Nice. I like David. Here's the funny thing about the Barracuda. Nothing is ever her fucking fault. Doug Hoffman got smoked and it wasn't her fault. McZombie got smoked last November and it wasn't her fault. She quit being the governor of Alaska for reasons unknown until her booked dropped. What, she could run a state that has less people living in it than an L.A. and write a book at the same time?
Mslsd fair and balanced horse shit. Not like they have a "Pimped Out" agenda or their crappy "news stars" don't get booted off presidential debate coverage. Keith Overbite's 8 minute rant over Bobby Kennedy and Hillary Clinton made me quit watching MSLSD and eventually made me Independant from voting Democrat for the first time in 20 years..now I look at the network as some progressive statist shit hole. VIVA La GE!
MSNBC is clearly scared of Sarah Palin otherwise they woud not trash on her. She poses a threat to the libs and their agenda. If she was such a bad candidate they would let her run and easily get beaten , but they know the truth and they are scared so they make up shit and take things out of contents
larry, how true ! the democrats continue to hammer away at Palin because they are afraid of her. David Letterman has NOW the National Org of Women against him for his insults about her 14 yr old daughter
I prefer conservatives or anyone who is honest and says they are giving their opinion. But, David Shuster presents himself as a jounalist and is so biased and opinionated in his reporting. I agree with John Zeigler that Palin was treated extreemly unfairly this past election. The moment she was announced as John McCains Vice Presidential candidate she was demonized by most of the media. Meredith Viera of NBC comes to mind when she did a whole segment on Palins daughers pregnancy.
omg that idiot Shuster would ask the guy questions then he wouldn;'t even let him answer. He lost all credibility with me from the getgo. That was seriously rude.. No wonder MSNBC's rating are in the toilet.. Why shout over your guests? Typical angry liberal.
They always do this jack. MSNBC has the fewest alternative voices (conservatives) of any network, there is practically none. The very rare occasian were they put one on, they either A. Pwn the hell out of the lib on there (whoever it is for the hour), and there never invite them back or like you said B. Talk over them and let them get in as little as possible, and end the conversation quickly. Its no suprise there ratings suck yes, but it really is a suprise they have any viewers at all.
I don't see it that way, I see it more that Shuster was trying to keep Ziegler on point. However, here's my question; do you like O'Reilly? If you do than you are bias because Mr O' Reilly does the same thing. Don't forget that Fox started all of that kind of stuff? and remeber there are always three sides to the truth!!
When did O'Reilly say he grew up in a "tough" or "rough" neighborhood? He said he grew up in Levitttown, LI, which was a lower middle class town of post-war cookie cutter houses. He called it modest, but never "tough" or "rough" as you claim.
he has said several times in the past that he would keep dealing with bullies and getting in fights in his old neighborhood and he would be walking to school and people would try and beat him up. if i had a video proof of it, i could prove it, but i cant supply that. but i have seen it on his show and heard it on the radio as well.
Shuster said at the end that John Ziegler was "welcome back anytime." But said nothing about whether he would be permitted to say anything without being shouted down once again by Shuster. I know that Shuster (after being released by the successful cable news network) now works for the Tingle Up the Leg network, but he reveals his obvious fear of being revealed ignorant every time he shouts Ziegler down. But by shouting down your guest, you reveal that you were raised by wolves.
"But said nothing about whether he would be permitted to say anything without being shouted down once again by Shuster."
the same thing should be cleared up by bill oreilly when he brings guests on his show. he only invites guests to come back on the show when he likes them... not ones that give him a good debate.
"I know that Shuster (after being released by the successful cable news network) now works for the Tingle Up the Leg network"
sorry, fox news is not a successful cable news network.
"But by shouting down your guest, you reveal that you were raised by wolves."
once again, the same thing should be said about bill oreilly. however, im sure oreilly was raised by hyenas in his tough little town that he grew up in. wow... i would hate to live in that rough neighborhood. what a joke.
success is not signified just by ratings and profit... you also have to considered legitimate and taken seriously, which fox news is neither. they are simply a conservative propaganda machine repeating the same talking points that republicans do. everything that benefited bush for the past 8 years, they took marching orders to get his back and help him stay in office. sure, they were successful in that regard, but they arent successful as far as performance and good journalism.
Fox News is a success in every meaningful sense, your arrogation of a proprietary definition of "success" notwithstanding.
Or did you actually think that the liberal media would bestow awards like Pulitzer upon a fair and balanced outlet, such as Fox News? After all, Fox News SEEMS conservative only in contrast to all the universally liberal, legacy outlets.
If you want good, honest journalism, watch "Special Report" at 6pm. But that's only if you're open to fair and balanced reporting.
lmao, "Fox News is a success in every meaningful sense"... wow how far do you have your nose up rupert murdochs ass crack there buddy? you might want to pull it out and smell a little dose of reality. the only thing fox news has success in is spreading republican propaganda and spewing bush talking points. that is all they have and all they will ever have to lean on. oh here we go with stupid paranoia... the complaining of the evil "liberal media"... for god sakes get over it. its gotten so old.
what do you call limbaugh, beck, oreilly, malkin, coulter, gibson, hannity, levin, and hewitt in the "liberal media"? are they not part of it with their millions of listeners/viewers? you idiots brag about those ratings but you ignore how much more influence they have than the rest of the "liberals" on nbc, cnn, abc, cbs, etc. its ridiculous and completely contradicts your idiotic statements. stop ignoring the conservative media and how much the far right spreads its opinion. you are a moron.
lmao oreily is not an independent, he only claims to be. hannity is a far right lunatic conservative, and chris wallace is biased towards the republicans as much as any other anchor on that channel. what makes him a democrat exactly? according to wallace himself, he WAS a democrat for over 20 years and admits to voting for candidates from both parties. so using that logic, then chris matthews should be considered a republican since he (admittedly) voted for bush in 2000.
just because someone is registered as a democrat or republican, it doesnt mean that is what they are. wallace himself said that being a democrat is the only possible way of being involved in the political process in the big democratic environment of washington, d.c.
once again, using your ridiculous logic that means matthews is a republican because he voted for bush, olbermann is nothing because he doesnt vote, and maddow is a liberal.
RayBoylan--GET READY FOLKS...RAY BOYLAN will again enlight us all with his IMMATURE & TOTALLY IRRELEVANT COMMENTS.
As it is customary to this FOXNEWS BRAINWASHED RACIST & HOMOPHOBE LOSER, he'll spew his RATPUBLICAN PROPAGANDA ... as if we are in the least interested.
MSNBC is a left-wing network. Some people have been living under a rock for so long not to realize that.
Are you going to sit here and tell me that the Liberal Trio: Chris Matthews, Keith Olbermann and Rachel Maddow simply do not have a liberal bias? Don't bullshit me...I'm waiting for the day when Olbermann has an opposing viewpoint on his show.
nobody is denying that olbermann, maddow, and matthew have bias, just as much as oreilly hannity and wallace have bias as well. olbermann has plenty of opposing viewpoints on his show... just because hes not yelling back and forth with his guests like they do on fox noise doesnt mean that there is no disagreement. get it right, idiot.
I don't care what side of the spectrum you fall on. If you are a rational thinking person then you know Palin was wholly unqualified to be VP. I hope she crawls back to the Alaskan obscurity from which she was plucked.
GET READY KIDS I AM SURE OUR FAVORITE SAVANT LIBROPHILE IS ABOUT TO GENERATE AND EXCRETE ONE OF HIS FAMOUS ANAGRAMS LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL
Somebody get this moron to the electro-shock room.
No you are not "good" You posted to this thread over 20 times in 2 days. With disjointed comments like even moderate dems think MESSNBC went over the line, "Thomas"? Zeigler is a sycophant propping up Palin and my favorite -
GstateBALLER925 (3 days ago) tom zeigler is a far right conservative cock sucker who absolutely LOVES to lick palins juicy cunt... what a pathetic puppy dog he is
Do I want to go cry? No GState cying is for 22year old virgins who live in mom's basement. Get a life.
no really, im good, thanks. wow... 20 times huh? you actually took time out of your lonely day to count all of my comments? um... that might as well be stalking. what are you going to do next? find out my measurements and interests and try to flirt with me? yeah... id hold off on the creepy research that youve got planned, buddy. youre already looking like a fag. yes you do... go cry, flamer. enjoy the tears. lmao me a virgin? i get more pussy than you have a chance at getting dick. good luck.
RayBoylan--GET READY FOLKS...RAY BOYLAN will again enlight us all with his IMMATURE & TOTALLY IRRELEVANT COMMENTS.
As it is customary to this FOXNEWS BRAINWASHED RACIST & HOMOPHOBE LOSER, he'll spew his RATPUBLICAN PROPAGANDA ... as if we are in the least interested.
What is funny is that when Hillary Clinton complained about sexusim during her campiagn with Obama Palin said that Hilary was whininng when she talk about it to the media. Hillary should become stronger and prove herself instead of playing victum. Now Palin goes through the same thing and she doesn't realize that she sounds like whinning and playing victum. Well what comes around goes around.
The difference is that Palin waited until after the election was over to make her complaints heard. She isn't "playing the victim" to get votes. She didn't cry on cue like Hillary. She has legit complaints about how the media treated her and her family. All but the most blind see MSNBC's problems. But of course the media in general doesn't do well at turning an eye on itself to expose its problems and lack of ethics. They certainly aren't going to let some little female governor question them.
And WHY does Fox have more viewers? Because all of the other networks are bias left wing and do not report any "real news". If they weren't so bias and reported bullshit all of the time then maybe there would be more equality across the board. Get a clue. Yes, Obama did attend a Madrassa and I didn't get that from FOX; I saw the document myself, his religion was signed in as "ISLAM".
David Shuster invites this film maker on to talk over him because he and MSNBC don't want to hear the truth. Watch the interview in its entirety people and judge for yourself. The left-wing talking heads are twisting America.
Shuster takes Palin's comment out of context even in this interview. She was not complaining about the documentary in her press release but reporters like Shuster who were twisting the tone and content of the documentary.
MSNBC is on the defensive now and have even enlisted their staff to comment on every Sara Palin article and video to sway the publics view on their horrible onesided and malicious reporting during the election.
Palin was a fucking retard and still is, but who the fuck cares? Go back to stuffing moose--but this time stuff your ugly fucking-wanna-be-celebrity-over-inflated talking head up it's ass and chow down bitch! You are a loser just like Crusty McAnus!!!
Speaking of that ho Obama's mama, who's house was she posing nude in with a xmas tree (not Obama Sr.'s house since he is Muslim) -Nat King Cole & Stan Kenton Records in view for a photographer who developed his own photos?
Answer Key: Wanna Wiki the Jazz & photography enthusiast John Marshall Davis?
RightWingPalin? MSM must be where you got all of your information. I don't think the Libertarian party would have endorsed her for Govenor of AK but you know more then her. Oh, she's a Christian...ah, that must be it. She's pro-life, oh, btw there are Dems that didn't vote for Obama because of his kill babies stance even if they survive abortions; so their far right too?
I mean, are these people even real? Look at him, he doesn't look real, he looks like some sort of pre-packaged robot. Where the fuck do people like him even come from? I grew up around normal people and I never knew anyone like this-he's weird. I don't accept him as a normal human being.
Can you picture Old Man McCain and Hockey Mom Sarah Palin trying to deal with this economic crisis, and this Israel situation?
Thank God the media asked those questions. If she WAS allowed to be just a smiling cardboard cut-out, I'm sure they would have gotten a lot more votes.
It's dangerous of politicians to think it's okay to complain about the media questioning them. Very dangerous precedent. Obama went on Bill O'reilly and dealt with bullshit-but did he bitch about it? No. He beat Billo.
He went on OReilly but his party would not allow a debate to be aired on Fox. OReilly wasn't giving any bullshit to him. In fact Obama showed a personal side that was lacking everywhere else. Remember he is the one who said he wouldn't vote for himself based on Fox News' coverage of him and he was as obsessed with Hannity as Keith Overbite (Countdown to Zero Ratings) is with OReily.
The media on all sides is in the tank for or against someone. The best days of journalism sadly are over
Ask an Obama drone if they could name 3 in depth stories that were positive about Palin. Then wait for a response. Remember Palin has an approval rating in Alaska of 80% percent. Also ask an Obama drone to name three in depth stories by the media that were negative about Obama, then again watch their expression and wait for a response. In both cases they won't be able to answer both questions. If anything they will attack you for daring to ask them in the first place.
I love how the douchebag decided to title this: "Shuster V, Right Wing Palin Film Maker". How about "John Ziegler interviewed by Pro-Obama Left Wing Talking Head"
A commedian once qwipted: 'There are two kinds of people, those who like Neil Diamond, and those who can't stand him.' - apparently it's the same with Sarah Palin. Being a fan of Palin, I take great deligh in the aggitation she causes people like Shuster - he was really excited in his antagonism. And note also that he never refuted the accusation that MSNBC was biased! How could anyone refute it? That game is over.
A commedian once qwipted: 'There are two kinds of people, those who like Neil Diamond, and those who can't stand him.' - apparently it's the same with Sarah Palin. Being a fan of Palin, I take great deligh in the aggitation she causes people like Shuster - he was really excited in his antagonism. And note also that he never refuted the accusation that MSNBC was biased! How could anyone refute it? That game is over.
Fox News is so incredibly conservative it's sad. It essentially is brainwashing. Their lineup now is O'Reilly, Beck, Hannity. Three conservatives in a row.
And MSNBC is as pure as the wind driven snow. ABC,CBS,NBC are stacked with liberals. CNN has cleaned up MOST of it's act, but still leans slightly to the left. All conservatives have is Fox News and you want to complain about it? I am a MODERATE, but think that if Liberals have their networks, there is NOTHING wrong with conservatives having thiers.
True, there are many more conservative commentators on Fox, but Fox's coverage of the election was the most fair of any network. The other networks pushed a much higher percentage of negative stories about McCain/Palin than they did Obama/Biden (I think MSNBC was 80/20), while Fox had a 50/50 ratio of negative campaign stories. Complain all you want about the commentators, but you gotta admit that they were more fair than any other network this election season in terms of negative coverage.
no, THIS just proves that right wing sycophants like thomas zeigler need to find better things to do than try and prop up sarah palin as a pinnacle of conservatism.
there is no defense for any of the media you moron. how are you going to defend fox news? "they are fair and balanced"... "they arent the obama network"... "they actually debate compared to olbermann"... it gets really old after a while.
I didn't bring fox into the conversation. You did. That's your obsession. I'm just pointing out the fact that your only defense of MSNBC is to attack another network. You are just a fanboi for far left hacks like MSNBC. Its not your fault, you are just too dumb to know better. All you know about Fox probably comes from bathtub boy olberman and you have his poster on your bedroom ceiling.
i never said you brought them into the conversation... i brought them in because they are part of the media, just like msnbc and cnn are as well. my defense of msnbc is not to attack fox news... i attack fox news because i am pointing out their attempt at deceiving their viewers and claiming they are fair and balanced when they arent. msnbc and cnn dont make those claims. oh im a "fanboi" am i? tell me more einstein. clearly you dont know any better than to bash me without knowing me.
i know more about fox news and its media distortion than you ever will because i actually do my research. and i dont need to hear it from olbermann. sure, i watch olbermann all the time, i enjoy him as entertainment, just like people enjoy oreilly for entertainment. the difference is oreilly is quite possibly clinically insane and has trouble telling the truth. he just tries to instill his agenda into his viewers instead of being honest. and i dont praise olbermann, so get it right, asshole.
Oh haha!! An Olbermann viewer claiming to do research. Bathtub boy doesn't even believe his own BS but you lap it up. Yes you are so hard to know. I'm sure you are very deep. Or so you tell others who tend to strongly suspect otherwise. O'reilly might be insane but he makes Olbermann look like a neglected severely beaten down syndrome baby thrown into a trash heap on prom night so his mother could free up time to snort her next line. The other nuts at MSNBC won't even sit with him at lunch.
yea... as an olbermann viewer (and olbermann himself), i do much more research than any fox news viewer (and fox news commentator) will ever do. olbermann is taken more seriously than any bullshit oreilly hannity and limbaugh spew. lol are you serious? do you actually hold oreilly to that high of regard? whats wrong with you? what has oreilly done that is so useful for people in this country? nobody finds him credible and people only watch him because he is a nutcase and delivers great comedy.
I only hold O'reilly in much higher regard than Bathtub Boy Olbermann. That still doesn't say much for O'Reilly. Just how little I think of Bathtub Boy. You are seriously undermining your claim of doing any research by even admitting to being a Bathtub Boy viewer. Olberdork wont even have a conservative on his show because Keithy will be made to look like the whimpering idiot he is. He only has ass kissers on his show to keep his little fanbois in the dark and idolizing him.
"Olberdork wont even have a conservative on his show because Keithy will be made to look like the whimpering idiot he is."
wow good theory, sweetheart. where did you come up with that load of crap? do you have any proof? didnt think so. by the way, olbermann has had plenty of conservatives on his show. nice try, though.
"He only has ass kissers on his show to keep his little fanbois in the dark and idolizing him."
right, whatever you say... illiterate dumbfuck. learn to spell correctly.
"Fox wasn't the subject of the video and yet you keep bringing it in as some lame relativism argument for MSNBC's behavior."
thanks for pointing that out for the 10th time... i appreciate it, really. but once again, what im doing is pointing out fnc's bias with the medias bias as a whole. i never said msnbc is fair, and neither is fnc. get it now?
"As if your opinion that fox behaves badly is an excuse for MSNBC to behave badly."
um no, where did i say that? who are you trying to fool here?
wow.. thanks for clarifying that little mix up for me... i was dying to know which immature nickname you were going to give me. its interesting to see that you like to give me the misspelled one... or maybe you just dont know how to spell. way to go, chief.
idiot much? "a the guy"? having trouble spelling again? wow... seems to be a daily occurrence for you. buddy, you cant even cite your sources or back up your claims... you just say so and so said this, and cant even say where it came from. i really hope you dont plan on debating or being a journalist professionally because youd get tossed out on your ass before they even interview you. good luck with that.
I just can't get the data past your complete lack of reading comprehension skills. Jump on the typo. It's the only argument you can make effectively. You don't know your head from your ass but at least you seem proud of that fact.
lol what data? you dont have a shred of data to show let alone the bullshit you pull out of your ass. why dont you actually get a half decent argument against nbc and msnbc instead of picking on blown up trucks from 15 years ago. if you are really that desperate to bash nbc with stories like that, then you are clearly delusional. i mean seriously, at the pace your going, youll be lucky to even have a brain cell left with all the garbage you come up with. how pathetic.
Right, you simply hijacked the thread for a dissertation on media bias in general. Thank you Professor Dumbass. Thats no excuse for MSNBC being the "WORST NETWORK IN THE WORLD". Try again.
hijacked the thread? lmao... what a joke. so now im a video hijacker because i want to state my opinion and debate with somebone who uses braindead arguments to support fox news? thanks professor asshat. what other bullshit you got shoved up your ass?
So you defend MSNBC by attacking Fox news and then cry when someone debunks your arguments? I'm not defending Fox or anyone. I can see how correcting your absurd errors might look that way to you. Please, continue with your hissy fit.
you have not debunked a single thing, idiot... you have just countered it with your own opinion which means nothing because you cant produce actual facts. show me just one thing that you have debunked that i have said. i bet you wont find anything. i have barely made any claims where i have to back it up... i have mostly defended msnbc here, and when attacking fox i use proof that is well documented from watching the channel, whereas you dont. and if needed, ill show plenty of video proof.
You just admitted to not knowing NBC rigged gas tanks and you didn't know McClellan backed down from his own story. His original book was going to attack the press but then they gave him more money to write a different book. So you've been proven to be wrong by your own admission and have failed to prove you watch anything but far left nonsense. Grow up kid.
show me proof that he backed down from his story moron... if you think im just going to believe w/e BS you say, good luck, bc you havent been able to prove anything you have said with a simple link or article, and then you tell me to go do research for you. again, thats not how it works in the real world... maybe in your stupid life. lmao you think im going to believe your bullshit about mccllelan? obviously you have an agenda to smear him bc he exposed fox news, so please try again. pathetic.
Wow, you can't be this stupid. Everybody knows this story. Maybe you need to get your news from someplace other than MessNBC. Google "McClellan backs down" and read all about your hero and stop acting like such a brain dead idiot and showing everyone what little you know. You set a perfect example of the typical MSNBC viewer. A shrill uninformed idiot who can't do even the most basic research.
hey idiot, the only thing mccllelan said he messd up on was in the interview with matthews when the questions were phrased badly. he never backed down on the entire allegations of fox news receiving white house talking points. he confirmed that and it is well documented. stop trying to link one comment from mccllelan as him breaking down and admiting he lied. he strictly meant the matthews interview and he specified that to oreilly as well. tyical idiots like you... taking quotes out of context.
by the way, if anyone is misinformed here, its you because you cant even cite your sources or back up your lies. and then whatever claims you make, they end up being untrue and i debunk them and you continue to look like a stupid jackass who doesnt even believe his own bullshit. as an msnbc viewer, im very informed, and i still do my my research when i hear things in the media... i dont just believe whatever they say. you dont know shit so shut the fuck up.
For all your bitching about sources, you have failed to provide any. For all your bitching about links, you have failed to provide any. You don't know the most basic facts about stories that everybody already knows about and everybody is laughing at you. Keith Olbermann is probably laughing at your level of stupidity and youre his biggest fan. You can keep claiming you are informed but you have completely failed to prove it at even the most basic level.
You are a real idiot. McClellen said, "The truth is I messed up. I was specifically not trying to single anyone out, including you. But the way a couple of the questions were phrased in that interview along with my response left things open to interpretation and I should not have let that happen." So he is blaming all the accusations on "interpretations" and trying to weasel away from his allegations. If you are trying to defend him now, you'd be the first to do so.
we already went over this... he apologized for getting bad questioning from chris matthews and not answering them clearly. he never backed down on his complete allegations of fox news and receiving talking points. if they werent true, he wouldnt have written a book talking about it and other issues regarding bush. take your head out of your ass and stop trying to convince yourself of something that you have no idea how to defend. its getting annoying to have to repeat myself to a dumbass.
Other than the token conservative Pat Buchanan and he only allows him on when they agree. Only people who kiss his ass are allowed on the show and only far left libtards that wish they could kiss his ass watch his show unless looking for comedy. You dream of french kissing his ass.
"Other than the token conservative Pat Buchanan and he only allows him on when they agree."
hah i love when you make these outrageous claims without backing it up other than your opinion that means nothing and holds absolutely no water. if you actually think your so called "opinion" actually means anything, then you need to get a new outlook on life bc you cant back it up with even a lick of evidence. um... wow, french kissing his ass? thanks for that image... good luck doing that to oreilly.
Other than you claiming I'm not backing up my argument (which I did if you could read) where are you ever backing up your "arguement"? You demand a much higher level of proof from others than you can offer for your side. You can't even Google. I named the only 'conservative' Olberdork talks to and you got nothing for your argument but another hissy fit.
how did you back it up? all you said was olbermann brings on buchanan when they agree. how would you know that? did you actually see what they said to each other? do you have actual evidence to prove that they were agreeing? did you ever think that maybe they agreeing without yelling and screaming like the maniacs on fox news do? see once again, you cant seem to understand that backing up your claims means more than just saying it, but actually showing it and you have yet to do that. good luck.
As a matter of fact I did watch. I watch MSNBC when I need a good laugh. It is funnier than the dailyshow because they don't even try. You are mad because you can't prove me wrong and you know it. Thus you are pretending it is my job to supply you with overwhelming proof that can get through to your tiny brain. I doubt one could prove to you that the earth is round.
oh you did watch? what did they say? what did buchanan and olbermann agree on? please do tell since your the research expert here. lmao funnier than the daily show... thats funny, as it happens, the daily show and comedy central in general is taken more seriously than fox news. there are people out there that probably go there for actual newsworthy stories instead of fox that just spews republican propaganda, and like an idiot, you continue to contribute to the cause of conservative bias.
Like I keep transcripts on file just to debate some tool on the internet. I'm sure you really do take the Daily Show as serious news. Anyone who defends MessNBC would think the Daily Show is a good news source. Their viewers are just that stupid.
then stop admitting it! stop saying they agreed when you dont even know what they said. just say you saw it but your not sure what was said exactly. it doesnt kill you to admit youre wrong. you just like to assume that every guest olbermann brings on agrees with him because that is what you hear from other people and since you barely watch msnbc and countdown in general, you see one interview and just take that as being the evidence of what you hear through the grapevine. nice job.
You are pathetic. All I'm saying I can't provide you with the damn transcript. You are demanding a level of proof that you yourself can't provide for your own argument and then pretending that means you are right. How stupid can you possibly be? Why should I take your word when I've seen it myself? Olbermann is a joke and all but his small audience knows it.
no "bub", your the pathetic one because you make a claim about something that you know you cant back up, and then you say "no really, it happened". just stop while your ahead... because nothing you try to claim holds water. you continue to drop the ball. good luck with that. and i never said he disagrees with his guests every time, but it has happened. just because he doesnt debate like oreilly and hannity doesnt mean he doesnt disagree. thats just his style, and his 2m viewers a night enjoy it.
I can prove it because you obviously can't prove me wrong despite really wanting to. How simple would it be to go find video of Olbermann really disagreeing with one of his guests if it is so common? How pathetic is it that you can't even find one? Yet you expect me to provide you with every transcript ever made of him agreeing with his guests just to prove he always does. You are just bad stupid.
oh im mad huh? is that why i keep laughing at your ridiculous allegations and bold face lies? ive already proven you wrong, and you desperately keep trying to counter my beatings on you with false claims. um, chief... it is your job to show proof. so in your world you can make w\e claims you want, and we have to check if youre right? im not your fact checker. stop your bitching and actually put some effort into backing up your claims. and you say you do your homework... clearly you dont.
I can't seem to post an outside link. Its not accepting them. Maybe my fault for having a life outside Youtube. But you claim you are so great at research yet couldn't be bothered to put "NBC Exploding Gas tank" into google or "McClellen backed down". Two stories everyone knows about already. So instead you toss insults and look like a moron for not even knowing these stories. Yes, you are a typical MSNBC viewer. You have proven my point.
have you never seen a link posted on youtube before? its not that hard... if you werent mentally retarded, you could find a way around it. yea clearly you dont have a life since you manage to respond to my replies so quickly. on the other hand i have a life and a job to deal with, and i cant respond so quick. i already debunked both of those stories and you still keep convincing yourself that they are legitimate. you dont have shit... and you are a typical ignorant nut job with no arguments.
You call eleven hours quick? I have a job and a life and it just doesn't take very long to respond to your nonsense. I guess you are just slow. Post a link. Show us how its done. I don't see one posted in this entire section. Looks like you tried but failed to post one.
compared to how long i take to reply, yeah you do it pretty quick. you must not have jack shit to do. i have a job too, and a girlfriend, and friends, and other priorities. thats something you cant say for yourself because youd be lucky to have any of those. well i have posted links before, as i mentioned, but i guess youtube is cracking down on it. i already explained how it has been done and what i did to try and post them, but oh well.
no you didnt back up your argument... do you call what you have said in all your posts as proof and facts? wow... you havent been able to prove anything you have said with solid facts, frankly bc you dont have any and have no knowledge about any of the idiotic claims you make. all you have to say are immature words like "fanboi" and making up stupid nicknames for olbermann. btw, when did i ever spell argument "arguement"? or can you not spell right consistently?
I think you should stick to finding spelling mistakes rather than try to defend MSNBC. You just are not very good at defending MessNBC. Are these so-called "idiotic claims" the same ones you just fail to Google? Are you going to use your age as an excuse again when you find out I'm right?
i think you should stick to trying to type a coherent sentence without having a huge brain fart that causes your retardation to take over. oh no, not only am i good at defending msnbc, based on my ability to actually research, but im great at proving fox to be the propaganda machine that it is. it will be interesting to watch how much their bias will unravel with obama in office and al franken in the senate... those 2 things alone will drive oreilly absolutely nuts. should be a blast!
My sentences contain substance while yours are the incoherent ranting of a twenty year old far left moonbat. I'm sure MessNBC is thrilled to have your support. You are the perfect example of their pathetic audience. I think Obama is more of a problem for MessNBC. How long can they keep tonguing his ass before even their most left wing fanbois require accuracy and perspective? And Franken? You actually like this tool? Hes already an embarrassment.
lol i highly doubt substance is the right word for your frivolous statements and false claims... esp since you lack the ability to prove them or back them up. you are a typical moron that sympathizes with fox news and their own misstatements while trying to act like you know it all. you wouldnt know wtf youre talking about if that BS shot out of your ass. actually msnbc has already went after obama... olbermann already called him out on the choice of panetta in the cia and rev warren. idiot.
the only thing you have perspective on is how much propaganda you preach that fox news and blowhards like hannity limbaugh and oreilly shove down your throat. that is all you know and it shows in every one of your posts. still bitter about franken winning huh? yeah... you must be a huge oreilly fan. and you wont admit it either... its ok, its obvious you love what he tells you to believe. i really hope you enjoy the democrats in control as much as oreilly and fox news will.
Limbaugh doesn't work for Fox and those offering their opinion on Fox admit they are commentators unlike the hacks on MSNBC who claim they can wear both hats. You really do like franken don't you? I don't know if "winning" is the word. They have more votes than voters. He will probably get the spot but it doesn't say much for liberals. I'm glad democrats are in control. After all the far left's hypocrisy and bitching we can now all see if they are willing to put up or shut up.
oh please, limbaugh is practically an extension of fox news' talking points. he may not work for them, but he shares a lot of the views and ideologies that beck, hannity and oreilly do. dont even go there. no i dont really like franken, i just like the fact that his seat in the senate pisses off oreilly. its a great sight to see. whatever... make all your excuses. and dont worry... democrats will do more good for this country in the next 2 years than the republicans did in the last 8. well see.
Anyone who doesn't think like you or share your ideology is a bad person. Any network that lets these people speak is a bad network. That's what your real problem is. You don't care if MSNBC is honest just that they say what you want to hear. How very "open minded" of you. Everyone should want fair and honest elections regardless of who wins and Franken doesn't make your side look good. I hope the democrats can do good but the media's roll is to keep them honest and I don't see MSNBC doing that.
Oh they attacked Obama from the left. Yes wow, that took balls for them. Pat them on the back. Did you buy the NBC News Historical DVD "Yes We Can! The Barack Obama Story!" Yet? It's a real DVD by our favorite 'unbiased' news organization. No, debunking your accusations about Fox doesn't mean I sympathize with them. I'm objective and like the truth. Not an MSNBC fanboi like yourself.
yes something fox news barely or basically never has done to the right. what a shocker. why would i buy that dvd? i dont need it. thanks. either way, im sure its better to watch it than the ass kissing and brown nosing that fox news did for all the republicans, especially painting bush as some sort of a patriot and proclaiming guiliani as "america's mayor". haha... the only way fox news responds to their bias accusations is by saying that they were the first ones to report on bush's dui story.
You don't need to buy the DVD because you already watch MSNBC. You got to watch the Obama Network live. Fox news at least doesn't pretend Hannity isn't a commentator. All your complaints about Fox revolve around their commentators. At least they are upfront about who their commentators are. I dont think anyone at Fox is trying to pass Hannity off as unbiased as MSNBC did with Olbermann and Matthews.
and please explain to me how pat buchanan is a token conservative... hes got opinions that the lunatic sean hannity would agree with, so why dont you figure out what a real conservative is instead of just assuming that the ones from fox news are real conservatives. its the ones like buchanan, joe scarborough, tucker carlson that really stand up for the conservative movement, not the neo cons and nutcases that fox news panders to. fox news couldnt even give ron paul a fair shake in the primaries.
He is a token in that the libs bring him out only when he supports their opinion just from a slightly different angle. He makes good points but he is used so they can claim "balance" even when not presenting the other side. Tucker and Joe are RINOs. Yet Joe gives MSNBC some hope. Hannity and BOR are commentators. Unlike MSNBC that plays Olbermann and Chrisy as journalists. Ron Pauls problem is Ron Paul. He couldn't get enough voters behind him and you can only devote time to a loser for so long.
oh is that right? is that why matthews brings him on hardball so he can have a yelling debate with another liberal? is that why him and scarborough tag team mika or some liberal on morning joe yelling at them about how useful of a tactic torture is in gitmo? yea that happens because ive seen it since i watch morning joe every morning. how are tucker and joe rinos? they have constantly defended bush and claimed he has kept us safe since 9/11. they are true republicans... hannity and billo arent.
furthermore, oreilly claims he is a registered independent, yet he continuously defends republicans and claims he is a "traditionalist"... his typical way of making up words so that he wont admit what he really is... a conservative. however, matthews, who voted for bush in 2000, and olbermann dont keep bringing on people to yell them down and act all tough and passionate like they are some lunatic blowhards like fox news promotes. that is the difference and you have a lot of trouble getting it.
Again you are attacking fox for what their commentators do and not what their anchors do. MSNBC doesn't know the difference either. The level of hypocrisy you show is astounding. But you are just a kid and do not know any better. Olbermann just yells for the hell of it. Why would he yell at guests when he only has them on when they agree with him? No he just declares everyone who he doesn't agree with "THE WORST PERSON IN THE WORLD". Bathtub boy doesn't even believe his own crap.
the commentators are the anchors you sniveling moron. oreilly thinks hes a journalist and continues to act like his opinion is actually taken seriously. just like you, he tries to back up his proof with quotes taken out of context and just goes on a complete attack tirade from the very beginning of his show until the end. it always starts with his talking pts memo rants and then he adds more comedy with his pinheads and patriots. does he actually think that people watch him with a straight face?
No you pathetic moron, only on MSNBC do they completely ignore those lines. News anchors read the straight news off the teleprompter. Commentators give their opinions on whatever topics they want to discuss. You don't know the difference because you watch MSNBC. That's why you can't understand how other networks operate.
lmao... so because i watch msnbc i dont know the difference between news and opinion? oh yeah... im sure you get a chalk full of fair reporting and opinion separately on fnc? god you are a moron. every single fox news show has an anchor that displays their bias opinion. there are no straight reporters at fox news other than the ones that do the quick news updates between commercials. and those people are barely ever on or have their own show. ill give the benefit of the doubt on that one. lol
David Shuster is a confirmed Penis wanker
032490mf 2 months ago
@dr71956=MORON YOURSELF BITCH WHO VOTED FOR HILLARY
merceratus36 5 months ago
david shuster's forehead must be sore after having zeigler's cock slapped across it so many times during this interview...
WickederThanThou 7 months ago
HAHAHAHAHAHA I love these arguments, SO funny! =D
ProForgeRacing 7 months ago
good lord, is this what MSNBC does every day? Without a doubt the people who work at MSNBC are dumber than Sarah Palin
tubelarr 7 months ago
@tubelarr=YOUR MOM IS DUMBER THAN PALIN FOR NOT ABORTING FAGGOTS LIKE YOU
merceratus36 5 months ago
@merceratus36 Wow, you sure got me there! Your mom must be proud :)
tubelarr 5 months ago
Shuster is a liberal party HACK...he hates GOP women.. WHERE HAS THIS TARD BEEN LATELY?
roostertrigger 1 year ago
@roostertrigger=Fuck you bitch
merceratus36 4 months ago
Nice. I like David. Here's the funny thing about the Barracuda. Nothing is ever her fucking fault. Doug Hoffman got smoked and it wasn't her fault. McZombie got smoked last November and it wasn't her fault. She quit being the governor of Alaska for reasons unknown until her booked dropped. What, she could run a state that has less people living in it than an L.A. and write a book at the same time?
Conservatives deserve this twist
AbuAmirah 2 years ago
ziegler is a joke.
MrNawlidg 2 years ago 3
Way to go Ziegler. Talk over the other person and change the subject. It works with the small minded. What a douchebag!
I think he's the reason sarah and todd are at odds with each other! Hmmmmm????
whiteliberal1 2 years ago
Mslsd fair and balanced horse shit. Not like they have a "Pimped Out" agenda or their crappy "news stars" don't get booted off presidential debate coverage. Keith Overbite's 8 minute rant over Bobby Kennedy and Hillary Clinton made me quit watching MSLSD and eventually made me Independant from voting Democrat for the first time in 20 years..now I look at the network as some progressive statist shit hole. VIVA La GE!
tubaboy71 2 years ago
@tubaboy71=Fuck you bitch
merceratus36 4 months ago
@merceratus36 Boy aren't you quite the intellectual? Are you pro Obysmal?
tubaboy71 4 months ago
@tubaboy71 Go suck Janet Reno's cock since you're mom had sex with Hillary Clinton
merceratus36 4 months ago
@merceratus36 well aren't you such a happy fellow
tubaboy71 4 months ago
@tubaboy71=Fuck you and Hillary
merceratus36 4 months ago
John Ziegler tore this Shuster guy up
Shuster comes across as irrational, totally biased and hugely misinformed even when he actually has the clip in front of him.
No wonder MSNBC's ratings are so low.
lees20022 2 years ago
@lees20022=JARED LEE LOUGHNER'S BITCH!
mr300ism 11 months ago
@lees20022=Fag
merceratus36 4 months ago
MSNBC is clearly scared of Sarah Palin otherwise they woud not trash on her. She poses a threat to the libs and their agenda. If she was such a bad candidate they would let her run and easily get beaten , but they know the truth and they are scared so they make up shit and take things out of contents
larry267 2 years ago
larry, how true ! the democrats continue to hammer away at Palin because they are afraid of her. David Letterman has NOW the National Org of Women against him for his insults about her 14 yr old daughter
k3304 2 years ago
I prefer conservatives or anyone who is honest and says they are giving their opinion. But, David Shuster presents himself as a jounalist and is so biased and opinionated in his reporting. I agree with John Zeigler that Palin was treated extreemly unfairly this past election. The moment she was announced as John McCains Vice Presidential candidate she was demonized by most of the media. Meredith Viera of NBC comes to mind when she did a whole segment on Palins daughers pregnancy.
ShayaMusic 2 years ago
Ziegler is a bit touchy, isn't he? He needs a good teabagging!
666marquis 2 years ago
LOL! Schuster was exposed for the fraud that he is! LOL!
divine137 2 years ago 2
Ironically enough, Sarah Palin has more official experience than Obama does, a full 5 years worth, and much more notable.
Shiftfallout 2 years ago
hahahaha shuster got own. he proved the guys point for him. ziegler was able to use his own words against him in the ACTUAL INTERVIEW. Hilarious.
sheridan891 2 years ago
omg that idiot Shuster would ask the guy questions then he wouldn;'t even let him answer. He lost all credibility with me from the getgo. That was seriously rude.. No wonder MSNBC's rating are in the toilet.. Why shout over your guests? Typical angry liberal.
jackinthemoon 2 years ago
They always do this jack. MSNBC has the fewest alternative voices (conservatives) of any network, there is practically none. The very rare occasian were they put one on, they either A. Pwn the hell out of the lib on there (whoever it is for the hour), and there never invite them back or like you said B. Talk over them and let them get in as little as possible, and end the conversation quickly. Its no suprise there ratings suck yes, but it really is a suprise they have any viewers at all.
Madrox145 2 years ago
I don't see it that way, I see it more that Shuster was trying to keep Ziegler on point. However, here's my question; do you like O'Reilly? If you do than you are bias because Mr O' Reilly does the same thing. Don't forget that Fox started all of that kind of stuff? and remeber there are always three sides to the truth!!
bdd1278 2 years ago
When did O'Reilly say he grew up in a "tough" or "rough" neighborhood? He said he grew up in Levitttown, LI, which was a lower middle class town of post-war cookie cutter houses. He called it modest, but never "tough" or "rough" as you claim.
EagleinNYC 3 years ago
he has said several times in the past that he would keep dealing with bullies and getting in fights in his old neighborhood and he would be walking to school and people would try and beat him up. if i had a video proof of it, i could prove it, but i cant supply that. but i have seen it on his show and heard it on the radio as well.
GstateBALLER925 3 years ago
Shuster said at the end that John Ziegler was "welcome back anytime." But said nothing about whether he would be permitted to say anything without being shouted down once again by Shuster. I know that Shuster (after being released by the successful cable news network) now works for the Tingle Up the Leg network, but he reveals his obvious fear of being revealed ignorant every time he shouts Ziegler down. But by shouting down your guest, you reveal that you were raised by wolves.
EagleinNYC 3 years ago
"But said nothing about whether he would be permitted to say anything without being shouted down once again by Shuster."
the same thing should be cleared up by bill oreilly when he brings guests on his show. he only invites guests to come back on the show when he likes them... not ones that give him a good debate.
"I know that Shuster (after being released by the successful cable news network) now works for the Tingle Up the Leg network"
sorry, fox news is not a successful cable news network.
GstateBALLER925 3 years ago
"But by shouting down your guest, you reveal that you were raised by wolves."
once again, the same thing should be said about bill oreilly. however, im sure oreilly was raised by hyenas in his tough little town that he grew up in. wow... i would hate to live in that rough neighborhood. what a joke.
GstateBALLER925 3 years ago
By what criteria is Fox News not successful?
It outdraws CNN and MSNBC, often combined.
It is more profitable than CNN and MSNBC.
So, again, in what manner is Fox News NOT "successful"?
EagleinNYC 3 years ago
success is not signified just by ratings and profit... you also have to considered legitimate and taken seriously, which fox news is neither. they are simply a conservative propaganda machine repeating the same talking points that republicans do. everything that benefited bush for the past 8 years, they took marching orders to get his back and help him stay in office. sure, they were successful in that regard, but they arent successful as far as performance and good journalism.
GstateBALLER925 3 years ago
Fox News is a success in every meaningful sense, your arrogation of a proprietary definition of "success" notwithstanding.
Or did you actually think that the liberal media would bestow awards like Pulitzer upon a fair and balanced outlet, such as Fox News? After all, Fox News SEEMS conservative only in contrast to all the universally liberal, legacy outlets.
If you want good, honest journalism, watch "Special Report" at 6pm. But that's only if you're open to fair and balanced reporting.
EagleinNYC 3 years ago
lmao, "Fox News is a success in every meaningful sense"... wow how far do you have your nose up rupert murdochs ass crack there buddy? you might want to pull it out and smell a little dose of reality. the only thing fox news has success in is spreading republican propaganda and spewing bush talking points. that is all they have and all they will ever have to lean on. oh here we go with stupid paranoia... the complaining of the evil "liberal media"... for god sakes get over it. its gotten so old.
GstateBALLER925 3 years ago
what do you call limbaugh, beck, oreilly, malkin, coulter, gibson, hannity, levin, and hewitt in the "liberal media"? are they not part of it with their millions of listeners/viewers? you idiots brag about those ratings but you ignore how much more influence they have than the rest of the "liberals" on nbc, cnn, abc, cbs, etc. its ridiculous and completely contradicts your idiotic statements. stop ignoring the conservative media and how much the far right spreads its opinion. you are a moron.
GstateBALLER925 3 years ago
GstateBALLER925>>"just as much as oreilly hannity and wallace have bias as well."
You named one independent, one Republican, and one Democrat.
EagleinNYC 3 years ago
lmao oreily is not an independent, he only claims to be. hannity is a far right lunatic conservative, and chris wallace is biased towards the republicans as much as any other anchor on that channel. what makes him a democrat exactly? according to wallace himself, he WAS a democrat for over 20 years and admits to voting for candidates from both parties. so using that logic, then chris matthews should be considered a republican since he (admittedly) voted for bush in 2000.
GstateBALLER925 3 years ago
O'Reilly is a registered independent.
Hannity is a registered Republican.
Wallace is a registered Democrat.
Was that not clear from my original post?
EagleinNYC 3 years ago
just because someone is registered as a democrat or republican, it doesnt mean that is what they are. wallace himself said that being a democrat is the only possible way of being involved in the political process in the big democratic environment of washington, d.c.
once again, using your ridiculous logic that means matthews is a republican because he voted for bush, olbermann is nothing because he doesnt vote, and maddow is a liberal.
GstateBALLER925 3 years ago
by the way, if you want the link to chris wallace saying that, here it is:
washingtonpost * com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/10/AR2006101001509 * html
GstateBALLER925 3 years ago
RayBoylan--GET READY FOLKS...RAY BOYLAN will again enlight us all with his IMMATURE & TOTALLY IRRELEVANT COMMENTS.
As it is customary to this FOXNEWS BRAINWASHED RACIST & HOMOPHOBE LOSER, he'll spew his RATPUBLICAN PROPAGANDA ... as if we are in the least interested.
BARACK OBAMA WON!! ... WE THE PEOPLE WON!!
librophile 3 years ago
MSNBC is a left-wing network. Some people have been living under a rock for so long not to realize that.
Are you going to sit here and tell me that the Liberal Trio: Chris Matthews, Keith Olbermann and Rachel Maddow simply do not have a liberal bias? Don't bullshit me...I'm waiting for the day when Olbermann has an opposing viewpoint on his show.
LaLaGrunge 3 years ago
nobody is denying that olbermann, maddow, and matthew have bias, just as much as oreilly hannity and wallace have bias as well. olbermann has plenty of opposing viewpoints on his show... just because hes not yelling back and forth with his guests like they do on fox noise doesnt mean that there is no disagreement. get it right, idiot.
GstateBALLER925 3 years ago
You lost the election in 2000.
Then you lost again in 2004.
The world loves George W Bush. Face it.
BatousaiofChaos 3 years ago
Palin...once you got caught lying by all medias, about your bridge to nowhere ... why did you keep on lying?
Palin...once you were found guilty of abuse of power ... why did you pretend instead to have been exonerated of all charges?
Ziegler...you conservative republican has-been, when will you make a film about how Bush stole the 2000 elections?
What else can we expect for the right wing corrupt idiots ... but lies & more lies!!
librophile 3 years ago
I don't care what side of the spectrum you fall on. If you are a rational thinking person then you know Palin was wholly unqualified to be VP. I hope she crawls back to the Alaskan obscurity from which she was plucked.
celestialnubian 3 years ago
...and I wish that Palin gets kicked out of office in the next Alaska governor election.
librophile 3 years ago
GET READY KIDS I AM SURE OUR FAVORITE SAVANT LIBROPHILE IS ABOUT TO GENERATE AND EXCRETE ONE OF HIS FAMOUS ANAGRAMS LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL
Somebody get this moron to the electro-shock room.
RayBoylan 3 years ago
what the fuck are you talking about? and why do you keep loling? i didnt see anything funny there.
GstateBALLER925 3 years ago
sorry I guess you feel left out now.
sorry you poor unfortunate fuck
RayBoylan 3 years ago
no... im good, thanks. the only one that is feeling unfortunate here is you because you look like a fucking jackass. did you want to go cry now?
GstateBALLER925 3 years ago
No you are not "good" You posted to this thread over 20 times in 2 days. With disjointed comments like even moderate dems think MESSNBC went over the line, "Thomas"? Zeigler is a sycophant propping up Palin and my favorite -
GstateBALLER925 (3 days ago) tom zeigler is a far right conservative cock sucker who absolutely LOVES to lick palins juicy cunt... what a pathetic puppy dog he is
Do I want to go cry? No GState cying is for 22year old virgins who live in mom's basement. Get a life.
RayBoylan 3 years ago
no really, im good, thanks. wow... 20 times huh? you actually took time out of your lonely day to count all of my comments? um... that might as well be stalking. what are you going to do next? find out my measurements and interests and try to flirt with me? yeah... id hold off on the creepy research that youve got planned, buddy. youre already looking like a fag. yes you do... go cry, flamer. enjoy the tears. lmao me a virgin? i get more pussy than you have a chance at getting dick. good luck.
GstateBALLER925 3 years ago
RayBoylan--GET READY FOLKS...RAY BOYLAN will again enlight us all with his IMMATURE & TOTALLY IRRELEVANT COMMENTS.
As it is customary to this FOXNEWS BRAINWASHED RACIST & HOMOPHOBE LOSER, he'll spew his RATPUBLICAN PROPAGANDA ... as if we are in the least interested.
BARACK OBAMA WON!! ... WE THE PEOPLE WON!!
librophile 3 years ago
What is funny is that when Hillary Clinton complained about sexusim during her campiagn with Obama Palin said that Hilary was whininng when she talk about it to the media. Hillary should become stronger and prove herself instead of playing victum. Now Palin goes through the same thing and she doesn't realize that she sounds like whinning and playing victum. Well what comes around goes around.
hmmyeah 3 years ago 2
The difference is that Palin waited until after the election was over to make her complaints heard. She isn't "playing the victim" to get votes. She didn't cry on cue like Hillary. She has legit complaints about how the media treated her and her family. All but the most blind see MSNBC's problems. But of course the media in general doesn't do well at turning an eye on itself to expose its problems and lack of ethics. They certainly aren't going to let some little female governor question them.
EmeraldAlmond 3 years ago
And WHY does Fox have more viewers? Because all of the other networks are bias left wing and do not report any "real news". If they weren't so bias and reported bullshit all of the time then maybe there would be more equality across the board. Get a clue. Yes, Obama did attend a Madrassa and I didn't get that from FOX; I saw the document myself, his religion was signed in as "ISLAM".
filmjoyce 3 years ago
David is such an insulated prep school sissy.
goodinohio 3 years ago
David Shuster invites this film maker on to talk over him because he and MSNBC don't want to hear the truth. Watch the interview in its entirety people and judge for yourself. The left-wing talking heads are twisting America.
southpore1 3 years ago
Shuster takes Palin's comment out of context even in this interview. She was not complaining about the documentary in her press release but reporters like Shuster who were twisting the tone and content of the documentary.
MSNBC is on the defensive now and have even enlisted their staff to comment on every Sara Palin article and video to sway the publics view on their horrible onesided and malicious reporting during the election.
Don't they know that it was obvious to everyone?
lees20022 3 years ago
Palin was a fucking retard and still is, but who the fuck cares? Go back to stuffing moose--but this time stuff your ugly fucking-wanna-be-celebrity-over-inflated talking head up it's ass and chow down bitch! You are a loser just like Crusty McAnus!!!
BoonBoom2055 3 years ago
Speaking of that ho Obama's mama, who's house was she posing nude in with a xmas tree (not Obama Sr.'s house since he is Muslim) -Nat King Cole & Stan Kenton Records in view for a photographer who developed his own photos?
Answer Key: Wanna Wiki the Jazz & photography enthusiast John Marshall Davis?
Case closed. Move On! (haha! I made a funny!)
Zapppo 3 years ago
RightWingPalin? MSM must be where you got all of your information. I don't think the Libertarian party would have endorsed her for Govenor of AK but you know more then her. Oh, she's a Christian...ah, that must be it. She's pro-life, oh, btw there are Dems that didn't vote for Obama because of his kill babies stance even if they survive abortions; so their far right too?
filmjoyce 3 years ago
everyone from msnbc and fox news is a shape shifting reptilian
namebling 3 years ago
Look at this asshole who made this movie.
I mean, are these people even real? Look at him, he doesn't look real, he looks like some sort of pre-packaged robot. Where the fuck do people like him even come from? I grew up around normal people and I never knew anyone like this-he's weird. I don't accept him as a normal human being.
zndprophet 3 years ago
Right and Schuster is....?
RayBoylan 3 years ago
Can you picture Old Man McCain and Hockey Mom Sarah Palin trying to deal with this economic crisis, and this Israel situation?
Thank God the media asked those questions. If she WAS allowed to be just a smiling cardboard cut-out, I'm sure they would have gotten a lot more votes.
It's dangerous of politicians to think it's okay to complain about the media questioning them. Very dangerous precedent. Obama went on Bill O'reilly and dealt with bullshit-but did he bitch about it? No. He beat Billo.
zndprophet 3 years ago 2
He went on OReilly but his party would not allow a debate to be aired on Fox. OReilly wasn't giving any bullshit to him. In fact Obama showed a personal side that was lacking everywhere else. Remember he is the one who said he wouldn't vote for himself based on Fox News' coverage of him and he was as obsessed with Hannity as Keith Overbite (Countdown to Zero Ratings) is with OReily.
The media on all sides is in the tank for or against someone. The best days of journalism sadly are over
RayBoylan 3 years ago
That PMSNBC Guy is a fucking moron
NiggaTubeDotCom 3 years ago
Ask an Obama drone if they could name 3 in depth stories that were positive about Palin. Then wait for a response. Remember Palin has an approval rating in Alaska of 80% percent. Also ask an Obama drone to name three in depth stories by the media that were negative about Obama, then again watch their expression and wait for a response. In both cases they won't be able to answer both questions. If anything they will attack you for daring to ask them in the first place.
xpandergt 3 years ago
I love how the douchebag decided to title this: "Shuster V, Right Wing Palin Film Maker". How about "John Ziegler interviewed by Pro-Obama Left Wing Talking Head"
JMac46142 3 years ago
don't present facts to him jMac, you'll just confuse him more so then he already is.
xpandergt 3 years ago
Because Ziegler looks more like a fucking robot made by Wal Mart employees in China than a human being.
zndprophet 3 years ago 2
This lady has some serious mental health issues ... paranoia and delusions. She needs help.
bobbynorwich2 3 years ago
you're the one who needs help you little MSNBC addicted lifeless asshole
mopar2fast 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
A commedian once qwipted: 'There are two kinds of people, those who like Neil Diamond, and those who can't stand him.' - apparently it's the same with Sarah Palin. Being a fan of Palin, I take great deligh in the aggitation she causes people like Shuster - he was really excited in his antagonism. And note also that he never refuted the accusation that MSNBC was biased! How could anyone refute it? That game is over.
tpgeraghty 3 years ago
A commedian once qwipted: 'There are two kinds of people, those who like Neil Diamond, and those who can't stand him.' - apparently it's the same with Sarah Palin. Being a fan of Palin, I take great deligh in the aggitation she causes people like Shuster - he was really excited in his antagonism. And note also that he never refuted the accusation that MSNBC was biased! How could anyone refute it? That game is over.
tpgeraghty 3 years ago
Fox News is so incredibly conservative it's sad. It essentially is brainwashing. Their lineup now is O'Reilly, Beck, Hannity. Three conservatives in a row.
mastgrr 3 years ago
And MSNBC is as pure as the wind driven snow. ABC,CBS,NBC are stacked with liberals. CNN has cleaned up MOST of it's act, but still leans slightly to the left. All conservatives have is Fox News and you want to complain about it? I am a MODERATE, but think that if Liberals have their networks, there is NOTHING wrong with conservatives having thiers.
fahs 3 years ago
True, there are many more conservative commentators on Fox, but Fox's coverage of the election was the most fair of any network. The other networks pushed a much higher percentage of negative stories about McCain/Palin than they did Obama/Biden (I think MSNBC was 80/20), while Fox had a 50/50 ratio of negative campaign stories. Complain all you want about the commentators, but you gotta admit that they were more fair than any other network this election season in terms of negative coverage.
odawgg1 3 years ago
Sara Palin too clearly demonstrated what PUPPETS our PRESIDENTS and Vice Presidents are, Obviously fools like Sara couldn't run the Country.
After Bush that was just too much for America to handle.
MEXICANCONGRESSOCT10 3 years ago 3
Shuster is openly and unapologetically biased against Palin in the most hateful way and for Obama, making him such a Libtard prick.
NoGuff 3 years ago 2
to use your own words, you can't produce any examples for your claim. good luck with that, sweetheart.
GstateBALLER925 3 years ago
"to use your own words, you can't produce any examples for your claim. good luck with that, sweetheart."
--Ummmm.....yeah. This video. Duh! Damn, how stupid are you?
NoGuff 3 years ago
HAHAHAHAHAH... nice one, chief. try again.
GstateBALLER925 3 years ago
David Shyster, fucktard Jew
right92626 3 years ago
Yo, David Shuster kicks ass. I've never loved an anchor before, but he's changed my mind. Go David!
bosco7 3 years ago
thats what I been saying forever the news people are assy
watco56 3 years ago
Shoo-ster
mopar2fast 3 years ago
what an ass
watco56 3 years ago 2
I love how Shuster doesn't even deny MSNBC being bias.
Blank3 3 years ago 2
wow.... MSDNC IS a Joke...
This proves it.
nxrisetaker2003 3 years ago
no, THIS just proves that right wing sycophants like thomas zeigler need to find better things to do than try and prop up sarah palin as a pinnacle of conservatism.
GstateBALLER925 3 years ago
Do people even watch MSNBC? Fucking joke.
PeterUlmer 3 years ago
yes millions of people. do people actually take fox news seriously? now THAT is a fucking joke.
GstateBALLER925 3 years ago
Your only defense of MSNBC is to attack Fox. I understand. I can't think of a defense for MSNBC either.
EmeraldAlmond 3 years ago
there is no defense for any of the media you moron. how are you going to defend fox news? "they are fair and balanced"... "they arent the obama network"... "they actually debate compared to olbermann"... it gets really old after a while.
GstateBALLER925 3 years ago
I didn't bring fox into the conversation. You did. That's your obsession. I'm just pointing out the fact that your only defense of MSNBC is to attack another network. You are just a fanboi for far left hacks like MSNBC. Its not your fault, you are just too dumb to know better. All you know about Fox probably comes from bathtub boy olberman and you have his poster on your bedroom ceiling.
EmeraldAlmond 3 years ago
i never said you brought them into the conversation... i brought them in because they are part of the media, just like msnbc and cnn are as well. my defense of msnbc is not to attack fox news... i attack fox news because i am pointing out their attempt at deceiving their viewers and claiming they are fair and balanced when they arent. msnbc and cnn dont make those claims. oh im a "fanboi" am i? tell me more einstein. clearly you dont know any better than to bash me without knowing me.
GstateBALLER925 3 years ago
i know more about fox news and its media distortion than you ever will because i actually do my research. and i dont need to hear it from olbermann. sure, i watch olbermann all the time, i enjoy him as entertainment, just like people enjoy oreilly for entertainment. the difference is oreilly is quite possibly clinically insane and has trouble telling the truth. he just tries to instill his agenda into his viewers instead of being honest. and i dont praise olbermann, so get it right, asshole.
GstateBALLER925 3 years ago
Oh haha!! An Olbermann viewer claiming to do research. Bathtub boy doesn't even believe his own BS but you lap it up. Yes you are so hard to know. I'm sure you are very deep. Or so you tell others who tend to strongly suspect otherwise. O'reilly might be insane but he makes Olbermann look like a neglected severely beaten down syndrome baby thrown into a trash heap on prom night so his mother could free up time to snort her next line. The other nuts at MSNBC won't even sit with him at lunch.
EmeraldAlmond 3 years ago
yea... as an olbermann viewer (and olbermann himself), i do much more research than any fox news viewer (and fox news commentator) will ever do. olbermann is taken more seriously than any bullshit oreilly hannity and limbaugh spew. lol are you serious? do you actually hold oreilly to that high of regard? whats wrong with you? what has oreilly done that is so useful for people in this country? nobody finds him credible and people only watch him because he is a nutcase and delivers great comedy.
GstateBALLER925 3 years ago
I only hold O'reilly in much higher regard than Bathtub Boy Olbermann. That still doesn't say much for O'Reilly. Just how little I think of Bathtub Boy. You are seriously undermining your claim of doing any research by even admitting to being a Bathtub Boy viewer. Olberdork wont even have a conservative on his show because Keithy will be made to look like the whimpering idiot he is. He only has ass kissers on his show to keep his little fanbois in the dark and idolizing him.
EmeraldAlmond 3 years ago
"I only hold O'reilly in much higher regard than Bathtub Boy Olbermann."
wow thats pretty pathetic.
"That still doesn't say much for O'Reilly. Just how little I think of Bathtub Boy."
i dont think anybody cares what you think of either of them.
"You are seriously undermining your claim of doing any research by even admitting to being a Bathtub Boy viewer."
oh really, dingle berry? so now im undermining myself because i watch olbermann... i also watched h&c and billo too. what does that say?
GstateBALLER925 3 years ago
"Olberdork wont even have a conservative on his show because Keithy will be made to look like the whimpering idiot he is."
wow good theory, sweetheart. where did you come up with that load of crap? do you have any proof? didnt think so. by the way, olbermann has had plenty of conservatives on his show. nice try, though.
"He only has ass kissers on his show to keep his little fanbois in the dark and idolizing him."
right, whatever you say... illiterate dumbfuck. learn to spell correctly.
GstateBALLER925 3 years ago
"Fox wasn't the subject of the video and yet you keep bringing it in as some lame relativism argument for MSNBC's behavior."
thanks for pointing that out for the 10th time... i appreciate it, really. but once again, what im doing is pointing out fnc's bias with the medias bias as a whole. i never said msnbc is fair, and neither is fnc. get it now?
"As if your opinion that fox behaves badly is an excuse for MSNBC to behave badly."
um no, where did i say that? who are you trying to fool here?
GstateBALLER925 3 years ago
"Until you came to the defense of Olbermann, you could possibly have tried to pass yourself off as something other than a left wing fanboi."
once again, showing your illiteracy. *sighs* i guess idiots like you never learn.
"But it is too late."
really? does it look like a give a shit? nice try, butch.
"There is no defense for Bathtub Boy yet you think there is. Thus you are a far left fanboi."
what is that 3 times in 2 comments? how obsessed are you with saying that word? keep it up.
GstateBALLER925 3 years ago
I get it, you think you deserve to be called a Fanboy? You are well below that rank. You are a far left Fanboi.
EmeraldAlmond 3 years ago
wow.. thanks for clarifying that little mix up for me... i was dying to know which immature nickname you were going to give me. its interesting to see that you like to give me the misspelled one... or maybe you just dont know how to spell. way to go, chief.
GstateBALLER925 3 years ago
Your research skills are showing again. Sad. Yet I love how you can't handle the names thrown at you while not shy about tossing names at others.
EmeraldAlmond 3 years ago
yes and your research skills show clear as day because you have nothing to present other than your skewed opinions.
GstateBALLER925 3 years ago
Projecting much? a the guy who can't even use google before he spouts off wants to comment on other people's research skills?
EmeraldAlmond 3 years ago
idiot much? "a the guy"? having trouble spelling again? wow... seems to be a daily occurrence for you. buddy, you cant even cite your sources or back up your claims... you just say so and so said this, and cant even say where it came from. i really hope you dont plan on debating or being a journalist professionally because youd get tossed out on your ass before they even interview you. good luck with that.
GstateBALLER925 3 years ago
I just can't get the data past your complete lack of reading comprehension skills. Jump on the typo. It's the only argument you can make effectively. You don't know your head from your ass but at least you seem proud of that fact.
EmeraldAlmond 3 years ago
lol what data? you dont have a shred of data to show let alone the bullshit you pull out of your ass. why dont you actually get a half decent argument against nbc and msnbc instead of picking on blown up trucks from 15 years ago. if you are really that desperate to bash nbc with stories like that, then you are clearly delusional. i mean seriously, at the pace your going, youll be lucky to even have a brain cell left with all the garbage you come up with. how pathetic.
GstateBALLER925 3 years ago
Right, you simply hijacked the thread for a dissertation on media bias in general. Thank you Professor Dumbass. Thats no excuse for MSNBC being the "WORST NETWORK IN THE WORLD". Try again.
EmeraldAlmond 3 years ago
hijacked the thread? lmao... what a joke. so now im a video hijacker because i want to state my opinion and debate with somebone who uses braindead arguments to support fox news? thanks professor asshat. what other bullshit you got shoved up your ass?
GstateBALLER925 3 years ago
So you defend MSNBC by attacking Fox news and then cry when someone debunks your arguments? I'm not defending Fox or anyone. I can see how correcting your absurd errors might look that way to you. Please, continue with your hissy fit.
EmeraldAlmond 3 years ago
you have not debunked a single thing, idiot... you have just countered it with your own opinion which means nothing because you cant produce actual facts. show me just one thing that you have debunked that i have said. i bet you wont find anything. i have barely made any claims where i have to back it up... i have mostly defended msnbc here, and when attacking fox i use proof that is well documented from watching the channel, whereas you dont. and if needed, ill show plenty of video proof.
GstateBALLER925 3 years ago
You just admitted to not knowing NBC rigged gas tanks and you didn't know McClellan backed down from his own story. His original book was going to attack the press but then they gave him more money to write a different book. So you've been proven to be wrong by your own admission and have failed to prove you watch anything but far left nonsense. Grow up kid.
EmeraldAlmond 3 years ago
show me proof that he backed down from his story moron... if you think im just going to believe w/e BS you say, good luck, bc you havent been able to prove anything you have said with a simple link or article, and then you tell me to go do research for you. again, thats not how it works in the real world... maybe in your stupid life. lmao you think im going to believe your bullshit about mccllelan? obviously you have an agenda to smear him bc he exposed fox news, so please try again. pathetic.
GstateBALLER925 3 years ago
Wow, you can't be this stupid. Everybody knows this story. Maybe you need to get your news from someplace other than MessNBC. Google "McClellan backs down" and read all about your hero and stop acting like such a brain dead idiot and showing everyone what little you know. You set a perfect example of the typical MSNBC viewer. A shrill uninformed idiot who can't do even the most basic research.
EmeraldAlmond 3 years ago
hey idiot, the only thing mccllelan said he messd up on was in the interview with matthews when the questions were phrased badly. he never backed down on the entire allegations of fox news receiving white house talking points. he confirmed that and it is well documented. stop trying to link one comment from mccllelan as him breaking down and admiting he lied. he strictly meant the matthews interview and he specified that to oreilly as well. tyical idiots like you... taking quotes out of context.
GstateBALLER925 3 years ago
by the way, if anyone is misinformed here, its you because you cant even cite your sources or back up your lies. and then whatever claims you make, they end up being untrue and i debunk them and you continue to look like a stupid jackass who doesnt even believe his own bullshit. as an msnbc viewer, im very informed, and i still do my my research when i hear things in the media... i dont just believe whatever they say. you dont know shit so shut the fuck up.
GstateBALLER925 3 years ago
For all your bitching about sources, you have failed to provide any. For all your bitching about links, you have failed to provide any. You don't know the most basic facts about stories that everybody already knows about and everybody is laughing at you. Keith Olbermann is probably laughing at your level of stupidity and youre his biggest fan. You can keep claiming you are informed but you have completely failed to prove it at even the most basic level.
EmeraldAlmond 3 years ago
You are a real idiot. McClellen said, "The truth is I messed up. I was specifically not trying to single anyone out, including you. But the way a couple of the questions were phrased in that interview along with my response left things open to interpretation and I should not have let that happen." So he is blaming all the accusations on "interpretations" and trying to weasel away from his allegations. If you are trying to defend him now, you'd be the first to do so.
EmeraldAlmond 3 years ago
we already went over this... he apologized for getting bad questioning from chris matthews and not answering them clearly. he never backed down on his complete allegations of fox news and receiving talking points. if they werent true, he wouldnt have written a book talking about it and other issues regarding bush. take your head out of your ass and stop trying to convince yourself of something that you have no idea how to defend. its getting annoying to have to repeat myself to a dumbass.
GstateBALLER925 3 years ago
Other than the token conservative Pat Buchanan and he only allows him on when they agree. Only people who kiss his ass are allowed on the show and only far left libtards that wish they could kiss his ass watch his show unless looking for comedy. You dream of french kissing his ass.
EmeraldAlmond 3 years ago
"Other than the token conservative Pat Buchanan and he only allows him on when they agree."
hah i love when you make these outrageous claims without backing it up other than your opinion that means nothing and holds absolutely no water. if you actually think your so called "opinion" actually means anything, then you need to get a new outlook on life bc you cant back it up with even a lick of evidence. um... wow, french kissing his ass? thanks for that image... good luck doing that to oreilly.
GstateBALLER925 3 years ago
Other than you claiming I'm not backing up my argument (which I did if you could read) where are you ever backing up your "arguement"? You demand a much higher level of proof from others than you can offer for your side. You can't even Google. I named the only 'conservative' Olberdork talks to and you got nothing for your argument but another hissy fit.
EmeraldAlmond 3 years ago
how did you back it up? all you said was olbermann brings on buchanan when they agree. how would you know that? did you actually see what they said to each other? do you have actual evidence to prove that they were agreeing? did you ever think that maybe they agreeing without yelling and screaming like the maniacs on fox news do? see once again, you cant seem to understand that backing up your claims means more than just saying it, but actually showing it and you have yet to do that. good luck.
GstateBALLER925 3 years ago
As a matter of fact I did watch. I watch MSNBC when I need a good laugh. It is funnier than the dailyshow because they don't even try. You are mad because you can't prove me wrong and you know it. Thus you are pretending it is my job to supply you with overwhelming proof that can get through to your tiny brain. I doubt one could prove to you that the earth is round.
EmeraldAlmond 3 years ago
oh you did watch? what did they say? what did buchanan and olbermann agree on? please do tell since your the research expert here. lmao funnier than the daily show... thats funny, as it happens, the daily show and comedy central in general is taken more seriously than fox news. there are people out there that probably go there for actual newsworthy stories instead of fox that just spews republican propaganda, and like an idiot, you continue to contribute to the cause of conservative bias.
GstateBALLER925 3 years ago
Like I keep transcripts on file just to debate some tool on the internet. I'm sure you really do take the Daily Show as serious news. Anyone who defends MessNBC would think the Daily Show is a good news source. Their viewers are just that stupid.
EmeraldAlmond 3 years ago
then stop admitting it! stop saying they agreed when you dont even know what they said. just say you saw it but your not sure what was said exactly. it doesnt kill you to admit youre wrong. you just like to assume that every guest olbermann brings on agrees with him because that is what you hear from other people and since you barely watch msnbc and countdown in general, you see one interview and just take that as being the evidence of what you hear through the grapevine. nice job.
GstateBALLER925 3 years ago
You are pathetic. All I'm saying I can't provide you with the damn transcript. You are demanding a level of proof that you yourself can't provide for your own argument and then pretending that means you are right. How stupid can you possibly be? Why should I take your word when I've seen it myself? Olbermann is a joke and all but his small audience knows it.
EmeraldAlmond 3 years ago
no "bub", your the pathetic one because you make a claim about something that you know you cant back up, and then you say "no really, it happened". just stop while your ahead... because nothing you try to claim holds water. you continue to drop the ball. good luck with that. and i never said he disagrees with his guests every time, but it has happened. just because he doesnt debate like oreilly and hannity doesnt mean he doesnt disagree. thats just his style, and his 2m viewers a night enjoy it.
GstateBALLER925 3 years ago
I can prove it because you obviously can't prove me wrong despite really wanting to. How simple would it be to go find video of Olbermann really disagreeing with one of his guests if it is so common? How pathetic is it that you can't even find one? Yet you expect me to provide you with every transcript ever made of him agreeing with his guests just to prove he always does. You are just bad stupid.
EmeraldAlmond 3 years ago
oh im mad huh? is that why i keep laughing at your ridiculous allegations and bold face lies? ive already proven you wrong, and you desperately keep trying to counter my beatings on you with false claims. um, chief... it is your job to show proof. so in your world you can make w\e claims you want, and we have to check if youre right? im not your fact checker. stop your bitching and actually put some effort into backing up your claims. and you say you do your homework... clearly you dont.
GstateBALLER925 3 years ago
I can't seem to post an outside link. Its not accepting them. Maybe my fault for having a life outside Youtube. But you claim you are so great at research yet couldn't be bothered to put "NBC Exploding Gas tank" into google or "McClellen backed down". Two stories everyone knows about already. So instead you toss insults and look like a moron for not even knowing these stories. Yes, you are a typical MSNBC viewer. You have proven my point.
EmeraldAlmond 3 years ago
Comment removed
GstateBALLER925 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
have you never seen a link posted on youtube before? its not that hard... if you werent mentally retarded, you could find a way around it. yea clearly you dont have a life since you manage to respond to my replies so quickly. on the other hand i have a life and a job to deal with, and i cant respond so quick. i already debunked both of those stories and you still keep convincing yourself that they are legitimate. you dont have shit... and you are a typical ignorant nut job with no arguments.
GstateBALLER925 3 years ago
You call eleven hours quick? I have a job and a life and it just doesn't take very long to respond to your nonsense. I guess you are just slow. Post a link. Show us how its done. I don't see one posted in this entire section. Looks like you tried but failed to post one.
EmeraldAlmond 3 years ago
compared to how long i take to reply, yeah you do it pretty quick. you must not have jack shit to do. i have a job too, and a girlfriend, and friends, and other priorities. thats something you cant say for yourself because youd be lucky to have any of those. well i have posted links before, as i mentioned, but i guess youtube is cracking down on it. i already explained how it has been done and what i did to try and post them, but oh well.
GstateBALLER925 3 years ago
no you didnt back up your argument... do you call what you have said in all your posts as proof and facts? wow... you havent been able to prove anything you have said with solid facts, frankly bc you dont have any and have no knowledge about any of the idiotic claims you make. all you have to say are immature words like "fanboi" and making up stupid nicknames for olbermann. btw, when did i ever spell argument "arguement"? or can you not spell right consistently?
GstateBALLER925 3 years ago
I think you should stick to finding spelling mistakes rather than try to defend MSNBC. You just are not very good at defending MessNBC. Are these so-called "idiotic claims" the same ones you just fail to Google? Are you going to use your age as an excuse again when you find out I'm right?
EmeraldAlmond 3 years ago
i think you should stick to trying to type a coherent sentence without having a huge brain fart that causes your retardation to take over. oh no, not only am i good at defending msnbc, based on my ability to actually research, but im great at proving fox to be the propaganda machine that it is. it will be interesting to watch how much their bias will unravel with obama in office and al franken in the senate... those 2 things alone will drive oreilly absolutely nuts. should be a blast!
GstateBALLER925 3 years ago
My sentences contain substance while yours are the incoherent ranting of a twenty year old far left moonbat. I'm sure MessNBC is thrilled to have your support. You are the perfect example of their pathetic audience. I think Obama is more of a problem for MessNBC. How long can they keep tonguing his ass before even their most left wing fanbois require accuracy and perspective? And Franken? You actually like this tool? Hes already an embarrassment.
EmeraldAlmond 3 years ago
lol i highly doubt substance is the right word for your frivolous statements and false claims... esp since you lack the ability to prove them or back them up. you are a typical moron that sympathizes with fox news and their own misstatements while trying to act like you know it all. you wouldnt know wtf youre talking about if that BS shot out of your ass. actually msnbc has already went after obama... olbermann already called him out on the choice of panetta in the cia and rev warren. idiot.
GstateBALLER925 3 years ago
the only thing you have perspective on is how much propaganda you preach that fox news and blowhards like hannity limbaugh and oreilly shove down your throat. that is all you know and it shows in every one of your posts. still bitter about franken winning huh? yeah... you must be a huge oreilly fan. and you wont admit it either... its ok, its obvious you love what he tells you to believe. i really hope you enjoy the democrats in control as much as oreilly and fox news will.
GstateBALLER925 3 years ago
Limbaugh doesn't work for Fox and those offering their opinion on Fox admit they are commentators unlike the hacks on MSNBC who claim they can wear both hats. You really do like franken don't you? I don't know if "winning" is the word. They have more votes than voters. He will probably get the spot but it doesn't say much for liberals. I'm glad democrats are in control. After all the far left's hypocrisy and bitching we can now all see if they are willing to put up or shut up.
EmeraldAlmond 3 years ago
oh please, limbaugh is practically an extension of fox news' talking points. he may not work for them, but he shares a lot of the views and ideologies that beck, hannity and oreilly do. dont even go there. no i dont really like franken, i just like the fact that his seat in the senate pisses off oreilly. its a great sight to see. whatever... make all your excuses. and dont worry... democrats will do more good for this country in the next 2 years than the republicans did in the last 8. well see.
GstateBALLER925 3 years ago
Anyone who doesn't think like you or share your ideology is a bad person. Any network that lets these people speak is a bad network. That's what your real problem is. You don't care if MSNBC is honest just that they say what you want to hear. How very "open minded" of you. Everyone should want fair and honest elections regardless of who wins and Franken doesn't make your side look good. I hope the democrats can do good but the media's roll is to keep them honest and I don't see MSNBC doing that.
EmeraldAlmond 3 years ago
Oh they attacked Obama from the left. Yes wow, that took balls for them. Pat them on the back. Did you buy the NBC News Historical DVD "Yes We Can! The Barack Obama Story!" Yet? It's a real DVD by our favorite 'unbiased' news organization. No, debunking your accusations about Fox doesn't mean I sympathize with them. I'm objective and like the truth. Not an MSNBC fanboi like yourself.
EmeraldAlmond 3 years ago
yes something fox news barely or basically never has done to the right. what a shocker. why would i buy that dvd? i dont need it. thanks. either way, im sure its better to watch it than the ass kissing and brown nosing that fox news did for all the republicans, especially painting bush as some sort of a patriot and proclaiming guiliani as "america's mayor". haha... the only way fox news responds to their bias accusations is by saying that they were the first ones to report on bush's dui story.
GstateBALLER925 3 years ago
You don't need to buy the DVD because you already watch MSNBC. You got to watch the Obama Network live. Fox news at least doesn't pretend Hannity isn't a commentator. All your complaints about Fox revolve around their commentators. At least they are upfront about who their commentators are. I dont think anyone at Fox is trying to pass Hannity off as unbiased as MSNBC did with Olbermann and Matthews.
EmeraldAlmond 3 years ago
and please explain to me how pat buchanan is a token conservative... hes got opinions that the lunatic sean hannity would agree with, so why dont you figure out what a real conservative is instead of just assuming that the ones from fox news are real conservatives. its the ones like buchanan, joe scarborough, tucker carlson that really stand up for the conservative movement, not the neo cons and nutcases that fox news panders to. fox news couldnt even give ron paul a fair shake in the primaries.
GstateBALLER925 3 years ago
He is a token in that the libs bring him out only when he supports their opinion just from a slightly different angle. He makes good points but he is used so they can claim "balance" even when not presenting the other side. Tucker and Joe are RINOs. Yet Joe gives MSNBC some hope. Hannity and BOR are commentators. Unlike MSNBC that plays Olbermann and Chrisy as journalists. Ron Pauls problem is Ron Paul. He couldn't get enough voters behind him and you can only devote time to a loser for so long.
EmeraldAlmond 3 years ago
oh is that right? is that why matthews brings him on hardball so he can have a yelling debate with another liberal? is that why him and scarborough tag team mika or some liberal on morning joe yelling at them about how useful of a tactic torture is in gitmo? yea that happens because ive seen it since i watch morning joe every morning. how are tucker and joe rinos? they have constantly defended bush and claimed he has kept us safe since 9/11. they are true republicans... hannity and billo arent.
GstateBALLER925 3 years ago
furthermore, oreilly claims he is a registered independent, yet he continuously defends republicans and claims he is a "traditionalist"... his typical way of making up words so that he wont admit what he really is... a conservative. however, matthews, who voted for bush in 2000, and olbermann dont keep bringing on people to yell them down and act all tough and passionate like they are some lunatic blowhards like fox news promotes. that is the difference and you have a lot of trouble getting it.
GstateBALLER925 3 years ago
Again you are attacking fox for what their commentators do and not what their anchors do. MSNBC doesn't know the difference either. The level of hypocrisy you show is astounding. But you are just a kid and do not know any better. Olbermann just yells for the hell of it. Why would he yell at guests when he only has them on when they agree with him? No he just declares everyone who he doesn't agree with "THE WORST PERSON IN THE WORLD". Bathtub boy doesn't even believe his own crap.
EmeraldAlmond 3 years ago
the commentators are the anchors you sniveling moron. oreilly thinks hes a journalist and continues to act like his opinion is actually taken seriously. just like you, he tries to back up his proof with quotes taken out of context and just goes on a complete attack tirade from the very beginning of his show until the end. it always starts with his talking pts memo rants and then he adds more comedy with his pinheads and patriots. does he actually think that people watch him with a straight face?
GstateBALLER925 3 years ago
No you pathetic moron, only on MSNBC do they completely ignore those lines. News anchors read the straight news off the teleprompter. Commentators give their opinions on whatever topics they want to discuss. You don't know the difference because you watch MSNBC. That's why you can't understand how other networks operate.
EmeraldAlmond 3 years ago
lmao... so because i watch msnbc i dont know the difference between news and opinion? oh yeah... im sure you get a chalk full of fair reporting and opinion separately on fnc? god you are a moron. every single fox news show has an anchor that displays their bias opinion. there are no straight reporters at fox news other than the ones that do the quick news updates between commercials. and those people are barely ever on or have their own show. ill give the benefit of the doubt on that one. lol
GstateBALLER925 3 years ago
also,