cool! the PS3 has LOW PhysX....:-( Oh well your vid is GREAT!! When she was stomping the chess board and smashing the Hobby Horse it was AWESOME!!!! :-D I wish the graphics WERE like that!
My game (alice madness returns) is REALLY laggy. A lot of people told me about the whole "lower your PhysX" or something.. Can anyone help me out on this?!
People always told Physx is gonna die if OpenGL comes, nothing happened do you know why?cuz PC developer are lazy as hell, they dont care if a new open standard comes out they wont use it. These physx effects are all made by nvidia, nvidia asks the developers to ad them into their games. Free work to make their games look better who would regret? So hate Nvidia and Physx so much you want but without them these games would be normal consoleports.
this game is pretty fun to play and the visuals are beautiful. some later stages are pretty sick though. also the story is a bit too dark for my taste.
@Babelfish112 nver <-- See what i did there? But yeah why would Nvidia give something that they created just to force players into buying their graphics cards, brilliant really. And why not? Just buy an 580 and your'e all set for everything!
I bought this solely for the xbox because the ps3 version was missing textures. I am super bummed that I didn't know about the physx before hand, it makes the game look so much better!
@MadnessZ90 Eh,.. I got an i7 920 @ 4.2Ghz.. And I lag lol.. Everything on high even physx but my AA is off and I only lag in combat :s... Is my CPU not good enough?
@MindSeeR666 if a gtx 590 is too expansive, i let you know that my gtx 560 ti, with lastest physx drivers, runs this game at 60 fps even in combat (only when i use too much the pepper grinder in the same place my fps drops to 30-40).
@MadnessZ90 Hmm, would a 580 be better? I want to go from AMD to nvidia. My 5770 is fine.. I won' be upgrading until next year or maybe the year after.. The drivers seem different and so does the ehh.. nvidias equivalent to CCC. . I may need some help in this. Tehe.
@ZiggyZoko Hmm, i have 6950 and it's more than enough to run any game max at 1080p... some needs to disbe aa but only beast games like metro 2033... i could get a 285 gt as a secondary and use cracked drivers for physx to work on primary amd gpu, for what? More dust and debris? No thx. I also do not want extra noise and power consumption. The thing is, you play for physx way overpriced, there arent that many games to begin with.. so just get 6990 beast and cheap nvidia for secondary physx card.
@ZiggyZoko And buying nvidia isn't worth it, their cards are priced higher, low quality components and the only unique thing is physx. Don't troll me bitches.
@tulp35000 typical ati fan boy... i had an 8800 gts, gtx 260 and now i have a gtx 560 ti, i never had a problem with them and i played the games with max settings. I don't want say that ATI is bad (i had a 5830 too) but we are talking about physx, so if you want play these games with a nice realistic get an Nvdia card or like you said a dedicated physx card.
@tulp35000 My first ATI card fried fast too. Since then I've never purchased one again, but that is simply because I liked my experience with NVIDIA cards, and their Control Panel/Website/Drivers better than ATI. You need to stop whining about a faulty card every brand has them, you should have returned it.
@Ruflcopta Likewise, Ati ftw. Just because you like to pay almost double price for 10-30 more fps is retarded as buying a mac. Anyway when tech progress enough to fuse cpu and gpu.. aka apu.. amds first apu is only early stages and it RIPS fuckin charts.
@tulp35000 I'd much rather spend $200 to play a game at 60 FPS than spend $100 and play it at 30 FPS. Luckily, I'm one of the few who prefers no foliage and few decals so I can get away with the $100 card and get 60 FPS in most games but my point still stands. You can buy a cheap card but your gaming experience will be worse unless you change the settings to work with your card.
NVIDIA and AMD are both rivals leap frogging each other in performance. Just buy whats good at the time.
Almost all Assets were technically and aesthetically designed to showcase physiX especially the enemy ruins that has Ink like bodies which it's sad that most mainstream reviewers reviewed the console version and never took this to account
@bunnyhallow you can't blame them, most people will play a console version of the game not the pc, you can't do every detail of the game on something that only powerful nvidia video cards can acomplish XD
@UshiromiyaReiji what you say is true but still the blame is on the developers, I'm not saying that using phisx is bad, on the contrary it's amazing, the problem is that you can't base vevery single animation, environment effec, etc... in the game on a system that only a few video cards can use, also the gamereviews that i've read critisi gameplay mechanics, boring platforming and that kind of stuff, they praised the graphics and made the cuote on the pc grpahics being better thnx to phisx
...But they certainly didn't base "every single animation, environmental effect, etc." on physX.
I don't get your point. Only the additional eyecandy (as huge of a difference as it makes) is done with physX, because if processed on the CPU, it would be extremely slow.
Besides, ATI refused to use physX themselves and haven't put out anything similar.
So I don't see why the developers are at fault for using the benefits of physX.
I can't believe in 2011 we need a PhysX-dedicated card to add some debrits effects... OK that's very nice but I think it needs to much ressources for this result. I'm sure Havok does it.
@Cpillin425 I recently upgraded from a crossfire 4870's to a single 6950, so I thought since I actually had another slot left, I may as well finally try the hacked PhysX drivers, and it's lovely, although it does lag sometimes because i'm using a 8800GTS (not very good for PhysX) maybe in the future I'll pay $30 for a better card to see the bonus eye candy (and that's all it is, a dying eye candy)
Alice2 runs great here @ 1920x1080 w/ PhysX on High / i7 920 @ 3.6ghz / EVGA GTX 480 / Win 7 64, I dont understand why the critic reviews are only average IMO this game is one of the best ive played in 2011.
I know what you mean. Though I built my rig for about $700 as a sort of budget build last year, things like this make me wish I had saved up the extra cash for a better computer.
Welp, looks like I'll finally attempt to install the hacked drivers and used my 8800GTS as a slave PhysX precessor since I recently upgraded to a HD6950. Gotta play the game in all it's PhysX glory!
the way its meant to be played, suck it amd fanboys physx in this game is amazing. its so dull and barren without it. hop on team green so you too can experience the awesomeness
@LOLMAN22 I am done with Nvidia trying to screw AMD customers with their stupid physX, good thing we have MLAA in The Witcher 2, and you can't run it. An eye for an eye, its only fair. I'm not buying into Nvidia just for the PhysX, now way dude, screw Nvidia.
@Cpillin425 hmm maybe ATI should stop sitting on their asses all day and release a competitor or a worthwhile emulator that can run the PhysX effects? Its been years and they have done nothing...I have been a loyal ATI customer since the days of 9800 Pro and I have owned at least 4 different ATI GPU's in the spawn of 10 years (9800 pro, X800 all in wonder, 4850, 5850...) the new 4xxxx and 5xxxx line suffered from poor driver support and overheating. I AM DONE!! BYE ATI
What a coincidence, I switched from Nvidia to AMD for the exact same reason you want to switch from AMD to Nvidia, poor Nvidia drivers, constant crashes, PhysX works, but it even crashes on their own cards (go figure). Like I said, want AMD MLAA? Buy an AMD card...its only fair. PhysX does nothing different and AMD Physics/Havok is better anyway.
@Cpillin425 MLAA only works in some PS3 games, best example of MLAA is God of War 3 which has the best IQ I have ever seen in a game...so far MLAA support has been worthless on the PC. I haven't used it for a single game...
@LOLMAN22 actually no, I can turn on MLAA in the Engine control Center for any game I want. The MLAA in GOW3 is not real MLAA, it's MLAA-style AA, not real MLAA. I wish you knew how good MLAA looks on an AMD GPU, but thats for me to enjoy and for you to go buy an AMD GPU and find out for yourself...it's only fair. You think physX looks good? you want me to go buy an Nvidia card? too bad cause im not doing that.
@Cpillin425 God of War 3 does use MLAA, google this article, "God of War AA coming to PC/360?"
Now I have 150 games on Steam and some more on D2D and EA Origin....including the newest titles like Witcher 2 and Crysis 2. Please enlighten me on which of these does MLAA look good on? So far from what I tried it looks WORSE in ALL games compared to (MSAA) not to mention it makes the HUD really blurry
@Cpillin425 I'm enjoying my new HD6950, but if you have an old nVidia 8000 series, or over, you can install some hacked PhysX drivers and still have your wonderful AMD GPU rendering the rest! You could probably buy a 8500GT for $50 now if you're interested in doing so.
@Floreum the bad thing about that is I have 2 AMD cards in crossfire, which is waaaayyyyyyyy better; but yeah I've heard that you can have an Nvidia card together with an AMD card...but I,m not doing that either, cause I am really enjoying this game anyway = )
Of course Nvidia pay developers to use it, and good on them. Everyone knows that 90% of dev's won't do anything PC specific without an incentive, especially in games like this.
Wow, besides Mafia 2, these are the best Physx enabled particle effects I've seen in a retail game! I love the music editing you did for this comparison video! Props to Zogrim! I might have to buy this on Steam after seeing these awesome effects. I really love platforming games, which I hear this is mostly a platforming game with heavy combat. If I do buy this, my Geforce GTX 470 better perform adequately with physx set at high. I had to delete several apex files just to get Mafia 2 running well
We need PhysX for games, no matter what others say. Otherwise games look just like the ones back in the '90s except maybe the graphics but that is not everything. If you want real games than do it with PhysX. Period
@airgilbert I love physx and some better texturing (as pretty much always nowadays) and less lock-on crap would make a pretty good pc version. Also having to go into a config file to make sure the game didn't lock fps at 30 is fucking ridiculous.
@Kronaras13 Correction games look empty without hardware accelerated physics, physx is outdated for a few reasons one OpenCL is more efficient than Cuda, and two both AMD and Nvidia cards support OpenCL. Havok uses OpenCL, and can be rendered on the GPU. I can assure you that over time OpenCL engines will take over. Why? Because no one really wants to code an engine for a game that will only work properly on half the computers out there.
Still this is an impressive display, and a great video.
This has been flagged as spam show
Name of intro song?
NikoBellicSerbia 1 week ago
Comment removed
NikoBellicSerbia 1 week ago
Does PS3 have high phsX?! Is there a setting?!
curiousepegasus 2 weeks ago
@curiousepegasus no, it's only for PC.
MadnessZ90 2 weeks ago
cool! the PS3 has LOW PhysX....:-( Oh well your vid is GREAT!! When she was stomping the chess board and smashing the Hobby Horse it was AWESOME!!!! :-D I wish the graphics WERE like that!
curiousepegasus 2 weeks ago
I have a ati card, and found this offensive.
TheHades14 2 weeks ago
Waiting for burnout with this.
goforit579 1 month ago
My game (alice madness returns) is REALLY laggy. A lot of people told me about the whole "lower your PhysX" or something.. Can anyone help me out on this?!
xLoveWithZombie 1 month ago
@xLoveWithZombie Just go on graphics settings and set PhysX on Low. If still laggy try to lower others things like antialiasing.
MadnessZ90 1 month ago
@xLoveWithZombie don't lower your physx just edit your AliceEngine.ini file
Hellraiserzzz 4 weeks ago
People always told Physx is gonna die if OpenGL comes, nothing happened do you know why?cuz PC developer are lazy as hell, they dont care if a new open standard comes out they wont use it. These physx effects are all made by nvidia, nvidia asks the developers to ad them into their games. Free work to make their games look better who would regret? So hate Nvidia and Physx so much you want but without them these games would be normal consoleports.
meProudToBeCaucasian 1 month ago
4:44 i feel really sorry for AMD users
club4ghz 2 months ago
it's sad only so few games support physx
yousini 2 months ago 3
Comment removed
tulp35000 2 months ago
NVIDIA и их видеокарты GeForce лучше всех!
igor091494 3 months ago
this game is pretty fun to play and the visuals are beautiful. some later stages are pretty sick though. also the story is a bit too dark for my taste.
yinhhusa 3 months ago
AliceSmashing the shit out of things with a maxed out Hobby Horse is more fun than I should admit to having...
thepocarisweat 4 months ago
when will ATI have an equivalent to PHYSX !?!?!?
Babelfish112 5 months ago
@Babelfish112 nver <-- See what i did there? But yeah why would Nvidia give something that they created just to force players into buying their graphics cards, brilliant really. And why not? Just buy an 580 and your'e all set for everything!
anagron63 4 months ago
I bought this solely for the xbox because the ps3 version was missing textures. I am super bummed that I didn't know about the physx before hand, it makes the game look so much better!
kmarois 5 months ago
The only thing nVidia holds over ATI.
I wish ATI could use Physx.
helium46 6 months ago
Comment removed
Ruflcopta 6 months ago
0:29 very big daddy =D
isorSOT 7 months ago
PC master race.
angrymarketing5 7 months ago 25
Look physics , look gfx, look gameplay. Look my controls DOESNT WORK !.
romanemul 7 months ago
If you have an AMD GPU, play through the game before you watch this. Trust me, it's heartbreaking.
ZiggyZoko 7 months ago 27
@ZiggyZoko That happend to me with Arkham Asylum. Needless to say I now have GTX 570's haha.
ResoImages 3 months ago
@ZiggyZoko I got a HD5970 is that a good card? Also, shall I have my physx on medium?
MindSeeR666 3 months ago
@MindSeeR666 ati cards just don't support the physx... it's your cpu that runs it.
MadnessZ90 3 months ago
@MadnessZ90 Eh,.. I got an i7 920 @ 4.2Ghz.. And I lag lol.. Everything on high even physx but my AA is off and I only lag in combat :s... Is my CPU not good enough?
MindSeeR666 3 months ago
@MindSeeR666 well a cpu is not good enough to run the physx. For me you should buy a dedicated physx card like a gt 440 (very cheap).
MadnessZ90 3 months ago
@MadnessZ90 I want a GTX 590. . -.- I want to sell my 5970.. It's an awful card
Go SLI with GTX 590s tehe. . Not like i'll be able to afford one.
But it's worth a shot next x mas. .
MindSeeR666 3 months ago
@MindSeeR666 if a gtx 590 is too expansive, i let you know that my gtx 560 ti, with lastest physx drivers, runs this game at 60 fps even in combat (only when i use too much the pepper grinder in the same place my fps drops to 30-40).
MadnessZ90 3 months ago
@MadnessZ90 Hmm, would a 580 be better? I want to go from AMD to nvidia. My 5770 is fine.. I won' be upgrading until next year or maybe the year after.. The drivers seem different and so does the ehh.. nvidias equivalent to CCC. . I may need some help in this. Tehe.
MindSeeR666 3 months ago
@MindSeeR666 i dont know how much you want to spend, but a gtx 560 Ti/570/580 are very nice cards.
MadnessZ90 3 months ago
@MadnessZ90 I won't be upgrade til next x mas really.. I've got an Asus P6T deluxe V2 I want to do SLI with maybe the GTX 580s. .
MindSeeR666 3 months ago
@ZiggyZoko Hmm, i have 6950 and it's more than enough to run any game max at 1080p... some needs to disbe aa but only beast games like metro 2033... i could get a 285 gt as a secondary and use cracked drivers for physx to work on primary amd gpu, for what? More dust and debris? No thx. I also do not want extra noise and power consumption. The thing is, you play for physx way overpriced, there arent that many games to begin with.. so just get 6990 beast and cheap nvidia for secondary physx card.
tulp35000 2 months ago
@ZiggyZoko And buying nvidia isn't worth it, their cards are priced higher, low quality components and the only unique thing is physx. Don't troll me bitches.
tulp35000 2 months ago
@tulp35000 typical ati fan boy... i had an 8800 gts, gtx 260 and now i have a gtx 560 ti, i never had a problem with them and i played the games with max settings. I don't want say that ATI is bad (i had a 5830 too) but we are talking about physx, so if you want play these games with a nice realistic get an Nvdia card or like you said a dedicated physx card.
MadnessZ90 2 months ago
@MadnessZ90 My first nvidia card fried in a week under no load at all... As i said, it's all marketing crap.
tulp35000 2 months ago
@tulp35000 My first ATI card fried fast too. Since then I've never purchased one again, but that is simply because I liked my experience with NVIDIA cards, and their Control Panel/Website/Drivers better than ATI. You need to stop whining about a faulty card every brand has them, you should have returned it.
Ruflcopta 2 months ago
@Ruflcopta Likewise, Ati ftw. Just because you like to pay almost double price for 10-30 more fps is retarded as buying a mac. Anyway when tech progress enough to fuse cpu and gpu.. aka apu.. amds first apu is only early stages and it RIPS fuckin charts.
tulp35000 2 months ago
@tulp35000 I'd much rather spend $200 to play a game at 60 FPS than spend $100 and play it at 30 FPS. Luckily, I'm one of the few who prefers no foliage and few decals so I can get away with the $100 card and get 60 FPS in most games but my point still stands. You can buy a cheap card but your gaming experience will be worse unless you change the settings to work with your card.
NVIDIA and AMD are both rivals leap frogging each other in performance. Just buy whats good at the time.
Ruflcopta 2 months ago
@ZiggyZoko Use old and or modded physx drivers, use an 8800 or other cheap nvidia card in one of your spare pcie slots. Bam Physx with ATI/AMD.
Mike9042 2 days ago
Almost all Assets were technically and aesthetically designed to showcase physiX especially the enemy ruins that has Ink like bodies which it's sad that most mainstream reviewers reviewed the console version and never took this to account
bunnyhallow 7 months ago
@bunnyhallow you can't blame them, most people will play a console version of the game not the pc, you can't do every detail of the game on something that only powerful nvidia video cards can acomplish XD
darkjaden2 7 months ago
@darkjaden2
Yes, you can.
They reviewed the PC version without including the PC-only benefits, i.e. PhysX, and PhysX makes a chasm of difference in this game.
UshiromiyaReiji 7 months ago
@UshiromiyaReiji what you say is true but still the blame is on the developers, I'm not saying that using phisx is bad, on the contrary it's amazing, the problem is that you can't base vevery single animation, environment effec, etc... in the game on a system that only a few video cards can use, also the gamereviews that i've read critisi gameplay mechanics, boring platforming and that kind of stuff, they praised the graphics and made the cuote on the pc grpahics being better thnx to phisx
darkjaden2 7 months ago
@darkjaden2
...But they certainly didn't base "every single animation, environmental effect, etc." on physX.
I don't get your point. Only the additional eyecandy (as huge of a difference as it makes) is done with physX, because if processed on the CPU, it would be extremely slow.
Besides, ATI refused to use physX themselves and haven't put out anything similar.
So I don't see why the developers are at fault for using the benefits of physX.
UshiromiyaReiji 7 months ago
By far the best showcase of physX yet.
Finally, a game other than Mirror's Edge that shows how much of a difference the technology can make.
I had been using strictly ATi cards for, what, maybe seven years, but I suspect that physX will become a necessity to enjoy titles in some time.
Recently bought a GTX 560 Ti Sonic and I'm loving the incredible performance in Alice and any physX-enabled title.
UshiromiyaReiji 7 months ago 4
I got gtx260 and I get at least 25 frames on high so... im good I guess, the game seems sorta like a tech demo since its gameplay is meh
leonkennedy4011 7 months ago
460gtx i have 15fps on medium quality in boss battle, nvidia is sucks.
frkmybrain 8 months ago
@frkmybrain What processor do you have and how much memory
bornwisedistruction 8 months ago
my HD 5770 is a shit, amd shit, Nvidia Rulez
gameswindows 8 months ago
in 2 years playing witfh Physx will be necessity
WTFgamingpl 8 months ago
physx low looked like its played on ps3
LOTDCrew 8 months ago
I think "Medium" is the best for my PC.
bakacdaz 8 months ago
I can't believe in 2011 we need a PhysX-dedicated card to add some debrits effects... OK that's very nice but I think it needs to much ressources for this result. I'm sure Havok does it.
Gamebinger 8 months ago
so ,not only console gamers have stupid ps3/xbox 360 war, but pc gamers have stupid nvidia/ati war...humans are just nasty.
alef321 8 months ago 4
I play it on medium PhysX settings, and I have nvidia GTX 460 SE
Is there huge difference between high and medium ?
maroom1 8 months ago
@maroom1 I'd say big enough.
JohnyK89 8 months ago
First game that opens my mouth with Physx!
Well done!
Btw, I own an ATI video card
fcu423 8 months ago
I like how alot of the comments are made with nVidia fanboys
slapsus 8 months ago
@Cpillin425 I recently upgraded from a crossfire 4870's to a single 6950, so I thought since I actually had another slot left, I may as well finally try the hacked PhysX drivers, and it's lovely, although it does lag sometimes because i'm using a 8800GTS (not very good for PhysX) maybe in the future I'll pay $30 for a better card to see the bonus eye candy (and that's all it is, a dying eye candy)
Floreum 8 months ago
Alice2 runs great here @ 1920x1080 w/ PhysX on High / i7 920 @ 3.6ghz / EVGA GTX 480 / Win 7 64, I dont understand why the critic reviews are only average IMO this game is one of the best ive played in 2011.
73mathesar 8 months ago
As an ATI owner, this makes me sad :(
an1m4l 8 months ago
@an1m4l CRY SOME MORE!!!
10samm10 8 months ago
@an1m4l You can run a dedicated PhysX card with an ATI card. Something like a 9800gtx would work great for that.
Droogie128 8 months ago
I got a AMD XFX HD 6950 xxx Edition with 2gb of ram and in fighting scenes with a big amount of Physx shit on Phsyx=High it does HORRIBLE lag...
I barely notice a difference between my old graphics card= nVidia GeForce gtx260
xs0ulLess 8 months ago
damn, nVidia was always hot, ordered a new EVGA geforce 580 GTX DS Superclocked :)
cant wait for it
EnixDark88 8 months ago
mfw I have an ATI gpu, feels badman. :(
shilipsy 8 months ago
@shilipsy
I know what you mean. Though I built my rig for about $700 as a sort of budget build last year, things like this make me wish I had saved up the extra cash for a better computer.
edik23 8 months ago
PhysX high kills even GTX 560+ gpus on certain scenes. Wow. Better get a dedicated physx card sometime soon.
dingumfCallofDuty 8 months ago
@dingumfCallofDuty really? i've got a gtx 480 and the lowest frame rate that i've gotten is like 30-40 fps
Ball50f5teal 8 months ago
@Ball50f5teal 30 fps is pretty low. You can actually notice the lag. Did you even visit the website the video description?
dingumfCallofDuty 8 months ago
@dingumfCallofDuty 30 fps is the MINIMUM i get and it only lasts for like a couple of seconds, otherwise its constantly at 60fps
Ball50f5teal 8 months ago
Welp, looks like I'll finally attempt to install the hacked drivers and used my 8800GTS as a slave PhysX precessor since I recently upgraded to a HD6950. Gotta play the game in all it's PhysX glory!
Floreum 8 months ago
My GTX460 plays on high fine and it's fully playable. PhysX is much better on, 1920x1080, maxed out, 8x CSAA, VSync on.
GIMPMan1972 8 months ago
poor consoles, don't worry you'll get there soon
Ball50f5teal 8 months ago 5
PhysX is great but it needs a monsterous video card... Alice is extremelly slowing down on my GTX 275 when I turn on PhysX :(
zompi2 8 months ago
the way its meant to be played, suck it amd fanboys physx in this game is amazing. its so dull and barren without it. hop on team green so you too can experience the awesomeness
dontforkwitme 8 months ago
I knew it I should of gotten this game for PC instead
Jerry4050 8 months ago
No matter what physix settings are chosen, graphics looks ugly and ridiculously outdated.
GTI8855 8 months ago
I'm pretty sure low Physx is off, in the ini files low sets physx to 0.
okami485 8 months ago
MLAA is only needed for GTAIV, most other games have either ingame AA, or it can be forced on in the drivers.
MLAA is nothing more than a blurry post processing effect that was meant for consoles anyway.
Redemption80 8 months ago
Comment removed
LyonFCSH 8 months ago
can a GTX 580 run this at 1080p at 60 FPS with phyx on high? I am done with ATI and their overheating cards
LOLMAN22 8 months ago
@LOLMAN22 I am done with Nvidia trying to screw AMD customers with their stupid physX, good thing we have MLAA in The Witcher 2, and you can't run it. An eye for an eye, its only fair. I'm not buying into Nvidia just for the PhysX, now way dude, screw Nvidia.
Cpillin425 8 months ago
@Cpillin425 hmm maybe ATI should stop sitting on their asses all day and release a competitor or a worthwhile emulator that can run the PhysX effects? Its been years and they have done nothing...I have been a loyal ATI customer since the days of 9800 Pro and I have owned at least 4 different ATI GPU's in the spawn of 10 years (9800 pro, X800 all in wonder, 4850, 5850...) the new 4xxxx and 5xxxx line suffered from poor driver support and overheating. I AM DONE!! BYE ATI
LOLMAN22 8 months ago
What a coincidence, I switched from Nvidia to AMD for the exact same reason you want to switch from AMD to Nvidia, poor Nvidia drivers, constant crashes, PhysX works, but it even crashes on their own cards (go figure). Like I said, want AMD MLAA? Buy an AMD card...its only fair. PhysX does nothing different and AMD Physics/Havok is better anyway.
Cpillin425 8 months ago
@Cpillin425 MLAA only works in some PS3 games, best example of MLAA is God of War 3 which has the best IQ I have ever seen in a game...so far MLAA support has been worthless on the PC. I haven't used it for a single game...
LOLMAN22 8 months ago
@LOLMAN22 actually no, I can turn on MLAA in the Engine control Center for any game I want. The MLAA in GOW3 is not real MLAA, it's MLAA-style AA, not real MLAA. I wish you knew how good MLAA looks on an AMD GPU, but thats for me to enjoy and for you to go buy an AMD GPU and find out for yourself...it's only fair. You think physX looks good? you want me to go buy an Nvidia card? too bad cause im not doing that.
Cpillin425 8 months ago
@Cpillin425 God of War 3 does use MLAA, google this article, "God of War AA coming to PC/360?"
Now I have 150 games on Steam and some more on D2D and EA Origin....including the newest titles like Witcher 2 and Crysis 2. Please enlighten me on which of these does MLAA look good on? So far from what I tried it looks WORSE in ALL games compared to (MSAA) not to mention it makes the HUD really blurry
LOLMAN22 8 months ago
150 games lol tell me how many of those are from 2011 that you've actually tried MLAA on?
Cpillin425 8 months ago
@Cpillin425 I'm enjoying my new HD6950, but if you have an old nVidia 8000 series, or over, you can install some hacked PhysX drivers and still have your wonderful AMD GPU rendering the rest! You could probably buy a 8500GT for $50 now if you're interested in doing so.
Floreum 8 months ago
@Floreum the bad thing about that is I have 2 AMD cards in crossfire, which is waaaayyyyyyyy better; but yeah I've heard that you can have an Nvidia card together with an AMD card...but I,m not doing that either, cause I am really enjoying this game anyway = )
Cpillin425 8 months ago
@Cpillin425
Wrong, I have nvidia card and I can run MLAA in witcher 2
THe MLAA used in witcher 2 is different than MLAA used by ATI. It works in all video cards
maroom1 8 months ago
Of course Nvidia pay developers to use it, and good on them. Everyone knows that 90% of dev's won't do anything PC specific without an incentive, especially in games like this.
Redemption80 8 months ago
Nothing impressive to be honest. It's still looking far worse than physx demos from AGEIA made ages ago.
werez11 8 months ago
Wow, besides Mafia 2, these are the best Physx enabled particle effects I've seen in a retail game! I love the music editing you did for this comparison video! Props to Zogrim! I might have to buy this on Steam after seeing these awesome effects. I really love platforming games, which I hear this is mostly a platforming game with heavy combat. If I do buy this, my Geforce GTX 470 better perform adequately with physx set at high. I had to delete several apex files just to get Mafia 2 running well
PimblyCharles 8 months ago
We need PhysX for games, no matter what others say. Otherwise games look just like the ones back in the '90s except maybe the graphics but that is not everything. If you want real games than do it with PhysX. Period
Skateout88 8 months ago
Low may as well be "off."
half of this could easily be handled on either ATI or the CPU, just a gimmick for Nvidia to sell cards and pay developers to make it in their games.
gyloir 8 months ago
I do not have apex destruction... :( What should I do? I have a GTX480. My Physx settings are high.
slayer1944 8 months ago
Crappy console port.
airgilbert 8 months ago
@airgilbert I love physx and some better texturing (as pretty much always nowadays) and less lock-on crap would make a pretty good pc version. Also having to go into a config file to make sure the game didn't lock fps at 30 is fucking ridiculous.
JayJapanB 8 months ago
the physics with the liquid of the blood looks really great
C0Opd0g 8 months ago
Greater perfomance is marketing too. So?
If nVidia have technology, they can proud.
IVI00101 8 months ago 2
Way to play dirty, Nvidia.
xymox007 8 months ago
класс
hazard0vich 8 months ago 3
Awesome dude, great video as ever.. :)
othman626 8 months ago
Apex destruction has got to be the greatest thing since sliced bread.
DeadPixel00 8 months ago
Games look so empty without physx...
Kronaras13 8 months ago 59
@Kronaras13 It's all a marketing scheme
TheCompyshop 8 months ago
@Kronaras13 because they remove all the stuff from normal mode
13AnGeL666 8 months ago
@Kronaras13 Correction games look empty without hardware accelerated physics, physx is outdated for a few reasons one OpenCL is more efficient than Cuda, and two both AMD and Nvidia cards support OpenCL. Havok uses OpenCL, and can be rendered on the GPU. I can assure you that over time OpenCL engines will take over. Why? Because no one really wants to code an engine for a game that will only work properly on half the computers out there.
Still this is an impressive display, and a great video.
Mike9042 8 months ago
wow, great vid first off :) do you know what the name of the song is?
acenumbah1 8 months ago
Physx low looked more like Physx off.
emons9 8 months ago 53
Thanks for the demonstration!
Very nice
ecidemon1 8 months ago