Keith Olbermann DESTROYS Bill O'Reilly...AGAIN!

[macally33]

Kieth always looks like he using his NASA diaper

[beedotgeedot]

"CASE CLOSED!"

lmaooo

[4135555]

Why am I blocked on liberal websites for claiming that I suspect Keith of playing with pet Gerbils while in the green room?

[allmine9]

If you go on Bills show you eaither agree with him or you get told to shut up. And ratings dont mean much except for the fact that fear and fiction sales...i mean look at harry potter that stuffs not true but it sales damn well.

[lexim85]

Just because something like the O'Reilly factor has great ratings does not make it great. The Jersey Shore has great ratings but I am not going to line up to watch that stupid ass show.

[lexim85]

Just because something like the O'Reilly factor has great ratings does not make it great. The Jersey Shore has great ratings but I am not going to line up to watch that stupid ass shows.

[ThaRealGwin]

Bill kills that fat cow Keith Olberman every day of the week including yesterday, next week today and tommorow.

I notice never does O'Reilly address Keith but only the reverse.

[ThaRealGwin]

Bill kills that fat cow Keith Olberman every day of the week including yesterday, next week today and tommorow.

[ruty143sh]

Keith is the fucking man

[purplenurps]

I hate this guy so much

[Bradbssargdons]

i dont see any destroying... typical leftists.....

[cokeandmentos1212]

i dont understand why o reilly has to go to olbermann's show to defend himself....he has nothing to defend, he lied...

[iainlotan]

The incident Bill was talking about must have been this one: Within a few weeks of Malmedy, one U.S. unit had machine-gunned sixty German prisoners to death in a small Belgian village called Chenogne (see “Death at Chenogne”). If you read the book The world's bloodiest history by Joseph Cummins you will see the incident Bill is talking about. The reasoning is believed to be in retaliation to what the SS did at Malmedy. With that being said, Bill should have clarified his mistake.

[iainlotan]

The incident Bill was talking about must have been this one: Within a few weeks of Malmedy, one U.S. unit had machine-gunned sixty German prisoners to death in a small Belgian village called Chenogne (see “Death at Chenogne”). If you read the book The world's bloodiest history by Joseph Cummins you will see the incident Bill is talking about. The reasoning is believed to be in retaliation to what the SS did at Malmedy. With that being said, Bill should have clarified his mistake.

[iainlotan]

@cokeandmentos1212 The incident Bill was talking about must have been this one: Within a few weeks of Malmedy, one U.S. unit had machine-gunned sixty German prisoners to death in a small Belgian village called Chenogne (see “Death at Chenogne”). Read the book The world's bloodiest history by Joseph Cummins to see the incident Bill referenced. The reasoning is believed to be in retaliation to what the SS did at Malmedy. With that being said, Bill should have clarified his mistake.

[vidman7]

Sorry pal, you cant "destroy" someone unless you have them on the show for a verbal debate. Just sit behind your desk and talk. Coward.

[cantizzo07]

@vidman7 yea like on Fixed News, two idiots shouting loudly and getting no where fast. Keith has reporters that support the ideas with facts, not opinion.

[vidman7]

@cantizzo07 I never endorsed Fox news or any other brand. I just want an honest up front debate. Once again, an uninformed lefty making assumptions.

[ragerancher]

@vidman7 Except Bill O'reilly doesn't allow talking. If anyone begins to oppose him or show he is talking crap he just talks over them.

[vidman7]

@ragerancher That's simply a generalazation, and it's not true at all. Back it up.

[ragerancher]

@vidman7 We are here on youtube. Type in Bill O'reilly and look at all the times he has had people on his shows. If you are incapable of doing this yourself I guess I'll have to do it for you, unless of course you are willfully blind and then nothing I show you will convince you.

[vidman7]

@ragerancher Of course youtube will have the obnoxious clips you jackass. Watch his regular nightly show and it's not so flamboyant. Besides, popular majority of people agree that Jeremy Glick is a radical.

[ragerancher]

@vidman7 Youtube also has the clip of O'Reilly lecturing someone who's father died in 9/11 about what to think and threatening him along with general rudeness. It has O'Reilly not understanding the basic principle of percentages, outright lying. If he was a half decent presenter these would not be there. I challenge you to find the same on any major UK news network. You would not find it. Don't just dismiss my examples. The no true scotsman fallacy where you dismiss all "undesirable" evidence.

[vidman7]

@ragerancher The reason everyone finds O'Reilly's very few faults are because his ratings are damn good. He dominates networks, therefore more people are there to see him. British news is boring. Nobody watches it. O'Reilly has spice and flavor. Not everyone is a boring, droned out redcoat like you.

[ragerancher]

@vidman7 I guess you don't find it ironic that you resorted to the same pathetic argument that O'reilly uses himself, ratings and viewing. Number of viewers does not make it good. If you think nobody watches our news then explain why BBC News is widely regarded worldwide as the best and O'reilly has little to no influence outside the USA? Also the role of news is not be exciting, it is to inform. Your "news" is full of intentional lies, misinformation and smear campaigns.

[ragerancher]

@vidman7 Plus your "boring droned out redcoat" statement shows what a pathetic idiot you are. Many Americans like resorting to the war of independence argument whilst most actually don't have a clue what they are talking about, you included. British news may be boring but it is often factually correct, it doesn't intentionally misinform and it tries to be as unbiassed as possible with the presenters not being allowed to skew the point one way or another, something americans don't get.

[shariotoflove]

@vidman7 well you cant have a debate with Billo the clow, hell just shout the whole time!

[MikoDollie]

@vidman7 Of course Olbermann must sit behind his desk. If he goes on O'Reilly's show he'll be shouted down with "SHUT UP", generally be overtalked, or get his mic cut off and asked to leave. O'Reilly doesn't bring guests on to learn he does it to throw his weight around.

[vidman7]

@MikoDollie Haha, way to globalize the situation. Classic leftist. You have seen the 5 or 6 moments when O'Reilly has said "Shut up" or cut their mic. Watch his show nightly and you rarely, rarely see him blow up. Besides, his ratings absolutely kill any other program. He must be doing something right.

[sirdrinksalotable]

Stewie Griffin sayin that bastard bill o'reilly was pretty damn funny lol

[jobe69]

Olbermann is definitely a biased moron that will not have another point of view on his program..At least O'Reilly has both sides of the conversation every night..MSNBC Needs to get with the "Real World" They are a Joke..Maddow,Matthews and This Mook Olbermann..

[DankBombCroosh]

They can't. Liberals two biggest fears are reality and self-responsibility.

[adam241]

@jobe69  lol good one you said O'Reilly has both sides of the conversation every night ur hilarious

[ragerancher]

@jobe69 You're joking right? Bill O'reilly had a guy on his show who's dad got killed on 9/11 and then O'Reilly had the nerve to lecture this guy on what his own dead dad would think of his views.

[babyboi97b]

Why do people dislike Olberman, he is stating the FACTS of another reporter making stupid mistakes. Reporters shouldn't be able to get away with telling lies, they should be called out and thats what Keith does!!!

[mase5701]

I think Olbermann spins alittle off the charts sometimes. (Bill O is way worse, I consider myself a moderate and Oreilly is a right wing deush bag)

However, I believe we need nationalized helathcare, I support progressive issues like same sex marriage and abortion rights. I also consider myself a conservative: limited governent, but human rights are separate from politics and should not be meshed the way our two-party system loves to lump them together)

[blackbearsam]

@babyboi97b People dislike oblberman because hes a douchebag and is mad because his show is shit compared to oreillys. Enough said.

[skitman1944]

Olbermann, wonder if you know just how stupid you sound. Of course not, you are to stupid to know that. Which is wy you are rated so low. Enjoy your ratings Keith, your days are numbered fuckwad. I know where you live and a lot about you Keith. Get ready! Its game time!

[jmkpns]

For someone who hates FNC and calls it Faux, this brainfart sure gives that network alot of his airtime. Ever notice that?

[mase5701]

He should have stuck to sportscenter

[zamboangaVillain]

george soros is that the financial guru??

[Sorrento1969]

And doesn't Glenn Beck's voice sound like Richard Dreyfuss?? I mean I don't want to offend Dreyfuss, but the two share the same voice!!!!! lol

[bella50008]

Olbermann seems like he is on the edge of insanity.

[Sorrento1969]

Recently I became a fan of this Keith Olbermann... makes people who don't have a straight act look funny. I wonder if it's time for O'Reilly to retire, he wasn't this bad years ago... maybe FoxNews has something to do with the mistakes he has made, I think this would explain a lot

[charms71]

@Sorrento1969 same here. keith isnt as evil or mean as i heard.

[DJSNuva1]

You notice how Kieth Olbermann never has anybody on his show that disagrees with him?

[IanLoewen]

exactly.  Olbermann is such an idiot.

[charms71]

@DJSNuva1 same as glen beck lol

[Sorrento1969]

It's difficult to find someone to disagree with you when you use reason, and when your guests are intelligent adults. The one that do have guests disagreeing with him is O'Reilly, and again he is not an intelligent adult who use reason

[DJSNuva1]

The reason that Olbermann doesn't have guests is because he's afraid to be proven wrong.

[Sorrento1969]

Arguments, not repeating theories... can we have something to discuss? Ok, repeating: "it's difficult to find someone who disagrees with you, if you are someone who uses reason and when your guests are intelligent adults". O'Reilly has been in Letterman's show, and his tone is 10 times softer there and never talks about anything radical... I wonder why.

[DJSNuva1]

How do you explain away the fact that Olbermann gets killed by Scooby-Doo n ratings?

[Sorrento1969]

And how do you explain Sponge Bob's does the same to Scooby? Are we grown adults or are we kids fighting to see which cartoon is better??? This discussion is funny

[MrTrieg]

What's funny is is that oreilly gets about three times more viewers than this worthless sack of crap, keep trying though it amuses me

[concujak]

@ MrTrieg

Yes, I agree with your logic !!!

more viewers = facts & truth !!!!

[999ballzout]

hahaha msnbc is so far left but they rape fox every time... if fox is high up in the ratings america is in for a hard time because that means the majority is filled with dumbasses

[gamewizard]

If Olbermann is so great then why are MSNBC's ratings in the dumper and FOX is number 1? Poor, pathetic liberals.

[hitch4645]

because there is more dumb people than intelligent people in this country

[gamewizard]

With the way the education system in this country has been dumbed down, the only difference between someone who is educated and uneducated is that the educated person pays thousands of dollars a year for the privilege of being uneducated. I can't believe some of the rank stupidity that comes out of the mouths of young college graduates these days. Most of them are lucky to be able to write their own names. Is this what you define as intelligent?

[hlev123]

dead on, liberals are fake americans, ill quote south park, "if you don't like america you can giittt ouutttttt"

[hitch4645]

or you can . . . . . i dont know . . . . .try to improve america. and you do know that the guy that said that on south park was portrayed as an uneducated redneck. he stood for all the uneducated dumbfucks like yourself in this country. so defending him just shows your stupidity

[hlev123]

ya but what he said was completely correct. If you don't appreciate this country, which has freed billions of people, and given you the opportunity to be free, then get the fuck out and go to North Korea.

[hitch4645]

why cant you work to improve the country. the whole "love it or leave it" doctine is completely absurd

[hlev123]

thats not true, what liberals think is that they are the only ones that want to improve our country, its the same thing on the other side buddy.

For example, look at the way Reagan basically fixed our country and economy after one of the worst administrations ever seen under Carter.

Now Obama has done a shitty job his first year in office and everyone knows it. If he keeps basically being an all talk president just like Jimmy Carter, a conservative president will try to fix what Obama failed

[hitch4645]

First and foremost, I never said "love it or leave it." I understand that conservatives are trying to improve the country (I just entirely disagree with how to do it).

As for your second point, you don't want to get me started on Reagan. Reagan was probably the worst president in a century (W gave him a run for his money though). He destroyed our economy in the long run, reversed many social achievements we made in the 60's and made the world hate us

[hlev123]

lol he ended the cold war man the only people that didnt like him, why is it that Reagan is widely viewed as one of the best presidents and leaders of the late 1900s?

and dont say he destroyed the economy in the long run, he decreased taxes dramatically, and set it up for great economic times that were enjoyed the next 20 years, including giving Clinton credit that he didnt necessarily deserve.

I would say you might be in the 5% of Americans that think Reagan was a bad president.

[hitch4645]

most knowledgeable non-conservatives know that reagan was a horrible president. first off, just because the cold war ended during reagan's admin does not mean that HE ended the cold war. USSR's economy was already crumbling when he got into office. this is largely due to the policy of detente that was taken by nixon, ford, and carter. now lets go down a list of things reagan screwed up on: sold arms to a terrorist regime in iran, supported Saddam's regime in iraq (and supplied them with weapons)

[hlev123]

AND talk about how inflation, interest rates, and unemployment was at an all time best under reagans administration, and no, he ended the cold war, the world knows he was the genius that the evil communists could be defeated, which they were

[hitch4645]

????????? how did he defeat the communists. do you think that when he said "tear down that wall" that the russians just got scared and gave up? no! hell no!!! that just shows a ton of ignorance on that subject. its not like he just intimidated them, their economy collapsed.

[hlev123]

why dont you answer this then, why is highly regarded as the most popular president of recent years? and even being as a communist that you are you cant deny that fact

[hitch4645]

1. I'd like you to answer my question, how did Reagan defeat the communists? You're giving a statement and not backing it up.

2. I'm not a communist. You probably don't even know what communism really is anyways. I support a mixed market economy just like the rest of the intelligent world. You calling me a communist either shows your stupidity or your total ignorance on the subject.

3. He's only the most popular president in recent years among conservatives. Liberals and many many many . . .

[hitch4645]

. . . moderates despise him. And even if he was "highly regarded as the most popular president of recent years" (which he is not, Clinton has much higher approval ratings than he does) that isnt saying a lot. We havent had a good president in this country for 40 years. Nixon was shit. Ford sucked. Carter was awful. Reagan was dreadful. Bush was bad. Clinton was just so-so, an W was historically terrible.

[hlev123]

Nixon was not shit as a president, foreign policy wise he was one of the best of all time, one slip up and then POOF, and it wasnt that he did it it was the cover up that was the bad part, Ford was not bad at all he didnt suck, carter was awful, reagan was not dreadful his approval ratings were better than clintons if you look at overall consistency, bush wasnt bad at all thats just your liberal homerism. See I am a conservative and I'm willing to give credit to liberal presidents

[hlev123]

such as Johnson who was controversial yet okay, Kennedy, Clinton even though he had naturally good times. W was more controversial than bad but ill give it to you anyway because im not fully for the war and i think the only reason why he was reelected was because the guy he was running against in 04 might of been worse than James Buchanan. However look your liberal Jesus Christ right now, whats he done?

[hitch4645]

no, W wasn't just controversial, he was bad. period. as for my "liberal Jesus Christ"

1. Jesus was liberal, so "liberal Jesus" would just be Jesus

2. not everyone who supported Obama worships him, why do conservatives act like when we support a candidate we're automatically obsessed with hi, its absurd. i didnt even support obama in the dem primary.

3. he hasnt been liberal in office. hes been a moderate on EVERY SINGLE ISSUE. hes moved to the right on EVERY SINGLE ISSUE.

[hitch4645]

supported apartheid South Africa, supported the Mujaheddin and gave funding, training, and weapons to the people who are now killing our soldiers in Afghanistan, fueled a civil war in Nicaragua that killed 50,000 people, supported conflicts in 5 of the 7 Central American countries (and the mass murders that came with them), escalated a failed "war on drugs", over-decreased taxes (especially for the rich), increased the wealth gap between the rich and the poor, decreased the middle class, . . .

[hitch4645]

. . .he deregulated the economy, allowing for companies to move an extreme amount of jobs overseas, this deregulation also was largely responsible for our recent economic collapse, he took our economy from the largest trade surplus to the largest trade deficit in the world, increased our national debt more than any other president in history (%wise). Shall I go on?

[Sportspaz2009]

"For example, look at the way Reagan basically fixed our country and economy after one of the worst administrations ever seen under Carter.

"

if massively increasing the wealth gap between middle class and wealth is your idea of fixing our country, i don't even know what to say.

No doubt, Carter was a terrible president. Reagan was not everything they said he was, at all.

oh, and obama is very conservative, but i doubt you'd know that based on where you probably get your news

[hlev123]

"obama is very conservative"

you lose all credibility with that statement

[Theriot6592]

that just proves that conservatives buy into biased journalism more

[Theriot6592]

i'm sick of these "factor fiction" segments. i agree that oreilly is a douche, but aren't there more important things to cover?

[MildTabascofries]

there isnt much else for him to talk about when Bush is out of office and the election is over.

[11binf9]

Lmao, so here is where the 10 people who ACTUALLY watch Keiths show are! Poor , poor keith, his 20 viewers are cheering him on. Its almost laughable , ok it is laughable, how shitty of a show Olberman has. That must be why his ratings look like Obamas stimulis plan( that means they suck for obots).

[MrBennetzen]

You want to know how Benard Goldberg got fired from CBSNews? Ask Fmr. Nebraska Coach Dr. Tom Osborne.

[ErlendoWH]

Man how I wish this show aired in my country too. :(

[Jennybean89]

Ditto!

[jons44]

Keith is so awesome!

[MePandaBlair]

True that Bill, everyone I feed on the streets is practically an old Vet, liar! Get a heart, get a soul.

[cocobear33]

i agree keith olbermann is a clown and he could never match up to bill oreilly , bill has been number 1 for what like 8 years in a row and keith well he is what he is a loser

[Camdnside]

All this bitch does is prove O'Reilly's point. Maybe this is why nobody gives a damn about "countdown". It's some douche living in his world where he can trash Bill and think he might reply on The Factor so everyone might watch his show. Too bad Bill is bigger then that. He has bigger fish to fry then a sleazy coward.

[FelonyCharges111]

all Olberman ever does is bash O'reilly because that is all he has....its an old trick, go after the famous one to get famous.....but Keith is just makin a fool of himself.......................­and keith never uses anything to thicken his argument......liberal cunt

[jayjelectric]

MSNBC-More Shitty "News", Biased and Corrupt.

[chrisfo19]

keith is smarter than that clown Oi'reilly. Bill go back to the Hamptons and stay there with your ddumb rich buddies and your Thai mail order bride.

[Standup091]

Hey Chisfo19

Keith Olberlann is just a Bill O'Reilly Wanabe. Keith's ratings suck, and you liberals just can't deal with it!

[BenJEMean]

Alot of liberals watch O'reilly to laugh at his bs, have you checked how many complaints they get daily too?

Also O'reillys on primetime for old people and suppertime.

[HokiesAndDawgs]

I guess you'd know all about BS if you watched Keith Olberman. The dude is nothing more than a government propaganda machine because the CEO of GE is tied with MSNBC and will get bailout money through cap and trade.

MSNBC is the closest thing the USA has to the old Soviet Union state run media.

[BenJEMean]

funny you mention that, im in england but i also dont watch any news anchor for the news, i read it.

but still i dont watch keith or bill, but i do however always manage to find clips all over the internet of bill o'riellys crap, if you agree with it you're as bad as him, then after i've watched that video i always see in the related section a reply from keith exposing bill's crap, yes keith is obviously biased and plays the petty game (from what i've seen) but bill without fail, starts it.

[TheAccountnumber1]

you actually scare me. unless you're trolling, in which case, good work.

[HokiesAndDawgs]

Followers of Obama scare me, like yourself. You're a sheep and easily manipulated. You believed in a load of garbage. You watch MSNBC. The epitome of trash. You scare me.

[TheAccountnumber1]

you can't call someone a sheep just because they support the popular candidate. you can believe what you want to believe, even if it's a lie from bill, i can't and don't want to stop you, it's not my right. if you can call someone sheep for liking the more popular person, aren't you a sheep yourself for listening to Bill O'Reilly? after all, you keep boasting about his ratings. your entire entire argument is based on ad populum. And yes, keith is clearly left, but a liar? no

[HokiesAndDawgs]

Obama's popularity is falling fast. 53% approval and a huge number of those that strongly disapprove.

If you don't think Keith Olberman is a liar, then there's no help for you. GE is getting stimulus money if cap and trade goes though. They lie lie lie lie lie lie for Obama.

[TheAccountnumber1]

show me some evidence of keith lying more than bill and i'll gladly join your side

[DiamonteLeingod]

You're listening to a man whose claim to fame is a news station that is blatantly one-sided, never gives sources for its supposed facts, and churns out repetitive bullshit if the president is republican; negativity if he's not.

Why should I believe your argument. No, better yet, why should I even take it seriously?

[HokiesAndDawgs]

When has MSNBC said one bad thing about Obama? When has Keith Olberman said one bad thing about Obama? It's only biased in your ignorant opinion because EVERY OTHER SOURCE IS LIBERAL. Use your brain.

GE owns MSNBC and will get stimulus money if cap and trade is passed. Was Fox News selling Bush action figures the way the NBC store currently is? Your ignorance is hilarious.

[DiamonteLeingod]

No, it's biased because every fucking student of Active Journalism sees that

1) They hardly air their sources

2) The ideals of every anchor, with exception to that idiot, Holmes, are shockingly right-winged

3) Their fucking rate studies even state that the majority of their viewers are republican

4) They hardly deliver news, but constantly air commentary

5) Bill-O has contradicted himself and lied on numerous, humorous occasions.

Also, I could give one shit less what NBC is selling (cont)

[DiamonteLeingod]

The fact is: While Bush was in office, they NEVER even cracked a slight frown on ANYTHING he did... even when he signed the bailout. What other proof do you need, you fucking ignoramus?

[HokiesAndDawgs]

So.....you dodged the question. How typical. Show me where CNN and MSNBC dipshits like Keith Olberman have cracked down on Obama...show me where. Afterall, he has communists in his cabinets, ACORN scandal, and the list goes on. Where are the jobs? Why hasn't MSNBC mentioned that?

What other proof do you need that MSNBC and CNN are shitholes you fucking ignoramus?

[HokiesAndDawgs]

Facts....you (like the other Obama sheep that voted for this fraud) certainly don't like the FACT that CNN and MSNBC go out of their way to lie about this piece of shit.

[DiamonteLeingod]

Read this very carefully, you idiot: I. Do. Not. Give. A. Single. Shit. About. CNN. Or. MSNBC.

I don't watch any, and I have no desire to. Quit assuming shit, you dumbfuck.

Secondly, don't even fucking start of the 'Obama sheep' bullshit. I could say the same to you for Bill O'Reilly and George Bush. Try not to paint yourself into a corner with your own argument.

[HokiesAndDawgs]

Ok...so at least you admit to being a hypocritical dipshit calling out Fox News while ignoring CNN and MSNBC.

So, you give a shit about Fox News because it proves your point but being the hypocritical piece of garbage you are you don't care that MSNBC and CNN outright lie to help Obama?

Good thing we established that you are indeed an idiot.

[DiamonteLeingod]

Are assumptions all you have to add to your argument? Tell me genius: why DON'T I watch them?

I'll tell you because you're obviously too moronic to use deductive reasoning. I don't watch them because they are all biased. I found that out a long time ago, moron. I gather my RESEARCH elsewhere.

Now, if I were you, I'd retract that 'idiot' statement, else save the fact that I've proven you to be the 'idiot'.

[HokiesAndDawgs]

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLO­LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL.....then don't call out one source without calling them ALL out, idiot.

[DiamonteLeingod]

That just. Your entire argument just collapsed.

[HokiesAndDawgs]

Calling out one for being biased while not calling out the others = hypocrite = you

You have no argument. You lose.

[richie19190]

Olbermann ratings might be terrible, but I am one of the people who watch Olbermann because he speaks the truth unlike Ted Baxter I mean O'Reilly spews right wing propaganda and lies from Fixed News. Isn't O'Reilly spewed out the lie about the WWII battle in Malmedy where he said that U.S. forces shot down S.S. Forces,

[cellardwellinliberal]

richie, I am now dumber for reading your post...shut up

[TheAccountnumber1]

completely unrelated topic. even if they are (be wary of trusting fox for factual evidence) this is about billo being a joke of a journalist, a liar, and a hypocrite.

[mobboss45studios]

Olbermann doesnt even have half the ratings O'Reilly does, Shepard Smith and Greta have more ratings than Olbermann..... Olbermann will not debate any dissenting view. How many times does Keith need to get fired to get it? Keith is the Billy Martin of pundits.

[lovesclassiccars]

Obviously, Olbermann's job isn't to give the news but rather to rant and rave, mock anyone who doesn't agree with him in a manner that is fitting for an 8-year-old, expressing his vile hatred and garabage with twisted truth and lies.

Sure, Olbermann supporters will say the same about the conservatives, but this is a video clip of Olbermann continuing his personal battle with O'Reilly witho not much more substance than his ridiculous behavior. No wonder he gets low ratings.

[HokiesAndDawgs]

Agree completely.

[cneo9400TX]

This guy is always trying to rip apart someone that disagrees, plus his mannerisms are so annoying!

[HokiesAndDawgs]

atticusdonnie: I'll refute it. You fail for one reason. Olberman has always been a liberal douche that sucks up to the Democrats without looking at the other wise. O'Reilly always has a liberal on his show it seems. There's the difference. Allowing a liberal to come and present the other side as opposed to Olberman who does nothing but smear the conservatives during the entire show.

As mentioned, the ratings say it all. Olberman is a complete moron and loser.

[BenJEMean]

Im guessing you havnt seen how he treats people on the show who dont agree with him then? yes they may be on the show, 9 times out of 10 they are there to made a fool of, or bullied politically with loaded questons.

[HokiesAndDawgs]

I think being allowed to come on the show itself and present your viewpoint to the largest audience in ratings for primetime is better than now allowing it like Olberman and doing nothing more than smearing the other side the entire show.

[lovesclassiccars]

Yep. It's not so much that I desagree with Olbermann - although I have agreed a little bit with him a few times - it's the manner how he presents it by stooping pretty low, low enough that I've heard that even some liberals express their disgust with him. And I'm not always happy with the behavior with conservatives. I seriously think he has some anger issues, something with Fox, since he used to work for Fox Sports, and he deals with it on the air.

[HokiesAndDawgs]

Agreed.

[HokiesAndDawgs]

The only one getting destroyed is the idiot Keith Olberman.....take a look at the ratings. Olberman is a schmuck.

[jtrue71]

Keithy-boy, the ratings say it all:  You're a blowhard loser.

[pittaok]

no wonder no one watches this idiot. His rating prove that

[eleikus]

Olbermann  = O'Reilly

[HokiesAndDawgs]

Except that O'Reilly's ratings are about twice as high as Olberman's.

[Raisenkane]

You really destroyed Bill. His ratings show just how good a job you did of that. LMAO!

[bigwig03]

Keith Olbermann is a loser I am glad that him and his 8 follers hate bill. Bill oreilly rules.

[ToQuestionJesus]

*FACEPALM*

Because expressing how dumb that was in words just doesnt work.

[IsisStarlights]

Kieth is a G!

[Rodders213]

Total Ownage

[RotaryDrift]

Wow...This guy is a tool.

[allthings123]

You mean Bill o riely right!

[varran172]

What an absolutely terrible show...no wonder O'Reilly triples his ratings. Olberman is absolutely horrible.

[allthings123]

Why? Its just facts, can you take them?

[dabdizzle]

Keith Olbermann is a fucking nerd and so are you for putting his shit up here. O'Reilly owns.

[staniscanner]

Fuck Kieth Olbermann..... He didn't own shit except Maddows pussy

Bill Oreily OWNS KO

[timparcival]

Excellent, as always.

Yeah, o'leilly and Goldberg, that anyone takes them seriously is a sad comment on the US media today. (If I were a conservative, I'd here bring up something relevant, like Obama's reliance on teleprompters, or "liberal kool aid." But who ever suggested the "right" is capable of relevance?)

[GriffinPilgrim]

Game, set and match, Keith!

[PuzzleBox83]

Janeane Garofalo? Really? I haven't even seen her in years, let alone heard from her. Wow, they are reaching.

[viagragod]

olberman is a plank! keith i challenge you to bring o'reilly onto your show...you would wither with him in front of you!

[PuzzleBox83]

Bill-O Refuses to even let his guests use Keiths name on his radio show and his TV show.

[Trizesta]

KO is KING! 'Nuff said!

[ekjohndeer]

King of what? King of morons like you that you can't think for themselfs.

[struveinsky]

you mean themselves? Ah, but you are not a moron.

[Rodney92]

O'Reilly is such a sad person.

[ODDMANtheone]

OK - can we all just agree on one thing - Conservatives are not even close to being as funny as Liberals. Not even close. Damn.

[PuzzleBox83]

Ben Stein thinks he is funny.

[Euroman25]

I am Conservative but this is still funny !

[GrimRoguePrince]

At least their journalists unlike O'Reilly.

[GeorgiaREbroker]

Olbermann specializes in attacking persons who threaten him. He rarely utters an original idea about any subject. He just picks someone he doesn't like and smears them. Like liberals in general, he is a loser n the arena of ideas, so his stock MO is to attack the messenger. He hates O'Reilly, who drives him into the ground nightly in terms of ratings. Why do so many millions more Americans watch O'Reilly than Olbermann? Poor, insecure, hate-driven Keith.

[eyir]

Hate-driven? What irony.

It never fails to amaze me when someone defends O'Reilly or Limbaugh when they face criticism. The whole line of reasoning for these neo-con blowhards is based on attacking and demonizing those with a different political ideology, especially when Billo sends his ambush team out to harass people with whom he disagrees.

In this case, Olbermann was defending himself, and he did a great job lambasting the Loofah King.

[joespeed87]

At least Olbermann is honest,unlike O'Reilly.Limbaugh or any other Republican radio or talk show host. By the way,didnt you know the Republicans are losing respect around America. Look at the numbers and you will see that Republicans are getting low numbers in every poll on tv. As someone told me in the past: the shit isnt working,so come up with something new or else,be left behind.

[MikeT07521]

Yea we can tell your from Georgia. Hillbillie