Dennis Prager & Arianna Huffington debate Politics (1 of 4)

[andyz0007]

Fast forward to 2011, her position on global warming is shot to hell.

[weseyedwalk]

maybe God used evolution to create life

[SilverFox466]

What is great - Dennis shut her down. The insertion did work. In fact in worked so well Obama copied the play of Bush in Afghanistan. The left are wrong on every main issue of today, except when they copy what the right would do. And then they claim credit for others ideas. The problem is the left have such a skewed view of reality that they claim that the rights view is skewed.

[BelfastAtheist]

@Chelsea4President

Fuck off.

[Chelsea4President]

@BelfastAtheist That's the BEST you've got? Go on praying to your Guru Palin. Dumb loves dumber. Keep paying your "stupid tax" and support Uncle Rupie and his empire.

The rest of us "elitists" aren't dumb enough to play the game. They really did a number on you. Not my problem, YOURS entirely!

[BelfastAtheist]

@Chelsea4President

Do you even know what 'Guru' means?

You obviously don't, so I'll fetch you the official definition..

Web definitions for guru: a Hindu or Buddhist religious leader and spiritual teacher.

Anyways, I'm thoroughly against the Murdoch empire and their 'War on journalism' as it's rightfully now known, despite it being the most trusted and watched TV 'News' station in America.

But yes, you seem like a total and utter fatuous buffoon..so let's just end this.

[ShishirYerramilli]

@BelfastAtheist Yes best to stick to "objective" and "fair minded" journalists on the other networks who pretty gave a blowjob to Barack Obama in the 2008 election cycle.Fox Newsis regarded by Americans as being the most professional which gave voice to both sides.If you cant see the vulgar bias and shoddy professionalism in the mainstream media then even Dawkins/Darwin/Hitchens or whatever sorryass pseudo intellectual you atheists worship these days cant help you!

[MofromIWM]

@ShishirYerramilli how can Fox News be regarded by Americans as being the most professional, when only the liberal pundits are shouted down by the big three o'reilly, hannity, and beck. Darwin was a father of evolutionary biology, Richard Dawkins was an evolutionary biologist. and christopher hitchens is a journalist to lump the three together is really moronic, you do know Darwin has been dead since 1882, right?

[ShishirYerramilli]

@MofromIWM Your post in utterly nonsensical ! I already explained why Fox News is regarded more objective especially during 2008 election(where the mainstream media pretty much sold its soul to elect an incompetent ,unexperienced, far left ideologue).This is acknolwledged by the American people(who ended up voting for Obama!)

It doesnt matter whoexactly Darwin ,Dawkins and Hitchens are or whether they are alive or dead(another idiotic argyment by you) .Fact is that most athiests look upto them!

[ShishirYerramilli]

@MofromIWM I just realized that your post is even stupider than I previously thought! Darwin was a father of evolutionary biology, .. Dawkins was an evolutionary biologist....hitchens is a journalist to lump the three together is really moronic" WTF?!How is lumping an evolutionary biologist and the father of evolutionary biology along with a Hitchens who agrees with both of them moronic?! Do you even think before you spew your gibberish?

[ShishirYerramilli]

@BelfastAtheist Oh BTW CNN (no doubt a network you admire) ran a "fact check" on an SNL skit which showed its messiah Obama in a poor light!LOL!Yes, keep believing you are objective and fairminded if it helps you sleep at night

[BelfastAtheist]

@ShishirYerramilli

I don't care if CNN had some negative spin on Obama, I'm not a Democrat, I'm a Socialist.

Now please, leave me alone.

[sinkablehail]

@BelfastAtheist How exactly can one support an ideology that has inflicted so much harm and destroyed so many individuals?

[BelfastAtheist]

@sinkablehail

There's *so* many logical fallacies and erroneous information in your two Sentences alone I might be here all night.. - I'll bullet-point it.

1) The ''Ideaology'' killed nobody, *Stalin* and his thugs killed and brutalized the USSR - he would have done it regardless - to argue against an ideaology because adherents to it commited wicked actions is a logical fallacy - I could use the same vacuous argument against Christianity, or indeed so-called ''Capitalism''.

[BelfastAtheist]

@BelfastAtheist

6).. the U.S.S.R was Socialistic, they did this so that people would assosiate ''Socialism'' with State brutality (Which the U.S was of course committed elsewhere in the World at the time) - and so as to prevent Socialism being discussed about as a potential Political inititiave, much in the same fashion O'Reilly does now, except it's become (in most cases) too dangerous to interchangably use the word ''Socialist'' with ''Communist''

They were right, people (u) did belive it.

[sinkablehail]

@BelfastAtheist - Yes he brutalized people based on the idology of socialism and to enforce the ideology put forth by the mad man Marx - who was really a swell dude.

[BelfastAtheist]

@sinkablehail

Jesus, I really wasted my time here didn't I? You didn't listen to a single thing I said, hell - you didn't even try.

Fuck you if you're not going to pay attention to my comments, don't bother me again, AGAIN.

[BelfastAtheist]

@sinkablehail

2) Socialism denotes a very broad range of ideas, I would ask you to specify which sort of Socialism you think Stalin practiced - though the fact that you think he was a Socialist in *any* way proves to me you couldn't answer the question if I posed it.

3)Socialism at a minimum advocates Worker Control of Industry, anything without that model can't be called Socialistic and in the USSR, the Workers were basically slaves.

[BelfastAtheist]

@sinkablehail

4) Stalin went against virtually every element of what Socialism is about.

5) The only 2 Countries that called the USSR 'Socialist' were the U.S and the U.S.S.R - the U.S.S.R did so to conjure up images of ''Utopian Socialism'' and to capitalise on the moral appeal that Socialism held to many Millions of Russians..

6) The U.S did so for opposite propaganda reasons, namely to try to discredit Socialism - because they believed their Country was foolish enough to believe that..

[BelfastAtheist]

@sinkablehail

Please, don't bother me again.

Goodnight.

[DjBobbyLosAngeles]

two hacks here then

[BarzOnTheWindow1]

"Just because an OPINION is widely held, is no evidence WHATSOEVER that it is not COMPLETELY absurd!" My own view, via Bertrand Russel on evolution

[MURDERORMARIJUANA]

She is the epitome of stupidity for her to say that Deists (someone who believes in a creator but disavows religion) are unintelligent or idiots. Here are just a few of the people she is calling stupid: Dr. Antony Flew, Benjamin Franklin, James Madison, Adam Smith, Voltaire, Thomas Paine, Plato, Aristotle, Nicola Tesla and other intelligent Deists who are far smarter than she is. Just because someone believes in a creator does not make them religious, stupid or ignorant.

[tedlicious]

@MURDERORMARIJUANA You have made a very powerful point! Well-done.

[MURDERORMARIJUANA]

@tedlicious , thank you. I'm not a conservative or liberal, what I am is tired of these extreme fringes on both sides tearing this country apart. the Christian right that's marketing itself under the intelligent design banner needs to just come out and tell the world what they're really about which is promoting religion and forcing their viewpoint on everyone, Deists never try and force the fact that they believe in a creator on anyone. there are greater problems in this world.

[KinglyNumbaOne]

Arianna Huffington is a caricature of herself. When liberals say that conservatives don't agree with facts and science, what they really mean is that conservatives don't believe liberal opinions and pseudo-science.

Darwin has been disproved by anyone willing to crack open a book not written by Hawkins, and global warming has been disproved by so many scientists, and is further belied by scientists caught cooking the books (which the mainstream media decidedly buried).

Liberals make me laugh...

[aussieguy2109]

@KinglyNumbaOne Evolution and global warming have so much evidence behind them that it's unbelievable that people still reject these issues.

The details in darwins books have been disprooved, but what do you expect from a book published in the 19th century. The overall concept of evolution has been excepted, even by the vatican. there is undeniable proof.

[KinglyNumbaOne]

@aussieguy2109 It is a shame that you haven't read any of the evidence on the other side of the issue, because if you did, you wouldn't tell me that it is "unbelievable that people still reject these issues."

I think the Left is replete with the anti-intellectuals they claim to have residence exclusively on the Right. Liberals cannot accept that people can intelligently disagree with their pseudo-scientific evolution theory.

[aussieguy2109]

@KinglyNumbaOne I have read the evidence and me along with 99% of scientists see that the evidence is fraudulent. Evolution is a fact, its not debated anymore and p.s. im not a liberal. If you want to know about pseudointellectualism just look at the people who believe in a bronze age texts called the bible and the quaran. Thats pseudointellectual, to look at those works of fiction by an ignorant people and assume hat is how the world works with absolutely no evidence.

[KinglyNumbaOne]

@aussieguy2109

As your reply indicates, you are among the liberals who simply cannot take that intelligent people can not accept your pathetic liberal worldview, which is a shame. There are tons of indescribably bright people with copious doctorate degrees who deny the myth of evolution, yet close-minded liberals like the joke Arianna Huffington act like they are crazy?

Liberals need to learn to accept that ideas can be different from their own.

[aussieguy2109]

@KinglyNumbaOne I'm not a liberal. Can you not read? Open up any science book, read up on the vatican evolution is an established fact, i know this will upset you intelligent design nutcases but its sadly the truth. your going to have to deal with it, it isnt a left right issue. it's simply a fact. P.s. try watching something other then fox news your using 'liberal' to much without even understanding the definition of what a liberal is.

[KinglyNumbaOne]

@aussieguy2109

Your liberal idiocy is boring me...

The most common tactic of liberals, like yourself, is to pretend that they are not liberal and they are SOOOOO moderate to give credence to their daft claims. Evolution is a myth, and you need to read more than the silly works of Richard Dawkins before trying to debate me.

[aussieguy2109]

@KinglyNumbaOne i have a science degree, i have studied evolution. you clearly have not.

[KinglyNumbaOne]

@aussieguy2109

I have a brain. You clearly don't.

[aussieguy2109]

@KinglyNumbaOne you know as much about anatomy as you do about politics and other fields of science. Absolutely nothing.

[KinglyNumbaOne]

@aussieguy2109

If you only knew who you were talking to...

[aussieguy2109]

@KinglyNumbaOne it wouldnt change my mind, i'm judging your ideas. your belief that inspite of all the facts, you still claim evolution is fiction. It's some sort of liberal conspiracy. While people in america believe creationist dribble, the rest of the world including europe, china, russia, australia have all moved on.

[The442nd]

Absolute waste of time. I'd rather pour salt on my canker sores than listen to this fecal matter of a women.

[TheWinepusher]

lmfao, pour salt on ur canker sores XD

-btw u really should put slat on ur canker sores, it helps :D

[dovespin1]

@TheWinepusher LMAO, so true. sometimes people don't know what's good for them, and sometimes it's not gonna feel good haha

[Chuichupachichi]

The irony about the war is that the leftists are the ones whom are incensed over it, while the government infiltrators & central bankers whom cause America to go to wars because the government will need to borrow ridiculous amounts of money at more ridiculously exorbitant interest rates, are the authoritarians who are pushing the leftist's Marxism

That tautology inevitably leads us to the runaround that is the roundabout of Evolution -

[Chuichupachichi]

The individuals within a population that are most fit (identified as those having most offspring) will have the most offspring

[adminwrh]

@Chuichupachichi - I just came across this and I have to beg to differ. This would apply to the members of the animal kingdom that have no conscious control over their reproduction. Human intelligence throws a monkey wrench into evolution and reverses that trend . Those the best at controlling their lot in life tend to control their reproduction more so than the third worlders that haven't quite caught on to this whole civilization thing.

[aussieguy2109]

@adminwrh no it doesnt throw a monkey wrench into evolution. To say somebody living in poverty is unintelligent is ignorant. Also the poor having many children is evolutionary behaviour, to increase their risk of having a child that prospers.

[adminwrh]

@aussieguy2109 - Conscious control over your reproductive habits is a whole lot more intelligent than the accidental births that the poor tend to have. I defy you to find one poor person who ever gave a thought to increasing their odds of getting a smart one and throwing the Trojan back in the nightstand drawer.

Although you may find anecdotal examples to the contrary, on the whole, well-off people are smarter than poor people.

[aussieguy2109]

@adminwrh Alot of wealth is inherited, intelligence is not as inheritable as wealth. An intelligent person born in somalia is going to have an antintellectual environemnt and hence they wont be able to shine like the spoilt westerners who even when borderline retarded can still graduate university.

[adminwrh]

@aussieguy2109 - You prove my point - if examples of intelligence in Somalia were more plentiful than mildly anecdotal, THEY'D be living the high life and I'd be swatting flies out of the corner of my eye.

[aussieguy2109]

@adminwrh Well then how do you explain america's wealth? it certainly wasnt from having an intelligent people. It was more to do with manafacturing weapons, cars and appliances and the cotton industry.

[adminwrh]

@aussieguy2109 - Good question. We are pretty dumb, what with only having 2.5 times the number of Nobel laureates per capita than Australia. I suppose we're made to look a little better by the fact that we have 1/5th the number of researchers per capita. Does this mean that our researchers get 12.5 times the number of Nobel prizes per capita than Australian researchers?

We DO make some bitchin' weapons, I'll give you that, but CARS, APPLIANCES and COTTON?

[aussieguy2109]

@adminwrh It's good that you can recite some exceptions to the general rule. But unfortunately America's population is ignorant, its educations system is the joke of the western world. P.s. In the 1920's when America had a huge economical boost it was due to manafacturing cars and appliances. Cotton was also one of the main crops that made america wealthy, primarily because it was done using cheap slave labor.

[aussieguy2109]

@aussieguy2109 also the fact that you have that many nobel laureates does not mean your people are smart. The avergae Australian is smarter then the average american.

[Chuichupachichi]

Thus, the flea residing at the tip of the dogs continually chased tail, survives like a 50 year old Eagle Scout.... and Rocky through 5 movies

Ms Huffington shouldn't squander such an excellent appearance by having it enshrouded with the most unattractive audible fog from those ludicrous postulations

Her mention of delusions must have been in reference to the 2 handed primate's ancestral bacterial forebearers. They are those

[Chuichupachichi]

whom had descendants that were a long line of fraudulently found "missing links" that are today's human ape's genealogical heritage known as the non ape, "ape-like", uncreated creatures. It seems that whatever degree of human they once possessed, was devolutionarily, incrementally purged until it resulted in today's miraculously oratorical, 2 handed, furless "human-like" apes with uncharacteristically small canine teeth???

You ever try biting off a woman's entire face?

Viva 4 legged whales!

[jvandoli]

He absolutely KILLED her in this debate. --On just about every subject. Sorry, Arianna, you lost. He did some graduate work at Columbia.

[Gerkinstock]

When does she ever win debates? When she's solely debating people sillier than she is?

[huckabelieve]

Ariana Huffington has minimal intelligence. Why is she relevant?

[bbburton]

This war is wrong, and to argue that the surge is working doesn't give the war any legitimacy.

[Patavinity]

I don't see how the establishment of democracy is illegitimate.

[bbburton]

It's illegitimate because it is not being done by and through the will of the people. It is being forced upon them through the force of our military.

[chukmaty]

Yea, like we totally forced them to get rid of rape rooms, the Republican Guard, and no longer allow them to sponsor terror.

Horrible, horrible.

[bbburton]

Now if we could only get rid of idiots like you . . . Who died and made you god? You've drank from the cup of propaganda so long, you've given up the right to think for yourself. You'd rather believe what comes out of your TV than to believe in your own constitution. You want to spread democracy like you want to spread gonera.

[bbburton]

gonorrhea.

[chukmaty]

You forgot to add "go shopping" and "sheeple" to your post, I am disappointed.

[bbburton]

And you forgot to mention "truth" and "freedom" to yours. Typical.

[jhbgaiem]

Ariana Huffington attended Girton College at Cambridge University where in 1971 she was President of the Cambridge Union Society, the third woman to hold the position, and graduated with a BA (later to become an MA in accordance with Cambridge's practice) in economics in 1972.

Prager attended Brooklyn College, majoring in Anthropology and History; he graduated in 1970

[chukmaty]

I am pretty sure that Prager attended Columbia University.

[jhbgaiem]

Sorry, no sign of him at Columbia.

[Gerkinstock]

Yeah, he did.

[sixtiksix]

There is no way Dennis is going to explain anything to her because she knows it all.

[GoldenUSAEagle]

SHE IS A FUCKING PAID OFF GREEK WHORE PERIOD. THIS BITCH SENSORES EVERYTHING YOU WRITE ON HER BULLSHIT POST. YOU ARE NOT ALOUD TO POST FACTS ONLY BULLSHIT PROPAGANDA. Thank you

[edwardvondoom]

That's what I like about people named "GoldenUSAEagle" - you know whatever they post is going to be all class. Of course by "class", I mean "bat shit".

[GoldenUSAEagle]

Thats why I think this world is going to HELL because people care more about Class then Honesty Integrity & Justice. Go spend a week with these Classy FUCKS & you'll see how Classy they are behind the facade, By the way classe means FART in Greek so they're a bunch of FARTS! THE GOOD NEWS FOR ASSHOLES LIKE YOU IS THAT YOU'LL AT LEAST BE MURDERED ROBBED & LIED TO BY PEOPLE WITH CLASS. YOU MAKE FUN OF PEOPLE THAT SAY IT LIKE IT REALLY IS! Now lift up your sleeve to get THE CLASSY PIG FLU VACCINE!

[JeffBeane]

even if this was true, she's still sexy