Whoa, a 3-D printer for just $300??? Dang, I remember when it could have cost that much for a 2-D dot-matrix! (That would've been in my elementary & middle years.)
You know, maybe we should program printers to print parts of themselves, so once we put it together, then... well, you fill in the blanks.
@rockebanane Maybe it's cheaper to replace broken parts with those that we print ourselves as opposed to ordering said parts, paying for shipping, and waiting the few days.
Oh yeah, let's cut out the middleman so we can make even more money of the people directly.
Alphasys 1 month ago
So it's like i.materialize?
Djhg2000 1 month ago
@Djhg2000 Typo, I meant i.materialise
Djhg2000 1 month ago
@Djhg2000 Either way was correct. -ze was American English; -se was British/Commonwealth.
EgaoNoGenki 1 month ago
Whoa, a 3-D printer for just $300??? Dang, I remember when it could have cost that much for a 2-D dot-matrix! (That would've been in my elementary & middle years.)
You know, maybe we should program printers to print parts of themselves, so once we put it together, then... well, you fill in the blanks.
EgaoNoGenki 1 month ago
@EgaoNoGenki good idea, but those parts are much cheaper produced in mass producation (accumulation of ressources ect) :)
rockebanane 1 month ago
@EgaoNoGenki and think of: why should we fill gaps when the product is already working? :D
rockebanane 1 month ago
@rockebanane Maybe it's cheaper to replace broken parts with those that we print ourselves as opposed to ordering said parts, paying for shipping, and waiting the few days.
EgaoNoGenki 1 month ago
@EgaoNoGenki look up RepRap beat you to it
xzorg69 1 month ago