobody is bullying you.....it is you who are expecting to be treated as superior to everybody else....when you are not. Lots of people get bullied.....and no one gives a dam about them. So stop crying about yourself.....and look after others....not just looking for attention for yourself. CATHOLIC STATE please!

  • @amaqula kneesocksNlolypops said absolutely nothing about wanting to be treated superiorly. "lots of people get bullied and no one gives a damn about them"? The point she was trying to make was that they fucking well should. "look after others"? Who should we be looking after, may i ask? you have absolutely no idea if she's involved in charities or anything involving looking after people, nor the severity of the bullying she is receiving. Stop dominating the comments with pathetic assumptions.

  • fuck this shit country

  • I originally supported this speech, and I still admire Mr Cameron for giving such a supportive message to LGBT people. However, I've since seen President Obama's message, published a month earlier, and it's so much more heartfelt. It doesn't cite recent policy, as Mr Cameron does as some kind of government defence. Instead it gives an impassioned account of a man who felt different, and therefore ashamed. Mr Obama related to others; Mr Cameron tries admirably, but does not.

  • ahaha what gets me is god created all of us in his own image so if people are gay god made um that way so its like he's condeming people to hell b4 there even born that seems fair not, as for bullying at schools i never really experience it nor did i see it going on around me how ever i aint gulable and i know it gos on and it needs sorting out.

  • As much as I hate you David, knowing that you probally got told to say this by other MPs, it's great your doing SOMETHING. I don't think I've ever had a school day where I havn't heard a form of homophobic bullying used in a negative way towards somebody depsite the fact if their LGB or not. People get brainwashed into thinking it's acceptable when it cleary isn't. I hope things change, otherwise it's just another fact about how cruel this race really is.

  • Now, if I weren't the cynical, misanthropic, jerkass bastard that I am; I would believe that he was being genuine, but this IS David Cameron we're talking - the man noted for saying that he'll grant full marriage rights to same-sex couples then retracting it last may because sex couples have it perfectly fine. He's a turncoat tory wanker and his lapdog Clegg is no better.

  • Disgusting bastard, i'm so very happy i never voted for him, or his hypocrite side kick.

  • I've never laughed so hard than I have at all the gay "it gets better videos"...entertaining (and gay) as hell!

  • Haha he kinda bashed the USA. He's saying how British soldiers can be gay. Our country is working on it.

  • Support him.

  • Ooops. Support him. We would take him onboard anytime.

  • Ra ra for a nice normal PM. We have a nutcase that spends trillions on roads to no where . No brains whatsoever. Be happy for have a smart PM. He is a winner. Supply him.

  • God Bless David Cameron. He is the best.

  • Fat chance. Welcome to the UK enslavement program. Cameron's New World Order.

  • I'm trying to hold judgment on Cameron, but he's not making it easy. It Gets Better is supposed to be about giving a message of support and encouragement to LGBT kids, not about political agendas.

    I think it's really good that David Cameron is showing his support for this, but I do think he needs to work on the focus a little bit.

  • Cameron, if you believed in tackling homophobic bullying in schools why did you vote for Section 28, legally gagging teachers from talking about homophobic bullying when I was in school?

  • It doesn't matter if he doesn't mean a word. It matters that the message reaches those who need to hear it, and those who question his motives or sincerity are undermining the effort and potentially discouraging people who could be helped by this support from receiving it.  Whatever you think of Cameron and the Tories, (and I support neither) this is still a good thing for him to be doing.

  • Comment removed

  • ha ha ha ha ha, i love how a tory who supported section 28 is listing LABOUR legislation (civil partnerships, equality legislation) as a sign of how things have changed!

    Remember Stonewall was a RIOT fought by working class queers.

    Not a party political broadcast for gay businessmen who want to protect their business interests.

  • ha ha ha ha ha, i love how a tory who supported section 28 is listing LABOUR legislation (civil partnerships, equality legislation) as a sign of how things have changed!

    Remember Stonewall was a RIOT fought by working class queers.

    Not a fucking party political broadcast for gay businessmen who want to protect their business interests.

  • 00:15 his body language says otherwise. He is NOT a happy bunny. Don't trust him, he doesn't support gays

  • @amanemanga I don't believe that.  Its weird the UK is jumping on the "It Gets Better Thing" when its an American thing. Conservative in the UK does not mean the same thing as it does in the U.S. I appreciate the country I originally came from.

  • And my other message is, stop relying on unemployment benefits, you lazy sods. I'm cutting them off.

  • This man is a hypocrite. I mean yes he says he's trying but his voting patterns in the past are making it extremely hard to believe that he isn't doing this to gain more support or to make it look like he gives a damn. He's probably been pressured by people and had letters sent to him and good on him for reacting to it but I'm finding it really difficult to believe him.

  • Knowing how this man has voted in the past, and his weak sauce retractions, I have a hard time take his words seriously.

  • I used to think that the UK was one of the most open minded country in Europe but its clearly not. They're still a lot of homophobic person and no gay marriage. So this guy should think twice before saying this

  • @psionycx

    Ha ha....doctrinal purity is truth. You don't mess with Truth....unless you obviously don't have any regard for it. The sign of a savage....CATHOLIC STATE time for me!!

  • @psionycx

    You seem to have conveniently forgotten the abominable extinguishing of Catholics in Britain....and the ethnic cleansing of Catholics in Ireland. Catholics in the UK were virtually wiped out....but you have nothing to say about that! Hypocrite! CATHOLIC STATE coming up!!

  • @psionycx

    There was nothing advanced about it at all. Rome I guess you are talking about was a brute slave owning human sacrificing society....with infanticide legalised. It was barbaric!! Catholic Europe founded and set the modern world in motion and reignited science after Aristotles false theories were banned in the Church run universities. There was a reason the world was Eurocentric .....and it wasn't atheism. CATHOLIC STATE time again.

  • @psionycx

    Catholicism brought civilisation to a barbaric wayward world......and influenced everything from commerce to arts to the sciences. Catholics are the founders and true defenders of the West......without the CATHOLIC STATE....you will be Islamised it...whether you like it or not!! Careful what you wish for! CATHOLIC STATE for me!!!

  • @amaqula Catholicism took the Roman Empire and turned its already flawed laws into deliberately twisted mockeries. It gave slavery an ethnic basis and set back the course of science and thought for a millenium. While I love the mass, don't rewrite history.

    Not that any of this is really relevant as a comment on this video

  • @AdamGillett

    Scientific developement took place within Christendom ONLY......what does that tell you?! And the CATHOLIC STATE forbade slavery which the Romans revelled in. CATHOLIC STATE is the seed of civilisation......and we want one again!

  • @amaqula

    Since when has scientific development stopped?? And last I checked, the Catholic Church isn't exactly a fan of innovation. The Church placed Galileo under house arrest for the rest of his life, simply for saying that he thought the sun, and not earth, was the center of the universe. And it only took them 187 YEARS to admit they were wrong. The Catholic Church isn't an innovator, it's a stagnator, especially when it comes to science and social policy.

  • @AABonine9200

    Actually the Catholic Church fostered the development of science in its Universities and monasteries. Galileo was rightly arrested for teaching Copernican theory as fact....when he couldn't prove it! It was right that he should have been arrested. Atheists can't break through the barriers of physics.....which is why we still have the out dated cars trains and aeroplanes etc. Time to make a move on don't you think!! Why are we waiting........CATHOLIC STATE.....is great!!

  • @amaqula

    If the Church actually knew anything about science it would know that it's very difficult to definitively 'prove' anything. Additionally, if Galileo was unable to 'prove' the heliocentric theory, it is even more unlikely that the Church, or anyone else, was able to 'prove' the Copernican system, especially seeing as it's incorrect. I can't believe you're claiming that a lack of belief in God stifles science, as if becoming Catholic would solve all our problems. Get a life.

  • @AABonine9200

    Sorry....but the Copernican model was proven at a later date. And we actually have photographic evidence to prove it today...if that isn't enough evidence for you....then sorry but it does me. Yes....I loudly proclaim nobody does science like Christians do....history shows it. CATHOLIC STATE.....is great!

  • @amaqula

    I meant that the Church was not able to prove the Ptolemaic system, not the Copernican system. It took them 187 years to say that Galileo was right, long after it had become widely accepted by most scientists. I am well aware that the Earth moves around the sun.

  • @AABonine9200

    The Church is filled with clergy who are not necessarily scientists. It is up to scientists to prove their theories.....and not to declare them true if they have no proof. Galileo didn't do this.....he was a sloppy scientist. And the general public couldn't believed Galileo because he couldn't answer basic questions such as....why no stellar parallax shift if the earth is moving?! Galileo's answers were false...and laughable.  CATHOLIC STATE...is great though.

  • @amaqula If its up to scientitsts to prove their theories, then is it up to Catholics to prove that the both they and the Bible are true?

    In which case, how does Vatican opulence line up with Luke 21:1-4 ?

    (Why wont you answer on your channel?)

  • @psionycx The Catholic Church is also indirectly responsible for the Holocaust. For its entire existence, the CC has done everything it could to demonize the Jews saying Jews were guilty of killing Christ. During and before WWII the CC did virtually nothing to resist the Nazis or speak out against the inhumanity. Even the current Pope has made statements that Jews need to convert to Christianity if they want to be saved. There is no end to their arrogance.

  • Comment removed

  • Yes, publically Obama is far too conservative for me. I suspect, but do not know, Obama has no problem with any gay civil rights including gay's right to marry. I suspect his public statements are just political posturing. But I think he has been very shrewd with the repeal of DADT. When it is repealed this year, there will be little if any backlash within the military. Something of great value.

  • @derekdb2 I

    1. Leviticus 25:44 states that I may possess slaves, both male and

    female, provided they are purchased from neighboring nations. A

    friend of mine claims that this applies to Mexicans, but not

    Canadians. Can you clarify? Why can't I own Canadians?

    2. I would like to sell my daughter into slavery, as sanctioned in

    Exodus 21:7. In this day and age, what do you think would be a

    fair price for her?

  • @psionycx Sorry? I don't really see the relevance? What has Obama got to do with this? Obama has done nothing, Cameron has actively campaigned and voted in parliament against LGBT rights and is now pretending to champion them...

    As for the republicans, in any civilised society they'd be labeled an extremist party and pushed into political obscurity

  • Seems Stonewall censored my comment about Cameron and his cronies' policies concerning the gay community and the absurdity of their decision to let the homophobe do a video for his nice, gleaming profile. Shame.

  • @WhatTheHellAlban what an articulate, well rounded point :) you go, little hater.

  • David Cameron?! Are you serious?? You're using David Cameron, AND THERESA MAY, to support a campaign for equality for the gay community? It's like the US campaign using John McCain. David Cameron votes against every gay rights issue there is, as does Theresa May What kind of message is this sending to gay youths who want to see that they will be treated equality and that there is a brighter future when they are being given that message by people who don't want them to marry or have children?

  • @dramaticafantastica I guess David Cameron thought this was a tourist commercial for the UK

  • Oh look, Stonewall claiming another community campaign as their own...

  • How do you fight bullying?

    “I know that you cannot live on hope alone, but without it, life is not worth living. You have got to give them hope.” Harvey Milk

    YouTube clip: Lance Black's Participation in the Homecoming Project - Live Out Loud