Added: 4 years ago
From: Thunderf00t
Views: 19,322
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (267)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The creationists/fundamentalist Christians don't want a Democracy. They want a fascist Theocracy.

  • I don't believe Kent Hovind is actually a creationist. I just think he's pretending to make money.

  • Kent Hovind is the best evidence that we came from primitive apes there is. Seeing you speak Kent makes me realize that God is dead.

  • I enjoy reading the comments of these stupid Christians saying that Thunderf00t's videos have no substance and he's the actual stupid one.

    Look at him now.

  • @manasseh41

    Do you have any evidence to back up your claims?

    I mean, outside of the bible, because that book has many mistranslations and misquotations as well as different versions, not to mention many different branches of believers who interpret it differently, so the bible is not much of a reliable source.

    Again, do you have any evidence to back up your claims?

  • @manasseh41 did you just make this is up as you went along, or is there a reason to believe this?

  • holdenbane, Please copy and send me the comment you're reffering to. as I have no access to it. all I see is a removed comment from 2 months ago.

  • Thunderf00t, I first came across your videos around a year ago. Over this past week I've started watching your "Why do people laugh at creationists?" series again; then I came upon this video and the one about your apendicitis.

    I need to tell you: I'm repeatedly impressed with your intelligence, but even more touched by your passion. In every video, the music and images you use ALWAYS provokes in me the emotions you obviously intended. As a mind, a heart and a fellow human being I thank you.

  • i completely agree with that, well said

  • I share a similar experience and firmly concur.

  • @micheltow Me too

  • Whoever stated that violence isn't a part of natural human behaviour has no idea of what he's talking about, and must have lived under a rock for like, the entire history of mankind.

  • boob u spelt it right this time... mwhahahahahahahahahahahahahaha­ha...

  • retarded punks=retarded videos

  • another 5/5

  • anyone know what song this is?

  • Big Mistake by Natalie Imbruglia.

  • he's no einstein

  • it's meant to point out the fact that Kent Hovind tried to censor people who were against his position. In reponse, 127 videos of the video were posted.

    Pwned as in, owned in a pwned way and democracy bitches because our democracy was setup so everyone could have their say- and people have shown what they thought of kent hovind.

    they're merely playful terms, i'm surprised that you actually are refuting the jokes rather then defend Kent's position.

  • Dude, this song is amazing who sings it?

  • actually even if there is an afterlife, that afterlife could be: allah, thor, zeus, ... whatever god. or it could even be a god which actually had no religion on earth and created the universe afterall without the dumb need to praise him since his character is strong enough to get along without that. Oh yes, the old 'i used to be an atheist' thing.. should that convince me or anyone? sorry. next time maybe.

  • "you obviously have a life full of sex, violence and enjoy this!"

    How do you come to that conclusion?

    "you actually spend time to read the bible..."

    ...then you'll find it's full of violence

    Nothing wrong with sex of course; violence on the other hand...

  • Well I also find that there's nothing wrong with violence too... It is part of human nature... But fortunately we have reason and know how to restrict ourselves... We don't have sex with every woman we meet in the street and we don't use violence randomly.. We CAN and ARE using them in a reasonable manner...

  • "We CAN and ARE using them in a reasonable manner"

    I agree; but fundamentalists generally try to pretend that consentual sex is a bad thing. It's not

  • ''If it was human nature, then our schools would be teaching and promoting the idea of violence''

    Since when schoosl teach and promote whatever is part of human nature.... And have you ever heard of a term ''self-control''??

  • It's a big debate if even ''human nature'' exists anyway or we're tabula rassa as John Locke claimed... I don't believe in ''correct'' and ''incorrect'' it's a relative term as is morality... Reason and rational thought is a primal characteristic of humans so it helps us even supress other ''natural'' urgues of us.... Only the fact that we find ourselves wanting to express violently sometimes implies that that characteristic is in factum, even a small portion of our nature...

  • jojogamer9 - If violence was not a part of human nature there would be no need for the schools to teach correct social behaviors, like don't yell at other people, show respect to others and no guns or fighting.

    If we were not a threat to one another we would not have the behaviors that we call manners which are designed to establish restrictive social boundaries to restrain us.

    But we are violent when we feel a need to be and peaceful if that serves our purposes better.

    Most of us at least.

  • Schools are not supposed to teach morals.

    What, you think this is the early 20th century or something?

  • "If it was human nature, then our schools would be teaching and promoting the idea of violence."

    -No.

    -(For example) Human nature is to reproduce as much as possible before you die, as to continue our species and preserve your genes. Do schools teach that? Absolutely not.

  • Who said schools ever taught children what was natural? Violence is a large part of human nature. No one said it was the first thing we resort to in any given situation.

  • @jojogamer9 what the HELL are you talking about? fucking everything we find attractive is ALSO animal (that's right) nature. that doesn't mean we are going to teach our children to be whores. have you EVER read a history book? why if something is in our nature, should we automatically embrace it? somethings in this world aren't all rainbows and unicorns and your naivety won't change that.

  • I would also probably turn theist after a near death experience.... The mind undergoes a huge shock... But this doesn't really prove anything...

  • "you obviously have a life full of sex, violence and enjoy this!"

    No I actually live pretty peacefully. Shouldnt all married couples have a life full of sex?

  • Thunderf00t you are my hero. Thank you for standing up to these crazy "fooled again" Christians who want us to believe that Noah was a dinosaur rancher. Keep up the good work!!!!

  • And I'll be thinking for you :)

  • pwnd :D

  • A a aaa.. we don't hate you guys, we just think you're stupid.. :) ..we leave the hate stuff to you and your loving god.

  • ICorinthians Chapter 1

    18For the message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God.

    we preach Christ crucified: a stumbling block to Jews and foolishness to Gentiles, 24but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God. 25For the foolishness of God is wiser than man's wisdom, and the weakness of God is stronger than man's strength.

  • "jninny" thanks for your comment...you are not alone. God is working on these people.

    God loves them and no matter how much they use abusive speech some of them want to find the Truth and they are seeking the truth.

    Some of them are "bummed" at all the evil and suffering in the world. They don't under stand the human element is fudemental. We are our own worst enemies until JESUS opens our hearts. God has given me love and patience for internet junkies.

  • abusive speech? does that include using a small quote from somebody(usually dead, its easier with no rebuttle) to portray the exact opposite of their actual beliefs? kent did it all the time, and i would hope you cristians would view this as the "false witness" it clearly is. you can believe what you want as far as creation goes, but telling lies(even if you think its for god) is still wrong.

  • Good thing you didn't go into how you feel about us, or else we might not look quite as condescending :)

  • Are you going to worship me now? You said!

    Satan! you are a defeated foe and in the Name of the Son of David who made atonement in his blood for this person's sin release him!

    You shall worship the LORD-GOD and Him only.

    YESHUA conquered you at the cross as the LAMB OF GOD and you know your days are short. The LION of the Tribe of Judah is coming and every eye shall see HIM.

    Now I say to you Maltez92 JESUS came into this world to LIGHT every man and to overcome the darkness. REPENT

  • hovind is in for a good 10 years in prison :D

  • they all look like forest gump..

    except heartless

  • Forget all of that stupid shit.

  • Every light casts a shadow, and blinding light brings only darkness.

    I feared your god once, now I find that such fear is bollocks.

  • god doesnt write books. humans write books. humans are flawed. your book is flawed. your quotes hold only the merit that believers give them, and a rational mind would give them no merit at all.

  • the same reason i did for around 18 yrs, my parents told me it was so. and for a few years i also believed in santa clause for the same reason. even christian scientist dont believe in a literal interpretation of the bible. they read it for inspiration, not historical facts. a rational mind seeks evidence to support a claim, it doesnt just pick the most convenient explanation. what libraries are you refering to? not scientific ones, so far as i can tell you've only read one book your whole life.

  • utubejvs3.. would you bet your health/life on your word? reject scientists medicines in favour of going to the church in your time of need?

    I have before, went straight to hospital when at risk of losing my left hand, never prayed at all! Now would you prove your faith by going to the house of god for help?

    PROVE YOUR FAITH TO YOURSELF!

    So you are same religion as your parents, how did that happen?? chance??

    Or indoctrination at an early age?

  • Err wrong, when you die you will be a pile of bones the same as any atheist.

    Take a shovel to a grave yard for proof.

    And please don't give me the sole goes on routine.

    We can manipulate our DNA yet no sole is found so.. don't count on life after death by spending your whole life toading to god.

    I bet you are the same religion as your parents right? you didn't answer before....Please tell me!

    YOU ARE THE SAME RELIGION AS YOUR PARENTS,..HOW ORIGINAL...WHAT A COINCIDENCE!

  • Resurrection?...See now we have a problem, it just cannot happen. And I don't need to go to any website to know that. Allow commen sense to prevail when you read something. You know the stuff that means you can use your sane judgement. Just because something is wrapped in a cover saying bible on it, you should allways use common sense. Did I love my parents? yes and without the need for religion. Guess what I also have morals and empathy for others without religion.....SUPRISE!

  • More bible crap I see, and when are you going to quote some af the realy vile stuff about killing etc?

    You religious freaks are just copying what mummy and daddy pumped into you at a young age!

    Let me take a wild guess...You are the same religion as your parents!!

    What a coincidence you happen by chance to find the same god!

    Or maybe just maybe you were brainwashed as a kid to follow mummy and daddy without question?

    Think about it fool!!

  • LSD trips lead you to god in 1969 the year I was born. Well that probably is not such a credible way to find god.

    You say you spent 10 years in universities and colleges? doing what? teaching bible studies, biology instructor, or logistics?

    Am I sure of myself well yes actually I bet my life on it by accepting vaccines designed by virologists that take advantage of the fact we have an EVOLVED immune system, drugs tested on animals with a similar immune response.Can you reject vaccines and pray

  • 35 A good man out of the good treasure of his heart[a] brings forth good things, and an evil man out of the evil treasure brings forth evil things. 36 But I say to you that for every idle word men may speak, they will give account of it in the day of judgment. 37 For by your words you will be justified, and by your words you will be condemned."

    Matthew 12:27-35

    see truthnet . org for real answers

  • One thing religious freaks forget is that life is NOT that unique when the right conditions are by luck, there.

    We have found life in places we thought neverb possible, a camera returned after 2 years approx in space was found to contain bacteria sneezed in by an assembly technician, later grown in a lab the bacteria survived. I have seen mould grow in a radar cooling system where the water was so pure it didn't conduct electricity, this mould took approx 6 months to grow, no light, food?

  • haha love it 127 reposts in a day very cool! well done to all and many thanks, Religion should not be allowed to stop our best minds/scientists from improving life.

    The religious should show a little more respect to the people that develope the technology and medicine they take for granted every day!

    Without our top scientists we would be living as we did 4000 years ago!

  • Scientism? Sounds a bit like a familiar cult.

  • Scientism? Just making up words now?

  • We are in danger of losing our grip on the concepts of truth, evidence, objectivity, disinterested inquiry. The preposterous environment in which academic work is presently conducted is inhospitable to genuine inquiry, hospitable to the sham and the fake. Encouraging both envy and resentment of the sciences, it has fed an increasingly widespread and articulate irrationalism. Scientism is anti or pseudo science that avoids critical thinking.

  • Us 'losing our grip on the concepts of truth, evidence, objectivity, disinterested inquiry' is actually the progression of education.

    Realize the trend.. The more knowledge and more educated people are, more atheists there are.

  • There we go reaching for the magic again!

  • Magic is the new Neo-Darwiniac term for something made up or fair tale, untested but not real science. Now let me ask you what magic have you swallowed? Abiogenesis?

    Macro-evolution? Do you know that these are unobservable and the magic code word used is time. Unfortunately time does not provide information. Information in the design of all things demands very specific intelligence.

    Sorry but Dawkins so far has failed the test of life. Are you sure you want to follow him into eternity?

  • Neo-Darwiniac is the new Jew amirite?

  • Thank you...

    Many of us admire this man of God.

    It is a shame due to tax problems people are discounting his brilliant apologetics of Biblica Roots of Creation.

    He is in my prayers. Keep up the good work!

  • Actually there's a very small range of disagreement in physics and biology. There is a consensus life evolved, the arguments are over the 'how' it evolved. In physics there's almost no disagreement other than in fields like string theory.

    And we have found things man has recorded over 6000 years old, The neolithic settlement Skara Brae in Northern Scotland is thought to be about 7-9000 years old.

    And you still haven't said anything about radiometric dating which we know to be accurate.

  • For a mutation to happen no new molecules are needed because there are only four chemicals which make up DNA. If you look at a strand they are represented by T,D,G and A and the information DNA carries can be completely changed by rearranging them. It sounds like DNA should be simple, but there are 3 Billion of these chemicals in each string of modern DNA or RNA. Now the first life would have been very simple and short, RNA strands formed out of proteins and adedine reacting.

  • There is nothing simple about DNA and its role. Who wrote the programming? You haven't a clue! You can state it as loud and definitive as you want but DNA does not prove man came from simple molecules to man over billions of years. That is your religion not mine. Each animal has a common ancestor but it is a forest of many unrelated species not a tree. You can't see it but you do everything to suppress it but your system of "scientism" will fail because your foundation is in error.

  • DNA isn't simple, but it isn't beyond our grasp. If each animal has a common ancestor but those are seperate from a universal common ancestor, why do we share DNA in a manner exactly consistent with the Phylogenetic predictions?

    What would it look like if evolution were true? What would we see now that we don't? What if your foundation was neautral, what would a world made by evolution look like?

  • Not beyond your grasp..hey? Try creating something that lives without using living material!  I do not see evolution at all.

    What would creation look like if true and GOD judged the earth and all realms of nature due to man's sin? You would see the teleology of His design and distinct creature with similar body systems for our world and a unique biosphere for life. You would see provision for man and animals in the way of food and water.

    All planned! Deny him but GOD IS not WAS.

  • Yo.

    I don't think you answered my question. What would it look like if evolution were true. What would you need to see in order for you to say "wow, that might have some truth to it."

  • If evolution were true and a process as described by most of its enthusiasts we would have more species developing all of the time.

    We would see many transitional species and more mutations of sorry looking creatures that are not whole. We do not see this ugly picture. There are some mutation but few.

    Every specie is whole, complete and suited for live and survival overall. There are many variations within a species of a kind but distinct from all other major kinds and or species. God is!

  • You don't understand how evolution works. We have sorry looking creatures born all the time (two headed snakes, ect) but they die off. They don't reproduce. The best fitting creature of each population does.

    The Playtpus is an example of a living transitional species. They have just decoded its genome and found it has reptilian and mammalian characteristics.

    Check out the wikipedia entry on transitional fossils.

  • NO WE WOULDN'T because evolution happens over MILLIONS or BILLIONS of years. Think of how long a year is, then a millenium and you are off the time scale we are talking about by a factor of a million!You also assume that because something looks complicated it can't possibly be formed by basic composite particles reacting to form more and more complicated structures. You attempted to refute ONE of my statements without using any evidence against it. What about retroviruses or radiometric dating?

  • "You also assume that because something looks complicated it can't possibly be formed by basic composite particles reacting to form more and more complicated structures."

    No I do not assume anything. You assume that the information needed to design and implement the genetic code did not need a mind. Somehow time, that you can not prove is 'your god' and 'unguided random mindless chance' was the second person of your trinity.

    The third person is YOU as the interpreter of life. You an idolater

  • It is unguided but not random, there is only one path because any organism without beneficial traits will not live long enough to reproduce and pass negative traits on; so we know that most inherited traits are beneficial.

    And I can prove that there was enough time with radiometric dating. The stars, the stars millions of light years away, all of them prove there was enough time.

    And you assume the Bible to be true. And I don't assume, I know for a fact that magnets don't have a mind.

  • There are many parts to life and what matters.

    Knowing one field of understanding does not prepare you for eternity. I do not assume the Bible is true. God has left His signature all over the Scriptures in fulfilled prophecy and current events going on today. The greater purpose of life leads back to the Source of Life. God loves you personally He does not want you to remain in the darkness and futiliy or your unrepentant mind. In Christ are hidden the deepest mysteries of life. Search

  • These 'mutations' happen between generations. Now each generation has.. maybe 15-30 years between the next one.. and theres only the slightest change if any change.

    That's why it has took organisms Four billion years to get where they're at(not 6000 years).

  • YOU DO NOT NEED TO PROGRAM MOLECULES! They ALWAYS react in a predictable manner! ALWAYS! You will never start a nuclear reaction by burning potatoes, you will never have a situation where petrol doesn't burn when you light it! You don't need to program particles to attract eachother because of the forces which attract them anyway. How a chemical will react can be calculated using the standard model, if you put the data from the model into a computer you can find out why DNA is the shape it is!

  • Oh is that so...if you believe that you are ignorant beyond belief. Who designed chemistry and physics? You speak in circles because you want to deny the very source of life. Was your computer that you use to study DNA the random mindless product of time?

    You are intelligent but you lack real wisdom.

  • Is there a force which will pull the pieces of my computer together over time? NO! Is my computer incredibly simple? Are there only three types of working parts to it? NO! Chemicals are all made up of three types of particles, two varieties of quark and an electron. There are a few others floating about but for all intents and purposes they are made of nothing else. If another chemical other than a noble gas comes along and they have enough energy they will react; there is no question about it.

  • "You are intelligent but you lack real wisdom." 

    NO U

  • yes and? the bible also says whales are fish and bats are birds.

  • Is that true? hahaha if it is then how did a perfect god make such a big fuck up hehehe!

    Maybe god didn't go to Oxford university where he should have listened to Richard Dawkins.

  • Yes God made paedophiles too! What a bastard god is!

  • Chris your name is derived from Christian a follower of Christ or Christ likeness.

    What you misunderstand is that the planet is in its condition because of the judgement of sin.

    It effects mankind and nature. Fallen man is spiritually dead. A materialistic view of life does not have the answers for you. Oxford started out as a Christian Bible centered University. Your hostility and arrogance can be forgiven.

    take a look around at allaboutgod . com and you will find some answers.

  • thus rants on, this silly christian.

  • Yes I will rant on and on if I can by the love of God help one person like you from making an eternal mistake of disregarding and missing the pardon of Jesus Christ.

    see christiananswers . net

    This silly Christian believes you are worth saving from eternal darkness and judgment.

  • I praise eternal darkness. Fuck that child molesting faggot Jesus Christ. Fuck Jehova. Fuck that cunt mary.

    Spill the blood of the lamb. Take a shit over the book of lies. Piss on the altar of god. Destroy the crucifix.

    HAIL SATAN

    HAIL BELCEBUB

    HAIL LUCIFER

    HAIL BELIAL

  • 35 A good man out of the good treasure of his heart[a] brings forth good things, and an evil man out of the evil treasure brings forth evil things. 36 But I say to you that for every idle word men may speak, they will give account of it in the day of judgment. 37 For by your words you will be justified, and by your words you will be condemned."

    Matthew 12:27-35

    see truthnet . org for real answers

  • HAIL SATAN!

  • The movie "Devils Advocate" was brilliant! I would worship satan hahaha!

  • Satan is all that Jesus never is.

  • 35 A good man out of the good treasure of his heart[a] brings forth good things, and an evil man out of the evil treasure brings forth evil things. 36 But I say to you that for every idle word men may speak, they will give account of it in the day of judgment. 37 For by your words you will be justified, and by your words you will be condemned."

    Matthew 12:27-35

    see truthnet . org for real answers

  • 35 A good man out of the good treasure of his heart[a] brings forth good things, and an evil man out of the evil treasure brings forth evil things. 36 But I say to you that for every idle word men may speak, they will give account of it in the day of judgment. 37 For by your words you will be justified, and by your words you will be condemned."

    Matthew 12:27-35

    see truthnet . org for real answers

  • Funny that you keep quoting the bible being that we don't believe in it.

    Heres more bible fun:

    Ephesians 6:5

    Slaves and Masters 5 Slaves, obey your earthly masters with respect and fear, and with sincerity of heart, just as you would obey Christ.

  • You look for objections without thinking things through. God delivered the children of Israel from slavery. Christ died to set all men free spiritually. He did not instigate war in slave ridden countries but the very catalyst that has impacted the end of slavery the most is Christianity. So why are you a slave to sin (independent self centeredness and breaking God's Laws in thought and deed)

    So who is your master? The one you serve!

    Go to: allaboutGod . com

  • "God delivered the children of Israel from slavery. "

    He also ordered the genocide of the Midianites.

    "Christ died to set all men free spiritually. "

    BULLSHIT!

    "So who is your master? The one you serve!"

    SATAN... obviously.

  • The bible is a bunch of fiction made by man long after events may have happened.

    But lets face it, noah's arc has to be crap, size of boat to number of animals etc. Virgin birth hehehe!

    Do I need to go on?

    The amount of crap that any normal person cannot believe is unreal.

    The killing in the bible haha what a great book! good way to live your life!

    And the morals? kill for working on sundays!

    Niiice!!

  • So would you bet your life on the word of the bible and reject medicines designed by virologists based on our evolved immune system that has common links with other animals with which we test those drugs, in favour of betting your life on prayer and your god helping you when you need it most?

    It is an easy choice, go to a church instead of a hospital.

    In my time of need I went straight to hospital and hoped the skill of a doctor could save my hand. He did, no church required.

  • Kent Hovind made a lot of money due to people like you believing the crap he was peddling simply because he wrapped it in religion.

    Its one of the great money spinners! No evidence required as people will believe anyway!

    It's just a business! Hovind made a fortune doing it simple.

    And when scientists try to test these miricles ets, GOD just doesn't feel like playing that day, there is allways some lame excuse for god!

  • Hahahahahaha! And when I think you couldn't be any sillier.

  • what does it feel like being trapped in a box(or a book) full of lies?

    at the end of the day you know what you believe in is false yet you can't admit it to yourself.

  • You are more sure of a 2000 year old archaic text than biochemistry, genetic science, DNA, radiometric dating, the Standard Model, Quantum mechanics, evidence of retroviruses, nuclear fusion, nuclear fission, strong nuclear force, electro-weak force, gravity, the expansion of the universe, the speed of light, the fossil record, fossil fuels, the sun burning, the stars burning and all the competent scientists in the world?

    Because Kent Hovind (the convicted fraudster) sure is!

  • I am sure of this bluecode320 You do not know the Bible Code and you do not understand fulfilled prophecy written thousands of years but before and nations and the people written about existed. That is God's challenge to you. Read the book of Isaiah chapter 44-53.

    You will see things written of the Christ that were to be fulfilled in His first and in His now second coming. Science is not always correct in its conclusions. You will see soon. Isaiah lived 700 BC !

  • And at the moment the world's top physciscts are so confident in the Big Bang theory that they have built the Large Hadron Collider at a cost of 20 years of work and $6 BILLION. The collider will give an idea of what the first few seconds after the Big Bang were like and will help to complete the standard model.

  • pwnt

  • Anyone know the name of this song, by the way? lol. I kinda' like it.

  • Are you crazy?

  • Intellectual freedom is great, indeed its very important to the scientific process, but Expelled has little or nothing to do with that, its an attack on science by creationists because they're upset that their idea which lacks sufficient evidence to warrent scientific merit, is discarded by the vast majority of scientists.

    cont...

  • Obviously you did not see the movie or you did and are ignorant of what is going on in the academic community. "Concensus" is not evidence nor does it mean that all of the questions and answers are known.

    Darwinian Macro Evolution has never been seen and can not be observed or tested. Don't reply with the same dismal answer of common descent of a common ancestor or homologies of all the species. That is conjecture, extrapolation but it is not evidence or good science. PERIOD

  • Well! I am glad you think that stating "PERIOD!" in a loud voice makes your ignorance "factual", but in the real world - you know, the one where Jesus doesn't exist? - it doesn't work that way.

    Evolution is a fact. Live with it. If you refuse to accept science, then please...When the cures for diseases from the study of genomics start to flow, keep out of line for the cures.

    You can have fun dying and going to heaven then anyways, right?!

  • You are wrong. The evidence for evolution is very clear. I am a scientist. In my own research, I find homologous proteins in non-human animals and use them to make inference about proteins involved in human cancer. The relationships between us and the rest of the animal kingdom is blatently obvious to me. It would be easy to refute evolution - a breastfeeding bird, a mammel with a one-way lung system or feathers, rabbit fossils in precambrian strata, the list goes ever on.

  • Yes we have a common DESIGN because we have a common DESIGNER but the species to not cross over into other species. No one is against good medicine and good research that provides relief from human suffering but DME has nothing to do with it.

  • I do not know what "DME" stands for, but I take it you're talking about evolution anyways...

    Ironically for you...Current evolutionary theory is being used in genomics to understand and cure all sorts of ailments.

    So I guess you're not against evolution then after all?

    If you still are - stay out of the line for the cures, please. The rest of us would like to live longer. You can just go to "Heaven". Have fun.

  • I hate it when creationists have absurdly high standards for evolution (which can be satisfied if only they took their hands of their eyes) whilst believing in ridiculous things without even a shred of evidence; mary being impregnated by god, jesus coming back from the dead, man being made from dirt.

  • How did the first life form come about per evolutionary theory? Abiogenesis.

    A fact word for dirt elements coming to life by YOUR ALLOWED MAGIC. Your god is time and chance. Can see it and never observed.

    Not too logical or reasonable to me. I prefer the Living GOD.

  • Evolution is not abiogenesis. Abiogenesis is a highly speculative field. Evolution is not speculative, it is a fact. Once a self-replicating entity exists, then life can evolve. This is what happened, leaving imprints of this process in its wake - imprints which have been studied and which all fit nicely within the evolutionary theory. This has nothing to do with the origin of the prime replicator.

  • Yes self replicating also means variation due to a loss or non use of all of the information. But each major species can only use the information provided. Mutuation nor any other process produce a wholly new superior species. Other wise you see new species (nor variations of one that exists).

    No the Earth and the original species are wearing down due to the laws of thermodynamics. Only Christ can reverse the that and bring back the restoration of the Earth. I wish you life & all the best

  • Wrong. A bacteria in Japan recently evolved a COMPLETELY NEW gene for digesting nylon. Evolution CHANGES genes, so is not restricted by whats already there. "the Earth and the original species are wearing down due to the laws of thermodynamics" - your talking bullshit. What do you mean by information? Technically its measured in bits where 1 bit is needed to half the uncertainty. I don't see how its realted. I have no religion. I'm certain about nothing, but base my beliefs on evidence.

  • Sorry if you are upset. If you are open to listening to a season scientist who is now passed away explain the bianry algorythms of DNA and why it is not simple nor by accident go and Google Dr A. E. Wilder-Smith and see his audio and video libray and listen to the college lecture series. By the way I am not religious either. I have a relationship with God through His Son. He is true to HIS WORD.

    Just be open to the truth and let your real heart and conscious lead you. Be well.

  • Statistics mean absolutely nothing. According to statistical thermodynamics - again - everything is infinitely improbably, but EVERYTHING must eventually exist in a state. DNA is the state of amino acids coming together.

    We are letting our real conscious lead us, and unlike you...We're not willing to lie for a belief. We are honest and scientific. We use facts, not dogma. We wish to educate, you wish to DESTROY.

    You and the ID movement are morally bankrupt.

    Read a science book.

  • We've already explained this to you and explained why you are wrong. Yet you continue to spout your lies.

    What a good Christian you must be.

    Mutation, genetic drift, gene fusion/splitting etc all cause "new information". A mutation BY DEFINITION is having information there now that was not there before, or was there is a different state and has mutated to another state.

    Quit lying, please.

    The only species "wearing down" is...Uhh, the Cheetah, due to inbreeding? Everything else is FINE!

  • Since you want to talk about abiogenesis, I will tell you why its a better explination than postulating a creator. In living things, molecules have affinities for each other. I believe that a compound formed from some of the trillions of molecules on one of the billions of planets in one of the billions of galaxies, in what we call the primordial soup. This molecule had a physical interaction with other components of the primordial soup, in such a way that it catalyses the formation of itself...

  • ...possibly by forming a template of itself. Both of these molecules self-replicated further, will occasional variations due to their lack of specificity. As they proliferated, some variations better at self replicating and evolution takes it from there. There is no MAGIC, as you call it. I have no evidence of this, but unlike your position, it creates complexity from simplicity, without involving something AT LEAST as complex as what it is trying to explain. Where did your god come from?

  • Unproven hypothesis the is unteniable considering chance does not provide information nor the enity that produced the information. Like I said Scoop it is your religion or fig leaves to hide from GOD.

  • There is nothing magic about the chemicals that make up DNA coming together. Like all chemicals, those amino acids have attractions. The fact that they came together is of no surprise. The chances of it happening could be 10 to the trillionth power and it WOULDN'T MATTER because it happened anyways. According to statistical thermodynamics, ANY configuration is infinitely immprobable, but alas, everything MUST exist in a state. DNA is the existence-state of those amino acids coming together.

  • I have read your blather and typical NDE arguements. The obvious is looking in the mirror at you. Believing in DME is an act of the will and your philosophical presuppositions not true science. If you think you're right the debate about Creation and ID should never come up again right? WRONG BECAUSE EVEN THE MOST ARDENT EVOLUTIONIST SEES PURPOSE AND DESIGN IN THE HEAVENS AND THE LIVING SPECIES ON EARTH.

    They are clueless HOWEVER as to how it got there in such grandeur and splendor. Bye!

  • The "debate" is only coming up because creationists are forcing our hands. There is no debate in the scientific community. Evolution is just as true and the Earth going around the Sun. However, creationists are trying to shove their BS in schools, and we can't allow schools to teach ignorance. Our children will grow into adults who are stupid.

    I see no purpose in the Universe nor the Earth. We're merely here. We exist.

    Also, we know how BOTH got here.

    You just don't like the explanation.

  • "I see no purpose in the Universe nor the Earth. We're merely here. We exist.""

    This defines who you are but it is not YOURS to tell what the purpose is but GOD's and you can't reason it but it must be reavealed to you. It is revealed in the Holy Scriptures.

    I understand you do not accept the Bible as Truth but that does not mean it is not true.

    You have not looked at the evidence but it is there. The same GOD who designed Physics, Mathmatics, Gravity and Chemistry made spiritual laws.

  • Until you can prove there is a God, my point remains valid. Since God will never be proven (considering he doesn't exist) and couldn't even if he DID exist, due to the fact that even "God" has claimed it's all on faith...Your "point" will never be valid. Ever.

    I've done plenty of research on both sides, and I used to be a Christian myself. Please do not insult me by claiming I "haven't done research" just because I do not agree with your OPINION on the Universe.

  • I missed the part where my existence was meaningless just because you say so? Existence itself doesn't have a PURPOSE, but that doesn't make it meaningless. We're here now and we find our own meanings in things we like. Things we like are usually things Christian's want to go away...like science!

    On what grounds was I a Christian? Geez, I dunno', the grounds that I professed Jesus as Lord and believed in him? Stupid question.

    What you're implying is that I was a "false convert". How typical.

  • What scientific reason allows you to deny evolutino exactly? I'd love to see it so that I may also be "enlightened". Please, do tell us all. Better yet, write a paper and submit it for peer review. You'd like win a Nobel Prize if you proved evolution to be false. What're you waiting for, hmm?

    How am I typical? I was a Christian, and since I am no longer, you did the typical thing by denying I ever was - something you couldn't POSSIBLY know.

    I was a Christian just as much as you are now.

  • I see the evidence for evolution every day. I am a scientist working in cancer research. Many proteins have been studied in atomic detail in many species. Some of these have cancer-related homologues in humans which have not been so well studied. I can study the homologous process in humans and its role in cancer. Telling me that evolution is false, when I see and use evidence to the contrary on a daily basis, is like telling an electrician that everything he knows about wiring is a lie.

  • What do you define as evolution? Types of cancer cells or similarity in proteins does not prove that one kind of species crossed over into a wholey different species. Macro-evolution is not a fact and it is not happening today nor has it ever happened on planet earth. The extrapolation of homologies only shows us that in our environment for life the Creator used similar designs in harmony with biogenesis of life.

    I accept that by observation and faith.

    Each species has a purposeful design.

  • Evolution by natural selection. Looking at homologous proteins (eg haemaglobin) in say, human, chimpanzee, mouse and chicken. In decreasing order of sequence similarity to human, they go: chimp, mouse, chicken. This is exactly as evolution predicts. The closest homologues are those of creatures that split off from the human path on the phylogenic tree the most recently. The most distance homologues are for species that have been on a path divergent from our own for the longest...

  • "The closest homologues are those of creatures that split off from the human path on the phylogenic tree the most recently."

    When you say "split off" you are making an assumption that has never been seen or observed in the major species groups.

    In other words the fossil records show no such event of gradual change. What came before a chicken or after a chicken that can be proven? This is my problem with these interpretations of homologies that go too far.

    God created each after its kind.

  • The black backed gull and the he