JJ Hill built his railroad without a dime of public money and within 4 years after reaching the pacific, grew exports to the far East to $57 million from $4 million previously. Guess what? Government comes and says that he built an illegal railroad, using Hill as a scapegoat for using public money fraudlently funding subsidised railroads. Now if Hill was allowed to continue his export drive to the far east, Mao wouldn't have killed over 100 million Chinese...
@Standardfrank Are you for real? I am very interested into your claim. Would the added commercial power have allowed them to survive despite the Great leap forward? I am seriously into state crimes by intervention and i would love to have more insights about that one. Thanks.
@Standardfrank The chinese. And perhaps JJH while we're at it. Seeing as how Maoists may or may not have erected trade barriers themselves in this new scenario... You seem to be knowledgeable and i would highly enjoy some sources for myself. :)
@ExquisiteDoom : You may have better use for the searching out the Rothschild financing of Mao's communistic[theft] conviction with the Mao-puppet for the theft of china while laying seige with this commercial direction controlling its money supply this way. While at the same time, laying seige of JJH in the US, alleging criminality and fraud of the JJH's business practises. This way you have your intervention and commercial-battering of China by this collaeral-method.
@ExquisiteDoom : you wrote: 'Rothschilds appear often don't they. :S '= Non Sequitur that does not follow, neither a question = theo-mono=covert-hostility=masqerade. Therefore, 'Are u a Rothshild shill?= Question, Non-Paranoos! But 'Okay....i tend not to trust paranoid speculation....goodbye'=Covert-hostility!!!
btw: [Paranoos=Frenzy~by the root meaning]. Para-noia/synthetic-meaning/artifical/puncode-simulation of the root-word=your artificial-claims, your truth altered!
@Standardfrank You don't think it's a bit passive aggressive to ask someone if he's a shill for something? It's not like i went like "oh you crazy conspiracy nut". I don't dismiss the ideas of rothschild control, but when i didn't let on a single clue about my position and you just make the presumption that there even may be a link between me and the Rothschilds one would have to think you lost your damn mind at that point. As for it being a non-sequitor, no shit, that's irrelevant.
@ExquisiteDoom : eye processed your use of artificial-word-claims correctly. please don't blame me, when truth ain't polite, vacating TRUTH-SUBSTANCE out the word-use through the DEAF-FINISH-ONS/root-word-simulations by the paranoos not paranoid=dead-language-use! Check your DICKT[PHALLUS]SHINE-HAIRY. Good Bye. Thx.
"please don't blame me, when truth ain't polite, "
You don't just ask people if they're shills you bloody retard. What am i going to say " Oh yes i am!" Get real.
I don't care if you choose to obfuscate the meaning of paranoia, you know what it is commonly used for, if redefining it suits your lunatic mind fine, but that's not reality.
because capitalism would have flourished giving Mao no avenue to vent his Marxist ideals. Now look what's happened...China has now gripped the US in between a hard rock and a hard plate, holding the US to ransom economically...arrogant parasitic politicians never learn and sadly neither do their ignorant public!
JJ Hill built his railroad without a dime of public money and within 4 years after reaching the pacific, grew exports to the far East to $57 million from $4 million previously. Guess what? Government comes and says that he built an illegal railroad, using Hill as a scapegoat for using public money fraudlently funding subsidised railroads. Now if Hill was allowed to continue his export drive to the far east, Mao wouldn't have killed over 100 million Chinese...
Standardfrank 3 years ago
@Standardfrank
Would you please send me or write me some info about J J HILL?
You seem very educated about him
PeaceLoveIslam 2 years ago
Eye'll send you something to your inbox within 48 hours!
Standardfrank 2 years ago
@Standardfrank Are you for real? I am very interested into your claim. Would the added commercial power have allowed them to survive despite the Great leap forward? I am seriously into state crimes by intervention and i would love to have more insights about that one. Thanks.
ExquisiteDoom 1 year ago
@ExquisiteDoom Allowed who to survive? JJH or the Chinese?
Standardfrank 1 year ago
@Standardfrank The chinese. And perhaps JJH while we're at it. Seeing as how Maoists may or may not have erected trade barriers themselves in this new scenario... You seem to be knowledgeable and i would highly enjoy some sources for myself. :)
ExquisiteDoom 1 year ago
@ExquisiteDoom : You may have better use for the searching out the Rothschild financing of Mao's communistic[theft] conviction with the Mao-puppet for the theft of china while laying seige with this commercial direction controlling its money supply this way. While at the same time, laying seige of JJH in the US, alleging criminality and fraud of the JJH's business practises. This way you have your intervention and commercial-battering of China by this collaeral-method.
Standardfrank 1 year ago
@Standardfrank Rothschilds appear often don't they. :S
ExquisiteDoom 1 year ago
@ExquisiteDoom : Are u a Rothschild shill?
Standardfrank 1 year ago
@Standardfrank Okay, i guess you're a paranoid individual, i tend not to trust paranoid speculation. So, goodbye.
ExquisiteDoom 1 year ago
@ExquisiteDoom : you wrote: 'Rothschilds appear often don't they. :S '= Non Sequitur that does not follow, neither a question = theo-mono=covert-hostility=masqerade. Therefore, 'Are u a Rothshild shill?= Question, Non-Paranoos! But 'Okay....i tend not to trust paranoid speculation....goodbye'=Covert-hostility!!!
btw: [Paranoos=Frenzy~by the root meaning]. Para-noia/synthetic-meaning/artifical/puncode-simulation of the root-word=your artificial-claims, your truth altered!
Good Bye, also.
Standardfrank 1 year ago
@Standardfrank You don't think it's a bit passive aggressive to ask someone if he's a shill for something? It's not like i went like "oh you crazy conspiracy nut". I don't dismiss the ideas of rothschild control, but when i didn't let on a single clue about my position and you just make the presumption that there even may be a link between me and the Rothschilds one would have to think you lost your damn mind at that point. As for it being a non-sequitor, no shit, that's irrelevant.
ExquisiteDoom 1 year ago
@ExquisiteDoom : eye processed your use of artificial-word-claims correctly. please don't blame me, when truth ain't polite, vacating TRUTH-SUBSTANCE out the word-use through the DEAF-FINISH-ONS/root-word-simulations by the paranoos not paranoid=dead-language-use! Check your DICKT[PHALLUS]SHINE-HAIRY. Good Bye. Thx.
Standardfrank 1 year ago
@Standardfrank Wow, clarity isn't your main asset.
"please don't blame me, when truth ain't polite, "
You don't just ask people if they're shills you bloody retard. What am i going to say " Oh yes i am!" Get real.
I don't care if you choose to obfuscate the meaning of paranoia, you know what it is commonly used for, if redefining it suits your lunatic mind fine, but that's not reality.
Learn to live in society will you?
ExquisiteDoom 1 year ago
because capitalism would have flourished giving Mao no avenue to vent his Marxist ideals. Now look what's happened...China has now gripped the US in between a hard rock and a hard plate, holding the US to ransom economically...arrogant parasitic politicians never learn and sadly neither do their ignorant public!
Standardfrank 3 years ago