On 2 February 1989, the first prototype JAS 39-1 crashed on its sixth flight, when attempting to land in Linköping. The accident was filmed in a now famous recording by a crew from Sveriges Television's Aktuellt.[1] The pilot, Lars Rådeström, remained in the tumbling aircraft, and escaped with a fractured elbow and some minor injuries. The crash was the result of pilot-induced oscillation (PIO). Extremely gusty winds were also a contributing factor.
I dunno, that was atrocious. I'd have to call computer problems on that, I mean there's no way a guy who is skilled enough to even be allowed to sit in the cockpit of one of those things (Is it a Eurofighter or a Typhoon?) would be THAT bad.
he was overspeed with no flaps if you look in the video, with a system failure which made his approach very difficult according to the aircraft accident report. he survived with a broken leg and fractured wrist. statement from the pilot," i figured i could set the aircraft down safely, but it just snowballed."
I agree, the pilot seemed to be trying to get the plane land, but in order to eject yourself, you have to pull up two levers on both sides of a seat, it means to let go of a stick which he could not do....i hope he's ok, there is a chance....
This was a test, after 5 hours of high altitude testing, but the computer failed with pilot error in the landing.. Discovery Channel : Destroyed in seconds.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
its not the pilots fault. the eurofighter is a piece of flying shit. it was built to be efficiently aerodynamic, its incredibly unstable and hardly has an airfoil. if it loses engine power, it becomes a rock.
Watch the video again. Tell me what position the plane is in at 19 seconds? Nearly rolled over. What would happen if he ejected when "nearly rolled over"?
What I think you saw was a piece of the left wing. I think he tried to control it, but ejecting is not an "instant" thing. There is a slight delay, blows the canopy off, ejects pilot - etc.
He would not have had time to calculate all the factors in to eject safely.
dont just reply to someone who knows more about this kinda stuff than you.
let me make this easy for your simple mind..
after about 19.5 seconds.. you can see him eject. the 'give-away' is the cloud of smoke that trails in an upward direction and flys to the right, out of the picture.
panictactics you are an absolute pleb, so in future, refrain from replying to comments because as I have just proved, you will only make yourself look even more stupid (i bet you get called stupid alot)... idiot.
Only a dumb shit like you would mistake a piece of debris for an ejector seat.
On 2 February 1989, the first prototype JAS 39-1 crashed on its sixth flight, when attempting to land in Linköping. The accident was filmed in a now famous recording by a crew from Sveriges Television's Aktuellt. The pilot, Lars Rådeström, remained in the tumbling aircraft, and escaped miraculously with just a fractured elbow and a few other minor injuries.
On 2 February 1989, the first prototype JAS 39-1 crashed on its sixth flight, when attempting to land in Linköping. The accident was filmed in a now famous recording by a crew from Sveriges Television's Aktuellt.
The pilot, Lars Rådeström, remained in the tumbling aircraft, and escaped miraculously with just a fractured elbow and a few other minor injuries. The crash was the result of pilot-induced oscillation (PIO). Extremely gusty winds were also a contributing factor.
Yes, but the onboard computer and the pilots manoeuvres were not synchronised with each other so when the pilot pulled the stick the rudder gave too much output than it would normally give, thus causing the plane to swerve up and then down.
The Gripen is a unstable a/c which means it cant fly witohout the computers. It "invertes" the movements from the pilot. The "elephant ears" is working stand alone from eachother and by the help of the computers it tells what to do to keep the a/c flyable. There fore if the pilot tells the compter to turn left, the computer calculates and tells the "elepaant ears" what to do. The movie shown here is a test flight of this new type of steering system and the comp. did some misscalc.
He was lucky he wasnt landing on a highway, Sweden has shelters near highways that can be used as rearming bays. The Grifen needs only 5-6 person to fully equip the aircraft instead of other NATO aircraft that will take more than 12 person
Someone doesn't know what he is talking about, thats a swedish jet (JAS-39 GRIPEN) and the JAS-39 is way younger than the fly-by Wire system, and is actually not one of the first to have that system. The first to have the Fly-by wire system was the F-16. Many plane type's before the JAS-39 has been built with that system. SO BE SURE TO KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT BEFORE POSTING!!!
For 'Greenleader78' - the pilot broke his elbow & had some bruising. Not a fatal accident (the Gripen hasn't yet killed anyone). See 'Accidents and incidents involving the JAS-39 Gripen' in Wikipedia.
As previous comments sais it was a computer failure which caused the small "front wings" to cease working properly and when that happens(which is VERY unursual since there are 2 more backup computers) there isn't much you can do.. The JAS39 is what u call an "unstable by nature" plane which is a 100% dependent of its computers. The wings changes their position several 100 times a second to keep the plane stable so try doing those changes by yourself..
why does it say (a very bad landing...for a pilot) obviously its a pilot who else is it gonna be?! and there is obviously servere winds and thats why he crashed, gettin blown about all over the place.
Looks sloppy and slow, flares too high, left wing stalls and drops, he powers up for go-around (check out the afterburner burning) and its too late, corkscrew roll across the deck ....... sad, hope he got out.
I heard that it's a Typhoon, Guy's were getting used to the fly by wire control's here, it was still under development at the time of this crash, FROM WHAT I HEARD.
The F-16 and F-22 prototypes had similar issues, too: Both had porpoising tendencies in ground-effect. Essentially, now they have computers that fly and stabilize them; The pilots' inputs direct the plane, of course, but the computers maintain stability at all times.
This is a Saab JAS 39 Gripen. This is the 6th flight of the prototype, a failure of the flight contol system caused the crash, Feb 2, 1989. THe pilot Lars Radestrom was unhurt excep for a broken arm. Radestrom crashed a second Gripen on August 18, 1993 during an air show over Stockholm. He survived that one also, this second accident was blamed on "flight control system high amplification"
its a JAS......so no, i doubt hes american, but seeing as ur from the uk, i wouldnt expect anything less then a gay comment like yours about americans
This wasnt a pilot error it was a test flight of SAAB JAS 39 Gripen in Sweden in the erlie 90's. It was a computer malfunction. Until today thertes only been 5 crashes of the plane ever, this one included.
This is taken from wikipedia :)
On 2 February 1989, the first prototype JAS 39-1 crashed on its sixth flight, when attempting to land in Linköping. The accident was filmed in a now famous recording by a crew from Sveriges Television's Aktuellt.[1] The pilot, Lars Rådeström, remained in the tumbling aircraft, and escaped with a fractured elbow and some minor injuries. The crash was the result of pilot-induced oscillation (PIO). Extremely gusty winds were also a contributing factor.
stenhammarledsbo 4 months ago
amazing she didnt blow up
PortlandViper 5 months ago
Shit that was horrible!
sashman3988 5 months ago
I dunno, that was atrocious. I'd have to call computer problems on that, I mean there's no way a guy who is skilled enough to even be allowed to sit in the cockpit of one of those things (Is it a Eurofighter or a Typhoon?) would be THAT bad.
RADIOACTIVEBUNY 7 months ago
Did he die?
ahpuesbru 8 months ago
@ahpuesbru No, he didn't :)
stenhammarledsbo 4 months ago
I don't think it was that bad!! I'm sure a little duct tape will have it flying in no time!!
mredwinb4time 9 months ago
is that a eurofighter?
marechalrommel 10 months ago
@marechalrommel Looks more like the SAAB Gripen... The canards are smaller compared to the Typhoon... O.o
hawktb9 9 months ago
he was overspeed with no flaps if you look in the video, with a system failure which made his approach very difficult according to the aircraft accident report. he survived with a broken leg and fractured wrist. statement from the pilot," i figured i could set the aircraft down safely, but it just snowballed."
kSwiss987 1 year ago 2
Don't worry, just standard procedure.
Ryan92Ex 1 year ago
I agree, the pilot seemed to be trying to get the plane land, but in order to eject yourself, you have to pull up two levers on both sides of a seat, it means to let go of a stick which he could not do....i hope he's ok, there is a chance....
DeniskaFromRussia 1 year ago
@lukeoregan88
dont lol at that! I mean, would you lol if your brother falls of a cliff and dies? NO!
This is not lol.
Anyways, I hope the pilot survived =S
alexnefi 1 year ago
@alexnefi he did :D with a broken leg and an fractured hand
Deltapilot96 1 year ago
@Deltapilot96 yay
alexnefi 1 year ago
I saw a thing on discovery chanel and it turns out that the fly by wire computer had a glitch and the piolt did survive
rocketdog2116 1 year ago
Is any good landing one you can still walk away from?
simpledudeable 1 year ago
@simpledudeable yes
Mushkill666 1 year ago
looks like there was a small possibility that the pilot could have survived, did he? what exactly caused the crash?
TheDeViLlIeR1 1 year ago
@TheDeViLlIeR1 he survived at least :D
Deltapilot96 1 year ago
@Deltapilot96 that's good
TheDeViLlIeR1 1 year ago
shit...
41100sue 1 year ago
I THINK THEY NEED A NEW PLANE OR a GOOD MECHNIC! HAHAHA. HOPE THE PILOT WAS OK
londia2009 1 year ago
not a bad landing an accident
Sidtan33 1 year ago
A tin of polish will sort it out.....
thezorba1 1 year ago 2
Thats not a landing, thats a crash!
MrTRex777 2 years ago
Why didn't the pilot ejaculate from the cockpit?
panictactics 2 years ago
He had his hands full. And probably his pants too. Prototype plane with software issues. And yes it was a Gripen.
sablatnic 2 years ago
you mean, "eject"? haha. no offense =)
airman193 2 years ago
Comment removed
Apollo580 2 years ago
this plane is not light. over 20 t ;-)
the pilot just fucked up
DonnyaLaysen 2 years ago 4
This was a test, after 5 hours of high altitude testing, but the computer failed with pilot error in the landing.. Discovery Channel : Destroyed in seconds.
Biller02 2 years ago
OK man, thought it was an rc plane at first
Kamikaze239 2 years ago
he just wasted that costly gripen? is that a gripen?
markvinas31 2 years ago
yes it is
EDDVHAJ 2 years ago
LOL,
He'd have been 'gripen' his ass cheeks together going through that mess up!!
xoio 2 years ago
@xoio
you made me lol so hard with that comment
mrhaydon 2 years ago
:-D
xoio 2 years ago
it seems so...wat a shame he destroyed it
Luckyman418 2 years ago
That's totally out of control looks like a malfunction of some kind, surely a military pilot could not be that bad?
seantib 2 years ago
hope they were fake missiles or boom!
Wambatkilla 2 years ago
Lo fucking L man thats a fighter jet
Wambatkilla 2 years ago
This looks like every landing I make in MS Flight Sim.
lemonrind 2 years ago 5
ive seen cars roll...but i have never seen anyone roll a plane before...
ploopsy666 2 years ago
the pointy end.
panictactics 2 years ago
Glad to hear he survived. looks like the cockpit snapped off pretty early in the crash. very lucky indeed
TheGodParticle 2 years ago
nah, thats not the cockpit. thats the pointed front of the plane.
DonkeyBonrProduction 2 years ago
He probably lost his deposit :(
drewmutt 2 years ago
That's not a bad landing...
that's a crash.
buybygb 2 years ago
lol not sure if you would call that a landing at all!
boeingace1618 2 years ago
realy bad landing
johannes969 2 years ago
it was a swedish test pilot who flew this prototype of the saab gripen, computers failed and he tried to save the prototype,
twoaxis 2 years ago
..that´s why still humans should fly aircraft, not computers...
tuca999 2 years ago
you're completely right
twoaxis 2 years ago
Yeah of course. And me I'm the US president (Obama is just a cover, so nobody can know I'm the president).
Faucon551237 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
its not the pilots fault. the eurofighter is a piece of flying shit. it was built to be efficiently aerodynamic, its incredibly unstable and hardly has an airfoil. if it loses engine power, it becomes a rock.
paranoidandroid1995 2 years ago
Thanks for this piece of wisdom. Pity it's not a eurofighter.
panictactics 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i have crappy computer screen, can barely see. what is it?
paranoidandroid1995 2 years ago
wow you can see him eject at 0:19. very good timing to eject!!
alstonbarnes 3 years ago
- @ alstonbarnes -
Watch the video again. Tell me what position the plane is in at 19 seconds? Nearly rolled over. What would happen if he ejected when "nearly rolled over"?
What I think you saw was a piece of the left wing. I think he tried to control it, but ejecting is not an "instant" thing. There is a slight delay, blows the canopy off, ejects pilot - etc.
He would not have had time to calculate all the factors in to eject safely.
pmgodfrey 2 years ago 10
He didn't eject. Idiot.
panictactics 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
dont just reply to someone who knows more about this kinda stuff than you.
let me make this easy for your simple mind..
after about 19.5 seconds.. you can see him eject. the 'give-away' is the cloud of smoke that trails in an upward direction and flys to the right, out of the picture.
panictactics you are an absolute pleb, so in future, refrain from replying to comments because as I have just proved, you will only make yourself look even more stupid (i bet you get called stupid alot)... idiot.
alstonbarnes 2 years ago
Only a dumb shit like you would mistake a piece of debris for an ejector seat.
On 2 February 1989, the first prototype JAS 39-1 crashed on its sixth flight, when attempting to land in Linköping. The accident was filmed in a now famous recording by a crew from Sveriges Television's Aktuellt. The pilot, Lars Rådeström, remained in the tumbling aircraft, and escaped miraculously with just a fractured elbow and a few other minor injuries.
-Wikipedia
panictactics 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
haha alstonbarnes just made you look like a loser :D
TrevaBoarder 2 years ago
Good on you.
panictactics 2 years ago
you know what... i think you are right.. initially i thought that it was him ejecting.. but yea i was wrong...
p.s. im sorry for being a penis!! i guess i just wanted to argue to take my mind off all of my university revision.. :)
sorry dude
alstonbarnes 2 years ago 2
Comment removed
artistgmg 3 years ago
Of course the pilot was having some sort of trouble.
SheebMaster 2 years ago
JAS Gripen, glad we chose the F35 instead of that filthy plane from Sweden
musse73nadTage 3 years ago
this is a servo unit control error.
mksck 3 years ago
that should have been a go around...
Ascent613 3 years ago
lol. i agree. was the pilot on crack??
bassdudeWW 3 years ago
LOL from destroyed in seconds...
BuyMEaDriNk43 3 years ago
This happened in the mid 80's. It was the Gripen prototype. The pilot survived.
goose27 3 years ago 3
he did not reduced the thrust that's why he didn't make it..
he must be still a student pilot
davecarlbench 3 years ago
Or:
February 1989
On 2 February 1989, the first prototype JAS 39-1 crashed on its sixth flight, when attempting to land in Linköping. The accident was filmed in a now famous recording by a crew from Sveriges Television's Aktuellt.
The pilot, Lars Rådeström, remained in the tumbling aircraft, and escaped miraculously with just a fractured elbow and a few other minor injuries. The crash was the result of pilot-induced oscillation (PIO). Extremely gusty winds were also a contributing factor.
Firefox90 3 years ago 5
The pilot created a PIO but shouldn't that have been avoided by the on board computers?
rcairpower 3 years ago
Yes, but the onboard computer and the pilots manoeuvres were not synchronised with each other so when the pilot pulled the stick the rudder gave too much output than it would normally give, thus causing the plane to swerve up and then down.
Firefox90 3 years ago
'Pulling the stick' doesn't control rudder, idiot.
panictactics 3 years ago 2
Stick, pedals whatever. I just translated a text from swedish to english.
I've been flying simulators for over 6 years i know that the rudder is controlled by the pedals so there is no reason to call me an idiot.
And by the way, judging from the comments on your account by other youtubers you won't be here so long so sayonara.
Firefox90 3 years ago
For the people that are laughing. I will laugh at you when you die in a plane crash! It will be funny when you are the only one that dies.
thefsxflyer 3 years ago 23
@thefsxflyer
LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL
khalilovH 1 year ago
@thefsxflyer he didn't die he survived with a broken leg and an injured arm
Deltapilot96 1 year ago
@thefsxflyer I'm pretty sure that the pilot didn't die here.
iflyem3535 11 months ago
@thefsxflyer He didn't die! ;)
This was one of the first test flights with Jas 39 Gripen, and I think they got some kind of technical problem that made the plane to act like this.
But the pilot survived and the plane was in very good shape afterwards.
stenhammarledsbo 4 months ago
The plane had flight control malfunction..., the pilot did his best...!:P
Maverickf22flyer 3 years ago 5
nothing to lol about...
this looks bad and it seems flight control failure: one of pilots' worst nightmares.
armanys2003 3 years ago 2
lol!!!!!!!!
Kobeydurham 3 years ago
fake
davecarlbench 3 years ago
how?
thefsxflyer 3 years ago
John McCain is a piece of shit.
zrathore 3 years ago
where did you get that idea, and wtf does that have to do with this?
stlswat20 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
hell yes! Obama 08
flyguy281 3 years ago
At least he rode it out to the fireball stage. Real men don't eject.
panictactics 3 years ago
this is softvare problem with wly-by-wire sistem,causing crash in test flight!!!
ODZADZE 3 years ago
The Gripen is a unstable a/c which means it cant fly witohout the computers. It "invertes" the movements from the pilot. The "elephant ears" is working stand alone from eachother and by the help of the computers it tells what to do to keep the a/c flyable. There fore if the pilot tells the compter to turn left, the computer calculates and tells the "elepaant ears" what to do. The movie shown here is a test flight of this new type of steering system and the comp. did some misscalc.
sas378 3 years ago
what was wrong with it?? why was the jet swinging like that? mechanical problem or what?
SXMAviator1013 3 years ago
DO A BARREL ROLL!
Marky571 3 years ago
FURBIEGURU APPROVES OF THIS MESSAGE
furbieguru 3 years ago
He was lucky he wasnt landing on a highway, Sweden has shelters near highways that can be used as rearming bays. The Grifen needs only 5-6 person to fully equip the aircraft instead of other NATO aircraft that will take more than 12 person
RubenCraninx 3 years ago
is this an eurofighter
kaleunt08 4 years ago
No, its the first flight of the Swedish JAS 39 Gripen.
FlyingSwe 3 years ago 2
TO-> justalilrandom
Someone doesn't know what he is talking about, thats a swedish jet (JAS-39 GRIPEN) and the JAS-39 is way younger than the fly-by Wire system, and is actually not one of the first to have that system. The first to have the Fly-by wire system was the F-16. Many plane type's before the JAS-39 has been built with that system. SO BE SURE TO KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT BEFORE POSTING!!!
Nice evening Everyone.
Steffen8000
Have
Steffen8000 4 years ago
That's not very accurate: the first aircraft was the Vought F-8C Crusader. The Panavia Tornado is fly by wire too and is far youger than the F16.
Senseimatty 4 years ago
That landing could ruin anybody's day :-)
TntColHugo 4 years ago
pwpw malaka
Skastraspunto 4 years ago
For 'Greenleader78' - the pilot broke his elbow & had some bruising. Not a fatal accident (the Gripen hasn't yet killed anyone). See 'Accidents and incidents involving the JAS-39 Gripen' in Wikipedia.
ceristjohn 4 years ago
wow really?
HydroBlast56 4 years ago
this fighter isn't so good now
flugfan10 4 years ago 3
I think he stalled the plane right before the touchdown.
ballistic76 4 years ago
erm no the fly by wire system failed, it was one of the first aircraft to use such technology so there were bugs
justalilrandom 4 years ago
One the other hand, when systems are working properly and you really whanna turn, the manouverability is extreme!
BTW the pilot survived whitout even a scratch
BilldalSWE 4 years ago
As previous comments sais it was a computer failure which caused the small "front wings" to cease working properly and when that happens(which is VERY unursual since there are 2 more backup computers) there isn't much you can do.. The JAS39 is what u call an "unstable by nature" plane which is a 100% dependent of its computers. The wings changes their position several 100 times a second to keep the plane stable so try doing those changes by yourself..
BilldalSWE 4 years ago
pilot induced oscillation blamed for accident. Pilot bought the farm.
greenleader78 4 years ago 2
why does it say (a very bad landing...for a pilot) obviously its a pilot who else is it gonna be?! and there is obviously servere winds and thats why he crashed, gettin blown about all over the place.
costateguise 4 years ago
what an idiot ....
Santiagosony 4 years ago
Yeah, it scissor-kicked in the third lap and the tail-rotor stalled...(you can tell by the discolouration of the pilot's tongue)...
when his primary buffer panel failed and he popped the nollie, he was toast... really too bad, i hope he's okay...
-->That's what the rest of us hear... please shut the fuck up...
9thcannon 4 years ago
swedish jas-39 gripen,prototype in 1989.
it was a test flight and a ''fly by wire''failure
dimitrisdrs 4 years ago
Im afraid to say its a jet so no torque buddy. Prob a control surface failure or system failure. Shame
deeejaychrissyb 4 years ago
Yep that is what i would call a bad landing
schwantz037 4 years ago
Unstable approach.
Looks sloppy and slow, flares too high, left wing stalls and drops, he powers up for go-around (check out the afterburner burning) and its too late, corkscrew roll across the deck ....... sad, hope he got out.
abo944 4 years ago
Yeah, you could call that a bad landing I suppose! Does that engine have a bit of torque or something? Never seen a plane corkscrew like that before!
ccoraxfan 4 years ago
More of an arrival than a landing
keegan773 4 years ago
was any one killded
PaDbass 4 years ago
wow.... thats a Saab grippen and it got its design-malfunctions. the seat ejects sometimes even when you don't pull the handle.
skare91 4 years ago
landing? no. crash? hell yeah :DDD
SirQmmiseta 4 years ago
what are you laughing idiots!!
emiliano8505 4 years ago
lol smooth
weirdo666666 4 years ago
lol, never fly Swedish planes..
uteligger66 4 years ago
I dont think you can call that LANDING. or maybe thats the way they do it in some countries.
iftyshifty 4 years ago
lol ill look into that lol
LtJon25 4 years ago
I'm not certain but, seeing how it was wallowing in the air, I think he was just going too slow for that aircraft.
Mikeishere1st 4 years ago
Thats no Typhoon, its a Grippen, build by Saab. You can see it at the jet intakes.
tilly23 4 years ago
YOU'RE right it is a SAAB JAS-39 Grippen (you can also tell it's one becuase it's single engine the EF-2000 is not)
JNT11593 4 years ago
thats why there is a thing such as GO AROUND dude if you cant fly WALK
aceflyer89 4 years ago
kinda looks like a eurofighter a bit.... im only saying so dont bite my head off if u dnt agree
JohnFerns 4 years ago
I heard that it's a Typhoon, Guy's were getting used to the fly by wire control's here, it was still under development at the time of this crash, FROM WHAT I HEARD.
coastalman226 4 years ago
you could call it a bad crash instead of a bad landing
tescopink 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
lol crappy eurotrash excuse for an f-22
sicchevelle8 4 years ago
Looked like he over-compansated at the last second there. Whooooa hooorsy whoooa!
patana07 4 years ago
I quote: It's not a bad landing, a crash landing!!!
Senseimatty81 4 years ago
holy shit...
dkorda 4 years ago
damn....
cricketinsane 4 years ago
Thats not a bad landing thats a crash landing
:P
Fredamg 4 years ago
well, he survived a spectacular crash..the Swededs probably make their planes like their cars...pretty damned solid.
abelroshni 4 years ago
jas gripen...
addew2 4 years ago
The F-16 and F-22 prototypes had similar issues, too: Both had porpoising tendencies in ground-effect. Essentially, now they have computers that fly and stabilize them; The pilots' inputs direct the plane, of course, but the computers maintain stability at all times.
SenorSpode 4 years ago
DO A BARREL ROLL!!!!!!!!
TonyAirlines 4 years ago
Ooooops!
mrspenn16 4 years ago
This is a Saab JAS 39 Gripen. This is the 6th flight of the prototype, a failure of the flight contol system caused the crash, Feb 2, 1989. THe pilot Lars Radestrom was unhurt excep for a broken arm. Radestrom crashed a second Gripen on August 18, 1993 during an air show over Stockholm. He survived that one also, this second accident was blamed on "flight control system high amplification"
CharlieVictorRomeo 4 years ago 2
the words too much and time spring into mind
ne1 betting tht hes american?
musefeederwolfmother 4 years ago
its a JAS......so no, i doubt hes american, but seeing as ur from the uk, i wouldnt expect anything less then a gay comment like yours about americans
ubcs109 4 years ago
im frm fukin scotland
its only english folk who say there frm uk or britain
musefeederwolfmother 4 years ago
so why does ur profile say ur from the uk
ubcs109 4 years ago
because the geniuses that made up this thingy put it as 1 country which they r not the uk is 4 countrys
musefeederwolfmother 4 years ago
no one qualified to fly a military jet could be that bad, surely. jet's fault I say
tims18 4 years ago
he died...
tobymoua 4 years ago
grippen
mladjo23 4 years ago
do these aitcraft have fly-by-wire because it looked like very bad control surface response. maybe not pilot error??
LONGIRAFFE 4 years ago
kurwa jaka kraksa
Pater260450 4 years ago
o ja pierdole on juz jest dead
Pater260450 4 years ago
no nie, spoko, gosciu nadal zyje... ale pilot z niego to raczej chujowy:P
oskioscar 4 years ago
Its a Saab gripen swedish crash landing.. I think something was wrong
reaverswe 4 years ago
oh fuck. that was terrible to whatch.
i hope the pilots or the pilot is without any hurts!!
FoXakaFoX 4 years ago
OH SHIT I JUST BOUGHT ONE!
JIBB01 4 years ago
OMG!!! :O
eddmaster9 4 years ago
thats pilots fault big time
omarnumba2 4 years ago
This wasnt a pilot error it was a test flight of SAAB JAS 39 Gripen in Sweden in the erlie 90's. It was a computer malfunction. Until today thertes only been 5 crashes of the plane ever, this one included.
joelnorberg 4 years ago
I think this airplane was one Dassault Rafale
guilhermetrancos2007 4 years ago
wasn't it a harrier?
Sahagunense 4 years ago
i liked the part when the airplane flipped LOL!
Secretboy8 4 years ago
Saab viggen???
benash04a 4 years ago
No Jas 39 gripen during a test flight.
Agent0range67 4 years ago
The plane is shit ..dont buy it
trasko666 4 years ago
Thank god you said that!!!, I was