0+0=1.wmv

[MrMinecraftDude796]

so you're saying I can make anything I like out of not two of those things

[bowinciii]

How can you contract something from nothing?

[TheHitman2500]

So if I have 0 apples and then get another 0 apples I get 1 apple? :)

[TheCreakyo]

People sorry for my english but is the line of fabonacci known to you??? Because It is

[ChickenSquabble]

Hmmm... when I shove a 0 sideways into my butthole, which is also shaped like a 0, it thins out into a 1... thus 0 + 0 = 1... Now I get it! Genius!!!

[BDMachinimas]

I have 0 apples. I get 0 more. I have 1 now!

[19copilot]

Thank you for showing us your 1st grade math test that you epicly failed on.

[TransonicProductions]

when did 0 stop meaning nothing?

[1Pantikian]

@TransonicProductions precisely when it lost its meaning and therefore meant nothing

[TransonicProductions]

@1Pantikian so basically, 0 started meaning nothing after it was decided that it had no meaning because it was nothing. 0 meant something that was nothing but now its nothing that means something. So then you see... ah... screw it, lets just play some video games ;D

[LeazesFoster]

By this rational surely 0+1=1.5...or am i seriously missing something

[ilikezappa]

Is this the Kent Hovind skool of science?

[bmanyugioh7]

It was obvious that GOD created the first one out of 0 and 0! XD )o(

[Dragorpion777]

i see a Fibonacci sequence!!!

[Toaderiffic]

@videakias3000 Positive X does kNot equal Negative X ever, kNot even with Zero, since Zero has no polarity! Where did you learn such bad math?

Ribbit :)

[MrXenitha]

@Toaderiffic He didn't have to say 0 had a sign. the statement x=-x is true and only true for when x=0, factoring out x proves that 0 still have no sign:

x=-x

1(x)=-1(x)

x can equal -x if and only if x=0

[rich1051414]

@videakias3000 No, dividing by 0 is never ok to do. Since x = 0, x/x is an invalid equation. Anything divided by zero is infinity. You cannot 'trick' math by substituting the invalid 0 with a imaginary placeholder of x and expect it to magically avoid this rule :P

[videakias3000]

@rich1051414

I know that,that was a joke comment,besides withe the same techic I could make 0/0= with every nomber I wanted

[MrXenitha]

@videakias3000 That is not true:

x=0 Correct

2x=0 Correct

x=-x Correct

x/x=-1  Incorrect, you cannot divide by zero

0/0 remains undefined

[WeirdGuy261]

Can someone explain to me how this proves that 0+0=1 ? I can't seem to understand this.

[Toaderiffic]

@WeirdGuy261 in answer to your question of how can 0 + 0 = 1 is explained by the answer to this Riddle:

Naught-Knot Riddle

If you are thoUght naUght

And I am kNot thoUght

Then Now is Then

And Then is When

What y0u and eYe can't be taUght

Ribbit :)

[gerbil1234]

@WeirdGuy261 It doesn't, work from the bottom upwards and you'll realise when he had

0 + 1 =1 and then went to 0 + 0 =1 he minused one from the left hand side of the equation but not the right hand side :P.

[Awesometbw9]

@tdjdk Okay that makes sense but on that basis this video could be used just as effectively to ridicule the current theory of the big bang i.e nothing plus nothing equals explosion creating everything in perfect harmony and order. So then essentially this video is nothing short of pointless as anyone could take it and make it ridicule the beliefs or thoughts of anyone.

[tdjdk]

I think the argument of the video is that if your premise is incorrect (i.e. god exists), you can use that premise to prove ANYTHING (although, you only prove it to yourself, as the premise of the premise is that you accept the premise, inspite of empirical inquiry and observed reality) - Skeptical thinkers do NOT accept unsubstantiated claims as premise or as being evident when lacking evidence - for that you need religious fanaticism - hence the ridiculous notion of 0+0 = 1. Just guessing

[cassiesmum]

Back off with the corrections on how to spell wether in upper case or lower case...upper case spelling of maths just puts emphasis on the correct spelling. And isnt dumb ass an American form of slang? and no its freaking,I will leave the bad language to you abusers of English from over the pond.Get over it! You can call it what you want,but be prepared to be corrected!

[4ingP]

@cassiesmum *whether

*isn't

*dumbass

You meant to ask if "dumbass" is American slang.

"Freaking" isn't necessary to communicate your point. If you don't want to use profanity, don't use anything to replace the words.

Also, it's improper to begin sentences with "and". You should also capitalize the first letter of every sentence.

Now, what were you saying about the beautiful English language?

[cassiesmum]

@4ingP I will replace words with none swearing words...its a well mannered thing to do!First I heard with not starting a sentence with and..like I said..get over yourself..

[4ingP]

@cassiesmum Or you could not use ANY words that suggest swearing. No fucking, no freaking, no frikken, etc. If you say "You're ruining the fucking English language" and "You're ruining the freaking English language", you're saying the SAME THING. It's well mannered to avoid those words and any words like them altogether.

[4ingP]

@cassiesmum Sentences cannot be started with conjunctions because conjunctions are used to link two sentences together. One cannot link two sentences together at the beginning of a sentence.

You never told me to "get over myself".

You're one of those people from the UK who "could care less" about proper English, but then criticize people from the US for spelling certain words differently.

[lek844]

@4ingP But it is an accepted style that is used to show emphasis, contrast, or disagreement. See, I just did it. Think of it as taking a compound sentence, putting a period before the conjunction, and then capitalizing the conjunction. Sometimes, especially when using "but," it is almost a necessity, because you may be qualifying a whole paragraph, not just the immediately preceding sentence. This is not incorrect grammar, and it is used by all good and great writers and conversationalists.

[4ingP]

@lek844 I know it's accepted, I use it most of the time. I wasn't correcting her English because it was bad. I was correcting it because she accused one of my countrymen/women for ruining the "beautiful English language" when she was speaking worse English.

By the way, she started her sentence with "and". It's like how "whom" is being replaced by "who". It's commonplace, but still improper. English hasn't evolved yet (or regressed, considering this generation's near illiteracy).

[lek844]

@4ingP I used to be a real stickler for "proper usage," because I believed that reasoning required the use of language (much as computers need a language or OS). So, if you used bad grammar or had a weak vocabulary, then your reasoning ability would be impaired. I've learned, however, that this view is incorrect, and that language is merely a tool of communication. So, now I'm pretty tolerant of any usage which is sufficient to get the point across.

[4ingP]

@lek844 It is true, though. There are some exceptions, but generally, a person's command of their native language is directly related to how intelligent they are overall.

Take the phrase "could care less", for example. Whenever it's used, it's intended to express disinterest, however it expresses the opposite sentiment.

[4ingP]

@lek844 In general, you see smart people speaking English well (no matter if it isn't their first language) and stupid people speaking horrible English (such as this lady from the UK who is defending the "beautiful English language" with English that makes you want to put a bag over its metaphorical head and enter with its back facing you).

[lek844]

@4ingP "Whom" is still one of my buggaboos, too. And the use of "awesome" to mean anything between "spectacular" and "surprising." Or changing nouns into verbs, as in "we partnered" for "we became partners." Or making up unnecessary words, like "pro-active" to mean "active." So, don't misunderstand me, I still believe that a command of language enhances communication, especially of complex, nuanced ideas. I used very poor grammar in this post, but I'll bet you got the point clearly.

[MetalDoneMoreForME]

0 isn't a number at all but rather the absence of a number. 0 = NaN (not a number)

[MetalDoneMoreForME]

@MetalDoneMoreForME so how can absence + absence = existence?

[lek844]

@MetalDoneMoreForME No, zero is a number. In fact, it is an integer.

[CluckcluckPow]

0+0 does not equal 1. after the 0's begins the Fibonacci sequence which is the addition of two successive integers to get the next. 0+1 = 1. 1+1=2. 2+1=3. 3+2=5. 5+3=8. and so on. The integer 0 is not included in the Fibonacci sequence I'm just showing it there prove a point. The person who made the video just put it there to mess with someones mind.

[ipod3755]

Fuck all you smart shits. All that Fibonacci sequence stuff. All I know is 0+0=0. So yeah :]

[CoolCat123450]

0+0=1. Well, you learn something new everyday

[cassiesmum]

Its freaking MATHS not math you stupid dumb ass Americans and your stupid dumb ass abuse of the beautiful English language!!!!

[ixsetf]

@cassiesmum I can call it math if I want, it doesn't make me stupid. I can call it math, maths, matemáticas, wiskunde, or even 数学, and it would still be the same.

[MetalDoneMoreForME]

@cassiesmum dumb = the inability of speech, ass = cross between a donkey and a mule. learn the english language for yourself.

[jollincones]

@cassiesmum Really, where do you live that maths is spelled in all capital letters? You aren't the best spokesperson for the English language. You ought to learn how to punctuate a damned sentence before you defend the "beautiful English language". Also, it's fucking not "freaking". Do it right or don't do it at all.

[ChicLawChick]

@jollincones anyone noticed cassiesmum spelled "whether" without an "h"?

[DarkPhthaloGreen]

The first equation should of course be 1 + 0 = 1. The extended Fibonacci sequence is ... -8, 5, -3, 2, -1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, ...

So, if you want to keep going backwards, you'll get -1 + 1 = 0, 2 + (-1) = 1, and so on. The video is utterly pointless, but hopefully you learned something from this comment.

[1Pantikian]

@DarkPhthaloGreen lol thanks

[TimJSwan89]

@DarkPhthaloGreen Awesome! You extended the sequence along the other direction of the number line. I don't think I've seen that with the Fibonacci function before. Now, I'm curious, what's a function that will hold true to all the integers but continuous with real numbers? (For example, as the gamma function is to the factorial function)

[DarkPhthaloGreen]

@TimJSwan89 You can create such a function by solving the recurrence relation F(n) = F(n-1) + F(n-2), with F(0) = 0 and F(1) = 1. If you do so, you'll get that F(n) = (Φ^n - φ^n)/sqrt(5), where Φ = (1+sqrt(5))/2 = 1.618... (the golden mean), and φ = (1-sqrt(5))/2 = -0.618... (the golden mean's little brother). Try it out! So, for example, F(6) = (1.618...^6 - (-0.618...)^6)/sqrt(5) = 8, as expected. Then, if you like, the "halfth" Fibonacci number is F(0.5) ≈ 0.5688644 - 0.3515775 i.

[anubispatchTV]

And god looked down upon the people and said 'WHAT THE F#CK IS THIS SH#T"

[garrythomas2009]

@anubispatchTV ha ha ha awesome comment i never normally leave comments but just had to i nearly fell off my chair !

[CommanderFux]

nothing + nothing is again nothing

[Akrag75]

EPIC FAIL

[MangoTux]

0+0 =/ 1.

This is called the Fibonacci sequence, where n iteration is equal to iterations n-1 + n-2.

1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21

[bySpyder]

that stpid if 0 + 0 = 1 and u move the one to the left side the equation becomes 0-1 = 0 not 0 + 1 = 1

[jewcyfrewt]

You're just adding. This doesn't mean anything but stupidity, coz 0 + 0 = 0 and wouldn't fit in that pattern.

[semantyk]

0+0=0 

[givemeajackson]

i dont get it...

[fenixgin11]

fuerte lo suyo...

[IllidanS4]

What number is 1.wmv?

[iRoxorzUrSoxorz]

how the fuck is 0+0=1? maybe hes trying to say something cant come from nothing, like to disprove evolution? either way this shit belongs on a pdf, not youtube

[fighder2]

1 picture for 32 seconds, with no music or anything, thumbs up if u think this is interesting, oh wait, it never will be

[MegaMabas]

well first of all 0+0=1 isn't an equation because an equation needs to have an unknown variable like"x" 0+0=1 is just a false mathematical expretion so it's false from the begining

[MsNikkinator]

@PsytranceMan777

0/0=1?

no.

you cannot divide by zero.

0/0= undefined.

bye.

[igoregin]

@MsNikkinator Indeed, 0/0 equals every number. PROOF:

Let 0/0=1, then 0=1*0, 0=0, True. You can put every number instead of 1 but result ain't gonna change.

[OrcGy]

u mad bro

[bakersteven3]

After the 0+0=1 nonsense, the rest is just Fibonaccis series, eg 1,2,3,5,8,13,21,34,55, 89,...golden ration, so just a stolen idea put ont he web. that';s SOOO unusual !!lol

[YukoValis]

hmm close. See the religious minded believe 1+0=2. One god created something out of nothing and now there is god and earth. Which doesn't make sense.

[roanhaggar1996]

This proves nothing though... I was at least hoping for some clever explanation as to why it was right... :(

[AiDz0r]

if 0+0=1 then 1+1=0

[XX15214]

0 + 0 = 1 ARE YOU MAD ??

[theroachification]

How exactly does 0+0=1?

[dengel3587]

I c wut u did thar...

Sorry, but Fibonacci numbers don't work like that.

[unamaxify]

0 + 0 = 1

-> you're going to math-hell for this one

[Qldroarfan94]

This maths is so wrong.

[nissimang14]

To save 32 seconds of your life:

See the dislikes bar

Rate this comment as the top comment (so everyone will see)

Dislike the video

Go to another video

Congratulations! you have saved 32 seconds of your life!

[tassay]

@nissimang14 in this case you are right. but often good mathematical prooves have a big dislike bar, because all the idiots who dont understand dislike it

[YMIamazing]

@nissimang14 and by reading this you have wasted about .. lets say .. 32 , perhaps ?

[Phaedron777]

0+0=8

[Rikisven]

no intellect + no intellect = intellect? this video proves itself wrong.

[IrateNub]

wait hold on. Look at the equalization of it, the sums of it all.

0+0=1

0+1=1

1+1=2

1+2=3

2+3=5

3+5=8

Look at how the sum's go up, increased gradually, +1, +1, +2, +3, would that mean 0+1 is actually 0.5, and 0+0 is 0?

Therefore mathmaticians are actually ROUNDING! 0+!

[IrateNub]

@IrateNub 0+1*

[NathanEvansComposer]

die.

[SirFlitwick]

This is disgusting.

[sexking83]

hahahahah

[lek844]

I've looked at many of the comments and have gained no insight as to the purpose of this video. It is true that the first equation is incorrect, and by omitting it, it shows a Fibonacci sequence. But there is no math "problem" demonstrated by the video, as there is neither anything to be solved nor contradiction to be explained. Moreover, I don't see any implications here regarding theology. Sorry, I just don't get it. Am I missing something?

[stephensof1]

@lek844 think its something to do with evolution

[difficultsyllables]

Your parents must be really proud. Jk they probably think your a low life piece of shit and they want absolutely nothing to do with you. I don't blame them.

[omfgzgon]

actually last one should be

-1+0=1, so obviously we should put every sum at absolute value.

You're welcome.

Best regards

Not Christian.

[omfgzgon]

@omfgzgon i mean, first... no matter. :D

[DEAGLESnipezzxxx]

MY NAME IS WHAT MY NAME IS WHAT KAZEGREATREX THE 3RD trolololol

[kennethkrist]

If you were able to write those numbers and think that what you wrote is "true" in any way you should probably go study some more... Cus you failed at the very beginning of the Fibonacci sequence... It doesn't start with two zeroes... It starts with 0 followed by 1, those are the first 2 numbers.. There aint no zero before that...

[Chiewkovsky]

wat de fuck is this? my 6 years old cousin knows 0+0+0, to be christian makes u dumb!

[mew905]

congratulations on figuring out the Fibonacci sequence...

[gwagblade]

0+0=0... END OF DEBATE

[bleesev2]

0+0 = 0...

[Aaron5464]

What came to me is God can take something of absolutely no value, and make it useful for something. Thanks for increasing my faith! Praise God!

[yko487]

@Aaron5464 ...and this proud stupidity is why i'm not a christian.

[Aaron5464]

@yko487 I'm not proud, I'm glad. I'd be a fool for Christ any day.

[yko487]

@Aaron5464 Well you're quite good at it.

[Aaron5464]

@yko487 Why thanks, I plan on keeping it up for the rest of my life with Jesus Christ

[AQWraghd99]

this is freaking stupid

[PsytranceMan777]

If anything divided by itself is 1...

Then what's 0 / 0? :trollface:

[panosthegreat1]

@PsytranceMan777 u can not divide sth with 0 its simple math rules omg ...zZzzzzzzZz

[PsytranceMan777]

@panosthegreat1

In theory, you CAN divide by zero by a nonzero number; resulting in infinity. For the number of times you can fit zero into a nonzero number is infinite; you can do it over and over again for an infinite (or in other words, "undefined") number of times.

But in real life, you cannot divide by zero with a nonzero number because it is impossible to have infinity in real life; you would always need a higher value than you give it.

[PsytranceMan777]

@PsytranceMan777

As for dividing ZERO by zero, it would be 1; for any value divided by itself is 1, because you can fit the exact same value into itself one time.

[protoborg]

@PsytranceMan777 Actually, NOTHING can be divided by 0. It is undefined term, hence "a divide by zero error". Also, if you did divide 0 by 0, you would get 0 as 0/anything = 0.

[Noise509]

@protoborg anything can be divide by 0. The answer will always be infinity. If you multiply by 0, the answer is always 0, so the opposite procedure (division) must also be applicable, and the answer will always be the opposite of 0, which is infinity.

The only reason people will tell you that it's impossible to divide by 0 is because calculators can't handle infinity, so it shows an ERROR instead.

[MCwhiteywhitewhite]

@PsytranceMan777 after careful analysis of the comments on this page I have concluded that PysytanceMan777 has the most likely legitimate answer.

[MadMonkeyCo]

@meddelhed It starts at 0 and 1

[MrStuff414]

wtf is this piece of crap?

[PsytranceMan777]

@MrStuff414

It's the Fibonacci Sequence, but it should start with "0/0", THEN "0+1".

[MegaKeeDee]

WTF a lightsaber

oh noes its the dislike bar.

[Game117Fanatic]

0+0=0

0= nothing so nothing+nothing=nothing...

[djCHUCKS7]

you defo work in an irish bank ;L

[999JAMES999]

@djCHUCKS7 tellin ya lad

[BIGWUNuvDbunch]

lol 666 dislikes :P keep it that way, Satan commands the

[TheKylesauce]

That's not the big bang or christianity. That's Fibonacci, bro.

If 0 + 0 = 1, then following the rules of addition, either 0 = 1 or 0 = 1. Since 0 = 0, then both 0 and 0 = 1.

Thusly, 0 + 0 = 2, so you're wrong.. at being wrong.

[MsFernan3]

0 NO ES NADA APRENDE

[TakeADumpOnUrChest]

this is a poor atempt to describe the big bang, your concepts can not apply, it is much different

[Sahrinzs]

The fibbo series doesnt start at 0 but at 1.

[hexonatapeloop]

The way that the equations are lined up on the page is mathematically irrelevant, all you need to look at are the individual equations, and the top two are wrong, that's all there is to it.

[80NameLess]

fibonacci...

[xDannyDamn]

I am pointing at my genetals

[FireMarioFireLuigi61]

0+0=0

0=Empty

Empty+Empty=Empty

[cowleshome]

geezus how many non thinking monkey lovers we got in here... the point is that you can't make something from nothing you evolutionary reactionary ding dongs go get a different religion... other than evolution... oh because since there is no scientific data to back up your still "theory" of evolution it takes assumption and blind faith to believe in it, so ya it's a religion, and in my opinion it takes a lot more faith to believe in some guy's fantasy that something came from nothing than GOD

[johnchoobe]

@cowleshome You Sir, are a penis

[idliketobeatree]

Not sure if serious or troll...

[josh74747474]

That doesnt prove a damn thing. If you add nothing to nothing you get nothing. If you add nothing to 1 you get 1.. zero isnt a number so you cant treat it like just another number, zero is the absence of a number..

[TheDBZisepic]

0 = 1, ok so put 1 for every time you see 0. 0 + 3 = 3. Evaluate 0. 1 + 3 = 3. Wrong! If mathematicians came together and said that 0 = 1, no math problem will be true, and thus everything will be false. So, 0 does not equal 1 for math's sake.

[maqrux]

this is so disturbingly stupid that you know only a master-troll could have invented it

[lacontes1]

I might be consider a christian, but im not religious. I beleive in GOD, Jesus, The Holy Spirit!

[lacontes1]

0^0=1

[ISIandvviicIHI]

you got the first problem wrong. nothing plus nothing is still nothing.... if i have 0 apples and i get 0 more apples i still have no apples. #ugay

[hackum1]

I don't get it.

[gfunkhomie310]

All I saw was 0+0=1 and i didnt waste anymore of my time. this is simply moronic.

[lentus88]

@gfunkhomie310 But you wasted enough time typing on here that you didnt want to waste your time. Even with the title telling you everything you didnt want to waste your time with, you just felt you need to put your pointless pinion across?

[anonymous2012x]

@gfunkhomie310 My first thought

[teamjinx]

@kernelist1 Funny shit. I literally laughed out loud

[TehManuaL]

@teamjinx dude your a shame you stole a clan name..

[teamjinx]

Zero exists as much as any other number does. Zero is the additive identity in a ring.

[effortless35]

Wow, great find. I thought about this and realized that 5+0=1 too. The proof is EXACTLY THE SAME. Also works with (happiness)+0=1. I think you might be on to something greater than you realized.

[anxez]

HOLY FUCK!!! This man can write numbers on the page!!

All math must be wrong! We need to start over!

[DiaboloProductions]

u missed out 4, 6 and 7

[Triipticz]

Just because it looks nice on the page doesn't make it true...

[michaeldcurry1]

This is like the thing that says 1=2 if because if you do 1/0 (impossible) and 2/0 (also impossible) then 1=2. You are using mathematical theorems that are not legal.

[kernelist1]

LOL 0+0=1 mean --> no money on pocket + no saving on bank = at least you still got hope ROLF

[FireMarioFireLuigi61]

@kernelist1 At 0+0=0

No money

No penny

NO CASH!!!!!!!

[Louism247]

I see a scooner

[SergeiFragov]

trollin

[rlh661]

you wrote 0+0=1, then 0+1=1, as if they're the same thing.

[BPMification]

Oh dear, you stole Darth Vader's lightsaber...

[lobsidedballs]

NIGGA YOU SAD STUPID!

[LaPecado]

∅ this is the answer

[Dontrotatemybrain]

its actually 9....

[Redflowers9]

I should hope not.

[matrixphijr]

0 + 0 = 1

0 + 1 = 1

What an idiot.

[CobaltMC]

I don't understand how this is against Christianity...

[Impossibletomorrow]

@CobaltMC its a joke... 0 doesn't exist... Christianity relies on your faith of something you can't prove to exist... to actually exist... so... 0+0=1

I just understand the joke but... not really funny though

[jmedinaTube]

2=1+1=0+1+1=0+0+1+1=1+1+1=3