Added: 5 years ago
From: truebluestar
Views: 17,233
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (61)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Has anyone actually read the military expert's theory of how all that was done? S/he says it was probably a combination of controlled demolition (CD) and then a directed hydrogen bomb that turns everything to nearly dust. First CD for the joints, then nuke to weaken everything fast. And what about the part of North Tower core that remains standing after the collapse and then turns into DUST?! Kerosene fire? Yeah right. That's nukes.

  • I came here expecting an educational video on the tower's collapse, left here disappointed.

  • This is another video claiming that the concrete dust could only come from high explosives. If that's the case, then they would have to be deployed evenly through the entire building as no 'slabs' were found.

    So, how many pounds of what type of explosives are needed to gasify one ton of concrete? If you're going to make outrageous claims, at least quantify the variables.

    Does anyone know the PSI of the concrete? I can only find that it was 'light weight' for the floors.

  • I won't get in2 technical details. The only important question is WHY. Until I see a legitimate post by the makers of this video on the motives our shadow leaders had for doing this, this video will remain as irrelevant as my friend's video of a parrot talking. (& not near as entertaining) Occam's Razor: 19 men got into the country, laid low, found holes in the system and exploited it in committing a horrific act of terror 4 their cause. This theory isn't worth the time it takes 2 watch the vid.

  • Don't get too caught up arguing over the technical details. I saw 3 buildings free-fall to the ground. And one of them did not have the excuse of a plane hitting it. People that believe the official storey are too far gone to worry about. Trust your mind and don't let the system and it's morons make you second guess yourself.

  • It was a demolition nuke in the basement, not thermite.

  • ...something turned all that concrete to dust, and it wasn't fire. You can see the concrete turning to dust before even hitting the ground.  I've heard "Demolition nuke" and/ or "DEW" Direct Energy Weapon. ...You may be right.

  • strange video... you do know that the core was hit by the plane and the core is what kept this thing standing?

  • 9 months before 9-11 there were crews working on a internal elevator,one month before 9-11 there were insurace policies for terrorist attacs,one week before 911 they called on fema to practice evacuation.fema arrived on monday 9-10???

  • nuclear, THERMO-nuclear explosions in the basement? RDX? nanothermite? RDX puffs ABOVE the line of buckling, AFTER the fall began? some sort of super secret SILENT fusion nuke going off? silent RDX? nanothermite, thats an explosive.. but burns slow like thermate? but is also silent. there is video of the buckling, there is video of the inner core standing. the only people delighted are the men who carried this out seeing thier goals still being obtained by civilians. its.. sick.

  • HAHAHAHahahahahhaha.. oh goodness.. every single conspiracy video usually just angers me, out of disrespect for the dead.. but this one made my day. goodness.

  • @carpetmonk

    You said that "every single conspiracy video usually just angers me, out of disrespect for the dead". I hear this objection often from brainwashed sheeple, who swallow the official conspiracy theory hook-line-and-sinker, but none of them has ever been able to explain to me how searching for the real killers is "disrespectful". If I were murdered, my soul would be delighted to see those still living searching for the real bad guys.

  • @carpetmonk because of people like you, this country is due for a rude awakenin.

  • @andrew09211 see you on the front lines. (show up when the t.v. looky box and interwebs dont work anymore) in the mean time.. try something called 'physics'.

  • Multiple problems with the demolition theory, the explosives would have been detonated from the bottom up, and the explosives would have went off not even a second after each other. /watch?v=qk06ax1SRIM&feature=r­elated Another thing is the fires would have set off the explosives, leading to a premature detonation and would have brought the building down sooner. Plus with the damage already done, only a fraction of explosives would have been needed, gravity would have taken over. Simple physics.

  • @Waroftheworlds112 Detination of a demolition can start where ever they want it too. This demolition was done backwards to the classic demolition (WTC 7). Exploded from the top rather than imploded from the bottom. depends what type of explosives was used. Natural (gravity) collapses follow the path of least resistance. Which is NOT though itself. Gravity could not do this, especially at near free-fall speed. It takes precision to bring buildings down like this. Who taught you physics?

  • @mikee999 I am very interested in your theory, what credentials do you have? Engineer maybe?

  • I idea that pre-9/11 airport security was a 'joke' is ignorant, dismissive, and not true. Not only that; even pre-9/11 the airspace over DC was the most protected on Earth.

    The biggest reason why I don't believe the OGS, is because of of the inconsistancies and the dismissive attitued toward those inconsistancies.

  • The drop anomaly is simply explained by the fact the the tower leaned south as the collapse began, all the squibs show in this video imply that they were caused by explosives, and that is simply not the case, and why would explosives need to be planted above the impact zone? If each floor below was completely disabled by explosives, the why would explosives need to be planted about the impact zone? Would that give away more evidence. I think they would have taken that into account.

  • All of you stop! You again go to other points, it is this video and i want to hear debate about this video!!! There are plenty of videos NORAD stand downs and you can move to there. This is about towers and clear evidence of explosives used. Most amazing part is the big dust cloud bursted higher than tower it-self. I rember that gravity existed in that day and something had to push this dust cloud so high up. I can allready predict some idiot saying its air pressure...

  • @2010Clicker Don't you think it would be ignorant to think that the only people capable of executing a sophisticated attack or operation like 9/11 is our own (ala the Government)? Is it THAT hard to believe that there are other intelligent civilizations out there that breed educated criminals or terrorists? Can you skip past the Arab stereotypes and imagine what a highly professional and organized group of fundamentalists like Al-Qaeda are capable of? Probably not.

  • The was a huge mistake by the iluminati , they really were tryng to finger feed people , they never tough that theres actually really smart people all over the world, not just them.

  • I'm an architect, and I live in europe, and I could put forward all kinds of arguments as to why 9/11 was an inside job, but frankly I'm tired of having the same arguments with people on youtube only to have them deliberately misinterprate what I say and re-frame it. The truth is; in Europe EVERYONE who actually gives a shit about 9/11 would not even entertain the idea that 9/11 wasn't an inside job. All those in america who believe the official government line; YOU'RE ON YOUR OWN.

  • All this 911 conspiracy bullshit is a gimmick to sell DVDs, books and buy tickets to speech tours. Go to that website posted in this video's description, right on the front page they ask you to order a DVD, only $20!!! LOL, we shit, if they get 5,000 morons to order a DVD, that's $100,000 right there! These so called "truthers" don't realize they're just buying into another sales pitch; hook, line and sinker. Take everything out of context, put a different spin on it and you've got conspiracy.

  • @merlin5x5 You can ask all your manipulative questions, god knows you have lists of them, since this is your job. In the face of all that is known and more and more evidence such as this, it just looks like pathetic attempts to save a sinking ship. A normal human being would see this and say something along the lines of "Wow, that does seem pretty suspicious" or "It does have some credibility to it". Your inability to even react rationally to good evidence decries your agenda and your lies.

  • how can people still be in denial about bush not planning this

    if they see this video?

    i just dont understand -.-

  • @doughnutman777 what about clinton in 93? what was his part?

  • @doughnutman777 Not Bush. Stop looking for a single scapegoat. There are a whole group of people that plan this stuff, but feed off your desire for a single simple solution. It's the collection of world elite through their influence on the CIA, Mossad who also own the media and the major corporations. They want for them, they want from you. That's as simple answer as you can get, the rest of up to you to research.

  • maybe it was a "kill switch" put into the towers when they were built and maintained throughout their life.... they may have had to push the button thinking the towers were going to tip and destroy many other structures... at any rate WE will never know the true... as we will never know the true about the 4th plane and how it could have been shot down...

  • well, if it did end up being a conspiracy, then its possible that the US paid money to people for some terrorists to crash planes into the WTC.

    but i think that would be a lot of damage. dunno. but i dont think religion is bad, just war over it is stupid.

  • VeryVeryBadWolf, your right about how it takes months to plant explosives. But what i cant understand is how they managed to make WTC BUILDING SEVEN collapse in the same day as the towers....

    If it wasnt all planned???

    If WTC 1 + 2 collapsed the way US Government claims, how come WTC7 came down exactly the same in the same day? And it was demolished (WTC7) the owner of the complex admitted it ( larry silverstein).

  • there are photos from another angle that show the building on fire with a tear right through it dont know if this is proof for critical damage or not but check them out

  • There is no such thing as "critical damage". Buildings don't work like that. They either support the weight or they fail. Don't bring up fire. Heated steel does lose strength, but not all of it. The building would have sagged down to the next floor, but it wouldn't have even done that, the unaffected columns would have supported the heated columns until the cooled, and as the fire moved to burn new stuff, the old areas would cool and regain their strength.

  • ok if there was explosives in it then who put them there?

  • It stands to reason that it was someone with access for several months, at least. Wasn't the President's brother's company in charge of security? Google Marvin Bush.

  • i have a question. what is a conspiricy?

  • A conspiracy is two or more people planning to do something illegal. The most outrageous conspiracy theory having to do with 9/11 is the official government conspiracy theory. Imagine 19 Arabs conspire to overcome the most secure air defense system on earth using nothing but box cutters. Sounds pretty sketchy to me.

  • yea. YEA ur right. hmmmm. i never really thought about it like that

  • a man of 57 should know that flying in a plane before the attack was like taking a bus, very low security. 19 Arabs training in America for years for the attack and also training to blend into the society is more legitimate than the governent ruining its own country for oil that can be found in America itself, also keep in mind that the attackers were jihadists, saying that god wanted to attack and killing the enemy was the greatest way to paradise.

  • also, the impact of the plane was plenty enough to loosen the transmission tower and the inside of the tower collapsing from heat would create sparks and gusts of smoke from the windows. and also i didn't notice this comment was 2 years old lol, sry

  • why waste time training for years? just kill the pilots on the plane on the flight to america. plane crashes, people die, success for the imaginary god and people ignorant enough to believe in that ancient nonsense

  • @truebluestar How did this thermite surive the Boeing 767 crash, and an HOUR of high temp fires? THEN start collapse at the impact floors? LOL Can you show thermite cutting ANY STEEL beam, Vertically positioned, anywhere? Because I can show several attempts by truthers that failed to do exactly that. Would it NOT be BASIC to demonstrate THERMITE cutting thru vertical steel to bolster these claims? The ingredients are cheap, and scrap steel is plentiful. Good Luck.
  • @truebluestar all true! Sketchy like hell. 911 was done on purpose by Silverstein!

  • @truebluestar "Most secure air defense system on earth".. What the fuck are you talking about? Do you remember flying pre-911? Airport security was a JOKE. You could bring pocket knives onboard in some airports. What exactly is an "air defense system" anyway? And what does hijacking a commercial jet have to do with it? You have got to be the most irrational and idiotic person I've encountered on Youtube. Please, jump off a 30 story building for the benefit of society.

  • @SexSteakSoda The air defense system I'm referring to is the United States military. You may remember that direct command had been taken over by Dick Cheney months prior to 9/11. Although we hear many excuses, the fact remains that four airliners were reported as hijacked for more than an hour and NO air defenses were scrambled. Standard operating procedure and years of history dictate that fighters should have been on the scene in minutes. How did 19 people manage to ground our defenses?

  • @truebluestar Its easy for you to sit there and complain about the Air Defense System failures, but you don't understand the complexity of this attack and what the true purpose of NORAD is. At the time (of course its changed now) NORAD was in place to defend the USA and Canada against foreign enemies. There was no plan to defend the country against suicidal hijackers. Onces the buildings were hit, fighter jets were deployed. But it was unclear before then.

  • @SexSteakSoda i understand where your coming from every one makes mistakes but to dismiss the idea america had not planned at all for jet liners to be used as missles into building is a bit unfair, as in the year 2000 the pentagon had a model built with a plane in the middle of it practising what they would do if that exact event happend on 9/11, who ever was ment to prevent or respond could have made mistakes but dont lie and say america never new it could happen, they practised for it.

  • @trevpickering Of course the Government knew it was possible, that it could happen. Just like Pearl Harbor, they knew an attack from one of the Axis powers during WWII was highly likely, they just didn't know where and when. All I'm saying is the Feds did NOT plan and execute a terrorist attack on the United States. The payout was too small for the risk factor. The President and his Administration were already rich, they didn't need to plot 9/11 to make money. That's just a damn joke.

  • @SexSteakSoda and we have Bill Clinton to thank for that....he was the one who cut military spending, then used it to buy some prostitutes

  • @MrAtomicBond You are a fucking idiot. Do some research. First of all when Bill Clinton was in office there was no war. We were at peace. Second, he ran this country better than both Bush Sr and Jr. When Clinton was in office, everyone had jobs, houses were affordable, gas was cheap, the dollar was powerful and wealth was achievable. Now look at what happened after 8 years of George W Bush. He raged two wars while cutting taxes and we have nothing but economic depression to show for it.

  • @SexSteakSoda

    OMG, He's not talking about airport security you absolute Mind LOLOL

    He's talking about military air defense. Wow. You have got to be the most irrational and idiotic person I've encountered on Youtube. Please clone your single brain cell a few billion times and then you can start eating dinner at the big kids table.

  • and the power downs, shifting people around, to vacant offices, plenty of time to throw it together the weeks before the attack. it's an UNcontrolled-demolition, a first of it's kind. is the real question who put the explosives there and how? or is there irrefutable evidence all over that these towers were blown up (and out)?

  • @truebluestar

    google "Kroll"

    they managed security, and check out thier connection to the Blackstone Group, AIG, and Marsh. American airline put options along side Marsh put options.......

  • @cancanbiker

    Marvin Bush was on the board of directors for a company called Securacom conducting security updates to the towers installing new cameras and so forth. This allowed them to access the elevator shafts. He is also former director of HCC Insurance Holdings which had partial account for insurance to WTC complex and surrounding buildings....

  • And the core was the key to destruction. People act like 50,000 people that worked at the WTC would have seen this but the majority of the buildings were the massive steel cores and not office space, which only security crews like Kroll or people like Marvin Bush and that whole can of worms would of known what was going on.

  • @truebluestar The Presidnet's brother was NOT incharge of security at the WTC. That's a common misconception. Marvin wasn't incharge of anything, he was just a shareholder in Securacom aka Stratesec, which is a private security firm hired by United Airlines at Dulles International Airport where one of the planes came from. They were only incharge of the United hub, not the entire airport either. The WTC was an International Trade Center, NYC Port Police were incharge of perimiter security.

  • @pistonsrock99 people that work for the goverment. it's sounds stupid when i say it, but it's true. CIA AND FBI + goverment = illuminati

  • You should be happy that someone took the time to answer your stupid questions LOL

  • i DO beleve that this was a conspirisy!

    but that was rediculous!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more