Ive emailed WWE about Wargames several times. I think it would be great, but in reality WWE is probably moving further away from that possibility. Heres why I think so. Wargames was at the annual ppv Wrestlewar which was renamed Fall Brawl. WWE had Survivor Series around Thanksgiving in the fall. WWE has recently phased out the Survivor Series concept. Wargames was basically a Survivor Series type of match, in an enclosed cage. Adding the Wargames match to Survivor Series seemed logical.
The double ring is a much better idea than the triple cage. The triple cage was a cluster fuck in WCW and it would be in WWE too. You have to remember the triple cage was a product of vince russo and there's a reason it, and WCW don't exist anymore
besides from the previous attempt of a staple of the sons of legends such as legacy for this theres got to be more angles to create more stables this way it can be a war
problem with war games, is that there arent really any real stables anymore, youve got tag teams, and all that, but since evolution if im not mistaken there havent been any stables (outside of legacy)
I think it would be pretty sweet to see War Games in WWE, I'm not sure if Vince would srew it up but he can get the Royal Rumble right, so he probably won't screw it up
wwe in having hell in a cell ppv also this year every match in hell in a cell it was meant to be a special match but will get downgraded they should have come up with some new structure and have that as a ppv but its obvious they are copying lockdown.
i would like to see more new matches/ events in wwe hell in a cell, cage, and elimination chamber are over used now and cage match has been downgraded to barely a nothing match now always on raw and smackdown never on ppv. i would love to see triple cage etc and any new match that was in wcw and ecwm also some new creations which we havent had one since punjabi prison.
please this is absolutely stupid and would end up a huge mistake. look at how bad wwe screwed up the great american bash. anything wwe tries to do that nwa/wcw has already done ends up being total shit. just like their wrestling today is equal to crap.
I rather have WWE release a Best of Wargames DVD if they ever do and see where it goes from there. I never seen Wargames before so having a DVD would boost sales. Wargames is WCW's version of the royal rumble and shouldn't be brought into WWE. WWE has Elimination Chamber which is kinda like Wargames or the successor to it. WWE could have a storyline where you have Raw vs Smackdown vs ECW in a storyline or even Shane vs Stephanie for power of WWE.
They don't need to be bringing back old gimmicks. Personally, I hate matches like War Games or TNA's Lockdown because I hate watching matches through a fucking fence. One steel cage match once in a while is fine, but to have most of the attention focused in a cage doesn't do much for me.
I don't know i though about that for awhile but Vince's doesn't come up with these kinda's of matchs, in WCW they had a bunch of crazy structure cage matchs, like 3 triple cage match, the wierd electracution match that was in a huge fucked up cage, Tower of doom match i think its called... so it sounded alot like WCW idea a huge elimanition cage match i can see vince adding more simplicity to the possible original idea Eric might of had but still think its his idea
Well some people probably thought The Elimination Chamber wasn't necessary with Hell in a Cell matches being so good, but it worked anyway. I'm sure if WWE gave Wargames a chance it would be a huge success, maybe making it a one-brand exclusive or something. But I'll probably see Tupac walking down the street before that ever happens.
A good idea, love the war games match and would love to see it brought back as a pay per view. Imagine we could have one match from Raw and one from Smackdown.
RAW wargames main event could be The Legacy vs Batista, Mysterio, CM Punk and Kofi Kingston.
Smackdown war games main event: Edge, Christian, Chavo and The Big Show vs HHH, The Hardyz and The Undertaker.
If the two ring thing is a problem for Vince, I would argue that it doesn't absolutely have to be two cages. Like its been said, TNA does Lethal Lockdown every year with 8-10 guys with one ring which is smaller than the standard WWE ring. During the Weekly PPV Era, TNA also put on that "Wednesday Bloody Wednesday" War Games match but with one ring, and it turned out fine.
I think the taking up seats excuse is a bad one. A rectangular dual ring set-up has a larger perimeter and thus more front row seats, and second row seats behind that, third row seats and so on. You lose by having less seats the furthest back from the ring on the floors. You have more high price front row tickets to make up for less low price back floor tickets. If you charge right (well not right, but effectively) you can stand to make more.
How about wargames with just 1 ring and the new HIAC structure? I mean, the new cell is fucking huge, and the last time we had a multi-man HIAC type thing (I do NOT count DX vs Big Show/Vince/Shane a HIAC match at all) was that awesome 6 man, and I still know people marking out to this day over that match
WWE should promoted a dvd on the Best Of Wargames . And then they should elimiated the Elimination Chamber and put the Wargames at Survivor Series as a annual event .
Another thing the WWE has going against it is that they have spent so much time down playing anything with a team aspect to it (Tag Division, Survivor Series) that it would be hard for them to sell a PPV with a Team Battle Main Event, even if it is something as cool as War Games.
how about this idea: message some wrestlers that have a myspace (Matt Hardy, Gregory Helms, etc.) and tell them we want to see Wargames. if alot of people tell wrestlers that we want to see them, one of them is bound to go to Vince or somebody and bring it up. just a thought. would probably work better than a petition.
I believe it was a few years ago he tried to get it done with Evolution vs somebody. and I am not shocked he wants to do it he is a flair and horsemen mark
Because if were the one to book it Ill defiantly do it this way. Since Vince has been taken out of the picture. Raw once again solely lies in Stephanies hands, but once Shane returns to take the place of his incapacitated father.
he'll start a feud with Stephanie; by telling her that the only reason she got the Raw job was because she was incumbent; and that their father was afraid of backing down from his throne because he knows Shane will erase him from history by making the WWE better then he can ever make it. This will eventually lead Shane to say that He doesnt have to anymore because hes starting his own 'raslin' business.
Shane would then attempt to split the company in two by taking all taking the superstars that he deems worthy, which would be superstars that are either 2, 3, 4 generation wrestlers; that feel they shouldnt be taking a backseat to no-name wrestlers and that they should be the main event because their fathers built this business. This would then lead to Stephenie feeling that she would have to keep the company intact declaring that Shane be strip of his power before he kills the WWE
This in turn backfires on her because she and Shane are equivalent to one another and that if he gives up his power she must do the same.Feeling that there is no other alternatives left from stopping Shane from succeeding,Stephanie declares a Civil War within the WWE. Stating that:A civil war will destroy us but a civil war is the only thing that can save us.With a civil war being declared a War Games match would defiantly be possible.
Especially if all the superstars on Raw that hold the titles are faces.
Examples: Cena, Punk,...Maybe Cryme Tyme (Since these guys already have problems or past fueds with Orton and Legacy.)
So the war games match would be
Team Raw (CTC and Punk) vs Legacy (Orton, Rhodes, Dibiase, Maybe Harry Smith.)
But the odds this happening is pretty off Especially if Vince has to use two rings, but heres a thought! Why don't they just use to cages instead.(See: Al Snow vs Bossman, Kanel From Hell)
There are 2 more ways i thought of, WWE could make a more similar to war games match, they could use the chamber, 3 teams in it, 6 chambers, 3 wrestlers start, every minute a wrestler is released from his chamber. It would be a cool match. But if people really wanna see wargames they should make a really big noise that can shake the ground from under vince, e.g. lots and lots of views for war game's matches on youtube/dailymotion/etc, maybe buy the wcw ppv's involving wargames.
Then why would Vince bring back The Great American Bash if that was a WCW thing too. I believe Vince does not want to use The Wargames match because he is not willing to give up seats and money from ticket sales for one match.
I personally feel that WWE missed an opportunity to do War Games several years ago when Evolution was the top stable in the WWE. Many people on the board I post on feel that if they had done War Games back then in the WWE it would have been a good match.
If Lockdown did really well in sales (PPV Buyrates, Attendance, DVDs) it could be credited to the concept of an all cage PPV in general, and not necessarily out of a desire to see War Games brought.
The TNA suggestion is redundant. WWE does not give a shit about what TNA does.
WWE doesn't even have any real stables in their company to do a War Games match.
Also, that comment about only seeing the PPV to see the Joe match is pretty funny since the Joe match wasn't even on the PPV.
The Triple H comment to also contradicts what everyone thinks in that Triple H has unlimited backstage power. If he had enough and cared for War Games enough, we would have seen it already then.
They could use all 3 brands in the match like a Raw vs Smackdown! vs ECW. I just think, Vince is just keeping the fans in suspense he probably wants it to happen but in like 10 years, just to make it big surprise, if not then when he dies, whoever is incharge could finally book it.
Another agrument AGAINST war games that you didn't mention: The time necessary to set up the cage. There just is no time during a live PPV to set up a cage. I guess they could hang it from the ceiling like HIAC, but there's another expense.
Meh, WWE would likely butcher Wargames. The NWA, although at a much, much smaller scale, it does still have Wargames matches. I wouldn't mind seeing ROH give a swing at it, though.
with all due respect, do you really think that tna is even on vince's radar? i mean even if lockdown gets a really good buy rate, i don't think vince would even bat an eye...its not like tna is in close competition with wwe
agreed. the wwe has all sorts of promo and mechandise, and better showings. video games( tna has one game that i heard sucked), wwe shop, promos for upcoming ppv on popular networks, advertising on internet websites, and they have over 14000 people at live events( none ppv) TNA will never be close to the wwe or will never be on vince's radar
Yeah, and WWE was supposed to win the Monday NIght Wars. WCW didn't even beat WWE in some attendance records and buyrates but still won in ratings and were considered the bigger company. It matters what the company can do. You are talking about TNA which in turn is promoting them. No matter how big a company is, they always watch other companies around them. WCW and WWE did it with ECW, I'm sure WWE does it with TNA today.
Much less ROH's buyrates Astone...Vince might glance at the numbers if they were astronomical in comparison to their normal buy rates, but I seriously doubt it would pop the idea of bringing wargames back into his head.
mysterio, I agree with you. The only problem is, is the number of wrestlers in the match. I dont think you can have like 8 guys crowded in one cage though.
The idea solution would be make Wargames a Hell in a Cell variant. This would not only give it the WWE stamp, but would solve the problem of one ring not having enough space to work in. The best ppv to do it on would surely be Survivor Series.
I hate the Lockdown concept because to me it asks way too much of the wrestlers to go out there and have 8 cage matches. I remember when they announced the first one in 2005 and thought "What the fuck?!?!" Ive enjoyed every Lockdown to some degree & I love having Lethal Lockdown, but I still think 8 cage matches in one show is way too much.
IMO, you will get War Games once Vince steps aside & Steph takes over because HHH wants to do it.
Lockdown is something new. It is a new concept. TNA is smart to make a PPV dedicated to something.WWE had survivor Series being just elimination matches, but have left that tradition over the years that it isn't about Surviving anymore. Be glad TNA is keeping a tradition alive. If they just build feuds to end at Lockdown it will mean more and make more sense.
I understand that & for the most part Lockdown has delivered some really good stuff but I remember when they first announced the concept & hearing interviews with AJ where he said he didnt like it.
Having 8 cages is essentially having 8 main events & that is very hard to pull off & it results in various stinkers to try & make each match different (every LD to date has had at either one over gimmicked match, one stinker, or both)
Though AJ today and after Lockdown enjoyed it. As for most people involved in it. TNA just needs to not place fillers at the event and it will be better. Have 7 matches total. Lethal Lockdown, Xscape match, and the rest being simple cage matches. All the matches have meaning and there will be no problem. All the belts on the line at the event and ending of major feuds there.
Nice vid. Not much more for me to say on this. I'm hopinh Lockdown is actually a show worth buying though. I get it for free as it is, but still. TNA has to put work in to be able to actually expand among fans.
WWE could give it a test run by integrating 1 tribranded WarGames match into Survivor Series. Have your top rivalries play out in this match. This should keep the live crowd into it.
Off the topic:
How about bringing the match of Survivors back to the Survivor Series?
I've always been a fan of rare gimmick matches. World War 3 is something that I would like to see again, but if I looked at it objectively it would be a huge clusterf*ck. If McMahon hates two rings, he'd hate three.
I don't see them bringing the Survivor's match. I don't understand why they did'nt continue it after 1990. Must've been a time thing. After that Survivor Series they started to add singles matches (and other non traditional SS team elimination matches) to the Survivor Series cards.
a SURVIVOR SERES type match with twin ring with a cage that goes around it kind of cool but the cage was small one guy tryed to power bomb a another guy and he hit the guys head on the top of the cage
Sid Vicious powerbomb Brian Pillman into the top of the cage headfirst, then dropping him right on his neck. In 1991.
Whoever thought that was the best way to end that match was silly, especially when Sid's HAIR was touching the roof of the damn cage. Shows you how low that cage really is.
Simple solution for me, although it's not quite wargames. You book an eight man Hell in a Cell, with guys entering every five minutes. Match has to go at least a half hour, but it solves a lot of the problems with war games in WWE.
ROH has announced concerning te Steel Cage match at the end of the month will be, 5 on 5 Elimination Syle Cage Match. So It's pretty much as Wa Games-Esque as you can get w/o calling it wargames
i used to love war games, especially with the nwo. as far as tna getting 100,000 ppv buys, i highly doubt it especially with a lot of the poor acting last year(booker t turning heel LOL).
Survivor Series would be a great PPV to have a War Games. Only problem is there prolly won't be any Survivor Series matches.
T Slay if you're a fan of War Games IWA Mid South had one in 2005. Also, I am not too sure if you're into Death Matches but at this years King of the Death Matches Ian announced there will be two rings. Maybe a War Games final.
But anyway good video and I would definitely buy a Best of War Games DVD.
I agree,I remmber the funks vs. the Rhodes,I think with TNA's ppv in Philly I think they will have a very good attendance numbers and with every thing so close up their its possible that they could have a lot people who just appreciate awesome wrestling in general
Team Orton vs. Team Samoa (Manu, Sim, and Umaga) vs. Team Edge (Edge, Big Show, Chavo) vs. Team Hardy (Matt, Jeff, and Helms). That would be an awesome wargame. Have 1 on 1, or Tag team matches each week, and have a scoreboard, and the last two teams left can settle it in a 3 on 3 Elimination Cage/HiaC match. PCW did something like that. They called it "Fight Win Survive". I was...pretty awesome.
Yes
winfir0 3 months ago
Ive emailed WWE about Wargames several times. I think it would be great, but in reality WWE is probably moving further away from that possibility. Heres why I think so. Wargames was at the annual ppv Wrestlewar which was renamed Fall Brawl. WWE had Survivor Series around Thanksgiving in the fall. WWE has recently phased out the Survivor Series concept. Wargames was basically a Survivor Series type of match, in an enclosed cage. Adding the Wargames match to Survivor Series seemed logical.
rojoshow13 8 months ago
I'd like to see a WarGames in WWE
GurahkXWeavile 1 year ago
What the heck! All this talent in your head and your not working for a promotion?
jm0226 1 year ago
The double ring is a much better idea than the triple cage. The triple cage was a cluster fuck in WCW and it would be in WWE too. You have to remember the triple cage was a product of vince russo and there's a reason it, and WCW don't exist anymore
bman32x 1 year ago
the triple cage would be a good idea 4 the wwe it would be stupid 4 them 2 have the 2 ring wargames
cenax3 2 years ago
I would rather hve the triple cage match, that shit was epic
bouncieboy1027 2 years ago
Do we really want a bloodless War Games? with the PG rating Vince will not want something like that right now.
branmakmorn 2 years ago
hey i just read that vince is looking to change judgment day to war games.
Jmanofsteel2 2 years ago
I read that too..how can ya have a war games if it's rated PG?
mooky9669 2 years ago
in ppvs they drop the pg when they want look at extreme rules
craignuste 2 years ago
besides from the previous attempt of a staple of the sons of legends such as legacy for this theres got to be more angles to create more stables this way it can be a war
Bigstarrocker9 2 years ago
problem with war games, is that there arent really any real stables anymore, youve got tag teams, and all that, but since evolution if im not mistaken there havent been any stables (outside of legacy)
idaman12345 2 years ago
yeah thats what I would say, man I wish there was more stables in WWE now, theres are a few tag teams i like in WWE now
m0tl3ysl4y3r 2 years ago
I think it would be pretty sweet to see War Games in WWE, I'm not sure if Vince would srew it up but he can get the Royal Rumble right, so he probably won't screw it up
m0tl3ysl4y3r 2 years ago
I personally think the Arn Anderson injury really hurt war games.
Arn Anderson was brilliant in all of them and once he stopped wrestling in them they lost steam.
Pre 1996 they were all awesome (Yes I liked it in 1995)
1996 it was more about pushing the story but it was alright. Great crowd and Luger was excellent.
1997- Not too huge on this one (Like I said No Arn Anderson)
1998- Hated it.
After....Sucked ass.
shuxion 2 years ago
I would love to see War Games return!
The Elimination Chamber is pretty much the War Games match for individual/singles, instead of two stables/teams.
xobrentox 2 years ago 2
Thats the other form of war games
SvRvstTNA 2 years ago
I don't want a Wargames in wwe. They would just fuck it up anyway. Vince always fuck up what he didn't create.
lordblack28 2 years ago 2
there should be a tlc cage match were its similer to ultimet x where you must climb and cage on the inside and get the title on a very high cage
roschow 2 years ago
wwe in having hell in a cell ppv also this year every match in hell in a cell it was meant to be a special match but will get downgraded they should have come up with some new structure and have that as a ppv but its obvious they are copying lockdown.
NuFcPRO 2 years ago
i would like to see more new matches/ events in wwe hell in a cell, cage, and elimination chamber are over used now and cage match has been downgraded to barely a nothing match now always on raw and smackdown never on ppv. i would love to see triple cage etc and any new match that was in wcw and ecwm also some new creations which we havent had one since punjabi prison.
NuFcPRO 2 years ago
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
stintonrip1 2 years ago
Hell in a cell is the best
stintonrip1 2 years ago
Orton,DiBiase,Rhodes,and a new member to legacy
vs.
HHH,Batista,Flair,???
i dnt want to see flair back but in a wargames, i wouldnt have that much of a problem with it
shrexy 2 years ago
please this is absolutely stupid and would end up a huge mistake. look at how bad wwe screwed up the great american bash. anything wwe tries to do that nwa/wcw has already done ends up being total shit. just like their wrestling today is equal to crap.
seoulsoju 2 years ago 2
I rather have WWE release a Best of Wargames DVD if they ever do and see where it goes from there. I never seen Wargames before so having a DVD would boost sales. Wargames is WCW's version of the royal rumble and shouldn't be brought into WWE. WWE has Elimination Chamber which is kinda like Wargames or the successor to it. WWE could have a storyline where you have Raw vs Smackdown vs ECW in a storyline or even Shane vs Stephanie for power of WWE.
psmgamer 2 years ago
vince is jealous
y2jbrock 2 years ago
I would like to see Wargames in the WWE but Vince won't let that happen.
TG5455 2 years ago
they have overdone the chamber already
y2jbrock 2 years ago
I doubt WWE will ever do war games
ststriker 3 years ago
I'd do a Raw Vs Smackdown War Games:
Team Raw: John Cena, Randy Orton, Chris Jericho, Shawn Michaels & JBL
Team Smackdown: Edge, HHH, Jeff Hardy, Undertaker & Big Show
Londrick 3 years ago
get rid of elimination chamber
bring in wargames
Obezeballz469 3 years ago
There wasn't a bad War Games until 98, which as you stated was the third one involving the nWo.
SquallsBladeV2 3 years ago
nice vid
brandonbk12 3 years ago
They don't need to be bringing back old gimmicks. Personally, I hate matches like War Games or TNA's Lockdown because I hate watching matches through a fucking fence. One steel cage match once in a while is fine, but to have most of the attention focused in a cage doesn't do much for me.
victimsofthefuture 3 years ago
Didn't Eric Bishoff came up with Elimination Chamber?
saynotodrug999 3 years ago 3
kayfab or is it keyfab? he did
Cmpunkmark101 3 years ago
Kayfabe
RicFlairFuckingRules 3 years ago
according to story line yes..... in reality i don't think so.
yourmaster789 3 years ago
I don't know i though about that for awhile but Vince's doesn't come up with these kinda's of matchs, in WCW they had a bunch of crazy structure cage matchs, like 3 triple cage match, the wierd electracution match that was in a huge fucked up cage, Tower of doom match i think its called... so it sounded alot like WCW idea a huge elimanition cage match i can see vince adding more simplicity to the possible original idea Eric might of had but still think its his idea
saynotodrug999 3 years ago 2
Wargames was not Eric's idea, it was CROCKETT'S idea. Wargames was around long before WCW broke away from the NWA
RoderickStrong 2 years ago
Actually, I looked it up: Wargames was actually created by Dusty Rhodes
RoderickStrong 2 years ago 2
ya but i didn't say Eric I said WCW, and i didn't named the Wargames, just other kinda of huge cage matchs in WCW
saynotodrug999 2 years ago
Well some people probably thought The Elimination Chamber wasn't necessary with Hell in a Cell matches being so good, but it worked anyway. I'm sure if WWE gave Wargames a chance it would be a huge success, maybe making it a one-brand exclusive or something. But I'll probably see Tupac walking down the street before that ever happens.
Deeznutz5150 3 years ago 6
Lol.Oh and they should of use Wargames during the InVasion storyline.
KhooksWrestlefan0315 3 years ago
whats wargames?
cricketsam64 3 years ago
Ever tried searching on YouTube?
Deeznutz5150 3 years ago
A good idea, love the war games match and would love to see it brought back as a pay per view. Imagine we could have one match from Raw and one from Smackdown.
RAW wargames main event could be The Legacy vs Batista, Mysterio, CM Punk and Kofi Kingston.
Smackdown war games main event: Edge, Christian, Chavo and The Big Show vs HHH, The Hardyz and The Undertaker.
popofbling 3 years ago
wats wargames
highdef1son 3 years ago
The closest I could see WWE doing is using the Elimination Chamber cage to do a 3 on 3 version of WarGames.
EXXXTACY69 3 years ago
Vince will do what is right for buiseness. If he can be shown Wargames would be good for buiseness he would book a match called Wargames.
thisherethatthere 3 years ago
well i'm just saying that if many wrestlers went to him with the idea then it might help.
hulk1hogan1 3 years ago
If the two ring thing is a problem for Vince, I would argue that it doesn't absolutely have to be two cages. Like its been said, TNA does Lethal Lockdown every year with 8-10 guys with one ring which is smaller than the standard WWE ring. During the Weekly PPV Era, TNA also put on that "Wednesday Bloody Wednesday" War Games match but with one ring, and it turned out fine.
NYG4LIFE123 3 years ago
I think the taking up seats excuse is a bad one. A rectangular dual ring set-up has a larger perimeter and thus more front row seats, and second row seats behind that, third row seats and so on. You lose by having less seats the furthest back from the ring on the floors. You have more high price front row tickets to make up for less low price back floor tickets. If you charge right (well not right, but effectively) you can stand to make more.
Nic1700 3 years ago
How about wargames with just 1 ring and the new HIAC structure? I mean, the new cell is fucking huge, and the last time we had a multi-man HIAC type thing (I do NOT count DX vs Big Show/Vince/Shane a HIAC match at all) was that awesome 6 man, and I still know people marking out to this day over that match
paradise777lost 3 years ago
WWE should promoted a dvd on the Best Of Wargames . And then they should elimiated the Elimination Chamber and put the Wargames at Survivor Series as a annual event .
darule514 3 years ago
Another thing the WWE has going against it is that they have spent so much time down playing anything with a team aspect to it (Tag Division, Survivor Series) that it would be hard for them to sell a PPV with a Team Battle Main Event, even if it is something as cool as War Games.
NYG4LIFE123 3 years ago
WWE has some factions now and you don't really need alot of factions to do a WarGames match.
EXXXTACY69 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this guy is a loser he is 34 or 35 and he is talking about guys wearing tights, he is as old as my mom and dad
brewersfan67 3 years ago
don't you have some homework to do???
sbhawkins912 3 years ago
how about this idea: message some wrestlers that have a myspace (Matt Hardy, Gregory Helms, etc.) and tell them we want to see Wargames. if alot of people tell wrestlers that we want to see them, one of them is bound to go to Vince or somebody and bring it up. just a thought. would probably work better than a petition.
hulk1hogan1 3 years ago
HHH has tried to get vince to do. if he cant get him to do it no one can
Cmpunkmark101 3 years ago
whats your source?
bedes003 3 years ago
I believe it was a few years ago he tried to get it done with Evolution vs somebody. and I am not shocked he wants to do it he is a flair and horsemen mark
Cmpunkmark101 3 years ago
wwe has alot of good wargames superstars
jeff hardy
evan bourne
rey mysterio
HBK
gregory helms
R truth
matt hardy
the list goes on and on
1vertigodown 3 years ago
quit liven in the past.
WrestlingX 3 years ago
i got to see a wargames @ a local indy by me wich was good to see
but i want to see a wargames in wwe so bad
i think invasion angle
should of been alliance vs wwf to end that feud would of been sweet
WrestlingHandyManInc 3 years ago
With Randy Orton punting the hell out of Vince on Raw and the eventual return of Shane McMahon. I think that a War Games match can occur.
wvang0013 3 years ago
Because if were the one to book it Ill defiantly do it this way. Since Vince has been taken out of the picture. Raw once again solely lies in Stephanies hands, but once Shane returns to take the place of his incapacitated father.
wvang0013 3 years ago
he'll start a feud with Stephanie; by telling her that the only reason she got the Raw job was because she was incumbent; and that their father was afraid of backing down from his throne because he knows Shane will erase him from history by making the WWE better then he can ever make it. This will eventually lead Shane to say that He doesnt have to anymore because hes starting his own 'raslin' business.
wvang0013 3 years ago
Shane would then attempt to split the company in two by taking all taking the superstars that he deems worthy, which would be superstars that are either 2, 3, 4 generation wrestlers; that feel they shouldnt be taking a backseat to no-name wrestlers and that they should be the main event because their fathers built this business. This would then lead to Stephenie feeling that she would have to keep the company intact declaring that Shane be strip of his power before he kills the WWE
wvang0013 3 years ago
This in turn backfires on her because she and Shane are equivalent to one another and that if he gives up his power she must do the same.Feeling that there is no other alternatives left from stopping Shane from succeeding,Stephanie declares a Civil War within the WWE. Stating that:A civil war will destroy us but a civil war is the only thing that can save us.With a civil war being declared a War Games match would defiantly be possible.
wvang0013 3 years ago
Especially if all the superstars on Raw that hold the titles are faces.
Examples: Cena, Punk,...Maybe Cryme Tyme (Since these guys already have problems or past fueds with Orton and Legacy.)
So the war games match would be
Team Raw (CTC and Punk) vs Legacy (Orton, Rhodes, Dibiase, Maybe Harry Smith.)
But the odds this happening is pretty off Especially if Vince has to use two rings, but heres a thought! Why don't they just use to cages instead.(See: Al Snow vs Bossman, Kanel From Hell)
wvang0013 3 years ago
WWE Civil War!
You heard it from me first!!!
wvang0013 3 years ago
wargames was always a excellent match,it would be perfect for survivor series or the other big 4 events
cctitansfan 3 years ago
There are 2 more ways i thought of, WWE could make a more similar to war games match, they could use the chamber, 3 teams in it, 6 chambers, 3 wrestlers start, every minute a wrestler is released from his chamber. It would be a cool match. But if people really wanna see wargames they should make a really big noise that can shake the ground from under vince, e.g. lots and lots of views for war game's matches on youtube/dailymotion/etc, maybe buy the wcw ppv's involving wargames.
Salute.
imheretoraisehell316 3 years ago
I loved WarGames, by far one of the most creative ideas for a match done to date.
SteGuitar7 3 years ago
Wargames is a WCW thing.
Both myself, and I think Vince too, think of it that way.
pspower 3 years ago
Then why would Vince bring back The Great American Bash if that was a WCW thing too. I believe Vince does not want to use The Wargames match because he is not willing to give up seats and money from ticket sales for one match.
valverdejairo 3 years ago
JBL got Vince to bring the Great American Bash back.
EXXXTACY69 3 years ago
I personally feel that WWE missed an opportunity to do War Games several years ago when Evolution was the top stable in the WWE. Many people on the board I post on feel that if they had done War Games back then in the WWE it would have been a good match.
zdunne 3 years ago
I live in philly also im going to lockdown
rkokid89 3 years ago
If Lockdown did really well in sales (PPV Buyrates, Attendance, DVDs) it could be credited to the concept of an all cage PPV in general, and not necessarily out of a desire to see War Games brought.
NYG4LIFE123 3 years ago
The TNA suggestion is redundant. WWE does not give a shit about what TNA does.
WWE doesn't even have any real stables in their company to do a War Games match.
Also, that comment about only seeing the PPV to see the Joe match is pretty funny since the Joe match wasn't even on the PPV.
The Triple H comment to also contradicts what everyone thinks in that Triple H has unlimited backstage power. If he had enough and cared for War Games enough, we would have seen it already then.
MclarryOtto 3 years ago
They could use all 3 brands in the match like a Raw vs Smackdown! vs ECW. I just think, Vince is just keeping the fans in suspense he probably wants it to happen but in like 10 years, just to make it big surprise, if not then when he dies, whoever is incharge could finally book it.
Salute.
imheretoraisehell316 3 years ago
Another agrument AGAINST war games that you didn't mention: The time necessary to set up the cage. There just is no time during a live PPV to set up a cage. I guess they could hang it from the ceiling like HIAC, but there's another expense.
dsalchow 3 years ago
Wargames will never happen in WWE.
MclarryOtto 3 years ago
Did u see Raw from last night?
Rustydoe 3 years ago
You know what I would love to see? I would love to see 1 video where you do not cough, lol.
Fozzitude 3 years ago
Meh, WWE would likely butcher Wargames. The NWA, although at a much, much smaller scale, it does still have Wargames matches. I wouldn't mind seeing ROH give a swing at it, though.
CoreyDavis 3 years ago
if any ppv is in philly, it won't be for awhile, even if it does fall through considering philly is hosting the GREAT AMERICAN BASH
wtfbillanddougsuck1 3 years ago
your an ugly little bitch
Fresnos 3 years ago
with all due respect, do you really think that tna is even on vince's radar? i mean even if lockdown gets a really good buy rate, i don't think vince would even bat an eye...its not like tna is in close competition with wwe
astone08 3 years ago
JR is watching, I'm sure that Vince is. Surely after Angle, Booker T, Foley, Nash, etc have went over there.
Tucanforpres001 3 years ago
but i doubt they are really giving it that much SERIOUS attention...tna is more of an afterthought in their (vince's and jr's) minds
astone08 3 years ago
agreed. the wwe has all sorts of promo and mechandise, and better showings. video games( tna has one game that i heard sucked), wwe shop, promos for upcoming ppv on popular networks, advertising on internet websites, and they have over 14000 people at live events( none ppv) TNA will never be close to the wwe or will never be on vince's radar
wtfbillanddougsuck1 3 years ago
Yeah, and WWE was supposed to win the Monday NIght Wars. WCW didn't even beat WWE in some attendance records and buyrates but still won in ratings and were considered the bigger company. It matters what the company can do. You are talking about TNA which in turn is promoting them. No matter how big a company is, they always watch other companies around them. WCW and WWE did it with ECW, I'm sure WWE does it with TNA today.
Tucanforpres001 3 years ago
for sure the more people wacth WWE more people might wacth TNA and vice versa
saynotodrug999 3 years ago 2
Much less ROH's buyrates Astone...Vince might glance at the numbers if they were astronomical in comparison to their normal buy rates, but I seriously doubt it would pop the idea of bringing wargames back into his head.
mmawrestlefan 3 years ago
yes i agree mmawrestlefan
astone08 3 years ago
They could just do Wargames with One Ring
mysterio1027 3 years ago
mysterio, I agree with you. The only problem is, is the number of wrestlers in the match. I dont think you can have like 8 guys crowded in one cage though.
ultimatedude1 3 years ago
you do know its two rings right? i mean jesus.
Dante1Savage 3 years ago
yes I know its two rings. I was talking to mysterio1027 who said wargames could be done with one ring.
ultimatedude1 3 years ago
They had 6 men in Hell in a Cell. I am sure they could squeze 2 more in there
mysterio1027 3 years ago
yes but, after the 10-15 min mark, the door was ripped off and everybody just started goin all over the place
JUSTWATCHWRESTLING 3 years ago
If vince wants to make money I would think he would do wargames
ultimatedude1 3 years ago
The idea solution would be make Wargames a Hell in a Cell variant. This would not only give it the WWE stamp, but would solve the problem of one ring not having enough space to work in. The best ppv to do it on would surely be Survivor Series.
calvin8hobbs 3 years ago
I heard HHH wants the wargames in wwe I heard
christalkshowrule 3 years ago
I'd love to see the return of War Games.
Thewwekiller 3 years ago
I hate the Lockdown concept because to me it asks way too much of the wrestlers to go out there and have 8 cage matches. I remember when they announced the first one in 2005 and thought "What the fuck?!?!" Ive enjoyed every Lockdown to some degree & I love having Lethal Lockdown, but I still think 8 cage matches in one show is way too much.
IMO, you will get War Games once Vince steps aside & Steph takes over because HHH wants to do it.
NYG4LIFE123 3 years ago
Lockdown is something new. It is a new concept. TNA is smart to make a PPV dedicated to something.WWE had survivor Series being just elimination matches, but have left that tradition over the years that it isn't about Surviving anymore. Be glad TNA is keeping a tradition alive. If they just build feuds to end at Lockdown it will mean more and make more sense.
Tucanforpres001 3 years ago
I understand that & for the most part Lockdown has delivered some really good stuff but I remember when they first announced the concept & hearing interviews with AJ where he said he didnt like it.
Having 8 cages is essentially having 8 main events & that is very hard to pull off & it results in various stinkers to try & make each match different (every LD to date has had at either one over gimmicked match, one stinker, or both)
NYG4LIFE123 3 years ago
Though AJ today and after Lockdown enjoyed it. As for most people involved in it. TNA just needs to not place fillers at the event and it will be better. Have 7 matches total. Lethal Lockdown, Xscape match, and the rest being simple cage matches. All the matches have meaning and there will be no problem. All the belts on the line at the event and ending of major feuds there.
Tucanforpres001 3 years ago
no, tna has wargames. who cares what vince does?
Mr1700 3 years ago
i wish
y2jbrock 3 years ago
Some of the wargames matches were dreadful...
NoBrianNoGain 3 years ago
Nice vid. Not much more for me to say on this. I'm hopinh Lockdown is actually a show worth buying though. I get it for free as it is, but still. TNA has to put work in to be able to actually expand among fans.
KCG013 3 years ago
Jim Ross said in 24/7 edition of LOW
that the need to bring war games to wwe.
If you look at it he brought back GAB
so it's good possiblity of seen it at Survivor Series but te thing is theres no serious factions in wwe to get it popping.
TruStory007 3 years ago
WWE could give it a test run by integrating 1 tribranded WarGames match into Survivor Series. Have your top rivalries play out in this match. This should keep the live crowd into it.
Off the topic:
How about bringing the match of Survivors back to the Survivor Series?
I've always been a fan of rare gimmick matches. World War 3 is something that I would like to see again, but if I looked at it objectively it would be a huge clusterf*ck. If McMahon hates two rings, he'd hate three.
bkstyle82 3 years ago
I don't see them bringing the Survivor's match. I don't understand why they did'nt continue it after 1990. Must've been a time thing. After that Survivor Series they started to add singles matches (and other non traditional SS team elimination matches) to the Survivor Series cards.
steeltownbrown52 3 years ago
*I don't seeing them bringing back the Soul Survivor's match.
Yeah it sucks that it was a one time thing.
steeltownbrown52 3 years ago
what's wargames?
RurouniNall 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
^
dumb ass
WECENANUFF 3 years ago
a SURVIVOR SERES type match with twin ring with a cage that goes around it kind of cool but the cage was small one guy tryed to power bomb a another guy and he hit the guys head on the top of the cage
headbanger641 3 years ago
Sid Vicious powerbomb Brian Pillman into the top of the cage headfirst, then dropping him right on his neck. In 1991.
Whoever thought that was the best way to end that match was silly, especially when Sid's HAIR was touching the roof of the damn cage. Shows you how low that cage really is.
lightning116 3 years ago
Go to Wikipedia and look up War Games match.
steeltownbrown52 3 years ago
Wargames was one of my favorite type of matches... I've kinda always wanted to see it return
Good Video man!
RCage85 3 years ago
Simple solution for me, although it's not quite wargames. You book an eight man Hell in a Cell, with guys entering every five minutes. Match has to go at least a half hour, but it solves a lot of the problems with war games in WWE.
AlexKincaid 3 years ago
wait a minute, lockdown is in philly this year?
JUSTWATCHWRESTLING 3 years ago
Yeah, when was Philly announced as the host for Lockdown?
Fozzitude 3 years ago
ROH has announced concerning te Steel Cage match at the end of the month will be, 5 on 5 Elimination Syle Cage Match. So It's pretty much as Wa Games-Esque as you can get w/o calling it wargames
willierk0 3 years ago
i used to love war games, especially with the nwo. as far as tna getting 100,000 ppv buys, i highly doubt it especially with a lot of the poor acting last year(booker t turning heel LOL).
roger62383 3 years ago
Good video.
dinosauravenger1989 3 years ago
Survivor Series would be a great PPV to have a War Games. Only problem is there prolly won't be any Survivor Series matches.
T Slay if you're a fan of War Games IWA Mid South had one in 2005. Also, I am not too sure if you're into Death Matches but at this years King of the Death Matches Ian announced there will be two rings. Maybe a War Games final.
But anyway good video and I would definitely buy a Best of War Games DVD.
Kuratras 3 years ago
Well Survivor Series has'nt allways been traditional.
steeltownbrown52 3 years ago
A WWE WarGames would make more sense at either No Way Out, One Night Stand or the Great American Bash.
EXXXTACY69 3 years ago
How would you even think about holding Wargames at anywhere BUT the Great American Bash?
unnecesary debate.
scipio2009 3 years ago
when did u get a new camera?
JohnnyTsunami55 3 years ago
I agree,I remmber the funks vs. the Rhodes,I think with TNA's ppv in Philly I think they will have a very good attendance numbers and with every thing so close up their its possible that they could have a lot people who just appreciate awesome wrestling in general
mrtytruthgilles07 3 years ago
they may not need it, but it would be cool to have wargames during the summer
jedisrm 3 years ago
Team Orton vs. Team Samoa (Manu, Sim, and Umaga) vs. Team Edge (Edge, Big Show, Chavo) vs. Team Hardy (Matt, Jeff, and Helms). That would be an awesome wargame. Have 1 on 1, or Tag team matches each week, and have a scoreboard, and the last two teams left can settle it in a 3 on 3 Elimination Cage/HiaC match. PCW did something like that. They called it "Fight Win Survive". I was...pretty awesome.
masterbubu69 3 years ago
lol
scipio2009 3 years ago
another good vid Tslay
PINDAHRELLA 3 years ago