***PEOPLE, PLEASE READ MY *COMMENTS IN THE YOUTUBE VIDEO “MICHAEL MOORE VISITS MADISON”!!! (THE ONE WITH OVER 500,000 VIEWS. MY COMMENTS BEGIN ON COMMENT PAGE 2)
while I respect Michael Moore, he made real important issues that border on treason for people like Clinton (NAFTA) and made it into a joke. we laugh all while we now do NOTHING about these issues because hey now their funny. alex jones is right about Moore, period.
@tomitstube JTfromStLOuis is just another jackass who believes in freedumb, because he's an idiot who can't think for himself. probably a Ron PaulBOT who wants freedom for the multinationals and fascist politicians who get paid off to outsource to fuk us over.
@LouieArrighi ~ what i was thinking, i don't doubt the cock brothers, karl "potato head" rove, the cato institute, the heritage foundation, etc. etc. spend millions to flood public sites with their corporate garbage.
what these fascists promote isn't even remotely a "free market", it's a corporate market that pushes people into poverty for a bigger corporate piece of the pie, they're actually anti-free market, and if you ask me, anti-american.
@LouieArrighi u know nothing about Ron Paul, who has fought outsourcing and is not a fascist but hey I bet u are too lazy to actually look into what Ron Paul says. Go and do some research into what he says and what he does before u even answer back, if that is u can.
Don't you guys realize that government and Business have colluded since the days of Alexander Hamilton? Neither government nor business is the answer to our economic struggles as a people. This is the inherit flaw with capitalism, that Ethics, Sustainability, and Rights of the People take a backseat to outsourcing, imperialism in poor countries with a cheap labor source, and a mockery of governance that the Media has displayed with this circus act of two factions in a constant struggle 4 nothing
Michael Moore is but a different form of racist, because he wants to keep white jobs in white america. What he doesn't want is people of different colour from other countries to take white jobs.
@bluedog454 That is racist, to think that american race is some how different to other races so that's it is the reason to prevent Jobs from spreading around. Is hidden racism.
@simontimon2 no, it's not racist, because technically, American is a nationality, not an ethnic race, and also, you are completely misinformed on why America doesn't want to send jobs outside of the country, if we do send jobs outside of the country, then that will hurt our economy, and our people won't have any work. that's why, not because of race, it's because of economics.
@simontimon2 the jobs don't even go to africa, they go to places where there are already jobs. we'll be the ones who are starving to death because we won't have jobs. it won't benefit the world, it will help a few countries, but it will hurt us. sending jobs to other countries is NOT a good thing. why is this so complicated to you? what part do you not understand? it will not be good for us if we do so, it won't benefit anyone but greedy CEOs. it's not a good thing. its a basic fact.
@simontimon2 no it doesn't. first of all, this has nothing to do with race, which is a huge part of your argument, second, we are in a recession, there hasn't been anything this bad since the great depression. we cannot afford to lose anymore jobs. we have lost thousands of them already. it is not helping us, it is HURTING. this is so simple! how old are you? you don't seem to know much about economics, it's is a basic fact that sending jobs to foreign countries is NOT good.
@bluedog454 The great depression of the 1930's was caused by the Smoot-Hawley Tariff. because dumasses like you thought it was a good idea to put a 50% tariff on all importes. The Idea was that it would prevent jobs from leaving the country. Well guess what it didn't work! unempoyment tripled and it stayed that way for a decade.
@simontimon2 i'm a dumbass? you don't even know anything about economics!! LOL who thinks its a good idea for jobs to leave the country? no one, but idiots! and fyi, there were several causes of the great depression, such as the stock market crash of 1929, bank failures, reduction in purchases, and indirectly, drought conditions in the Mississippi Valley (the area was important in agriculture). also, i am a Democrat. The tariff was passed and signed by President Hoover, a Republican. LOL idiot
@simontimon2 no, you are mixing this up. you said that "dumbasses' like me "thought it was a good idea to put a 50% tariff on all imports", when in fact, it was republicans who did that, and i am in the opposing party, so it was not people like me.
@simontimon2 no i'm not. i'm trying to explain to you why exporting jobs is bad. this is just a simple fact about economics. and i'm trying to explain to you how michael moore not wanting jobs to leave the country is not "racist". you said earlier, "Michael Moore is but a different form of racist, because he wants to keep white jobs in white america'. he never said anything about race, he was just saying it's not good, and it is not good. i didn't say anything else.
@bluedog454 Exporting jobs is good for the economy, because you also end importing more jobs then you lose. Since the creation of NAFTA 26 million jobs where created and 6 million where lost. With free trade you end up with net job profit.
@simontimon2 no! where did you get that idea? outsourcing jobs does NOT help! we wouldn't gain jobs, we would lose them. how would we gain jobs by losing them? that doesn't make any sense.
@simontimon2 solution to what? all you said is that outsourcing jobs is "good" and that Michael Moore was racist because he didn't want jobs to leave the country. I was trying to explain to you how completely untrue that was. you didn't propose any problem.
@simontimon2 i'm not complaining. i was trying to explain how outsourcing jobs is not good. oh my gosh, do you even read your own comments? *face palm*
i am in favor of not giving tax cuts to companies that outsource jobs, but give it to those who keep the jobs here. it was a bill proposed about a week or two ago but it was fillibustered by Republicans..
@simontimon2 no, how old are you? 10? you know almost nothing about economics. i just said that it is bad in some ways because it would replace a person, but you need people to make the machines. so you lose a job and then gain a job. its neutral. and fyi, it's a fact that outsourcing is bad. you must have some serious problems if you think its good......
the only way you could have become wealthy by outsourcing jobs is either you're the person outsourcing them, or you live in a country where jobs are being sent. no wonder why you defend outsourcing jobs.
@bluedog454 I am wealthy because I work in a jade mine in Northern Canada. Where I maintain the mashinery that carries the jade from the mountain top were it's mined.
I say outsourcing is good because China has outsourced practically all of it's jade mining to Canada. Creating employing that otherwise wouldn't be there if it weren't for outsourcing.
@simontimon2 well that wouldn't really effect china, because there are a lot more jobs going to china then leaving. it may create employing for you, but a jade miner in china would probably lose his jobs. like i said, it only benefits people who own companies or the country where jobs are being sent.
@simontimon2 its not progress! its hurting us!! that is not progress and we can stop it. we can stop it by not giving benefits to companies that outsource jobs, we can do plenty of things to stop it.
@bluedog454 people like you where making the same argument a 100 years ago, when it was the US that everyone was outsourcing to. It's still called progess, and not giving certain companies benifites is only gonna encourage companies to leave.
@simontimon2 no its not. if they are american companies, then america would be the ones giving them benefits, if we take that away if the outsource, then they won't outsource. its just one way. its not progress for us though. it might be for greedy CEOs and the countries where jobs are ebing outsource, but its not for us. thats the thing i am trying to tell you is bad. what don't you get????
@simontimon2 i don't understand logic? you're the one who has no idea what you are talking about. if jobs are outsourced to another country, then that would hurt us, not help us, because people would lose their jobs. see how that works?
@simontimon2 now you are getting irrational. i never said anything about free trade, NAFTA, or anything else, all i talked about was outsourcing jobs, so you need to just shut up and actually learn about outsourcing because no one who had common sense would support outsourcing jobs when the jobs are leaving their country unless they own the coperation outsourcing the jobs.
@bluedog454 If you create laws and regulations that stop outsoucing. You'll unintentionaly stop insoucring since 5 million americans get their paychecks from foreign firms.
@simontimon2 you keep assuming. i never said any of those things and yet you say that i want people to lose their jobs. i never said about a law banning it, i said about a law not giving benefits to companies that outsource. nothing about jobs coming, just jobs going out. you seriously need to read my comments. you're making yourself look like you know nothing....
@simontimon2 you're such a fucking idiot. i never said put the government in charge. quote me. but wait, you can't, because that's just something you made up. you so stupid. i was talking about benefits for companies and who we should give them to. not about government control you dumbass. how old are you? you seriously know nothing.
Funny thing is one of the companies my wife supplies is a famous American clothing brand. It as just closed it's Mexican production and moved everything to Hong Kong due to the increasing violence.
So assume other companies will now move the jobs back to the US or more likely China. Well at least Moore will be happy. No more Mexicans taking American jobs at least not in Mexico.
I love how he talks about the union's victory over General Motors. Little did he know back in 1999 when this show was made what that victory would eventually do to GM and the union workers who were employed there.
@mrklp i am not in any way union supporter i am self employed contractor for big giant corporation so i am exact oposite of union but GM going down had nothing to do with union it was more like Pontiac aztec and Chevy malibu maxx and awful Cady catera when i am looking at that cars i feel like they built them by custom order for Enterprise rent a car or Hertz Germans have almost communist government and union that GM s union cant even come close to but MB and BMW did not go belly up !
@shavimusha You don't know what you're talking about. GM was still the #2 company, selling more cars than most other car companies combined. There was plenty of demand for their products, but demand means nothing when you're losing money on each vehicle you sell.
Bottom line: GM's profit margins went negative because it cost them more to manufacture each car than it did for their non-union Japanese competitors.
The ironic thing is back in 1999 GM was hiring people in the Detroit area plants. now there's only about 10 plants open out of the over 200 that were in Michigan........!
Why dont u tell the whole truth about the "sit down" strike at gm, that they used violence an over 100 people were killed because of the strike. u neglected to tell that part of it. u have half truths ans partial facts, u are a predator of the people that are uneducated of the whole facts. in fact u are one of the rich trying to get richer, u are a fraud moore
they pay mexicans 35 bucks a week, instead of paying americans 600 bucks a week,you would think the mexicans would realise that they could get alot more if they negotiated. hey amigo's wake up!.
@remotehog1 They can't afford to do that. There are millions of people in Mexico who would kill for a $35 weekly wage. And I don't think unions are legal in Mexico, but I could be mistaken. Even if they did strike, the company would just hire a whole batch of new employees. Besides, $35 a week is a really excellent wage in Mexico. Most people there don't make that much in a month.
These people cheat Mexican people and it's all about rich people becoming richer from lying, betraying and cheating people. Mexicans deserve just as much per hour as Americans received for the same jobs. It's all about the rich becoming richer. Welcome to slavery 101
Ilegal aliens do take American jobs. Try doing dry walling in LA. You can't if your an American. An illegal is doing the same job 100 times cheaper and not paying any taxes. True story.
True story indeed my friend, i live one east coast and its the same deal out here, its bullshit theirs about 100 of them in the mornings standing out side 7-11 waiting for someone to pick them up illegally for work, worst of all the cops do NOthing, sicking isnt it.
@shoogie06 walling, really? why don't you go back to school, get a job that wont kill you... what are you gonna complain about next? how you can't get a job being a maid 'cause all the filipino ladies have taken them? Loser.
as a mexican, the bad thing is that not all the jobs are being outsource to mexico, but to india and china and other countries
GIJose84 1 month ago
Dr. Jan itor!
Crifox 4 months ago in playlist Season 1
This has been flagged as spam show
***PEOPLE, PLEASE READ MY *COMMENTS IN THE YOUTUBE VIDEO “MICHAEL MOORE VISITS MADISON”!!! (THE ONE WITH OVER 500,000 VIEWS. MY COMMENTS BEGIN ON COMMENT PAGE 2)
ObiWanGinobiliTopFan 5 months ago
while I respect Michael Moore, he made real important issues that border on treason for people like Clinton (NAFTA) and made it into a joke. we laugh all while we now do NOTHING about these issues because hey now their funny. alex jones is right about Moore, period.
kimpunkrock 7 months ago
43 Liberal morons would sell their soul to the devil to suck Mike's shrinky-dink...
JTfromSTL 8 months ago
@JTfromSTL ~ we've got a jeep job for you in mexico you fascist jackass. $3.70 an hour with no medical. fucking moron.
tomitstube 8 months ago
@tomitstube JTfromStLOuis is just another jackass who believes in freedumb, because he's an idiot who can't think for himself. probably a Ron PaulBOT who wants freedom for the multinationals and fascist politicians who get paid off to outsource to fuk us over.
LouieArrighi 8 months ago
@LouieArrighi ~ what i was thinking, i don't doubt the cock brothers, karl "potato head" rove, the cato institute, the heritage foundation, etc. etc. spend millions to flood public sites with their corporate garbage.
what these fascists promote isn't even remotely a "free market", it's a corporate market that pushes people into poverty for a bigger corporate piece of the pie, they're actually anti-free market, and if you ask me, anti-american.
tomitstube 8 months ago
@LouieArrighi u know nothing about Ron Paul, who has fought outsourcing and is not a fascist but hey I bet u are too lazy to actually look into what Ron Paul says. Go and do some research into what he says and what he does before u even answer back, if that is u can.
kimpunkrock 7 months ago
Four close-minded republican tards saw this video.
FrozenAtrox 9 months ago 9
oh btw i know the guy at 11:37 haha
Chalax92 10 months ago
i hate this kind of videos where they only show the ugly things about my country Mexico...
Im sure everyone would think "I want to go to Mexico" if they showed the beautiful things about it more often... sigh
Chalax92 10 months ago
Don't you guys realize that government and Business have colluded since the days of Alexander Hamilton? Neither government nor business is the answer to our economic struggles as a people. This is the inherit flaw with capitalism, that Ethics, Sustainability, and Rights of the People take a backseat to outsourcing, imperialism in poor countries with a cheap labor source, and a mockery of governance that the Media has displayed with this circus act of two factions in a constant struggle 4 nothing
SORRYYOUREWRONGGUY 10 months ago
4 people support unions
EvansdiAl 10 months ago
janitor from scrubs??
flufflips11 10 months ago
A democrat signed the NAFTA bill into law. Obama has made it stronger .
TELEVISIONARCHIVES 1 year ago
Nice, thank you Michael!
Slayerfan84 1 year ago
Michael Moore is but a different form of racist, because he wants to keep white jobs in white america. What he doesn't want is people of different colour from other countries to take white jobs.
simontimon2 1 year ago
@simontimon2 when has he said that? i'm pretty sure he wants American jobs to stay in the US, not mattering what race the person is.
bluedog454 1 year ago
@bluedog454 That is racist, to think that american race is some how different to other races so that's it is the reason to prevent Jobs from spreading around. Is hidden racism.
simontimon2 1 year ago
@simontimon2 no, it's not racist, because technically, American is a nationality, not an ethnic race, and also, you are completely misinformed on why America doesn't want to send jobs outside of the country, if we do send jobs outside of the country, then that will hurt our economy, and our people won't have any work. that's why, not because of race, it's because of economics.
bluedog454 1 year ago
It benfits world by speading jobs around. It helps Poor africans by giving them jobs that enables them not to starve to death.
simontimon2 1 year ago
@simontimon2 the jobs don't even go to africa, they go to places where there are already jobs. we'll be the ones who are starving to death because we won't have jobs. it won't benefit the world, it will help a few countries, but it will hurt us. sending jobs to other countries is NOT a good thing. why is this so complicated to you? what part do you not understand? it will not be good for us if we do so, it won't benefit anyone but greedy CEOs. it's not a good thing. its a basic fact.
bluedog454 1 year ago
this perfectly explains my argument
/watch?v=Z9csCerjfdE
simontimon2 1 year ago
@simontimon2 no it doesn't. first of all, this has nothing to do with race, which is a huge part of your argument, second, we are in a recession, there hasn't been anything this bad since the great depression. we cannot afford to lose anymore jobs. we have lost thousands of them already. it is not helping us, it is HURTING. this is so simple! how old are you? you don't seem to know much about economics, it's is a basic fact that sending jobs to foreign countries is NOT good.
bluedog454 1 year ago
@bluedog454 The great depression of the 1930's was caused by the Smoot-Hawley Tariff. because dumasses like you thought it was a good idea to put a 50% tariff on all importes. The Idea was that it would prevent jobs from leaving the country. Well guess what it didn't work! unempoyment tripled and it stayed that way for a decade.
simontimon2 1 year ago
@simontimon2 i'm a dumbass? you don't even know anything about economics!! LOL who thinks its a good idea for jobs to leave the country? no one, but idiots! and fyi, there were several causes of the great depression, such as the stock market crash of 1929, bank failures, reduction in purchases, and indirectly, drought conditions in the Mississippi Valley (the area was important in agriculture). also, i am a Democrat. The tariff was passed and signed by President Hoover, a Republican. LOL idiot
bluedog454 1 year ago
It was the smoot-Hawley tariff that turned it from a recession to a depression.
I never said I was a republican. I'm a member of the Libertarian party.
simontimon2 1 year ago
@simontimon2 no, you are mixing this up. you said that "dumbasses' like me "thought it was a good idea to put a 50% tariff on all imports", when in fact, it was republicans who did that, and i am in the opposing party, so it was not people like me.
bluedog454 1 year ago
@bluedog454 That doesn't change anything, because your arguing for the same action.
simontimon2 1 year ago
@simontimon2 no i'm not. i'm trying to explain to you why exporting jobs is bad. this is just a simple fact about economics. and i'm trying to explain to you how michael moore not wanting jobs to leave the country is not "racist". you said earlier, "Michael Moore is but a different form of racist, because he wants to keep white jobs in white america'. he never said anything about race, he was just saying it's not good, and it is not good. i didn't say anything else.
bluedog454 1 year ago
@bluedog454 Exporting jobs is good for the economy, because you also end importing more jobs then you lose. Since the creation of NAFTA 26 million jobs where created and 6 million where lost. With free trade you end up with net job profit.
simontimon2 1 year ago
@simontimon2 no! where did you get that idea? outsourcing jobs does NOT help! we wouldn't gain jobs, we would lose them. how would we gain jobs by losing them? that doesn't make any sense.
bluedog454 1 year ago
@bluedog454 Well then, whats your solution? because so far you've done nothing complain.
simontimon2 1 year ago
@simontimon2 solution to what? all you said is that outsourcing jobs is "good" and that Michael Moore was racist because he didn't want jobs to leave the country. I was trying to explain to you how completely untrue that was. you didn't propose any problem.
bluedog454 1 year ago
@bluedog454 Well then, if you think its such a grave problem then what solution to outsourcing?
insted of complaining about it.
simontimon2 1 year ago
@simontimon2 i'm not complaining. i was trying to explain how outsourcing jobs is not good. oh my gosh, do you even read your own comments? *face palm*
i am in favor of not giving tax cuts to companies that outsource jobs, but give it to those who keep the jobs here. it was a bill proposed about a week or two ago but it was fillibustered by Republicans..
bluedog454 1 year ago
@bluedog454 What's the difference between outsourcing and new technologies that eliminate job.
Since far more job have been eleminated by machine then by outsourcing.
Manufacturing in the US is higher then it's ever been, its just that machines do all the work instead of people.
simontimon2 1 year ago
@simontimon2 so that's another reason why outsourcing is bad. we need to keep all of the jobs we can. outsourcing doesn't help.
bluedog454 1 year ago
@simontimon2 also, you need people to make the machines. so it would help somewhat...
bluedog454 1 year ago
@bluedog454 You don't get the point I make. If you make the argument that outsourcing is bad, then you also validate that machinery is also bad.
simontimon2 1 year ago
@simontimon2 no, how old are you? 10? you know almost nothing about economics. i just said that it is bad in some ways because it would replace a person, but you need people to make the machines. so you lose a job and then gain a job. its neutral. and fyi, it's a fact that outsourcing is bad. you must have some serious problems if you think its good......
bluedog454 1 year ago
@bluedog454 I know enough about economic to have become wealthy off of it.
simontimon2 1 year ago
@simontimon2 ok sure.......
the only way you could have become wealthy by outsourcing jobs is either you're the person outsourcing them, or you live in a country where jobs are being sent. no wonder why you defend outsourcing jobs.
bluedog454 1 year ago
@bluedog454 I am wealthy because I work in a jade mine in Northern Canada. Where I maintain the mashinery that carries the jade from the mountain top were it's mined.
I say outsourcing is good because China has outsourced practically all of it's jade mining to Canada. Creating employing that otherwise wouldn't be there if it weren't for outsourcing.
simontimon2 1 year ago
@simontimon2 well that wouldn't really effect china, because there are a lot more jobs going to china then leaving. it may create employing for you, but a jade miner in china would probably lose his jobs. like i said, it only benefits people who own companies or the country where jobs are being sent.
bluedog454 1 year ago
@bluedog454 listen it's call progress, get used to it! nothing gona stop it.
simontimon2 1 year ago
@simontimon2 its not progress! its hurting us!! that is not progress and we can stop it. we can stop it by not giving benefits to companies that outsource jobs, we can do plenty of things to stop it.
bluedog454 1 year ago
@bluedog454 people like you where making the same argument a 100 years ago, when it was the US that everyone was outsourcing to. It's still called progess, and not giving certain companies benifites is only gonna encourage companies to leave.
simontimon2 1 year ago
@simontimon2 no its not. if they are american companies, then america would be the ones giving them benefits, if we take that away if the outsource, then they won't outsource. its just one way. its not progress for us though. it might be for greedy CEOs and the countries where jobs are ebing outsource, but its not for us. thats the thing i am trying to tell you is bad. what don't you get????
bluedog454 1 year ago
Comment removed
simontimon2 1 year ago
@simontimon2 i don't understand logic? you're the one who has no idea what you are talking about. if jobs are outsourced to another country, then that would hurt us, not help us, because people would lose their jobs. see how that works?
bluedog454 1 year ago
@bluedog454 Your the same kind of people that believe free trade is bad. Well then whats wrong with free trade in employment.
simontimon2 1 year ago
@simontimon2 now you are getting irrational. i never said anything about free trade, NAFTA, or anything else, all i talked about was outsourcing jobs, so you need to just shut up and actually learn about outsourcing because no one who had common sense would support outsourcing jobs when the jobs are leaving their country unless they own the coperation outsourcing the jobs.
bluedog454 1 year ago
@bluedog454 If you create laws and regulations that stop outsoucing. You'll unintentionaly stop insoucring since 5 million americans get their paychecks from foreign firms.
simontimon2 1 year ago
@simontimon2 you keep assuming. i never said any of those things and yet you say that i want people to lose their jobs. i never said about a law banning it, i said about a law not giving benefits to companies that outsource. nothing about jobs coming, just jobs going out. you seriously need to read my comments. you're making yourself look like you know nothing....
bluedog454 1 year ago
@bluedog454 Yah like government great at runningthe economy. Why don't you check out public housing, public school, and Fema.
Puting the government in charge of the economy is like puting rosie o'donald in charge of your last doughnut!
simontimon2 1 year ago
@simontimon2 you're such a fucking idiot. i never said put the government in charge. quote me. but wait, you can't, because that's just something you made up. you so stupid. i was talking about benefits for companies and who we should give them to. not about government control you dumbass. how old are you? you seriously know nothing.
bluedog454 1 year ago
A quote from former Rep Alan Grayson, "Don't hate Government cause you are bad at it"!
Slayerfan84 1 year ago 5
Funny thing is one of the companies my wife supplies is a famous American clothing brand. It as just closed it's Mexican production and moved everything to Hong Kong due to the increasing violence.
So assume other companies will now move the jobs back to the US or more likely China. Well at least Moore will be happy. No more Mexicans taking American jobs at least not in Mexico.
hkpho0ey 1 year ago
If all the Jobs are going into Mexico, why the hell do they keep coming here?
heavenshaffer 1 year ago
@heavenshaffer most probably come here for better wages, shorter working hours, and better conditions.
bluedog454 1 year ago
PDRT!!!!!!!!!!!
heavenshaffer 1 year ago
@heavenshaffer Let's all join!!!!
heavenshaffer 1 year ago
Moore is so up him self.
lanceat1 1 year ago
I love how he talks about the union's victory over General Motors. Little did he know back in 1999 when this show was made what that victory would eventually do to GM and the union workers who were employed there.
mrklp 1 year ago
@mrklp i am not in any way union supporter i am self employed contractor for big giant corporation so i am exact oposite of union but GM going down had nothing to do with union it was more like Pontiac aztec and Chevy malibu maxx and awful Cady catera when i am looking at that cars i feel like they built them by custom order for Enterprise rent a car or Hertz Germans have almost communist government and union that GM s union cant even come close to but MB and BMW did not go belly up !
shavimusha 1 year ago
@shavimusha You don't know what you're talking about. GM was still the #2 company, selling more cars than most other car companies combined. There was plenty of demand for their products, but demand means nothing when you're losing money on each vehicle you sell.
Bottom line: GM's profit margins went negative because it cost them more to manufacture each car than it did for their non-union Japanese competitors.
mrklp 1 year ago
4:28 "the new flint of the new world order"
piketyl000 1 year ago
The ironic thing is back in 1999 GM was hiring people in the Detroit area plants. now there's only about 10 plants open out of the over 200 that were in Michigan........!
METALMAN4Wii 1 year ago
every episode online streaming at Spartacus Online Stream =dot -com
lackinghairstyl 1 year ago
Why dont u tell the whole truth about the "sit down" strike at gm, that they used violence an over 100 people were killed because of the strike. u neglected to tell that part of it. u have half truths ans partial facts, u are a predator of the people that are uneducated of the whole facts. in fact u are one of the rich trying to get richer, u are a fraud moore
buddymac201 1 year ago
@buddymac201 no bodys perfect
MultiCoolcat69 1 year ago
@buddymac201 ill bet if you were filfthy rich you wouldn't even look up to those people
Dieenejeweetwel 1 year ago
@buddymac201
How can "u" accuse someone of being uneducated, when you can't even use proper punctuation?
Mczar48 1 year ago
"Grammar"...
Mczar48 1 year ago
@Mczar48 first of all punctuation is commas periods etc...... and if that is all you have to bitch about go get a life moron.
buddymac201 1 year ago
@buddymac201
That's why the second comment, posted 2 seconds later (which i know you read) says "Grammar". Nice Try though.
Mczar48 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@buddymac201
That's why the second comment, posted 2 seconds later (which i know you read) says "Grammar". Nice try though.
Mczar48 1 year ago
@buddymac201
That's why the second comment, posted 2 seconds later (which i know you read) says "Grammar". Nice try though.
Mczar48 1 year ago
i guess the only solution is a one world government that way everyone has to follow the same rules, a world wide minimum wage?.
remotehog1 1 year ago
they pay mexicans 35 bucks a week, instead of paying americans 600 bucks a week,you would think the mexicans would realise that they could get alot more if they negotiated. hey amigo's wake up!.
remotehog1 1 year ago
Then they would just go somewhere else. Without international solidarity, things are very hard in an international economy
nonameposter 1 year ago
@remotehog1 They can't afford to do that. There are millions of people in Mexico who would kill for a $35 weekly wage. And I don't think unions are legal in Mexico, but I could be mistaken. Even if they did strike, the company would just hire a whole batch of new employees. Besides, $35 a week is a really excellent wage in Mexico. Most people there don't make that much in a month.
Smackerlacker1 1 year ago
smart man.
sawiniful 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
every episode no matter where in the world you are Spartacus Online Stream -dot -com
alluringlaborer 1 year ago
These people cheat Mexican people and it's all about rich people becoming richer from lying, betraying and cheating people. Mexicans deserve just as much per hour as Americans received for the same jobs. It's all about the rich becoming richer. Welcome to slavery 101
Jessecraft1954 1 year ago
I wonder what channel this was on TV
joshman86z 1 year ago
Bravo TV
ladyduck02 1 year ago
Corporate douchbag pwnd ;)
Deadleader555 2 years ago
ok....wait a minute..
22:14
the "priest" is actor/writer Malachy McCourt
why did they need an actor to play a priest.?
carrieluvv 2 years ago
Hey...
The lead Strikebreaker was the janitor from Scrubs.
TheSmartestOneHere 2 years ago
That guy is awsome!!
bornState 2 years ago
Ilegal aliens do take American jobs. Try doing dry walling in LA. You can't if your an American. An illegal is doing the same job 100 times cheaper and not paying any taxes. True story.
shoogie06 2 years ago
True story indeed my friend, i live one east coast and its the same deal out here, its bullshit theirs about 100 of them in the mornings standing out side 7-11 waiting for someone to pick them up illegally for work, worst of all the cops do NOthing, sicking isnt it.
Kingkillla21 2 years ago
actually they do pay some taxes when they shop the charged taxes
dumbassfer23 2 years ago
@shoogie06 walling, really? why don't you go back to school, get a job that wont kill you... what are you gonna complain about next? how you can't get a job being a maid 'cause all the filipino ladies have taken them? Loser.
mari0velle 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
UAW's fault. End result is GM of today.
erickthegreat98 2 years ago
Funny
julyandmarch05 2 years ago