The author of this presentation is not a scientist and jumps to purposefully misleading conclusions. The bias is obvious when the presenter claims that the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) is a political body of the UN when in fact it is a scientific intergovernmental body. There are lots of people these days who want to disbelieve scientists and science because they may have discovered something inconvenient.
Excellent video. I have been looking around youtube for some time now and have yet to find a cogent explanation with the use of graphs and/or statistics supporting the anthropogenic case.
Basically, if the science was strong, they wouldn't be so scared that they have to say, "the debate is over", or label everyone with contradictory evidence as flat earthers or holocaust deniers -- they'd be confident enough to let the science speak for itself.
The author of this presentation is not a scientist and jumps to purposefully misleading conclusions. The bias is obvious when the presenter claims that the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) is a political body of the UN when in fact it is a scientific intergovernmental body. There are lots of people these days who want to disbelieve scientists and science because they may have discovered something inconvenient.
timoey1 7 months ago
@timoey1 The fact that you believe the IPCC is without political influence is laughable.
sensiblebilly 3 weeks ago
Excellent!!
newnoggin2 2 years ago
Excellent video. I have been looking around youtube for some time now and have yet to find a cogent explanation with the use of graphs and/or statistics supporting the anthropogenic case.
ovdtogt 2 years ago
Nicely put together, thanks
Capnwabbit 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Is it all for a theory now shot so full of holes that its supporters are having to suppress free speech to defend it?
creeperreefer 2 years ago 3
Basically, if the science was strong, they wouldn't be so scared that they have to say, "the debate is over", or label everyone with contradictory evidence as flat earthers or holocaust deniers -- they'd be confident enough to let the science speak for itself.
suzydenim 2 years ago